Antimagnetic Rotation in Cd isotopes

Similar documents
Magnetic rotation past, present and future

Antimagnetic rotation in 108,110 In with tilted axis cranking relativistic mean-field approach *

Chapter 6. Summary and Conclusions

Exploring the Structure of Cold and Warm Nuclei Using Particle Accelerators in India

arxiv: v1 [nucl-th] 8 Sep 2011

14. Structure of Nuclei

Fission fragment mass distributions via prompt γ -ray spectroscopy

Nuclear Spectroscopy I

Candidate multiple chiral doublet bands in A 100 mass region

Dr. Niyaz Ahmad Rather

Shape Coexistence and Band Termination in Doubly Magic Nucleus 40 Ca

Nuclear vibrations and rotations

High Spin States in Nuclei: Exotic Quantal Rotation III. Umesh Garg. University of Notre Dame. Supported in part by the National Science Foundation

II. Spontaneous symmetry breaking

Spectroscopy of fission fragments using prompt-delayed coincidence technique

Projected shell model analysis of tilted rotation

H.O. [202] 3 2 (2) (2) H.O. 4.0 [200] 1 2 [202] 5 2 (2) (4) (2) 3.5 [211] 1 2 (2) (6) [211] 3 2 (2) 3.0 (2) [220] ε

Recent results from digital INGA at BARC TIFR Pelletron Linac Facility and future plans

Probing neutron-rich isotopes around doubly closed-shell 132 Sn and doubly mid-shell 170 Dy by combined β-γ and isomer spectroscopy.

The shears mechanism in the lead isotopes

Coexistence phenomena in neutron-rich A~100 nuclei within beyond-mean-field approach

Nuclear structure and Indian Clover array

Particle excitations and rotational modes in nuclei with A 70-90

Some (more) High(ish)-Spin Nuclear Structure. Lecture 2 Low-energy Collective Modes and Electromagnetic Decays in Nuclei

Projected total energy surface description for axial shape asymmetry in 172 W

DSAM lifetime measurements for the chiral bands in 194 Tl

Observables predicted by HF theory

Transverse wobbling. F. Dönau 1 and S. Frauendorf 2 1 XXX 2 Department of Physics, University of Notre Dame, South Bend, Indiana 46556

Gamma-ray spectroscopy I

Pairing Interaction in N=Z Nuclei with Half-filled High-j Shell

B(E2) value of even-even Pd isotopes by interacting boson model-1 *

Specific features and symmetries for magnetic and chiral bands in nuclei

Symmetries and collective Nuclear excitations PRESENT AND FUTURE EXOTICS IN NUCLEAR PHYSICS In honor of Geirr Sletten at his 70 th birthday

Descriptions of triaxial band structures in 133 La

Compound and heavy-ion reactions

Systematics of the K π = 2 + gamma vibrational bands and odd even staggering

RFSS: Lecture 8 Nuclear Force, Structure and Models Part 1 Readings: Nuclear Force Nuclear and Radiochemistry:

Intro to Nuclear and Particle Physics (5110)

Proton-neutron asymmetry in exotic nuclei

arxiv: v1 [nucl-th] 18 Aug 2017

Transition quadrupole moments in γ -soft nuclei and the triaxial projected shell model

Band Structure of nuclei in Deformed HartreeFock and Angular Momentum Projection theory. C. R. Praharaj Institute of Physics Bhubaneswar.

Lecture 4: Nuclear Energy Generation

c E If photon Mass particle 8-1

Nucleon Pair Approximation to the nuclear Shell Model

ELECTRIC MONOPOLE TRANSITIONS AND STRUCTURE OF 150 Sm

The magnetic force acting between nucleons

Band crossing and signature splitting in odd mass fp shell nuclei

Shell Closures and Structural Information from Nucleon Separation Energies

Measurement of the g-factors of 2 + states in stable A=112,114,116 Sn isotopes using the transient field technique

Nuclear Structure (II) Collective models

Nuclear and Radiation Physics

Search for the chiral doublet bands in 78 Br. Speaker: C. Liu Supervisor: Prof. S. Y. Wang Shandong University, Weihai

STUDYING CHIRALITY IN A ~ 100, 130 AND 190 MASS REGIONS. Obed Shirinda. Philosophy in the Department of Physics, University of the Western Cape

