datapreviously available may be found in the two former discussions of the EXTRAGALA CTIC NEB ULAE velocity-distance relation.

Similar documents
View of the Galaxy from within. Lecture 12: Galaxies. Comparison to an external disk galaxy. Where do we lie in our Galaxy?

Hie-Joon Kim. Professor Emeritus Seoul National University. Experience. Representative Publications

Astronomy 25. Astronomy 25. Anything back then that could not be seen clearly was called a nebulae. detect fuzzy light objects.

Arguments for a Hubble Constant near H 0 =55

NOTE ON THE VELOCITIES AND MAGNITUDES OF EXTERNAL GALAXIES By HARLOW SHAPLPY

The cosmic distance scale

S part in the measurement of distances to the star clouds

BHS Astronomy: Galaxy Classification and Evolution

A PRELIMINARY CLASSIFICATION SCHEME FOR THE CENTRAL REGIONS OF LATE-TYPE GALAXIES

International Herald Tribune, November 1, 1907

An Introduction to Galaxies and Cosmology. Jun 29, 2005 Chap.2.1~2.3

Quasars and Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN)

The Discovery of Other Galaxies. 24. Normal Galaxies

Page # Astronomical Distances. Lecture 2. Astronomical Distances. Cosmic Distance Ladder. Distance Methods. Size of Earth

Laboratory: Milky Way

In the centre of the galaxies is where most of the stars are concentrated. Each object from a galaxy moves because of the others attraction.

The Next 2-3 Weeks. Important to read through Chapter 17 (Relativity) before I start lecturing on it.

Outline. The Rotation of the Galaxy. Astronomy: The Big Picture

GLOBULAR CLUSTERS AND THE STRUCTURE OF THE GALACTIC SYSTEM By Harlow Shapley

advisable to measure and publish all possible details on each system. But

Survey of Astrophysics A110

Galaxies. Lecture Topics. Lecture 23. Discovering Galaxies. Galaxy properties. Local Group. History Cepheid variable stars. Classifying galaxies

Tour of Galaxies. Sgr A* VLT in IR + adaptive optics. orbits. ASTR 1040 Accel Astro: Stars & Galaxies VLT IR+AO

SKINAKAS OBSERVATORY. Astronomy Projects for University Students PROJECT GALAXIES

Galaxies. Nebulae. Virgo Cluster of Galaxies sky.google.com

Tour of Galaxies. stuff: dust SEMI-WARM. ASTR 1040 Accel Astro: Stars & Galaxies. Dust+dark molecular clouds. in close-up VLT.

THE HUBBLE SEQUENCE. This use case explores the morphology of galaxies and their classification according to the Hubble Sequence.

Galaxies. Early Attempts to catalog and classify. Messier Catalog. "The Great Debate" PHY galaxies - J. Hedberg

THE LOCAL SYSTEM AND THE HENRY DRAPER EXTENSION

PHY 475/375. Lecture 2. (March 28, 2012) The Scale of the Universe: The Shapley-Curtis Debate

There are three basic types of galaxies:

4/6/17. SEMI-WARM stuff: dust. Tour of Galaxies. Our Schedule

Normal Galaxies ASTR 2120 Sarazin

Clicker Question: Galaxy Classification. What type of galaxy do we live in? The Variety of Galaxy Morphologies Another barred galaxy

American Astronomical Society Provided by the NASA Astrophysics Data System

A TECHNICAL DISCUSSION OF EXACTLY WHAT VESTO SLIPHER DID TO MAKE HIS REVOLUTIONARY OBSERVATIONS Highlights of early spectroscopy (including those of E

Galaxies. Early Attempts to catalog and classify. Messier Catalog. "The Great Debate"

11/8/18. Tour of Galaxies. Our Schedule

2. Can observe radio waves from the nucleus see a strong radio source there Sagittarius A* or Sgr A*.

Lecture 27 Galaxy Types and the Distance Ladder December 3, 2018

April 11, Astronomy Notes Chapter 16.notebook. Types of Galaxies

star in their observing programs during the coming season, the following résumé of our findings is presented.

24.1 Hubble s Galaxy Classification

THE HUBBLE SEQUENCE. Information and contacts: -

The physical properties of galaxies in Universe

Astr 5465 Feb. 13, 2018 Distribution & Classification of Galaxies Distribution of Galaxies

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

11/9/2010. Stars, Galaxies & the Universe Announcements. Sky & Telescope s Week at a Glance. iphone App available now.

Chapter 17. Galaxies. Copyright The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display.

