«CALCULATION OF ISOTOPE BURN-UP AND CHANGE IN EFFICIENCY OF ABSORBING ELEMENTS OF WWER-1000 CONTROL AND PROTECTION SYSTEM DURING BURN-UP».

Similar documents
SUB-CHAPTER D.1. SUMMARY DESCRIPTION

Introduction to Reactivity and Reactor Control

Shutdown Margin. Xenon-Free Xenon removes neutrons from the life-cycle. So, xenonfree is the most reactive condition.

Lectures on Applied Reactor Technology and Nuclear Power Safety. Lecture No 4. Title: Control Rods and Sub-critical Systems

MONTE CALRLO MODELLING OF VOID COEFFICIENT OF REACTIVITY EXPERIMENT

CANDU Safety #3 - Nuclear Safety Characteristics Dr. V.G. Snell Director Safety & Licensing

Reactivity Coefficients

Fuel Element Burnup Determination in HEU - LEU Mixed TRIGA Research Reactor Core

Heterogeneous Description of Fuel Assemblies for Correct Estimation of Control Rods Efficiency in BR-1200

17 Neutron Life Cycle

Estimation of Control Rods Worth for WWR-S Research Reactor Using WIMS-D4 and CITATION Codes

Study of Control rod worth in the TMSR

A Dummy Core for V&V and Education & Training Purposes at TechnicAtome: In and Ex-Core Calculations

Testing of the SERPENT 2 Software Package and Calculation of the VVR-ts Research Reactor Lifetime

DEVELOPMENT OF HIGH RESOLUTION X-RAY CT TECHNIQUE FOR IRRADIATED FUEL ASSEMBLY

Lesson 14: Reactivity Variations and Control

Figure 22.1 Unflattened Flux Distribution

Chem 481 Lecture Material 4/22/09

The moderator temperature coefficient MTC is defined as the change in reactivity per degree change in moderator temperature.

Study of boron dilution phenomenon in the core and fuel assemblies of Bushehr VVER-1000 reactor in normal operating conditions

Chapter 7 & 8 Control Rods Fission Product Poisons. Ryan Schow

Lectures on Applied Reactor Technology and Nuclear Power Safety. Lecture No 5. Title: Reactor Kinetics and Reactor Operation

Profile SFR-64 BFS-2. RUSSIA

CONTROL ROD WORTH EVALUATION OF TRIGA MARK II REACTOR

Hybrid Low-Power Research Reactor with Separable Core Concept

Research Article Analysis of NEA-NSC PWR Uncontrolled Control Rod Withdrawal at Zero Power Benchmark Cases with NODAL3 Code

Study of the End Flux Peaking for the CANDU Fuel Bundle Types by Transport Methods

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF WWER-440 REACTOR CORE WITH PARCS/HELIOS AND PARCS/SERPENT CODES

Coupling of thermal-mechanics and thermalhydraulics codes for the hot channel analysis of RIA events First steps in AEKI toward multiphysics

The Lead-Based VENUS-F Facility: Status of the FREYA Project

Development of 3D Space Time Kinetics Model for Coupled Neutron Kinetics and Thermal hydraulics

POST SERVICE INVESTIGATIONS OF VVER-440 RPV STEEL FROM NPP GREIFSWALD

Task 3 Desired Stakeholder Outcomes

3. State each of the four types of inelastic collisions, giving an example of each (zaa type example is acceptable)

Reactor Kinetics and Operation

Fuel BurnupCalculations and Uncertainties

Neutronic Calculations of Ghana Research Reactor-1 LEU Core

Power Installations based on Activated Nuclear Reactions of Fission and Synthesis

X. Neutron and Power Distribution

Impact of the Hypothetical RCCA Rodlet Separation on the Nuclear Parameters of the NPP Krško core

Parametric Study of Control Rod Exposure for PWR Burnup Credit Criticality Safety Analyses

Safety Analysis of Loss of Flow Transients in a Typical Research Reactor by RELAP5/MOD3.3

USA HTR NEUTRONIC CHARACTERIZATION OF THE SAFARI-1 MATERIAL TESTING REACTOR

REACTOR PHYSICS ASPECTS OF PLUTONIUM RECYCLING IN PWRs

Reactivity Power and Temperature Coefficients Determination of the TRR

The Effect of 99 Mo Production on the Neutronic Safety Parameters of Research Reactors

