Capacity for mineral storage of CO2 in basalt

Similar documents
CO2 storage potential of basaltic rocks in Iceland and the oceanic ridges

Available online at ScienceDirect. Energy Procedia 63 (2014 ) GHGT-12

Geology and Hydrothermal Alteration in the Reservoir of the Hellisheiði High Temperature System, SW-Iceland

Geology and Hydrothermal Alteration of the Hverahlid HT-System, SW-Iceland

Reykjavík. Hengill central volcano. 1. Geological map of SW-Iceland and location of Hengill central volcano and the Reykjavík capital.

CO2 storage modelling and capacity estimates for the Trøndelag Platform a basin modelling approach

NOTICE CONCERNING COPYRIGHT RESTRICTIONS

Borehole Geology and Alteration Mineralogy of Well He-52, Hellisheidi Geothermal Field, SW-Iceland

CO2 fixation by calcite in high - temperature geothermal systems in Iceland

Preparation for a New Power Plant in the Hengill Geothermal Area, Iceland

Keywords. GRC Transactions, Vol. 39, Hengill

MODELLING OF CONDITIONS CLOSE TO GEOTHERMAL HEAT SOURCES

Sustainable Energy Science and Engineering Center GEOTHERMAL ENERGY. Sustainable Energy Sources. Source:

Mineral Carbonation of CO 2

THE RESISTIVITY STRUCTURE OF HIGH-TEMPERATURE GEOTHERMAL SYSTEMS IN ICELAND

A brief history of CarbFix: Challenges and victories of the project s pilot phase

Hydrothermal Alteration of Pyroxene in the Hellisheiði Geothermal Field, SW-Iceland

Applicability of GEOFRAC to model a geothermal reservoir: a case study

IEAGHG Study Programme Update

ScienceDirect. Characterisation and selection of the most prospective CO 2 storage sites in the Nordic region

Comparison of Down-Hole and Surface Resistivity Data from the Hellisheidi Geothermal Field, SW-Iceland

3D INVERSION OF MT DATA IN GEOTHERMAL EXPLORATION: A WORKFLOW AND APPLICATION TO HENGILL, ICELAND

WELL TEST ANALYSIS AND TEMPERATURE AND PRESSURE MONITORING OF KRAFLA AND NESJAVELLIR HIGH-TEMPERATURE GEOTHERMAL FIELDS, ICELAND

Carbon Sequestration in Basalts: Laboratory Studies and Field Demonstration

Iceland Deep Drilling Project (IDDP): Drilling Targets for Supercritical Fluid

ISOR Iceland GeoSurvey Geothermal exploration and development

GEOTHERMAL BOREHOLE INVESTIGATIONS DURING AND AFTER DRILLING

Geothermal Surface Exploration in Iceland

INJECTION AND PRODUCTION WELL TESTING IN THE GEOTHERMAL FIELDS OF SOUTHERN HENGILL AND REYKJANES, SW-ICELAND AND THEISTAREYKIR, N-ICELAND

Movement of the Earth s Crust: Formation of: Mountain s Plateau's and Dome s

Waterways from glaciers to coastal waters in Iceland. Jórunn Harðardóttir, IMO Nordic WFD conference September 26, 2012

TEMPERATURE DISTRIBUTION AND CONCEPTUAL RESERVOIR MODEL FOR GEOTHERMAL FIELDS IN AND AROUND THE CITY OF REYKJAVÍK, ICELAND

The Role of Magnetotellurics in Geothermal Exploration

A) B) C) D) 4. Which diagram below best represents the pattern of magnetic orientation in the seafloor on the west (left) side of the ocean ridge?

Characterizing a Geothermal Reservoir Using Broadband 2-D MT Survey in Theistareykir, Iceland

Structural Geology tectonics, volcanology and geothermal activity. Kristján Saemundsson ÍSOR Iceland GeoSurvey

Chapter 13. Groundwater

I know that dinosaurs were not very big at the time of the end Triassic extinction, but this graphic from the National Science Foundation website

Earthquakes. Earthquakes are caused by a sudden release of energy

THE CHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF GEOTHERMAL FLUIDS IN JIAODONG PENINSULA, SHANDONG, CHINA

JAPEX s 60 Years Experience Exploring Volcanic Reservoirs in Japan*

Retrograde Alteration of Basaltic Rocks in the Þeistareykir High-Temperature Geothermal Field, North-Iceland