There are three main ways to derive q 0 :

ASTRONOMY II Spring 1995 FINAL EXAM. Monday May 8th 2:00pm

Luminosity Functions of Planetary Nebulae & Globular Clusters. By Azmain Nisak ASTR 8400

Chapter 11 The Superuniverse Wall

The Milky Way Galaxy Guiding Questions

The Milky Way Galaxy

Lecture 32: The Expanding Universe Readings: Sections 26-5 and 28-2

Today s Topics & Events

Figure 1: (Image Credit)

Techniques for measuring astronomical distances generally come in two variates, absolute and relative.

5 Dark matter and dark energy, the Universe revealed

Today in Astronomy 142: the Milky Way

It is about 100,000 ly across, 2,000 ly thick, and our solar system is located 26,000 ly away from the center of the galaxy.

Ph.D. (1909) Indiana University

The History and Philosophy of Astronomy

The Milky Way Galaxy. Some thoughts. How big is it? What does it look like? How did it end up this way? What is it made up of?

Chapter 30. Galaxies and the Universe. Chapter 30:

The Cosmological Distance Ladder. It's not perfect, but it works!

Planetary Nebulae beyond the Milky Way historical overview

CALCULATING DISTANCES. Cepheids and RR Lyrae India Jackson-Henry

Deep Surveys or How We Learn About the Early Universe When We Can t Measure All that Would Be Nice!

ASTRO504 Extragalactic Astronomy. 2. Classification

2 Galaxy morphology and classification

Galaxy Classification

Lecture 19: Galaxies. Astronomy 111

Lecture Outlines. Chapter 23. Astronomy Today 8th Edition Chaisson/McMillan Pearson Education, Inc.

Figure 19.19: HST photo called Hubble Deep Field.

Edwin Hubble Changed Our Ideas About the Universe

Part two of a year-long introduction to astrophysics:

The Galaxy. (The Milky Way Galaxy)

STRUCTURE OF GALAXIES

Galaxies and Supermassive Black Holes

A Tour of the Messier Catalog. ~~ in ~~ Eight Spellbinding and Enlightening Episodes. ~~ This Being Episode Six ~~ Voyage to the Center of the Galaxy

Earth Science, 13e Tarbuck & Lutgens

Lecture Outlines. Chapter 24. Astronomy Today 8th Edition Chaisson/McMillan Pearson Education, Inc.

Galaxies The Hubble Sequence Different Types of Galaxies 4 broad Morphological Types created by Edwin Hubble Galaxies come is a variety of shapes and

Hubble Ultra Deep Space View

11. Virial Theorem Distances of Spiral and Elliptical Galaxies

The separate formation of different galaxy components

V. M. Slipher ( ) was an astronomer who worked at Lowell Observatory in Flagstaff, Arizona. In 1909 he began studying the spectrum of the

The King's University College Astronomy 201 Mid-Term Exam Solutions

Spatial distribution of stars in the Milky Way

Unit 7 Review Guide: The Universe

DEFUSING THE DIFFUSION OF INCORRECT KNOWLEDGE: HOOKE'S PARALLAX, VAN MAANEN'S ROTATIONS, AND THE RESOLUTION OF ORION. Berry College Mount Berry, GA

UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON. PHAS : The Classication of Galaxies. and the Hubble Deep Field

Summary: Nuclear burning in stars

Classification Distribution in Space Galaxy Clusters. Formation and Evolution Hubble s Law

Chapter 19 Galaxies. Hubble Ultra Deep Field: Each dot is a galaxy of stars. More distant, further into the past. halo

VM Slipher and the discovery of the expanding universe The Big Bang: Fact or Fiction?

PUBLICATIONS OF THE ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY OF THE PACIFIC. Vol. 68 February 1956 No. 400 THE PERIOD-LUMINOSITY RELATION OF THE CEPHEIDS*

ASTRONOMY. Chapter 18 THE STARS: A CELESTIAL CENSUS PowerPoint Image Slideshow

Transcription:

264 ASTRONOMY: HUBBLE AND HUMASON PRoc. N. A. S. THE VELOCITY-DISTANCE RELATION FOR ISOLATED EXTRAGALA CTIC NEB ULAE BY EDWIN HUBBLE AND MILTON L. HUMASON MouNr WILSON OBSERVATORY, CARNEGIE INSTITUTION OF WASHINGTON Read before the Academy, Monday, April 23, 1934 The velocity-distance relation was first established' for a few nebulae whose distances were derived from involved stars. With the aid of data from clusters whose relative distances were estimated from the mean apparent magnitudes of the many members of each cluster, the relation was confirmed in the form2 which, since leads to the linear relation logv = 0.2 m + 0.51, log d m - M+5 *V = lo(0.2m - 0-4 where M is the mean absolute magnitude of cluster nebulae. In both cases the isolated nebulae in which no stars were detected, i.e., nebulae for which total luminosity must serve as a criterion of distance, were used in general for confirming the order of the results rather than for their precise formulation. This procedure was employed because of the rather large effects resulting from the selection of isolated nebulae according to apparent magnitude, which the data were insufficient to evaluate. Mr. Humason has since accumulated velocities for 35 isolated nebulae, which, together with the 50 previously available, form a body of data adequate for the purpose. The new data are listed in table 1, in which the magnitudes are taken from the convenient Harvard Survey of the brighter nebulae, with the exception of the 6 faintest, which represent estimates by one of the writers. The velocities, in km. per sec., are not corrected for solar motion. The datapreviously available may be found in the two former discussions of the velocity-distance relation. Actually, 94 velocities are available, but 9 have been rejected, of which 7 belong to our own local group and give velocities that are mere reflections of the rotation of the galactic system (the two satellites of the galactic system, namely, the Magellanic Clouds, M 31 with its two satellites, M 33, and NGC 6822); one, IC 342, a large open spiral at latitude + 120 and obviously affected by local obscuration, may belong to the same category;

VOL. 20, 1934 ASTRONOMY: HUBBLE AND HUMA SON 265 and finally NGC 404, v = + 40 (corrected for solar motion), mpg =, an exceptional case which would unduly influence the correlation under investigation. NGC 404 is not necessarily inconsistent, since permissible values of absolute magnitude and peculiar motion may be assigned which would account for the apparent discrepancy. NGC 157 628 720 722 1084 1087 1332 1407 IC 342 N1 2403 2655 2768 2775 2787 2903 3147 3344 3351 TYPE E5 Sb El EO SC E6 SBa SBc SBb TABLE 1 RADIAL VELOCITIES OF mpg 11.7 11.4 12.5 (14.0)* 16.0* 10.2 12.1 10.3 11.9 11.9 V +1800 600 1800 2200 1450 1850 500 +2000-25 +4600 125 1350 1100 700 350 2600 550 + 700 ISOLATED NEBULAE NGC TYPE 3377 E5 3384 SBa 3412 SBa 3414 SBb 3486 N2 3726 5253 5846 5982 6946 7177 7343 7727 7814 E SC Ir** EO E3 Sbc SBb mpg 11.3 12.2 11.4 17.5* 11.7 10.8 12.7* 11.1 12.1 14. 1* 12.4 V + 650 850 950 1450 1250 19000 1150 400 1700 +2900-150 +1300 1200 1800 +1000 * Magnitudes estimated at Mount Wilson; that for IC 342 is very uncertain. ** Emission spectrum. Type uncertain since the possibility that the object is a planetary is not ruled out. The point is important because of the nova Z Centauri, which appeared in this nebula and attained a maximum many times the total luminosity of the nebula. N1 and N2 are faint nebulae at R. A. = 4h 37'O; Dec. = +407' and R. A. = 10h 54'.0; Dec. = +570 12' (1930), respectively. N2 is within the field of a very faint cluster found by Dr. Baade but is about 0.5 mag. brighter than the estimated upper limit of the cluster nebulae. The spectrum was observed on the slight chance that the nebula might be an outstanding member of the cluster. The red-shift actually observed is about half the value predicted for the cluster and hence the nebula is very probably a normal field nebula. Figure 1 exhibits the correlation between m (from the Harvard Survey or from Mount Wilson estimates), corrected for local obscuration,3 and log v, corrected for solar motion,' for the 85 remaining nebulae. A linear

266 ASTRONOMY: HUBBLE AND HUMASON PNoc. N. A. S. correlation is evident, and a least-squares solution, with the data grouped according to log v, leads to the relation log v = (0.203 0.010)m + 0.67. When the precisely linear coefficient of m, namely, 0.2, is adopted, the relation, together with that derived from the clusters, is Isolated Neb. Clusters log v = 0.2m + 0.71 logv = 0.2m + 0.51 0.20 a = 0.862 0.2 X 1.38q2 = 0.20 The significance of a, the dispersion, will be discussed later. The relation for isolated nebulae parallels that for the clusters but is displaced just one %Wy.ocAty.DL*tanc ReLatLon for I&oL&ted NebuL&e FIGURE 1 magnitude toward the brighter side. This displacement represents the effect of selection. The luminosity function of nebulae (the frequency distribution of absolute magnitudes for the nebulae in a given volume of space) approximates a normal error-curve with a maximum at Mo and with a dispersion rather uncertainly estimated at less than a magnitude. The density function, at least on the grand scale, is approximately constant. These conditions represent the classical example of the simplest case in statistical studies of stellar distribution, which has been fully discussed by Malmquist.4 The point of immediate interest is the frequency distribution of absolute magnitudes among nebulae of a given apparent magnitude. This function is found to be another normal error-curve, with the same dispersion as the

