Space- and Body-Fixed Coordinate Systems

Similar documents
Translation versus Momentum and Rotation versus Angular Momentum

Pauli Deformation APPENDIX Y

CHE3935. Lecture 2. Introduction to Quantum Mechanics

Particle in a 3 Dimensional Box just extending our model from 1D to 3D

Electronic structure, plane waves and pseudopotentials

Vector and Scalar Potentials

1 r b V = 1 r a2. r 1. r ij

2.4. Quantum Mechanical description of hydrogen atom

VALENCE Hilary Term 2018

1.6. Quantum mechanical description of the hydrogen atom

(Refer Slide Time: 1:20) (Refer Slide Time: 1:24 min)

Quantum Theory of Angular Momentum and Atomic Structure

Exercises : Questions

Appendix A. The Particle in a Box: A Demonstration of Quantum Mechanical Principles for a Simple, One-Dimensional, One-Electron Model System

Relativistic Quantum Mechanics

Applied Nuclear Physics (Fall 2006) Lecture 2 (9/11/06) Schrödinger Wave Equation

20 The Hydrogen Atom. Ze2 r R (20.1) H( r, R) = h2 2m 2 r h2 2M 2 R

Slowing down the neutrons

We start with some important background material in classical and quantum mechanics.

Lecture 10. Central potential

The Schrödinger Equation

Chem 467 Supplement to Lecture 19 Hydrogen Atom, Atomic Orbitals

Schrödinger equation for the nuclear potential

Ch120 - Study Guide 10

Quantum Mechanics: The Hydrogen Atom

2. The Schrödinger equation for one-particle problems. 5. Atoms and the periodic table of chemical elements

We do not derive F = ma; we conclude F = ma by induction from. a large series of observations. We use it as long as its predictions agree

The 3 dimensional Schrödinger Equation

Problem 1: Spin 1 2. particles (10 points)

Lagrange Multipliers Method

ONE AND MANY ELECTRON ATOMS Chapter 15

The Quantum Theory of Atoms and Molecules

Exam in TFY4205 Quantum Mechanics Saturday June 10, :00 13:00

Physics of Finite and Infinite Nuclear Systems Phys. 477 (542)

Section 10: Many Particle Quantum Mechanics Solutions

Quantum mechanics (QM) deals with systems on atomic scale level, whose behaviours cannot be described by classical mechanics.

Ch 125a Problem Set 1

MATH325 - QUANTUM MECHANICS - SOLUTION SHEET 11

Quantum Physics III (8.06) Spring 2007 FINAL EXAMINATION Monday May 21, 9:00 am You have 3 hours.

We now turn to our first quantum mechanical problems that represent real, as

SECOND QUANTIZATION PART I

If electrons moved in simple orbits, p and x could be determined, but this violates the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle.

Chemistry 432 Problem Set 4 Spring 2018 Solutions

Lecture 6. Tight-binding model

3. Quantum Mechanics in 3D

Class XII - Physics Atoms Chapter-wise Problems

129 Lecture Notes Relativistic Quantum Mechanics

Schrödinger equation for central potentials

Atomic Structure and Atomic Spectra

Chem 3502/4502 Physical Chemistry II (Quantum Mechanics) 3 Credits Spring Semester 2006 Christopher J. Cramer. Lecture 6, January 30, 2006

Introduction to Electronic Structure Theory

G : Quantum Mechanics II

Electrochemistry project, Chemistry Department, November Ab-initio Molecular Dynamics Simulation

Opinions on quantum mechanics. CHAPTER 6 Quantum Mechanics II. 6.1: The Schrödinger Wave Equation. Normalization and Probability

Quantum Chemistry I : CHEM 565

df(x) = h(x) dx Chemistry 4531 Mathematical Preliminaries Spring 2009 I. A Primer on Differential Equations Order of differential equation

( ) = 9φ 1, ( ) = 4φ 2.

1 The postulates of quantum mechanics

E = φ 1 A The dynamics of a particle with mass m and charge q is determined by the Hamiltonian

Population Analysis. Mulliken Population Analysis APPENDIX S

6. QED. Particle and Nuclear Physics. Dr. Tina Potter. Dr. Tina Potter 6. QED 1

Chapter 3: Relativistic Wave Equation

The Photoelectric Effect

PH 253 Final Exam: Solution

Chemistry 3502/4502. Exam I. February 6, ) Circle the correct answer on multiple-choice problems.

