Gl 86B: a white dwarf orbits an exoplanet host star

Similar documents
Supplemental Materials to An Imaging Survey for Extrasolar Planets around 54 Close, Young Stars with SDI at the VLT and MMT 1

Suppressing Speckle Noise for Simultaneous Differential Extrasolar Planet Imaging (SDI) at the VLT and MMT

A wide brown dwarf binary around a planet-host star

Exploring the giant planet - brown dwarf connection with astrometry. Johannes Sahlmann ESA Research Fellow at ESAC

arxiv:astro-ph/ v3 21 Mar 2006

Searching for Other Worlds

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 30 Mar 2007

Exoplanets in the mid-ir with E-ELT & METIS

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.ga] 26 Feb 2011

DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICS AND ASTRONOMY. Planets around white dwarfs Matt Burleigh

Accurate Mass Determination of the Old White Dwarf G through Astrometric Microlensing

Searching for Extrasolar Planets with Simultaneous Differential Imaging

Extrasolar Planet Science with High-Precision Astrometry Johannes Sahlmann

Exoplanet Search Techniques: Overview. PHY 688, Lecture 28 April 3, 2009

Spectroscopic orbits of 10 nearby solar-type dwarfs

Indirect Methods: gravitational perturbation of the stellar motion. Exoplanets Doppler method

Fundamental (Sub)stellar Parameters: Masses and Radii. PHY 688, Lecture 10

Exoplanets Direct imaging. Direct method of exoplanet detection. Direct imaging: observational challenges

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 13 May 2004

Zelenchukskaya region, Karachai-Cherkesia, Russia H.FALCKE, R.OSTERBART, M.SCH OLLER AND G.WEIGELT

Extrasolar Planets. Methods of detection Characterization Theoretical ideas Future prospects

Transit detection limits for sub-stellar and terrestrial companions to white dwarfs

A high-contrast adaptiveoptics imaging search for brown dwarfs

arxiv: v2 [astro-ph] 18 Dec 2008

Observed Properties of Stars - 2 ASTR 2120 Sarazin

HD Transits HST/STIS First Transiting Exo-Planet. Exoplanet Discovery Methods. Paper Due Tue, Feb 23. (4) Transits. Transits.

Interferometric orbits of new Hipparcos binaries

Classical Methods for Determining Stellar Masses, Temperatures, and Radii

White Paper. Terrestrial and Habitable Planet Formation in Binary and Multi-star Systems

A Survey of Stellar Families Multiplicity of Solar-type Stars

White dwarfs with unresolved substellar companions and debris disks in the UKIDSS Survey

OGLE-TR-56. Guillermo Torres, Maciej Konacki, Dimitar D. Sasselov and Saurabh Jha INTRODUCTION

Exoplanets Direct imaging. Direct method of exoplanet detection. Direct imaging: observational challenges

Imaging planets around nearby white dwarfs

High contrast imaging at 3-5 microns. Philip M. Hinz University of Arizona Matt Kenworthy, Ari Heinze, John Codona, Roger Angel

Fundamental (Sub)stellar Parameters: Surface Gravity. PHY 688, Lecture 11

G.Witzel Physics and Astronomy Department, University of California, Los Angeles, CA , USA

Lines of Hydrogen. Most prominent lines in many astronomical objects: Balmer lines of hydrogen

Other planetary systems

arxiv:astro-ph/ v2 11 Oct 2005

ASTRONOMY. Chapter 18 THE STARS: A CELESTIAL CENSUS PowerPoint Image Slideshow

Metal-rich T-dwarfs in the Hyades cluster

arxiv:astro-ph/ v2 2 Mar 2005

Astronomy 421. Lecture 8: Binary stars

Chapter 10 Measuring the Stars

Characterizing Stars

Characterizing Stars. Guiding Questions. Parallax. Careful measurements of the parallaxes of stars reveal their distances

Analysis of Radial Velocity Measurements

Can We See Them?! Planet Detection! Planet is Much Fainter than Star!

