Using Gravity to Measure the Mass of a Star

Similar documents
Accurate Mass Determination of the Old White Dwarf G through Astrometric Microlensing

Planet Detection! Estimating f p!

Stellar distances and velocities. ASTR320 Wednesday January 24, 2018

Can We See Them?! Planet Detection! Planet is Much Fainter than Star!

Characterizing Stars

Searching for Other Worlds

Position 1 Position 2 6 after position 1 Distance between positions 1 and 2 is the Bigger = bigger parallax (Ɵ)

Lecture 16 The Measuring the Stars 3/26/2018

Basic Properties of the Stars

Parallax: Measuring the distance to Stars

Lecture Outlines. Chapter 17. Astronomy Today 8th Edition Chaisson/McMillan Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 15: Surveying the Stars

5. A particular star has an angle of parallax of 0.2 arcsecond. What is the distance to this star? A) 50 pc B) 2 pc C) 5 pc D) 0.

Review Chapter 10. 2) A parsec is slightly more than 200,000 AU. 2)

The Cosmic Perspective. Surveying the Properties of Stars. Surveying the Stars. How do we measure stellar luminosities?

15.1 Properties of Stars

Guiding Questions. Measuring Stars

Stars: basic observations

Chapter 8: The Family of Stars

Lecture 12: Distances to stars. Astronomy 111

Chapter 15 Surveying the Stars Properties of Stars

Chapter 15 Surveying the Stars

Chapter 10 Measuring the Stars

Chapter 15 Surveying the Stars Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 11 Surveying the Stars

Transiting Hot Jupiters near the Galactic Center

Planet Detection. Estimating f p

Distances to Stars. Important as determines actual brightness but hard to measure as stars are so far away

Observed Properties of Stars ASTR 2120 Sarazin

MULTIPLE CHOICE. Choose the one alternative that best completes the statement or answers the question.

Test #2 results. Grades posted in UNM Learn. Along with current grade in the class

ASTR-1020: Astronomy II Course Lecture Notes Section III

Pr P ope p rti t es s of o f St S a t rs

Properties of Stars. For such huge objects, stars have comparatively simple properties when seen from a long way off

Astronomy 122 Outline

Characterizing Stars

Characterizing Stars. Guiding Questions. Parallax. Careful measurements of the parallaxes of stars reveal their distances

Chapter 8: The Family of Stars

Mass-Luminosity and Stellar Lifetimes WS

ASTR 200 : Lecture 26. Gravitational Lensing

Universe. Tenth Edition. The Nature of the Stars. Parallax. CHAPTER 17 The Nature of Stars

Ch. 10: Star Formation of Planetary Systems. A summary of the process by which our solar system formed, according to the nebular theory.

Key Ideas: The Search for New Planets. Scientific Questions. Are we alone in the Universe? Direct Imaging. Searches for Extrasolar Planets

Stellar Masses: Binary Stars

Stars, Galaxies, and the Universe

Chapter 15 Surveying the Stars. Agenda

Astronomical Measurements: Brightness-Luminosity-Distance-Radius- Temperature-Mass. Dr. Ugur GUVEN

Measuring the Properties of Stars (ch. 17) [Material in smaller font on this page will not be present on the exam]

Revisiting the gravitational lensing with Gauss Bonnet theorem

29:50 Stars, Galaxies, and the Universe Second Hour Exam November 10, 2010 Form A

The Hertzsprung-Russell Diagram and Stellar Evolution

The Stars. Background & History The Celestial Sphere: Fixed Stars and the Luminaries

Astro Fall 2012 Lecture 8. T. Howard

AST 2010: Descriptive Astronomy EXAM 2 March 3, 2014

Observations of extrasolar planets

Exploring Dark Matter through Gravitational Lensing. Exploring the Dark Universe Indiana University June 2007

Chapter 15 Surveying the Stars. Properties of Stars. Parallax and Distance. Distances Luminosities Temperatures Radii Masses

The Family of Stars. Chapter 13. Triangulation. Trigonometric Parallax. Calculating Distance Using Parallax. Calculating Distance Using Parallax

INSIDE LAB 8: Plotting Stars on the Hertzsprung- Russell Diagram

Extrasolar Planets. Methods of detection Characterization Theoretical ideas Future prospects

Extrasolar Planets. Today. Dwarf Planets. Extrasolar Planets. Next week. Review Tuesday. Exam Thursday. also, Homework 6 Due

1 of 6 5/2/2015 6:12 PM

Exam #2 Review Sheet. Part #1 Clicker Questions

A star is at a distance of 1.3 parsecs, what is its parallax?

