Making Sense of Evolving Reference Frames for North America

Similar documents
Frames for the Future New Datum Definitions for Modernization of the U.S. National Spatial Reference System

Height Modernization 2013 A New Canadian Vertical Datum

NATRF 2022 AND LDP OCTOBER 11, 2017

MODERNIZATION OF THE NSRS

Geospatial Data Standards Considerations for the delivery of 2D and 3D spatial data February 2019

United States NSRS 2022: Terrestrial Reference Frames

SIRGAS: Basis for Geosciences, Geodata, and Navigation in Latin America

Geodesy on the move. Craig Allinson. Dealing with dynamic coordinate reference systems. IOGP Geodesy Subcommittee. EPUG London, November 2017

The U.S. National Spatial Reference System in 2022

NGS is Scheduled to Replace NAVD 88 and NAD 83 In 2022

Fusion of Geodesy and GIS at NOAA s National Geodetic Survey

BUILDING AN ACCURATE GIS

NGS and the Modernization of the National Spatial Reference System (NSRS)

Modernization of the National Spatial Reference System 2022 Datum. Jacksonville Chapter July 2018

The Usefulness of WADGPS Satellite Orbit and Clock Corrections for Dual-Frequency Precise Point Positioning

Publ. Astron. Obs. Belgrade No. 91 (2012), REALIZATION OF ETRF2000 AS A NEW TERRESTRIAL REFERENCE FRAME IN REPUBLIC OF SERBIA

Modern Navigation. Thomas Herring

GEOID UNDULATIONS OF SUDAN USING ORTHOMETRIC HEIGHTS COMPARED WITH THE EGM96 ANG EGM2008

GGOS Bureau for Standards and Conventions

Global & National Geodesy, GNSS Surveying & CORS Infrastructure

Fundamentals of Surveying (LE/ESSE ) Lecture 10

MSGIC Spring Mtg Denton April 23, 2014

GEOGRAPHIC COORDINATE SYSTEMS

REGIONAL REFERENCE FRAMES: THE IAG PERSPECTIVE

CHILEAN PART OF SIRGAS REFERENCE FRAME, REALIZATION, ADOPTION, MAINTENANCE AND ACTUAL STATUS. Geodesy for Planet Earth IAG 2009, Buenos Aires

An Assessment of the Accuracy of PPP in Remote Areas in Oman

Vertical Reference Frame Pacific

How significant is the dynamic component of the North American vertical datum?

New Datums: Replacing NAVD 88 and NAD 83

The National Spatial Reference System of the Future

A Glimpse at Geodetic Activities in Latin America

Semi-Dynamic Datum of Indonesia

GEODETIC NETWORK OF SAUDI ARABIA AND FIDUCIAL STATIONS. GFN OF Saudi Arabia in Based on ITRF2000 Datum

Positioning in the Pacific Islands

TOWARDS ROBUST LOCALIZATION OF RTK-GPS TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEYS 23

Positioning the Pacific: NOAA s Geospatial Activities. Juliana Blackwell, Director NOAA s National Geodetic Survey March 6, 2012

How GNSS CORS in Japan works for geodetic control and disaster mitigations

The International Terrestrial Reference System and ETRS89: Part I : General concepts

Next Generation Australian Datum. Permanent Committee on Geodesy, ICSM

ESTIMATES OF HORIZONTAL DISPLACEMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE 1999 TAIWAN EARTHQUAKE

Consideration of a Global Vertical Reference System (GVRS) in the IERS Conventions

Lecture 2. Map Projections and GIS Coordinate Systems. Tomislav Sapic GIS Technologist Faculty of Natural Resources Management Lakehead University

Intro to GIS Fall 2010 Georeferencing & Map Projections

The U.S. National Spatial Reference System in 2022

Positioning a nation for the future: Modernizing the United States National Spatial Reference System

The European Surveying Plot A surveying map of land property: A proposal and it s perspectives

