Calendarization & Normalization. Steve Heinz, PE, CEM, CMVP Founder & CEO EnergyCAP, Inc.

Similar documents
A FACILITY MANAGER S INTRODUCTION TO WEATHER CORRECTION FOR UTILITY BILL TRACKING. John Avina, Director Abraxas Energy Consulting

S95 INCOME-TESTED ASSISTANCE RECONCILIATION WORKSHEET (V3.1MF)

Demand Forecasting. for. Microsoft Dynamics 365 for Operations. User Guide. Release 7.1. April 2018

Advanced Forecast. For MAX TM. Users Manual

Taking the garbage out of energy modeling through calibration

FEB DASHBOARD FEB JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC

LOADS, CUSTOMERS AND REVENUE

Process Behavior Analysis Understanding Variation

Determine the trend for time series data

The SAB Medium Term Sales Forecasting System : From Data to Planning Information. Kenneth Carden SAB : Beer Division Planning

NSP Electric - Minnesota Annual Report Peak Demand and Annual Electric Consumption Forecast

Monthly Sales Weather Normalization and Estimating Unbilled Sales. Al Bass Kansas City Power & Light EFG Meeting Las Vegas, NV April 2-3, 2014

Multivariate Regression Model Results

Defining Normal Weather for Energy and Peak Normalization

Lesson Adaptation Activity: Analyzing and Interpreting Data

SMART GRID FORECASTING

Thursday 4 June 2015 Afternoon

The Dayton Power and Light Company Load Profiling Methodology Revised 7/1/2017

Computing & Telecommunications Services Monthly Report January CaTS Help Desk. Wright State University (937)

What Is the Relationship Between Earth s Tilt and the Seasons?

Computing & Telecommunications Services

Creating PET Adjustment Coefficients

Sales Analysis User Manual

Lower Tuolumne River Accretion (La Grange to Modesto) Estimated daily flows ( ) for the Operations Model Don Pedro Project Relicensing

Time Series and Forecasting

Forecasting Workbench in PRMS TM. Master Production Schedule. Material Requirements Plan. Work Order/ FPO Maintenance. Soft Bill Maintenance

WEATHER NORMALIZATION METHODS AND ISSUES. Stuart McMenamin Mark Quan David Simons

MISSION DEBRIEFING: Teacher Guide

Quick Reference Manual. Ver. 1.3

From Sales to Peak, Getting It Right Long-Term Demand Forecasting

Using the Budget Features in Quicken 2008

Activity Sheet Counting M&Ms

PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF GREGORY TEPLOW SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY AND SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY

Development and performance evaluation of a methodology, based on distributed computing, for speeding EnergyPlus simulation

Interstate Power & Light (IPL) 2013/2014

Time series and Forecasting

Appendix D. Model Setup, Calibration, and Validation

Improve Forecasts: Use Defect Signals

A Report on a Statistical Model to Forecast Seasonal Inflows to Cowichan Lake

Chapter 3. Regression-Based Models for Developing Commercial Demand Characteristics Investigation

SAT RELEASED TEST ADMINISTERED ON APRIL 10, 2018 CLASSROOM SAT SESSION #6

Exercise 6. Solar Panel Orientation EXERCISE OBJECTIVE DISCUSSION OUTLINE. Introduction to the importance of solar panel orientation DISCUSSION

EVALUATION OF ALGORITHM PERFORMANCE 2012/13 GAS YEAR SCALING FACTOR AND WEATHER CORRECTION FACTOR

Third Grade Math and Science DBQ Weather and Climate/Representing and Interpreting Charts and Data - Teacher s Guide

