AASHTO Rigid Pavement Design

Similar documents
AASHTO Rigid Pavement Design

Rigid Pavement Stress Analysis

Impact of Existing Pavement on Jointed Plain Concrete Overlay Design and Performance

Flexible Pavement Stress Analysis

Structural Design of Pavements

ACET 406 Mid-Term Exam B

Sensitivity Analysis Of Aashto's 2002 Flexible And Rigid Pavement Design Methods

Rigid Pavement Mechanics. Curling Stresses

Base Design Considerations for Jointed Concrete. Dan G. Zollinger, Ph.D., P.E. Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA

GAMINGRE 8/1/ of 7

INTRODUCTION TO PAVEMENT STRUCTURES

Comparison of Rigid Pavement Thickness Design Systems

Lecture 3: Stresses in Rigid Pavements

FULL-DEPTH HMA PAVEMENT DESIGN

Mechanistic Pavement Design

Rigid pavement design

The Role of Subbase Support in Concrete Pavement Sustainability

WHEN IS IT EVER GOING TO RAIN? Table of Average Annual Rainfall and Rainfall For Selected Arizona Cities

Evaluation of the Subbase Drag Formula by Considering Realistic Subbase Friction Values

ANNEX 1. PAVEMENT DESIGN METHODS

MECHANISTIC-EMPIRICAL PAVEMENT ANALYSIS AND DESIGN. University of Wisconsin Milwaukee Paper No. 13-2

KANSAS RIGID PAVEMENT ANALYSIS FOLLOWING NEW MECHANISTIC-EMPIRICAL DESIGN GUIDE TASLIMA KHANUM A THESIS

Jackson County 2013 Weather Data

DETERMINE JOINTED PLAIN CONCRETE PAVEMENT (JPCP) SLAB REPLACEMENT TREATMENT USING SENSING TECHNOLOGY

Guide for Mechanistic-Empirical Design

GEOSYNTHETICS ENGINEERING: IN THEORY AND PRACTICE

Coefficient of Thermal Expansion of Concrete Pavements

Evaluating Structural Performance of Base/Subbase Materials at the Louisiana Accelerated Pavement Research Facility

Jackson County 2018 Weather Data 67 Years of Weather Data Recorded at the UF/IFAS Marianna North Florida Research and Education Center

Technical note on seasonal adjustment for M0

Comparison of Ontario Pavement Designs Using the AASHTO 1993 Empirical Method and the Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide Method

Flexible Pavement Design

Revised Test Plan for Seasonal Monitoring Program using HWD Testing

2015 North Dakota Asphalt Conference

Analysis of in-service PCC pavement responses from Denver International Airport

Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide: A User s Perspective. Brian D. Prowell, Ph.D., P.E.

Chiang Rai Province CC Threat overview AAS1109 Mekong ARCC

Evaluating Structural Performance of Base/Subbase Materials at the Louisiana Accelerated Pavement Research Facility

LTPP InfoPave TM Extracting Information out of LTPP Data

ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS OF EARLY AGE AND LONG TERM RESPONSE OF PCC PAVEMENT

STRUCTURAL ADEQUACY OF RUBBLIZED PCC PAVEMENT

CHAPTER-11 CLIMATE AND RAINFALL

Lecture 2: Stresses in Pavements

Analysis of Non-Linear Dynamic Behaviours in Asphalt Concrete Pavements Under Temperature Variations

Jackson County 2014 Weather Data

Flexible Pavement Analysis

Permeable Pavement Overview

Guide for Mechanistic-Empirical Design

Guide for Mechanistic-Empirical Design

2002 Design Guide Preparing for Implementation

Analysis and Design of Rigid Pavement on Collapsible and Expansive Soils

APPENDIX B DISTRESSES

ADVANCEMENT OF EROSION TESTING, MODELING, AND DESIGN OF CONCRETE PAVEMENT SUBBASE LAYERS

TABLE 3-7. RECOMMENDED EQUWALENCY FACTOR RANGES FOR STABILIZED SUBBASE. Eauivalencv Factor Range

Field Rutting Performance of Various Base/Subbase Materials under Two Types of Loading

The Use of Terrafix TBX Biaxial Geogrids in an MTO Empirical Pavement Design

METHODS FOR EVALUATING RESILIENT MODULI OF PAVING MATERIALS

Memo. I. Executive Summary. II. ALERT Data Source. III. General System-Wide Reporting Summary. Date: January 26, 2009 To: From: Subject:

Unbound Pavement Applications of Excess Foundry System Sands: Subbase/Base Material

