Morse-Bott Framework for the 4-dim SW-Equations

Similar documents
Pin (2)-monopole theory I

Mathematical Research Letters 2, (1995) A VANISHING THEOREM FOR SEIBERG-WITTEN INVARIANTS. Shuguang Wang

Instability of Reducible Critical Points of the Seiberg-Witten Functional

Scalar curvature and the Thurston norm

Hyperkähler geometry lecture 3

INSTANTON MODULI AND COMPACTIFICATION MATTHEW MAHOWALD

SPECTRAL ASYMMETRY AND RIEMANNIAN GEOMETRY

LECTURE 10: THE ATIYAH-GUILLEMIN-STERNBERG CONVEXITY THEOREM

Lecture 4: Harmonic forms

Quantising noncompact Spin c -manifolds

Index theory on manifolds with corners: Generalized Gauss-Bonnet formulas

ORIENTABILITY AND REAL SEIBERG-WITTEN INVARIANTS

The topology of symplectic four-manifolds

Morse theory and stable pairs

DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY AND THE QUATERNIONS. Nigel Hitchin (Oxford) The Chern Lectures Berkeley April 9th-18th 2013

MONOPOLES AND LENS SPACE SURGERIES

Broken pencils and four-manifold invariants. Tim Perutz (Cambridge)

k=0 /D : S + S /D = K 1 2 (3.5) consistently with the relation (1.75) and the Riemann-Roch-Hirzebruch-Atiyah-Singer index formula

LECTURE 6: J-HOLOMORPHIC CURVES AND APPLICATIONS

Donaldson Invariants and Moduli of Yang-Mills Instantons

Einstein Metrics, Minimizing Sequences, and the. Differential Topology of Four-Manifolds. Claude LeBrun SUNY Stony Brook

Adiabatic Paths and Pseudoholomorphic Curves

Notes by Maksim Maydanskiy.

L6: Almost complex structures

SYMPLECTIC MANIFOLDS, GEOMETRIC QUANTIZATION, AND UNITARY REPRESENTATIONS OF LIE GROUPS. 1. Introduction

MORSE HOMOLOGY. Contents. Manifolds are closed. Fields are Z/2.

Spectral applications of metric surgeries

L 2 Geometry of the Symplectomorphism Group

Periodic-end Dirac Operators and Positive Scalar Curvature. Daniel Ruberman Nikolai Saveliev

Riemannian Curvature Functionals: Lecture III

Classifying complex surfaces and symplectic 4-manifolds

Transparent connections

Hermitian vs. Riemannian Geometry

Dirac Operator. Göttingen Mathematical Institute. Paul Baum Penn State 6 February, 2017

Instanton counting, Donaldson invariants, line bundles on moduli spaces of sheaves on rational surfaces. Lothar Göttsche ICTP, Trieste

DIFFERENTIAL FORMS, SPINORS AND BOUNDED CURVATURE COLLAPSE. John Lott. University of Michigan. November, 2000

Lagrangian Intersection Floer Homology (sketch) Chris Gerig

A Crash Course of Floer Homology for Lagrangian Intersections

Minimal submanifolds: old and new

Changing sign solutions for the CR-Yamabe equation

Two simple ideas from calculus applied to Riemannian geometry

Survey of Taubes P SL(2, C) connections on 3-manifolds with L 2 bounds on curvature

Geometric control and dynamical systems

SYMPLECTIC GEOMETRY: LECTURE 5

Morse homology of RP n

Morse Theory for Lagrange Multipliers

An observation concerning uniquely ergodic vector fields on 3-manifolds. Clifford Henry Taubes