Tailings and Mineral Carbonation: The Potential for Atmospheric CO 2 Sequestration

GAS GEOTHERMOMETRY AND EQUILIBRIA IN ICELANDIC GEOTHERMAL SYSTEMS

Isotopic Characteristics (δ 18 O, δd, δ 13 C, 14 C) of Thermal Waters in the Mosfellssveit and Reykjavík Low-Temperature Areas, Iceland

SUB-SURFACE GEOLOGY AND HYDROTHERMAL ALTERATION OF WELLS LA-9D AND LA-10D OF ALUTO LANGANO GEOTHERMAL FIELD, ETHIOPIA

Characterization of Subsurface Permeability of the Olkaria East Geothermal Field

TENORM in geothermal applications in Iceland

Characterizing a geothermal reservoir using broadband 2-D MT survey in Theistareykir, Iceland

RESISTIVITY OF ROCKS

Exploration and Utilization of the Námafjall High Temperature Area in N-Iceland

TAKE HOME EXAM 8R - Geology

International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control

Questions and Topics

Energy Procedia 4 (2011) Energy Procedia 00 (2010) GHGT-10

UNIT 3 GEOLOGY VOCABULARY FLASHCARDS THESE KEY VOCABULARY WORDS AND PHRASES APPEAR ON THE UNIT 3 CBA

Námafjall High Temperature Field in N Iceland. A 3D Resistivity Model Derived from MT Data

BOREHOLE GEOLOGY AND ALTERATION MINERALOGY OF WELL HE-9 IN HELLISHEIDI GEOTHERMAL FIELD, SW-ICELAND

WAMUNYU EDWARD MUREITHI I13/2358/2007

SURFACE EXPLORATION AND MONITORING OF GEOTHERMAL ACTIVITY IN THE KVERKFJÖLL GEOTHERMAL AREA, CENTRAL ICELAND

Practice Questions: Plate Tectonics

Geophysical Exploration of High Temperature Geothermal Areas using Resistivity Methods. Case Study: TheistareykirArea, NE Iceland

Geology 12 FINAL EXAM PREP. Possible Written Response Exam Questions

Capabilities of TOUGH Codes for Modeling Geologic Sequestration and Leakage of CO 2

Earth s Continents and Seafloors. GEOL100 Physical Geology Ray Rector - Instructor

The importance of understanding coupled processes in geothermal reservoirs. Thomas Driesner October 19, 2016

Theory of Plate Tectonics

Outcomes of the Workshop on the Geologic and Geothermal Development of the Western Branch of the Greater East African Rift System

I 200 anni dell'utilizzo industriale del sito di Larderello: una geotermia sostenibile

Structural Controls on the Chemistry and Output of the Wells in the Olkaria Geothermal Field, Kenya

The interplay of non-static permeability and fluid flow as a possible pre-requisite for supercritical geothermal resources

GEOTHERMAL MAPPING IN WESTERN ÖLKELDUHÁLS FIELD, HENGILL AREA, SW-ICELAND

FRIO BRINE SEQUESTRATION PILOT IN THE TEXAS GULF COAST

The roots of volcanic geothermal systems their birth, evolution and extinction.

Geochemical monitoring of the response ofgeothermal reservoirs to production load examples from Krafla, Iceland

A Conceptual Hydrological Model of the Thermal Areas within the Northern Neovolcanic Zone, Iceland using Stable Water Isotopes

Before Plate Tectonics: Theory of Continental Drift

Demonstration of capture, injection and geological Sequestration (storage) in Flood Basalt Formation of India.

Origin and Evolution of the Ocean Floor

GEOLOGY CURRICULUM. Unit 1: Introduction to Geology

1. What is the definition of uniformitarianism? 2. What is the definition of organic? 4. What is the definition of inorganic?

