Control Charts for Mean for Non-Normally Correlated Data

Similar documents
11 Correlation and Regression

Estimation of Gumbel Parameters under Ranked Set Sampling

Bootstrap Intervals of the Parameters of Lognormal Distribution Using Power Rule Model and Accelerated Life Tests

Extreme Value Charts and Analysis of Means (ANOM) Based on the Log Logistic Distribution

The Sampling Distribution of the Maximum. Likelihood Estimators for the Parameters of. Beta-Binomial Distribution

1 Inferential Methods for Correlation and Regression Analysis

A statistical method to determine sample size to estimate characteristic value of soil parameters

A proposed discrete distribution for the statistical modeling of

Control chart for number of customers in the system of M [X] / M / 1 Queueing system

Investigating the Significance of a Correlation Coefficient using Jackknife Estimates

Linear Regression Models

Nonlinear regression

A Generalized Class of Estimators for Finite Population Variance in Presence of Measurement Errors

Bayesian and E- Bayesian Method of Estimation of Parameter of Rayleigh Distribution- A Bayesian Approach under Linex Loss Function

Estimation of Population Mean Using Co-Efficient of Variation and Median of an Auxiliary Variable

A General Family of Estimators for Estimating Population Variance Using Known Value of Some Population Parameter(s)

Example: Find the SD of the set {x j } = {2, 4, 5, 8, 5, 11, 7}.

Estimating the Change Point of Bivariate Binomial Processes Experiencing Step Changes in Their Mean

Econ 325/327 Notes on Sample Mean, Sample Proportion, Central Limit Theorem, Chi-square Distribution, Student s t distribution 1.

Approximations to the Distribution of the Sample Correlation Coefficient

CONTROL CHARTS FOR THE LOGNORMAL DISTRIBUTION

Properties and Hypothesis Testing

CHAPTER 4 BIVARIATE DISTRIBUTION EXTENSION

Random Variables, Sampling and Estimation

Bayesian Methods: Introduction to Multi-parameter Models

Chapter 22. Comparing Two Proportions. Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 11 Output Analysis for a Single Model. Banks, Carson, Nelson & Nicol Discrete-Event System Simulation

Lecture 19: Convergence

Modified Lilliefors Test

Precise Rates in Complete Moment Convergence for Negatively Associated Sequences

Chapter 13, Part A Analysis of Variance and Experimental Design

Topic 9: Sampling Distributions of Estimators

Stochastic Simulation

Output Analysis (2, Chapters 10 &11 Law)

Power Comparison of Some Goodness-of-fit Tests

Approximate Confidence Interval for the Reciprocal of a Normal Mean with a Known Coefficient of Variation

The standard deviation of the mean

Using the IML Procedure to Examine the Efficacy of a New Control Charting Technique

Statistical Inference (Chapter 10) Statistical inference = learn about a population based on the information provided by a sample.

The target reliability and design working life

Sampling, Sampling Distribution and Normality

Joint Probability Distributions and Random Samples. Jointly Distributed Random Variables. Chapter { }

t distribution [34] : used to test a mean against an hypothesized value (H 0 : µ = µ 0 ) or the difference

Chapter 6 Sampling Distributions

Amsterdam School of Communication Research (ASCoR), University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands loet [at] leydesdorff dot net

Comparing Two Populations. Topic 15 - Two Sample Inference I. Comparing Two Means. Comparing Two Pop Means. Background Reading

Chapter 22. Comparing Two Proportions. Copyright 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc.

STA Learning Objectives. Population Proportions. Module 10 Comparing Two Proportions. Upon completing this module, you should be able to:

ON POINTWISE BINOMIAL APPROXIMATION

Statistical inference: example 1. Inferential Statistics

Modified Ratio Estimators Using Known Median and Co-Efficent of Kurtosis

Chain ratio-to-regression estimators in two-phase sampling in the presence of non-response

Algebra of Least Squares

Econ 325 Notes on Point Estimator and Confidence Interval 1 By Hiro Kasahara

A LARGER SAMPLE SIZE IS NOT ALWAYS BETTER!!!

G. R. Pasha Department of Statistics Bahauddin Zakariya University Multan, Pakistan

ENGI 4421 Confidence Intervals (Two Samples) Page 12-01

Basis for simulation techniques

There is no straightforward approach for choosing the warmup period l.