Nuclear Shape Dynamics at Different Energy Scales

arxiv: v1 [nucl-th] 11 Jul 2013

RFSS: Lecture 6 Gamma Decay

Correction to Relativistic Mean Field binding energy and N p N n scheme

Properties of Some Superdeformed Bands in Hg-Tl-Pb Nuclei Using Nuclear Softness Model with Weaken Parameter

FIGURE 1. Excitation energy versus angular-momentum plot of the yrast structure of 32 S calculated with the Skyrme III interaction. Density distributi

Lecture #3 a) Nuclear structure - nuclear shell model b) Nuclear structure -quasiparticle random phase approximation c) Exactly solvable model d)

Lifetime Measurement in 103,104 Rh with RDDS Method in Inverse Kinematics: A Test for Nuclear Chirality. Suzuki Tomokazu

Aligned neutron-proton pairs in N=Z nuclei

PHY492: Nuclear & Particle Physics. Lecture 3 Homework 1 Nuclear Phenomenology

Nuclear structure at high excitation energies

Ch. 28: Sources of Magnetic Fields

arxiv:nucl-th/ v1 19 May 2004

RFSS: Lecture 2 Nuclear Properties

arxiv:nucl-ex/ v1 27 May 2002

13. Basic Nuclear Properties

Coexisting normal and triaxial superdeformed structures in 165 Lu

Nucleon Pair Approximation to the nuclear Shell Model

DISCRETE SYMMETRIES IN NUCLEAR AND PARTICLE PHYSICS. Parity PHYS NUCLEAR AND PARTICLE PHYSICS

Fission fragment angular distribution - Analysis and results

Joint ICTP-IAEA Workshop on Nuclear Structure Decay Data: Theory and Evaluation August Introduction to Nuclear Physics - 2

Liquid Drop Model From the definition of Binding Energy we can write the mass of a nucleus X Z

arxiv: v3 [nucl-ex] 12 Jan 2012

Occurrence and Properties of Low Spin Identical Bands in Normal-Deformed Even-Even Nuclei

Allowed beta decay May 18, 2017

Stability of chiral geometry in the odd odd Rh isotopes: spectroscopy of 106 Rh

One- and two-phonon wobbling excitations in triaxial 165 Lu

Evidence for K mixing in 178 Hf

The Charged Liquid Drop Model Binding Energy and Fission

Joint ICTP-IAEA Workshop on Nuclear Structure Decay Data: Theory and Evaluation August Introduction to Nuclear Physics - 1

In this lecture, we will go through the hyperfine structure of atoms. The coupling of nuclear and electronic total angular momentum is explained.

p(p,e + ν)d reaction determines the lifetime of the sun

Rotational motion in thermally excited nuclei. S. Leoni and A. Bracco

Projected shell model for nuclear structure and weak interaction rates

Atomic Structure. Chapter 8

Nuclear structure and stellar weak interaction rates of nuclei below the 132 Sn core

Lesson 5 The Shell Model

PHY492: Nuclear & Particle Physics. Lecture 6 Models of the Nucleus Liquid Drop, Fermi Gas, Shell

Measuring Form Factors and Structure Functions With CLAS

Physics 228 Today: April 22, 2012 Ch. 43 Nuclear Physics. Website: Sakai 01:750:228 or

Microscopic study of the properties of identical bands in the A 150 mass region

Principles of Molecular Spectroscopy

Nuclear Isomerism. Phil Walker. University of Surrey. on the occasion of the 70th birthday of Geirr Sletten

Physics 221A Fall 1996 Notes 13 Spins in Magnetic Fields

Nucleon Pairing in Atomic Nuclei

High-spin isomers: structure and applications

Transcription:

Proceedings of the DAE Symp. on Nucl. Phys. 56 (2011) 3 Antimagnetic Rotation in Cd isotopes S.Chattopadhyay,* and S. Roy Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics, Kolkata - 700064, INDIA. * email: Sukalyan.chattopadhyay@saha.ac.in Antimagnetic rotation is a manifestation of Shears mechanism. In this specific case, the perpendicular components of the dipole moments of the two shears cancel each other due to the symmetry of the structure which leads to the absence of M1 transitions. The talk will cover the recent data on 110 Cd and a model based on classical particle plus rotor. This model has been used to explore the underlying systematics of even-even Cd isotopes and a self consistent picture for the observed behaviours of 106,108,110 Cd will be discussed. This systematic study also helps to estimate the strengths of particle-hole and hole-hole interactions of this mass region. The applicability of this model to the odd-odd Cd isotopes, namely 105,107,109 Cd, will also be discussed. 1. Introduction In a nearly spherical nucleus with a substantial number (four or more) of valence nucleons, the total angular momentum is almost fully generated by the valence nucleons. A very special situation arises near certain shell closures where the neutrons (protons) just above a shell closure (particles) have their angular momentum along the rotational axis while for the protons (neutrons) just below the closure (holes) the angular momentum is along the symmetry axis. Thus, the resultant angular momentum is tilted with respect to both symmetry and rotational axes [1]. This situation has been well described by Shears model by Clark and Macchiavelli [2,3], where the band head spin is generated by the perpendicular coupling of the angular momentum vectors of particle and holes. Thus, in this model, the only important degree of freedom is the angle between these two vectors (blades of the shear), namely, the Shears angle (θ). An interesting consequence of the shear structure has been pointed out by S. Frauendorf [4]. It is possible to have a symmetric double shears structure, where each hole in the time reversed orbit, combines with the particles whose angular momentum vector is along the rotational axis. Thus, the angle between the two hole vectors is 2θ. The higher angular momentum states in this scenario, are generated by simultaneous closing of the two shears. In this specific case, the two perpendicular components of the dipole moments cancel each other due to the symmetry of the structure which leads to the absence of M1 transitions. This coupling scheme has been termed as antimagnetic rotation (AMR) due to it's similarity with anti ferro-magnetism, where the dipole moment of one of the sub-lattice is aligned in the opposite direction to that of the other half which leads to the absence of net magnetic moment. In this model, the electric Fig.1 Observed aligned angular momentum in 106,108,110 Cd [5,6,7]. quadrupole transition rate (B(E2)) is proportional to sin 4 θ. Therefore, as the two shears close symmetrically, the B(E2) rates will show a characteristic drop with increasing angular

Proceedings of the DAE Symp. on Nucl. Phys. 56 (2011) 4 momentum, which distinguishes a AMR band from a band arising due to collective rotation. Till recently only two bands arising due to AMR have been reported along the yrast cascade of 106,108 Cd [8,9]. The close similarity of these two bands in terms of their transition rates and single particle configuration led to a natural expectation of a similar structure in the high spin states of the yrast band of 110 Cd. However, the high spin behaviour of 110 Cd is completely different from its even-even neighbours as shown in Fig. 1 where the aligned angular momenta (i x ) of 106,108,110 Cd have been plotted against the rotational frequency (ω). In all the three cases, a sharp backbend was observed around ω ~ 0.4 MeV due to the alignment of the two h 11/2 neutrons which leads to a large alignment gain. Immediately after the backbend, there is again a small alignment gain in 106,108 Cd due to alignment of two protons in g 7/2 /d 5/2. However, it is absent in 110 Cd and the Cranking Shell Model (CSM) calculations also predicts this alignment (AB crossing) to be around 0.7 MeV in 110 Cd. On the other hand, there is a large alignment gain between ω = 0.65 and 0.72 MeV in 110 Cd which is absent in 106,108 Cd. No satisfactory explanation of such a large alignment gain could be given from CSM calculations. The high spin states of 110 Cd were populated through the reaction 96 Zr( 18 O,4n) 110 Cd at a beam energy of 70 MeV delivered by the 15UD Pelletron Accelerator at Inter University Accelerator Centre (IUAC), New Delhi. The γ- rays were detected in the Indian National Gamma Array (INGA) which consisted of 18 Compton suppressed Clover detectors. The lifetimes of levels beyond 16 + were estimated using the LINESHAPE analysis code of Wells and Johnson. The examples of fitted lineshapes are shown in Fig. 2. The estimated B(E2) rates exhibit a steady fall as a function of angular momentum beyond I = 18 +. This behavior is the characteristic signature of AMR which has also been observed in 106,108 Cd. Thus, in 110 Cd, though the high spin states of the yrast band seems to originate from AMR, the alignment behaviour is completely different from it's immediate even-even neighbours. Fig. 2 Observed and fitted lineshapes in 110 Cd. In order to explore the underlying systematics, we have used the classical analog of two-particle-plus-rotor model. For the Cdisotopes, the two symmetric shears are formed 1 2 between j h = j h = j π and j ν = a j π, where a is the ratio of the magnitude of proton and neutron angular momenta. This model has been first applied to well known AMR bands of 106,108 Cd. This helped to fix two important free parameters namely, magnitudes of particle-hole repulsive (V πν ) and hole-hole attractive interactions (V ππ ). For 108 Cd, the states between 16 + and 24 + was found to originate due to AMR [9], and the corresponding single particle configuration is -2 2 πg 9/2 x ν[h 11/2 πg 7/22 ]. This configuration has eight proton-neutron combinations in contrast to one proton-proton combination. Fig 3(a), shows the comparison of theoretical and experimental I(ω) plot where the calculated frequencies have been shifted by the band head frequency (0.468 MeV). In this case, the calculations are more sensitive to the value of V πν and the best agreement between experimental and theoretical values have been obtained for V πν = 1.2 MeV. The dependence on V ππ is weaker due to the scaling factor and can be varied between 0 to 0.2 MeV without any significant deterioration in the quality of the fit. These features have been demonstrated in Fig. 3(a) where the solid, dotted and dashed lines represent the calculated values for V πν = 1.2, 1.0 and 1.3 MeV, respectively and V ππ = 0.15 MeV. The B(E2) values have been calculated for eq eff =1.1 eb [9]. The calculated (solid line) and

