SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR VOLUMETRIC Z-TEST FOR PROPORTIONS

Similar documents
Chapter 8. Inferences about More Than Two Population Central Values

{ }{ ( )} (, ) = ( ) ( ) ( ) Chapter 14 Exercises in Sampling Theory. Exercise 1 (Simple random sampling): Solution:

Econometric Methods. Review of Estimation

Multiple Choice Test. Chapter Adequacy of Models for Regression

22 Nonparametric Methods.

Chapter 13, Part A Analysis of Variance and Experimental Design. Introduction to Analysis of Variance. Introduction to Analysis of Variance

Summary of the lecture in Biostatistics

Chapter 3 Sampling For Proportions and Percentages

Continuous Distributions

hp calculators HP 30S Statistics Averages and Standard Deviations Average and Standard Deviation Practice Finding Averages and Standard Deviations

2.28 The Wall Street Journal is probably referring to the average number of cubes used per glass measured for some population that they have chosen.

CHAPTER VI Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

The TDT. (Transmission Disequilibrium Test) (Qualitative and quantitative traits) D M D 1 M 1 D 2 M 2 M 2D1 M 1

STA 105-M BASIC STATISTICS (This is a multiple choice paper.)

ρ < 1 be five real numbers. The

1 Onto functions and bijections Applications to Counting

UNIVERSITY OF OSLO DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS

UNIVERSITY OF OSLO DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS

best estimate (mean) for X uncertainty or error in the measurement (systematic, random or statistical) best

Multiple Linear Regression Analysis

i 2 σ ) i = 1,2,...,n , and = 3.01 = 4.01

UNIT 4 SOME OTHER SAMPLING SCHEMES

MEASURES OF DISPERSION

Lecture 3. Sampling, sampling distributions, and parameter estimation

Ordinary Least Squares Regression. Simple Regression. Algebra and Assumptions.

STATISTICAL PROPERTIES OF LEAST SQUARES ESTIMATORS. x, where. = y - ˆ " 1

Discrete Mathematics and Probability Theory Fall 2016 Seshia and Walrand DIS 10b

Lecture 7. Confidence Intervals and Hypothesis Tests in the Simple CLR Model

Random Variables and Probability Distributions

Class 13,14 June 17, 19, 2015

: At least two means differ SST

STA 108 Applied Linear Models: Regression Analysis Spring Solution for Homework #1

Permutation Tests for More Than Two Samples

Chapter 8: Statistical Analysis of Simulated Data

Lecture 1. (Part II) The number of ways of partitioning n distinct objects into k distinct groups containing n 1,

ENGI 4421 Propagation of Error Page 8-01

Lecture 1 Review of Fundamental Statistical Concepts

Assignment 5/MATH 247/Winter Due: Friday, February 19 in class (!) (answers will be posted right after class)

The expected value of a sum of random variables,, is the sum of the expected values:

Chapter 4 Multiple Random Variables

STA302/1001-Fall 2008 Midterm Test October 21, 2008

LECTURE - 4 SIMPLE RANDOM SAMPLING DR. SHALABH DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS AND STATISTICS INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY KANPUR

Simulation Output Analysis

18.413: Error Correcting Codes Lab March 2, Lecture 8

Multiple Regression. More than 2 variables! Grade on Final. Multiple Regression 11/21/2012. Exam 2 Grades. Exam 2 Re-grades

Simple Linear Regression

Third handout: On the Gini Index

Lecture Notes Types of economic variables

TESTS BASED ON MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD

ε. Therefore, the estimate

Objectives of Multiple Regression

PROPERTIES OF GOOD ESTIMATORS

Statistics Descriptive and Inferential Statistics. Instructor: Daisuke Nagakura

Chapter 5 Properties of a Random Sample

Functions of Random Variables

PTAS for Bin-Packing

Quantitative analysis requires : sound knowledge of chemistry : possibility of interferences WHY do we need to use STATISTICS in Anal. Chem.?

X X X E[ ] E X E X. is the ()m n where the ( i,)th. j element is the mean of the ( i,)th., then

Dr. Shalabh Department of Mathematics and Statistics Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur

1. The weight of six Golden Retrievers is 66, 61, 70, 67, 92 and 66 pounds. The weight of six Labrador Retrievers is 54, 60, 72, 78, 84 and 67.

Mean is only appropriate for interval or ratio scales, not ordinal or nominal.

