OECD Conceptual Framework for Testing and Assessment of Endocrine Disrupters (as revised in 2012)

Similar documents
Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Économiques Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development

Screening and prioritisation of substances of concern: A regulators perspective within the JANUS project

QMRF# Title. number and title in JRC QSAR Model Data base 2.0 (new) number and title in JRC QSAR Model Data base 1.0

Priority Setting of Endocrine Disruptors Using QSARs

DATA REQUIREMENTS Checklist and File Index for HS Applications

8 th BioDetectors. Applications of bioassays to prioritize chemical food safety issues. Maricel Marin-Kuan

LIFE-EDESIA: the role of functional assays to implement the substitution principle for EDCs. Stefano Lorenzetti

Project Summary. Title: Effect of Clean and Polluted Groundwater on Reproduction and Development of Daphnia

QSAR APPLICATION TOOLBOX ADVANCED TRAINING WORKSHOP. BARCELONA, SPAIN 3-4, June 2015 AGENDA

Adverse Outcome Pathways in Ecotoxicology Research

Investigating Potamopyrgus antipodarum as suitable test species for ecotoxicology testing of surface water

Exploration of alternative methods for toxicity assessment of pesticide metabolites

21st century Ecotoxicology and Human toxicology: Applications and perspectives for the use of OMICs data

Read-Across or QSARs?

Biology 5868 ID Exam 2 April 6, 2007

Section I Assessing Chemicals

Extrapolating New Approaches into a Tiered Approach to Mixtures Risk Assessment

Annex IX: Risks for PolyChlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs)

Ecorisk Dilemma. ES/RP 532 Applied Environmental Toxicology. EPA Approach. EPA Objective. Hazard Identification. Hazard ID

ECOTOX: A Foundation for Extrapolation

Section II Assessing Polymers

Materials Approach using the Toyograph CAS Number Approach

How to decide whether a substance is a polymer or not and how to proceed with the relevant registration

Madhya Pradesh Bhoj Open University. Bhopal M.sc Zoology Final Year

Assessment and Regulation of Nanomaterials under the European Biocides Regulation Isabel Günther

Ecotoxicological evaluation of sediments contaminated by waste coal by in vivo and in vitro bioassays

Global Harmonization System:

OECD QSAR Toolbox v.3.3

Adverse effects of environmentally relevant dietary mercury exposure in larvae of the southern leopard frog, Rana sphenocephala

SADA General Information

Regulatory use of (Q)SARs under REACH

RSC Publishing. Principles and Applications. In Silico Toxicology. Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, Edited by

Ecotoxicity testing for an environmentally safer-by-design nanotechnology industry : an overview

OECD QSAR Toolbox v.3.4

Introduction to Ecotoxicology. Ludek Blaha, Jakub Hofman, Klara Hilscherova & co.

Purpose. Sub-Committee of Experts on the Transport of Dangerous Goods. Forty-ninth session

Chemical Control Legislation In Japan

What larval culture of Diadema antillarum

The Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS)

OECD QSAR Toolbox v.3.4

OECD QSAR Toolbox v.4.0. Tutorial on how to predict Skin sensitization potential taking into account alert performance

SIAM 23, October 2006 SIDS INITIAL ASSESSMENT PROFILE

Case study: Category consistency assessment in Toolbox for a list of Cyclic unsaturated hydrocarbons with respect to repeated dose toxicity.

7/8/2013. What is GHS?

OECD Environmental Health and Safety Publications. Series on Testing and Assessment

Good Read-Across Practice 1: State of the Art of Read-Across for Toxicity Prediction. Mark Cronin Liverpool John Moores University England

Characterization Methods of Manufactured Nanomaterials for EHS Studies

Predictive Ecotoxicology Workshop

Appendix R7-2 for nanomaterials applicable to Chapter R7c Endpoint specific guidance

Proposals to address issues from the programme of work for the practical classification issues correspondence group

Environmental Risk Assessment of Nanomedicines

RISK MANAGEMENT OF NANOMATERIALS

Use of (Q)SAR and read across for assessment of genotoxicity of pesticides metabolites

Integrated Approaches to Testing and Assessment in Developmental Toxicology

OECD QSAR Toolbox v.3.3. Predicting skin sensitisation potential of a chemical using skin sensitization data extracted from ECHA CHEM database

Introduction to the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS)

OECD QSAR Toolbox v.4.1. Implementation AOP workflow in Toolbox: Skin Sensitization

Validation of the GastroPlus TM Software Tool and Applications

Assessing the Population Relevance of Endocrine-Disrupting Effects for Nontarget Vertebrates Exposed to Plant Protection Products