PWR CONTROL ROD EJECTION ANALYSIS WITH THE MOC CODE DECART

Lecture 27 Reactor Kinetics-III

Nuclear Theory - Course 227 NEUTRON FLUX DISTRI~UTION

REFLECTOR FEEDBACK COEFFICIENT: NEUTRONIC CONSIDERATIONS IN MTR-TYPE RESEARCH REACTORS ABSTRACT

Quiz, Physics & Chemistry

NEUTRON PHYSICAL ANALYSIS OF SIX ENERGETIC FAST REACTORS

Steady-State and Transient Neutronic and Thermal-hydraulic Analysis of ETDR using the FAST code system

Advanced Heavy Water Reactor. Amit Thakur Reactor Physics Design Division Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, INDIA

LECTURE 4: CORE DESIGN ANALYSIS

UNCERTAINTY AND SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF THE OECD/NEA KALININ-3 BENCHMARK. {Ihor.Pasichnyk, Winfried.Zwermann,

NEW COMPLEX OF MODERATORS FOR CONDENSED MATTER RESEARCH AT THE IBR-2M REACTOR *

DOPPLER COEFFICIENT OF REACTIVITY BENCHMARK CALCULATIONS FOR DIFFERENT ENRICHMENTS OF UO 2

Operational Reactor Safety

EFFECT OF DISTRIBUTION OF VOLUMETRIC HEAT GENERATION ON MODERATOR TEMPERATURE DISTRIBUTION

CRITICAL AND SUBCRITICAL EXPERIMENTS USING THE TRAINING NUCLEAR REACTOR OF THE BUDAPEST UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY AND ECONOMICS

Thorium-Cycle Fission for Green Nuclear Power. Pt Peter McIntyre MIt Texas A&M University

The Dynamical Loading of the WWER440/V213 Reactor Pressure Vessel Internals during LOCA Accident in Hot and Cold Leg of the Primary Circuit

CALCULATION OF TEMPERATURE REACTIVITY COEFFICIENTS IN KRITZ-2 CRITICAL EXPERIMENTS USING WIMS ABSTRACT

Simulating the Behaviour of the Fast Reactor JOYO

Neutron reproduction. factor ε. k eff = Neutron Life Cycle. x η

JOYO MK-III Performance Test at Low Power and Its Analysis

(1) SCK CEN, Boeretang 200, B-2400 Mol, Belgium (2) Belgonucléaire, Av. Arianelaan 4, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium

Safety Analyses for Dynamical Events (SADE) SAFIR2018 Interim Seminar Ville Sahlberg

Lectures on Applied Reactor Technology and Nuclear Power Safety. Lecture No 6

The Effect of Burnup on Reactivity for VVER-1000 with MOXGD and UGD Fuel Assemblies Using MCNPX Code

Verification of Predicted Powers and Shim Positions for Advanced Test Reactor Cycle 159A-1

Nuclear Theory - Course 227 REACTIVITY EFFECTS DUE TO TEMPERATURE CHANGES

Fundamentals of Nuclear Reactor Physics

YALINA-Booster Conversion Project

Testing the EPRI Reactivity Depletion Decrement Uncertainty Methods

Evaluation of Neutron Physics Parameters and Reactivity Coefficients for Sodium Cooled Fast Reactors

Idaho National Laboratory Reactor Analysis Applications of the Serpent Lattice Physics Code

Available online at ScienceDirect. Energy Procedia 71 (2015 )

NEUTRONIC CALCULATION SYSTEM FOR CANDU CORE BASED ON TRANSPORT METHODS

VALIDATION OF BATAN'S STANDARD 3-D DIFFUSION CODE, BAT AN-3DIFF, ON THE FIRST CORE OF RSG GAS. Liem Peng Hong"

CONFORMITY BETWEEN LR0 MOCK UPS AND VVERS NPP PRV ATTENUATION

Fundamentals of Nuclear Power. Original slides provided by Dr. Daniel Holland

Development of depletion models for radionuclide inventory, decay heat and source term estimation in discharged fuel

Thermal Hydraulic Considerations in Steady State Design

NEUTRONIC ANALYSIS STUDIES OF THE SPALLATION TARGET WINDOW FOR A GAS COOLED ADS CONCEPT.