ESS Line Fitting

Chapter -2 Simple Random Sampling

Bayes (Naïve or not) Classifiers: Generative Approach

Descriptive Statistics

THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY GRADUATE DIPLOMA

CHAPTER 4 RADICAL EXPRESSIONS

Lecture 3 Probability review (cont d)

Chapter Statistics Background of Regression Analysis

f f... f 1 n n (ii) Median : It is the value of the middle-most observation(s).

= 1. UCLA STAT 13 Introduction to Statistical Methods for the Life and Health Sciences. Parameters and Statistics. Measures of Centrality

Lecture 8: Linear Regression

Chapter 11 The Analysis of Variance

Lecture Notes 2. The ability to manipulate matrices is critical in economics.

THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY HIGHER CERTIFICATE

Chapter -2 Simple Random Sampling

Chapter 11 Systematic Sampling

GOALS The Samples Why Sample the Population? What is a Probability Sample? Four Most Commonly Used Probability Sampling Methods

Some Applications of the Resampling Methods in Computational Physics

Point Estimation: definition of estimators

THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY GRADUATE DIPLOMA

The Occupancy and Coupon Collector problems

Bounds on the expected entropy and KL-divergence of sampled multinomial distributions. Brandon C. Roy

Lecture 02: Bounding tail distributions of a random variable

UNIVERSITY OF EAST ANGLIA. Main Series UG Examination

THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY 2016 EXAMINATIONS SOLUTIONS HIGHER CERTIFICATE MODULE 5

Simple Linear Regression

Lecture 1: Introduction to Regression

CLASS NOTES. for. PBAF 528: Quantitative Methods II SPRING Instructor: Jean Swanson. Daniel J. Evans School of Public Affairs

12.2 Estimating Model parameters Assumptions: ox and y are related according to the simple linear regression model

ENGI 4421 Joint Probability Distributions Page Joint Probability Distributions [Navidi sections 2.5 and 2.6; Devore sections

Example: Multiple linear regression. Least squares regression. Repetition: Simple linear regression. Tron Anders Moger

2SLS Estimates ECON In this case, begin with the assumption that E[ i

ECONOMETRIC THEORY. MODULE VIII Lecture - 26 Heteroskedasticity

Median as a Weighted Arithmetic Mean of All Sample Observations

Simple Linear Regression - Scalar Form

Sampling Theory MODULE V LECTURE - 14 RATIO AND PRODUCT METHODS OF ESTIMATION

Statistics: Unlocking the Power of Data Lock 5

Lecture 2: The Simple Regression Model

Unimodality Tests for Global Optimization of Single Variable Functions Using Statistical Methods

Transcription:

SPECIAL CONSIDERAIONS FOR VOLUMERIC Z-ES FOR PROPORIONS Oe s stctve reacto to the questo of whether two percetages are sgfcatly dfferet from each other s to treat them as f they were proportos whch the deomator s the sample sze ad the umerator has a bomal dstrbuto, ad the apply the stadard statstcal test for sgfcat dfferece of proportos. But fact that s ot the case. Cosder the followg example. A respodet s asked how may bottles of each of 5 soft drks he cosumes a week. Hs data the gets summarzed to 5 percetages, amely hs cosumpto percetage of each of the soft drks. he average of these percetages s calculated across a radom sample of respodets, ad the questo of whether the average percetage of Coke s sgfcatly dfferet from that of Peps. Now cosder a secod example. A radom sample of respodets s asked four questos, () Have you ever eate at the Rtz-Carleto restaurat? () Have you ever eate at the Four Seasos restaurat? (3) What fast-food restaurats have you vsted the last moth? (3) For each of these restaurats, how may bottles of Coke dd you buy? For each of the respodets who ever ate at the Rtz-Carleto the total umber of bottles of Coke purchased are calculated for each fast-food restaurat. Smlarly, for each of the respodets who ever ate at the Four Seasos the total umber of bottles of Coke purchased are calculated for each fast-food restaurat. (Of course, there are respodets who ate at both the Rtz-Carleto ad the Four Seasos.) From these oe calculates, for example, the percetage of Coke bottles purchased at McDoald s by respodets who ate at the Rtz-Carleto ad who ate at the Four Seasos. he statstcal questo s whether the percetage of Coke purchased at McDoald s s sgfcatly dfferet for Rtz-Carleto ad Four Seasos patros. Now cosder a thrd example. A radom sample of respodets s asked two questos, () What fast-food restaurats have you vsted the last moth? () For each of these restaurats, how may bottles of each of a lst of soft drks dd you buy? he total umber of bottles of soft drks, as well as the total umber of bottles of each soft drk, are calculated for each fast-food restaurat. From these oe calculates, for example, the percetage of Coke bottles purchased at McDoald s ad the percetage of Coke bottles purchased at Burger Kg. he statstcal questo s whether the cosumpto percetage of Coke McDoald s s sgfcatly dfferet from the cosumpto percetage of Coke Burger Kg. hese three examples are qualtatvely dfferet, that the frst example the data about brad A are ot depedet of the data about brad B, as they were based o the same respodet (ad addto, sce the percetages have to sum to, the hgher the brad A percetage the lower wll be the brad B percetage). I the secod example, a subset of the respodets wll have bee patros of both the Rtz-Carleto ad Four Seasos restaurats, ad so ther Coke cosumpto McDoald s s detcal! I the thrd example, for those respodets who frequeted both McDoald s ad Burger Kg the Coke cosumptos the two fast-food restaurats are correlated.

