Quantitative evolution of morphology

Similar documents
Phenotypic Evolution. and phylogenetic comparative methods. G562 Geometric Morphometrics. Department of Geological Sciences Indiana University

GEOMETRIC MORPHOMETRICS. Adrian Castellanos, Michelle Chrpa, & Pedro Afonso Leite

Optimum selection and OU processes

Geometric morphometrics

OVERVIEW. L5. Quantitative population genetics

Evolutionary Theory. Sinauer Associates, Inc. Publishers Sunderland, Massachusetts U.S.A.

Statistical nonmolecular phylogenetics: can molecular phylogenies illuminate morphological evolution?

Discrete & continuous characters: The threshold model

GENETICS - CLUTCH CH.22 EVOLUTIONARY GENETICS.

Phylogeny, trees and morphospace

How can molecular phylogenies illuminate morphological evolution?

Reproduction- passing genetic information to the next generation

The Origin of Species

Some of these slides have been borrowed from Dr. Paul Lewis, Dr. Joe Felsenstein. Thanks!

ANALYSIS OF CHARACTER DIVERGENCE ALONG ENVIRONMENTAL GRADIENTS AND OTHER COVARIATES

Contrasts for a within-species comparative method

2.2 Selection on a Single & Multiple Traits. Stevan J. Arnold Department of Integrative Biology Oregon State University

Modularity for Mathematica User s Guide Version 2.0

Vertebrate Biogeography and Evolution

BRIEF COMMUNICATIONS

1. T/F: Genetic variation leads to evolution. 2. What is genetic equilibrium? 3. What is speciation? How does it occur?

Chapter 16: Evolutionary Theory

Chapter 17: Population Genetics and Speciation

Evolutionary Physiology

Evolution and Epigenetics. Seminar: Social, Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience Speaker: Wolf-R. Brockhaus

Statistical Models in Evolutionary Biology An Introductory Discussion

Lecture 24: Multivariate Response: Changes in G. Bruce Walsh lecture notes Synbreed course version 10 July 2013

Theory a well supported testable explanation of phenomenon occurring in the natural world.

Title: Adaptive dynamics under development-based genotypephenotype

Macroevolution of Organismal Modularity and Integration. Gunther J. Eble Bioinformatik, Universität Leipzig

Phylogenetics - IB 200B 15 Feb Morphometrics

Evaluating modularity in morphometric data: challenges with the RV coefficient and a new test measure

Selection on multiple characters

Big Idea #1: The process of evolution drives the diversity and unity of life

BIOL EVOLUTION OF QUANTITATIVE CHARACTERS

Performance Surfaces and Adaptive Landscapes 1

Does convergent evolution always result from different lineages experiencing similar

Homework Assignment, Evolutionary Systems Biology, Spring Homework Part I: Phylogenetics:

... x. Variance NORMAL DISTRIBUTIONS OF PHENOTYPES. Mice. Fruit Flies CHARACTERIZING A NORMAL DISTRIBUTION MEAN VARIANCE

Chapter 27: Evolutionary Genetics

SPECIATION. REPRODUCTIVE BARRIERS PREZYGOTIC: Barriers that prevent fertilization. Habitat isolation Populations can t get together

Selection on Multiple Traits

Quantitative Trait Variation

NCEA Level 2 Biology (91157) 2017 page 1 of 5 Assessment Schedule 2017 Biology: Demonstrate understanding of genetic variation and change (91157)

Selection on Correlated Characters (notes only)

AP Biology Review Packet 5- Natural Selection and Evolution & Speciation and Phylogeny

Phylogeny and systematics. Why are these disciplines important in evolutionary biology and how are they related to each other?

Biology 11 UNIT 1: EVOLUTION LESSON 2: HOW EVOLUTION?? (MICRO-EVOLUTION AND POPULATIONS)

Conceptually, we define species as evolutionary units :

Evolution and Natural Selection

EVOLUTION. HISTORY: Ideas that shaped the current evolutionary theory. Evolution change in populations over time.

Quantifying and Comparing Phylogenetic Evolutionary Rates for Shape and Other High-Dimensional Phenotypic Data

The phylogenetic effective sample size and jumps

e.g. population: 500, two alleles: Red (R) and White (r). Total: 1000 genes for flower color in the population

DNA-based species delimitation

Evolutionary Patterns, Rates, and Trends

The Use of Geometric Morphometrics in a Study of Shape Diversity of Ground Beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae)

Bootstrapping, Randomization, 2B-PLS

The concept of breeding value. Gene251/351 Lecture 5

I. Short Answer Questions DO ALL QUESTIONS

A. Incorrect! Form is a characteristic used in the morphological species concept.

Quantitative Genetics & Evolutionary Genetics

Quantitative characters II: heritability

Rapid evolution of the cerebellum in humans and other great apes

EVOLUTION change in populations over time

Welcome to Evolution 101 Reading Guide

Outline. Evolution: Speciation and More Evidence. Key Concepts: Evolution is a FACT. 1. Key concepts 2. Speciation 3. More evidence 4.