Outcomes of the Workshop on the Geologic and Geothermal Development of the Western Branch of the Greater East African Rift System

HIGH TEMPERATURE HYDROTHERMAL ALTERATION IN ACTIVE GEOTHERMAL SYSTEMS A CASE STUDY OF OLKARIA DOMES

Geothermal Potential of the Kenya Rift: energy estimates based on new data. Peter Omenda and Silas Simiyu KenGen

Catalogue of active geothermal manifestations in West Iceland

Determination of Calcite Scaling Potential in OW-903 and OW-914 of the Olkaria Domes field, Kenya

Global Carbon Cycle - I

Soils, Hydrogeology, and Aquifer Properties. Philip B. Bedient 2006 Rice University

2 Igneous Rock. How do igneous rocks form? What factors affect the texture of igneous rock? BEFORE YOU READ. Rocks: Mineral Mixtures

What is the scope for carbon capture and storage in Northern Ireland. Michelle Bentham

Reservoir Assessment of the Ölfus-Bakki Low-Temperature Geothermal Area, SW Iceland

Section 1: Earth s Interior and Plate Tectonics Section 2: Earthquakes and Volcanoes Section 3: Minerals and Rocks Section 4: Weathering and Erosion

BOREHOLE GEOLOGY AND HYDROTHERMAL ALTERATION OF WELL HE-58, HELLISHEIDI GEOTHERMAL FIELD, SW-ICELAND

Topics: The Layers of the Earth and its Formation Sources of Heat Volcanos and Earthquakes Rock Cycle Rock Types Carbon Tax

Welcome to GEO 101 Introduction to Geology

RAYMOND SIEVER Harvard University

Exploration of Geothermal High Enthalpy Resources using Magnetotellurics an Example from Chile

The Reykjanes Seawater Geothermal System Its exploitation under regulatory constraints

CH2356 Energy Engineering Geothermal Energy. Dr. M. Subramanian

Chapter 4 Rocks & Igneous Rocks

Transcription:

Capacity for mineral storage of CO2 in basalt S. Ó. Snæbjörnsdottir NORDICCS Technical Report D. 6.3.1303 May 2014

Summary Mineral storage of CO 2 in basaltic rocks offers the potential for long term, safe CO 2 storage. Studies on mineral storage of CO 2 are still at an early stage. Therefore, natural analogues are important for gaining a better understanding of CO 2 fixation in basaltic rocks. Volcanic geothermal systems serve as an applicable analogue; the systems receive considerable amounts of CO 2 from magma chambers or intrusions in the roots of the systems and can therefore be considered as a natural experiment to determine the CO 2 storage capacity of the bedrock. There is a high potential for mineral storage of CO 2 in Icelandic basalts and large amounts of CO 2 are already naturally fixed within the geothermal systems. Wiese et al. (2008) estimates that the total CO 2 fixed within the active geothermal hightemperature systems in Iceland amounts to 30 40 GtCO 2. This is equal to the anthropogenic global annual emission of CO 2 to the atmosphere in 2012. The potential capacity for mineral storage of CO 2 in Icelandic basalts remains theoretical until more experience is gained by up scaling of ongoing demonstration Keywords Authors Mineral storage, geothermal, basalts, storage capacity. Sandra Ó. Snæbjörnsdóttir, University of Iceland, Iceland, sos22@hi.is Date May 2014 About NORDICCS Nordic CCS Competence Centre, NORDICCS, is a networking platform for increased CCS deployment in the Nordic countries. NORDICCS has 10 research partners and six industry partners, is led by SINTEF Energy Research, and is supported by Nordic Innovation through the Top level Research Initiative. The views presented in this report solely represent those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of other members in the NORDICCS consortia, NORDEN, The Top Level Research Initiative or Nordic Innovation. For more information regarding NORDICCS and available reports, please visit http://www.sintef.no/nordiccs.

Activity 6.3.3: Capacity for mineral storage of CO2 on land in Iceland Fig 1. Geothermal field; conceptual model from Sæmundsson and Jónsdóttir (2010). Mineral storage of carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) in basaltic rocks offers the potential for long-term, safe CO 2 storage. Basaltic rocks are rich in divalent cations, Ca 2+, Mg 2+ and Fe 2+, which react with CO 2 dissolved in water to form stable carbonate minerals such as Calcite (CaCO 3 ), Magnesite (MgCO 3 ) and Siderite (FeCO 3 ) (Oelkers et al., 2008; Gislason et al., 2010). About 90% of the bedrock in Iceland is basalt (Jóhannesson and Sæmundsson, 1998). Studies on mineral storage of CO 2 are still at an early stage (e.g. Alfredsson et al. 2013; Aradóttir et al., 2012). Therefore, natural analogues are important for gaining a better understanding of CO 2 fixation in basaltic rocks. Volcanic geothermal systems serve as an applicable analogue; the systems receive considerable amounts of CO 2 from magma chambers or intrusions in the roots of the systems (Fig. 1) and can therefore be considered as a natural experiment to determine the CO 2 storage capacity of the bedrock (Wiese et al., 2008). 1