What makes them smlar, though, s that what drves these percetages s the uderlyg volumetrc data that forms the bass for the percetage calculato. It s the dstrbuto of these data that determe the dstrbuto of the percetages, ad, tur, the proper method of testg these percetages for sgfcat dffereces. EAMPLE : AVERAGES OF MULINOMIAL PERCENAGES Suppose a respodet s asked to determe hs percetage allocato across p products (e.g., what fracto of hs dollar expedture a gve category does he sped o each product the category?) A sample of respodets s draw ad the average percetage s calculated for each product. Oe ow wats to kow f the percetage for product s sgfcatly dfferet from the percetage for product. We kow frst of all that, for each respodet, the p percetages are correlated, because they are requred to sum to. If p s the percetage for product ad p s the percetage for product for the -th respodet, the the varace of p -p s estmated by v =p (-p ) + p (-p ) + p p = p + p - (p - p ). he varace of the average of the dfferece of these proportos s therefore estmated by v v [ p p ( p p ) ] Now suppose that we have observatos oly o product, observatos oly o product, ad observatos o the par of products. I ths case the average for product s ad the average for product s p p p he varace of the dfferece of these two averages s p p ( p ) p ( p ) p p ( ) ( ) ( )( ) EAMPLE : DEPENDEN PAIRED/OVERLAP (MULI) Suppose we wated to compare the percet that respodets wth a gve attrbute cotrbute to a total of all respodets o that attrbute. For example, suppose colum records the umber of bottles of Coke cosumed a week by people who have ever eate at the Rtz-Carleto, colum

records the umber of bottles of Coke cosumed a week by people who have ever eate at the Four Seasos, the total row cotas the total cosumpto for Coke the respectve colums, ad row cotas the cosumpto for Coke of those respodets that had a specfc attrbute (e.g., Cokes purchased by respodets whose age was betwee 8 ad 35). he percetages questo here are the percetage that Coke purchases make up of the total volume of soft drks purchased amog those 8-35 year old respodets who have ever eate at the Rtz-Carleto restaurat ad that for those who have ever eate at the Four Seasos restaurat. he possble pared/overlap stuato s that there are respodets who have eate at both restaurats. Here s what such a table would look lke: Volume of soft drks purchased by Respodets aged 8 to 35 who have ever eate at Rtz-Carleto 4 Seasos Hyatt ------------ --------- ----- otal 566 5384 568 00.0% 00.0% 00.0% Coke 547 564 603 0.5% 0.6% 0.7% Peps 5459 5058 59 0.6% 9.5% 9.4% Seve Up 53 5664 5566 9.9% 0.6% 9.9% Sprte 5307 5555 66 0.3% 0.4% 0.9% Fata 4535 4638 4897 8.8% 8.7% 8.7% Dr. Pepper 543 5368 5745 0.0% 0.% 0.% Det Peps 5063 53 55 9.8% 9.8% 9.8% Det Coke 547 57 6066 0.6% 0.8% 0.8% Dr. Brow Cherry 4783 480 59 9.3% 9.% 9.% Dr. Brow Cel Ray 534 5505 5907 0.3% 0.4% 0.5% Let us beg wth the attrbute measures that make up the umerator of the percetage. Let us partto the respodets so that the frst respodets provde data for both colums ad (e.g., are betwee 8 ad 35 ad have eate at both the Rtz-Carleto ad Four Seasos restaurats), the ext m respodets provde data oly for colum (e.g., are betwee 8 ad 35 3

