INTERACTING BOSE GAS AND QUANTUM DEPLETION

Similar documents
Interaction between atoms

arxiv:cond-mat/ v1 [cond-mat.stat-mech] 2 Aug 2004

Reference for most of this talk:

We can then linearize the Heisenberg equation for in the small quantity obtaining a set of linear coupled equations for and :

Superfluid 3 He. Miguel A. Morales

The Gross-Pitaevskii Equation and the Hydrodynamic Expansion of BECs

Monte Carlo Simulation of Bose Einstein Condensation in Traps

ICAP Summer School, Paris, Three lectures on quantum gases. Wolfgang Ketterle, MIT

Bose-Einstein Condensation

The Gross-Pitaevskii Equation A Non-Linear Schrödinger Equation

Harvard University Physics 284 Spring 2018 Strongly correlated systems in atomic and condensed matter physics

Landau damping of transverse quadrupole oscillations of an elongated Bose-Einstein condensate

Strongly correlated systems in atomic and condensed matter physics. Lecture notes for Physics 284 by Eugene Demler Harvard University

Landau Theory of Fermi Liquids : Equilibrium Properties

5. Gross-Pitaevskii theory

BCS-BEC Crossover. Hauptseminar: Physik der kalten Gase Robin Wanke

The Gross-Pitaevskii Equation and the Hydrodynamic Expansion of BECs

Quantum Monte Carlo Simulations of Exciton Condensates

CRITICAL TEMPERATURE AND CONDENSATE FRACTION OF A BOSE EINSTEIN CONDENSATE TRAPPED IN A FINITE VOLUME

Fermi-Bose and Bose-Bose K-Rb Quantum Degenerate Mixtures

Shock waves in the unitary Fermi gas

Introduction to Bose-Einstein condensation 4. STRONGLY INTERACTING ATOMIC FERMI GASES

2 Canonical quantization

Bogoliubov theory of the weakly interacting Bose gas

Ultracold Fermi and Bose Gases and Spinless Bose Charged Sound Particles

Bogoliubov theory of disordered Bose-Einstein condensates

Effects of spin-orbit coupling on the BKT transition and the vortexantivortex structure in 2D Fermi Gases

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking in Bose-Einstein Condensates

Lecture notes for QFT I (662)

16. GAUGE THEORY AND THE CREATION OF PHOTONS

The XY model, the Bose Einstein Condensation and Superfluidity in 2d (I)

Roton Mode in Dipolar Bose-Einstein Condensates

From BEC to BCS. Molecular BECs and Fermionic Condensates of Cooper Pairs. Preseminar Extreme Matter Institute EMMI. and

Excitations and dynamics of a two-component Bose-Einstein condensate in 1D

Supplementary Figure 3: Interaction effects in the proposed state preparation with Bloch oscillations. The numerical results are obtained by

arxiv:cond-mat/ v1 [cond-mat.stat-mech] 24 Jul 2001

PHYS3113, 3d year Statistical Mechanics Tutorial problems. Tutorial 1, Microcanonical, Canonical and Grand Canonical Distributions

When superfluids are a drag

Quantum Mechanics: Fundamentals

BCS Pairing Dynamics. ShengQuan Zhou. Dec.10, 2006, Physics Department, University of Illinois

Workshop on Coherent Phenomena in Disordered Optical Systems May 2014

Dynamic properties of interacting bosons and magnons

Lecture 6. Fermion Pairing. WS2010/11: Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics

in-medium pair wave functions the Cooper pair wave function the superconducting order parameter anomalous averages of the field operators

arxiv:cond-mat/ v1 13 Mar 1998

High-Temperature Superfluidity

Attempts at relativistic QM

Structure and stability of trapped atomic boson-fermion mixtures

Fundamentals and New Frontiers of Bose Einstein Condensation

Bose-Einstein Condensate: A New state of matter

Dipolar Interactions and Rotons in Atomic Quantum Gases. Falk Wächtler. Workshop of the RTG March 13., 2014

1 Fluctuations of the number of particles in a Bose-Einstein condensate

Bose-Einstein condensation of lithium molecules and studies of a strongly interacting Fermi gas

Introduction to Cold Atoms and Bose-Einstein Condensation. Randy Hulet

Lecture 2: Weak Interactions and BEC

MANY-BODY EFFECTS IN BOSE-EINSTEIN CONDENSATES OF DILUTE ATOMIC GASES BRETT DANIEL ESRY. B.S., Kansas State University, 1993

CRITICAL ATOM NUMBER OF A HARMONICALLY TRAPPED 87 Rb BOSE GAS AT DIFFERENT TEMPERATURES

Many-Body Problems and Quantum Field Theory

Vortices in Atomic Bose-Einstein Condensates in the large gas parameter region. Abstract

Publication II American Physical Society. Reprinted with permission.