Accountability. User Guide

Forecasting (LO-PR) HELP.LOPR. Release 4.6C

ACRL 2014 Program Planning

Changing Hydrology under a Changing Climate for a Coastal Plain Watershed

LTM - LandScape Terrain Modeller

2006 IRP Technical Workshop Load Forecasting Tuesday, January 24, :00 am 3:30 pm (Pacific) Meeting Summary

RD1 - Page 469 of 578

Mountain View Community Shuttle Monthly Operations Report

Investigating Factors that Influence Climate

Multiple Regression Analysis

Lecture 10 Multistep Analysis

Communicating Climate Change Consequences for Land Use

Estimating Sewage System Flows

7CORE SAMPLE. Time series. Birth rates in Australia by year,

Gorge Area Demand Forecast. Prepared for: Green Mountain Power Corporation 163 Acorn Lane Colchester, Vermont Prepared by:

A. Identification of Temperature as the Cause of Non-Attainment

SAN DIEGO GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY 2013 TRIENNIAL COST ALLOCATION PROCEEDING (A ) (DATA REQUEST DRA-MPS-2)

THE STATE OF SURFACE WATER GAUGING IN THE NAVAJO NATION

APPEND AND MERGE. Colorado average snowfall amounts - Aggregated by County and Month

Worksheet: The Climate in Numbers and Graphs

Abram Gross Yafeng Peng Jedidiah Shirey

COMPARISON OF PEAK FORECASTING METHODS. Stuart McMenamin David Simons

2001 ANNUAL REPORT on INTERBASIN TRANSFERS for RTP South and the Towns of Cary, Apex, and Morrisville

Decision 411: Class 3

Demand Forecasting Models

Wind Resource Data Summary Cotal Area, Guam Data Summary and Transmittal for December 2011

Lesson 4 Linear Functions and Applications

Yellow Sea Thermohaline and Acoustic Variability

Objectives. Materials

Seasonal Adjustment using X-13ARIMA-SEATS

Rainfall Lab. Forest Water Resources Spring 20XX

Introduction to Forecasting

Decision 411: Class 3

Computational and Monte-Carlo Aspects of Systems for Monitoring Reliability Data. Emmanuel Yashchin IBM Research, Yorktown Heights, NY

R.L. Kellogg, Ph.D. North American Sundial Society June 2013

spatial water demand (population density) spatial junctions distribution (building density) digital elevation map

Exponential and Logarithmic Functions. Copyright Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

2008 Growing Season. Niagara Region

Decision 411: Class 3

2013 GROWTH INCENTIVES PROGRAM FAQS

Forecasting using R. Rob J Hyndman. 1.3 Seasonality and trends. Forecasting using R 1

Case Study Las Vegas, Nevada By: Susan Farkas Chika Nakazawa Simona Tamutyte Zhi-ya Wu AAE/AAL 330 Design with Climate

Appendix B Microsoft Office Specialist exam objectives maps

Sampling Distributions of the Sample Mean Pocket Pennies

Comparison of Particulate Monitoring Methods at Fort Air Partnership Monitoring Stations

A MACRO-DRIVEN FORECASTING SYSTEM FOR EVALUATING FORECAST MODEL PERFORMANCE

Tracking Accuracy: An Essential Step to Improve Your Forecasting Process

6 Securing of the delivery and acceptance

Disentangling Impacts of Climate & Land Use Changes on the Quantity & Quality of River Flows in Southern Ontario

Using a graphic display calculator

ON SITE SYSTEMS Chemical Safety Assistant

Astronomy A BEGINNER S GUIDE TO THE UNIVERSE EIGHTH EDITION

Chapter 0 2/19/2014. Lecture Outline. 0.1 The Obvious View. Charting the Heavens. 0.1 The Obvious View. 0.1 The Obvious View. Units of Chapter 0

Variables For Each Time Horizon

Use of Normals in Load Forecasting at National Grid

Year 10 Mathematics Semester 2 Bivariate Data Chapter 13

Transcription:

Calendarization & Normalization Steve Heinz, PE, CEM, CMVP Founder & CEO EnergyCAP, Inc.

Calendarization

EnergyCAP Reporting Month Each utility bill is assigned to a reporting month when entered, called the Billing Period. Example: A bill for April 20 May 20 is assigned to Billing Period of May because a majority of the days are in May even though 1/3 rd of the consumption was in April. Note: This default BP assignment is editable in manual bill entry and in bill import files.