Fig. 2 Geothermal map of Iceland (ÍSOR, 2013). High-temperature geothermal areas of concern in Wiese s study are marked with a red box as well as the present energy harnessed from the field in megawatts electricity production (MWe) and megawatts thermal water production (MWth). Wiese et al. (2008) quantified the amount and spatial distribution of CO 2 stored in calcite (CaCO 3 ) within the bedrock of three active geothermal systems in Iceland: Krafla in the north-east of Iceland and Hellisheiði and Reykjanes in the south-west (Fig 2). The CO 2 content was measured in 642 drill cutting samples from a total of 40 wells, located in the three geothermal areas. The results are presented as kg of CO 2 per m 3 rock (Table 1). The values measured in the Reykjanes geothermal area were significantly lower than elsewhere in this study, on average 28.2 kg m -3 of CO 2 fixed in the uppermost 1500 m of the wells. The Reykjanes system is considered to be the youngest of the three geothermal areas, having been active for between 10,000 and 100,000 years (Wiese et al., 2008). The average CO 2 load in the uppermost 1500 m in Hellisheiði geothermal area was measured 65.7 kg m -3, with estimated age between 70,000 and 400,000 years (Franzson et al. 2005). The highest values are measured in the Krafla geothermal area, which is considered to have been active for the longest, between 110,000 and 290,000 years (Wiese et al., 2008), on average 73.1 kg m -3 in the uppermost 1500 m. The values of CO 2 fixed in the bedrock of the three geothermal systems obtained from this study can be used as a guideline for the theoretical potential of CO 2 storage in onshore basaltic formations in Iceland. 2

Table 1 CO 2 load (kg m -3 ) in the uppermost 1500 m of production wells in Reykjanes, Hellisheiði and Krafla geothermal fields (from Wiese et al., 2008). Theoretically, since about 90 % of Icelandic bedrock is basalt, much of Iceland could be used for mineral sequestration of CO 2 (e.g. Gislason et al. 2010). The most feasible storage sites are the youngest basaltic formations in the active rift zone, since their porosity has not been as affected by secondary mineralisation as in the older formations (e.g. Neuhoff et al., 1999). These formations consist of basaltic lavas, hyaloclastic formations and associated sediments younger than 0.8 M yr., from upper Pleistocene and Holocene, covering about 34,000 km 2 of Iceland (Fig 3). Observations of hydrothermally altered basaltic rocks show that calcite is not expected to form at temperatures above 290 C (Franzson, 1998). Wiese et al. (2008) and Tómasson and Kristmannsdóttir (1972) report a very similar overall pattern of calcite distribution in geothermal systems in Iceland with increasing abundance of calcite with depth to a maximum at about 200-400 m depth. Below that a gradual decrease in calcite is noted and below about 800-1000 m depth very little calcite is present. By using the average CO 2 load in the uppermost 1500 m of the Reykjanes system as a minimum and the average CO 2 load in the uppermost 1500 m of the Krafla system as a maximum and applying these to a 1000 m thick segment of the relatively fresh basaltic formations within the rift zone we get a gigantic value of 2,470 Gt of CO 2 as a maximum and 953 Gt as a minimum. This scenario is highly theoretical but underscores the enormous mineral storage potential within the rift zone of Iceland where the rocks are young and still porous and normal faults are common. Other attempts have been made to estimate the capacity for mineral storage of CO 2. McGrail et al. (2006) estimated that the Colombia River basalts alone have the capacity to store over 100 Gt of CO 2, assuming an interflow thickness of 10 m, average porosity of 15% and 10 available interflow 3