Environmental Toxicology of 2,4-D

The Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS) Purpose, scope and application

Summary of OSHAs New Hazard Communication Standard The Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals

Biological Read-Across: Species-Species and Endpoint- Endpoint Extrapolation

Grouping and Read-Across for Respiratory Sensitisation. Dr Steve Enoch School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences Liverpool John Moores University

Biocidal Products Committee (BPC)

OECD QSAR Toolbox v.4.1

Nano-Ecotoxicology Assessment of Potential Effects of Engineered Nanomaterials in the Environment

KATE2017 on NET beta version Operating manual

GHS Classification CONCEPT OF GHS

OECD QSAR Toolbox v.4.1. Tutorial on how to predict Skin sensitization potential taking into account alert performance

Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Economiques Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development

TOXICOLOGICAL ENDPOINTS EASILY MEASURED IN DEVELOPING ZEBRAFISH. Robert L. Tanguay Environmental and Molecular Toxicology Oregon State University

Ecotoxicological impacts of microplastics on marine organisms, including species providing a source of food

Zebrafish as a tool to study mechanisms of developmental toxicology of environmental chemicals. Jessica Legradi, P. Cenijn, R. Carvalho, J.

Spatial Analysis and Decision Assistance (SADA) Version 5. Overview. Midwestern States Risk Asssessment Symposium. University of Tennessee, Knoxville

PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF PROPOSED SIMILAR OR MODIFIED IN VITRO SKIN SENSITISATION DPRA AND ADRA TEST METHODS

Introduction to Revised K-REACH and Sub-ordinance. JunYong Yang (Chemtopia Co., Ltd.)

Product Stewardship Summary

Validation of Selected, Non-Commercial (Q)SAR Models for Estrogen Receptor and Androgen Receptor Binding

Author's personal copy

In 2012, the U.S. adopted the Globally Harmonized System for the Classification and Labelling of Chemicals, or GHS for short.

Effect-Based Tools for Monitoring and Predicting the Ecotoxicological Effects of Chemicals in the Aquatic Environment

Neurosecretion Protein hormones make on RER. Sequestered in granuels Released by exocytosis

Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals (GHS) LC-1033p Rev. 06/16

Risk Assessment Models for Nontarget and Biodiversity Impacts of GMOs

Data collection on Combined Toxicity of Multiple Chemicals for Animal Health and Ecological Risk Assessment

GHS Safety Data Sheets & Labeling System

Prediction of Estrogen Receptor Binding for 58,000 Chemicals Using an Integrated System of a Tree-Based Model with Structural Alerts

Environmental hazard and risk of nanomaterials: grouping concepts for aquatic and terrestrial toxicity

CTD General Questions and Answers

HAZARD COMMUNICATION PROGRAM 2015 UPDATE GHS AWARENESS TRAINING CSULB COE

1. What are the three general areas of the developing vertebrate limb? 2. What embryonic regions contribute to the developing limb bud?

Evidence for the Existence of Non-monotonic Dose-response: Does it or Doesn t it?

Biocidal Products Committee (BPC)

Aquaculture Biology Laboratory

Shu Shang Thesis Final May Shu Shang

ZEBRAFISH, DANIO RERIO AS A

Characterization of Chemical Interactions with the Estrogen and Androgen Steroid Hormone Receptors

Hazard Communication Standard: Safety Data Sheets

Properties criteria - BETA

Transcription:

OECD Conceptual Framework for Testing and Assessment of Endocrine Disrupters (as revised in 2012) This document presents the revised Conceptual Framework for Testing and Assessment of Endocrine Disrupters, as included in the Guidance Document 150 (Annex 1.4) published in the OECD Series on Testing and Assessment in August 2012. Very few editorial changes were necessary to be able to post it on the public website as a standalone document.