Proceedings of the DAE Symp. on Nucl. Phys. 56 (2011) 5 experimental values have been plotted in Fig. 3(b), which shows a fair agreement. Thus, the I(ω) and B(E2) values indicate that yrast levels from 16 + to 24 + of 108 Cd constitutes an antimagnetic band whose band head frequency and angular momentum are 0.47 MeV and 16 +, respectively [10]. assumption implies that the angular momentum generated by shears mechanism and core rotation is almost equal. Thus, the frequency (ω) will be given by [10], ω = ω rot - ω sh where, ω sh and ω rot are the shears and core rotational frequencies, respectively. The moment of inertia of the core has been assumed Fig. 3. The observed I(ω) plots ((a) and (c)) and B(E2) rates ((b) and (d)) in 108 Cd and 106 Cd, respectively. The lines represent the calculated values using the classical particle plus rotor model. The solid, dotted and dashed lines in ((a) and (c)) are the calculated values for V πν = 1.2, 1.0 and 1.3 MeV, respectively. The situation is very similar in 106 Cd, except j ν = 18 has been used, which is consistent with the assumption that the band head spin (θ = 90 0 ) is 18 + [8]. The calculated (shifted by band head frequency) and observed I(ω) plots and B(E2) values are shown in fig. 3 (c) and (d), respectively. The agreement is again satisfactory for V πν = 1.2 MeV and V ππ can be varied between 0 and 0.2 MeV [10]. The situation changes in 110 Cd. The expected configuration for the high spin states is πg 9/2-2 x νh 11/22, since the alignment plot (Fig. 1) does not support the alignment of g 7/2 neutrons. Thus, for this configuration there are four neutron-proton combinations. For the calculation, the band head has been assumed to be 12 +, since the h 11/2 neutron alignment takes place around 10 + which is essential for the formation of the double shear structure. Such an Fig. 4. The observed I(ω) (a) and B(E2) rates (b) in 110 Cd. The dot-dashed and dot-dot-dashed line in (a) represents a rotor with moment of inertia of 19.5 and 13 MeV -1 h 2, respectively. The dotted, solid and dashed lines in (a) represents the calculated routhians for V ππ = 0, 0.15 and 0.30 MeV, respectively and eq eff = 1.1 eb. The solid and the dashed lines in (b) represents the calculated B(E2) values for AMR+rotation and pure AMR, respectively. to be half the rigid rotor value. It is interesting to note that this value gives similar slope as the experimental I(ω) plot in the frequency interval of 0.4 to 0.6 MeV (shown as the dot dashed line in Fig. 4(a). The difference in the values along the angular momentum axis is due to the contribution of the two aligned h 11/2 neutrons. The relative negative sign in the equation takes into account the fact that in the present case, the angular momentum is generated both through collective and shear mechanisms. Thus, a given angular momentum state will be formed