Cover Page. The handle holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation

Observed Properties of Stars - 2 ASTR 2110 Sarazin

4. Direct imaging of extrasolar planets. 4.1 Expected properties of extrasolar planets. Sizes of gas giants, brown dwarfs & low-mass stars

Using Gravity to Measure the Mass of a Star

Hubble Science Briefing: 25 Years of Seeing Stars with the Hubble Space Telescope. March 5, 2015 Dr. Rachel Osten Dr. Alex Fullerton Dr.

TrES Exoplanets and False Positives: Finding the Needle in the Haystack

Brown Dwarfs and Planets around Nearby Stars. A Coronagraphic Search for. B. R. Oppenheimer (AMNH) Morino,, H. Suto,, M. Ishii, M. K.

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph] 22 Oct 2007

A novel L-band imaging search for giant planets in the Tucana and β Pictoris moving groups

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph] 3 Sep 2008

Lecture 12: Distances to stars. Astronomy 111

Extrasolar Transiting Planets: Detection and False Positive Rejection

Parallax: Measuring the distance to Stars

Extrasolar Planets in Double and Multiple Stellar Systems

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph] 26 Oct 2008

The Impact of Gaia on Our Knowledge of Stars and Their Planets

An Adaptive Optics Survey of M8-M9 stars: Discovery of 4 Very Low Mass Binaries With at Least One System Containing a Brown Dwarf Companion

Irradiated brown dwarfs

NACO-SDI DIRECT IMAGING SEARCH FOR THE EXOPLANET ERI b 1

Measuring Radial & Tangential Velocity. Radial velocity measurement. Tangential velocity measurement. Measure the star s Doppler shift

Measuring Radial & Tangential Velocity. Radial velocity measurement. Tangential velocity measurement. Measure the star s Doppler shift

Synergies between E-ELT and space instrumentation for extrasolar planet science

The UVES M Dwarf Planet Search Programme

Astrometric Detection of Exoplanets

Characterization of Exoplanets in the mid-ir with JWST & ELTs

ASTR-1020: Astronomy II Course Lecture Notes Section III

Introduction to SDSS -instruments, survey strategy, etc

5. A particular star has an angle of parallax of 0.2 arcsecond. What is the distance to this star? A) 50 pc B) 2 pc C) 5 pc D) 0.

Universe. Tenth Edition. The Nature of the Stars. Parallax. CHAPTER 17 The Nature of Stars

Characterization of variable stars using the ASAS and SuperWASP databases

Lecture 16 The Measuring the Stars 3/26/2018

Research Note An old nearby quadruple system Gliese 225.2

Planet Detection! Estimating f p!

Measuring Radial Velocities of Low Mass Eclipsing Binaries

Searching for Binary Y dwarfs with the Gemini GeMS Multi-Conjugate Adaptive Optics System

Mapping the oxygen abundance in an elliptical galaxy (NGC 5128)

The Pan-STARRS1 view of the Hyades cluster

Chapter 8: The Family of Stars

CCD astrometry and UBV photometry of visual binaries

GOODS/FORS2 Final Data Release: Version 3.0

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 15 Dec 2004

Science with EPICS, the E-ELT planet finder

Astronomy. The Nature of Stars

Science Olympiad Astronomy C Division Event National Exam

Planet Detection. Estimating f p

Concepción, Chile ABSTRACT

A new detached K7 dwarf eclipsing binary system

Characterization of the exoplanet host stars. Exoplanets Properties of the host stars. Characterization of the exoplanet host stars

Galactic, stellar (and planetary) archaeology with Gaia: The galactic white dwarf population

Searching for extrasolar planets with SPHERE. Mesa Dino, Raffaele Gratton, Silvano Desidera, Riccardo Claudi (INAF OAPD)

Transcription:

Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 361, L15 L19 (2005) doi:10.1111/j.1745-3933.2005.00055.x Gl 86B: a white dwarf orbits an exoplanet host star M. Mugrauer and R. Neuhäuser Astrophysikalisches Institut, Universität Jena, Schillergäßchen 2-3, 07745 Jena, Germany Accepted 2005 April 20. Received 2005 April 20; in original form 2005 March 22 ABSTRACT In this Letter we present our first high-contrast observations of the exoplanet host star Gl 86 using NAOS-CONICA (NACO) and its new Simultaneous Differential Imager (SDI) as well as results from NACO spectroscopy. Els et al. found a faint comoving companion located only 2 arcsec east of the exoplanet host star Gl 86A. Our high-contrast SDI observations rule out additional stellar companions from 1 au up to 23 au, and are sensitive for faint T- dwarf companions down to 35 M Jup.Wepresent evidence for orbital motion of Gl 86B around the exoplanet host star Gl 86A, which finally confirms that this is a bound binary system. With the given photometry from Els et al. and the NACO spectroscopy obtained, we prove that the companion Gl 86B is a cool white dwarf with an effective temperature of 5000 ± 500 K. This is the first confirmed white dwarf companion to an exoplanet host star and the first observational confirmation that planets survive the post-main-sequence evolution (giant phase and planetary nebula) of a star from which they are separated by only one to two dozen astronomical units, as expected from theory. Keywords: binaries: visual stars: individual: Gl 86 planetary systems white dwarfs. 1 INTRODUCTION Gliese 86 (hereafter Gl 86) is a K1 dwarf located at a distance of 10.9 ± 0.08 pc (Hipparcos, Perryman et al. 1997). Queloz et al. (2000) found a 15.8-d periodical variation of its radial velocity. Because Gl 86 does not show any chromospheric activity or photometric variability, they concluded that the variation of the radial velocity is induced by an exoplanet with a minimum mass of 4 M Jup on an almost circular orbit (e = 0.046, a = 0.11 au). Furthermore, they reported a long-term linear trend in the radial velocity data (0.5 ms 1 d 1 ) observed over a time-span of 20 years in the CORAVEL programme and also confirmed by CORALIE measurements (0.36 ms 1 d 1 ). This is a clear signature of a further stellar companion in the Gl 86 system with a period longer than 100yr (a > = 20 au). Els et al. (2001) found a faint companion 2 arcsec east of Gl 86 which clearly shares common proper motion. They also obtained near-infrared photometry (J = 14.7 ± 0.2, H = 14.4 ± 0.2 and K = 13.7 ± 0.2), and from the derived colour (J K 1) they concluded that Gl 86B must be substellar with a spectral type between late L and early T. However, a substellar companion (m 78 M Jup ) cannot explain the detected long-term trend in the radial velocity of the exoplanet host star. At the begin of 2005 we started a search for faint substellar companions of all exoplanet host stars known to harbour sev- eral substellar companions, i.e. several planets or (as in the case of Gl 86) one planet and a reported brown dwarf companion (see Els et al. 2001). Our goal is to detect additional companions. We carry out our observations at the Very Large Telescope (VLT) using NAOS-CONICA (NACO) and its new Simultaneous Differential Imager (SDI) which is particularly sensitive for faint cool substellar companions exhibiting strong methane absorption features (T dwarfs), yielding a much higher contrast than standard adaptive optics (AO) imaging with NACO alone. All our targets are main-sequence stars with ages in the range of 1 to 10 Gyr. From theoretical models (Baraffe et al. 2003) we expected that most of the substellar companions of our targets are T dwarfs cooler than 1400 K, which are detectable with NACO/SDI close to the primary stars. In Section 2 we describe our SDI observations, the obtained astrometry and photometry in detail. With the achieved high-contrast SDI imaging, we furthermore prove that there is no further companion in the system that could induce the reported long-term trend in the radial velocity of Gl 86A (Queloz et al. 2000). Spectra of Gl 86B were taken with NACO and were retrieved from the European Southern Observatory (ESO) public archive, yielding the surprising result that this companion is a white dwarf. We present the spectroscopy in Section 3. Finally, Section 4 summarizes and discusses all the results of this Letter. E-mail: markus@astro.uni-jena.de (MUG); rne@astro.uni-jena.de (NEU) Based on observations obtained at the European Southern Observatory on Paranal in ESO programmes 074.C-0262(A) and 070.C-0179(A), the latter taken from the public archive. 2 NACO/SDI OBSERVATIONS Detection of faint objects close to a much brighter source is the main challenge in the direct imaging search for substellar companions (brown dwarfs or planets) of stars. Within 1 arcsec of the bright C 2005 RAS