SELF-ADJOINTNESS OF SCHRÖDINGER-TYPE OPERATORS WITH SINGULAR POTENTIALS ON MANIFOLDS OF BOUNDED GEOMETRY

ON SEIBERG WITTEN EQUATIONS ON SYMPLECTIC 4 MANIFOLDS

η = (e 1 (e 2 φ)) # = e 3

An extremal eigenvalue problem for surfaces with boundary

Bifurcation and symmetry breaking in geometric variational problems

TRANSVERSAL DIRAC OPERATORS ON DISTRIBUTIONS, FOLIATIONS, AND G-MANIFOLDS LECTURE NOTES

arxiv:math/ v1 [math.dg] 4 Feb 2003 Nikolay Tyurin

L19: Fredholm theory. where E u = u T X and J u = Formally, J-holomorphic curves are just 1

Morse Theory and Applications to Equivariant Topology

Hard Lefschetz Theorem for Vaisman manifolds

Introduction to the Baum-Connes conjecture

Quantising proper actions on Spin c -manifolds

BRST and Dirac Cohomology

Euler Characteristic of Two-Dimensional Manifolds

Critical metrics on connected sums of Einstein four-manifolds

Adiabatic limits and eigenvalues

HYPERKÄHLER MANIFOLDS

THE GEOMETRY OF B-FIELDS. Nigel Hitchin (Oxford) Odense November 26th 2009

Introduction to Index Theory. Elmar Schrohe Institut für Analysis

The Dirac-Ramond operator and vertex algebras

EXISTENCE THEORY FOR HARMONIC METRICS

THE EXISTENCE PROBLEM

LECTURE 5: COMPLEX AND KÄHLER MANIFOLDS

AN OPEN FOUR-MANIFOLD HAVING NO INSTANTON

Infinitesimal Einstein Deformations. Kähler Manifolds

Manifolds with holonomy. Sp(n)Sp(1) SC in SHGAP Simon Salamon Stony Brook, 9 Sep 2016

J-holomorphic curves in symplectic geometry

Embedded contact homology and its applications

Lecture III: Neighbourhoods

Poincaré Duality Angles on Riemannian Manifolds with Boundary

THE GENUS OF EMBEDDED SURFACES IN THE PROJECTIVE PLANE. P. B. Kronheimer and T. S. Mrowka

The exceptional holonomy groups and calibrated geometry

MONOPOLE CLASSES AND PERELMAN S INVARIANT OF FOUR-MANIFOLDS

The Ricci Flow Approach to 3-Manifold Topology. John Lott

fy (X(g)) Y (f)x(g) gy (X(f)) Y (g)x(f)) = fx(y (g)) + gx(y (f)) fy (X(g)) gy (X(f))

PU(2) MONOPOLES, I: REGULARITY, UHLENBECK COMPACTNESS, AND TRANSVERSALITY 1 PAUL M. N. FEEHAN AND THOMAS G. LENESS

OPEN PROBLEMS IN NON-NEGATIVE SECTIONAL CURVATURE

GEOMETRIC QUANTIZATION

An Invitation to Geometric Quantization

GAUGE-FIXING CONSTANT SCALAR CURVATURE EQUATIONS ON RULED MANIFOLDS AND THE FUTAKI INVARIANTS

Spin(10,1)-metrics with a parallel null spinor and maximal holonomy

Donaldson and Seiberg-Witten theory and their relation to N = 2 SYM

Self-intersections of Closed Parametrized Minimal Surfaces in Generic Riemannian Manifolds

Linear connections on Lie groups

arxiv:hep-th/ v3 25 Jan 1999

Invariance Theory, the Heat Equation, and the Atiyah-Singer Index Theorem

Hamiltonian Systems of Negative Curvature are Hyperbolic

Drawing: Prof. Karl Heinrich Hofmann

KODAIRA DIMENSION OF LEFSCHETZ FIBRATIONS OVER TORI

Introduction to Continuous Dynamical Systems

Higgs Bundles and Character Varieties

Complex manifolds, Kahler metrics, differential and harmonic forms

Exercises in Geometry II University of Bonn, Summer semester 2015 Professor: Prof. Christian Blohmann Assistant: Saskia Voss Sheet 1

Transcription:

Morse-Bott Framework for the 4-dim SW-Equations Celso M. Doria UFSC - Depto. de Matemática august/2010 Figure 1: Ilha de Santa Catarina Figure 2: Floripa research partially supported by FAPESC 2568/2010-2 1

1 Introduction Let (X, g) be a closed riemannian 4-manifold. The space of spin c structures on X is spin c (X) = {c = α + β H 2 (X, Z) H 1 (X, Z 2 ) w 2 (X) = β mod 2}. For each c Spin c (X), c (S c, L c ) 1. S c (spinor bundle): S c = S c + Sc, ±-spinors. 2. L c (determinant bundle) such that c 1 (L c ) = α. Fix c spin c (X): 1. A c is the space of U 1 -connections on L c, 2. Γ(S c + ) is the space of sections of S c +, 2

3. G c = Map(X, U 1 ) is the gauge group acting on C c = A c S + c by g.(a, φ) = (A + 2g 1 dg, g 1 φ). F ix Gc = {(A, 0) C c }. For all (A, 0), the isotropy group is U 1 = {g : X U 1 g is constant}. 4. The moduli space B c = C c /G c. B c F ix Gc is a smooth -manifold. The monopole (SW c )-equations on X are F + A = σ(φ) D + A φ = 0, + σ :Γ(Sc ) End 0 (S c ) Ω 2 +(X, ir) σ(φ) = φ φ φ 2 2 I. (1) Definition: Let M c be the space of solutions for the SW c -eq. (i) (A, φ) M c is an irreducible SW c -monopole if φ 0. (ii) otherwise it is reducible (singular points for the G c -action - isotropy is U 1 ). remarks: (1) M c {φ Γ(S + c ) φ 0} =, but for a finite set of classes c spin c named basic classes. The irreducible SW c -monopoles are the ones which matter for the applications in smooth topology. Question: Find a necessary or a sufficient condition for the existence of a SW c -monopole on a smooth manifold. 3

There are two majors theorems about this issue; Thrm 1 (Witten) φ 2 sup x X {0, k g (x)}. So, if k g 0, then φ = 0. Thrm 2 (Taubes) X is symplectic and c is the canonical class, so there exists an unique solution (A, φ) B c, φ 0. The space M c has the following properties: 1. it is a compact, smooth, orientable manifold away from the singular set 2. dim(m c ) = 1 4 [α2 (2χ(X) + 3σ(X)]. Exploring the topology of M c, the 4-dim topologist developed a black-box in order to distinguish smooth structures on X. 4

2 Variational Formulation Fix c spin c. Consider SW c : C c R given by SW c (A, φ) = where k g = scalar curvature of (X, g). Facts X { 1 2 F + A 2 + A φ 2 + k g 4 φ 2 + 1 8 φ 4 }dv g, (2) 1. solutions for the SW-equations are stable critical points for the SW c -functional. 2. the functional is well defined on C c because, in dimension n=4, there is the Sobolev embeddings L 4 L 1,2. 3. SW c is gauge invariant SW c : B c R 4. SW c : B c R satisfies the Palais-Smale condition. 5. Euler-Lagrange equations for SW c are d F A + d φ 2 = 0, (3) A φ + φ 2 +k g φ = 0,. (4) 4 For every c spin c, the minimum is achieved in B c. Reducible Solutions if (A, 0) solves eqt s. 5 and 6 then d F A = 0. Therefore, F A is a harmonic 2-form (α = 1 2πi [F A]), Proposition The space of reducible solutions is diffeomorphic to the Jacobian torus J X = H1 (X, R) H 1 (X, Z) S1 b 1(X)... S 1. ( SW c JX is constant) 5

