Size differences of the post-anoxia, biotic recovery brachiopod, Dyoros sp., in Hughes Creek Shale (Carboniferous), Richardson County, Nebraska.

Similar documents
Cretaceous, Dakota Formation, Terra Cotta Member South Side of I-70, Salina County, Kansas

Phanerozoic Diversity and Mass Extinctions

17-1 The Fossil Record Slide 2 of 40

Field trip to Racine Reef Complex, Thornton Quarry, Illinois

17-1 The Fossil Record Slide 1 of 40

Geologic Time. Geologic Events

GEOLOGICAL AGE OF ROCKS. Absolute geological age

Update on Permian-Triassic Extinction Landscape. David J. Bottjer University of Southern California

Chapter 12. Life of the Paleozoic

Dating the age of the Earth

Clues to the Past. Grades 6-8 Educational Program Guide

Directed Reading. Section: Precambrian Time and the Paleozoic Era EVOLUTION. beginning of life is called. to. PRECAMBRIAN TIME.

THE ORDOVICIAN EXTINCTION. 444 million years ago

Outline. Origin and History of Life

Tanyard Creek Virtual Field Trip

Mass Extinctions &Their Consequences

Tuesday 10 June 2014 Afternoon

GEOLOGY MEDIA SUITE Chapter 8

Mass Extinctions &Their Consequences

The terrestrial rock record

MOR SEAWAY TEACHERS. A CHANGING LANDSCAPE Activity Overview BIG IDEA

Regents Earth Science

G331: The Nature and Adequacy of the Fossil Record

Biology. Slide 1 of 40. End Show. Copyright Pearson Prentice Hall

Depositional Environments. Depositional Environments

Date: TEN UNIT. Earth. History. and

Age Dating and the Oceans

Geologic and Rock Cycles, Fossils and Unconformities

History of life on Earth Mass Extinctions.

Phanerozoic (last 0.54 by) Tectonics Climate Life

PTYS 214 Spring Announcements Midterm #4: two weeks from today!

Rock cycle diagram. Relative dating. Placing rocks and events in proper sequence of formation Deciphering Earth s history from clues in the rocks

Ordovician. System. Cambrian. System

Plan of Development Mountain Valley Pipeline Project. APPENDIX P Plan for Unanticipated Discovery of Paleontological Resources

Name. Ecology & Evolutionary Biology 245 Exam 1 12 February 2008

Fossils and Geology of Litzsinger Road Ecology Center

PERSISTENT PREDATOR-PREY DYNAMICS REVEALED BY MASS EXTINCTION.

GCE A level 1214/01 GEOLOGY GL4 Interpreting the Geological Record

Chapter Study Guide Section 17-1 The Fossil Record (pages )

Section 7. Reading the Geologic History of Your Community. What Do You See? Think About It. Investigate. Learning Outcomes

Adjustments to Life in Air

PLATE TECTONICS THEORY

Illustrations of Selected Ordovician fossils

L.O: HOW GEOLOGISTS SEQUENCE EVENTS IN EARTH'S GEOLOGIC HISTORY IF NOT OVERTURNED, OLDEST ON BOTTOM, YOUNGEST ON TOP

Earth s s Geologic History

Geology Merit Badge Workbook

EARTH S HISTORY. What is Geology? logy: science. Geology is the scientific study of the Earth, including its:

Station Look at the fossil labeled # 16. Identify each of the following: a. Kingdom b. Phylum c. Class d. Genus

Biodiversity Through Earth History

TIME LINE OF LIFE. Strip for Clock of Eras representing the circumference. 1. Review the eras represented on the Clock of Eras:

Proterozoic Life and Environments

Shield was above sea-level during the Cambrian and provided the sediment for the basins.

THIS IS A NEW SPECIFICATION

1. The timeline below represents time on Earth from the beginning of the Paleozoic Era Ato the present B.

3. The diagram below shows how scientists think some of Earth's continents were joined together in the geologic past.

Unit 6: Interpreting Earth s History

GCE AS/A level 1211/01 GEOLOGY GL1 Foundation Unit

Spring th Grade

Geological History of the Grand Canyon

DEEP TIME it's discovery and interpretation

Pee Dee Explorer. Science Standards

The Problem of the Welden, Sycamore and Lower Caney in the Eastern Arbuckle Mountains

Jack Sepkoski s Three Great Evolutionary Faunas: Diversity of marine families through time. Revolutions in the History of Life In the Phanerozoic

Unit 5: Earth s History Practice Problems

FY 2013 Annual Technical Report for NCRDS State Cooperative Program

Warm Up Name the 5 different types of fossils

Cycles in the Phanerozoic

Geologic Time. What have scientists learned about Earth s past by studying rocks and fossils?