L16 M. Mugrauer and R. Neuhäuser central source the field is filled with speckles which are residuals from the imperfect AO correction of the incoming disturbed wavefront. The achievable signal-to-noise ratio in this speckle-noiselimited region does not increase with integration time, hence only a subtraction of the speckle pattern can improve the detection limit close to a bright source. At the ESO/VLT the SDI is offered for the AO system NACO (Lenzen et al. 2004). Therein a double Wollaston prism splits the beam, coming from the AO system, into four beams which then pass through three different narrow-band filters with central wavelengths 1.575, 1.600 and 1.625 µm and a bandwidth of 25 nm each. The resulting speckle patterns of the four images are almost identical. Since cool (T 1400 K) objects exhibit a strong methane absorption band at 1.62 µm, they appear much fainter in the 1.625-µm filter than in the 1.575-µm filter, while the bright star and therefore also the speckle pattern have roughly equal brightness in all images. Subtracting the 1.625-µm SDI image from the image taken through the 1.575-µm SDI filter will effectively cancel out the speckle pattern of the star while the signal from the cool companion remains (see e.g. Biller et al. 2004). We observed Gl 86 on 2005 January 12 with SDI (see Fig. 1). Owing to the small SDI field of view (5 5 arcsec 2, tilted by 45 ), jittering cannot be used for background subtraction. However, we applied a small jitter with a box width of only 0.2 arcsec (10 SDI pixels) to correct for bad pixels. Per jitter cycle five object frames were taken; each is the average of 60 exposures of 2 s each. We always adjusted the individual integration time so that only the central nine SDI pixels of the primary point spread function are saturated. This improves the detection limit for faint companions at larger separations from the primary. At the end of each jitter cycle a sky frame (10-arcsec offset from the target in RA and Dec.) Figure 1. 40 min of H-band imaging with SDI at the ESO VLT (north is up and east is to the left). This image is taken through the SDI narrow-band filter with a central wavelength of 1.575 µm. It is one out of four simultaneously taken images. The bright star in the centre is the exoplanet host star Gl 86A. The 10 mag fainter companion Gl 86B is located 2 arcsec east of the primary. Several bright speckles are clearly visible close to the primary star. was taken which was then subtracted from the five object frames to cancel out the bright infrared sky background. The sky frames were taken in the same way as the the target frames, i.e. 60 2-s integrations. The jitter cycle was repeated four times which yields a total on-source integration time of 40 min. To distinguish between faint companions and any residual speckles, we observed each target at the detector position angles 0 and 33, i.e. 2 40-min integration time in total. For infrared data reduction we used the ESO ECLIPSE package. After flat-fielding, we extracted the four SDI quadrants (top left 1.6 µm, top right 1.575 µm, both bottom quadrants 1.625 µm) and applied image registration, shifting and final averaging on all individual frames. Because the radial position of the speckles is proportional to the wavelength, all SDI images must be spatially rescaled. Finally the images were aligned, and their flux was adjusted to eliminate any differences in the quantum efficiency. The 1.575- and the 1.625- µm images (top right and bottom left quadrants) follow the same path through the SDI instrument, i.e. they provide a very similar speckle pattern and yield the best contrast for methane-rich companions. We therefore subtracted these two SDI images. The difference frame taken at position angle 0 was then subtracted from the difference frame taken at position angle 33.Tofilter out low spatial frequencies, all frames were unsharp-masked (see Fig. 2). The resulting difference frame compared with the image taken at 1.575 µm is shown in Fig. 2. The speckle pattern was effectively subtracted and a detection limit of 12.8 mag is reached at a separation of 0.5 arcsec. For astrometric calibration of the SDI camera we observed the binary HIP 9487. This system is listed in the Hipparcos catalogue (ρ = 1.876 ± 0.001 arcsec and θ = 278. 500 ± 0. 001 at epoch 1991.25) and accurate astrometry is available for both components. Therefore the binary separation and position angle can be computed for the given observing epoch (2005 January 12). We derive a pixel scale of 17.210 ± 0.087 mas per pixel. The true north is slightly rotated to the east by 0. 33 ± 0. 24. Owing to the large proper and parallactic motion of Gl 86 [µ α cos δ = 2092.59 ± 0.56 mas yr 1, µ δ = 654.49 ± 0.49 mas yr 1 and π = 91.63 ± 0.61 mas (Hipparcos, Perryman et al. 1997)], Els et al. (2001) had already proved that Gl 86A and B form a common proper motion pair, a result which is significantly (263σ in separation and 279σ in position angle) confirmed with our SDI observations (see Fig. 3). Gl 86B is located 1.93 ± 0.01 arcsec east of the exoplanet host star at a position angle of 104. 0 ± 0. 3. Fig. 3 illustrates the astrometry from Els et al. (2001) and our astrometric results. The expected change of separation and position angle is calculated assuming that only Gl 86A is moving and Gl 86B is an unrelated background star (see dashed lines in Fig. 3). By comparing our astrometry with data from Els et al. (2001), we find a significant change of 15. 5 ± 0. 5inposition angle and +0.196 ± 0.024 arcsec in separation for the given epoch difference. This is clear evidence for orbital motion. The expected orbital motion for a companion at a separation of 21 au is shown with dotted lines in Fig. 3 (0.090 arcsec yr 1 and 4. 2yr 1, see also Section 4). With the J, H and K infrared magnitudes of Gl 86B given by Els et al. (2001) and the Hipparcos parallax of Gl 86A, we derive the absolute magnitudes of Gl 86B: M J = 14.5 ± 0.2 mag, M H = 14.2 ± 0.2 mag, M K = 13.5 ± 0.2 mag. If we assume that Gl 86B is a brown dwarf companion then these absolute magnitudes are consistent with a spectral type L7 to T5 (see Vrba et al. 2004). In our SDI images Gl 86B is comparably bright in all three filters. We measure flux ratios F 1.575 µm /F 1.625 µm = 1.11 ± 0.04.

