Binding Theory Different types of NPs, constraints on their distribution

Similar documents
CS460/626 : Natural Language Processing/Speech, NLP and the Web

HPSG: Binding Theory

Some binding facts. Binding in HPSG. The three basic principles. Binding theory of Chomsky

Grundlagenmodul Semantik All Exercises

Personal Pronouns. First person I We Second Person You You Third Person He, She, It They. Personal Pronouns

Semantics 2 Part 1: Relative Clauses and Variables

Beliefs Mini-Story Text

INTRODUCTION TO LOGIC. Propositional Logic. Examples of syntactic claims

Hardegree, Formal Semantics, Handout of 8

Semantics and Generative Grammar. Pronouns and Variable Assignments 1. We ve seen that implicatures are crucially related to context.

WORKSHEET. Área: ingles Periodo: 1 Fecha: 26 feb al 2 Mar. Competencia: writing and grammar comprehension. Uses of the past tenses Part I

UC Berkeley, Philosophy 142, Spring 2016 John MacFarlane Philosophy 142

CAS LX 522 Syntax I Fall 2000 October 10, 2000 Week 5: Case Theory and θ Theory. θ-theory continued

Semantics and Pragmatics of NLP. SPNLP: Dynamic Semantics and Drawbacks

Introduction to Semantics. Pronouns and Variable Assignments. We ve seen that implicatures are crucially related to context.

1. Background. Task: Determine whether a given string of words is a grammatical (well-formed) sentence of language L i or not.

Semantics and Generative Grammar. Quantificational DPs, Part 3: Covert Movement vs. Type Shifting 1

E-type interpretation without E-type pronoun: How Peirce s Graphs. capture the uniqueness implication of donkey sentences

Semantics of Classical First- Order Logic

Context Free Grammars

Classical Menu of Pronouns

Introduction to Semantics. The Formalization of Meaning 1

Spring 2017 Ling 620 The Semantics of Control Infinitives: A First Introduction to De Se Attitudes

George Muller: Chapter 1 Questions

7.2. Generalizations and quantifiers Overview

The Golden Windows - Unit 3 Worksheets: Reader 2

Semantics and Pragmatics of NLP The Semantics of Discourse: Overview

Computationele grammatica

3.8.1 Sum Individuals and Discourse Referents for Sum Individuals

Spring 2017 Ling 620. An Introduction to the Semantics of Tense 1

Semantics and Generative Grammar. The Semantics of Adjectival Modification 1. (1) Our Current Assumptions Regarding Adjectives and Common Ns

Predicate Calculus. Lila Kari. University of Waterloo. Predicate Calculus CS245, Logic and Computation 1 / 59

Semantics and Pragmatics of NLP Pronouns

Proseminar on Semantic Theory Fall 2013 Ling 720 The Proper Treatment of Quantification in Ordinary English, Part 1: The Fragment of English

Topic #3 Predicate Logic. Predicate Logic

Scalar additives and their interaction with focus

Quantification in the predicate calculus

Eigenwords. a quick intro. Lyle Ungar University of Pennsylvania. Lyle Ungar, University of Pennsylvania

Gender in conditionals

Control and Tough- Movement

Andrew Carnie, Structural Relations. The mathematical properties of phrase structure trees

Logic. Readings: Coppock and Champollion textbook draft, Ch

Deductive Systems. Lecture - 3

Control and Tough- Movement

Modeling obviation in Algonquian * Carol-Rose Little & Mary Moroney. Cornell University

Quantifier Scope Constraints in ACD: Implications for the Syntax of Relative Clauses

Semantics and Generative Grammar. Quantificational DPs, Part 2: Quantificational DPs in Non-Subject Position and Pronominal Binding 1

BGS NATIONAL PUBLIC SCHOOL HULIMAVU, BANGALORE-76 Annual Examination March 2019 Subject: ENGLISH

Nicholas Nickleby A classic story by Charles Dickens Adapted by Gill Munton Series Editor: Louis Fidge

LIN1032 Formal Foundations for Linguistics

SEMANTICS OF POSSESSIVE DETERMINERS STANLEY PETERS DAG WESTERSTÅHL

Focus Dependency as Structure Sharing

Logic: Propositional Logic (Part I)

Sentence Planning 2: Aggregation

First Order Logic (FOL)

Presupposition and Montague Grammar (Krahmer 1998, Ch. 5)

Teacher Edition. alphakids. A Play About Goldilocks. Goes for a Walk. and the Three Bears Retold by Jenny Feely. Illustrated by Peter Paul Bajer

Q1. Amina is making designs with two different shapes.

