FIFTH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON SOUND AND VIBRATION DECEMBER 15-18, 1997 ADELAIDE, SOUTH AUSTRALIA

Similar documents
Modelling of sound elds in enclosed spaces with absorbent room surfaces. Part I: performance spaces

Noise in enclosed spaces. Phil Joseph

inter.noise 2000 The 29th International Congress and Exhibition on Noise Control Engineering August 2000, Nice, FRANCE

SIMPLE APPLICATION OF STI-METHOD IN PREDICTING SPEECH TRANSMISSION IN CLASSROOMS. Jukka Keränen, Petra Larm, Valtteri Hongisto

Test Report. RI Acoustic Lab. Measurement of Sound Absorption Coefficient for RockDelta NoiStop Noise Barrier. 20 Feb. 07

Development of a small-scale reverberation room

MEASUREMENTS OF SOUND ABSORPTION TIMBERCRETE

Answer - SAQ 1. The intensity, I, is given by: Back

Acoustic design of lightweight cabin walls for cruise ships

REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF SOUND ABSORPTION COEFFICIENTS OF WOVEN IMAGE ECHO PANEL 7MM TESTED WITH A 20MM AIR GAP IN A REVERBERATION ROOM.

Users Manual. Marshall Day Acoustics. Double Panels Contact 33 Details Marshall Day 37.8 Acoustics PO Box

DELTA Test Report. DANAK TEST Reg. no Measurement of Sound Absorption Coefficient for Kvadrat Soft Cells Wall Panel Type Time

Some issues in measurement of the random-incidence scattering coefficients in a reverberation room

LABORATORY MEASUREMENTS OF THE SOUND ABSORPTION OF CLASSICTONE 700 ASTM C Type E Mounting. Test Number 2

LABORATORY MEASUREMENTS OF THE SOUND ABSORPTION COEFFICIENTS OF OSCAR EVO-PANELS

The practical application of G and C 50 in classrooms

Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics

Directional distribution of acoustic energy density incident to a surface under reverberant condition

Visualizations of sound energy across coupled rooms using a diffusion equation model

REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF SOUND ABSORPTION COEFFICIENTS OF WOVEN IMAGE ECHO PANEL 24MM TESTED WITH NO AIR GAP MEASURED IN A REVERBERATION ROOM.

Sound Field Analysis of Monumental Structures by Application of Diffusion Equation Model

Engineering Noise Control

Acoustic response in non-diffuse rooms

REVERBERATION TIME, STRENGTH & CLARITY IN SCHOOL HALLS: MEASUREMENTS AND MODELLING

Consultancy Report Ref: 9383-R01

DELTA Test Report. Measurement of sound absorption coefficient for 15 mm Fraster felt Plus acoustic panels with mounting depth 45 mm

ROOM ACOUSTICS THREE APPROACHES 1. GEOMETRIC RAY TRACING SOUND DISTRIBUTION

Testing Procedure: AS ISO

EFFECTS OF PERMEABILITY ON SOUND ABSORPTION AND SOUND INSULATION PERFORMANCE OF ACOUSTIC CEILING PANELS

Experimental and numerical studies on reverberation characteristics in a rectangular room with unevenly distributed absorbers

Technical Report. Project. The Laboratory Determination of The Random Incidence sound Absorption Coefficient of VertiQ Panels.

ISO 354 INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Acoustics Measurement of sound absorption in a reverberation room

SOUND ABSORPTION OF SLAT STRUCTURES FOR PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS

Using an ambisonic microphone for measurement of the diffuse state in a reverberant room

Analytical and experimental study of single frame double wall

Measurement of sound absorption coefficient for Fraster felt SpaceCover

Accuracy of speech transmission index predictions based on the reverberation time and signal-to-noise ratio Galbrun, Laurent; Kitapci, Kivanc

The effect of an edge on the measured scattering coefficients in a reverberation chamber based on ISO

Technical Brief 003 Report on the Measurement of Sound Absorption of Planex Linea Storage Units

Modified wave equation for modelling diffuse sound field

unit 4 acoustics & ultrasonics

EXPERIMENTAL VERIFICATION OF THE EUROPEAN METHODOLOGY FOR TESTING NOISE BARRIERS IN SITU: SOUND REFLECTION

The diagram below. to the by the. outlet into. calculation. Since TRANSMISSION VIA STRUCTURE. Vibration Via Supports Duct Breakout

DELTA Test Report. Measurement of Sound Absorption for AqFlex ON, one Sample as a discrete Object. Performed for Flex Acoustics

