Stochastic Frontier Estimation Capabilities: LIMDEP and Stata (Richard Hofler, University of Central Florida)

Similar documents
Estimation of Efficiency with the Stochastic Frontier Cost. Function and Heteroscedasticity: A Monte Carlo Study

We automate the bivariate change-of-variables technique for bivariate continuous random variables with

An Introduction to Geostatistics

Estimating Production Uncertainty in Stochastic Frontier Production Function Models

MATH2715: Statistical Methods

Reduction of over-determined systems of differential equations

University of Bristol

Self-induced stochastic resonance in excitable systems

Study on the Mathematic Model of Product Modular System Orienting the Modular Design

ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY IN HIGH-TECHNOLOGY MARKETS: THE COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE OF THE HAVES

The Open Civil Engineering Journal

ON TRANSIENT DYNAMICS, OFF-EQUILIBRIUM BEHAVIOUR AND IDENTIFICATION IN BLENDED MULTIPLE MODEL STRUCTURES

Complex Tire-Ground Interaction Simulation: Recent Developments Of An Advanced Shell Theory Based Tire Model

Low-emittance tuning of storage rings using normal mode beam position monitor calibration

Essays on Characterizing Inefficiency for Stochastic Frontier Models

Deconstructing Intra-Industry Trade. With Special Reference to EU-Trade

DIRECTLY MODELING VOICED AND UNVOICED COMPONENTS IN SPEECH WAVEFORMS BY NEURAL NETWORKS. Keiichi Tokuda Heiga Zen

arxiv: v2 [stat.ap] 22 Dec 2016

Department of Industrial Engineering Statistical Quality Control presented by Dr. Eng. Abed Schokry

1 The space of linear transformations from R n to R m :

A New Approach to Direct Sequential Simulation that Accounts for the Proportional Effect: Direct Lognormal Simulation

EOQ Problem Well-Posedness: an Alternative Approach Establishing Sufficient Conditions

LPV control of an active vibration isolation system

Chapter 15 Panel Data Models. Pooling Time-Series and Cross-Section Data

Equivalence between transition systems. Modal logic and first order logic. In pictures: forth condition. Bisimilation. In pictures: back condition

Artificial Noise Revisited: When Eve Has more Antennas than Alice

Direct linearization method for nonlinear PDE s and the related kernel RBFs

Sources of Non Stationarity in the Semivariogram

THREE AXIS CON TROL OF THE HUB BLE SPACE TELE SCOPE USING TWO RE AC TION WHEELS AND MAG NETIC TORQUER BARS FOR SCI ENCE OB SER VA TIONS

An experimental analysis of canopy flows

ESTIMATING FARM EFFICIENCY IN THE PRESENCE OF DOUBLE HETEROSCEDASTICITY USING PANEL DATA K. HADRI *

Estimation of Theoretically Consistent Stochastic Frontier Functions in R

Distributed Weighted Vertex Cover via Maximal Matchings

Appendix Proof. Proposition 1. According to steady-state demand condition,

Spatial Stochastic frontier models: Instructions for use

METHODOLOGY AND APPLICATIONS OF. Andrea Furková

CHAPTER (i) No. For each coefficient, the usual standard errors and the heteroskedasticity-robust ones are practically very similar.

ANOVA INTERPRETING. It might be tempting to just look at the data and wing it

Analytical Value-at-Risk and Expected Shortfall under Regime Switching *

Exercise 4. An optional time which is not a stopping time

SUPPLEMENT TO STRATEGIC TRADING IN INFORMATIONALLY COMPLEX ENVIRONMENTS (Econometrica, Vol. 86, No. 4, July 2018, )

Modelling Efficiency Effects in a True Fixed Effects Stochastic Frontier

Modelling, Simulation and Control of Quadruple Tank Process

Deriving Some Estimators of Panel Data Regression Models with Individual Effects

Universities of Leeds, Sheffield and York

applications to the cases of investment and inflation January, 2001 Abstract

ON THE PERFORMANCE OF LOW

Modeling Long Probes in Flowing Plasmas using KiPS-2D, a Novel Steady-State Vlasov Solver

i=1 y i 1fd i = dg= P N i=1 1fd i = dg.