Gl 86B: a white dwarf orbits an exoplanet host star L17 250 225 if background 200 PA [ ] 175 150 125 mag.difference [mag] 1.575µm 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 difference image 0.075M (1997K) 0.070M (1289K) 0.050M (776K) 15 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 separation[arcsec] Figure 2. The upper left pattern shows the central part of Fig. 1 (2.8-arcsec box width). The detection limit for this image is illustrated as a dotted line in the bottom panel. The right-hand pattern shows the subtraction of the difference images (1.575 1.625 µm) taken at detector position angles 0 and 33. The speckle pattern is effectively subtracted and the achieved detection limit is improved close to the primary (see solid line). A magnitude difference of 12.8 mag is reached at 0.5 arcsec, which is 5.5 au in projected separation. The dashed horizontal lines illustrate the expected magnitude differences for substellar companions derived with Baraffe et al. s (2003) COND models, assuming a system age of 10 Gyr. All stellar companions can be detected beyond 0.1 arcsec, i.e. 1 au in projected separation, and Tdwarfs come into range beyond 0.2 arcsec (2 au). We are sensitive to substellar companions down to 35 M Jup.Gl86B is well detected in our SDI images and is shown as a black square. This clearly rules out spectral types later than T3, because for these spectral types F 1.575 µm /F 1.625 µm > 1.3 owing to methane absorption. 3 NACO SPECTROSCOPY Infrared spectra of Gl 86B were taken in ESO observing programme 070.C-0173(A) (extracted by us from the public archive). Eight spectra (120 s each) were taken in spectroscopic mode S27-SK- 3 using the 86-mas slit, which yields a resolving power λ/ λ = 1400. For background subtraction, 8-arcsec nodding was applied along the slit. To avoid the bright primary being located on or close to the slit (saturation), the slit was orientated perpendicular to the position vector of Gl 86B relative to the primary. All images were flat-fielded (lamp flats) and the spectra were extracted, wavelength-calibrated (with argon lines) and finally averaged with standard routines in IRAF. The resulting spectrum was flux-calibrated with the photometric standard HIP 020677 (G2 V). Fig. 4 shows the flux-calibrated NACO spectrum of Gl 86B, together with spectra separation [arcsec] 100 8 6 4 2 2000 2500 3000 3500 JD-2450000 2000 2500 3000 3500 JD-2450000 if background Figure 3. This plot illustrates the astrometric results for the Gl 86A/B system. The first data point is taken from Els et al. (2001) for epoch 2000. Our SDI astrometry significantly confirms the common proper motion of Gl 86B to its primary. The dashed lines illustrate the expected change in position angle and separation if only Gl 86A is moving and Gl 86B is a non-moving background source. The dotted lines show the expected orbital motion. of M1, L5 and T5 dwarfs from Cushing, Rayner & Vacca (2005). For the given spectral range the achieved signal-to-noise ratio is 40. Neither characteristic molecular nor atomic absorption features are visible, and the continuum is clearly different from those of L and T dwarfs. The spectrum is even steeper than the M1 V reference spectrum, which points to an effective temperature hotter than 3700 K. However, in the K band, the gradient of the continuum is only slightly varying for effective temperatures higher than 4000 K, so that we can only give a low-temperature limit for Gl 86B. Therefore we conclude that Gl 86B is a cool white dwarf companion (see Fig. 5). Owing to its high surface gravity (log g > 7), all absorption lines are strongly broadened and therefore hardly detectable [see e.g. the Br γ absorption line at 2.17 µm in Dobbie et al. (2005)]. We compare the absolute infrared photometry of Gl 86B with data from Bergeron, Leggett & Ruiz (2001), who carried out a detailed photometric and spectroscopic analysis of cool white dwarfs, and derive an effective temperature of 5000 ± 500 K. 4 CONCLUSIONS We have confirmed proper motion of Gl 86B common to that of its primary, and detected its orbital motion. This is clear evidence that Gl 86B is a bound companion of the exoplanet host star with a projected separation of 21 au (1.93 ± 0.01 arcsec). With the achieved high-contrast SDI detection limit we can rule out any further stellar companions beyond 0.1 arcsec up to 2.1 arcsec, i.e. 1 23 au in projected separation. T-dwarf companions (T < 1400 K) can