Control Rod Calibration and Worth Calculation for Optimized Power Reactor 1000 (OPR-1000) Using Core Simulator OPR1000

SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF ALLEGRO MOX CORE. Bratislava, Iľkovičova 3, Bratislava, Slovakia

Dynamic Analysis on the Safety Criteria of the Conceptual Core Design in MTR-type Research Reactor

Prediction of the Material Composition of the VVER-type Reactor Burned Pellet with Use of Neutron-Physical Codes

APPLICATION OF THE COUPLED THREE DIMENSIONAL THERMAL- HYDRAULICS AND NEUTRON KINETICS MODELS TO PWR STEAM LINE BREAK ANALYSIS

Coupled Neutronics Thermalhydraulics LC)CA Analysis

Neutronic Issues and Ways to Resolve Them. P.A. Fomichenko National Research Center Kurchatov Institute Yu.P. Sukharev JSC Afrikantov OKBM,

Reactivity Effect of Fission and Absorption

Investigation of falling control rods in deformed guiding tubes in nuclear reactors using multibody approaches

ANALYSIS OF THE OECD MSLB BENCHMARK WITH THE COUPLED NEUTRONIC AND THERMAL-HYDRAULICS CODE RELAP5/PARCS

DOE NNSA B&W Y-12, LLC Argonne National Lab University of Missouri INR Pitesti. IAEA Consultancy Meeting Vienna, August 24-27, 2010

TRANSMUTATION OF CESIUM-135 WITH FAST REACTORS

Energy. on this world and elsewhere. Instructor: Gordon D. Cates Office: Physics 106a, Phone: (434)

Study of Burnup Reactivity and Isotopic Inventories in REBUS Program

Transcription:

«CALCULATION OF ISOTOPE BURN-UP AND CHANGE IN EFFICIENCY OF ABSORBING ELEMENTS OF WWER-1000 CONTROL AND PROTECTION SYSTEM DURING BURN-UP». O.A. Timofeeva, K.U. Kurakin FSUE EDO «GIDROPRESS», Podolsk, Russia ABSTRACT The report deals with fast and thermal neutron flows distribution in structural elements of WWER-1000 FA and AR, determination of absorbing isotope burn-up and worth variation in WWER reactor control and protection system rods. Simulation of absorber rod burn-up is provided using code package SAPFIR_95&RC_WWER allowing detailed description of the core segment spatial model. Maximum burn-up of absorbing rods and respective worth variation of control and protection system rods is determined on the basis of a number of calculations considering known characteristics of fuel cycles. 1 INTRODUCTION Designs of fuel assembly (FA) and absorber rod (AR) for WWER type reactors of new generation require correct calculation of operating conditions parameters. This is a requirement of new methods elaboration and application of modern high-accuracy program packages. WWER-1000 FA has some parts significantly varied in structure and functions. Thus, this is the problem of geometry assigned to consider essentially important medium components for neutron flux distribution. WWER-1000 control and protection system members represent a bundle of absorbing rods moving within special channels inside FA. The absorbing rod is a leak-tight cladding filled with absorbing material. The calculation of neutron flux density onto a steel end-piece retaining absorbing material within the leak-tight clad is an important element for AR safety assurance under operating conditions specified.