Relativity and Astrophysics Lecture 15 Terry Herter. RR Lyrae Variables Cepheids Variables Period-Luminosity Relation. A Stellar Properties 2

HOMEWORK - Chapter 17 The Stars

The cosmic distance scale

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Physics Department Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences Department. Problem Set 6

Habitability Outside the Solar System. A discussion of Bennett & Shostak Chapter 11 HNRS 228 Dr. H. Geller

Structure and Evolution of Stars Lecture 19: White Dwarfs

Astronomy 150: Killer Skies. Lecture 20, March 7

Chapter 13 Other Planetary Systems. Why is it so difficult to detect planets around other stars? Brightness Difference

Astronomy 141 Life in the Universe Professor Gaudi Homework #4 Solutions

Light and Stars ASTR 2110 Sarazin

Answer Key Testname: MT S

DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICS AND ASTRONOMY. Planets around white dwarfs Matt Burleigh

Astronomy 113. Dr. Joseph E. Pesce, Ph.D. Dr. Joseph E. Pesce, Ph.D.

1. Basic Properties of Stars

Get ready for quiz # 5! Get out a ½ sheet and Calculator

Fundamental (Sub)stellar Parameters: Masses and Radii. PHY 688, Lecture 10

Lecture 14: The Sun and energy transport in stars. Astronomy 111

Lecture 26 The Hertzsprung- Russell Diagram January 13b, 2014

Exam # 3 Tue 12/06/2011 Astronomy 100/190Y Exploring the Universe Fall 11 Instructor: Daniela Calzetti

Astronomy Stars, Galaxies and Cosmology Exam 3. Please PRINT full name

Reading and Announcements. Read Chapters 8.3, 11.5, 12.1 Quiz #5, Thursday, March 21 Homework #5 due Tuesday, March 19

ASTRONOMY II Spring 1995 FINAL EXAM. Monday May 8th 2:00pm

The Cosmic Distance Ladder

Announcements. Lecture 11 Properties of Stars. App Bright = L / 4!d 2

Intro to Astrophysics

ASTR-101 4/4/2018 Stellar Evolution: Part II Lecture 19

Reading and Announcements. Read Chapters 9.5, 9.6, and 11.4 Quiz #4, Thursday, March 7 Homework #5 due Tuesday, March 19

Dark Matter and Dark Energy

OPTION E, ASTROPHYSICS TEST REVIEW

Astronomy 100 Spring 2006 Lecture Questions Twelve Weeks Review

ASTRONOMY QUIZ NUMBER 11

1. Convective throughout deliver heat from core to surface purely by convection.

Science Olympiad Astronomy C Division Event Golden Gate Invitational February 11, 2017

Agenda for Ast 309N, Sep. 27. Measuring Masses from Binary Stars

Betelgeuse and Rigel are two super giants in the constellation of Orion. Constellation: Stellar cluster:...

Prentice Hall EARTH SCIENCE

Transcription:

STScI Newsletter Vol. 34 Issue 02 Using Gravity to Measure the Mass of a Star Abstract Kailash C. Sahu, ksahu[at]stsci.edu In a reprise of the famous 1919 solar eclipse experiment that confirmed Einstein's general relativity, the nearby white dwarf, Stein 2051 B, passed very close to a background star in March 2014. As Stein 2051 B passed by, the background star's position was relativistically deflected. The superb angular resolution of Hubble allowed us to measure this deflection the first such measurement of the deflection caused by a star beyond the solar system and thereby determine the mass of Stein 2051 B. This mass measurement confirms the physics of degenerate matter, and provides a new tool to determine the masses of isolated stars. Measuring mass through relativistic deflection One of the key predictions of general relativity set forth hundred years ago by Einstein was that the curvature of space near a massive body causes a ray of light passing near it to be deflected by twice the amount that would be expected based on classical Newtonian gravity (Fig. 1). The first observation of this phenomenon came during the total solar eclipse of 1919, providing one of the first convincing proofs of general relativity. Yet, despite 100 years of technological advances, this phenomenon had not been observed beyond the solar system not surprisingly, because the deflections are so tiny. Even for the nearest stars, the angular deflection is two to three orders of magnitude smaller than the deflection of 1.75 arcsec measured during the 1919 solar eclipse. The relativistic deflection depends on the mass of the deflecting object (lens), the angular separation between the lens and the source, and the parallactic distance of the lens with respect to the source. Since the angular separation and the paralactic distance can be measured accurately, the relativistic deflection provides a direct measure of the lens mass. Unlike classical methods involving binaries, this method can be applied to mass measurements for single stars. Predicting close encounters of the stellar kind Close passages of stars in front of background stars, however, are very rare. So we carried out a large-scale search for such events in which nearby stars with large proper motions (PMs) would pass closely in front of background sources. One of the most interesting predicted events was a close passage of the nearby white dwarf (WD) star Stein 2051 B in front of an 18 th magnitude background star. We estimated that the closest encounter would occur during March 2014, with an impact parameter of 0.1 arcsec. Actual measurement of such a deflection, especially so close to the glare of the bright foreground star, is challenging but within the capabilities of the instruments on the Hubble Space Telescope.