Lab 2 Geological Time and Fossil Samples

Rock cycle diagram. Principle of Original Horizontality. Sediment is deposited horizontally

Laboratory 7 Geologic Time

Chapter 15. The Late Paleozoic World

Section 17 1 The Fossil Record (pages )

WHO'S ON FIRST? A RELATIVE DATING ACTIVITY

Core Curriculum Course Proposal Cover Sheet

5 Year B.S/M.S. Program in Geological Sciences and Marine Geosciences

The History of Life. Fossils and Ancient Life (page 417) How Fossils Form (page 418) Interpreting Fossil Evidence (pages ) Chapter 17

Earth History. What is the Earth s time scale? Geological time Scale. Pre-Cambrian. FOUR Eras

EXTINCTION CALCULATING RATES OF ORIGINATION AND EXTINCTION. α = origination rate Ω = extinction rate

1. Identify this organism (it is 1mm in diameter) 2. The shell or of this organism is made of 3. How do these one-celled organism feed? 4.

454/01 GEOLOGY GL4 EXTENSION GEOLOGY. P.M. FRIDAY, 14 June (2 Hours)

Name Class Date. Crossword Puzzle Use the clues below to complete the puzzle.

First, an supershort History of the Earth by Eon

Objectives. Vocabulary. Describe the geologic time scale. Distinguish among the following geologic time scale divisions: eon, era, period, and epoch.

BOY SCOUTS GEOLOGY MERIT BADGE

Geology and Natural Resources

Common Fossils in Pennsylvania

Structural Geology of the Mountains

GEOLOGIC MAPS AND GEOLOGIC STRUCTURES A TEXAS EXAMPLE

How do we learn about ancient life? Fossil- a trace or imprint of a living thing that is preserved by geological processes.

Different Coloration of Devonian Shales

Deep Time: How Old Is Old?

Geologic Time: Hutton s Outcrop at Siccar Point. How do we determine age (relative & absolute) What is the age of the earth? How do we know?

PLEASE DO NOT WRITE ON THIS QUIZ! Relative Dating and Stratigraphic Principles Quiz

Michelle M. Casey, Erin E. Saupe, and Bruce S. Lieberman

Life on Earth Topic Test

Biosphere Biome Ecosystem Community Population Organism

Page 1. Name:

Structural Features and Fracture Orientation similarities between outcrops of the Ridgeley Sandstone

Paleo Lab #4 - Sedimentary Environments

Transcription:

Size differences of the post-anoxia, biotic recovery brachiopod, Dyoros sp., in Hughes Creek Shale (Carboniferous), Richardson County, Nebraska. Daryl Johnson and Rex Hanger Dept. of Geography & Geology University of Wisconsin-Whitewater Whitewater, WI 53190 Abstract. Two localities of the Carboniferous Hughes Creek Shale in southeastern Nebraska contain both fossiliferous limestones and shales, as well as black shales interpreted as being deposited under anoxic conditions in ancient oceans. Fossils within strata above the anoxic layers represent life that had recovered from a local killing event. Examining the killing/recovery patterns on expanded, regional scales is made difficult due to the relative lack of good exposures between outcrops. Previous miscorrelations have occurred for the Hughes Creek Shale in two established collecting localities separated by only a few kilometers. Specimens of the brachiopod fossil, Dyoros sp., abundant at both localities were compared using the size frequency distributions of their length measurements. Null hypotheses of the equality of the medians and equality of the overall distributions were not able to be rejected, adding support to the current accepted interpretation of correlation for the two localities, allowing for future use of both for examining killing/recovery of life on expanded geographic scale. Introduction The Hughes Creek Shale of southeastern Nebraska is a Carboniferous Period (~350-290 million years ago) rock unit that has been interpreted to contain evidence of several intervals of anoxia, or low/no oxygen in the oceans in which they were originally deposited. The anoxic episodes are shown as black-colored shales that are devoid of fossil remains. For the Hughes Creek Shale the anoxic episodes were regional in scale probably covering only several 100km 2. Even so, they are a good, small-scale model for the larger (global?) existence of anoxia during mass extinction events, such as at the end of the Permian Period (~250 million years ago), while the normal limestones and shales deposited above them (and containing fossils) indicate how life and environments recover afterwards.