Complexity of the Cover Polynomial

Feature extraction: Corners and blobs

Modeling GARCH processes in Panel Data: Theory, Simulations and Examples

The Dual of the Maximum Likelihood Method

Formal Methods for Deriving Element Equations

MORE ON WHAT IS CAVITATION? (cont.) Jacques Chaurette p. eng., Fluide Design Inc. February 2003

Regression Analysis of Octal Rings as Mechanical Force Transducers

ERAD THE SEVENTH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON RADAR IN METEOROLOGY AND HYDROLOGY

Small area estimation under a two-part random effects model with application to estimation of literacy in developing countries

Numerical Simulation of Density Currents over a Slope under the Condition of Cooling Period in Lake Biwa

Chapter 6 Momentum Transfer in an External Laminar Boundary Layer

A Count Data Frontier Model

Formulas for stopped diffusion processes with stopping times based on drawdowns and drawups

The Faraday Induction Law and Field Transformations in Special Relativity

Formation and Transition of Delta Shock in the Limits of Riemann Solutions to the Perturbed Chromatography Equations

Using copulas to model time dependence in stochastic frontier models

Lecture 21: Physical Brownian Motion II

Sibuya s Measure of Local Dependence

Discussion of The Forward Search: Theory and Data Analysis by Anthony C. Atkinson, Marco Riani, and Andrea Ceroli

Principles of Safe Policy Routing Dynamics

VIBRATION MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY AND RELIABILITY DIAGNOSTICS RESULTS IN ROTATING SYSTEMS

On the Total Duration of Negative Surplus of a Risk Process with Two-step Premium Function

Flood flow at the confluence of compound river channels

Minimizing Intra-Edge Crossings in Wiring Diagrams and Public Transportation Maps

Numerical Model for Studying Cloud Formation Processes in the Tropics

arxiv: v1 [physics.comp-ph] 17 Jan 2014

E64: Panel Data Stochastic Frontier Models

KINETIC EQUATIONS WITH INTERMOLECULAR POTENTIALS: AVOIDING THE BOLTZMANN ASSUMPTION

A Survey of Stochastic Frontier Models and Likely Future Developments

Context Fusion for Driveability Analysis

ON PREDATOR-PREY POPULATION DYNAMICS UNDER STOCHASTIC SWITCHED LIVING CONDITIONS

To pose an abstract computational problem on graphs that has a huge list of applications in web technologies

Visual Servoing via Nonlinear Predictive Control

Review of WINBUGS. 1. Introduction. by Harvey Goldstein Institute of Education University of London

Linear Strain Triangle and other types of 2D elements. By S. Ziaei Rad

PROBABILISTIC APPROACHES TO STABILITY AND DEFORMATION PROBLEMS IN BRACED EXCAVATION

The Numerical Simulation of Enhanced Heat Transfer Tubes

Public Sector Management I

CONTINUOUS PLSI AND SMOOTHING TECHNIQUES FOR HYBRID MUSIC RECOMMENDATION

New York University Department of Economics. Applied Statistics and Econometrics G Spring 2013

A New Method for Calculating of Electric Fields Around or Inside Any Arbitrary Shape Electrode Configuration

RESGen: Renewable Energy Scenario Generation Platform

2 Faculty of Mechanics and Mathematics, Moscow State University.

Online Companion to Pricing Services Subject to Congestion: Charge Per-Use Fees or Sell Subscriptions?

