Minkowski Inverse for the Range Symmetric Block Matrix with Two Identical Sub-blocks Over Skew Fields in Minkowski Space M

Similar documents
Group inverse for the block matrix with two identical subblocks over skew fields

Generalized Principal Pivot Transform

Some Expressions for the Group Inverse of the Block Partitioned Matrices with an Invertible Subblock

Multiplicative Perturbation Bounds of the Group Inverse and Oblique Projection

A Note on the Group Inverses of Block Matrices Over Rings

The Expression for the Group Inverse of the Anti triangular Block Matrix

Some results on the reverse order law in rings with involution

Moore Penrose inverses and commuting elements of C -algebras

On Sums of Conjugate Secondary Range k-hermitian Matrices

MATH 2331 Linear Algebra. Section 2.1 Matrix Operations. Definition: A : m n, B : n p. Example: Compute AB, if possible.

Applied Matrix Algebra Lecture Notes Section 2.2. Gerald Höhn Department of Mathematics, Kansas State University

ELA ON THE GROUP INVERSE OF LINEAR COMBINATIONS OF TWO GROUP INVERTIBLE MATRICES

Chapter 1. Matrix Algebra

EXPLICIT SOLUTION OF THE OPERATOR EQUATION A X + X A = B

arxiv: v1 [math.ra] 27 Jul 2013

arxiv: v1 [math.ra] 14 Apr 2018

Fall Inverse of a matrix. Institute: UC San Diego. Authors: Alexander Knop

Formulas for the Drazin Inverse of Matrices over Skew Fields

The DMP Inverse for Rectangular Matrices

arxiv: v1 [math.ra] 24 Aug 2016

MOORE-PENROSE INVERSE IN AN INDEFINITE INNER PRODUCT SPACE

A revisit to a reverse-order law for generalized inverses of a matrix product and its variations

Linear Algebra and its Applications

Operators with Compatible Ranges

arxiv: v1 [math.ra] 28 Jan 2016

Section 3.3. Matrix Rank and the Inverse of a Full Rank Matrix

Moore-Penrose-invertible normal and Hermitian elements in rings

Product of Range Symmetric Block Matrices in Minkowski Space

Formulae for the generalized Drazin inverse of a block matrix in terms of Banachiewicz Schur forms

arxiv: v1 [math.ra] 15 Jul 2013

Group Inverse for a Class 2 2 Circulant Block Matrices over Skew Fields

On Pseudo SCHUR Complements in an EP Matrix

Re-nnd solutions of the matrix equation AXB = C

a Λ q 1. Introduction

Lecture 2: Linear operators

On EP elements, normal elements and partial isometries in rings with involution

EP elements in rings

Range Symmetric Matrices in Indefinite Inner Product Space

Math 370 Spring 2016 Sample Midterm with Solutions

Factorization of weighted EP elements in C -algebras

The Drazin inverses of products and differences of orthogonal projections

On the Moore-Penrose and the Drazin inverse of two projections on Hilbert space

Perturbation of the generalized Drazin inverse

Some results about the index of matrix and Drazin inverse

Optimization problems on the rank and inertia of the Hermitian matrix expression A BX (BX) with applications

Solutions to Exam I MATH 304, section 6

MATH 423 Linear Algebra II Lecture 10: Inverse matrix. Change of coordinates.

On some matrices related to a tree with attached graphs

~ g-inverses are indeed an integral part of linear algebra and should be treated as such even at an elementary level.

Elementary operation matrices: row addition

REPRESENTATIONS FOR THE GENERALIZED DRAZIN INVERSE IN A BANACH ALGEBRA (COMMUNICATED BY FUAD KITTANEH)

(AA-A = A) and A + be the Moore-Penrose inverse of A [4]. A matrix A is called EP r

arxiv: v1 [math.ra] 16 Nov 2016

Some additive results on Drazin inverse

Math 54 HW 4 solutions

Dragan S. Djordjević. 1. Introduction and preliminaries

COSE212: Programming Languages. Lecture 1 Inductive Definitions (1)

Representations and sign pattern of the group inverse for some block matrices

Drazin Invertibility of Product and Difference of Idempotents in a Ring

A Note on Solutions of the Matrix Equation AXB = C

The Hermitian R-symmetric Solutions of the Matrix Equation AXA = B

Some results on matrix partial orderings and reverse order law

Lectures on Linear Algebra for IT

Definition 2.3. We define addition and multiplication of matrices as follows.