Proposition B c retracts into J X. Moreover, π k (B c, b 0 ) = H 1 (S k, Z) H 1 (X, Z) = H k (J X, Z). Question: Find a condition for J X to be an unstable critical point of SW c. Question: Is the Morse-Bott index of J X finite? 3 Pertubed SW-Functional η Ω 2 +(X, ir), dη = 0. The perturbed SWc η -eq are F + A η = σ(φ), D + A φ = 0. 1. SW η c : C c R, SWc η (A, φ) = X X { 1 2 F + A 2 + A φ 2 + 1 4 k g φ 2 + 1 8 φ 4 }dv g ] [< F +A σ(φ), η > +12 η 2 dv g. 2. the functional SWc η : C c R is gauge invariant. 3. It follows from the identity SWc η (A, φ) = { D A φ 2 + F + A σ(φ) η 2 }dx, that a SW η c -monopole is a stable critical point. X 6

4. The Euler-Lagrange equations for the SW η c -functional are d F A d η + d φ 2 = 0, (5) A φ + φ 2 +k g φ + η.φ = 0,. (6) 4 5. (Main Estimate) If (A, φ) is a solution for the SW η c -functional, then φ η + 4 η 2 k g. (7) 6. SW η c -functional satisfies Palais-Smale Condition. 7

3.1 η-reducible Solutions 1. there exists finite number of η-basic classes α Spin c (X). 2. If (A, 0) is a solution for the E-L equations, then d F A = d η. (8) Proposition 3.1.1. Assume η Ω 2 +(X, ir) is closed. d ω = d η has a unique solution such that dw = 0. So, the equation Proof. The equation d F A = d η implies F A = dd η. Because Imag(d) is orthogonal to the harmonic subspace H, the last equation admits an unique solution in H. Let ω Ω 2 (X, ir) be such solution, so d dw + dd w = dd η d(w η) 2 L + 2 d (w η) 2 L2= 0. (9) Hence, dw = 0 and d w = d η. Proposition 3.1.2. Let θ Ω 1 (X, ir) and b 1 (X) = dim R H 1 (X, Z). The space of solutions for d F A = d η, module the G c -action, is diffeomorphic to the Jacobian Torus J X = H1 (X, R) H 1 (X, Z) Rb 1(X) /Z b 1(X). 8

3.2 2nd - Variation Formula The linear operator H : T (A,φ) C c T (A,φ) C c induced by the bilinear form H SW (A,φ)((θ, V ), (Λ, W )) =< (θ, V ), H(Λ, W ) > is a hermitian bounded operator because the induced quadratic form is bounded; < (θ, V ), H(θ, V ) >= dθ 2 + θ(φ) 2 + 2. < A φ, θ(v ) > + + 2 < A V, θ(φ) > + A V 2 + + k g+ φ 2. V 2 + 1 4 2 < φ, V >2 + < η.v, V >. At (A, 0), < (θ, V ), H(θ, V ) >= dθ 2 + A V 2 + k g 4. V 2 + < η.v, V >. By defining the linear operator L A,η (V ) = A V + k g V + η.v, (10) 4 H is writen at (A, 0) as ( ) d H = d 0, (11) 0 L A,η 9

3.3 The Morse-Bott Index of Reducible Solutions The tangent space to the orbit O (A,φ) = {g.(a, φ) g G c }, at (A, φ), is T (A,φ) O (A,φ) = Imag(T ), where T : Ω 0 (X, ir) Ω 1 (X, ir) Γ(S + c ), T (λ) = (dλ, λ.φ). Since T has closed range the local slice for the space B c, at (A, φ), is given by Ker(T ); T : Ω 1 (X, ir) Γ(S + c ) Ω 0 (X, ir), T (θ, V ) = d θ < V, φ >. So, ker(t ) = ker(d ) φ, d : Ω 1 Ω 0. Because (d ) 2 = 0, it can be further decomposed into ker(d : Ω 1 Ω 0 ) = imag(d : Ω 2 Ω 1 ) H 1, where H 1 = {θ Ω 1 (X, ir) dθ = d θ = 0} is the subspace of harmonic 1-forms and is also the tangent space to the Jacobian torus J X at (A, 0). Therefore, ker(h) = T (A,0) J X ker(l A,η ). The Morse-Bott index of (A, 0) J X is equal to the dimension of the largest negative eigenspace of the operator L A,η. Let V λ T (A,0) A c G Γ (S + c ) be the eigenspace associated to the eigenvalue λ. Since L A is an elliptic operator, V λ has finite dimension for all λ; 10