3.5 Finite Rotations in 3D Euclidean Space and Angular Momentum in QM

Physics 217 Problem Set 1 Due: Friday, Aug 29th, 2008

C/CS/Phys C191 Particle-in-a-box, Spin 10/02/08 Fall 2008 Lecture 11

Name Solutions to Test 3 November 7, 2018

23 The Born-Oppenheimer approximation, the Many Electron Hamiltonian and the molecular Schrödinger Equation M I

The Central Force Problem: Hydrogen Atom

Oh, the humanity! David J. Starling Penn State Hazleton PHYS 214

Atomic Units, Revisited

A short and personal introduction to the formalism of Quantum Mechanics

Relativistic Dynamics

Legendre Polynomials and Angular Momentum

Quantum Mechanics. p " The Uncertainty Principle places fundamental limits on our measurements :

3: Many electrons. Orbital symmetries. l =2 1. m l

PDEs in Spherical and Circular Coordinates

PY 351 Modern Physics - Lecture notes, 3

The quantum state as a vector

Lecture #5: Begin Quantum Mechanics: Free Particle and Particle in a 1D Box

Problems and Multiple Choice Questions

Problem Set 5: Solutions

Lecture 7. More dimensions

CHEM3023: Spins, Atoms and Molecules

Quantum Mechanics in Three Dimensions

Chapter 11. Special Relativity

Brief review of Quantum Mechanics (QM)

Preliminary Quantum Questions

Name Final Exam December 14, 2016

Many Body Quantum Mechanics

-state problems and an application to the free particle

arxiv: v1 [physics.gen-ph] 6 Jan 2014

Lecture 5 Scattering theory, Born Approximation. SS2011: Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics, Part 2 2

Physics 209 Fall 2002 Notes 5 Thomas Precession

ECE440 Nanoelectronics. Lecture 07 Atomic Orbitals

Lecture 4. The Bohr model of the atom. De Broglie theory. The Davisson-Germer experiment

Single Electron Atoms

Magnetism in low dimensions from first principles. Atomic magnetism. Gustav Bihlmayer. Gustav Bihlmayer

Transcription:

APPENDIX I Space- and Body-Fixed Coordinate Systems Space-Fixed Coordinate System SFCS) A planetoid or molecule) moves through empty space, and we are observing it from our inertial 1 ) spaceship. In order to carry out observations of the planetoid molecule), we have to install some gear on our spaceship and install a Cartesian coordinate system that will enable us to describe the planetoid whatever happens to it. This is the space-fixed coordinate system SFCS), whose orientation with respect to distant stars does not change with time. If the molecule does not interact with anything, then with respect to the SFCS see Chapter ), note the following: Itstotal energy remains invariant because of the homogeneity of time). Itstotal momentum remains invariant because of the homogeneity of space). Itstotal angular momentum vector remains invariant because of the isotropy of space). An observer on another spaceship inertial as well) will see the same phenomena in exactly the same way : the energy, momentum, and angular momentum also will be invariant, but in general, it will be different from what was measured in the first spaceship. Let us introduce in the SFCS the vectors r i = ) x i, y i, z i showing from the origin the particles from which our molecule is composed i.e., the electrons and the nuclei), i = 1,,...N. Then, using the SFCS, we write down the Hamiltonian of the system and the operators of the mechanical quantities we are interested in, we calculate all the wave functions we need, we compare them with spectra measured in the SFCS, etc. 1 That is, it is not rotating. We will convince ourselves that our SFCS is inertial by measuring how a pointlike mass assumed to not be interacting with the rest of the spaceship) moves. If it moves along a straight line with a constant velocity, then the SFCS is inertial. In a non-inertial coordinate system, the description of the physical phenomena in the molecule will be different. That is, in the non-relativistic approximation. The Doppler effect, with the change of the electromagnetic wave frequency due to the motion even uniform) of the emitting object, is seen in the experiment. The effect is of the relativistic character; i.e., it vanishes if we assume the infinite velocity of light. Ideas of Quantum Chemistry, Second Edition. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-444-59436-5.0009-5 014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. e93