The reflexive and anti-reflexive solutions of the matrix equation A H XB =C

EP elements and Strongly Regular Rings

Some Properties of Conjugate Unitary Matrices

Subrings and Ideals 2.1 INTRODUCTION 2.2 SUBRING

Math 54 First Midterm Exam, Prof. Srivastava September 23, 2016, 4:10pm 5:00pm, 155 Dwinelle Hall.

Abstract. In this article, several matrix norm inequalities are proved by making use of the Hiroshima 2003 result on majorization relations.

linearly indepedent eigenvectors as the multiplicity of the root, but in general there may be no more than one. For further discussion, assume matrice

Generalized core inverses of matrices

A GENERALIZATION OF BI IDEALS IN SEMIRINGS

PRIME RADICAL IN TERNARY HEMIRINGS. R.D. Giri 1, B.R. Chide 2. Shri Ramdeobaba College of Engineering and Management Nagpur, , INDIA

Math 3191 Applied Linear Algebra

A CHARACTERIZATION OF THE OPERATOR-VALUED TRIANGLE EQUALITY

3.4 Elementary Matrices and Matrix Inverse

Diagonal and Monomial Solutions of the Matrix Equation AXB = C

Principal pivot transforms of range symmetric matrices in indefinite inner product space

HYPO-EP OPERATORS 1. (Received 21 May 2013; after final revision 29 November 2014; accepted 7 October 2015)

Preliminary Linear Algebra 1. Copyright c 2012 Dan Nettleton (Iowa State University) Statistics / 100

Review : Powers of a matrix

MATH 5524 MATRIX THEORY Problem Set 4

International Journal of Algebra, Vol. 4, 2010, no. 2, S. Uma

The Moore-Penrose inverse of 2 2 matrices over a certain -regular ring

ELA

On pairs of generalized and hypergeneralized projections on a Hilbert space

On Interval Valued Fuzzy Det-Norm Matrix with Partitions

Linear Algebra. Session 8

Math 4377/6308 Advanced Linear Algebra

ADDITIVE RESULTS FOR THE GENERALIZED DRAZIN INVERSE

Algebra C Numerical Linear Algebra Sample Exam Problems

Section 12.4 Algebra of Matrices

Additive results for the generalized Drazin inverse in a Banach algebra

1 Matrices and vector spaces

1 Last time: least-squares problems

A note on solutions of linear systems

DM559 Linear and Integer Programming. Lecture 6 Rank and Range. Marco Chiarandini

THE EXPLICIT EXPRESSION OF THE DRAZIN INVERSE OF SUMS OF TWO MATRICES AND ITS APPLICATION

Matrix operations Linear Algebra with Computer Science Application

Transcription:

International Journal of Mathematics And its Applications Volume 4, Issue 4 (2016), 67 80. ISSN: 2347-1557 Available Online: http://ijmaa.in/ International Journal 2347-1557 of Mathematics Applications And its ISSN: International Journal of Mathematics And its Applications Minkowski Inverse for the Range Symmetric Block Matrix with Two Identical Sub-blocks Over Skew Fields in Minkowski Space M Research Article D.Krishnaswamy 1 and S.Anusuya 1 1 Department of Mathematics, Annamalai University, Annamalai Nagar, Tamilnadu, India. Abstract: Let K be a skew field and K n n be the set of all n n matrices over K. The purpose of this paper is to give some necessary ( ) and sufficient conditions for the existence and the representations of the minkowski inverse of the block matrix A B under some conditions. C D MSC: 15A09, 65F20. Keywords: Skew fields, Block matrix, Minkowski inverse. c JS Publication. 1. Introduction Let K be a skew field, C be the complex number field, K m n be the set of all m n matrices over K, and I n be the n n identity matrix over K. For a matrix A K n n, the matrix X K n n satisfying A k XA = A K, XAX = X, (AX) = AX and (XA) = XA is called the Minkowski inverse of A and is denoted by X = A m. If A m exists if and only if rank(a) = rank(a 2 ) and R(AA m ) = R(A m ) = R(A). we denote I AA m by A π. A matrix A C n n is said to be EP, if AA = A A. A matrix A C n n is G-unitary, if AA = A A = I. The Minkowski Inverse of block matrices has numerous applications in Game Theory, matrix theory such as singular differential and difference equation. In 1979, S. campbell and C. Meyer proposed an open problem to find an explicit representation for the Drazin inverse of a 2 2 block matrix A B, where the blocks A and D are supposed to be square matrices but their sizes need not be the same. A C D simplified problem to find an explicit representation of the Drazin (group) inverse for block matrix A B (A is square, 0 C 0 is null matrix) was proposed by S. Campbell in 1983. This open problem was motivated in hoping to find general expressions for the solutions of the second order system of the differential equations Ex (t) + F x (t) + Gx(t) = 0(t 0), where E is a singular matrix. Detailed discussions of the importance of the problem can be found in [11]. E-mail: @mail.com 67

Minkowski Inverse for the Range Symmetric Block Matrix with Two Identical Sub-blocks Over Skew Fields in Minkowski Space M In this paper, we give the sufficient conditions or the necessary and sufficient conditions for the existance and the representations of the minkowski inverse for block matrix A B (A, Bn K n n ) when A and B satisfy one of the following C D conditions: (1) B m and (B π A) m exist; (2) B m and (AB π ) m exist; (3) B m exists and BAB π = 0; (4) B m exists and B π AB = 0. 2. Preliminaries Lemma 2.1. Let A K n n Then A has a Minkowski Inverse if and only if there exist G-unitary matrices P K n n and A 1 K n n such that A = P A1 0 P and A m = P Am 1 0 P, where rank(a) = r. Proof. Since rank(a) = r, there exists G-unitary matrices P K n n and A K n n, such that A = P A1 0 P, X = P Am 1 0 P (1) AXA = P A1 0 P.P Am 1 0 P.P A1 0 P = P A1Am 1 A 1 0 P = P A1 0 P = A (2) XAX = P Am 1 0 P.P A1 0 P.P Am 1 0 P = P Am 1 0 P = X (3) (AX) = (XA) = (P ) (A1Am 1 ) 0 P. G1 0 P A1Am 1 0 P 0 I n 1 Gm 1 0 0 I Similarly, (XA) = (P ) (A1Am 1 ) 0 P. Therefore (AX) = (XA). Hence X = A m. = (P ) G1(A1Am 1 )G 1 0 P = Lemma 2.2 ([? ]). Let A, G K n n, ind(a) = K. Then G = A D if and only if A K GA = A K, AG = GA, rank(g) rank(a K ). Lemma 2.3. Let A B S = B π AB π, A, B X n n. (i) B m and (B π A) m exist in M then S m and M m exist in M. (ii) If B m exist in M and BAB π = 0, then M m exist if and only if (AB π ) m exist in M. Proof. Suppose rank(b) = r. Applying Lemma 2.1, there exist unitary matrix P C n n and invertible matrix B 1 k r r, 68

D.Krishnaswamy and S.Anusuya such that B = p B1 0 and B m = p B 1 1 0. First we can find B π, B π = I BB m = Ir 0 p B1 0.p B 1 1 0 0 I n r = Ir 0 p 0 I n r B1B 1 1 0 = Ir 0 p I 0 0 I n r = ppr 0 p I 0 0 (pp ) n r = p Ir 0 p I 0 0 I n r B π = p 0 I n r (i) Because (B π A) m exist in M. We have rank(b π A) = rank(b π A) 2. That is B π A = p p A1 A2 0 I n r A 3 A 4 = p A1 A2 0 I n r A 3 A 4 = p 0 + + 0 0 + A 3 0 + A 4 = p A 3 A 4 B π A = p A 3 A 4 Therefore rank(b π A) = rank(a 3A 4) (1) (B π A) 2 = p p A 3 A 4 A 3 A 4 = p. Therefore A 3A 4 (A 4) 2 rank(b π A) 2 = rank(a 3A 4 A 4) (2) 69

