IT Solutions for Renewables Energy Forecasting Customers: Analysing end users requirements Dec 3rd, 2013 Carlos Alberto Castaño, PhD Head of R&D carlos.castano@gnarum.com
I. Who we are II. Customers Profiles III. Improving forecasts for trading IV. Conclusions
I. Who we are 3
I. Who we are The name GNARUM is derived from the Latin word gnarum which means I knew it. GNARUM was born out of Gnera Group s desire to satisfy the IT demands of renewable energy companies operating in the electricity market. GNARUM is committed to exceptional customer service. GNARUM s foundation is formed through Gnera Group s vast experience. All the knowledge and know-how possessed by Gnera Group has been used and expanded upon for every project developed by GNARUM. 4
I. Who we are International Experience - Experienced with multiple renewable technologies - Solid know-how backed by 10 years of experience operating in electricity markets with a high concentration of renewable technologies. - More than 400 plants and 1,200 MW currently managed - More than 2.5 TWh forecasted energy in 2012-24x7x365 Monitoring Center 5
II. Customers Profiles 6
II. Customers Profiles Forecasting Horizon Time Scales: Forecast horizon Nowcasting Seconds to minutes ahead Short-term prediction Up to 96-120 hours ahead Medium-long term prediction Several days ahead up to 2 weeks Forecasting Time Resolution: 5 min, 15 min, hourly, daily, monthly Now 7
II. Customers Profiles Resource/Generation Analysis Customers: Required for decision making Long-term simulation Monthly/Yearly averages On-site Data availability: poor Predictability higher Statistical characterization Error tolerance higher High computation time consuming Applications Wind farm siting Bilateral contracts evaluation 8
II. Customers Profiles O&M Customers: Short-term operation Accuracy is important Up to 6-10 hours ahead 5 to 10 min time resolution Real-Time data availability Computation time limited to minutes Update cycle: high Ramp events forecasts 9
II. Customers Profiles Market Operations: Day-Ahead management Revenues and penalties depend on accuracy From 6 to 48 hours ahead 15-min or Hourly time resolution Update cycle: several times/day Forecast driven by NWP Managing uncertainties 10
III. Improving forecasts for trading 11
III. Improving forecasts for trading Spanish FIT System GRID OPERATOR AND UTILITIES Energy Flow Energy Flow GENERATION SIDE Deviation Costs GRID OPERATOR Deviation Costs DEMAND SIDE Pool Costs MARKET OPERATOR Pool Costs Primes National Energy Council Distribution Fees Utilities 12
III. Improving forecasts for trading 13
III. Improving forecasts for trading Day ahead Market: Daily session with forecasted energy for the next day. H 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 Punto 13 de 14 corte 15 determina 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 la energía. Precio de la última oferta de venta casada c /kwh Ofertas de Venta Precio Marginal Ofertas de Compra Energía Casada MWh ENERGY GENERATION CONTEXT IN SPAIN. Market 14
III. Improving forecasts for trading Intra-day Market: Several sessions a day to adjust the energy sales ENERGY GENERATION CONTEXT IN SPAIN. Market 15
AÑO H1 H2 H3 H4 H5 H6 H7 H8 H9 H10 H11 H12 H13 H14 H15 H16 H17 H18 H19 H20 H21 H22 H23 /MWh III. Improving forecasts for trading Imbalancing penalties 25.00 20.00 15.00 10.00 5.00 0.00 Hourly Averaged Price 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Costs = P x D P = Imbalancing price D = Deviation Average cost 15 /MWh Imbalancing penalties are directly proportional to the inaccuracy or deviation. 16
III. Improving forecasts for trading Reduction of Imbalancing Penalties The Portfolio Effect (EC) is the result of damping. It is the net deviation of a set of renewable plants. Single Unit Deviations EC = D Portfolio Deviation Cost Asymmetry only penalizes deviations in one direction, relative to the needs of the electric system. System Need Deviation Cost 1 0 2 Full Cost 3 Full Cost 4 0 17
III. Improving forecasts for trading Weather Intelligence System for Energy April to September 2012: Nameplate Capacity Costs w/o Forecasting Costs w/ Forecasting & Portfolio Costs Managing Uncertainties Savings Wind 140 MW 0.86 M 0.26 M 0.20 M 0.66 M PV 513 MW 4.05 M 0.48 M 0.40 M 3.65 M Hydro 125 MW 0.6 M 0.05 M 0.04 M 0.56 M TOTAL 778 MW 5.51 M 0.79 M 0.64 M 4.87 M 18
III. Improving forecasts for trading 19
IV. Conclusions 20
IV. Conclusions Forecasting is a valuable source of information Different applications and problems Different strategies to compute the forecast Different customers for each solution Forecasts adapted to your problem Extra information can be used to improve the forecasts IT systems are helpful Managing uncertainties, interesting profit for trading 21
www.gnarum.com carlos.castano@gnarum.com 22