Can a traveling wave connect two unstable states? The case of the nonlocal Fisher equation

Control Performance Monitoring of State-Dependent Nonlinear Processes

ON THE SHAPES OF BILATERAL GAMMA DENSITIES

Instability of Relevance-Ranked Results Using Latent Semantic Indexing for Web Search

A Proposed Method for Reliability Analysis in Higher Dimension

OPTIMIZATION ASPECTS ON MODIFICATION OF STARCH USING ELECTRON BEAM IRRADIATION FOR THE SYNTHESIS OF WATER-SOLUBLE COPOLYMERS

Nonlinear Dynamics of Thick Composite Laminated Plates Including the Effect of Transverse Shear and Rotary Inertia

Transcription:

Stochastic Frontier Estimation Capabilies: LIMDEP and (Richard Hofler, Uniersy of Central Florida) PREFACE Stochastic Frontier and Data Enelopment Analysis Software Only two of the large integrated econometrics programs crrently in general se proide programs and rotines for frontier and efficiency analysis, LIMDEP/NLOGIT and. The freeware program, FRONTIER 4.1 by Tim Coelli (find on the web) can also be sed for a small range of stochastic frontier models. FRONTIER is now rather old, howeer, and is not being pdated or maintained. This docment, prepared by Richard Hofler of the Uniersy of Central Florida, compares the capabilies of LIMDEP and for estimation of stochastic frontier models. The description is crrent as of 006. Some addional capabilies hae since been added to LIMDEP, notably the simlation based estimator for a sample selection corrected stochastic frontier model. Other featres and models are added to LIMDEP on an ongoing basis this will be one of the sbstantie pdates in the next ersion of LIMDEP (10.0) To my knowledge, no frther deelopment of the frontier capabilies beyond those listed here has been done or is ongoing in. Data Enelopment Analysis There are seeral packages that specialize in Data Enelopment Analysis (DEA) a search of the web for this topic will amply demonstrate the ariety of tools aailable for this mini-indstry. Some of them are qe extensie. LIMDEP also contains a program for data enelopment analysis. To my knowledge, LIMDEP is the only program (small or large) that proides both stochastic frontier and DEA capabilies. This rotine is, as of early 008, also ndergoing deelopment and will be extended in ersion 10.0 of LIMDEP. This docment does not describe featres of LIMDEP related to DEA. Tim Coelli has also deeloped another, separate program, DEAP for data enelopment analysis. Like FRONTIER, howeer, DEAP is rather old 1996, and is not crrent wh methodological deelopments of the last decade. Howeer, is freeware, and does proide the basic capabilies needed by the entry leel analyst. William Greene, New York, Febrary 1, 009

Cross Section Data Models Base model () y= β x+ where = U, U N(0, )and N(0, ) Cross Section Formlations Behaioral Assmptions maximizing (e.g., prodction) minimizing (e.g., cost) Distribtional Variations Normal exponential parameter = λ Normal gamma, parameters = λ,p Normal - trncated normal Assmptions abot mean of (inefficiency term) E[] = 0 () E[] = μ (N-trncated N wh constant mean) E[] = μ i = α z i (N-trncated N wh heterogeneos mean) = α z + w (w trncated N sch that 0 or 0) Variance of ar[] = (homoskedasticy) ar[] = i = exp( γ z i ) (heteroskedasticy) Scaling in Exponential (and Gamma) λ = exp(δ w) Variance of ar[] = (homoskedasticy) ar[] = = exp( δ w) (heteroskedasticy) Dobly Heteroskedastic ar[] = i = exp( γ z i ) and ar[] = = exp( δ w) Dobly Heteroscedastic and Nonzero Trncation E[] = μ i = α z i Other Reqires all data be in natral logarhms Confidence interals (note 1)

Panel Data Models Random Effects Base model () y = β x + i where i = N(0, ) Panel Data Formlations Random Effects Formlations ( - i : note time inariant) Behaioral Assmptions maximizing (e.g., prodction) minimizing (e.g., cost) Alarez-Amsler Scaling Model Distribtional Variations Normal - trncated normal Assmptions abot mean of (inefficiency term) E[] = 0 () E[] = μ (N-trncated N wh constant mean) E[] = μ i = α z i (N-trncated N wh heterogeneos mean) Other Battese-Coelli (199, 1995) model (note ) Reqires all data be in natral logarhms Confidence interals (note 1) Time-inariant inefficiency terms Time-arying inefficiency terms (note 3 & note 4)