Proceedings of the DAE Symp. on Nucl. Phys. 56 (2011) 6 at a lower energy (i.e. frequency) as compared to that due to pure core rotation. For the calculations, V πν = 1.2 MeV has been fixed since this value has been established from the systematics of 106, 108 Cd. The calculated values have been plotted as dotted, solid and dashed lines in Fig. 4(a) for V ππ = 0, 0.15 and 0.30 MeV, respectively. It is evident from the figure that the experimental I(ω) beyond 0.65 MeV is well reproduced for V ππ = 0.15 MeV and it has a definitive effect on the curvature of the routhian. On the other hand, for V ππ = 0.30 MeV, the predicted I(ω) plot deviates substantially from the experimental values. However, the quality of the fit remains unchanged till V ππ = 0.20 MeV. The effect of V ππ becomes appreciable in 110 Cd since, there are four particle-hole combinations, while in 106, 108 Cd there are eight. Thus, the present calculation suggests that if the hole-hole interaction is assumed to have a functional form of P 2 (2θ), then the strength of this repulsive interaction is ~ 0.15-0.20 MeV for A= 110 region. The present calculations seem to indicate that the highest observed state of the yrast band (28 + ) does not arise due to AMR (see Fig. 3(a)). It is worth noting that in the present scheme the band head frequency (θ = 90 0 and ω sh = 0), is ω rot, and is determined by the core moment of inertia. But, since this value is used in the calculation of total angular momentum, the nature of the I(ω) plot also depends on it. The dot-dot-dashed line in Fig. 4(a) represents the I(ω) plot for one-third the rigid rotor value. It is evident that it neither reproduces the band crossing nor the shape of the experimental I(ω) plot. Thus, this simultaneous validation helps to justify the choice of the value of moment of inertia in the present model. The present AMR+rotation model for 110 Cd predicts a slower fall of B(E2) as a function of angular momentum as compared to the pure AMR bands in 106,108 Cd. This is due the fact that the shear angle closes from 90 0 to 0 0 over a angular momentum range of 16 units in case of 110 Cd while this range is 8 units in 106,108 Cd. The predicted B(E2) values for these two scenarios, have been shown in Fig. 4(b) for 110 Cd where the dashed line assume the band head spin of 20 + (pure AMR) while the solid line corresponds to the AMR+rotation configuration in the spin domain where it is yrast. It is evident from the figure that the experimental values agrees well with the calculated values for AMR+rotation configuration. Thus, this work [10] establishes for the first time, an interplay between antimagnetic and core rotation which is responsible for the generation of high angular momentum states (beyond 18 + ) in the yrast band of 110 Cd. This effect can be decisively concluded from the measured B(E2) rates which show a slower fall as compared to the pure AMR bands in 106,108 Cd. The comparison between the experimental and theoretical I(ω) values in 110 Cd also supports this picture. From the present systematic study the strength of particle-hole interaction for antimagnetic rotation has been estimated for the first timeand found to be 1.2 MeV for all the three Cd isotopes, while the hole-hole interaction strength has been found to be between 0.15 to 0.20 MeV. This model could compute the theoretical I(ω) plot for the first time for an AMR band. Thus, it was also applied to explore the possibilities of AMR for odd-a Cd-isotopes [11]. The high spin levels of the negative parity yrast sequence of 109 Cd beyond 31/2 - originates -2 3 due to πg 9/2 x νh 11/2 configuration [12]. The double shear structure is formed by the three aligned neutrons and the two proton holes. Thus, there are six possible particle-hole pairs and one hole-hole pair which implies that it is an intermediate case between 108 Cd (8 pairs) and 110 Cd (4 pairs). The band head spin (j ν ) for this configuration is 27/2 (11/2 + 9/2 + 7/2) which is shifted by two units due to core rotation. It is to be noted that a similar situation was found in 106 Cd [8]. This band has been established up to 51/2 -. For the calculations, the strength of the interactions are taken to be the same as found for even-even Cd-isotopes and the rotational moment of inertia chosen such that it reproduces the slope of the I(ω) plot for the ground state band. This is shown Fig. 5(a) by the dotted line. With this set of fixed parameters, the I(ω) plot for the neutron aligned yrast band of 109 Cd has been calculated and shown as the solid line