VOL. 20, 1934 ASTRONOM Y: HUBBLE AND HUMA SON 267 luminosity function but with the maximum, M, displaced toward the brighter side by the amount Mo- M = 1.38a2, where the coefficient is 0.6 loge 10. In other words, when nebulae are selected on the basis of apparent magnitude, the absolute magnitudes are too bright by the systematic term 1.38o.2. Since the effect of selection applies to the isolated nebulae and not to the 10~ ~ ~ 0 1 LO +1M-M 1 - Frequency DLstrLbutLon of ResLduaLs Ln VeLocLty-Distance ReLiation FIGURE 2 The smooth curve is a normal error-curve with a dispersion of 0.86. Numbers of nebulae in intervals of 0.3 mag. are represented by dots; overlapping means for three successive intervals, by open circles. Two nebulae fall outside the limits of the diagram: On the brighter side, NGC 4594, whose magnitude is very uncertain; on the fainter side, NGC 6946, whose observed velocity is small compared with the average peculiar motion of nebulae. clusters, the observed displacement in the velocity-distance relation is in the direction and of the order to be expected. The displacement represents a dispersion = ~020.20 = 0.86, 0.2 X 1.38 which agrees with the dispersion derived from the residuals themselves, namely, 0. 862. The frequency distribution of the residuals is exhibited in figure 2. The precise agreement is a coincidence, since the residuals include all errors and peculiar motions and hence lead to a value larger than the true dispersion, while the data for the clusters when slightly revised

268 GENETICS: PLO UGH AND IVES PROC. N. A. S. for galactic obscuration, etc., give a slightly smaller displacement. These second-order corrections, together with the effect of magnitude errors, will be more fully discussed in a Contribution from, the Mount Wilson Observatory. Meanwhile it is evident that, within the small uncertainties, the isolated nebulae exhibit the same relation as the cluster nebulae and hence that their luminosity functions are closely similar. The important quantity Mo is most reliably derived from the Virgo Cluster whose distance is indicated by stars involved in the later-type spirals. Reexamination of data available at present suggests no significant revision of the earlier estimate,2-13.8, although the round number -14 might be used with about equal justification pending the detailed analysis of the Virgo Cluster. The statistical correction, Mo - M, affects investigations of distribution by counts of nebulae and reduces the previously3 estimated values of the density of matter in the observable region by a factor of the order of three. At great distances the correction diminishes as the red-shifts increase, and beyond about the nineteenth magnitude the variation cannot be ignored. 1 Mount Wilson Comm., No. 105; Proc. Nat. Acad. i., 15, 168-173 (1929). 2 Mount Wilson Contr., No. 427; Astrophys. J., 74, 43-80 (1931). 3 Magnitudes are corrected for galactic latitude by the cosecant law Am = 0.15 (cosec,6-1). Mt. Wilson Contr., No. 485; Astrophys. J., 79, 8-76 (1934). The corrections are required by the fact that most of the faint nebulae are in very low latitudes. 4 K. G. Malmquist, "On Some Relations in Stellar Statistics," Arkiv for Matematik. Astronomi och Fysik, Stockholm, 16, No. 23 (1921). HEAT INDUCED MUTATIONS IN DROSOPHILA BY H. H. PLOUGH AND P. T. IvEs DEPARTMENT OF BIOLOGY, AMHERST COLLEGE Communicated March 28, 1934 Although irradiation by x-rays remains the only reliable method for inducing mutations artificially, the discovery by Goldschmidt1 that gene mutations were induced by exposing larvae of Drosophila for 24 hours to a sub-lethal temperature of 360 has stimulated interest in the problem of the origin of mutations in nature. The result had been suggested by the previous work of Muller and Altenberg2 and of Muller,3 but the results of Goldschmidt and more recently of his co-worker Joblos4 constitute an important contribution to genetics which is the more interesting since there have been so many previous breeding experiments with Drosophila at,