Panel Data Models Fixed Effects Base model (Normal half-normal) (note 5) Unobsered heterogeney enters intercept α i (note i time inariant) y = αi + β x + i where = N(0, ) i Panel Data Formlations Fixed Effects Formlations (α i contains nobsered heterogeney; i : note time inariant) Behaioral Assmptions maximizing (e.g., prodction) minimizing (e.g., cost) Distribtional Variations Normal - trncated normal NOTE: LIMDEP fs seeral kinds of fixed effects models wh +/- AND a fixed effect in addion. Addional fixed effects may appear in the main eqation, in the mean of the trncated normal or in the ariance of the trncated normal (or any two of the three). Assmptions abot mean of (inefficiency term) E[] = 0 () E[] = μ (N-trncated N wh constant mean) E[] = μ i = α z i (N-trncated N wh heterogeneos mean)

3. Unobsered heterogeney enters mean of (inefficiency term) (note time arying) y = β x + where i = N( μi, ) Assmptions abot mean of (inefficiency term) E[] = 0 () μ i = α i + μ (N-trncated N wh constant mean) μ i = α i + α z i (N-trncated N wh dobly heterogeneos mean) Panel Data Models: Fixed Effects model (cont.) 4. Unobsered heterogeney enters inefficiency term ariance (note time arying) y = β x + where i = N(0, i) Assmptions abot mean of (inefficiency term) E[] = 0 () i = α i + μ (N-trncated N wh constant mean) (see aboe) i = α i + α z i (N-trncated N wh dobly heterogeneos mean) (see aboe) Variance of ar[] = = exp( αi + δ z )

Random Parameters (Random Effects) Formlation y = β x + i i where = N = (0, ) N μ (, ) μ = δ z i = exp( γ w ) i β (note: ) Behaioral Assmptions maximizing (e.g., prodction) minimizing (e.g., cost) Distribtional Variations Normal - trncated normal Assmptions abot mean of (inefficiency term) E[] = 0 () E[] = μ (N-trncated N wh constant mean) E[] = μ = δ ι z (N-trncated N wh heterogeneos mean) Random Parameters (Random Effects) Formlation (cont.) Variance of ar[] = (homoskedasticy) ar[] = i = exp( γ z i ) (firmwise heteroskedasticy) ar[] = t = exp( γ z t ) (timewise heteroskedasticy) ar[] = = exp( γ z ) (firmwise/ timewise heteroskedasticy)

Latent Class Formlation y j= β x + (note: β Jclasses) j j where = (0, j ) j N i = (0, j) j N Behaioral Assmptions maximizing (e.g., prodction) minimizing (e.g., cost) Distribtional Variations Normal - trncated normal Assmptions abot mean of (inefficiency term) E[] = 0 () E[] = μ (N-trncated N wh constant mean) E[] = μ = δ ι z (N-trncated N wh heterogeneos mean) Variance of ar[] = (homoskedasticy) ar[] = i = exp( γ ) (firmwise heteroskedasticy) ar[] = ar[] = t = = z i exp( γ ) (timewise heteroskedasticy) z t exp( γ ) (firmwise/ timewise heteroskedasticy) z Notes 1 Horrace & Schmidt (1996) contains formlas for calclating the correct CIs in the stochastic frontier model. I hae wrten LIMDEP commands to calclate those H & S CIs. The Battese-Coelli (1995) model concrrently estimates the parameters of the stochastic frontier model and the coefficients of a model that relates selected determinants of inefficiency ( z ariables) to the inefficiency estimates. 3 : It estimates the Battese-Coelli (199) model in which all firms series of inefficiency estimates follow the same time path. 4 LIMDEP: I hae wrten LIMDEP commands to allow each firm s series of inefficiency estimates to (potentially) follow s own niqe time path.