Proposition 3.3.1. [D-] The Morse index of a redutible solution (A, 0) is finite. Proof. Because L A is an elliptic, self-adjoint operator and its lower eigenvalue λ l is bounded below by [ ( ) ] A V 2 + kg η V 2 dv X 4 g inf V Γ(S c + ) V X 2 dv g λ l, From the spectral theory, the spectrum of L A has the following features; (i) discrete, (ii) each eigenvalue has finite multiplicity, (iii) there are but a finite number of eigenvalues below any given number. Proposition 3.3.2. [D-] There exists ν Ω 2 + such that ker(l A,ν ) = {0}. 11

4 Kronheimer-Mrowka Blow-Up B c is not a manifold Let V = Γ(S + c ), S(V ) = {φ V ; φ = 1} f σ :A c (0, ) S(V ) A c (V {0}), f σ (A, t, φ) = (A, tφ) f σ diffeo Now, define the space C σ c = [A c (V {0})] f [A c [0, ) S(V )], C σ c = A c S(V ) (12) Note that (f σ ) 1 (0) = C σ c. Gauge Action 1. G c acts freely on Cc σ by the action g.(a, s, φ) = (A + 2g 1 dg, s, g 1 φ) 2. U 1 = {g G c g constant} acts freely on Cc σ = {A} S(V ). 3. Therefore, Bc σ = Cc σ /G c is a manifold and B σ c = (A c /G c ) CP htpy J X CP. Consider the SW σ c -equations F + A s2 σ(φ) = 0 D + A φ = 0. 12

Definition: SW σ c : B σ c R given by SWc σ (A, s, φ) = = F + A 2 2 X X [ ] 1 2 F + A s2 σ(φ) 2 + D + A φ 2 dv g = s 2 < F + A, σ(φ) > +s4 8 φ 4 + < φ, A φ + k g 4 φ + 1 2 F + A.φ > dv g }{{} DA 2 So, SWc σ (A, s, φ) = Therefore, X [ F + ] A 2 s 2 < F + A, σ(φ) > +s4 2 8 φ 4 + < φ, (D + A )2 φ > dv g 1. if (A, s, φ) is a critical point of SW σ c, then (A, sφ) is a critical point of SW c. 2. if (A, 0, φ) A c {0} S(V ) is a critical point of SW σ c, then it satisfies the eq. d F A = 0 D A φ = 0, D A = D A D+ A Let r : B σ c J X be a retraction and f : J X R be a Morse function. Define g = f r and perturb the functional; (SW σ c ) g (A, s, φ) = SW σ c (A, s, φ) + g(a, sφ). (re- The critical point set C decomposes into a boundary component C ducibles) and a interior component C 0 (irreducibles). Moreover, C = C 0 C is finite. 13

There two kind of critical points in B σ c : (i) C s = -stables (ii) C u = -unstables. C = C 0 C = C 0 C s C u. Definition: 1. Consider the free groups C 0 = a C 0Z < a >, C s = a C sz < a > C u = a C uz < a >. 2. C 0 k = ind(a)=k Z < a >, C s k = ind(a)=k Z < a > C u k = ind(a)=k Z < a >. 3. Č k = C 0 k C s k, Ĉ k = C 0 k C s k, C = C s k C u k+1 Now consider the free generated groups Ĉ k = C 0 k C u k, Č k = C 0 k C s k, Ck = C s k C u k+1 So far, there are technical difficulties to define the boundary operator. Indeed, Bc σ being non compact the number of gradient flow lines connecting critical points a, b, ind(a) ind(b) = 1, may be infinite. 2 = 0? 14

Figure 3: X-Ray * * * 15

Hong-Schabrun 16