There are 3 parts to this exam. Take your time and be sure to put your name on the top of each page.

Measuring rates of phenotypic evolution and the inseparability of tempo and mode

BIOL Evolution. Lecture 9

Contents PART 1. 1 Speciation, Adaptive Radiation, and Evolution 3. 2 Daphne Finches: A Question of Size Heritable Variation 41

EVOLUTION change in populations over time

Chapter 5 Evolution of Biodiversity

Testing quantitative genetic hypotheses about the evolutionary rate matrix for continuous characters

Evolution & Natural Selection

Course ID May 2017 COURSE OUTLINE. Biology 102 (C-ID Number: BIOL 140) General Biology (C-ID Title: Organismal Biology)

5/31/2012. Speciation and macroevolution - Chapter

Name Date Class. Patterns of Evolution

Patterns in Evolution - Novelty

Patterns in Evolution - Novelty. Uses of Phylogenetic Analysis. Allows mapping order of character state changes

1.A- Natural Selection

Lecture 6: Selection on Multiple Traits

Anthropology Midterm Exam

Chapter 14 The Origin of Species

Predicting Fitness Effects of Beneficial Mutations in Digital Organisms

THE EVOLUTION OF POPULATIONS THE EVOLUTION OF POPULATIONS

Ecology and evolution. Limnology Lecture 2

EVOLUTION UNIT. 3. Unlike his predecessors, Darwin proposed a mechanism by which evolution could occur called.

Speciation. Today s OUTLINE: Mechanisms of Speciation. Mechanisms of Speciation. Geographic Models of speciation. (1) Mechanisms of Speciation

COMBINING GEOMETRIC MORPHOMETRICS AND FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS WITH EVOLUTIONARY MODELING: TOWARD A SYNTHESIS

Evolution. Just a few points

Variance Components: Phenotypic, Environmental and Genetic

Genetic assimilation can occur in the absence of selection for the assimilating phenotype, suggesting a role for the canalization heuristic

Quantitative characters - exercises

Understanding Natural Selection

MIPoD: A Hypothesis-Testing Framework for Microevolutionary Inference from Patterns of Divergence

Chapter 6: Beyond Brownian Motion Section 6.1: Introduction

Unit 9: Evolution Guided Reading Questions (80 pts total)

NOTES Ch 17: Genes and. Variation

D. Incorrect! That is what a phylogenetic tree intends to depict.

Transcription:

Quantitative evolution of morphology

Properties of Brownian motion evolution of a single quantitative trait Most likely outcome = starting value Variance of the outcomes = number of step * (rate parameter) 2 Outcomes are normally distributed (reason is Central Limit Theorem: each step adds a random variable, sum of many random variables forms a normal distribution)

Brownian motion function for 2 traits! #################################################################! #! # This function generates a Brownian-motion random walk! # in two traits for n number of generations. The default step! # variance is 1. Written by David Polly, 2008.! #! #################################################################!! randomwalk <- function(n,r=1) {! scores <- matrix(ncol=3, nrow=n)! scores[1,] <- c(1,0,0)! for (i in 2:n) {! scores[i,1]=i! scores[i,2]=scores[i-1,2]+rnorm(1, mean=0, sd=sqrt(r))! scores[i,3]=scores[i-1,3]+rnorm(1, mean=0, sd=sqrt(r))! }! return(as.data.frame(scores))! }!!

Quantitative evolutionary theory Change in phenotype Selection coefficients can be: Random Directional Stabilizing Etc. Selection coefficients Additive genetic variance covariance matrix Lande, R. 1979. Quantitative genetic analysis of multivariate evolution, applied to brain: body size allometry. Evolution, 33: 402-416.

To properly model evolution Additive genetic covariance matrix of traits for a single species Normally this is estimated from parent-offspring data Phenotypic covariance matrix (for a single species) can arguably be substituted Don t use covariance matrix based on multiple species because this confounds phenotypic covariances and phylogenetic covariances Use this covariance matrix to construct shape space Estimate step rates from phylogeny (e.g., Martins and Hansen, 1997; Gingerich, 1993, etc.)