Proceedings of the DAE Symp. on Nucl. Phys. 56 (2011) 7 in Fig. 5(a). The calculated frequencies have been shifted by the band head frequency of 0.51 MeV. It is evident from the figure that the AMR configuration is non-yrast over the entire frequency range. The calculated B(E2) values are shown by the solid line in Fig. 5(b). It is apparent that themeasured B(E2) values are about twice as large as that predicted by the model. (eb) 2, respectively and are in good agreement with the experimental values. The corresponding band for 107 Cd has not been extended to higher spin values [15]. Thus, the I(ω) plot has been calculated for three possible values of of core moment of inertia with dashed, solid and dot-dashed lines. Once the higher spin levels of this band is established this parameter will get fixed in a similar way as in case of other Cd-isotopes. Thus, the model calculations will have a definitive prediction of $I(\omega)$ behavior of the band if it originates due to AMR+rotation. Thus, a systematic study of AMR in 105-110 Cd has been presented within a common framework of classical particle rotor model where the most important free parameters, namely, the strengths of particle-hole and holehole interaction has been kept unchanged. Acknowledgments Fig 5 The observed I(ω) plots [(a), (c) and (e)] and B(E2) [(b), (d) and (f)] values for 109,107,105 Cd. The solid line represents the calculated values using the classical particle rotor model for V πν = 1.2 MeV, V ππ = 0.2 MeV. Thus, the present calculations indicate that the high spin yrast levels of 109 Cd do not originate due to AMR. The negative parity yrast sequence of 105 Cd has been established upto 47/2 - [13]. The levels beyond 23/2 - originate due to πg 9/2-2 x νh 11/2 3 configuration. The experimental and calculated I(ω) plot for the neutron aligned band have been shown in Fig. 5(c), where the calculated frequencies have been shifted by the band head frequency 0.4 MeV. It is interesting to note that the AMR configuration is non-yrast at lower frequencies but becomes yrast around 0.60 MeV which corresponds to 35/2 - level. Thus, the levels beyond 31/2 - are expected to originate due to AMR. Recently, These level lifetimes have been measured by Choudhuri et al. [14]. The predicted B(E2) values for 31/2 - (θ = 74 0 ), 35/2 - (θ = 65 0 ) and 39/2 - (θ = 54 0 ) levels are 0.15, 0.12 and 0.07 We thank all the technical staff of the Pelletron facility at IUAC, New Delhi, for smooth operation of the machine. We would also like to thank Professor John Wells for providing the lineshape analysis package. References [1] S. Frauendorf, Nucl. Phys. A557, 259c (1993). [2] R.M. Clark and A. O. Macchiavelli, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 50, 1 (2000). [3] A.O. Macchiavelli, et al., Phys. Rev. C57, R1073 (1998). [4] S. Frauendorf, Rev. of Mod. Phys. 73, 463b (2001). [5] S. Juutinen et al., Nucl. Phys. A573, 306 (1994). [6] P. H. Regan et al., Nucl. Phys. A586, 351 (1995). [7] I. Thorslund et al., Nucl. Phys. A564, 285 (1993). [8] A. J. Simons et al.,phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 162501 (2003). [9] P. Datta et al., Phys. Rev. C71, 041305(R) (2005). [10] Santosh Roy et al., Phys. Lett B694 (2011) 322

Proceedings of the DAE Symp. on Nucl. Phys. 56 (2011) 8 [11] S. Roy et al., Phys. Rev C83 (2011) 024305 [12] C. J. Chiara et al., Phys. Rev. C61, 034318 (2000). [13] D. Jerrestam et al., Nucl. Phys. A593, 162 (1992). [14] D. Choudhuri et al. Phys. Rev C82 (2011) 061308 (R) [16] Dan Jerrestam et al., Nucl. Phys. A545, 835 (1992).