zones at an average hydrostatic pressure of 100 atm. Anthonsen et al. (2013) applied McGrail s assumptions to the bedrock of Iceland, giving an estimated capacity of about 60 Gt CO 2. Using the same assumption to calculate the potential capacity of mineral storage of CO 2 within the active rift zone in Iceland the number goes down to about 21 Gt CO 2. Furthermore, Goldberg et al. (2008, 2010) revealed the large storage capacity of sub-oceanic basalt formations at the Juan De Fuca plate east of Oregon, USA. The geologically feasible area at suitable depth for mineral storage of CO 2 is calculated to be about 78,000 km 2. Assuming a channel system dominating permeability over one-sixth of the uppermost 600 m of the area, it is estimated to contain 7800 km 2 of highly permeable basalt. Given an average channel porosity of 10%, 780 km 3 of potential pore volume will be available for CO 2 storage. Anthonsen et al. (2013) also applied Goldberg et al. (2008) calculations to the bedrock of Iceland, resulting in an enormous number of about 1,200 GtCO 2. If these calculations are limited to the bedrock of the active rift zone in Iceland over 400 Gt CO 2 could be stored. Fig 3. Theoretical area feasible for CO2 mineral storage in Iceland; Basaltic formations from Holocene and upper Pleistocene, younger than 0.8 M yr. Since studies on mineral storage of CO 2 are still at an early stage all values obtained by different approaches to the subject are theoretical. To get a more realistic value of the capacity for mineral storage in Icelandic basalt formations, transportation of CO 2 via pipeline was taken into consideration. The 30 km long, hot water pipeline from Nesjavellir to Reykjavík was used as an approximation and the area within 30 km radius of eight of the largest harbours of the rift zone was selected. 4

The formations included were, as in the previous scenario, basaltic lavas, hyaloclastic formations and associated sediments from upper Pleistocene and postglacial lavas. Three harbours in the northeast were included (Húsavík, Kópasker, Raufarhöfn), one in the south-east (Höfn í Hornafirði) and four in the south-west (Reykjavík, Reykjaneshafnir, Grindavík, and Þorlákshöfn). In addition, an industrial harbour which is under construction in Helguvík, in SW-Iceland, was included. National parks, natural monuments, nature reserves and country parks were excluded from the area. The area that fits the criteria is about 3700 km 2, close to 3% of Iceland (Fig 4). Using the results from Wiese et al. (2008) as done in the previous example and applying the average CO 2 load in the uppermost 1500 m of the Reykjanes system as a minimum and the average CO 2 load in the uppermost 1500 m of the Krafla system as a maximum and to a 1000 m thick segment of the defined area generates a maximum capacity of 272 Gt CO 2 and minimum of 105 Gt CO 2. For comparison, in 2012 the global CO 2 emissions to the atmosphere were 35.6 Gt from fossil fuel burning and cement production. (The Global Carbon Project, 2013). Fig 4. Theoretical area feasible for CO2 mineral storage in Iceland; Basaltic formations from Holocene and upper Pleistocene in the vicinity (radius of 30 km) of a large-scale harbor. Applying the study of McGrail et al. (2006) and assuming an interflow thickness of 10 m, average porosity of 15% and 10 available interflow zones at an average hydrostatic pressure of 100 atm, the estimated capacity of the defined area goes down to about 2 GtCO 2. Using the study of Goldberg et al. (2008) and assuming a channel system dominating permeability over one-sixth of the uppermost 600 m of the area and average channel porosity of 10%, we get a number of 45 GtCO 2. 5

There is a high potential for mineral storage of CO 2 in Icelandic basalts and large amounts of CO 2 are already naturally fixed within the geothermal systems. Wiese et al. (2008) estimates that the total CO 2 fixed within the active geothermal high-temperature systems in Iceland amounts to 30-40 GtCO 2. This is equal to the anthropogenic global annual emission of CO 2 to the atmosphere in 2012 (The Global Carbon Project, 2013). The potential capacity for mineral storage of CO 2 in Icelandic basalts remains theoretical until more experience is gained by up-scaling of ongoing demonstration projects (Gislason et al. 2010). Table 2. Summary of the potential for mineral storage of CO 2 using methods from Wiese et al. (2008), McGrail et al. (2006) and Goldberg et al. (2008) for estimation. Basaltic rocks within in the active rift zone, younger than 0.8 M yr. (34.000 km 2 ) Basaltic rocks in 30 km radius of seven of the largest harbors in Iceland (3.700 km 2 ) GtCO 2 GtCO 2 Wiese et al. (2008) 953-2470* 105-272* McGrail et al. (2006) 21 2 Goldberg et al. (2008) 400 45 *Using CO 2 load in the uppermost 1500 m of the Reykjanes system as a minimum and the average CO 2 load in the uppermost 1500 m of the Krafla system as a maximum 6

