arxiv: v2 [astro-ph.sr] 29 Mar 2011

Similar documents
arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.sr] 11 Oct 2012

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph] 2 Oct 2007

Meridional Flow, Torsional Oscillations, and the Solar Magnetic Cycle

Solar Cycle Prediction and Reconstruction. Dr. David H. Hathaway NASA/Ames Research Center

1. INTRODUCTION 2. NOISE ASSESSMENT

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.sr] 31 Jul 2014

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.sr] 23 Apr 2014

Time-Distance Imaging of Solar Far-Side Active Regions

Solar dynamo theory recent progress, questions and answers

Probing Magnetic Fields in the Solar Convection Zone with Meridional Flow

A Standard Law for the Equatorward Drift of the Sunspot Zones

CONSTRAINTS ON THE APPLICABILITY OF AN INTERFACE DYNAMO TO THE SUN

EVIDENCE THAT A DEEP MERIDIONAL FLOW SETS THE SUNSPOT CYCLE PERIOD David H. Hathaway. Dibyendu Nandy. and Robert M. Wilson and Edwin J.

Local helioseismology using ring diagram analysis

Predicting a solar cycle before its onset using a flux transport dynamo model

Supercomputers simulation of solar granulation

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph] 14 Oct 2007

Predicting the Solar Cycle 24 with a Solar Dynamo Model

On the role of asymmetries in the reversal of the solar magnetic field

Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics

Parity of solar global magnetic field determined by turbulent diffusivity

Geomagnetic activity indicates large amplitude for sunspot cycle 24

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.sr] 16 Nov 2016

arxiv: v2 [astro-ph.sr] 20 Dec 2016

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 31 Oct 2006

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.sr] 21 Apr 2011

Solar Cycle Propagation, Memory, and Prediction Insights from a Century of Magnetic Proxies

From Active Region to Polar Field: Understanding Solar Cycle Magnetic Evolution with Measured Near-Surface Flows ABSTRACT

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.sr] 6 Aug 2009

4+ YEARS OF SCIENTIFIC RESULTS WITH SDO/HMI

Unusual Migration of Prominence Activities in the Southern Hemisphere during Cycles 23 24

The Synchronic Frame of Photospheric Magnetic field: The Improved Synoptic Frame

A PROPOSED PARADIGM FOR SOLAR CYCLE DYNAMICS MEDIATED VIA TURBULENT PUMPING OF MAGNETIC FLUX IN BABCOCK-LEIGHTON TYPE SOLAR DYNAMOS

The Synchronic Frame of Photospheric Magnetic field: The Improved Synoptic Frame

Meridional Flow, Differential Rotation, and the Solar Dynamo

Time Distance Study of Isolated Sunspots

L. A. Upton. Heliophysics Summer School. July 27 th 2016

Magnetic Field Elements at High Latitude: Lifetime and Rotation Rate

arxiv: v2 [astro-ph.sr] 19 Jun 2015

Chapter 1. Introduction. 1.1 Motivation

THE SUN S PREFERRED LONGITUDES AND THE COUPLING OF MAGNETIC DYNAMO MODES

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.sr] 21 Apr 2013

Helioseismology. Jesper Schou Max Planck Institute for Solar System Research

MERIDIONAL CIRCULATION DYNAMICS FROM 3D MAGNETOHYDRODYNAMIC GLOBAL SIMULATIONS OF SOLAR CONVECTION

Impact of changes in the Sun s conveyor belt on recent solar cycles

The Origin of the Solar Cycle & Helioseismology

Latitude-time distribution of the solar magnetic fields from 1975 to 2006

North-South Offset of Heliospheric Current Sheet and its Causes

Studies of Solar Magnetic Cycle and Differential Rotation Based on Mean Field Model. Hideyuki Hotta

Key words: sunspot cycle solar dynamo Gnevyshev gap Spörer's law

Solar cycle & Dynamo Modeling

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.sr] 5 May 2012

The Waldmeier effect and the flux transport solar dynamo

arxiv: v2 [astro-ph.sr] 11 Oct 2011

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.sr] 3 Nov 2010

A necessary extension of the surface flux transport model. I. Baumann, D. Schmitt, and M. Schüssler ABSTRACT

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.sr] 8 Dec 2016

SOLAR DIFFERENTIAL ROTATION INFLUENCED BY LATITUDINAL ENTROPY VARIATIONS IN THE TACHOCLINE

Solar Structure. Connections between the solar interior and solar activity. Deep roots of solar activity

