HOMOMORPHISMS OF VECTOR BUNDLES ON CURVES AND PARABOLIC VECTOR BUNDLES ON A SYMMETRIC PRODUCT

Similar documents
Stability of the Tangent Bundle of the Wonderful Compactification of an Adjoint Group

APPROXIMATE YANG MILLS HIGGS METRICS ON FLAT HIGGS BUNDLES OVER AN AFFINE MANIFOLD. 1. Introduction

NOTES ON HOLOMORPHIC PRINCIPAL BUNDLES OVER A COMPACT KÄHLER MANIFOLD

A Criterion for Flatness of Sections of Adjoint Bundle of a Holomorphic Principal Bundle over a Riemann Surface

MODULI SPACES OF CONNECTIONS ON A RIEMANN SURFACE

We can choose generators of this k-algebra: s i H 0 (X, L r i. H 0 (X, L mr )

PARABOLIC SHEAVES ON LOGARITHMIC SCHEMES

A GENERALIZED QUOT SCHEME AND MEROMORPHIC VORTICES

INDRANIL BISWAS AND GEORG HEIN

arxiv:math/ v1 [math.ag] 18 Oct 2003

The Atiyah bundle and connections on a principal bundle

PARABOLIC HIGGS BUNDLES AND Γ-HIGGS BUNDLES

A CRITERION FOR A DEGREE-ONE HOLOMORPHIC MAP TO BE A BIHOLOMORPHISM. 1. Introduction

1. Algebraic vector bundles. Affine Varieties

ON THE MAPPING CLASS GROUP ACTION ON THE COHOMOLOGY OF THE REPRESENTATION SPACE OF A SURFACE

Some Remarks on Prill s Problem

September 27, :51 WSPC/INSTRUCTION FILE biswas-loftin. Hermitian Einstein connections on principal bundles over flat affine manifolds

Infinite root stacks of logarithmic schemes

PRINCIPAL BUNDLES OVER PROJECTIVE MANIFOLDS WITH PARABOLIC STRUCTURE OVER A DIVISOR

THE MODULI OF SUBALGEBRAS OF THE FULL MATRIX RING OF DEGREE 3

Construction of M B, M Dol, M DR

LECTURE 6: THE ARTIN-MUMFORD EXAMPLE

Non-properness of the functor of F -trivial bundles

Pacific Journal of Mathematics

Representations and Linear Actions

Math 121 Homework 4: Notes on Selected Problems

Parabolic sheaves, root stacks and the Kato-Nakayama space

Vector Bundles on Algebraic Varieties

Coherent sheaves on elliptic curves.

Pacific Journal of Mathematics

Synopsis of material from EGA Chapter II, 4. Proposition (4.1.6). The canonical homomorphism ( ) is surjective [(3.2.4)].

ON A THEOREM OF CAMPANA AND PĂUN

An overview of D-modules: holonomic D-modules, b-functions, and V -filtrations

MATH 233B, FLATNESS AND SMOOTHNESS.

A p-adic GEOMETRIC LANGLANDS CORRESPONDENCE FOR GL 1

Chern classes à la Grothendieck

Polarized K3 surfaces of genus 18 and 20

Determinant Bundle in a Family of Curves, after A. Beilinson and V. Schechtman

Some remarks on symmetric correspondences

The Grothendieck Ring of Varieties

LECTURE 4: REPRESENTATION THEORY OF SL 2 (F) AND sl 2 (F)

Vector bundles in Algebraic Geometry Enrique Arrondo. 1. The notion of vector bundle

NOTES ON FLAT MORPHISMS AND THE FPQC TOPOLOGY

ON DEGENERATIONS OF MODULI OF HITCHIN PAIRS

2 G. D. DASKALOPOULOS AND R. A. WENTWORTH general, is not true. Thus, unlike the case of divisors, there are situations where k?1 0 and W k?1 = ;. r;d

DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY HOMI BHABHA NATIONAL INSTITUTE

arxiv:math/ v1 [math.ag] 24 Nov 1998

LINKED HOM SPACES BRIAN OSSERMAN

NOTES ON ABELIAN VARIETIES

On exceptional completions of symmetric varieties

Wild ramification and the characteristic cycle of an l-adic sheaf

Another proof of the global F -regularity of Schubert varieties

MODULI OF MATHEMATICAL INSTANTON VECTOR BUNDLES WITH ODD c 2 ON PROJECTIVE SPACE

h M (T ). The natural isomorphism η : M h M determines an element U = η 1

MA 206 notes: introduction to resolution of singularities

arxiv: v1 [math.ag] 16 Jan 2015

EQUIVARIANT COHOMOLOGY IN ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY LECTURE TWO: DEFINITIONS AND BASIC PROPERTIES

Normality of secant varieties

Non-uniruledness results for spaces of rational curves in hypersurfaces

Parameterizing orbits in flag varieties

Exercises of the Algebraic Geometry course held by Prof. Ugo Bruzzo. Alex Massarenti

Projective Schemes with Degenerate General Hyperplane Section II

ALGEBRAIC GROUPS JEROEN SIJSLING

ARITHMETICALLY COHEN-MACAULAY BUNDLES ON HYPERSURFACES

12. Linear systems Theorem Let X be a scheme over a ring A. (1) If φ: X P n A is an A-morphism then L = φ O P n

PERVERSE SHEAVES ON A TRIANGULATED SPACE

ON THE INTERSECTION THEORY OF QUOT SCHEMES AND MODULI OF BUNDLES WITH SECTIONS

1 Moduli spaces of polarized Hodge structures.

0.1 Spec of a monoid

F. LAYTIMI AND D.S. NAGARAJ

RIMS-1743 K3 SURFACES OF GENUS SIXTEEN. Shigeru MUKAI. February 2012 RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES. KYOTO UNIVERSITY, Kyoto, Japan

SPACES OF RATIONAL CURVES ON COMPLETE INTERSECTIONS

LECTURE 4.5: SOERGEL S THEOREM AND SOERGEL BIMODULES

V. SRINIVAS. h p,q (X)u p v q

Quantizations and classical non-commutative non-associative algebras

GLUING STABILITY CONDITIONS

Half the sum of positive roots, the Coxeter element, and a theorem of Kostant

ON LIFTS OF SOME PROJECTABLE VECTOR FIELDS ASSOCIATED TO A PRODUCT PRESERVING GAUGE BUNDLE FUNCTOR ON VECTOR BUNDLES

THE VORTEX EQUATION ON AFFINE MANIFOLDS. 1. Introduction

ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY I, FALL 2016.

LOCAL VS GLOBAL DEFINITION OF THE FUSION TENSOR PRODUCT

CHAPTER 0 PRELIMINARY MATERIAL. Paul Vojta. University of California, Berkeley. 18 February 1998

the complete linear series of D. Notice that D = PH 0 (X; O X (D)). Given any subvectorspace V H 0 (X; O X (D)) there is a rational map given by V : X

REPRESENTATION THEORY, LECTURE 0. BASICS

HARTSHORNE EXERCISES

SPACES OF RATIONAL CURVES IN COMPLETE INTERSECTIONS

REPRESENTATION THEORY WEEK 5. B : V V k

arxiv:math/ v1 [math.ag] 17 Oct 2006

Moduli stacks of vector bundles on curves and the King Schofield rationality proof

LECTURE 2: SYMPLECTIC VECTOR BUNDLES

Demushkin s Theorem in Codimension One

LECTURE 11: SOERGEL BIMODULES

MODULI OF SHEAVES, FOURIER-MUKAI TRANSFORM, AND PARTIAL DESINGULARIZATION

MODULI PROBLEMS AND GEOMETRIC INVARIANT THEORY

Noetherian property of infinite EI categories

NOTES ON PROCESI BUNDLES AND THE SYMPLECTIC MCKAY EQUIVALENCE

ALGEBRAIC GROUPS J. WARNER

arxiv: v2 [math.ra] 14 Sep 2016

arxiv:alg-geom/ v1 21 Mar 1996

ON SUBADDITIVITY OF THE LOGARITHMIC KODAIRA DIMENSION

Transcription:

PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 140, Number 9, September 2012, Pages 3017 3024 S 0002-9939(2012)11227-4 Article electronically published on January 24, 2012 HOMOMORPHISMS OF VECTOR BUNDLES ON CURVES AND PARABOLIC VECTOR BUNDLES ON A SYMMETRIC PRODUCT INDRANIL BISWAS AND SOURADEEP MAJUMDER (Communicated by Lev Borisov) Abstract. Let S n (X) be the symmetric product of an irreducible smooth complex projective curve X. Given a vector bundle E on X, thereisacorresponding parabolic vector bundle V E on S n (X). If E is nontrivial, it is known that V E is stable if and only if E is stable. We prove that H 0 (S n (X), Hom par (V E, V F ))=H 0 (X, F E ) (H 0 (X, F ) H 0 (X, E )). As a consequence, the map from a moduli space of vector bundles on X to the corresponding moduli space of parabolic vector bundles on S n (X) is injective. 1. Introduction Let X be an irreducible smooth complex projective curve. Fixing an integer n 2, let S n (X) bethen fold symmetric product of X. Let D S n (X) be the reduced irreducible divisor parametrizing nonreduced effective divisors of X of length n. Let q 1 : S n (X) X S n (X) and q 2 : S n (X) X X be the natural projections. The tautological hypersurface on S n (X) X will be denoted by Δ. Given a vector bundle E on X, define the vector bundle F(E) :=q 1 (O Δ OS n (X) X q2e) S n (X). This vector bundle F(E) has a natural parabolic structure over the divisor D; the parabolic weights are 0 and 1/2. (See [BL] for the construction of the parabolic structure.) This parabolic vector bundle will be denoted by V E. The parabolic vector bundle V E is semistable if and only if the vector bundle E is semistable [BL, Lemma 1.2]. If E is not the trivial vector bundle, then V E is stable if and only if E is stable [BL, Theorem 1.3]. Therefore, a morphism from a moduli space of vector bundles on X toamoduli space of parabolic vector bundles on S n (X) is obtained by sending any E to V E. Our aim here is to show that the above morphism is injective. For two parabolic vector bundles V and W on S n (X) with D as the parabolic divisor and underlying vector bundles V and W respectively, let Hom par (V,V ) be the vector bundle on S n (X) defined by the sheaf of homomorphisms from V to W preserving the parabolic structures. Received by the editors March 29, 2011. 2010 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 14F05, 14H60. Key words and phrases. Symmetric product, parabolic vector bundle, homomorphism, stability. c 2012 American Mathematical Society Reverts to public domain 28 years from publication 3017

3018 I. BISWAS AND S. MAJUMDER We prove the following (see Corollary 3.4): Theorem 1.1. Let E and F be stable vector bundles over X with degree(e)/rank(e) =degree(f )/rank(f ). Then if E F,and if E = F. H 0 (S n (X), Hom par (V E, V F )) = 0 dim H 0 (S n (X), Hom par (V E, V F )) = 1 In fact we show that for any vector bundles E and F on X, H 0 (S n (X), Hom par (V E, V F )) = H 0 (X, F E ) (H 0 (X, F) H 0 (X, E )). (See Theorem 3.3.) 2. Invariants of the tensor product Let X be an irreducible smooth projective curve defined over C. Take any integer n 2. For any i [1,n], let (2.1) p i : X n X be the projection to the i th factor. The group of permutations of {1,,n} will be denoted by Σ(n). There is a natural action of it on X n, (2.2) X n Σ(n) X n, that permutes the factors. If V 0 is a vector bundle on X, the above action of Σ(n) on X n has a natural lift to an action of Σ(n) on the vector bundle V 0 := p i V 0 X n which simply permutes the factors in the direct sum. Take two algebraic vector bundles V and W over X. Define V := p i V and W := p i W. As noted above, V and W are equipped with an action of Σ(n). formula says that H 0 (X n, V W)= H 0 (X n,p i V p j W ). Using the projection formula, we have i,j=1 (2.3) H 0 (X n,p i V p i W )=H 0 (X, V W ), and if i j, then (2.4) H 0 (X n,p i V p j W )=H 0 (X, V ) H 0 (X, W). The Künneth