Before testing any hypotheses of mass extinction and recovery, it is necessary to show that rocks in geographically separated locations can be correlated, or shown to be coeval. Locality 5 of Pabian and Diffendal (2003) is assumed to be correlative to their Locality 10, but they correctly note that it was only a few years before thought to be from a different formation, and several million years younger (Holterhoff and Pabian, 1990). Correlative rock units in this study are assumed to contain fossils with the same size characteristics. In order to test a hypothesis that Localities 5 and 10 are correlative, the size frequency distributions of one of the most distinctive and well-preserved species, the brachiopod Dyoros sp., were statistically compared. Significance for Astrobiology Anoxic events as preserved in the stratigraphic record on Earth are related to space science via the interdisciplinary sciences of Astrobiology and Exobiology. The current guidelines for NASA-supported studies of this type are the Astrobiology Roadmap (Des Marais et al., 2008). This paper addresses GOAL4 Understand how life on Earth and its planetary environment have co-evolved through geological time. Investigate the evolving relationships between Earth and its biota by integrating evidence from the geosciences and biosciences that shows how life evolved, responded to environmental change, and modified environmental conditions on a planetary scale. Objective 4.3 within GOAL 4 is to investigate the effects of extraterrestrial and terrestrial events upon the biosphere, with research based on the fossil record of life and its activities. Evidence of the timeliness of such studies is the fact that a complete session, entitled, Oxygen and Evolution: Looking to the Past was devoted to anoxic black rocks and their associated fossils in the most recent Astrobiology Science Conference 2012 (NASA, 2012). Location Carboniferous age rocks are sporadically exposed in road and stream cuts throughout southeastern Nebraska. Localities 5 and 10 (Figure 1) are both road cut exposures of the Carboniferous rocks in Richardson County, Nebraska, separated by approximately 10 miles of geographic distance. The land cover between the two localities is mostly agricultural, making exact correlations, and even formation identification, difficult.

Figure 1 Locality map of Carboniferous localities in southeastern Nebraska (adapted from Pabian and Diffendal, 2003). Localities 5 and 10 are indicated with arrows. Methods Specimens of Dyoros sp. were collected in the field using both surface collection and bulk sampling methods. These have been shown previously to be an efficient method of maximizing species richness and biomass values. Both localities (5 and 10 of Pabian and Diffendal, 2003) were sampled for equal duration over relatively equal surface areas. In addition, the field collections were supplemented by previously collected specimens from the same sampling localities now deposited in the University of Wisconsin-Whitewater Invertebrate Paleontology collections. All Dyoros sp. specimens (N=103 from Loc. 5; N=257 from Loc. 10) were identified, sorted from the other taxa, counted, and measured for length and width (Figure 2) using digital calipers.

Figure 2 Ventral view of Dyoros sp. from the Hughes Creek Shale. White bar indicates the standardized length measurement for all individuals. For the individual shown, length = 12.73mm. All statistical analyses were performed using the software package, PAST (Hammer et al., 2001). Measurements of the length of unbroken specimens were log-transformed as is standard in biometric analyses (Zelditch et al., 2012) and tested for normality using the Shapiro-Wilk test. The Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to test hypotheses of equality of medians, and the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to test a hypothesis of equality of distributions for the two sampling localities. Results Though both the distributions for Localities 5 and 10 appear normally distributed (Figure 3), Shapiro-Wilk tests for their normal distribution are rejected for Locality 5, p(normal) = 3.009e - 05 ; but not for Locality 10, p(normal) = 0.06558. Since at least one of the distributions is not normal, non-parametric statistical tests were used for further testing.