AR worth variation when using boron carbide is mainly caused by radial burning of Boron-10. The products of boron interaction with neutrons practically do not absorb neutrons. Non-uniformity of neutron absorption results in re-distribution of isotope structure of absorbing compositions over AR radius. Correct calculation of FA and AR neutron-physics in thermal nuclear reactor cells (considering neutron microstructure distribution in non-uniform grids and delayed neutrons redistribution in case of moderator non-uniform distribution and fuel burn-up) is possible only using the codes with detailed simulation of neutron spatial-power distribution on the basis of detailed libraries of isotope cross-sections. The requirements of the problem are satisfied by code SAPFIR _95 [1]. 2 CALCULATION PROCEDURE DESCRIPTION Main input parameters - WWER-1000 FA and Control Protection System (CPS) AR geometry and structure are presented in Tables 1,2 and Figures 1, 2. Operation of CPS AR absorbing element is considered under the conditions of emergency protection (AR tip is above the fuel) and automatic control (AR is partially submerged into the core). Table 1 FA parameters Parameter Value Specific thermal power, W/cm 3 107,5 Coolant average temperature, С 315 Core FA pitch, m 0,236 Fuel rod number in FA, pcs. 312 Fuel rod grid pitch, m 12,75*10-3 Height of fuel stack (in cold state), m 3,53 Table 2 WWER-1000 FA absorbing element parameters Parameter Value Number of absorbing elements in CPS AR, pcs. 18 Absorbing material stack height, m 3,53 Absorbing material density, kg/m 3 1,7*10 3 Only operating CPS CR group is inserted into the core during fuel burn-up cycles. The basic number of absorbing rods is withdrawn from the core during reactor operation and works under the mode of emergency protection. Thus absorbing elements withdrawn from the core are in the area of upper end-plate reflector, and the range of absorbing element position uncertainty in this area is such that neutron flux density and the value of absorbing isotope burn-up in limiting positions of this range can vary significantly.

Such significant variation of absorbing element operating conditions in WWER reactor core requires elaboration of several representative calculational models. Therefore individual geometrical model of the core segment is described for each specific problem of spatial - power neutron distribution in the initial data to code SAPFIR_95. Assumption of two-dimensional model with the conditions of reflection in the boundaries is sufficient for calculation of CPS AR absorbing isotope burn-up in the fuel area. Three-dimensional calculated volume with various axial properties is simulated for the absorbing rods withdrawn from the core. Segment dimensions are up to 130 cm in height, including FA head structure components, the lower (fuel) part is a source of neutrons, and upper - reflector. The conditions of reflection or neutron translation are assigned on segment boundaries. Neutron leak is simulated by black absorber assigned near segment surface. Two-dimensional geometrical model is given in Figure 3. FA three-dimensional geometrical models with the absorbing element for emergency protection conditions is given in Figure 4. Basic calculation of neutron spatial - power distribution with core average parameters is provided after assignment of calculated volumes geometry. Numbers of calculations with state parameter variations are provided further. The variations of reactor state parameters are change of specific power, fuel burn-up, moderator temperature and density, content of boric acid in water, variation of CPS AR core axial position in guiding channels, etc. Determination of isotope structure variation is provided during absorbing element burnup within WWER-1000 fuel assemblies with assigned specific power density considering core power axial distribution. Fuel upper layer power is assigned for the absorber position above fuel. Specified power distribution over fuel layers typical for FA with a working group is assumed for the absorber submerged into the core. 3 CALCULATION RESULTS Relative fast and thermal neutron density variations on the absorbing element endpiece with the absorbing core lower point axial position variation above the level of fuel upper boundary and FA fuel burn-up variation are shown in Figures 5, 6. Relative neutron flux density variations on the absorbing element end-piece at absorbing part lower point position variation relatively to fuel upper boundary for the emergency protection conditions prove that CPS CR upward displacement to 8 cm from fuel lower boundary causes increase of thermal neutron flux density to absorbing element endpiece more than twice, whereas the fast neutron flux falls below 60 % of its base value. Calculation results also prove that fuel burn-up in FA with control group has significant effect onto neutron flux density value. Presented data prove that the value of fast neutron flux density to absorbing element end-piece at fuel burn-up 10 MW*day/kgU is more than 15 % above its «base» value with the same power and coolant boron concentration. Similar dependence is available for CPS CR under emergency protection conditions.