HOMOMORPHISMS OF VECTOR BUNDLES ON CURVES 3019 Using these we get an embedding (2.5) Φ:H 0 (X, V W ) (H 0 (X, V ) H 0 (X, W)) = H 0 (X n, V W) that sends any s H 0 (X, V W )to p i s H 0 (X n,p i (V W )) and sends any u t H 0 (X, V ) H 0 (X, W) to (p i u) (p j t) (i,j) [1,n] [1,n];i j H 0 (X n,p i V p jw ) i,j=1 H 0 (X n,p i V p j W ) i,j=1 H 0 (X n,p i V p j W ) H 0 (X n,p i V p j W ). i,j=1 The actions of Σ(n) ofv and W together produce a linear action of Σ(n) on H 0 (X n, V W). Let H 0 (X n, V W) Σ(n) H 0 (X n, V W) be the space of invariants. Proposition 2.1. The homomorphism Φ in (2.5) is an isomorphism of H 0 (X, V W ) (H 0 (X, V ) H 0 (X, W)) with H 0 (X n, V W) Σ(n). Proof. From the construction of Φ it follows immediately that Φ(H 0 (X, V W ) (H 0 (X, V ) H 0 (X, W))) H 0 (X n, V W) Σ(n). Also, Φ is clearly injective. Consider the decomposition of the vector bundle (2.6) V W =( p i (V W )) ( (p i V ) (p j W )) into a direct sum of two vector bundles. Clearly, the action of Σ(n) onv W leaves the two direct summands (2.7) p i (V W ) and (p i V ) (p j W ) in (2.6) invariant. Since the second subbundle in (2.7) is Σ(n) invariant, the subspace (2.8) H 0 (X n, (p i V ) (p j W )) H 0 (X n, V W) is left invariant by the action of Σ(n) onh 0 (X n, V W).

3020 I. BISWAS AND S. MAJUMDER Let A be the complex vector space of dimension n 2 n given by the space of all functions α : {1,,n} {1,,n} C such that α(i, i) = 0 for all i [1, n]. The permutation action of Σ(n) on {1,,n} produces an action of Σ(n) ona. Consider the Σ(n) invariant subspace H 0 (X n, (p i V ) (p jw )) in (2.8). From (2.4) it follows that (2.9) ( H 0 (X n, (p i V ) (p j W ))) Σ(n) = A Σ(n) H 0 (X, V ) H 0 (X, W), where ( n H0 (X n, (p i V ) (p j W )))Σ(n) and A Σ(n) are the spaces of invariants. The space of invariants A Σ(n) is generated by the function ρ :[1,n] [1,n] C defined by (i,j) 1 δj i,whereδi j =0ifi jand δi i =1foralli. This follows from Burnside s theorem (see [La, p. 648] for Burnside s theorem). Therefore, we have (2.10) A Σ(n) = C ρ = C. From (2.9) and (2.10) we conclude that (2.11) ( H 0 (X n, (p i V ) (p jw ))) Σ(n) = H 0 (X, V ) H 0 (X, W). In view of (2.6) and (2.11), (2.12) H 0 (X n, V W) Σ(n) =( H 0 (X n,p i (V W ))) Σ(n) (H 0 (X, V ) H 0 (X, W)). Let B be the complex vector space of dimension n given by the space of all functions {1,,n} C. Let B 0 = C B be the line defined by the constant functions. The group Σ(n) has a natural action on B. From (2.12) and (2.3), (2.13) H 0 (X n, V W) Σ(n) =(B Σ(n) H 0 (X, V W )) (H 0 (X, V ) H 0 (X, W)). It can be shown that B Σ(n) = B 0, where B 0 is defined above. Indeed, this is an immediate corollary of Burnside s theorem mentioned above. Therefore, from (2.13), H 0 (X n, V W) Σ(n) = H 0 (X, V W ) (H 0 (X, V ) H 0 (X, W)). This completes the proof of the proposition.