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 24 Jul 2001

Solar Magnetism. Arnab Rai Choudhuri. Department of Physics Indian Institute of Science

Kine%c helicity and anisotropic turbulent stresses of solar supergranula%on

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 11 Oct 2005

Recovering Solar Toroidal Field Dynamics From Sunspot Location Patterns. Aimee A. Norton and Peter A. Gilman

Sunspot Groups as Tracers of Sub-Surface Processes

Towards Waveform Heliotomography: Observing Interactions of Helioseismic Waves with a Sunspot

Logistics 2/14/17. Topics for Today and Thur. Helioseismology: Millions of sound waves available to probe solar interior. ASTR 1040: Stars & Galaxies

The Solar Interior. Paul Bushby (Newcastle University) STFC Introductory Course in Solar System Physics Leeds, 06 Sept 2010

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.sr] 20 Sep 2013

Predicting the Solar Cycle

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 18 Jan 2001

Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager for Solar Dynamics Observatory

Received: 16 September 2010 / Accepted: 23 March 2011 / Published online: 4 May 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Solar and stellar dynamo models

A numerical MHD model for the solar tachocline with meridional flow

The Sun s Magnetic Cycle: Current State of our Understanding

Logistics 2/13/18. Topics for Today and Thur+ Helioseismology: Millions of sound waves available to probe solar interior. ASTR 1040: Stars & Galaxies

Modeling the Sun s open magnetic flux. M. Schüssler 1 and I. Baumann 2 ABSTRACT

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.sr] 28 Nov 2016

Motion of magnetic elements at the solar equator observed by SDO/HMI

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Circulation-dominated solar shell dynamo models with positive alpha-effect

Estimate of solar radius from f-mode frequencies

Correlations of magnetic features and the torsional pattern

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.sr] 14 Jan 2019

Astronomy. Astrophysics. Comparison of acoustic travel-time measurements of solar meridional circulation from SDO/HMI and SOHO/MDI

How radial is the photospheric magnetic field?

CARRINGTON COORDINATES AND SOLAR MAPS

arxiv: v3 [astro-ph.sr] 3 Oct 2016

SDO/HMI survey of emerging active regions for helioseismology

arxiv: v2 [astro-ph.sr] 26 Aug 2011

Statistical properties of the Bipolar Magnetic Regions

Lecture 14: Solar Cycle. Observations of the Solar Cycle. Babcock-Leighton Model. Outline

FLUX TRANSPORT SOLAR DYNAMO MODELS, CURRENT PROBLEMS AND POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.sr] 22 Aug 2014

THE DYNAMO EFFECT IN STARS

arxiv: v2 [astro-ph.sr] 4 Feb 2014

CHAPTER 4. THE HADLEY CIRCULATION 59 smaller than that in midlatitudes. This is illustrated in Fig. 4.2 which shows the departures from zonal symmetry

Understanding solar torsional oscillations from global dynamo models

Full-sphere simulations of a circulation-dominated solar dynamo: Exploring the parity issue

Transcription:

The Sun s Shallow Meridional Circulation David H. Hathaway NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, AL 35812 USA arxiv:113.1561v2 [astro-ph.sr] 29 Mar 211 david.hathaway@nasa.gov ABSTRACT The Sun s global meridional circulation is evident as a slow poleward flow at its surface. This flow is observed to carry magnetic elements poleward- producing thesun spolarmagneticfieldsasakeypartofthe11-yearsunspot cycle. Current theories for the sunspot cycle assume that this surface flow is part of a circulation which sinks inward at the poles and turns equatorward at depths below 1 Mm. Here we use the advection of the Sun s convection cells by the meridional flow to map the flow velocity in latitude and depth. Our measurements show the largest cells clearly moving equatorward at depths below 35 Mm - the base of the Sun s surface shear layer. This surprisingly shallow return flow indicates the need for substantial revisions to solar/stellar dynamo theory. Subject headings: Sun: dynamo, Sun: rotation, Sun: surface magnetism 1. INTRODUCTION The Sun s meridional circulation has been a part of solar magnetic dynamo theory for half a century. A poleward meridional flow from the Sun s mid latitudes was invoked in the earliest models (long before the flow was actually measured) to transport magnetic elements from decaying sunspot regions to the poles where they would erode the opposite polarity magnetic field from the old sunspot cycle and build up the polar fields of the new sunspot cycle (Babcock 1961). This surface meridional flow, along with its latitudinal structure and variation in time, is now well observed (Topka et al. 1982; Komm et al. 1993; Hathaway et al. 1996; Hathaway & Rightmire 21, 211) and its role in the surface magnetic flux transport is well established (DeVore & Sheeley 1987; van Ballegooijen et al. 1998; Schrijver & Title 21). Dynamo theories over the last decade and a half have assumed that the mass traveling poleward in the surface layers sinks inward at the poles and returns to the equator along the base of the Sun s convection zone at a depth of 2 Mm. In these theories this slow, dense, equatorward flow is responsible for the equatorward drift of sunspot