ad have oly eate at the Rtz-Carleto), ad the last p respodets provde data oly for colum (e.g., are betwee 8 ad 35 ad have oly eate at the Four Seasos). (here may be stll other respodets that provded data o some, f ot all, of the other baer tems, but ot o tems or. hese wll be dsregarded ths aalyss.) Let us deote by x the observed measuremet for both colums ad for respodet ( =,,, ), y the observed measuremet for respodet ( = +, +,, +m), ad by z the observed measuremet for respodet ( = +m+, +m+,, +m+p). (I assg each of these measuremets dfferet letter ames for clarty of exposto; the data are really a set of +m+p observatos.) he total of the measuremets for that attrbute for those respodg to colum s gve by x y. m ad the total of the measuremets for that attrbute for those respodg to colum s gve by mp x z m Let be the total of the measuremets for those respodg to colum across all attrbutes (e.g., the total Coke cosumpto respodets of all ages who ever ate at the Rtz-Carleto) ad be the total of the measuremets for those respodg to colum across all attrbutes (e.g., the total Coke cosumpto respodets of all ages who ever ate at the Four Seasos). he the percetages uder cosderato are p, p he dfferece of the two percetages s gve by m m ( ) x ( ) my ( ) pz mp x y x z d p p where x s the mea of the measuremets for colum amog those who qualfed for both colums ad, y s the mea of the measuremets amog those who qualfed oly for colum, ad z s the mea of the measuremets amog those who qualfed oly for colum. herefore the varace of the dfferece of the two percetages, codtoal o the totals ad, s gve by 4

( ) ( ) m ( ) p x y z where x s the varace of the measuremets colum of those respodets who qualfed for both colums ad, y s the varace of the measuremets colum of those respodets who oly qualfed for colum, ad z s the varace of the measuremets colum of those respodets who oly qualfed for colum, he estmate of the varace of the dfferece of the two percetages s gve by m mp ( x x) ( ) ( ) y y z z m d [ ( ) ] ( ) ( m ) ( p ) s m p EAMPLE 3: DEPENDEN PAIRED/OVERLAP (LOC+) Suppose we wated to compare the percet that respodets wth a gve attrbute cotrbute to a total of all respodets o that attrbute. For example, suppose colum records the umber of bottles of each of a umber of soft drks cosumed a week by people who ate at McDoald s, colum records the umber of bottles of each of a umber of soft drks cosumed a week by people who ate at Burger Kg, the total row cotas the total cosumpto of soft drks the respectve colums, ad row cotas the cosumpto for Coke each of the two restaurats,. he percetages questo here are the percetage of the total McDoald s soft drk cosumpto that s attrbutable of Coke ad the percetage of the total Burger Kg soft drk cosumpto that s attrbutable of Coke. he possble pared/overlap stuato s that there are respodets who purchased soft drks (ot ecessarly Coke) at both restaurats. Volume of soft drks purchased at McDoald's Burger Kg Al's --------- ----------- ---------- otal 70090 49366 60373 00.0% 00.0% 00.0% Coke 7595 484 638 0.8% 9.8% 0.3% Peps 658 507 5743 9.3% 0.3% 9.5% Seve Up 6874 499 608 9.8% 0.% 0.0% 5

Sprte 7330 54 7088 0.5% 0.6%.7% Fata 609 4846 69 8.7% 9.8%.4% Dr. Pepper 73 489 6409 0.% 9.8% 0.6% Det Peps 769 469 658 0.% 9.5% 0.% Det Coke 7707 4770 559.0% 9.7% 9.% Dr. Brow Cherry 6404 505 567 9.% 0.% 9.3% Dr. Brow CelRay 779 5067 465 0.4% 0.3% 7.7% Let us beg wth the attrbute measures that make up the umerator of the percetage. Let us partto the respodets so that the frst respodets provde data for both colums ad, the ext m respodets provde data oly for colum ad the last p respodets provde data oly for colum. (here may be stll other respodets that provded data o some, f ot all, of the other baer tems, but ot o tems or. hese wll be dsregarded ths aalyss.) Let us deote by x the observed measuremet for colum for respodet ( =,,, ), by x the observed measuremet for colum for respodet ( =,,, ), by y the observed measuremet for respodet ( = +, +,, +m), ad by z the observed measuremet for respodet ( = +m+, +m+,, +m+p). (I assg each of these measuremets dfferet letter ames for clarty of exposto; the data are really a set of +m+p observatos.) he total of the measuremets for that attrbute for those respodg to colum s gve by m x y. ad the total of the measuremets for that attrbute for those respodg to colum s gve by mp m x z Let be the total of the measuremets for those respodg to colum across all attrbutes ad be the total of the measuremets for those respodg to colum across all attrbutes. he the percetages uder cosderato are 6