U.S. Datums: Where We ve Been,

The many paths to a common ground: A comparison of transformations between GDA94 and ITRF

The Global Geodetic Observing System (GGOS) of the International Association of Geodesy (IAG)

New satellite mission for improving the Terrestrial Reference Frame: means and impacts

Constraints on Intra-Continental Strain Rates and Glacial Isostatic Adjustment from Thousands of GPS Velocities

VT State Plane. Daniel J. Martin National Geodetic Survey VT Geodetic Advisor. VSLS Conference Rutland VT April 11, 2008

Relating the Nigerian Reference Frame and AFREF

The Canadian Height Modernization Initiative. Information for British Columbia Stakeholders / Clients

Rigid Plate Transformations to Support PPP and Absolute Positioning in Africa

Modernization of National Geodetic Datum in China *

The 3-D Global Spatial Data Model: Geometrical Foundation of the Global Spatial Data Infrastructure

Geographic Information Systems class # 1 February 19, Coordinate reference systems in GIS: geodetic coordinates

Spatial Data Collection using GPS: BEST PRACTICES

The International Terrestrial Reference System and ETRS89: Part II : ITRS & ETRS89 relationship

On the Development and Implementations of the New Semi- Dynamic Datum for Indonesia

Report for 15th PCGIAP Meeting at 18th UNRCC-AP Working Group 1 Regional Geodesy

Height systems. Rudi Gens Alaska Satellite Facility

Do we need to update PNG94 to PNG2020?

From Global to National Geodetic Reference Frames: how are they connected and why are they needed?

Working Group 1. Geodetic Reference Frame. Activity Report. for. The UN-GGIM-AP Plenary Meeting

New Datums: Replacing NAVD 88 and NAD 83

LEADS. The Essential Elements of a 3-D Geographic Coordinate

Town of Chino Valley. Survey Control Network Report. mgfneerhg mc N. Willow Creek Road Prescott AZ

Your Advisor Said, Get the GPS Data and Plot it. Jeff Freymueller Geophysical University of Alaska Fairbanks

System of Geodetic Parameters Parametry Zemli 1990 PZ-90.11

Georeferencing, Map Projections, Cartographic Concepts. -Coordinate Systems -Datum

Post-Processed Precise Point Positioning: A Viable Alternative?

Modern Terrestrial Reference Systems (Part 1)

Canadian Board of Examiners for Professional Surveyors Core Syllabus Item C 6: GEODETIC POSITIONING

International boundaries on a dynamic planet issues relating to plate tectonics and reference frame changes

Strategy for the Realization of the International Height Reference System (IHRS)

The International Terrestrial Reference Frame. What is a Terrestrial Reference Frame?

EUREF Technical Note 1: Relationship and Transformation between the International and the European Terrestrial Reference Systems

A Deformation Model to support a Next Generation Australian Geodetic Datum

Beyond GEOID12: Implementing a New Vertical Datum for North America

Specification of the Baltic Sea Chart Datum 2000 (BSCD2000)

Understanding Projections for GIS

DETERMINATION OF THE STATION COORDINATES FOR QUALITY CONTROL OF THE SATELLITE LASER RANGING DATA S.

GISC3325 Spring 2011 Final Exam

Georeferencing. Place names Postal addresses Postal codes Coordinate systems (lat/long, UTM, etc.)

Global reference systems and Earth rotation

Geocentric Datum of Australia - GDA

A new transformation including deformation model for the Nordic. and Baltic countries

Contributions of Geodesy to Oceanography

RELATIVISTIC ASPECTS IN ASTRONOMICAL STANDARDS AND THE IERS CONVENTIONS

WHERE ARE YOU? Maps & Geospatial Concepts Fall 2012

Spatial Reference Systems. Introduction

Global Inverse for Surface Mass Variations, Geocenter Motion, and Earth Rheology

A Strategic Plan for Geodesy in Sweden. Mikael Lilje Lars E. Engberg Geodesy Department Lantmäteriet Sweden

Height Modernization Program in the United States: Implementing a Vertical Datum Referenced to a Gravimetric Geoid Model

4 Survey Datums. 4.1 Horizontal Datum Policy SURVEY DATUMS SEPTEMBER 2006

REFERENCING COORDINATE SYSTEMS MAP PROJECTIONS GEOREFERENCING

Changes are coming NGS NSRS Modernization Are you Ready?