2 activity (Dikpati & Choudhuri 1994; Dikpati & Charbonneau 1999; Nandy & Choudhuri 21). Dynamo models based on this deep meridional circulation have recently been used to predict the currently emerging sunspot cycle, albeit with disparate results (Dikpati et al. 26; Choudhuri et al. 27). The meridional flow is difficult to measure. Its amplitude ( 1 2 m s 1 ) is more than an order of magnitude weaker than that of the other major flows observed on the surface of the Sun. The axisymmetric longitudinal flow, differential rotation, has a dynamic range of 2 m s 1 and the non-axisymmetric cellular convection flows have typical velocities of several hundred m s 1. The meridional flow is observed to be poleward from the equator with peak flow speeds in the mid latitudes. The flow amplitude measured from Doppler shifts of spectral lines formed at the surface is 2 m s 1 (Hathaway et al. 1996; Ulrich 21) while the amplitude found by measuring the motions of the small magnetic featuresis 12 m s 1 (Komm et al. 1993;Hathaway & Rightmire 21,211). The meridional flow can also be measured using the methods of local helioseismology which yield a peak velocity of 2 m s 1 that appears to be constant with depth down to 26 Mm (Giles et al. 1997; Schou & Bogart 1998). Recently, however, two new measurement methods have indicated a decrease in amplitude with depth. A method using global helioseismology (Mitra-Kraev & Thompson 27) found a meridional flow that decreased with depth and became equatorward at a depth of only 4 Mm - but with a large range of error. A method using the movement of the larger solar convection cells, supergranules, also found a meridional flow that decreased with depth but without precise depth information and without detection of a return flow (Hathaway et al. 21). While some helioseismic studies indicate a poleward meridional flow at depths well below 26 Mm, Duvall & Hanasoge (29) found that those methods are prone to systematic errors and Gough & Hindman (21) conclude that the flow below 3 Mm remains unknown. Furthermore Beckers (27) has suggested that projection effects may have also compromised some of the local helioseismology results and concludes that the meridional flow velocity may decrease with depth. Here we measure the meridional flow by tracking the motions of supergranules, but extend the analysis to include larger cells with deeper roots. Numerical models of compressible convection with radiative transfer in the near surface layers (Stein & Nordlund 2) clearly show that small cells dominate at the surface and larger structures are found at increasing depth. Supergranules cover the surface of the Sun and have a broad range of sizes that sample a corresponding range of depths. We measure the motion of the pattern of supergranules by analyzing data acquired by the Michelson Doppler Imager (MDI) (Scherrer et al. 1995) on the ESA/NASA Solar and Heliospheric Observatory (SOHO) satellite in 1996 and 1997.