The OECD Conceptual Framework for Testing and Assessment of Endocrine Disrupters (as revised in 2012) lists the OECD Test Guidelines and standardized test methods available, under development or proposed that can be used to evaluate chemicals for endocrine disruption. The Conceptual Framework is intended to provide a guide to the tests available which can provide information for endocrine disrupters assessment but is not intended to be a testing strategy. Furthermore, this Conceptual Framework does not include evaluation of exposure; however this should be included when deciding whether further testing is needed. Further information regarding the use and interpretation of these tests is available in Guidance Document No. 150. Level 1 Existing Data and Non-Test Information Level 2 In vitro assays providing data about selected endocrine mechanism(s) / pathways(s) (Mammalian and non mammalian methods) Mammalian and non mammalian Toxicology Physical & chemical properties, e.g., MW reactivity, volatility, biodegradability All available (eco)toxicological data from standardized or non-standardized tests. Read across, chemical categories, QSARs and other in silico predictions, and ADME model predictions Estrogen or androgen receptor binding affinity Estrogen receptor transactivation (OECD TG 455 OECD TG 457) Androgen or thyroid transactivation (If/when TGs are available) Steroidogenesis in vitro (OECD TG 456) MCF-7 cell proliferation assays (ER ant/agonist) Other assays as appropriate Level 3 In vivo assays providing data about selected endocrine mechanism(s) / pathway(s) 1 Mammalian Toxicology Uterotrophic assay (OECD TG 440) Hershberger assay (OECD TG 441) 2 Non-Mammalian Toxicology Xenopus embryo thyroid signalling assay (When/if TG is available) Amphibian metamorphosis assay (OECD TG 231) Fish Reproductive Screening Assay (OECD TG 229) Fish Screening Assay (OECD TG 230) Androgenized female stickleback screen

(GD 140) Level 4 In vivo assays providing data on adverse effects on endocrine relevant endpoints 2 Repeated dose 28-day study (OECD TG 407) Repeated dose 90-day study (OECD TG 408) 1-generation reproduction toxicity study (OECD TG 415) Male pubertal assay (see GD 150, Chapter C4.3) 3 Female pubertal assay (see GD 150, Chapter C4.4) 3 Intact adult male endocrine screening assay (see GD 150, Chapter Annex 2.5) Prenatal developmental toxicity study (OECD TG 414) Chronic toxicity and carcinogenicity studies (OECD TG 451-3) Reproductive screening test (OECD TG 421 if enhanced) Combined 28-day/reproductive screening assay (OECD TG 422 if enhanced) Developmental neurotoxicity (OECD TG 426) Fish sexual development test (OECD TG 234) Fish Reproduction Partial Lifecycle Test (when/if TG is Available) Larval Amphibian Growth & Development Assay (when TG is available) Avian Reproduction Assay (OECD TG 206) Mollusc Partial Lifecycle Assays (when TG is Chironomid Toxicity Test (TG 218-219) 4 Daphnia Reproduction Test (with male induction) (OECD TG 211) 4 Earthworm Reproduction Test (OECD TG 222) 4 Enchytraeid Reproduction Test (OECD TG 220) 4 Sediment Water Lumbriculus Toxicity Test Using Spiked Sediment (OECD TG 225) 4 Predatory mite reproduction test in soil (OECD TG 226) 4 Collembolan Reproduction Test in Soil (TG OECD 232) 4 Level 5 In vivo assays providing more Extended one-generation reproductive FLCTT (Fish LifeCycle Toxicity Test) toxicity study (OECD TG 443) 5 (when TG is available) 3

comprehensive data on adverse effects on endocrine relevant endpoints over more extensive parts of the life cycle of the organism 2 2-Generation reproduction toxicity study (OECD TG 416 most recent update) Medaka Multigeneration Test (MMGT) (when TG is available) Avian 2 generation reproductive toxicity assay (when TG is available) Mysid Life Cycle Toxicity Test (when TG is Copepod Reproduction and Development Test (when TG is Sediment Water Chironomid Life Cycle Toxicity Test (OECD TG 233) 4 Mollusc Full Lifecycle Assays (when TG is Daphnia Multigeneration Assay (if TG is 1 Some assays may also provide some evidence of adverse effects. 2 Effects can be sensitive to more than one mechanism and may be due to non-ed mechanisms. 3 Depending on the guideline/protocol used, the fact that a substance may interact with a hormone system in these assays does not necessarily mean that when the substance is used it will cause adverse effects in humans or ecological systems. 4 At present, the available invertebrate assays solely involve apical endpoints which are able to respond to some endocrine disrupters and some non- EDs. Those in Level 4 are partial lifecycle tests, while those in Level 5 are full- or multiple lifecycle tests. 5 The Extended one-generation reproductive Toxicity Study (OECD TG 443) is preferable for detecting endocrine disruption because it provides an evaluation of a number of endocrine endpoints in the juvenile and adult F1, which are not included in the 2-generation study (OECD TG 416) adopted in 2001 Notes to the OECD Revised Conceptual Framework 4

Note 1: Entering at all levels and exiting at all levels is possible and depends upon the nature of existing information and needs for testing and assessment. Note 2: The assessment of each chemical should be made on a case by case basis, taking into account all available information. Note 3: The framework should not be considered as all inclusive at the present time. At levels 2, 3, 4 and 5 it includes assays that are either available or for which validation is under way. With respect to the latter, these are provisionally included. 5