Enhancing Superconductivity by Disorder

Lecture 5. Hartree-Fock Theory. WS2010/11: Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics

Bose-Einstein condensation in trapped bosons: A variational Monte Carlo analysis

Interferencing intensity in two Bose Einstein condensates with Josephson-like coupling

PRINCIPLES OF PHYSICS. \Hp. Ni Jun TSINGHUA. Physics. From Quantum Field Theory. to Classical Mechanics. World Scientific. Vol.2. Report and Review in

1 Bose condensation and Phase Rigidity

Non-equilibrium time evolution of bosons from the functional renormalization group

The general solution of Schrödinger equation in three dimensions (if V does not depend on time) are solutions of time-independent Schrödinger equation

Condensate fraction for a polarized three-dimensional Fermi gas

Many-Body Anderson Localization in Disordered Bose Gases

Numerical simulation of Bose-Einstein Condensates based on Gross-Pitaevskii Equations

Non-equilibrium Dynamics in Ultracold Fermionic and Bosonic Gases

Theory Seminar Uni Marburg. Bose-Einstein Condensation and correlations in magnon systems

Lecture 6 Scattering theory Partial Wave Analysis. SS2011: Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics, Part 2 2

Bose Gases, Bose Einstein Condensation, and the Bogoliubov Approximation

Sommerfeld-Drude model. Ground state of ideal electron gas

arxiv:cond-mat/ v1 2 Apr 1997

ψ s a ˆn a s b ˆn b ψ Hint: Because the state is spherically symmetric the answer can depend only on the angle between the two directions.

Supersymmetry breaking and Nambu-Goldstone fermions in lattice models

84 Quantum Theory of Many-Particle Systems ics [Landau and Lifshitz (198)] then yields the thermodynamic potential so that one can rewrite the statist

Bose-Einstein condensation: static and dynamical aspects

Many-body physics 2: Homework 8

The general solution of Schrödinger equation in three dimensions (if V does not depend on time) are solutions of time-independent Schrödinger equation

Physics 127b: Statistical Mechanics. Lecture 2: Dense Gas and the Liquid State. Mayer Cluster Expansion

The running of couplings and anomalous thermodynamics in Bose gases near resonance

2D Bose and Non-Fermi Liquid Metals

BEC in one dimension

Phonon II Thermal Properties

Spacetime analogue of Bose-Einstein condensates

Atomic Structure. Chapter 8

Durham E-Theses. Semi-Analytic Ground State Solutions of Two-Component Bose-Einstein Condensate in Two Dimensions SRIDHAR, SWATI

Pure Substance Properties and Equation of State

Second quantization: where quantization and particles come from?

Landau Bogolubov Energy Spectrum of Superconductors

Problem Set No. 3: Canonical Quantization Due Date: Wednesday October 19, 2018, 5:00 pm. 1 Spin waves in a quantum Heisenberg antiferromagnet

Classical field theory 2012 (NS-364B) Feynman propagator

Eigenmodes for coupled harmonic vibrations. Algebraic Method for Harmonic Oscillator.

arxiv: v1 [cond-mat.stat-mech] 30 Aug 2007

Andreas Kreisel. Institut für Theoretische Physik Johann Wolfgang Goethe Universität Frankfurt am Main. July,

Transcription:

922 INTERACTING BOSE GAS AND QUANTUM DEPLETION Chelagat, I., *Tanui, P.K., Khanna, K.M.,Tonui, J.K., Murunga G.S.W., Chelimo L.S.,Sirma K. K., Cheruiyot W.K. &Masinde F. W. Department of Physics, University of Eldoret, P.O. BOX 1125 30100, Kenya. *Author for correspondence ABSTRACT Quantum depletion is a consequence of strong interaction between particles (bosons) in the condensed state, also known as Zero Momentum State (ZMS). It occurs at T = 0 K. Due to quantum depletion, the particles leave the ZMS go to states above ZMS. This is different from thermal depletion which occurs at a finite temperature. The scattering between particles could be as a consequence of singlet interaction or the triplet interaction. The interspecies scattering length for such interactions have been obtained in the past we have used those values in the calculations for quantum depletion for a system of particles, both homogeneous heterogeneous. We have used the singlet triplet scattering length for Sodium Rubidium system. The results show that quantum depletion increases with increase in the scattering length for both singlet triplet interaction. Key words; Quantum Depletion, Singlet scattering length, Triplet scattering length. 1. INTRODUCTION The properties of an interacting Bose gas can be studied within the framework of quantum field theory. The model Hamiltonian can be diagonalized using Bogoliubov canonical transformation to get the energy dispersion relation which is used to study all the physical properties of the Bose gas. If the assembly is dilute, then most of the particles can occupy the Zero Momentum State(ZMS) in the limit that the temperature tends to be zero, only two body collisions with small momentum transfers play an important role, such collisions are characterized by a single parameter the s-wave scattering length. If, however, the assembly is a high density system, then more than two body collisions or multiple scattering can take place, such collisions are taken into account using the T-matrix formalism of the quantum field theory. Collisions can be characterized by the singlet (swave) scattering length, also triplet scattering length (co-efficient length). The interaction removes particles from the Zero Momentum condensate resulting in a finite probability of finding the particle with arbitrarily large momentum. This process by which the particles leave the ZMS due to interaction among the particles in the ZMS is called quantum depletion, or in general depletion. A number of experimentshave been done to observe BEC in dilute gases of Rubidium [1 4], Sodium [5, 6], Lithium [7], mixtures of any two Bose gases. The scattering lengths of homogeneous [8-10] heterogeneous 11-20 gases have also been observed experimentally. Since interactions in BEC or ZMS lead to depletion, the concerned theory for the depletion coefficient,, must be related to the scattering length,. This has to be done by writing the interaction Hamiltonian using the theory of second quantization, the many-body theory has been used to correlate depletion with the scattering length. Knowing the experimental values of the scattering length, the values of have been calculated for different types of bosons assemblies. 2. THEORETICAL EQUATIONS For a weakly interacting quantum liquid, or a weakly (interacting) non-ideal gas, i.e., an assembly in which the role of interactions between the particles is relatively small, the scattering amplitude of the particles will be small compared to the average wavelength, the magnitude of for a degenerate gas is of the same order of magnitude as the average distance between the particles. Because of the smallness of momentum of the colliding particles, to a first approximation, only s-wave scattering will be of importance. If the amplitude of the s-wave scattering is denoted by, the amplitude of the p-wave scattering is of the order. This is understood by considering the range of forces. If the range of forces is characterized by, then according to quantum mechanics, for, the scattering amplitudes for different angular momenta will be of

923 the order of, for the p-wave scattering, hence the result. The s-wave scattering contributes the terms of order higher to the total energy, whereas the p-wave scattering contributes the terms of order higher to the energy. Up to the term of the first order, the scattering can be regarded as anisotropic. Now if we assume that the interaction between the particles of a Bose gas is repulsive, then the scattering length (amplitude) is positive, at low temperatures, the Bose gas cannot stay dilute this is true even for infinitesimal attractive forces. We now calculate the energy of the ground state the energy spectrum for dilute Bose gas at. The model Hamiltonian will consist of a kinetic energy term a potential energy (interaction energy) such that, Such that, scattering length,. To underst the special role of ZMS ( ), we can replace the operators (operators for ZMS) by C numbers, i.e., The term of the interaction Hamiltonian classified according to the number of times can be appears in, we retain only the terms of order such that, Where the prime on the summation means that the terms are omitted from the summation. Eq. (6) gives the truncated Hamiltonian in which the excitations of particles out of the condensate are neglected. This will be a good approximation as long as. Substituting for into eq. (6), we get, And the number operator becomes, ) is the annihilation is the creation operator, where is the pseudo-potential (interaction potential between a pair of particles) which has been brought out in front of the summation sign, since the interaction between a pair of particles is identical, the scattering length,, does not depend on the angle in the s-wave scattering. The constant matrix element (of ) can be determined by requiring that correctly reproduce the two body scattering properties in a vacuum. In this case the Fourier transform gives such that, Where is the scattering coefficient for a hard sphere of radius. Eq. (5) shows that the parameter of has now been related to observable quantity, such as the where is the number of particles in the ZMS the second terms refer to the particles in the states above. Substituting for from eq. (8) in eq. (7), then substituting in eq. (1) for the Hamiltonian of the interacting bosons we get, Where the particle number density. In obtaining eq. (9), terms like have been neglected on the assumption that. Now since eq. (9) is in a quadratic form in the operators, it can be diagonalized with a canonical transformation to get the energy spectrum or the dispersion relation for the energy. Now the diagonalization of can be carried out with a canonical transformation by defining a new set of creation annihilation operators this transformation is called Bogoliubov transformation 21. This is written as,