DIFFUSIVITY AND ITS SIGNIFICANCE TO EFFECTIVE SEAT ABSORPTION IN CONCERT HALLS

LABORATORY MEASUREMENT OF SOUND ABSORPTION OF SONOGLASS SPRAY-ON TREATMENT IN THREE CONFIGURATIONS

A NEW ALGORITHM FOR THE SIMULATION OF SOUND PROPAGATION IN SPATIAL ENCLOSURES

An integrated approach to Acoustics - sound propagation and the phenomena affecting it

Available online at ScienceDirect. Energy Procedia 78 (2015 ) th International Building Physics Conference, IBPC 2015

Laboratory and In Situ Sound Absorption Measurement under a Synthetized Diffuse Acoustic Field: a Case Study on Five Materials

ROOM RESONANCES USING WAVE BASED GEOMET- RICAL ACOUSTICS (WBGA)

COMPARISON OF THE METHODS TO CALIBRATE THE DIFFUSE FIELD SENSITIVITY OF LABORATORY STAND- ARD MICROPHONE

Last time: small acoustics

Basic Study on a Laboratory Measurement Method of the Normal-Incidence Scattering Coefficient

Modeling and simulation of windows with noise mitigation and natural ventilation

Measurement of Acoustic Properties of light weight concrete SL-Deck

RIVERBANK ACOUSTICAL LABORATORIES

FDTD analysis on the sound insulation performance of wall system with narrow gaps

Review Article Acoustic Predictions in Industrial Spaces Using a Diffusion Model

Numerical Model of the Insertion Loss Promoted by the Enclosure of a Sound Source

Loudspeaker Choice and Placement. D. G. Meyer School of Electrical & Computer Engineering

Witold MIKULSKI. Central Institute for Labour Protection National Research Institute Czerniakowska 16, Warszawa, Poland;

Chapter 2. Room acoustics

A L I O N Technical Center. Test Report. Port Coquitlam, British Columbia, Canada

Chapter 3 Room acoustics

Chalmers Publication Library

ROOM ACOUSTICS. Ball State Architecture ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS 1 Grondzik 1. Room Acoustics

THE ACOUSTIC IMPEDANCE MEASUREMNET SYSTEM USING TWO MICROPHONES

Laboratory for Acoustics. Determination of the sound absorption (reverberation room method) of Airpanel, manufacturer Texdecor

ACOUSTIC CLARITY AND AUDITORY ROOM SIZE PERCEPTION. Densil Cabrera 1. Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia

The Negative Coefficient of Bruel & Kjaer Green Paint

Variability in structure-borne flanking transmission at low and mid frequencies

CIRCO. Sound-attenuating transfer unit QUICK FACTS

Design and Acoustics Brought into Harmony

Krantz Components. Twist outlet DD-N... for ceiling installation. Air distribution systems

Paseo Recoletos, nº Madrid TEST REPORT

Sound radiation and transmission. Professor Phil Joseph. Departamento de Engenharia Mecânica

Calcul des coefficients d'absorption alpha sabine

Laboratory for Acoustics

Method of estimating the reverberant sound absorption coefficient of the absorbing structure composed of different plane porous materials

1817. Research of sound absorption characteristics for the periodically porous structure and its application in automobile

1. Introduction. 2. ISO 3745 and ISO standard comparison

IMPROVEMENT OF RECIPROCITY MEASUREMENTS IN ACOUSTICAL SOURCE STRENGTH

The influence of Boundary Conditions on Sound Insulation

Radiated sound power estimates of building elements by means of laser Doppler vibrometry

Physics 115 Lecture 20. Reflection and Reverberation March 9, 2018

Sound radiation and sound insulation

17. Investigation of loudspeaker cabinet vibration using reciprocity

The directivity of the forced radiation of sound from panels and openings including the shadow zone

Holistic Acoustic Absorber Design: from modelling and simulation to laboratory testing and practical realization. Toulson, R. and Cirstea, S.