e94 Appendix I Body-Fixed Coordinate System BFCS) One day, however, we may feel that we do not like the SFCS because it has too many variables. Of course, this is not a sin, but it does waste our forces. Indeed, since in all inertial systems we have the same physics, we can separate the motion of the center of mass 3 the total mass = i m i). The center of mass with position i R C = m ir i moves in the SFCS with a constant velocity along a straight line, which can be easily taken into account after the solution is obtained, and which in most cases is irrelevant. This is why we decide to introduce the Cartesian coordinates ) X C, Y C, Z C = RC in the hope that in the future, we will be able to get rid of them. Now, we need to introduce a coordinate system of the lacking 3N 3 variables) located in the molecule, the so-called body-fixed coordinate system BFCS). How should this be defined? Well, it should be a coordinate system that will define unambiguously any configuration of the particles in the molecule. There are many such coordinate systems. Here, you have some of the possibilities for the BFCS in all of them, their axes are parallel to the corresponding axes of the SFCS 4 ). We may choose one of the following sets 5 of position vectors: With R C, we locate the BFCS on any of the particles this is indicated by vector r 1 ), and the BFCS positions of the other particles are shown by r i = r i r 1 for i =, 3,...N. With R C, the vector R = r r 1 indicates particle from particle 1, and the remaining particles are shown by) the vectors that begin in the center of the section linking particles 1 and : r i = r r1 +r i for i = 3, 4,...N. With R C, all the vectors show the particles from the center of mass except particle 1): r i = r i R C for i =, 3,...N. The position vector of the particle 1 can be calculated from the coordinates already given. Center-of-ass Separation After writing the Hamiltonian Ĥ in the SFCS, and then introducing any of the above choices of the coordinate system, we obtain Ĥ = Ĥ C + Ĥ, where 3 The exact separation of the center of mass motion in SFCS, as well as the exact separation of rotation of the molecule which is not shown in this appendix) have been shown for the first time in R.T. Pack and J.O. Hirschfelder, J.Chem.Phys., 49, 4009 1968). 4 Only after introducing the axes of the coordinate system associated to the particles, and not with the SFCS, is separation of rotation possible. 5 Other are other choices are possible.

Space- and Body-Fixed Coordinate Systems e95 with any of the choices, the operator Ĥ is identical but the mathematical formula for Ĥ will be different because different coordinates are used. Thus, the total Hamiltonian in the SFCS is Ĥ = Ĥ C X C, Y C, Z C ) + Ĥr), where r symbolizes 6 all the other variables. The key result is that the two operators on the right side depend on different variables. The goal of the above changes of the coordinate system was to show that the Schrödinger equation written in the SFCS; i.e., Ĥ = E splits into two Schrödinger equations separation of variables ) as follows: Ĥ C ψ C = E C ψ C describes the motion of a free particle of mass and the coordinates X C, Y C, Z C the center-of-mass motion ), with ψ C = exp ip C R C ),wherep C stands for the total momentum of the system. Ĥψ = Eψ, where E = E + E C R C, r) = ψ C R C ) ψr). The proof is simple. Let us check that the product wave function satisfies the Schrödinger equation. The left side is Ĥ[ψ C R C ) ψr)] = Ĥ C [ψ C R C ) ψr)]+ĥ[ψ C R C ) ψr)] = ψr) Ĥ C ψ C R C ) + ψ C R C ) Ĥψr) = ψr) E C ψ C R C ) + ψ C R C ) Eψr) = ) E + E C [ψc R C ) ψr)] and this equals the right side E. Example 1. Center-of-ass Separation for the First Choice of the Coordinates We use the first choice of the coordinates for the system of two particles. In the SFCS, Ĥ = m 1 1 m + V. The new coordinates are i X C = m i x i, Y i C = m i y i, Z i C = m i z i, 6 For the sake of brevity. x = x x 1, y = y y 1, z = z z 1.

e96 Appendix I Then 7 x 1 = X C x 1 = X C + Y C x 1 Y C + Z C x 1 + 0 + 0 X C x + 0 + 0 = Z C + x x 1 x + y x 1 y + z x 1 z X C x, and similarly for y 1 and z 1.Further, x = X C x = m X C + Y C x Y C + Z C x + 0 + 0 + X C x + 0 + 0 = m Z C + x x x + y x y + z x z X C + x, and similarly for y and z. Hence, the kinetic energy operator after constructing the proper Laplacians from the above operators) is ˆT = 1 m = [ m1 ) X C ] + x X C x + similarly for y and z) + [ m ) m X C + x + m ] X C x + similarly for y and z) = C μ, where the reduced mass μ of the two particles: 1 μ = 1 + 1 m,and = x + y + z. 7 According to the mathematical analysis, we have to write down the contributions of all the differential operators u of the new coordinates u multiplied by their coupling constants u x with the coordinate x 1 1.

