Looking into the HPLC Column while Running CIP Imre SALLAY, PhD OSAKA SODA CO., LTD., Osaka, Japan imre@osaka-soda.co.jp
The big application - By far the biggest RP silica application is insulin purification. - Insulin is prone to self-aggregation and fibrillation - The fibrillated goo has to be removed from column, most commonly by NaOH wash
The problem with Insulin Insulin, insulin analogs and other diabetes treating drugs (GLP-1) are prone to selfaggregation, FIBRILLATION
Unprotected (un-bonded) silica melts at ph 13. Surface modification / bonding makes it last longer. But still CIP on silica??? Trouble begins with fragments falling off NaOH at ph 13 is hydrolyzing siloxane bonds in the silica matrix. First small chunks of silica start falling off ( fines ).
What we could not say so far was whether we cleaned the silica to death (over clean) or we did not clean it enough! We had no scientific tool to monitor CIP effect on time. The problem with silica With the chunks of broken off silica bonded ligands are lost. Problem with LEACHABLES. Silanol groups get exposed. Negatively charged silanol groups decreasing selectivity. Frequent NaOH wash kills the silica. Game over! Did we clean it to death???
Pyridine-phenol test (A model for basic impurities) -- VIRGIN -- after use Retention time of pyridine became longer. Silanol effect is increased due to ligand loss. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Sample : 1. Uracil, 2. Pyridine, 3. Phenol min
The problem with degregation Possible CIP agents: - Acetic acid or Formic acid - SDS (with special washing), EDTA if metal ions are sorbed - Urea, Ammoniumhydroxide, TRIS (to suppress hydrophobic interactions on high ph) - NaOH in combination with organic solvent (to fragment aggregates and to suppress hydrophobic interactions)
Evaluating current CIP protocols Simple protocol from literature: X CV 0.1 n NaOH aq./organic solvent 30/70 (ph 13) is pumped through the column followed by ph adjustment with acid. This step is implemented after every five number of purification cycles. - Is the NaOH concentration too low or too high? - Is the frequency adequate? - Does the silica get cleaned enough? - Do we over-clean the silica?
ratio to initial Effect of different NaOH concentration retention time for Naphthalene 1.00 0.90 0.80 0.70-15mM 25mM 100mM 250mM 0.60 0 200 400 600 800 1000 CV
Real, used silica sample analysis: Elemental analysis C% H% N% VIRGIN 8.6 1.8 0 TOP MIDDLE BOTTOM TOP 12.82 2.27 1.63 MIDDLE 8.43 1.77 0 BOTTOM 8.51 1.77 0
Real, used silica sample analysis: Chromatographic evaluation Aromatic standard uv(x10,000) 8.0 7.5 7.0 6.5 6.0 5.5 5.0 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2 VIRGIIN 4 1 TOP 3 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0-0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 min Mobile Phase : MeOH/H2O=60/40 Flow rate : 0.2mL/min Oven temp : 40ºC Detection : UV, 254 nm Sample : 1. Uracil 2. Methyl benzoate 3. Toluene 4. Naphthalene Basic standard uv(x100,000) 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 1 2 3 VIRGIN TOP Mobile Phase : MeOH/H2O=30/70 Flow rate : 0.2mL/min Oven temp : 40ºC Detection : UV, 254nm Sample : 1. Uracil 2. Pyridine 3. Phenol 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00 2.25 2.50 2.75 3.00 3.25 3.50 3.75 4.00 4.25 4.50 4.75 5.00 5.25 5.50 5.75 min
Real, used silica sample analysis: Chromatographic evaluation Acidic standard uv(x100,000) 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 3 VIRGIN 1 2 TOP 4 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00 2.25 2.50 2.75 3.00 3.25 3.50 3.75 4.00 4.25 4.50 4.75 5.00 5.25 5.50 5.75 6.00 6.25 6.50 6.75 min Mobile Phase : MeCN/20mM Potassium Phosphate Buffer (ph=3.2)=35/65 Flow rate : 0.2mL/min Oven temp : 40ºC Detection : UV, 254nm Sample : 1. Uracil 2. Benzoic acid 3. p-toluic acid 4. Methyl benzoate
eal, used silica sample analysis: ummary of chromatographic evaluation Aromatic standard Basic standard Acidic Standard N4 As4 k'4 Pressure (MPa) As2 As3 k'2/k' 3 As3 As4 k'3/k 4 VIRGIN 1,655 1.11 1.97 1.0 1.20 1.13 0.43 1.12 1.09 0.50 TOP 1,227 0.92 2.00 1.1 1.12 1.00 0.42 0.99 0.93 0.61 MIDDLE 1,183 0.89 1.88 1.0 1.07 0.94 0.46 0.96 0.90 0.51 BOTTOM 1,344 1.02 1.87 1.0 1.20 1.08 0.48 1.10 1.05 0.51 N : plate number, As ; asymmetry, k : (t-to)/to Acidic standard test is good indicator to judge how dirty silica is.
Elemental analysis after CIP using alternative agents C% H% N% VIRGIN 8.6 1.8 0 TOP 12.82 2.27 1.63 0.1M NaOH (15%ACN) 10CV 6M Guanidine hydrochloride (15%ACN) 10CV 8M Urea (15%ACN) 10CV HCOOH (15%ACN) 4CV 9.87 1.65 0.46 11.08 2.00 0.98 11.11 2.06 1.05 8.67 1.75 0.18
Standard chromatographic tests and what they can show us Aromatic Standard k 4 : Retention time for Naphtalene The shorter it goes the more ligand we lose. Deceptive Shows damage of silica Basic Standard k 2/k 3 : Ratio of retention time for the peaks The number gets bigger with increasing silanol exposure. Indicator of dirty silica Acidic Standard k 3/k 4 : Ratio of retention time for the peaks The number gets smaller with more Nitrogen removed.
SUMMARY Classic chromatography standard tests are used to indicate the state of the silica stationary phase providing non-invasive way. Now we can see whether the silica is cleaned enough or not. We can see how much damage has been inflected on the silica. These most valuable new tools provide way to re-evaluate the CIP step in the biggest RP HPLC applications. Better CIP provides longer silica life, resulting in better API production on more affordable way. This way we contribute to the elimination of suffering from this planet.