Introduction to Acoustics Exercises

Laurence Wilmshurst, David Thompson. To cite this version: HAL Id: hal

Study of Wenger Audience Seating Chair Absorption. Ron Freiheit

Absorption boundary conditions for geometrical acoustics

ACOUSTIC INTRINSIC PERFORMANCES OF NOISE BARRIERS: ACCURACY OF IN SITU MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES

Acoustic spaces: comfort and social sustainability

Qualitative behaviour of L1 and L2 standard deviation in insulations measurements according to standard UNE EN ISO 140-4

Room acoustic modelling techniques: A comparison of a scale model and a computer model for a new opera theatre

Reciprocity as an Analysing Technique in Building Acoustics

A simple formula for insertion loss prediction of large acoustical enclosures using statistical energy analysis method

Transcription:

FIFTH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON SOUND AND VIBRATION DECEMBER 15-18, 1997 ADELAIDE, SOUTH AUSTRALIA COMPUTER PREDICTION OF SOUND PROPAGATION IN ENCLOSED SPACES USING A PRESSURE BASED MODEL. S. M. Dance and B. M. Shield The Acoustics Group, School of Engineering Systems and Design, South Bank University, London, UK. SE1 OAA. Email dimcesfihbu.ac.uk. ABSTIUiCT Previous researchers have all found abnormal sound fields in empty enclosed spaces. The sound appeared to propagate in such a way as to increase in level with increasing distance from the sound source, although it returned to its expected level at the farthest distances. These anomalies were caused by interference, which was dependent on phase shifts. A computer model, PHASE, was previously used to predict interference effects at two frequencies in two spaces. The model has been optimised, extended and modified to predict across the full frequency range efficiently. To validate the model sound levels in a chamber fitted with absorptive material on all surfaces, as measured by Hodgson, were predicted at both a low and a high frequency. In addition the overall sound levels were predicted in an empty factory space to illustrate the accuracy of the model for practical purposes. To this end the predictions of an intensity based model, CISM, were used as a comparison. INTRODUCTION In the past computer prediction models1>2>3have been based on an intensity method of simplifying the problem by assuming that the sound source is incoherent and hence interference effects do not occur as is usually the case. However, m~~ ~independent researchers have found abnormal sound fields in empty enclosed spaces Y>. lle sound appears to propagate in such a way as to increase in level with increasing distance from the sound source, although it returns to its correct level at the farthest distances. These independently measured anomalies were caused by interference effects which can destructively and constructively, dependent on phase shifts, decrease or increase the sound levels in a room.

A computer model, PHASE, previously used to predict interference effects in two configurations of a laboratory space has been optimised, extended and modified to predict efficiently in a fill range of frequencies 8. PHASE was used to predict the sound propagation in two spaces: a physical scale model of a chamber and a factory space. For comparison the predictions of CISM, an intensity based image-source model have been included 9. THE PHASE MODEL PHASE is based on the image-source method of modelling using the parallelepipeds implementation. The approximations used in the previous version of PHASE 8 have been removed at the expense of increased run-time. The approximations included grouping the frequencies into ranges of ten hertz and changing the phase relation by intervals of ten degrees. The removal of these approximations resulted in a greatly increased run-time; this was especially true when overall sound levels were predicted in linear db. However, the model is now capable of reflecting the fine detail of modal effects in rooms. The sound pressure level, L, for a single sound source and a single receiver point, is given by: +lol.[~]-10~f*&-$),wherei+j+k.. where f is the octave band mid-frequency, 6 is the phase difference between the direct and the reflected sound, c is the speed of sound in air, p is the density of air, W is the sound power of the source, r is the direct distance ffom the source to receiver, d is the actual distance travelled by the reflected sound wave, n is the reflection order and R is the reflection coefficient at the given frequency for the given sound path. The model can represent an empty parallelepipeds shaped space with individual absorption coefficients for each room surface. Only one directional sound source can be modelled, but any number of arbitrary positioned receivers can be represented. All predictions used an energy discontinuity of 99 /0 10,up to a limit of 42 reflections, due to the increased run-time. THE ENCLOSED SPACES Two types of space were measured in the investigation, across a wide frequency range: a physical scale model of a chamber measured in the full scale third-octave bands 200 Hz and 2 khz, 4 khz, 5 khz, 6.3 khz, 8 khz and 10 khz by Hodgson7; and an empty factory space measured by Jonesb in eight octave bands, 63 Hz to 8 khz, plus linear db. THE CHAMBER The test room was designed to be as diffuse as possible, with a cubic shape and a uniform distribution of absorption. The room was built to a scale of 1:2.5 with dimensions, 3.17 m,