Semantics I, Rutgers University Week 3-1 Yimei Xiang September 17, Predicate logic

Resting Hill - Unit 9 GulMohar: Reader 6

ECS 120 Lesson 18 Decidable Problems, the Halting Problem

Combining Montague Semantics and Discourse Representation

Hardegree, Compositional Semantics, Chapter 7: Pronouns 1 of 37. Chapter 7 Pronouns

Modality: A Standard Analysis. Modality

(7) a. [ PP to John], Mary gave the book t [PP]. b. [ VP fix the car], I wonder whether she will t [VP].

A Review of the Essentials of Extensional Semantics 1

FILL IN THE BLANKS: 3. "Now Laban had two daughters: the name of the elder was, and the name of the younger was." GENESIS 29:16

Assignment 3. Solution. 1. Give trees showing the derivations of the following sentences; show all movements.

Computational Models - Lecture 4 1

Video: Saint Bernadette Soubirous

D2: For each type 1 quantifier Q, Q acc (R) = {a : Q(aR) = 1}.

It is not the case that ϕ. p = It is not the case that it is snowing = It is not. r = It is not the case that Mary will go to the party =

CS1800: Strong Induction. Professor Kevin Gold

Artificial Intelligence

Proseminar on Semantic Theory Fall 2013 Ling 720 Problem Set on the Analysis of Quantification: Answers and Notes

First Order Logic (1A) Young W. Lim 11/18/13

Time Zones - KET Grammar

How did you see it? How can you write it? Is your expression as simplified as possible? CPM Materials modified by Mr. Deyo

a. Develop a fragment of English that contains quantificational NPs. b. Develop a translation base from that fragment to Politics+λ

Ling 98a: The Meaning of Negation (Week 5)

PIMA TALES BY HENRIETTE ROTHSCHILD KROEBER THE CREATION OF THE WOKLD

Class Notes: Tsujimura (2007), Ch. 5. Syntax (1), pp (3) a. [[akai hon]-no hyooshi] b. [akai [hon-no hyooshi]]

Explorers 4 Teacher s notes for the Comprehension Test: The Snow Queen

Spring 2017 Ling 620 Eliminating Res-Movement : An Introduction to Concept Generators

Are Spinners Really Random?

Today. Next week. Today (cont d) Motivation - Why Modal Logic? Introduction. Ariel Jarovsky and Eyal Altshuler 8/11/07, 15/11/07

INTENSIONS MARCUS KRACHT

Lecture 12 September 26, 2007

LING 106. Knowledge of Meaning Lecture 3-1 Yimei Xiang Feb 6, Propositional logic

A brief history of Chemistry. Science 9- Mr. Klasz

PRONOUN सव न म. Mishra English Study Centre BY M. K. Mishra

One day, God sent an angel named Gabriel to Nazareth to deliver an important message to a woman called Mary.

Benchmark 6.1. Subject: English Language Arts. State: New Jersey

Hybrid Logic Dependency Semantics

2) What can you expect?

Predicates, Quantifiers and Nested Quantifiers

Chapter 9: Introduction to Quantification

100 : 75 : 135 : forum.konkur.in

ACTS. You Will Be My Witnesses: Lesson 24. Running the Race. Of All the Apostles

Announcements. CS243: Discrete Structures. Propositional Logic II. Review. Operator Precedence. Operator Precedence, cont. Operator Precedence Example

Transcription:

Binding Theory Different types of Ps, constraints on their distribution Ling 322 Read Syntax, Ch. 5 (Lecture notes based on Andrew Carnie s notes) 1

Different Types of Ps R-expressions An P that gets its meaning by referring to an entity in the world. Examples: George Bush, Travis, a teddy bear, purple shoes (1) The woman in the blue suit is talking to John. Anaphors An P that obligatorily gets its meaning from another P in the sentence. Examples: myself, yourself, himself, herself, itself, oneself, ourselves, yourselves, themselves, each other (2) a. The boy himself. b. The girls talked to each other. 2

Different Types of Ps (cont.) Pronouns An P that may (but need not) get its meaning from another word in the sentence. It can also get its meaning from a noun phrase previously mentioned in the discourse, or by context. Examples: I, me, you, he, him, she, her, it, one, we, us, they, them, his, her, our, my its, your, their (3) a. Art said that he played basketball. b. She is not in her office. It turns out that the distribution of different types of Ps are each subject to a certain set of syntactic restrictions. A theory that addresses this issue is called Binding Theory. 3