CEE 522 Autumn Uncertainty Concepts for Geotechnical Engineering

Examination of Proper Randomness of the Numbers Generated by Rand Corporation (1955) Random Number Table: t-test

ECE 8527: Introduction to Machine Learning and Pattern Recognition Midterm # 1. Vaishali Amin Fall, 2015

Lecture 7: Properties of Random Samples

A Relationship Between the One-Way MANOVA Test Statistic and the Hotelling Lawley Trace Test Statistic

ESTIMATION AND PREDICTION BASED ON K-RECORD VALUES FROM NORMAL DISTRIBUTION

Comparison Study of Series Approximation. and Convergence between Chebyshev. and Legendre Series

A goodness-of-fit test based on the empirical characteristic function and a comparison of tests for normality

KLMED8004 Medical statistics. Part I, autumn Estimation. We have previously learned: Population and sample. New questions

Improved Class of Ratio -Cum- Product Estimators of Finite Population Mean in two Phase Sampling

Problem Set 4 Due Oct, 12

GUIDE FOR THE USE OF THE DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM (DSS)*

3/3/2014. CDS M Phil Econometrics. Types of Relationships. Types of Relationships. Types of Relationships. Vijayamohanan Pillai N.

Statistical Analysis on Uncertainty for Autocorrelated Measurements and its Applications to Key Comparisons

Modeling and Estimation of a Bivariate Pareto Distribution using the Principle of Maximum Entropy

Goodness-Of-Fit For The Generalized Exponential Distribution. Abstract

x iu i E(x u) 0. In order to obtain a consistent estimator of β, we find the instrumental variable z which satisfies E(z u) = 0. z iu i E(z u) = 0.

Mathematical Modeling of Optimum 3 Step Stress Accelerated Life Testing for Generalized Pareto Distribution

Statistical Fundamentals and Control Charts

Double Stage Shrinkage Estimator of Two Parameters. Generalized Exponential Distribution

New Entropy Estimators with Smaller Root Mean Squared Error

Access to the published version may require journal subscription. Published with permission from: Elsevier.

V. Nollau Institute of Mathematical Stochastics, Technical University of Dresden, Germany

R. van Zyl 1, A.J. van der Merwe 2. Quintiles International, University of the Free State

Because it tests for differences between multiple pairs of means in one test, it is called an omnibus test.

Enhancing ratio estimators for estimating population mean using maximum value of auxiliary variable

ANOTHER WEIGHTED WEIBULL DISTRIBUTION FROM AZZALINI S FAMILY

Power and Type II Error

Derivation of the Exponential Distribution through an Infinite Sine Series

Stat 319 Theory of Statistics (2) Exercises

TMA4245 Statistics. Corrected 30 May and 4 June Norwegian University of Science and Technology Department of Mathematical Sciences.

Solutions to Odd Numbered End of Chapter Exercises: Chapter 4

MOMENT-METHOD ESTIMATION BASED ON CENSORED SAMPLE

SYSTEMATIC SAMPLING FOR NON-LINEAR TREND IN MILK YIELD DATA

Response Variable denoted by y it is the variable that is to be predicted measure of the outcome of an experiment also called the dependent variable

Trimmed Mean as an Adaptive Robust Estimator of a Location Parameter for Weibull Distribution

Asymptotic distribution of products of sums of independent random variables

Varanasi , India. Corresponding author

SRC Technical Note June 17, Tight Thresholds for The Pure Literal Rule. Michael Mitzenmacher. d i g i t a l

On the Use of White Test for Heteroskedasticity in the Presence of Autocorrelation

STATISTICAL PROPERTIES OF LEAST SQUARES ESTIMATORS. Comments:

Transcription:

Joural of Moder Applied Statistical Methods Volume 16 Issue 1 Article 5 5-1-017 Cotrol Charts for Mea for No-Normally Correlated Data J. R. Sigh Vikram Uiversity, Ujjai, Idia Ab Latif Dar School of Studies i Statistics, Vikram Uiversity, Ujjai, Idia, lateefdar.007@rediffmail.com Follow this ad additioal works at: http://digitalcommos.waye.edu/jmasm Part of the Applied Statistics Commos, Social ad Behavioral Scieces Commos, ad the Statistical heory Commos Recommeded Citatio Sigh, J. R. & Dar, A. L. (017). Cotrol charts for mea for o-ormally correlated data. Joural of Moder Applied Statistical Methods, 16(1), 45-460. doi: 10.37/jmasm/1493598300 his Regular Article is brought to you for free ad ope access by the Ope Access Jourals at DigitalCommos@WayeState. It has bee accepted for iclusio i Joural of Moder Applied Statistical Methods by a authorized editor of DigitalCommos@WayeState.

Joural of Moder Applied Statistical Methods May 017, Vol. 16, No. 1, 45-460. doi: 10.37/jmasm/1493598300 Copyright 017 JMASM, Ic. ISSN 1538 947 Cotrol Charts for Mea for No-Normally Correlated Data J. R. Sigh Vikram Uiversity Ujjai, Idia Ab Latif Dar Vikram Uiversity Ujjai, Idia raditioally, quality cotrol methodology is based o the assumptio that seriallygeerated data are idepedet ad ormally distributed. O the basis of these assumptios the operatig characteristic (OC) fuctio of the cotrol chart is derived after settig the cotrol limits. But i practice, may of the basic idustrial variables do ot satisfy both the assumptios ad hece oe may doubt the validity of the ifereces draw from the cotrol charts. I this paper the power of the cotrol chart for the mea is examied whe both the assumptios of idepedece ad ormality are ot teable. he OC fuctio is calculated ad compared with the ormal populatio. Keywords: Cotrol chart, correlatio, Edgeworth Series, stadardized cumulats Itroductio he quality cotrol techiques curretly used i idustry are aimed at the detectio of chages i the productio process that result i quality defects. Quality cotrol charts are curretly the most widely-adopted cotrol techique. raditioally, quality cotrol methodology is based o the assumptio that serially-geerated data are idepedet ad ormally distributed. Uder these coditios, appropriate cotrol limits for ca be worked out from the tables available i stadard textbooks o statistical quality cotrol. But i practice, may of the basic idustrial processes do ot satisfy both the assumptios ad hece oe may doubt the validity of the iferece draw from the cotrol charts. Alwa (199) studied the effect of auto-correlatio o cotrol chart performace. Maragah ad Woodall (199) studied the effect of auto-correlatio o the retrospective -chart. Alwa ad Roberts (1995) coducted ivestigatios of cotrol charts whe the assumptios of ormality, idepedece, or both are violated. Dar ad Sigh (015) studied the effect of correlatio o the power of Ab Latif Dar is a Professor i the School of Studies i Statistics. Email them at: lateefdar.007@rediffmail.com. 45

SINGH & DAR the chart. he purpose of this study is to cosider the power of the cotrol chart ad the effect of correlatio o ype-i error ad the OC fuctio, ad also to cosider relaxig the assumptio of ormality ad cosiderig the productio process to follow a o-ormal distributio represeted by the first four terms of a Edgeworth series. Effect of Correlatio o OC Fuctio for Normal Case Suppose that the observatios x 1, x,, x have a multivariate ormal distributio with E(x i ) = μ, V(x i ) = σ ad ρ is the commo correlatio coefficiet betwee ay x i ad x j, i j. he E x Var x 1 1 (1) where 1 1 () he power of the cotrol chart is judged by its OC fuctio. he cotrol chart for the mea is set up by drawig the cetral lie at the process average θ ad the cotrol limits at k where σ is the process stadard deviatio ad is the sample size. he OC fuctio gives the probability that the cotrol chart idicates the value θ as the process average, whe it is actually ot θ, but 453

CONROL CHARS FOR MEAN 454 where is as defied i equatio (). he OC fuctio is derived by itegratig the distributio of the mea with θʹ as the process average betwee the limits of the cotrol chart. For the ormal populatio uder correlated data, 1 f (3) he distributio of the sample mea is give by g (4) where 1 exp ad π r r r t d t t t dt he OC fuctio is obtaied after replacig θ i (4) by θʹ ad itegratig it betwee the limits of the cotrol chart as k k N L d (5) k k N L d (6) Makig the trasformatio y