3 2. DATA PREPARATION The data consist of 124x124 pixel images of the line-of-sight velocity determined from the Doppler shift of a spectral line due to the trace element nickel in the solar atmosphere. The images are acquired at a 1 min cadence. We average them over 31 min with a Gaussian weighting function which filters out any velocity components that vary on time scales less than about 16 min. We then map these temporally filtered images onto a 124x124 grid in heliographic latitude from pole to pole and in longitude ±9 from the central meridian (Figure 1). This mapping accounts for the position angle of the Sun s rotation axis relative to the imaging CCD and the tilt angle of the Sun s rotation axis toward or away from the spacecraft. Both of these angles include modification for the most recent determinations of the orientation of the Sun s rotation axis (Beck & Giles 25; Hathaway & Rightmire 21). We analyze data obtained during two 6+ day periods of continuous coverage - one in 1996 from May 24 to July 24 and another in 1997 from April 14 to June 18. We also generate and analyze simulated data to assist in our determination of the representative depths. We construct the simulated data from an evolving spectrum of vector spherical harmonics in such a manner as to reproduce the spatial, spectral, and temporal behavior of the observed cellular flows (Hathaway et al. 21). The cells are advected in longitude by differential rotation and in latitude by meridional flow, both of which vary with cell size. 3. DATA ANALYSIS AND RESULTS We determine the motions of the cellular patterns in longitude and latitude for strips of data by finding the displacement of the maximum in the cross-correlation with similar strips from images acquired at time lags of 2, 4, 8, 16, 24, and 32 hr. Each strip is 11 pixels or 2 high in latitude and 6 pixels or 15 long in longitude. We repeat this procedure for 796 latitude positions between ±7 latitude and for each hour over the 6 days of each MDI dataset and 6 days of simulated data. This cross-correlation method was first used to determine the equatorial rotation rate by Duvall (198) who concluded that larger cells live longer and rotated faster. Beck & Schou (2) used a 2D Fourier transform method and found a rotation rate that increased with the wavelength of the features. We calculate the average differential rotation and meridional flow profiles and fit them with 4th order polynomials in sinθ where θ is the heliographic latitude (Figure 2). The rotational velocity increases with increasing time lags to a maximum at 24 hr but then decreases at 32 hr. The meridional flow velocity decreases with time lag and, at the 32 hr

4 Fig. 1. Heliographic map details of the line-of-sight (Doppler) velocity from SOHO/MDI (top) and from the data simulation (bottom). Each map detail extends 9 in longitude from the central meridian on the left and about 35 in latitude from the equator (the thick horizontal line). The mottled pattern is the Doppler signal (blue for blue shifts and red for red shifts) due to the supergranule convection cells. The latitudinal movement of these supergranules yields a measurement of the Sun s meridional circulation. time lag, reverses sign. The cellular flows that live long enough to be positively correlated 32 hrs later are moving equatorward. This is a clear detection of the meridional return flow. The individual data points have a standard error of 1 m s 1 but the vast majority of points indicate an equatorward flow significantly bigger than this. The curves fit through the data points indicate an equatorward return flow of 1.8 m s 1 with a standard error of <.2 m s 1. We determine the characteristic convection cell wavelengths for the different time lags using the wavelength dependence of the differential rotation and meridional flow profiles used in the simulation. The differential rotation measurements are largely reproduced with a relatively simple rotation velocity, u, relative to an inertial (sidereal) frame of reference given by

5 u(θ,λ) = [(198 246sin 2 θ 365sin 4 θ)cosθ] [1.+.46tanh(λ/35)] m s 1 (1) where the wavelength, λ, is given in Mm. (Note that the prograde velocities plotted in Figure 2 are relative to a frame of reference rotating at the Carrington rotation rate with u C (θ) = 1991 cos θ.) The meridional flow measurements are largely reproduced with a northward velocity, v, given by v(θ,λ) = [(65sinθ 78sin 3 θ)cosθ] [tanh((35 λ)/2)] m s 1 (2) where the reproduction of the return flow is particularly sensitive to the zero crossing occurring at 35 Mm. Figure 3 shows the equatorial differential rotation velocity relative to the surface and the meridionalflowvelocityat3 latitudealongwiththedatapointsfromthemdi(averagedfor the two years) and simulation data analyses. The data points from the simulation virtually coincide with those from the MDI data except at the 32 hr time lag and for the northward velocity at the 16 hr time lag. No doubt, better fits could beobtained with more complicated flow profiles. It is apparent, however, that the differential rotation velocity must decrease for wavelengths greater than 35 Mm and that the reversal in the meridional flow direction must be more abrupt. Figure 3 also shows that the points do not fall right on the curves for the input flow profiles. We attribute this to two different processes. The two latitudes chosen for this figure represent the latitudes at which each flow reaches its maximum. Since the convection cells span a finite range of latitudes the measured values should be less than these maxima. However, the differential rotation signal is subject to an additional line-of-sight projection effect(hathaway et al. 26) which makes the Doppler features appear to rotate faster. This effect raises the measured values to increasingly higher values with increasing wavelength for the prograde velocity. 4. CONCLUSIONS The relationship between the wavelength of a convection cell and the depth at which it is anchored or steered is well constrained by the stability of the surface shear layer and