L18 M. Mugrauer and R. Neuhäuser WD2359-434 M1V 8660 K L5 T5 Figure 4. The NACO K-band spectrum of Gl 86B with comparison M1V, L5 and T5 spectra of cool dwarfs from Cushing et al. (2005). be detected beyond 0.2 arcsec (2 au) and we are sensitive to faint substellar companions down to 35 M Jup. The NACO spectrum of Gl 86B is clearly different from the expected spectral type between L5 and T5 derived from infrared photometry. Gl 86B is faint but its spectrum implies that it is even hotter than 3700 K (M1). Therefore we conclude that Gl 86B is a cool white dwarf companion. Queloz et al. (2000) reported a long-term trend in the radialvelocity data of Gl 86A (0.5 m s 1 d 1 ). This is a clear hint of a further stellar companion in the Gl 86 system. We compute that, with a separation of 21 au, the mass of Gl 86B must be 0.55 M to induce this trend in the radial velocity. The derived mass is well consistent with a white dwarf companion. Santos, Israelian & Mayor (2004) determined the mass of Gl 86A to be 0.7 M, hence the total mass of the system is 1.25 M and, with a binary semi-major axis of 21 au, the expected orbital time is 86 yr. This yields an orbital motion of 0.090 arcsec yr 1 and 4. 2yr 1, assuming a circular orbit, which is also consistent with the measured orbital motion (see Fig. 3). If we assume that both components of the binary have the same age, the white dwarf progenitor must be more massive than Gl 86A (0.7 M )tobeobservable today as a white dwarf companion. According to Weidemann (2000), a 0.55-M white dwarf is the remnant of a 1-M star. With the white dwarf models presented by Figure 5. The NACO K-band spectrum of Gl 86B with a comparison white dwarf spectrum from Dobbie et al. (2005). Richer et al. (2000) and the derived effective temperature of Gl 86B (5000 ± 500 K), we can approximate a cooling time-scale between 3 and 6 Gyr, i.e. the binary system should be 13 to 16 Gyr old. For more massive white dwarf progenitors (2 4 M ) the system age ranges between 2 and 8 Gyr. Gl 86B is the first confirmed white dwarf companion to an exoplanet host star. Theoretically, planets may or may not survive the red giant and asymptotic giant branch phases of stellar evolution. Planets that are located outside the envelope of the red giant, which reaches about a few hundred solar radii, will survive. Closer companions will either be destroyed or migrate inward and become a close companion to the white dwarf remnant. According to Burleigh, Clarke & Hodgkin (2002), it seems likely that distant planets (a > 5 au) survive the late stages of stellar evolution of main-sequence stars with masses in the range between 1 and 8 M, i.e. all white dwarf progenitors. In particular, in the Gl 86 system the separation between the white dwarf and the exoplanet (21 au) is large enough that it seems very well possible that the planet can survive the postmain-sequence phase of aforgdwarf. Furthermore, we should mention that Gl 86 is one of the closest binaries known today to harbour an exoplanet. Only two other systems [γ Ceph (a 19 au, e 0.36, see Hatzes et al. 2003) and HD 41004 (23 au, see Zucker et al. 2004)] have comparable separations. In such close binary systems the dynamical stability of planets is limited to a small region around the host star. According to Holman & Wiegert (1999), the critical semi-major axis a c for planets around Gl 86A is only 6.2 au assuming a circular binary orbit (m = 0.55 M and a = 21 au). Owing to mass loss during the post-main-sequence phase of the white dwarf progenitor, the binary separation was even smaller before (M tot a = constant a old = 15.4 au), i.e. a c = 3.7 au. We calculate the critical semi-major axis also for the two other close binaries and get a c = 7.5 au for HD 41004 and a c = 4.0 au for γ Ceph. We should mention that all exoplanets detected in these close binary systems actually reside within the proposed long-term stable regions. However, it would be of particular interest to search for further substellar companions in these close binaries to verify with observational results the published theoretical constraints of planet stability in binary systems. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank the technical staff of ESO Paranal Observatory for assistance in carrying out the observations.