Figure 2-1: Stresses under axisymmetric circular loading

DAILY QUESTIONS 28 TH JUNE 18 REASONING - CALENDAR

Mark B. Snyder, Ph.D., P.E., Engineering Consultant Bridgeville, Pennsylvania

Calibration of Mechanistic-Empirical Fatigue Models Using the PaveLab Heavy Vehicle Simulator

ME PDG Rigid Pavement Design Reliability Update. Further Calibration of the Distress Prediction Models & Reliability Effects

Webinar and Weekly Summary February 15th, 2011

2019 Settlement Calendar for ASX Cash Market Products. ASX Settlement

REDWOOD VALLEY SUBAREA

ENGINE SERIAL NUMBERS

ALACPA-ICAO Seminar on PMS. Lima Peru, November 2003

Evaluation of Rutting Depth in Flexible Pavements by Using Finite Element Analysis and Local Empirical Model

Changing Hydrology under a Changing Climate for a Coastal Plain Watershed

MECHANISTIC-EMPIRICAL LOAD EQUIVALENCIES USING WEIGH IN MOTION

Life Cycle of Convective Systems over Western Colombia

STUDY ON EFFECTS OF NONLINIAR DISTRIBUTION AND SLAB THICKNESS ON THERMAL STRESS OF AIRPORT CONCRETE PAVEMENT

Malaysian Journal of Civil Engineering 29(3): (2017)

Sensitivity Analysis of 2002 Design Guide Rigid Pavement Distress Prediction Models

P7.7 A CLIMATOLOGICAL STUDY OF CLOUD TO GROUND LIGHTNING STRIKES IN THE VICINITY OF KENNEDY SPACE CENTER, FLORIDA

Field-Calibrated Mechanistic-Empirical Models for Jointed Concrete Pavements

The Climate of Pontotoc County

INTRODUCTION TO MECHANISTIC-EMPIRICAL (M-E) DESIGN SHORT COURSE

Jackson County 2019 Weather Data 68 Years of Weather Data Recorded at the UF/IFAS Marianna North Florida Research and Education Center

2017 Settlement Calendar for ASX Cash Market Products ASX SETTLEMENT

Workshop 4PBB First Steps for the perpetual pavement design: through the analysis of the fatigue life

Temporal Trends in Forest Fire Season Length

Technical Report Documentation Page 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. 1. Report No. FHWA/TX-12/

DRAFT. Climate Regions for Mechanistic - Empirical Pavement Design in California and Expected Effects on Performance. Report Prepared for

PRELIMINARY DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES

PROGRESS ACCOMPLISHED THIS PERIOD

Time Series Analysis

Location. Datum. Survey. information. Etrometa. Step Gauge. Description. relative to Herne Bay is -2.72m. The site new level.

The Climate of Marshall County

Location. Datum. Survey. information. Etrometa. Step Gauge. Description. relative to Herne Bay is -2.72m. The site new level.

2015 Fall Conditions Report

Suppression of colonies of Reticulitermes spp. using the Sentricon termite colony elimination system: : A case study in Chatsworth, CA

ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SPONSORSHIP

Determine the trend for time series data

PREDICTING SOIL SUCTION PROFILES USING PREVAILING WEATHER

2002 Pavement Design

YACT (Yet Another Climate Tool)? The SPI Explorer

Mechanistic Analysis of Rigid Pavement for Temperature Stresses Using Ansys

Transcription:

AASHTO Rigid Pavement Design Dr. Antonis Michael Frederick University Notes Courtesy of Dr. Christos Drakos University of Florida 1. Introduction Empirical design based on the AASHO road test: Over 200 test sections JPCP (15 spacing) and JRPC (40 spacing) Range of slab thickness: 2.5 to 12.5 inches Subbase type: untreated gravel/sand with plastic fines Subbase thickness; 0 to 9 inches Subgrade soil: siltyclay (A6) Monitored PSI w/ load applications developed regression eqn s Number of load applications: 1,114,000

2. General Design Variables Design Period Traffic what changes? ( Reliability Based on functional classification Overall standard deviation (S 0 =0.25 0.35) Performance criteria PSI = PSI 0 PSI t 3. Material Properties 3.1 Effective Modulus of Subgrade Reaction (k) Need to convert subgrade M R to k: 1. 2. 3. 3.1.1 Pavement Without Subbase If there is no Subbase, AASHTO suggests: Correlation based on 30in plateload tests k value becomes too high because k=fnc(1/a) More accurate k if plate test was run w/ bigger plates; too expensive & impractical 3.1.2 Pavement With Subbase k PCC SUBBASE SUBGRADE If subbase exists, need to determine the BEDROCK