Minkowski Inverse for the Range Symmetric Block Matrix with Two Identical Sub-blocks Over Skew Fields in Minkowski Space M Equating (1) and (2), we get rank(a 3 A 4) = rank(a 3A 4 A 2 4) rank(a 4(A 3 A 4)) rank(a 4) and rank(a 3 A 4) rank(a 4) We have rank(a 3 A 4) = rank(a 4), so there exist a matrix x k (n r) r such that A 3 = A 4X. Because order(a 3) = (n r) r and order(a 4X) = (n r) r corresponding entries we also equal. We get rank(a 4) = rank(a 2 4). Therefore A m exist in M. Nothing that S = B π AB π = p p A1 A2 p 0 I n r A 3 A 4 0 I n r = p A1 A2 0 I n r A 3 A 4 0 I n r = p 0 + + 0 0 + A 3 0 + A 4 0 I n r = p A 3 A 4 0 I n r = p 0 + + 0 = p 0 + 0 A 4 0 A 4 S = p 0 A 4 Therefore rank(s) = rank(a 4). Similarly, S 2 = p rank(s 2 ) = rank(a 2 4). Hence rank(a 4) = rank(a 2 4). 0 A 4 A 1 A 2 B 1 0 Which implies rank(s) = rank(s 2 ). Thus rank(s m A 3 A 4 ) exist in M. Since rank(m) = rank = B 1 0 B 1 0 0 A 4 rank By using rank(b 1) = r. Therefore rank(b 1) = r. Also rank(m) = 2r + rank(a 4) and we B 1 0 70

D.Krishnaswamy and S.Anusuya can find rank(m 2 ) By A 3 = A 4X, we get, M 2 = A B A B = A2 + B 2 AB = rank A2 + B 2 AB BA B 2 BA B 2 = rank A2 ABB m B + B 2 0 0 B B1 2 + A 2A 3 A 2A 4 = rank A 4A 3 A 2 4 B1 2 0 rank(m 2 0 A 2 1 ) = B1 2 0 rank(m 2 ) = 2r + rank(a 2 4) and rank(m) = rank(m 2 ). That is M m exist. (ii) If BAB π = 0, then A 2 = 0.Thus AB π = p 0 A 4 A 1 0 B 1 0 B 1 0 A 3 A 4 0 A 4 rank(m) = rank = rank = 2r + rank(a 4). B 1 0 B 1 0 Similarly, rank(m 2 ) = r A2 + B 2 AB = rank A2 ABB m B1 2 0 BA 0 = rank A 4A 3 A 2 BA B 2 4. By A3 = A4X, we get, B 1 2 0 rank(m 2 0 A 2 1 ) = B1 2 0 B1 2 0 rank(m 2 0 A 2 1 ) = B1 2 0 rank(m 2 ) = 2r + rank(a 2 4) As AB π exist in M, we can get rank(a 4)=rank(A 2 4). Thus rank(m)=rank(m 2 ). That is M m exists. Conversely assume that M m exist if and only if rank(m 2 ) = rank(m). rank(a 4) = rank(a 2 4). That is (AB π ) m exist in M. Hence Proved. 71