EnergyCAP Reporting Month A 60-day water bill for April 20 June 20 will be called a May bill (May being the reporting month); April and June will report zero consumption. For some purposes, smoothing out bills to the calendar month in which the consumption occurred is preferred.

This process is called Calendarization

Why Calendarize? Better month-to-month and year-to-year comparisons Smooth out multi-month bills More representative of actual monthly energy usage even though utility bill meter readings do not align with calendar month dates

Why Calendarize? (cont d) Better reports and graphs Improved Budget Worksheet Fewer false alarms and wasted investigation time Available only in EnergyCAP Online versions

Calendarization Process

Non-weather sensitive meters Simple average daily use and cost allocation Spread it out based on days in each calendar month

Non-weather sensitive meters The actual bill is Dec 23 to Dec 25 (note: last day is ignored) Each day has the same allocated usage

Weather sensitive meters Split bill into weather sensitive and non-weather sensitive pieces Simple per day allocation of non-weather sensitive piece Degree day proration of weather sensitive piece

Weather sensitive meters The actual bill is Jul 23 to Aug 23 (note: last day is ignored) The non-weather sensitive portion is the same The weather sensitive portion is dependent upon the weather (the degree days) on each day

Most important concept: On an annual basis, the use and cost totals of calendarized data are equal to actual utility bills (exception: possible year-end rollover)

Calendarization is a better way to report and display the data unless you need to: Discuss actual bills with the vendor Reconcile actual bills with accounting functions Use actual bills to charge tenants, departments or reimbursable activities for their portion of utility usage

Non-Calendarized Quarterly Water Bills

Calendarized Quarterly Water Bills

How do we determine weather sensitivity? Similar to Cost Avoidance (M&V) Statistical correlation of usage vs. degree days Summer and winter analyzed separately Results visible for each meter Even a weather-sensitive meter is seldom 100% weather sensitive. A portion is non-weather base load and a portion is weather sensitive HVAC load

Weather sensitivity

Normalization

Why Normalize? Better year-to-year comparisons of usage (only) Shows energy usage reduction attributable to your efforts, not due to year-to-year weather variations Very valuable in long-term EUI charts to see real energy use reductions over time Available only in EnergyCAP Online versions

Normalization Process

Most important concept: Normalization shows estimated (hypothetical) data How much would I have used if the weather had been equal in every year to 2012?

Non-weather sensitive meters Simple average daily use and cost allocation No adjustments are made Spread it out based on days in each calendar month For non-weather sensitive meters, normalized data=calendarized data

Weather sensitive meters Split the bill into weather sensitive and non-weather sensitive pieces Simple per day allocation of the non-weather sensitive piece Degree day adjustment of the weather sensitive piece, using the degree days of the user-defined normalization base year (Administration>Normalization) Note: Use Weather Data Depot to find a typical degree day year as the base year, don t use an extreme year.

WeatherDataDepot.com helps find an average year

Simpler Normalization Process Possible? Q: Wouldn t this be a lot simpler if I just divided my total usage by total degree days, to give me a simple usage per degree day index? A: Yes, it would be simpler. It would also be totally invalid, so don t waste your time doing it.

Simpler Normalization Process Possible? (cont d) The divide all usage by degree days assumes that 100% of usage is weather sensitive But, you don t want to make weather adjustments where weather has no impact on a meter s usage (this causes over-adjusting) and almost no meters are 100% sensitive

Normalization Result #1 Monthly Use Graphic

Normalization Result #2 Annual Use Graphic

Normalization Result #3 Energy Use Graphic

Project Tracking Track Sustainability Projects

Project Appears on Chart Energy Use Intensity

Limitations of Normalization Weather regressions are not tunable by meter (as they are in Cost Avoidance) so you can t adjust Balance Point by meter or delete outliers. This results in a considerable number of failed regressions which default to no weather normalization for that meter

Limitations of Normalization No adjustments are made, or can be made, for any other significant variables over time (occupancy, new loads, etc. although EUI charts account for floor area).

Many Calendarized and Normalized Reports