Some Terminology Antecedent: an P that gives its meaning to a pronoun or an anaphor. (4) a. The boy himself. b. The girls talked to each other. Indexing: means of representing the meaning of an P. e.g, i, j, k, l,... Each index (plural: indices) represents a different reference. If two Ps refer to the same entity, then they get the same index. If not, they get different indices. (5) a. [Colin] i gave [Andrea] j [a basketball] k. b. [The boy] i [himself] i. c. [Art] i said [he] i played [basketball] j. d. [Art] i said [he] j played [basketball] k. Co-indexing: Two Ps that have the same index are said to be co-indexed. Two Ps that are co-indexed are said to co-refer (i.e., refer to the same entity in the world). 4

Binding Conditions for Anaphors An anaphor requires an antecedent (a co-indexed P) somewhere in the sentence. (6) a. [The boy] i himself i. b. * [The boy] i herself j. What structural relation must be obtained between an anaphor and its antecedent? Trial 1: (7) a. [The boy] i himself i. b. * Himself i [the boy] i. Trial 2: (8) a. [Mary s brother] i himself i. b. * [Mary] i s brother herself i. 5

Binding Conditions for Anaphors (cont.) What structural relation is involved between an anaphor and its antecedent that distinguishes the two below? * P i P P P P P i P i P i brother brother Mary s himself Mary s herself 6

Binding Conditions for Anaphors (cont.) An anaphor must have a c-commanding antecedent. Binding A binds B iff (i) A c-commands B, and (ii) A and B are co-indexed. Watch out! Binding is not the same as co-indexing. Binding Principle A: (to be revised) An anaphor must be bound. That is, in English, an anaphor must be c-commanded and co-indexed by an antecedent. QUESTIO: How does Principle A rule out the following example? (9) * Himself i [the boy] i. 7

Binding Conditions for Anaphors (cont.) Locality restrictions on anaphor binding (10) a. Mary i thinks that John j himself j. b. * Mary i thinks that herself i John. c. * Mary i thinks that John j herself i. * * P i P P i P P i P Mary thinks C Mary thinks C Mary thinks C that P j P that P i P that P j P P j P j P i John herself John himself John herself 8

Binding Conditions for Anaphors (cont.) An anaphor must be bound in its own clause. Binding domain The lowest clause containing the anaphor. Binding Principle A Structural restriction: The anaphor must be c-commanded by a co-indexed P. Locality restriction: The anaphor must be c-commanded by a co-indexed P within its own clause. = An anaphor must be bound in its binding domain. 9

Binding Conditions for Pronouns Trial 1: (11) a. [Mary] i s brother her i. b. * [Mary s brother] i him i. * P P P i P P i P i P P i brother brother Mary s her Mary s him 10

Binding Conditions for Pronouns (cont.) Trial 2: (12) a. John i thinks that Mary j will him i. b. * John i thinks that Mary j will her j. * P i P P i P John thinks C John thinks C that P T P that P j T P will P i will P j Mary Mary him her 11

Binding Conditions for Pronouns (cont.) A pronoun must not be c-commanded by a co-indexed P within its own clause. Free ot bound. Binding Principle B A pronoun must be free in its binding domain. 12

Binding Conditions for R-expressions Trial 1: (13) a. John i believes that he i is the happiest. b. * He i believes that John i is the happiest. c. * He i says that Mary thinks that John i is the happiest. * * P i P P i P P i P John he he believes that he i... believes that John i... says C that P P Mary thinks that John i... 13

Binding Conditions for R-expressions (cont.) Trial 2: (14) a. His i brother John i. b. Her i brother thinks that Mary i is intelligent. P P P P P i his brother P i John P i her brother thinks that Mary i is intetelligent 14

Binding Conditions for R-expressions (cont.) An R-expression can have an antecedent as long as it is not c-commanded by it. Binding Principle C An R-expression must be free. The Binding Principles: Principle A: An anaphor must be bound in its binding domain. Principle B: A pronoun must be free in its binding domain. Principle C: An R-expressions must be free. 15

Exercise in Binding Principles Explain why the following sentences are ungrammatical: (from Carnie 2007, p. 147) 1. * Michael i loves him i. 2. * He i loves Michael i. 3. * Michael i s father j loves himself i. 4. * Michael i s father j loves him j. 5. * Susan i thinks that John should marry herself i. 6. * John thinks that Susan i should kiss her i. 16