Minkowski Inverse for the Range Symmetric Block Matrix with Two Identical Sub-blocks Over Skew Fields in Minkowski Space M Lemma 2.4. Let A, B K n n, S = B π AB π suppose B m and (B π A) m exists in M then s m exist in M and the following conclusion holds: (i) B π As m A = B π A (ii) B π AS m = S m AB π (iii) BS m = S m B = B m s m = S m B m = 0. Proof. Suppose rank(b) = r, Applying Lemma 2.1 there exist G-unitary matrix p K n n and B 1 K r r such that B = p B1 0 and B m = p Bm 1 0. Let A = p A1 A2, where A 1 K r r, A 2 K r (n r), A 3 A 3 A 4 K (n r) r, A 4 K (n r) (n r). From Lemma 2.3 (i), we get S m exist in M and S m = p 0 A 4 (i) B π AS π A = p p p A1 A2 A 3 A 4 0 A m 4 A 3 A 4 = p A1 A2 A 3 A 4 0 A m 4 A 3 A 4 = p 0 + + 0 A1 A2 0 A 4A m 4 A 3 A 4 = p 0 + + 0 A1 A2 0 A 4A m 4 A 3 A 4 = p A1 A2 0 A 4A m 4 A 3 A 4 = p 0 + + 0 0 + A 4A m 4 A 3 A 4A m 4 A 4 = p 0 + A 4A m 4 A 3 A 4A m 4 A 4 = p A 3 A 4 (ii) B π AS m = p p A 3 A 4 0 A m 4 = p A 3 A 4 0 A m 4 = p 0 + + 0. 0 + 0 A 4A m 4 72

D.Krishnaswamy and S.Anusuya S m AB π = p p A1 A2 p 0 A m 4 A 3 A 4 0 I n r = p A1 A2 0 A m 4 A 3 A 4 0 I n r = p 0 + + 0 0 + A m 4 A 3 0 + A m 4 A 4 0 I n r = p A m 4 A 3 A m 4 A 4 0 I n r = p 0 + + 0 0 + + A m 4 A 4 S m AB π = p 0 A m 4 A 4 Therefore B π AS m = S m AB π = p. 0 A m 4 A 4 BS m = p B1 0 p 0 A m 4 = p B1 0 0 A m 4 = p 0 + + 0 = 0 0 + + 0 Similarly, S m B = 0. B m S m = p Bm 1 0 p = p = 0. 0 A m 4 Therefore B m S m = 0. Similarly, we can obtain S m B m = 0. Therefore BS m = S m B = B m S m = S m B m. Hence the Lemma. 3. Main Results Theorem 3.1. Let M = A B, where A, B K n n. Suppose B m and (B π A) m exists in M then M m exist in m and M m = U11 U12, where U 21 U 22 U 11 = S m + (S m A I)BB m AB π AS m (S m A I)BB m AB π U 12 = B m S m AB m U 21 = B m B m AS m + B m A(S m A I)BB m AB π B m A(S m A I)BB m AB π AS m 73

Minkowski Inverse for the Range Symmetric Block Matrix with Two Identical Sub-blocks Over Skew Fields in Minkowski Space M U 22 = B m AS m AB m B m AB m S = B π AB π. Proof. The existence of M m and S m in M have given in Lemma 2.3(i). Let X = U11 U12, then MX = A B U11 U12 AU11 + BU21 = U 21 U 22 U 21 U 22 We prove X = M m, AU12 + BU22. AU 11 + BU 21 = A(S m + (S m A I)BB m AB π AS m (S m A I)BB m AB π ) + B(B m B m AS m + B m A(S m A I)BB m AB π B m A(S m A I)BB m AB π AS m ) = AS m + A(S m A I)BB m AB π AS m A(S m A I)BB m AB π ) + BB m BB m AS m + BB m A(S m A I)BB m AB π BB m A(S m A I)BB m AB π AS m ) = BB m + (I BB m )AS m + (I BB m )A(S m A I)BB m AB π AS m (I BB m )(AS m A I)BB m AB π = BB m + B π AS m + B π A(S m A I)BB m AB π AS m B π A(S m I)BB m AB π = BB m + B π AS m + B π ABB m AB π AS m B π ABB m AB π AS m B π ABB m AB π + B π ABB m AB π = B π AS m + BB m and U 11A + U 12B = (S m + (S m A I)BB m AB π AS m (S m A I)BB m AB π )A + (B m S m AB m )B = S m A + (S m A I)BB m AB π AS m A (S m A I)BB m AB π A + B m B S m AB m B = S m A + S m ABB m AB π AS m A BB m AB π AS m A S m ABB m AB π A + BB m AB π A + B m B S m AB m B = S m A(I BB m ) + S m ABB m AB π A BB m AB π A S m ABB m AB π B + BB m AB π A + B m B = S m AB π + BB m = BB m + B π AS m Therefore AU 11 + BU 21 = U 11A + U 12B AU 12 + BU 22 = A(B m S m AB m ) + B(B m AS m AB m B m AB m ) = AB m AS m AB m + BB m AS m AB m BB m AB m = AB m B π AS m AB m BB m AB m = AB m B π AB m BB m AB m = (I BB m )AB m B m AB m = 0 U 11B = (S m + (S m A I)BB m AB π AS m (S m A I)BB m AB π )B = S m B + (S m A I)BB m AB π AS m B (S m A I)BB m AB π B = (S m A I)BB m A(I BB m )B = (S m A I)(BB m AB BB m ABB m B = (S m A I)(BB m AB BB m AB = 0. 74