SINGH & DAR ad y γ = t sequetially, the above itegral simplifies to L N k k 1 (7) he error of ype I gives the probability of searchig for assigable causes whe i fact there are o such causes. It is give by k 1 k g d (8) After itegratig above as i the case of the OC fuctio we will get k (9) he Effect of No-Normally Correlated Data o OC Fuctio For o-ormal populatios represeted by the first four terms of a Edgeworth series, f 3 3 4 4 1 6 4 3 6 7 (10) where 3 1 4 3 are the stadardized third ad fourth cumulats, respectively. he distributio of the sample mea for correlated data ca be derived, by followig Gaye (195), as ad 455

CONROL CHARS FOR MEAN g 3 3 6 4 4 3 6 4 7 (11) he OC fuctio is obtaied after replacig θ i equatio (11) by θʹ ad itegratig it betwee the limits of the cotrol chart, i.e. betwee k Itegratig i the similar way as for the ormal case, we get. L L L L (1) N u b where L N is give by equatio (7). he other two terms of the OC fuctio are give by 13 k 3 k 5 k L u 34 3 7 (13) 13 k 3 k 5 k L b 34 3 7 (14) he ype-i error for the o-ormal populatio works out to be k 1 k g d c (15) where α as defied by equatio (9) is the ype-i error whe the populatio is ormal ad depedet, ad 3 5 3 k c k 4 3 36 (16) is the correctio for o-ormality ad depedecies i ype-i error. 456

SINGH & DAR able 1. Value of ype-i error for ormally ad correlated data K = K = 3 ρ = 0.0 ρ = 0. ρ = 0.5 ρ = 0.8 ρ = 0.0 ρ = 0. ρ = 0.5 ρ = 0.8 5 0.04550 0.13603 0.481 0.3911 0.0069 0.0534 0.0836 0.1433 10 0.04550 0.300 0.39377 0.48491 0.0070 0.07300 0.0083 0.9480 15 0.04550 0.30490 0.47950 0.5669 0.0070 0.1381 0.8884 0.39040 able. Value of OC fuctio for ormally ad correlated data K = K = 3 γ ρ = 0.0 ρ = 0. ρ = 0.5 ρ = 0.8 ρ = 0.0 ρ = 0. ρ = 0.5 ρ = 0.8 5-0.993 0.3050 0.1981 0.1514 0.8413 0.593 0.394 0.956-1 0.9997 0.6818 0.5458 0.4663 0.977 0.8911 0.7647 0.6717 0 0.9999 0.8639 0.7517 0.6708 0.9973 0.9746 0.9167 0.8567 1 0.9997 0.6818 0.5458 0.4663 0.977 0.8911 0.7647 0.6717 0.993 0.3050 0.1981 0.1514 0.8413 0.593 0.394 0.956 10-0.5000 0.098 0.135 0.0930 0.8413 0.4179 0.350 0.1693-1 0.8400 0.5633 0.4095 0.3368 0.977 0.7835 0.5986 0.4987 0 0.9545 0.7680 0.606 0.5151 0.9973 0.970 0.799 0.705 1 0.8400 0.5633 0.4095 0.3368 0.977 0.7835 0.5986 0.4987 0.5000 0.098 0.135 0.0930 0.8413 0.4179 0.350 0.1693 15-0.5000 0.1638 0.0946 0.0717 0.8413 0.3 0.177 0.148-1 0.8400 0.4890 0.3409 0.766 0.977 0.6995 0.5045 0.414 0 0.9545 0.6951 0.505 0.4331 0.9973 0.876 0.711 0.6096 1 0.8400 0.4890 0.3409 0.766 0.977 0.6995 0.5045 0.414 0.5000 0.1638 0.0946 0.0717 0.8413 0.3 0.177 0.148 Results ad Coclusio For ormal populatios with correlatio coefficiet ρ = 0, 0., 0.5, ad 0.8, the values of ype-i error have bee computed ad give i able 1 for k =, 3 ad = 5, 10, 15. able 1 clearly idicates that the effect of correlatio o ype-i error is quite substatial as the error icreases with the icrease i ρ. For example, for = 5, k =, ad ρ = 0, 0., 0.5, ad 0.8, the correspodig values of ype-i error are 0.04550, 0.13605, 0.481, ad 0.3911. hough the effect goes o decreasig with icreasig k, it still affects the value of ype-i error quite largely. For o-ormal populatios we have a similar result (able 3) as the error goes o icreasig with a icrease i the value of ρ, λ 3, ad λ 4. From able, it is evidet that the value of the OC are affected seriously as the correlatio betwee the observatios icreases. For example, for ρ = 0, k =, = 5, ad γ = ±1, the value 457