p, p he dfferece of the two percetages s gve by m m x x ( ) ( ) my ( ) mp x y x z d p p pz where x j s the mea of the measuremets for colum j (j=,) amog those who qualfed for both colums ad, y s the mea of the measuremets amog those who qualfed oly for colum, ad z s the mea of the measuremets amog those who qualfed oly for colum. herefore the varace of the dfferece of the two percetages, codtoal o the totals ad, s gve by ( ) ( ) m ( ) p x x x x y z where s the varace of the measuremets colum of those respodets who qualfed x for both colums ad, s the varace of the measuremets colum of those x respodets who qualfed for both colums ad, r s the correlato betwee the measuremets colum ad colum of those respodets who qualfed for both colums ad, s the varace of the measuremets colum of those respodets who oly y qualfed for colum, ad z s the varace of the measuremets colum of those respodets who oly qualfed for colum. he estmate of the varace of the dfferece of the two percetages s gve by 7

m mp ( x x ) ( x x ) ( x x )( x x ) ( y y) ( z z ) m d [ ] ( ) ( ) ( ) ( m ) ( p ) s m p x x x x y y z z ) m p ( ) m mp { } ( ) ( m ( m) p EAMPLE : WEIGHED DEPENDEN PAIRED/OVERLAP (MULI) Let us deote by x the observed measuremet for both colums ad for respodet ( =,,, ), y the observed measuremet for respodet ( = +, +,, +m), ad by z the observed measuremet for respodet ( = +m+, +m+,, +m+p). (I assg each of these measuremets dfferet letter ames for clarty of exposto; the data are really a set of +m+p observatos.) he weghted total of the measuremets for that attrbute for those respodg to colum s gve by w x w y. m ad the total of the measuremets for that attrbute for those respodg to colum s gve by mp w x w z m Let be the weghted total of the measuremets for those respodg to colum across all attrbutes (e.g., the total Coke cosumpto respodets of all ages who ever ate at the Rtz- Carleto) ad be the weghted total of the measuremets for those respodg to colum across all attrbutes (e.g., the total Coke cosumpto respodets of all ages who ever ate at the Four Seasos). he the percetages uder cosderato are p, p he dfferece of the two percetages s gve by m m mp w x w y w x w z d p p 8

herefore the varace of the dfferece of the two percetages, codtoal o the weghted totals ad, s gve by ( ) ( ) ( ) m mp x w y w z w m where x s the varace of the measuremets colum of those respodets who qualfed for both colums ad, y s the varace of the measuremets colum of those respodets who oly qualfed for colum, ad z s the varace of the measuremets colum of those respodets who oly qualfed for colum, he estmate of the varace of the dfferece of the two percetages s gve by m mp ( x x) ( ) ( ) y y z z m mp m d [ ( ) ] ( ) ( m ) ( p ) m s w w w EAMPLE 3: WEIGHED DEPENDEN PAIRED/OVERLAP (LOC+) Let us deote by x the observed measuremet for colum for respodet ( =,,, ), by x the observed measuremet for colum for respodet ( =,,, ), by y the observed measuremet for respodet ( = +, +,, +m), ad by z the observed measuremet for respodet ( = +m+, +m+,, +m+p). (I assg each of these measuremets dfferet letter ames for clarty of exposto; the data are really a set of +m+p observatos.) he weghted total of the measuremets for that attrbute for those respodg to colum s gve by m w x w y. ad the weghted total of the measuremets for that attrbute for those respodg to colum s gve by mp m w x w z 9

Let be the weghted total of the measuremets for those respodg to colum across all attrbutes ad be the weghted total of the measuremets for those respodg to colum across all attrbutes. he the percetages uder cosderato are p, p he dfferece of the two percetages s gve by m m mp w x w y w x w z d p p herefore the varace of the dfferece of the two percetages, codtoal o the totals ad, s gve by ( ) ( ) ( ) m mp x x x x w y w z w m where s the varace of the measuremets colum of those respodets who qualfed x for both colums ad, s the varace of the measuremets colum of those x respodets who qualfed for both colums ad, r s the correlato betwee the measuremets colum ad colum of those respodets who qualfed for both colums ad, s the varace of the measuremets colum of those respodets who oly y qualfed for colum, ad z s the varace of the measuremets colum of those respodets who oly qualfed for colum. he estmate of the varace of the dfferece of the two percetages s gve by 0