2.60 mand l.95m. Alltheroom swfaces were constmcted ofdense concrete with l3.5m thick semi-rigid glass-fibre panels installed on each of the six surfaces. The absorption coefficients of the material were based on measurements in the chamber and calculated using the Eyring formula. The compact sound source was positioned in one corner of the room at a height of 1.05 m and measurements were taken at eight receivers positions at a height of 1.05 m, see Figure 1. b-----------,, /.-...-.----..-----... ~~ T!1.95m,ffv~,,/, /7 2.60m 4 ># 3.17m Figure 1. Source and receiver positions in a reverberation chamber THE FACTORY SPACE The empty factory was 56m long and 36m wide with a pitched roof of height 8.6m rising to 10.6m at the apex. The floor was concrete, the walls were brick and the roof was formed of galvanised steel backed on to mineral wool with a perforated steel lining. The absorption coefficients and hence the reflection coefficients for the building materials were obtained from standard texts. A single sound source, a Bruel and Kjaer type 4224, positioned in one corner of the space on the floor was used for the measurements, which were taken at a height of 1.5m along the length of the shop floor, see Figure 2... ~,,.~,.! -. -------:- 56m t 8.6m ~ ~ 36m Figure 2. Source and measurement positions in the factory space. THE PREDICTIONS For the absorptive chamber predictions only the 200 Hz and 4 khz results have been included for reasons of brevity. However, all the octave band results have been included for the factory space so that the practical application of the model can be clearly demonstrated. In addition to

PHASE, the CISM model was also used to predict the sound propagation in both spaces. All figures show the measured ( ), CISM ( - -)and PHASE (----) sound levels. THE CHAMBER PREDICTIONS Figures 3 and 4 show the measured and predicted sound levels at 200 Hz and 4 khz (full scale) in the absorptive chamber.. \ 110 I \.L \, *. % ------- N;, \/ >- 0.1 1 10 0.1 1 10 Distme fiomsource (@ Distance fi-omsource (m) Figure 3. Chamber sound levels at 200 Hz. Figure 4. Chamber sound levels at 4 khz. The measurements at the low frequency clearly demonstrate the interference effects in this small space, see Figure 3. PHASE predicted the shape of the sound propagation curve and the absolute sound level accurately for both the frequencies. However, CISM predicted the shape and level poorly, at the low frequency, except at the furthest receiver, but was accurate at the high frequency, see Figure 4. These results confirm that interference was the cause of the unusual sound propagation, which of course could not be predicted by a pure intensity model such as CISM. THE FACTORY SPACE PREDICTIONS The factory space was modelled using a simplified representation of the actual geometry of the space i.e. no pitched roof and no internal walls. However, the nearest room surfaces to the source are the most significant, and the total volume and proportions of the room were modelled accurately. The results for alternate octave bands, which are representative of all the octave bands predicted are presented together with the overall sound level in linear db, see Figures 5 to 9.

-10, -5, -12 -lo -14 4-16 -24-26 -28-15- -20- -25- -30- -30 ~ -35 ~ 1 10 100 1 10 100 Distance fi-omsource (m) Distance from Source (m) Figure 5. Factory SP, 63 Hz octave band. Figure 6. Factory SP, 250 Hz octave band -lo -12-14 -16-18 ~ w -20 % -22-24 -26-28 -30 1. 1,,,,, I, 1 10-5 1 I! -lo -20-25lL N ~ -30 100 \ e.. \ \\.,,. \.. 1 10 100 Distance from Source (m) Distancetim Soume (m). Figure 7. Factory SP, 1 khz octave band. Figure 8. Factory SP, 4 khz octave band. Table 1 shows the average prediction differences for the eight octave bands to demonstrate the overall prediction accuracy of PHASE compared to that of CISM. It can be clearly seen that PHASE is approximately as accurate as CISM with predictions within 2 db of those measured, except for 500 Hz where the sound power level was incorrectly determined from the measurements and hence the 4 db average error for both CISM and PHASE.

Table 1 Average Prediction Dl~ference (db) in the Factory Space. 4.6 1.5 1.0 1.4 1.5 [ 1.0 CISM 1.5 2.3 4.2 1.2 1.6 0.9 0.4 j 0.9 63 Hz Predictions. PHASE predicted the shape of the SP accurately, including the dip at 7 m from the sound source with a flattening of the curve beyond 10m, caused by the destructive interference of the direct and reflected sound from the two nearest surfaces. CISM predicted the sound levels accurately at the nearest and furthest receiver positions flom the sound source, Figure 5, but with a monotonic decrease giving an average prediction difference of 1.5 db, as compared to 2.0 db for PHASE. 250 Hz Predictions. The measured SP curve was more consistent for this octave band than for the lower frequencies and this was accurately predicted by PHASE, the CISM model again predicting a monotonic slope, Figure 6. The result was an average prediction difference of 0.9 db and 0.8 db for PHASE and CISM, respectively. 1 khz Predictions. The measured sound levels show that there was constructive interference occurring between 2 m and 7 m which was predicted as destructive interference by PHASE over precisely the same range. For the receivers beyond 7 m the relative sound levels were accurately predicted by PHASE, but with a 3 db offset, see Figure 7. CISM correctly predicted the gradient of the slope producing a 1.2 db average error compared to 1.5 db for PHASE. 4 ld+z Predictions. As for the 1 khz predictions PHASE predicted a destructive interference effect when a constructive interference effect was measured, from 8 m to 20 m, see Figure 8. CISM predicted a smoothed version of the measured SP curve and hence produced an average error of 0.9 db compared to 1.4 db for PHASE. -101-12 -14-16 ~ -18 g -20-22 -24-26 -28 I, 1 1 10 100 Distance from Source (m) Figure 9. Factory sound propagation in linear db.