Adaptive landscape Wright, 1932 (original concept for allele frequency and reproductive fitness) Simpson 1944 (phenotypic concept for macro evolution) Lande, 1976 (quantitative theory for phenotypes) Polly, P. D. 2004. On the simulation of the evolution of morphological shape: multivariate shape under selection and drift. Palaeontologia Electronica, 7.2.7A: 28pp, 2.3MB. http://palaeo-electronica.org/2004_2/evo/issue2_04.htm

Brownian motion analogous to evolution on a flat adaptive landscape where random bumps appear and disappear Shape model in landmark space PC scores in shape space Procrustes distance from ancestral (consensus) shape Polly, P. D. 2004. On the simulation of the evolution of morphological shape: multivariate shape under selection and drift. Palaeontologia Electronica, 7.2.7A: 28pp, 2.3MB. http://palaeo-electronica.org/2004_2/evo/issue2_04.htm

Directional selection analogous to a flat adaptive landscape that is tilted up in one direction Shape model in landmark space PC scores in shape space Procrustes distance from ancestral (consensus) shape Polly, P. D. 2004. On the simulation of the evolution of morphological shape: multivariate shape under selection and drift. Palaeontologia Electronica, 7.2.7A: 28pp, 2.3MB. http://palaeo-electronica.org/2004_2/evo/issue2_04.htm

Stabilizing selection analogous to classic adaptive peak Shape model in landmark space PC scores in shape space Procrustes distance from ancestral (consensus) shape Polly, P. D. 2004. On the simulation of the evolution of morphological shape: multivariate shape under selection and drift. Palaeontologia Electronica, 7.2.7A: 28pp, 2.3MB. http://palaeo-electronica.org/2004_2/evo/issue2_04.htm

Drift Perfectly flat landscape where change occurs by chance sampling from one generation to the next. Change is small and a function of population size (where population size is average number of breeding individuals in the species through the period of interest) Shape model in landmark space PC scores in shape space Procrustes distance from ancestral (consensus) shape Polly, P. D. 2004. On the simulation of the evolution of morphological shape: multivariate shape under selection and drift. Palaeontologia Electronica, 7.2.7A: 28pp, 2.3MB. http://palaeo-electronica.org/2004_2/evo/issue2_04.htm

The curvature and slope of a divergence graph depend on the type of selection and the rate of evolution Mode of selection Rate

Applied to hominin tooth shape Gómez-Robles, A. and P.D. Polly. 2012. Morphological integration in the hominin dentition: evolutionary, developmental, and functional factors. Evolution, 66: 1024-1043.

Possible issues with this kind of modeling: Does not model the gain or loss of features Presumes that trait covariances don t change Presumes that evolutionary transitions in phenotypes are continuous

New Frontiers: Alternative approaches Homology free geometric methods that can accommodate gain and loss of features Non-linear shape spaces that can be used to model interactions of genetic, developmental, and environmental effect Homologous landmarks Homology free outline semilandmarks Homology free surface semilandmarks Polly, 2008

Estimated trajectory of pinniped calcaneum evolution Polly, P. D. 2008. Adaptive Zones and the Pinniped Ankle: A 3D Quantitative Analysis of Carnivoran Tarsal Evolution. In (E. Sargis and M. Dagosto, Eds.) Mammalian Evolutionary Morphology: A Tribute to Frederick S. Szalay. Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

Further reading Adams, D. C. and M. L. Collyer. 2009. A general framework for the analysis of phenotypic trajectories in evolutionary studies. Evolution, 63: 1143-1154. Arnold, S. J., M. E. Pfrender, and A. G. Jones. 2001. The adaptive landscape as a conceptual bridge between micro- and macroevolution. Genetica, 112-113: 9-32. Felsenstein, J. 1988. Phylogenetics and quantitative characters. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 19: 445-471. Lande, R. 1976. Natural selection and random genetic drift in phenotypic evolution. Evolution, 30: 314-334. Lande, R. 1986. The dynamics of peak shifts and the pattern of morphological evolution. Paleobiology, 12: 343-354. Martins, E.P. and T.F. Hansen. 1997. Phylogenies and the comparative method: a general approach to incorporating phylogenetic information into the analysis of interspecific data. The American Naturalist, 148: 646-667. Polly, P. D. 2004. On the simulation of the evolution of morphological shape: multivariate shape under selection and drift. Palaeontologia Electronica, 7.2.7A: 28pp, 2.3MB. http://palaeo-electronica.org/2004_2/evo/issue2_04.htm Polly, P.D. 2008. Developmental dynamics and G-matrices: Can morphometric spaces be used to model evolution and development? Evolutionary Biology, 35, 83-96.