6 observations of the rotation rate with depth from global helioiseismology. An increase in rotation rate with depth has long been suggested by observations and is attributed to the conservation of angular momentum for fluid elements moving inward and outward in the near surface layers (Foukal & Jokipii 1975; Gilman & Foukal 1979; Hathaway 1982). However, a rotation rate which increases inward faster than that given by the conservation of angular momentum is dynamically unstable (Chandrasekhar 1961). Measurements of this rotation rate increase from helioseismology (Schou et al. 1998; Corbard & Thompson 22) indicate that it follows this critical gradient to depths of 1-15 Mm. This gradient (the dashed line in Figure 3) and the helioseismicly determined rotation rates (open circles in Figure 3) are matched by the simulation input rotation profile if we assume that the convection cells are anchored at depths equal to their widths. Shallower cells would give unstable gradients. The mass density increases nearly quadratically with depth so it is reasonable to expect the cells to be advected by the flows near their deepest extent. This association between cell wavelength and depth indicates that the poleward meridionalflowseenatthesurfacereverses atadepthof35mm-thebaseofthesurfaceshear layer where the rotation rate reaches its maximum. Although this shallow return flow violates the assumptions of flux transport dynamos(dikpati & Choudhuri 1994; Dikpati & Charbonneau 1999; Nandy & Choudhuri 21; Dikpati et al. 26; Choudhuri et al. 27), it was predicted by numerical simulations of the effects of rotation on supergranules (Hathaway 1982), it is in agreement with global helioseismology, and it helps to reconcile other observations. The surface has the slowest rotation and the fastest meridional flow. Small magnetic elements rotate faster than the surface and have poleward meridional flow which is slower than the surface (Komm et al. 1993; Hathaway & Rightmire 21, 211). Both velocity components for the small magnetic elements are matched at a depth of about 15 Mm. While supergranules do have a broad range of sizes, their spectrum exhibits an excess of power at wavelengths of 3-35 Mm (Hathaway et al. 2). Our results indicate that cells this size have depths roughly equal to the depth of the surface shear layer. This hardly seems coincidental but rather suggests an intimate connection between the characteristic size of supergranules and the depth of the surface shear layer. A meridional circulation confined to the surface shear layer would also explain why numerical simulations of the solar convection zone below this surface shear layer have had difficulty producing the observed flows (Miesch et al. 2). In particular, the meridional circulations in these simulations are highly structured in latitude and highly variable in time. The source of this structure and variability can be attributed to the small number ( 1) of convection cells that populate the simulated volume. A meridional circulation driven by ( 1) supergranules - the convection cells that populate the surface shear layer - is far

7 more likely to be less structured and variable. This detection of a shallow equatorward return flow for the Sun s meridional circulation indicates the need for a reassessment of solar dynamo theory. The flux transport dynamo models, all of which assume and require a deep meridional flow, apparently cannot be correct. While other dynamo models exist, the majority of these place the dynamo action at the base of the convection zone with a possible secondary and less organized dynamo in the surface shear layer. Upon reassessment we may find that the surface shear layer plays a far more important role in the global dynamo. The author would like to thank NASA for its support of this research through a grant from the Heliophysics Causes and Consequences of the Minimum of Solar Cycle 23/24 Program to NASA Marshall Space Flight Center. He is also indebted to Ron Moore and Lisa Rightmire who read and commented on the manuscript. SOHO, is a project of international cooperation between ESA and NASA. Babcock, H. W. 1961, ApJ 133, 572 Beck, J. G., & Giles, P. 25, ApJ 621, L153 REFERENCES Beck, J. G., & Schou, J. 2, Sol. Phys. 193, 333 Beckers, J. M. 27, Sol. Phys. 24, 3 Chandrasekhar 1961, Hydrodynamic and Hydromagnetic Stability Oxford University Press, London Choudhuri, A. R., Chatterjee, P., & Jiang, J. 27, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 13113-1 Corbard, T., & Thompson, M. J. 22, Sol. Phys. 25, 211 DeVore, C. R., & Sheeley, N. R., Jr. 1987, Sol. Phys. 18, 47 Dikpati, M., & Choudhuri, A. R. 1994, A&A 291, 975 Dikpati, M., & Charbonneau, P. 1999, ApJ 518, 58 Dikpati, M., de Toma, G., & Gilman, P. A. 26, Geophys. Res. Lett. 33, L512 Duvall, T. L., Jr. 198, Sol. Phys. 66, 213