CONROL CHARS FOR MEAN of the OC is 0.9997, while for ρ = 0., 0.5, 0.8, k =, ad = 5, the value reduces to 0.6818, 0.5458, 0.4663. For other values of = 10, 15, we have a similar results. he values of the OC for o-ormal populatios with k =, = 5 ad for differet values of ρ = 0, 0., 0.5, 0.8 are give i able 4. For ρ = 0 ad (λ 3, λ 4 ) = (0, 0) we get tabulated values of Sigh, Sakle, ad Ahmad (01), which are show i able 4. he effect of correlatio o the OC fuctio remais more or less of the same magitude whe we move from ormal to o-ormal populatios. As is evidet from the able 4, for ρ = 0, λ 3 = 0, λ 4 = 0, ad γ = ±1, the value of the OC fuctio is 0.8400 while for ρ = 0.5, λ 3 = 0.5, λ 4 = 0.5, ad γ = ±1, the correspodig value of the OC fuctio is reduced to 0.375. O chagig λ 3 (skewess), λ 4 (kurtosis), or both at the same time, the value of the OC is affected. herefore, it may be iferred that the violatio i the assumptios of idepedece ad ormality have a serious effect o the cotrol chart performace ad it is advisable to take ito accout the depedece ad oormality of the paret populatio while desigig cotrol charts. able 3. Values of the ype-i error for o-ormally correlated data K = K = 3 ρ λ3 λ4=0.0 λ4=0.5 λ4=1.0 λ4=.0 λ4=0.0 λ4=0. λ4=0.5 λ4=0.8 0.0 5 0.0 0.0455 0.0464 0.0473 0.0491 0.007 0.0034 0.0040 0.0054 0.5 0.044 0.0451 0.0459 0.0477 0.008 0.0035 0.0041 0.0055 10 0.0 0.0455 0.0459 0.0464 0.0473 0.007 0.0030 0.0034 0.0040 0.5 0.0448 0.0453 0.0457 0.0466 0.008 0.0031 0.0034 0.0041 15 0.0 0.0455 0.0458 0.0461 0.0467 0.007 0.009 0.0031 0.0036 0.5 0.0451 0.0454 0.0456 0.046 0.007 0.0030 0.003 0.0036 0. 5 0.0 0.1360 0.1338 0.1315 0.169 0.053 0.075 0.097 0.0341 0.5 0.1349 0.136 0.1303 0.158 0.035 0.057 0.079 0.033 10 0.0 0.30 0.77 0.34 0.149 0.0730 0.0734 0.0737 0.0744 0.5 0.33 0.90 0.47 0.161 0.0711 0.0715 0.0718 0.075 15 0.0 0.3049 0.999 0.950 0.850 0.138 0.16 0.113 0.1188 0.5 0.3073 0.303 0.973 0.874 0.18 0.115 0.103 0.1178 0.5 5 0.0 0.48 0.384 0.85 0.088 0.0833 0.0833 0.0833 0.0833 0.5 0.516 0.418 0.319 0.1 0.0794 0.0794 0.0794 0.0794 10 0.0 0.3938 0.3814 0.3691 0.3445 0.008 0.1938 0.1867 0.177 0.5 0.401 0.3889 0.3766 0.3519 0.00 0.1949 0.1879 0.1738 15 0.0 0.4795 0.4673 0.4551 0.4307 0.888 0.788 0.687 0.487 0.5 0.4878 0.4756 0.4634 0.4390 0.933 0.833 0.73 0.531 458