3.1.2 Pavement With Subbase (cont.) Example: Subbase thickness=10 Subbase modulus= psi Subgrade M R = psi To get k: Figure 12.18 3.1.3 Rigid Foundation @ Shallow Depth If bedrock is within 10ft, it will Figure 12.19 Example: Rigid depth=5 From prev. page: Subgrade M R = psi k = 600 pci

3.1.4 Effective Modulus of Subgrade Reaction K eff Equivalent modulus that would result in the same damage if seasonal variations were taken into account (similar to flexible design) u r = 0.75 0.25 ( D 0.39k ) 3. 42 Month k u r 1 500 33.5 2 450 32.5...... _ u r = n u r n xxx yy.y 3.1.5 K eff Example Month Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Subgrade Modulus, M R (psi) 12,000 12,000 7,000 7,000 Subbase Modulus, E SB (psi) Figure 12.18 Figure 12.19 Composite k value, k (pci) 700 700 400 400 Rigid Foundation, k (pci) Relative Damage, u r 31.84 31.84 43.45 43.45 Σu r 444.41

3.1.5 K eff Example (cont.) _ u r u = n D = 8in r 444.41 = = 37.03 12 Figure 12.20 3.1.6 Loss of Support (LS) Reduction of k eff by a factor LS to account for Best case scenario,

3.1.7 Table for Estimating K eff 20,000 100,000 Fig. 12.18 Fig. 12.19 EQUATION 15,000 100,000 3.2 Portland Cement Concrete (PCC) Elastic Modulus of Concrete (E c ): Correlated with compressive strength Modulus of Rupture (S c ): Thirdpoint loading @ 28 days

3.3 Pavement Structure Characteristics Drainage Coefficient (C d ): Quality of drainage & percent time exposed to moisture (Table 12.20) Load Transfer Coefficient (J): Ability to transfer loads across joints and cracks (Table 12.19) Lower J 4. Thickness Design 4.1 Input Variables Modulus of Subgrade Reaction, k eff =70 pci Traffic, W 18 =5 million Design Reliability, R =95% Overall Standard Deviation, S 0 =0.30 PSI =1.7 Elastic Modulus, E c =5,000,000 psi Modulus of Rupture, S c =650 psi Load Transfer Coefficient, J =3.3 Drainage Coefficient, C d =1.0 Use Nomograph (Figures 12.17a&b) or solve equation

4.2 Nomograph 4.2 Nomograph

4.3 Equation W 18 := 5000000 Z R := 1.645 S 0 := 0.3 PSI := 1.7 k := 70 S c := 650 J := 3.3 C d := 1.0 p t := 2.8 E c := 5000000 D := 4.5 Given ( ) ( Z R S 0 ) 7.35 log D + 1 log W 18 Find( D) = 9.9 PSI log 4.5 1.5 + ( ) 0.06 + + 1.624 10 7 4.22 0.32 p t 1 + ( D + 1) 8.46 ( ) log ( ) S c C d D 0.75 1.132 215.63 J D 0.75 18.42 0.25 E c k 5. Other Design Features 5.1 Slab Length 5.1.1 Jointed Plain Concrete Pavement (JPCP) Governed by

5.1.2 Jointed Reinforced Concrete Pavement (JRPC) Always doweled Use same typical values from before: L 0. 25 L = 6 C α T + ε 0. 65 5. 5 10 60 + 1. 0 10 = L 75ft 4 ( ) ( ) t δ = 894 Guideline 5.1.3 JRCP Reinforcement If (when) concrete cracks, steel picks up stress faγclh A s = 2f s Where: A s = Area of required steel per unit width f s = Allowable stress in steel f a = Average friction coefficient between slab and foundation Example 40 24 tie bars γ c = 0.0868 pci h = 10 in f a = 1.5 f s = 43,000

5.1.3 JRCP Reinforcement (cont) 5. Design Example Given the following information: Roadbed soil M R : 20,000 psi (December January) 8,000 psi (February March) 15,000 psi (April November) Subbase Information: Loss of Support =0.5 Friction factor =1.5 Thickness =6 inches Elastic Modulus =100,000 psi Design Factors: Design Reliability, R =90% Overall Standard Deviation, S 0 =0.40 PSI =1.5 Traffic =37.9 million ESAL Drainage coefficient =1.0 Shoulders =10ft wide PCC Temperature drop =55 o F

5. Design Example (cont) PCC: Elastic Modulus, E c = 4,500,000 psi Modulus of Rupture, S c = 725 psi Limestone rock Indirect Tensile Strength = 500 psi Design a JPCP (w/o dowels) and a JRCP (35ft, w/ dowels). For each pavement determine the slab thickness, joint spacing (for the JCPC), and reinforcement (mesh designation for the JRCP) 5.1 Effective modulus of subgrade reaction Next page