8 Duvall, T. L., Jr. & Hanasoge, S. M. 29, arxiv:95.3132 Foukal, P., & Jokipii, R. 1975, ApJ 199, L71 Giles, P. M., Duvall, T. L., Jr., Scherrer, P. H., & Bogart, R. S. 1997, Nature 39, 52 Gilman, P. A., & Foukal, P. 1979, ApJ 229, 1179 Gough, D. O., & Hindman, B. W. 21, ApJ 714, 96 Hathaway, D. H. 1982, Sol. Phys. 77, 341 Hathaway, D. H. et al. 1996, Science 272, 136 Hathaway, D. H., Beck, J. G., Bogart, R. S., Bachmann, K. T., Khatri, G., Petitto, J. M., Han, S., & Raymond, J. 2, Sol. Phys. 193, 299 Hathaway, D. H. & Rightmire, L. 21, Science 327, 135 Hathaway, D. H. & Rightmire, L. 211, ApJ 729, 8 Hathaway, D. H., Williams, & Cuntz, M. 26, ApJ 644, 598 Hathaway, D. H., Williams, P. E., Dela Rosa, K., & Cuntz, M. 21, ApJ 725, 182 Komm, R. W., Howard, R. F., & Harvey, J. W. 1993, Sol. Phys. 147, 27 Miesch, M. S., Elliott, J. R., Toomre, J., Clune, T. L., Glatzmaier, G. A., Gilman, P. A. 2, ApJ 532, 593 Mitra-Kraev, U. & Thompson, M. J. 27, Astron. Nachr. 328, 19 Nandy, D. & Choudhuri, A. R. 212, Science 296, 1671 Scherrer, P. H., et al. 1995, Sol. Phys. 162, 129 Schou, J. & Bogart, R. S. 1998, ApJ 54, L131 Schou, J. et al. 1998, ApJ 55, 39 Schrijver, C. J. & Title A. M. 21, ApJ 551, 199 Stein, R. F. & Nordlund, Å., Sol. Phys. 192, 91 Topka, K., Moore, R., LaBonte, B. J., & Howard, R. 1982, Sol. Phys. 79, 231 Ulrich, R. K. 21, ApJ 725, 658

9 van Ballegooijen, A. A., Cartledge, N. P., & Priest, E. R. 1998, ApJ 51, 866 This preprint was prepared with the AAS L A TEX macros v5.2.

1-6 -3 3 Northward Velocity (m s-1) 2 2 6 1-2 -9-6 -3 3 2 2 6-2 -9-6 -3 3 2 6 2-1 -15-6 -3 3 9 6 9 1997 5-5 2-1 -15-6 -3 3 1 1-5 -2-9 9 SIM -1 1 1997-1 1996 5-2 -9 9 Prograde Velocity (m s-1) -1 Prograde Velocity (m s-1) 1-2 -9 Northward Velocity (m s-1) 1 1996 Prograde Velocity (m s-1) Northward Velocity (m s-1) 2 6 9 SIM 5-5 2-1 -15-2 -9-6 -3 3 6 9 Fig. 2. Flow profiles as functions of latitude from the 1996 SOHO/MDI data (top row), the 1997 SOHO/MDI data (middle row), and the simulated data (bottom row). The flow velocities measured at each latitude are shown with colored dots for each time lag as indicated in the figure. The solid lines with the same color coding represent the 4th order polynomial fits to each profile. The meridional flow decreases in amplitude with increasing time lag and reverses direction for 32 hr lags. The rotation rate increases as the time lag increases up to 24 hr then drops at 32 hr.

11 Northward Velocity (m s -1 ) 2 1 SIM Input Profile MDI Data SIM Data -1 1 2 3 4 5 Wavelength λ (Mm) Prograde Velocity (m s -1 ) 1 8 6 4 2 Schou et al. Data SIM Input Profile Shear Limit MDI Data SIM Data 2 1 2 3 4 5 Wavelength λ (Mm) Fig. 3. The simulation meridional flow speed at 3 latitude (top) and equatorial differential rotation relative to the surface (bottom) as functions of wavelength are shown by the solid lines. The observed values from the cross-correlation analysis with the MDI data and the simulated data (filled circles and crosses respectively) are shown at their characteristic wavelengths. Error bars centered on each symbol represent 2σ errors. The dashed line shows thetheoretical limit to therateofincrease inrotationrateattheequator andtheopencircles show the rotation velocity determined from global helioseismology by Schou et al. (1998) both assuming that the wavelength equals the anchoring depth of the cells.