m ( x x ) ( x x) ( x x )( x x) ( ) y y m d [ ] ( ) ( ) ( ) ( m ) s w w mp m ( z z) ( p) mp m x x x x w m mp { } ( ) ( ) y y z z m mp m w w w ( m ) ( p ) m COMPARISON WIH OAL Here the stuato s compouded by the fact that, whe oe calculates a percetage based o a total for a row of a table, that total cotas the total for the colum whch s beg compared to the total colum. here s therefore bult part/whole correlato betwee the two percetages beg compared. EAMPLE : COMPARISON WIH OAL (MULI) UNWEIGHED & WEIGHED Let us deote by x the observed measuremet for colum for respodet ( =,,, ), y the observed measuremet for respodet ( = +, +,, +m). he total of the measuremets for that attrbute for those respodg to colum s gve by x. ad the total of the measuremets for that attrbute for those respodg to the total s gve by m x y Let be the total of the measuremets for those respodg to colum across all attrbutes (e.g., the total Coke cosumpto respodets of all ages who ever ate at the Rtz-Carleto) ad be the weghted total of the measuremets for all respodets across all attrbutes (e.g., the total Coke cosumpto respodets of all ages). he the percetages uder cosderato are p, p

he dfferece of the two percetages s gve by m x x y d p p herefore the varace of the dfferece of the two percetages, codtoal o the totals ad, s gve by ( ) ( ) m x y where x s the varace of the measuremets colum of those respodets who qualfed for colum ad y s the varace of the measuremets colum of those respodets who cotrbuted to the total but dd ot qualfy for colum. he estmate of the varace of the dfferece of the two percetages s gve by If the dffereces are weghted, the m ( x x) ( ) y y d ( ) ( ) ( m) s m m w x x w y dw pw pw w w where w s the weghted total of the measuremets for those respodg to colum across all attrbutes ad w s the weghted total of the measuremets for all respodets across all attrbutes. he the varace of the dfferece of the two weghted percetages, codtoal o the totals w ad w, s gve by ( ) ( ) m x w y w w w w he estmate of the varace of the dfferece of the two weghted percetages s gve by

m ( x x) ( ) y y m d ( ) ( ) w w ( m) w s w w EAMPLE 3: COMPARISON WIH OAL (LOC+) UNWEIGHED & WEIGHED o deal wth the comparso of a colum volumetrc percetage wth a total volumetrc percetage we wll eed a bt of extra otato. Let be the umber of respodets ad c be the umber of colums the table o whch the total s based. Defe as f respodet aswered tem j ad as 0 f respodet dd ot aswer tem j, for =,,, ad j=,,, c. Let us deote by x the observed measuremet for colum j for respodet. (As you ca see, the are used to keep track of the o aswers the data.) he total of the measuremets for that attrbute for those respodg to colum s gve by x. ad the total of the measuremets for that attrbute for all respodets s gve by c j x x Let be the total of the measuremets for those respodg to colum across all attrbutes ad be the total of the measuremets for those across colums across all attrbutes. he the percetages uder cosderato are p, p he dfferece of the two percetages s gve by d p p j c x x j ( ) ( ) x c x herefore the varace of the dfferece of the two percetages, codtoal o the totals ad, s gve by c c ( ) ( ) j ( )( ) j j j j 3

where j s the varace of the measuremets colum j ad, r j s the correlato betwee the measuremets colum ad colum j of those respodets who qualfed for both colums ad j. he estmate of the varace of the dfferece of the two percetages s gve by j c c ( x x ) ( x x ) ( x x )( x x ) ( ) ( ) ( )( ) j j j j j j j where ad j j Whe the data are weghted the w x. w ad the total of the measuremets for that attrbute for all respodets s gve by c w j x w x w Let w be the weghted total of the measuremets for those respodg to colum across all attrbutes ad w be the total of the measuremets for those across colums across all attrbutes. he the percetages uder cosderato are w w p w, pw w he dfferece of the two percetages s gve by w w w w w d p p xw j c x w x w w w w j ( ) ( ) herefore the varace of the dfferece of the two percetages, codtoal o the totals ad, s gve by c c ( ) w ( ) j w ( )( ) j j w c x w w w w w j w w w j 4

he estmate of the varace of the dfferece of the two percetages s gve by j ( x x ) ( x x ) ( x x )( x x ) ( ) ( ) ( )( ) c j c j w w w w w w j j w w w j j 5