Figure 3 Size frequency distributions for log-transformed mm length measurements (x-axis) of Dyoros sp. at Locality 5 (right) and Locality 10 (left). Both the Mann-Whitney U and the Kruskal-Wallis are used with non-normal distributions tests for a null hypothesis that two samples are taken from populations with equal medians. Values greater than 0.05 would fail to reject such hypotheses, and thus one could not say that the medians of the two distributions had different medians. Both the Mann-Whitney (p=0.05217) and the Kruskal-Wallis (p=0.0521) fail to reject the null hypothesis. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov can test a null hypothesis of equality of overall distributions for nonnormal data. For a null hypothesis that the two samples are taken from populations with equal distributions, p values greater than 0.05 will fail to reject, and one could say that the two samples had different distributions. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov (p=0.1563) thus fails to reject the null hypothesis. Discussion and Conclusions Body size is an important population characteristic for all marine animals, but especially so for suspension feeding organisms, such as the brachiopod Dyoros sp., because the size of the body has a direct effect on the availability of food particles moving around an obstructive skeleton (Humphries, 2007). In general, larger body sizes can be viewed as a positive factor in feeding, with increased size meaning increased size of flow (and thus, food) vortices shed around a suspension feeding organism. If the ambient environment were different in the original seas existing at Localities 5 and 10, such as would be expected if the two localities were not coeval,

then the expectation would be that this should be reflected in different body size distributions between localities for populations of the same species, like Dyoros sp. At the community level, body size distribution has proven useful in describing variation both within and between modern (Robson et al., 2005) and ancient (Payne, 2005) communities. The relative body size distributions of any member species may control the species composition and relative abundances, influencing community function. Again, if Localities 5 and 10 were not coeval, then the expected, different body size distributions of suspension feeding species like Dyoros sp. would produce cascading effects throughout numerous species of the communities, which are simply not observed for Localities 5 and 10. The failure to reject null hypotheses of the equality of medians (Mann-Whitney and Kruskal- Wallis tests) and equality of distributions (Kolomogorov-Smirnov test) supports the correlation of Localities 5 and 10 of the Hughes Creek Shale. This then fails to reject an informal hypothesis that the two localities preserve coeval beds of strata. The rejection of the earlier interpretation of Holterhoff and Pabian (1990) by Pabian and Diffendal (2003) is supported by the evidence presented here. Confident that Localities 5 and 10 are indeed coeval, they can both be used in aggregate to examine the recovery of marine fauna after recovery after a small-scale anoxic event covering at minimum, the ~10 mile distance between them. Both localities are highly fossiliferous, and their summed diversities and body size distributions for all taxa, including Dyoros sp., as shown here, add to their robustness as an astrobiologic model for the extinction and recovery of taxa during larger-scale extinctions. Bibliography Des Marais, D., J. A. Nuth, III, L. Allamandola, A. P. Boss, J. D. Farmer, T. M. Hoehler, B. M. Jakosky, V. S. Meadows, A. Pohorille, B. Runnegar and A. M. Sporman. 2008. The NASA Astrobiology Roadmap. Astrobiology, 8(4): 715-730. Hammer, O., Harper, D. A. T. and Ryan, P. D. 2001. PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologica Electronica, 4(1): 1-9. Holterhoff, P. and R. K. Pabian. 1990. Paleoenvironmental implications of a pyritized molluscan fauna from the Bennett Shale Member, Red Eagle Formation (Lower Permian), Richardson County, Nebraska. The Compass, 67(1): 35-46. Humphries, S. 2007. Body size and suspension feeding, Pp. 16-32, In Hildrew, A., D. G. Raffaelli and R. Edmonds-Brown (eds.), Body Size: The Structure and Function of Aquatic Ecosystems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.

NASA. 2012. http://abscicon2012.arc.nasa.gov/abstracts/ Pabian, R. K. and R. F. Diffendal, Jr. 2003. Late Pennsylvanian and earliest Permian cyclic sedimentation and paleoecology in southeastern Nebraska. In Niemi, T. (ed.) Geologic Field Trips in the Greater Kansas City area. Missouri Geological Survey, Special Publication, pp. 35-52. Payne, J. L. 2005. Evolutionary dynamics of gastropod size across the end-permian extinction and through the Triassic recovery interval. Paleobiology, 31(2): 269-290. Robson, B. J., L. A. Barmuta and P. G. Fairweather. 2005. Methodological and conceptual issues in the search for a relationship between animal body-size distributions and benthic habitat architecture. Marine and Freshwater Research, 56: 1-11. Zelditch, M., D. Swiderski and H. D. Sheets. 2012. Geometric Morphometrics for Biologists; A Primer. Second Edition. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 478pp.