Gl 86B: a white dwarf orbits an exoplanet host star L19 REFERENCES Baraffe I., Chabrier G., Barman T. S., Allard F., Hauschildt P. H., 2003, A&A, 402, 701 Bergeron P., Leggett S. K., Ruiz M. T., 2001, ApJS, 133, 413 Biller B. A., Close L., Lenzen R., Brandner W., McCarthy D. W., Nielsen E., Hartung M., 2004, SPIE, 5490, 389 Burleigh M. R., Clarke F. J., Hodgkin S. T., 2002, MNRAS, 331, 41 Cushing M. C., Rayner J. T., Vacca W. D., 2005, ApJ, 623, 1115 Dobbie P. D., Burleigh M. R., Levan A. J., Barstow M. A., Napiwotzki R., Holberg J. B., Hubeny I., Howell S. B., 2005, MNRAS, 357, 1049 Els S. G., Sterzik M. F., Marchis F., Pantin E., Endl M., Kürster M., 2001, A&A, 370, 1 Hatzes A. P., Cochran W. D., Endl M., McArthur B., Paulson D. B., Walker G. A. H., Campbell B., Yang S., 2003, ApJ, 599, 1383 Holman M. J., Wiegert P. A., 1999, AJ, 117, 621 Lenzen R., Close L., Brandner W., Biller B., Hartung M., 2004, SPIE, 5492, 970 Perryman M. A. C. et al., 1997, A&A, 323, 49 Queloz D. et al., 2000, A&A, 354, 99 Richer H. B., Hansen B., Limongi M., Chieffi A., Straniero O., Fahlman G. G., 2000, ApJ, 529, 318 Santos N. C., Israelian G., Mayor M., 2004, A&A, 415, 1153 Vrba F. J. et al., 2004, AJ, 127, 2948 Weidemann V., 2000, A&A, 363, 647 Zucker S., Mazeh T., Santos N. C., Udry S., Mayor M., 2004, A&A, 426, 695 This paper has been typeset from a TEX/LATEX file prepared by the author.