Establishment of a Global Absolute Gravity Network

Transcription:

Making Sense of Evolving Reference Frames for North America Mike Craymer Geodetic Survey Division, Natural Resources Canada Giovanni Sella U.S. National Geodesy Survey American Geophysical Union 2007 Joint Assembly Acapulco, May 22-25, 2006

Abstract The World Geodetic System 1984 (WGS84) and North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83) are the most widely-used spatial reference systems in North America. NAD83 is the national reference system used for georeferencing by most federal and provincial/state agencies while WGS84 is the default "native" system used by the Global Positioning System (GPS) and commercial GPS receivers. The physical realization of these reference systems have undergone several updates since they were first introduced over two decades ago. NAD83 has evolved from a traditional, ground-based horizontal control network to a space-based 3D realization fully supporting modern GPS techniques and the integration of both horizontal and vertical reference systems. WGS84, on the other hand, has no publicly accessible ground-based network. It is accessible only via broadcast orbits that provide positions with an accuracy of about a meter at best (with augmented corrections). More recently, a new reference systems called the Stable North American Reference Frame (SNARF) has been created primarily in support of Plate Boundary Observatory component of the EarthScope project. We explain the differences between these global and regional reference frames and as well as their relationship to each other. We also discuss some problems that occur when these relationships are not properly represented as done, for example, with NAD83 in the vast majority of GPS receivers.

Outline Old Reference Frames : World Geodetic System 1984 (WGS84) North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83) Modern Reference Frames: International Terrestrial Reference Frame (ITRF) WGS84(G ) NAD83(CSRS/CORS96) SNARF Some practical issues

Old Reference Frames WGS84 NAD83

Original WGS84 Native reference frame of GPS Datum WGS84 ellipsoid (=GRS80) Based on Doppler & BTS84 Aligned to international BTS84 Near-geocentric +/- 1 m (best could do at the time) No physical ground network or coordinates Geoid Geocentred on Earth s centre of mass (as known in 1986) Satellites (brdcst orbits) are only accessible control Enables point positioning only: 1-10 m accuracy WGS84 Ellipsoid

Original NAD83 National reference system in Canada & U.S. Datum GRS80 ellipsoid (=WGS84) Defined same as WGS84 Identical to WGS84 Fixed to North American plate Physical realization Traditional control networks & published coordinates

Limitations of Original WGS84/NAD83 Revealed by advances in GPS 1) Non-geocentric Offset from geocenter by 1-2 meters Incompatible with modern reference frames 2) NAD83 primarily a horizontal reference frame Densified using traditional 2D survey methods Errors of up to 1 m and more

Errors in Original NAD83

Modern Reference Frames ITRF WGS84 G series NAD83(CSRS/CORS96) SNARF

International Terrestrial Reference Frame Best geocentric system available Stable to about a cm Maintained by IERS under auspices of IAG Primarily for scientific community & national datums Dynamic system Coordinates changing due to plate tectonics Valid only for a specific date (epoch) Velocities provided to update to other epochs Frequent new realizations Due to more data & improved techniques ITRF88 ITRF89 ITRF90 ITRF91 ITRF92 ITRF93 ITRF94 ITRF96 ITRF97 ITRF2000 ITRF2005