D.Krishnaswamy and S.Anusuya Therefore AU 12 + BU 22 = U 11B. Similarly, we can get, BU 11 = U 21A + U 22B = BB m AB π (I AS m ) BU 12 = U 21B = BB m. Consequently, (MX) = G1 0 BBm + B π AS m 0 G1 0 0 I BB m AB π (I AS m ) BB m 0 I = G1 0 (BBm + B π AS m ) (BB m AB π (I AS m )) G1 0 0 I 0 (BB m ) 0 I = G1(BBm + B π AS m ) G 1(BB m AB π (I AS m )) G1 0 0 (BB m ) 0 I = G1(BBm + B π AS m ) G 1 G 1(BB m AB π (I AS m )) 0 (BB m ) Therefore (MX) = (BBm + B π AS m ) G 1(BB m AB π (I AS m )). Similarly, 0 (BB m ) (XM) = (BBm + B π AS m ) G 1(BB m AB π (I AS m )) 0 (BB m ) MXM = BBm + B π AS m 0 A B BB m AB π (I AS m ) BB m BB m A + B π AS m A BB m B + B π AS m B = BB m AB π (I AS m )A + BB m B BB m AB π (I AS m )B BB m A + (I BB m )AS m A B = BB m AB π A BB m AB π AS m A + B BB m AB π B BB m AB π AS m )B BB m A + A BB m )A B = BB m AB π A BB m AB π AS m A + B BB m AB π B BB m AB π AS m B = BBm A + A BB m )A B B BB m AB BB m ABB m B = A B. Therefore MXM = M. Suppose rank(b) = r. By Lemma 2.1, there exist G-unitary matrices P K n n and invertible matrices B = P B1 0 P and B m = P Bm 1 0 P. Let A = P A1 A2 P, where A 1 K r r, A 2 K r (n r), A 3 A 3 A 4 75

Minkowski Inverse for the Range Symmetric Block Matrix with Two Identical Sub-blocks Over Skew Fields in Minkowski Space M K (n r) r, A 4 K (n r) (n r). Since X = U11 U12 U 21 U 22 rank(x) = rank U11 U12 U 21 U 22 = rank Sm + (S m A I)BB m AB π AS m (S m A I)BB m AB π B m S m AB m B m 0 = rank Sm B m S m AB m B m 0 B 1 1 0 0 A m 4 = rank B 1 0 = 2r + rank(a m 4 ) rank(x) = 2r + rank(a m 4 ) = 2r + rank(a 4) = rank(m) From Lemma 2.3, we get X = M m. Theorem 3.2. Let M = A B, where A, B K n n, suppose B m and (AB π ) m exists in M then M m exist in M and M m = U11 U12, where U 21 U 22 U 11 = S m + S m AB π ABB m (AS m I ) B π ABB m (AS m I ) U 12 = B m S m AB m S m AB π S m AB π ABB m (AS m I)AB m + B π ABB m (I AS m )AB m U 21 = B m B m AS m U 22 = B m AS m AB m B m AB m S = B π AB π. Theorem 3.3. Let M = A B, where A, B K n n, suppose B m exists in M and BAB π = 0 then (i). M m exists in M iff (AB π ) m exists in M. (ii). If M m exists in M, then M m = U B m V, where B m AB m U = B π A(B m ) 2 (AB π ) m AB π A(B m ) 2 + (AB π ) m V = B π A(B m ) 2 AB m + (AB π ) m AB π A(B m ) 2 AB m (AB π ) m AB m + B m. 76