SINGH & DAR able 3, cotiued. K = K = 3 ρ λ3 λ4=0.0 λ4=0.5 λ4=1.0 λ4=.0 λ4=0.0 λ4=0. λ4=0.5 λ4=0.8 0.8 5 0.0 0.391 0.3118 0.944 0.598 0.143 0.137 0.131 0.119 0.5 0.3381 0.308 0.3034 0.688 0.1411 0.1351 0.191 0.1171 10 0.0 0.4849 0.466 0.4474 0.4099 0.948 0.791 0.634 0.30 0.5 0.4978 0.4790 0.4603 0.48 0.300 0.863 0.706 0.39 15 0.0 0.5669 0.5494 0.5318 0.4967 0.3904 0.37 0.3541 0.3177 0.5 0.5799 0.563 0.5447 0.5096 0.4013 0.383 0.3650 0.386 able 4. Values of OC fuctio for o-ormally correlated data (λ 3, λ 4 ) ρ γ (0.0,0.0) (0.0,0.5) (0.0,1.0) (0.0,.0) (0.5,0.0) (0.5,0.5) (0.5,1.0) (0.5,.0) 0.0-0.5000 0.5000 0.4999 0.4999 0.4850 0.4850 0.4849 0.4849-1 0.8400 0.8408 0.8417 0.8434 0.8396 0.8413 0.8430 0.8464 0 0.9545 0.9540 0.9536 0.957 0.9545 0.9536 0.957 0.9509 1 0.8400 0.8408 0.8417 0.8434 0.8404 0.840 0.8437 0.8471 0.5000 0.5000 0.4999 0.4999 0.5150 0.5149 0.5149 0.5148 0. - 0.098 0.063 0.08 0.1957 0.0 0.1986 0.1951 0.1881-1 0.5633 0.5638 0.5643 0.5653 0.5633 0.5430 0.5435 0.5445 0 0.7680 0.773 0.7766 0.7851 0.7680 0.773 0.7766 0.7851 1 0.5633 0.5638 0.5643 0.5653 0.5633 0.5846 0.5851 0.5861 0.098 0.063 0.08 0.1957 0.19 0.139 0.104 0.033 0.5-0.135 0.1178 0.110 0.1006 0.19 0.117 0.1115 0.1000-1 0.4095 0.4069 0.404 0.3990 0.375 0.375 0.3699 0.3646 0 0.606 0.6186 0.6309 0.6555 0.606 0.6186 0.6309 0.6555 1 0.4095 0.4069 0.404 0.3990 0.4439 0.4413 0.4386 0.4333 0.135 0.1178 0.110 0.1006 0.141 0.1183 0.116 0.101 0.8-0.0930 0.0860 0.0790 0.0649 0.0968 0.0898 0.088 0.0687-1 0.3368 0.3314 0.360 0.315 0.3314 0.3314 0.360 0.315 0 0.5151 0.5338 0.556 0.5901 0.5338 0.5338 0.556 0.5901 1 0.3368 0.3314 0.360 0.315 0.3314 0.3314 0.360 0.315 0.0930 0.0860 0.0790 0.0649 0.0860 0.0860 0.0790 0.0649 Refereces Alwa, L. C. (199). Effects of autocorrelatio o cotrol chart performace. Commuicatios i Statistics heory ad Methods, 1(4), 105-1049. doi: 10.1080/03610990883089 459

CONROL CHARS FOR MEAN Alwa, L. C., & Roberts, H. V. (1995). he problem of misplaced cotrol limits. Joural of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C (Applied Statistics), 44(3), 69-78. doi: 10.307/986036 Dar, A. L., & Sigh, J. R. (015). he power of -chart i presece of data correlatio. Joural of Reliability ad Statistical Studies, 8(1), 5-30. Retrieved from http://www.jrss.i.et/assets/8103.pdf Gaye, A. K. (195). O settig up cotrol charts for o-ormal samples. Idia Society for Quality Cotrol Bulleti, 53, 43-47. Maragah, H. D, & Woodall, W. H. (199). he effect of autocorrelatio o the retrospective -chart. Joural of Statistical Computatio ad Simulatio, 40(1-), 9-4. doi: 10.1080/0094965908811363 Sigh, J. R., Sakle, R., & Ahmad, M. (01). Cotrol charts for mea uder correlated data. Joural of Rajastha Statistical Associatio, 1(1), 1-30. 460