Space- and Body-Fixed Coordinate Systems e97 Our derivation is now over. The operator Ĥ has been found. It turned out to take the following form 8 note, that the new coordinates have to be introduced also in the potential energy V )of the form: Ĥ = μ + V. Example. Center-of-ass Separation for the Third Choice of the Coordinates Let us take again the same two particles, but this time use the third choice of the coordinate system: X C = Then, = X C + Y C x 1 x 1 X C x 1 = + 0 + 0 X C and similarly for y 1 and z 1.Further, x = X C x X C + Y C x i m i x i, Y i C = m i y i, Z i C = m i z i, x = x X C, y = y Y C, z = z Y C. + Z C Y C x 1 x + 0 + 0 = Y C + Z C x + x Z C x 1 x + y x 1 y + z x 1 z ), X C x Z C + x x x + y x y + z x z 8 The kinetic energy operator has a very interesting form. Particle 1 rests right in the origin of the BFCS x = 0, y = 0, z = 0), and therefore its kinetic energy operator is absent in Ĥ. There is the kinetic energy of particle, but its mass is equal to μ, not to m. The coordinates x, y, and z measured from the origin of the BFCS) correspond to particle. For example, for the hydrogen-like atom, if someone takes the nucleus as particle 1, and the electron as particle, then x, y,andz show the electron from the Cartesian coordinate system BFCS located on the nucleus. The potential energy operator V = Ze x ) + ) + ) = Ze x 1 y y 1 z z 1 x +y +z corresponds to the Coulombic interaction of the electron of charge e and the nucleus of the charge Ze. After separation of the center of mass, we are left with equation Ĥψ = Eψ. The electron of mass μ is described by the wave function ψ. In the ground state, ψ = 1 e x +y +z. This is the description of the hydrogen-like atom according to an π observer sitting at the nucleus. If another observer puts his armchair with the axes of the BFCS carved on it) at the electron, then he would see the hydrogen-like atom according to the electron. Since in V there are squares of x, y, andz, and in the kinetic energy operator, there are the second derivatives with respect to x, y, andz, then we would obtain the same wave function as before: ψ = 1 e x +y +z, where the particle moving with respect to the electron is the π nucleus, but with the mass equal to μ i.e., the same as before). By the way, this μ is almost equal to the mass of the electron. Thus, the two descriptions mean the same thing.

e98 Appendix I = m = m + 0 + 0 + 1 m X C + 1 m X C ) x = m ) x + 0 + 0 + X C and similarly for y and z. Thus, the kinetic energy operator takes the following form after inserting the squares of the corresponding operators): [ )] m1 ˆT = 1 = ) m XC + x X C x + similarly for y and z) [ ] m ) ) + m + m1 XC = C m1 ) xyz m1 m + m m m1 m ) xyz = C x, x + m X C x ) xyz m1 X C x +...= C m1 ) m1 xyz. m + similarly for y and z) ) ) X C x ) xyz It is seen that once again, we have reached the situation that allows us to separate the motion of the center of mass in the Schrödinger equation. This time, however, the form of the operator Ĥ is different e.g., xyz formally takes the same form as ), only because the variables are different the operator remains the same). Once again, this is the kinetic energy of a pointlike particle 9 with the coordinates x, y,andz defined in this example) and the mass is equal to m. 9 Let us first denote the nucleus as particle 1 and the electron as particle. Then R C shows almost the position of the nucleus, and x, y, andz are nearly the coordinates of the electron measured from the nucleus, while m m1 is almost equal to the mass of the electron. Thus, we have a situation that resembles Example 1. If the particles are chosen in the other way the electron is particle 1 and the nucleus is particle ), then the same physical situation looks completely different. The values of x, y, andz are very close to 0, while the mass of the effective pointlike particle becomes very large. Note that the new coordinates describe the potential energy in a more complex way. We need the differences of the kind x x 1, in order to insert them into the Pythagorean formula for the distance. We have x 1 = m X 1 +m C m m x = X 1 +m C m ) x + XC = XC m x, x 1 x = X C m x x X C = x 1 + m ). This gives immediately r stands for the electron-center of mass distance): V new ) = Ze 1+ m ). m r 1