D.Krishnaswamy and S.Anusuya Proof. (i) The existence of M m has been given in Lemma 2.3 (ii) (ii) Let X = U B m V then B m AB m MX = A B U XM = U B m B m V AU + BBm = AV BB m AB m B m AB m BU BV V A B = UA + V B B m AB m B m AB π UB B m B AU + BB m = AB π A(B m ) 2 A(AB π ) m AB π A(B m ) 2 + A(AB π ) m + BB m = AB π A(B m ) 2 AB π A(B m ) 2 + A(AB π ) m + BB m = A(AB π ) m + BB m UA + V B = (B π A(B m ) 2 (AB π ) m AB π A(B m ) 2 + (AB π ) m )A + ( B π A(B m ) 2 AB m + (AB π ) m AB π A(B m ) 2 AB m (AB π ) m AB m + B m )B = B π A(B m ) 2 A (AB π ) m AB π A(B m ) 2 A + (AB π ) m A B π A(B m ) 2 AB m B (AB π ) m AB π A(B m ) 2 AB m B (AB π ) m AB m B + B m B = B π A(B m ) 2 A(I BB m ) (AB π ) m AB π A(B m ) 2 A(I BB m ) + (AB π ) m A(I BB m ) + BB m = B π A(B m ) 2 AB π (AB π ) m AB π A(B m ) 2 AB π + (AB π ) m AB π + BB m = (AB π ) m AB π + BB m = A(AB π ) m + BB m. Therefore AU + BB m = UA + V B. AV BB m AB m = A( B π A(B m ) 2 AB m + (AB π ) m AB π A(B m ) 2 AB m (AB π ) m AB m + B m ) BB m AB m = AB π A(B m ) 2 AB m + A(AB π ) m AB π A(B m ) 2 AB m A(AB π ) m AB m + AB m BB m AB m = AB π A(B m ) 2 AB m + AB π A(B m ) 2 AB m A(AB π ) m AB m (I BB m )AB m = A(AB π ) m AB m + B m AB m UB = [B π A(B m ) 2 (AB π ) m AB π A(B m ) 2 + (AB π ) m ]B = B π A(B m ) 2 B (AB π ) m AB π A(B m ) 2 B + (AB π ) m B = B π AB m B (AB π ) m AB π AB m B + (AB π ) m B = B π AB m BB m (AB π ) m AB π AB m BB m + (AB π ) m B = B π AB m (AB π ) m AB π AB m + (AB π ) m B = B π AB m A(AB π ) m AB m + (AB π ) m B = A(AB π ) m AB m + B π AB m. 77

Minkowski Inverse for the Range Symmetric Block Matrix with Two Identical Sub-blocks Over Skew Fields in Minkowski Space M Hence AV BB m AB m = UB. BU = B[B π A(B m ) 2 (AB π ) m AB π A(B m ) 2 + (AB π ) m ] = BB π A(B m ) 2 B(AB π ) m AB π A(B m ) 2 + B(AB π ) m = B(I B m )A(B m ) 2 = BA(B m ) 2 BB m A(B m ) 2 = BA(B m ) 2 BB m BA(B m ) 2 = BA(B m ) 2 BA(B m ) 2 = 0. B m AB π = 0. Hence BU = B m AB π. BV = B[ B π A(B m ) 2 AB m + (AB π ) m AB π A(B m ) 2 AB m (AB π ) m AB m + B m ] = BB π A(B m ) 2 AB m + B(AB π ) m AB π A(B m ) 2 AB m B(AB π ) m AB m + BB m = B(I BB m )A(B m ) 2 AB m + BB m = BA(B m ) 2 AB m + BBB m A(B m ) 2 AB m + BB m = BA(B m ) 2 AB m + BB m BA(B m ) 2 AB m + B m B = BA(B m ) 2 AB m + BA(B m ) 2 AB m + B m B = B m B. Hence BV = B m B. Consequently, (MX) = G1 0 A(ABπ ) m + BB m A(AB π ) m AB m + B π AB m 0 I 0 B m B = G1(A(ABπ ) m + BB m ) G 1 0 (A(AB π ) m AB m + B π AB m ) G 1 (B m B) = (A(AB π ) m + BB m ) 0. (A(AB π ) m AB m + B π AB m ) G 1 (B m B) Similarly, (XM) = (A(AB π ) m + BB m ) 0. (A(AB π ) m AB m + B π AB m ) G 1 (B m B) MXM = A(ABπ ) m + BB m A(AB π ) m AB m + B π AB m A B 0 B m B G1 0 0 I = A(ABπ ) m A + BB m A A(AB π ) m AB m B + B π AB m B A(AB π ) m B + BB m B BB m = A B. 78