References Alfredsson, H.A., Oelkers, E.H., Hardarsson, B.S., Franzson, H., Gunnlaugsson, E. and Gislason, S.R., 2013. The geology and water chemistry of the Hellisheidi, SW-Iceland carbon storage site. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 12, 399-418. Anthonsen, K.L., Aagaard, P., Bergmo., P.E.S., Erlström., M., Fareidei, J.I., Gislason, S.R., Mortensen, G.M., Snæbjörnsdottir, S.Ó., 2013. CO 2 storage potential in the Nordic region. Energy Procedia 37, 5080-5092 Aradóttir, E.S., Sonnenthal, E., Bjornsson, G., Jonsson, H., 2012. Multidimensional reactive transport modeling of CO2 mineral sequestration in basalts at the Hellisheidi geothermal field, Iceland. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 9, 24 40. Franzson, H., Kristjánsson, B.R., Gunnarsson, G., Björnsson, G., Hjartarson, A., Steingrímsson, B., Gunnlaugsson, E., Gíslason, G., 2005: The Hengill-Hellisheiði Geothermal Field. Development of a Conceptual Geothermal Model. Proceedings World Geothermal Congress 2005, Antalya, Turkey 24-29. April, 7 pages. Franzson, H., 1998: Reservoir Geology of the Nesjavellir High-Temperature Field in SW-Iceland. Proceedings 19th Annual PNOC-EDC Geothermal Conference, Manila, Philippines, March 5-6th 1998: bls. 13-20 Gislason, S.R., Wolff-Boenisch, D., Stefansson, A., Oelkers, E.H., Gunnlaugsson, E., Sigurdardottir, H., Sigfusson, B., Broecker, W.S., Matter, J.S., Stute, M., Axelsson, G., Fridriksson, T., 2010. Mineral sequestration of carbon dioxide in basalt: a preinjection overview of the CarbFix project. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 4, 537 545. Goldberg, D.S., Takahashi, T., Slagle, A.L., 2008. Carbon dioxide sequestration in deep sea basalt. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105, 9920 9925. Goldberg, D.S., Kent, D.V., Olsen, P.E., 2010. Potential on-shore and off-shore reservoirs for CO2 sequestration in Central Atlantic magmatic province basalts. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America Sciences 107, 1327 1332. ÍSOR, 2013. Geothermal map of Iceland. http://www.geothermal.is/projects-iceland downloaded 12th of December 2013. Jóhannesson, H. and Sæmundsson, K., 1998. Geological map of Iceland, 1:500.000. Icelandic Institute for Natural History. McGrail, B.P., Schaef, H.T., Ho, A.M., Chien, Yi-Ju, Dooley, J.J., Davidson, C.L., 2006. Potential for carbon dioxide sequestration in flood basalts. Journal of Geophysical Research 111 (B12201), http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005jb004169. 7

Neuhoff, P.S., Fridriksson, T., Arnorsson, S., Bird, D.K., 1999. Porosity evolution and mineral paragenesis during low-grade metamorphism of basaltic lavas at Teigarhorn, Eastern Iceland. Am. J. Sci. 299, 467 501. Oelkers, E.H., Gislason, S.R., Matter, J., 2008. Mineral carbonation of CO 2. Elements 4, 331 335. Sæmundsson, K., Jonsdottir, B., 2010. Geothermal field, conceptual model, figure published by ÍSOR. The Global Carbon Project, 2013. http://www.globalcarbonproject.org/carbonbudget/13/hl-compact.htm. Downloaded 18th of December 2013. Tómasson, J., Kristmannsdóttir, H. (1972). High temperature alteration minerals and thermal brines, Reykjanes, Iceland. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology 36, 132 134. Wiese, F., Fridriksson, T., Ármannsson, H., 2008. CO 2 fixarion by calcite in high-temperature geothermal systems in Iceland. Report, ISOR 2008/003 8