Figure 1: A shematic representation of the relativistic bending of light. The curvature of space near the white dwarf bends the light rays from the distant star, causing an apparent shift in the position of the distant source. The cool and nearby white dwarf Stein 2051B Stein 2051 is a nearby visual binary whose fainter (V = 12.4) but more-massive component, Stein 2051 B, is the sixth nearest white dwarf at a distance of 5.2 pc. The brighter, 11th-magnitude companion, Stein 2051 A, is a low-mass, main-sequence star of spectral type M4. The angular separation between the two components is currently ~10.1arcsec. The actual mass of Stein 2051 B has been a matter of debate. Photographic observations extending back to 1908 have been used to measure orbital motion, from which the mass of B was estimated to be 0.50 M ʘ. To explain its observed radius, such a low mass would require the WD to have an iron core, which would be in conflict with normal theory of stellar evolution. Moreover, a WD cooling age of ~2.0 Gyr derived for Stein 2051 B, combined with the implied long main-sequence lifetime of the progenitor of a low-mass WD, would give the system a total age uncomfortably close to the age of the Universe. Measuring Deflections with Hubble We imaged the field of Stein 2051 with the Wide Field Camera 3 at eight epochs between October 2013 and October 2015 as shown in Figure 2 (Sahu et al. 2017). The figure shows a color image of the region around Stein 2051 B, created by superposing F606W and F814W frames at the first epoch. The path of the WD past the source, due to PM and parallax, is depicted by the wavy line. Closest approach to the source star occurred on 5 March 2014, at an angular separation of 103 milliarcsec. We used the observations at all eight epochs to determine the parallax and PM of the WD, and observations at 4 epochs for the deflection analysis.

Figure 2: Hubble Space Telescope image showing the close passage of the nearby white dwarf Stein 2051 B in front of a distant source star. The path of Stein 2051 B across the field due to its proper motion towards south-east combined with its parallax due to the motion the Earth around the Sun, is shown by the wavy cyan line. The source is also labelled. Figure 3 plots the measured source positions at the four epochs we analyzed, showing the relativistic deflections, to which we performed a model fit. The resulting fitting parameters indicate an Einstein ring radius of θ E = 31.53 ± 1.20 mas, corresponding to a mass of 0.675 ± 0.051 M ʘ. Mass of Stein 2051 B and the MRR Most stars end their lives as WDs as will the Sun and then slowly cool. Composed of degenerate matter, WDs are expected to obey a mass-radius relation (MRR) such that, as the mass of the WD increases from ~0.5 M ʘ to the Chandrasekhar limit of ~1.4 M ʘ, its radius decreases approximately as the inverse cube root of its mass. However, observational confirmation of MRR is rare since the vast majority of WD masses cannot be measured directly, but have to be inferred using theoretical models.

Figure 3: Our measured and the model positions of the background source as a function of Time. Solid diamonds show the undeflected positions. The measured deflected positions are plotted as filled black circles, their mean at each epoch is shown as a diamond. The model fit (solid purple curve) has an Einstein ring radius of 31.53 milliarcsec. Our direct measurement of the mass of Stein 2051 B provides a direct confirmation of the theoretical MRRs. The location of Stein 2051 B in the MRR is plotted in Figure 4, which shows an excellent agreement with the theory. For comparison, the MRR for zero-temperature WDs with iron cores is also shown, which is excluded by our measurement, thus putting the 100-year old debate to rest. Future Prospects The single most important physical parameter of a star is its mass. The mass of a star dictates its temperature, radius, luminosity, lifetime, and ultimate fate. Yet, we do not have a modelindependent method to measure the mass of a single star. The method described here provides a direct, model-independent method, in those favorable cases of a nearby star fortuitously passing close in front of a background source. Unlike classical methods involving binaries, this method can be applied to mass measurements for single stars. We have another ongoing Hubble program to measure the mass of the nearest star, Proxima Centauri, using this method. Finally, there are several future missions, such as Gaia, LSST and Webb, which will have sufficient astrometric accuracy to perhaps provide direct measurements of many single stars through this method.

Figure 4: Mass-radius relation for Stein 2051 B and only three other nearby white dwarfs in visual binaries for which the masses have been independently determined. The black curve is a theoretical mass-radius relation for carbon-oxygen core white dwarfs with the parameters of Stein 2051B. The mass of Stein 2051 B inferred from the astrometric microlensing, 0.675 ± 0.051 M ʘ, falls right on the theoretical MRR, thus providing a confirmation of the theory of white dwarfs. References Sahu, K. C., et al. 2017, Science, 356, 1046