D.Krishnaswamy and S.Anusuya Therefore MXM = M. Suppose rank(b) = r. By Lemma 2.1, there exist G-unitary matrices P K n n and invertible matrices B 1 K r r such that B = P B1 0 P and B m = P Bm 1 0 P. Let A = P A1 A2 P, where A 1 A 3 A 4 K r r, A 2 K r (n r), A 3 K (n r) r, A 4 K (n r) (n r). Then rank(x) = rank U B m V B m AB m = rank U Bm B m 0 = rank (ABπ ) m B m B m 0 B 1 1 0 0 A m 4 = rank B 1 0 = 2r + rank(a m 4 ). Since rank(m) = 2r + rank(a 4) = rank(r). Then X = M m. Theorem 3.4. Let M = A B, where A, B K n n, suppose B m exists in M and B π AB = 0 then (i). M m exists in M iff (B π A) m exists in M. (ii). If M m exists in M, then M m = U Bm, where V B m AB m U = (B m ) 2 AB π (B m ) 2 AB π A(B π A) m + (B π A) m, V = B m B m B π + B m A(B m ) 2 AB π A(B π A) m B m A(B π A) m + B m. References [1] A.Ben-Israel and T.N.E.Greville, Generalized inverses: Theory and applications, Second ed., Springer-Verlag, New York, (2003). [2] K.P.S.Bhaskara Rao, The theory of generalized inverses over commutative rings, Taylor and Francis, London and New York, (2002). [3] R.Bru, C.Coll and N.Thome, Symmetric singular linear control systems, Appl. Math. Letters, 15(2002), 671-675. [4] C.Bu, J.Zhao and J.Zheng, Group inverse for a Class 2 2 block matrices over skew fields, Applied Math. Comput., 24(2008), 45-49. [5] C.Bu, J.Zhao and K.Zhang, Some results on group inverses of block matrices over skew fields, Electronic Journal of Linear Algebra, 18(2009), 117-125. [6] C.Bu, M.Li, K.Zhang and L.Zheng, Group inverse for the block matrices with an invertible subblock, Appl. Math. Comput., 215(2009), 132-139. 79

Minkowski Inverse for the Range Symmetric Block Matrix with Two Identical Sub-blocks Over Skew Fields in Minkowski Space M [7] C.Bu, K.Zhang and J.Zhao, Some results on the group inverse of the block matrix with a sub-block of linear combination or product combination of matrices over skew fields, Linear and Multilinear Algebra, 58(8)(2010), 957-966. [8] C.Cao, Some results of group inverses for partitioned matrices over skew fields, J. of Natural Science of Heilongjiang University, 18(3)(2001), 5-7. [9] C.Cao and X.Tang, Representations of the group inverse of some 2 2 block matrices, International Mathematical Forum, 31(2006), 1511-1517. [10] N.Castro-Gonzalez and E.Dopazo, Representations of the Drazin inverse of a class of block matrices, Linear Algebra Appl., 400(2005), 253-269. [11] N.Castro-Gonzalez, E.Dopazo and M.F.Martinez-Scrrano, On the Drazin inverse of the sum of two operators and its application to operator matrices, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 350(2009), 207-215. 80