Linear Predictions. CISM predicted the flattened SP slope in the factory, a classic imagesource prediction, see Figure 9. PHASE produced sound levels similar to those measured for all the receiver positions, giving an average error of 1.0 db compared to 0.9 db for CISM. The linear predictions were calculated by summing the sound levels for each receiver position in each octave band for PHASE. CISM used the standard approach of predicting the overall sound levels based on 500 Hz absorption coefficients and the measured overall sound power of the sound source with the appropriate directivity factors. Overall it was seen that the predictions were accurate across the octave bands. However, for the 1 khz octave band it was clear that PHASE was predicting a destructive interference effect at 2 m to 4 m when the measurements showed a constructive effect at the same distances from the sound source, resulting in an 8 db difference in predicted sound levels. This was repeated for the 4 khz octave band, but for distances in the range of 8 m to 30 m giving a predicted difference of up to 5 db. One possible explanation for the discrepancy in the predictions is that of the phase change on reflection. It has been assumed that there was no change on reflection, this appears not to be the case at these particular frequencies. In fact, the reverse seems to be true with destructive interference replacing constructive interference. Hence, an investigation could be performed where phase change on reflection was set to 180 and the sound propagation repredicted over the distance from the sound source of interest., SUMMARY The original PHASE model was refined to predict all the detail of the interference effects in a room, at the cost of execution time. In the very small reverberation room, a 1:2.5 physical scale model, both the low and high frequency ranges were accurately predicted in terms of shape and sound level. At the low frequency, 200 Hz, the interference effects were clearly predicted and at higher frequencies, 2 khz and above, the modal effects cancelled each other, which agreed with the measurements. These results confirm Hodgson s assumption that wave effects were preventing the monotonic decrease in the sound level with increasing distance for the low frequency measurements. The PHASE model demonstrated that pressure based modelling can be of practical use in industrial spaces both at predicting individual frequencies and the overall sound level, although, the advantages of predicting overall sound levels using pressure rather than intensity are limited and the costs high. However, the octave bands predictions did show interference effects, which were not modelled by the intensity based image-source model although it was seen that PHASE tended to predict destructive interference when constructive interference was actually occurring. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This research was fimded by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council of Great Britain. The authors would also like to thank Murray Hodgson for allowing the use of his data in this research project.

REFERENCES 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 G. R. Lemire and J. Nicolas. Image method prediction of industrial hall noise levels- A new algorithm. Noise Control Engineering Journal, 24(2), 1985 M. Vorlander. Simulation of the transient and steady-state sound propagation in rooms using a new combine ray-tracing/image-source algorithm. Journal of the Acoustical Society of Arneric% 86(l), 172-178,1989. A.M. Ondet and J. L. Barbry. Modelling of sound propagation in fitted workshops using ray tracing. The Acoustical Society of America, 85(2), 787-796, 1989 E. A. Lindqvist. Sound attenuation in factory spaces. Acustic~ 50,1982 T.L.Redmore. A method to predict the transmission of sound through corridors. Applied Acoustics, 15, 133-146, 1982. C. Jones. Development of a computer model for prediction of sound fields in factory spaces. South Bank Polytechnic, Ph.D. Thesis, 1990. M. Hodgson. Experimental evaluation of the accuracy of the Sabine and Eyring theones in the case of non-low surface absorption. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 94(2), Part 1,836-840, 1993. S. Dance, J. Roberts and B. Shield. Computer prediction of sound distribution in enclosed spaces using an interference pressure model. Applied Acoustics, 44, 53-65, 1995. S. Dance and B. Shield. The complete image-source method for the prediction of sound distribution in non-diffuse enclosed space. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 201(4), 473-489, 1997. 10 S. Dance. The development of computer models for the prediction of sound distribution in non-diffuse space. South Bank University, Ph.D Thesis, 1993.