924 where the coefficient of transformation are assumed to be real spherically symmetric. The transformation is said to be canonical if the new the old operators obey the same commutation laws such that, From eq. (10) we can obtain the values of in terms of, substitute the values of in eq. (11), for the transformations to be canonical, when the new the old operator obey the same commutation laws, it will be seen that the must satisfy the condition, Combining eqn. (13) (14) we get, In eq. (15), the left h side lies in between -1 1, hence this equation can be solved for all values of k only if the potential g is positive which means that the potential must be repulsive. Now, Between eq. (14) (16), we can write, For all each value of k, substituting for the eq. (10) in eq. (9) gives, from If we write Then we get, Using eq. (12), (14) (15) in eq. (13), we get The last term in eq.(13) is non-diagonal, to diagonalize H, this term has to be put equal to zero. Doing this will lead to the condition on the parameters. Hence we get, since the operators are not zero, its coefficient is zero, i.e. substituting for from eq. (12) in eq. (11) gives, Here the operator can have eigen values 0,1,2,.., consequently the ground state of the Hamiltonian H in eq. (20) is determined by the condition, And the state may be interpreted as quasi-particle vacuum. It should be understood that the state is a complicated combination of unperturbed eigen states. We can now write, since Now eqn. (12) will be satisfied if we write the parameters as,

925 or Since Since neither nor annihilates the ground state energy, E is now given by, Differentiating both sides of eqn. (25) we get, After diagonalization of Hamiltonian H given by eq. (9) using Bogoliubov transformation, we get an assembly of quasi-particles that do not interact are bosons. All excited state correspond to various numbers of noninteracting bosons, each with an excitation energy. Substituting for the values of get, in eqn. (26) we Now the distribution function in the ground state given by, is now can be written as, Now the interaction removes particles from the Zero Momentum State (ZMS), consequently there is a finite probability of finding a particle with an arbitrarily high momentum. Thus the depletion which can be written as Also And substituting in Eqn. (24) we get, The value of assumptions; or is calculated by making the following Eqn. (29) gives in terms of, it is this equation that will be used to do the required calculations to draw the variation of against. 3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS Figure 1 2 below show the variation of quantum depletion with singlet scattering length variation of quantum depletion with triplet scattering length, respectively.

926 30 25 Quantum Depletion η (10-10 ) 20 15 10 5 0 0 50 100 150 200 Singlet Scattering Length a (10-10 cm) interaction refers to the singlet scattering length compared to triplet scattering length, which means singlet scattering length corresponds to stronger interaction. Such results have been obtained by others [11,12]. 4. CONCLUSIONS We have obtained an equation between the scattering length quantum depletion. We can also obtain the equation relating scattering length inter-particle potential V(r).The results show that quantum depletion increases with increase in the scattering length for both singlet triplet interaction. Figure 1: Variation of quantum depletion with singlet scattering length Figure 2: Variation of quantum depletion with triplet scattering length Figure 1 2 above show that for both singlet triplet scattering lengths, the quantum depletion increases as the scattering length increases. Large scattering length means stronger interaction, stronger interaction leads to increase in quantum depletion. This is the result of our calculation. As the temperatures decrease, the scattering length decreases. This leads to decrease in fractional depletion. Smaller scattering length means weak interactions since the fractional depletion decreases as the scattering length decreases, this also means that weak interaction means reduction in depletion. The interaction is large when the REFERENCES [1] Inguscio M, Stringari S, Wieman C, Bose- Einstein Condensation in Atomic Gases, (Proceedings of the International School of Physics Enrico Fermi, IOS Press, Amsterdam), 1999. [2] K Mølmer,PhysRevLett80,(1998)1804 [3] DalfovoF, GiorginiS, StringariS, PitaevskiiLP,Rev Mod Phys 71, (1999) 463. [4] Butts D A Rokhsar D S,Phys Rev A 55, (1997) 4346. [5] Roati G, Quantum Degenerate Potassium- Rubidium Mixtures, Ph D Thesis, University of Trento, 2002. [6] Pitaevskii L Stringari S, Bose- Einstein Condensation, (Oxford Science Publications Int. Series of Monographs on Physics), 2003. [7] Pethick C J Smith H, Bose-Einstein condensation in dilute Gases, (Cambridge University Press), 2001. [8] De Marco B Jin D S,Science 285, (1999)1703. [9] GranadeS R, GehmM E, O Hara K M Thomas J E,Phys Rev Lett88, (2002)120405. [10] Schreck F, KhaykovichL, Corwin K L, et al,phys Rev Lett87, (2001)080403. [11] Gaul C Muller C A, new journal of physics, 14 (2012) 075025 [12] Cherry F Solomon C cond-mat-gas arxiv:1611.06871vhi (2016)