Plate Tectonic Motions ~2 cm/y

WGS84 G Series Original WGS84 Realigned to ITRF (shifted/reoriented) Better accuracy & stability than original Based on (compatible with) internationally adopted ITRF Version Based on Introduced WGS84(G730) ITRF91 1994 WGS84(G873) ITRF94 1996 WGS84(G1150) ITRF2000 2002 Still no ground network -- point positioning only Introduced a coordinate shift In Canada: 1.5 m horiz. 0.2-1.0 m vert. Not noticeable in WGS84 (+/- 1 m) but is in NAD83

Original WGS84/NAD83 vs WGS84(G1150)/ITRF2000

NAD83(CSRS/CORS96) Defined as a best fitting transformation from ITRF 14 parameter transformation Models tectonic motion of North America As accurate & stable as ITRF Adopted in Canada (CSRS) and U.S. (CORS96) Transformation updated for new ITRFs Web & software tools available at NRCan & NGS Still compatible with NAD83(Orig) Differences due to errors in original realization Different from new WGS84(G ) by 1.5 m!!

NAD83 WGS84 ITRF Fixed 1986 Original NAD83 - NAD83 reference system based on Doppler - Coordinate shifts of 1.5 m horizontally, 1 m vertically - metre-accuracy NAD83 Fixed 1987 Original WGS84 - same as NAD83 - +/- 1 m accuracy Dynamic 1.5 m shift Dynamic 1988 ITRF88 - geocentric ITRF89 ITRF90 1998 NAD83 (CSRS/CORS96) - same NAD83 reference system - same geocentre offset/misalign - transformation from ITRF - cm-accuracy NAD83 1994 WGS84(G730) - aligned with ITRF91 1997 WGS84(G873) - aligned with ITRF94 2001 WGS84(G1150) - aligned with ITRF2000 ITRF91 ITRF92 ITRF93 ITRF94 ITRF96 ITRF97 ITRF2000 ITRF2005 Small incremental changes

Stable North American Reference Frame (SNARF) Fixed to stable part of North American tectonic plate True geocentric version of NAD83 Defined by translation + rotation rates from ITRF that minimizes motion of frame sites More stable & consistent frame for EarthScope/PBO studies Includes model of glacial isostatic adjustment Based on novel technique by Jim Davis Weighted assimilation of GPS and a priori GIA model Provides estimates of both vertical & horizontal velocities SNARF Releases Initial release Dec 2006 -- in use by PBO Next version planned for end of 2007 Will use more reliable GPS velocity fields

SNARF v1.0 GIA Model

Practical Issues NGA Datum Shift for NAD83 GPS Correction Sevices

National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency Datum Shift for NAD83 NGA (publishers of WGS84) official datum shift table http://earth-info.nga.mil/gandg/publications/tr8350.2/tr8350_2.html Used by majority of GSP receivers Set receiver to NAD83 output Zero datum shift applied (incorrect) NAD83-WGS84 zero 3 parameter shift (incorrect) Still in WGS84 -- need to transform using adopted procedure

GPS Correction/Processing Services Reference frame depends on service/source Uncorrected or WAAS corrections Receiver positions always in WGS84 But still in WGS84 if receiver applies zero shift to NAD83 Canadian CDGPS or Coast Guard corrections Receiver positions in NAD83(CSRS) Falls back to WGS84 without warning if service signal lost Post-processing with OPUS (US) Output in both NAD83(CORS96) & ITRF/WGS84(G) Post-processing with CSRS-PPP (Canada) Select output in either NAD83(CSRS) or ITRF/WGS84(G)

For More Information Craymer, M. (2006) The evolution of NAD83 in Canada. Geomatica, Vol. 60, No. 2, pp. 151-164. Soler, T., R. Snay (2004). Transforming Positions and Velocities between the International Terrestrial Reference Frame of 2000 and North American Datum of 1983. Journal of Surveying Engineering, Vol. 130, No. 2, pp. 49-55. Snay, R. (2003) NGS Geodetic Toolkit, Part 5, Horizontal Time- Dependent Positioning. Professional Surveyor, Vol. 23, No. 11, p. 30. Stable North American Reference Frame <http://www.naref.org/snarf/>