Generally, the value of neutron flux to absorbing element end-piece at each specific moment of reactor operation can be determined using previously evaluated dependencies of the parameters: burn-up, boric acid concentration, CPS CR group positions, FA power etc. For evaluation of the maximum value it is necessary to take into account possible axial power field variation as a result of xenon transient and CPS CR groups control. The increase of efficiency lowering during burn-up is typical for the absorbing element on boron carbide basis. This is caused by the decrease of absorbing element effective 10 10 diameter during «burn-up» of В. В burn-up radial distribution with various burn-ups within fuel assemblies of average power is shown in Figure 7. 10 Calculation of В burn-up along absorbing element height within 3 years with specified axial power distribution of FA with the working group (Figure 8) proves that significant concentration variation of isotope 10 В is not above fuel boundary. Use of combined absorbers containing dysprosium titanate absorber in the lower part of the absorbing element and boron carbide absorber in upper is expedient for improvement of absorbing properties in the lower part of absorbing element. Long-term keeping of sufficient absorbance because of slow burn-up of absorbing element dysprosium isotopes due to their reproduction and insignificant absorber swelling in high neutron fluxes allow to increase WWER-1000 CPS CR service life to three years in the working group and to 10 years in emergency protection groups. 4 CONCLUSION Provided analysis of neutron flux distribution along FA height and burn-up of boron carbide absorbing element within WWER-1000 fuel assemblies proves: - variation of absorbing element position respectively to fuel upper boundary with CPS groups position under emergency protection mode has a significant effect on neutron flux density and spectrum of neutrons in the end-piece area. CPS CR upward displacement to 8 cm from fuel lower boundary results in more than twice increase of thermal neutron flux density to the absorbing element end-piece; - the value of neutron flux on absorbing element end-piece for a specified power range depends on FA power, burn-up depth, coolant boric acid concentration, CPS CR group position. Generally, the value of neutron flux at each specific moment of reactor operation can be determined using previously evaluated dependencies of the parameters specified; - increase of worth lowering during burn-up is typical for the absorbing element with boron carbide. Calculation of 10 В burn-up along absorbing element height within 3 years with specified axial power distribution of FA with the working group proves that significant concentration variation of isotope 10 В is not above fuel boundary; - conservative assumption of 10 В concentration in the lower part of absorbing element (20 cm) is ~ 40 % of the initial value with maximum insertion of working group to 30 % during three years of reactor operation at nominal power;

- combined absorbers of dysprosium titanate in the lower part and boron carbide in upper are used in WWER-1000 for absorbing element absorbance improvement. Calculation analyses of absorbing material burn-up in WWER-1000 CPS components are planned to be continued using full-scale reactor model considering fuel load operation and core groups motion. 5 REFERENCES 1. V.G. Artemov, A,V. Elshin, A.S. Ivanov et al. Development of neutron-physical models for various type reactors using unified algorithms of application code package SAPFIR. Papers of the X International seminar on reactor physics. Moscow, September 2-6, 1997.

APPENDIX Absorber rod Fuel rod Central tube Moderator Figure 1 WWER-1000 reactor FA End-piece Absorbing element Figure 2 WWER-1000 reactor absorbing element Absorber rod Fuel rod Moderator Figure 3 - Two-dimensional geometrical model of FA with CPS AR in 60 symmetry sector

Holddown springs Absorbing element Fuel rod gas collector End-piece Fuel 70 31,4 8 124 Figure 4 - Three-dimensional geometrical model of FA with absorbing element for EP conditions Neutron flux, relative units 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 H, cm Fast neutron flux Thermal neutron flux Figure 5 - Dependence of neutron flux to absorbing element end-piece from absorbing part lower point position along the height above fuel upper boundary level

Neutron flux, relative units 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.8 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Fuel burn-up, МWt/day*kg U Fast neutron flux Thermal neutron flux Figure 6 - Dependence of neutron flux to absorbing element end-piece from FA fuel burn-up 1.60E-02 Boron-10 isotope nuclear concentration, 10 24 /cm3 1.40E-02 1.20E-02 1.00E-02 8.00E-03 6.00E-03 4.00E-03 2.00E-03 0.00E+00-0.4-0.2 0 0.2 0.4 Absorbing element radius, cm initial concentration 2-nd operating year 1-st operating year 3-nd operating year

Figure 7 - Boron-10 burn-up over absorbing element radius B-10 isotope concentration, relative units 1.11 1.01 0.91 0.81 0.71 0.61 0.51 Fuel upper boundary 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 The distance form absorbing material lower boundary, cm Figure 8 - Distribution of В 10 concentration along absorbing element height respectively to absorbing rod lower boundary (with working group maximum insertion to 30 %) after three operating years