HOMOMORPHISMS OF VECTOR BUNDLES ON CURVES 3021 3. Homomorphisms of vector bundles and parabolic vector bundles Let (3.1) f : X n X n /Σ(n) =:S n (X) be the quotient map to the symmetric product of X. Let E X be a vector bundle. The action of Σ(n) on the vector bundle (3.2) E := p i E produces an action of Σ(n) on the direct image f E; the morphism f E S n (X) is Σ(n) equivariant with Σ(n) acting trivially on S n (X). The invariant direct image (3.3) V E := (f E) Σ(n) f E is a locally free O Sn (X) module. Using the action of Σ(n)onE, a parabolic structure on the vector bundle V E is constructed (see [BL, Section 3]). This parabolic vector bundle will be denoted by V E. We will now quickly recall the description of V E. Let D S n (X) be the reduced irreducible divisor parametrizing all (z 1,,z n ) such that not all z i are distinct. The parabolic divisor for V E is D. Let D X n be the reduced divisor parametrizing all (z 1,,z n ) such that z i z j for some i,j [1,n]. So, f( D) = D. The action of Σ(n) one preserves the coherent subsheaf E O X n( D). Define the invariant direct image (3.4) V E := (f (E O X n( D))) Σ(n) f (E O X n( D)). Clearly, (3.5) V E V E. The parabolic bundle V E is defined as follows: (V E ) 1/2 = V E and (V E) 0 = V E (see [MY]). Therefore, the quasi parabolic filtration is a 1 step filtration, and it is constructed from (3.5); the parabolic weights are 1/2 and0. Let F be a vector bundle over X. Define the vector bundles (3.6) F := p i F and V F := (f F) Σ(n). Let V F be the parabolic vector bundle on S n (X), with V F as the underlying vector bundle and parabolic structure over D, obtained by substituting F for E in the above construction of V E. Define V F V E as done in (3.4). Let (3.7) Hom par (V E, V F ) Hom(V E, V F ) be the sheaf of homomorphisms compatible with the parabolic structures [MY], [MS]. We recall that a section T of Hom(V E, V F )=V F (V E ) defined over an open subset U S n (X) lies in Hom par (V E, V F ) if and only if T (V E U ) V F.

3022 I. BISWAS AND S. MAJUMDER Define the vector bundle (3.8) W E,F := p i F p j E X n. The actions of Σ(n) one and F together define an action of Σ(n) onw E,F. Define the vector bundle (3.9) W E,F := (f W E,F ) Σ(n) S n (X). Lemma 3.1. Let V F E be the vector bundle on S n (X) obtained by substituting F E for E in the construction of V E. There is a canonical injective homomorphism of O Sn (X) modules H : V F E W E,F Hom par (V E, V F ), where W E,F and Hom par (V E, V F ) are defined in (3.9) and (3.7) respectively. Proof. Consider E and F, defined in (3.2) and (3.6) respectively, equipped with action of Σ(n). From the constructions of V F E and W E,F it follows that V F E W E,F =(f (F E )) Σ(n). Note that F E = ( n p i (F E )) W E,F,whereW E,F is constructed in (3.8). Take any nonempty Zariski open subset U S n (X). Let (3.10) φ : E f 1 (U) F f 1 (U) be a homomorphism which intertwines the actions of Σ(n)onE f 1 (U) and F f 1 (U), where f is the quotient map in (3.1). Let D U := D f 1 (U) be the divisor on f 1 (U). Let (3.11) φ := φ Id : E f 1 (U) O f 1 (U)( D U ) F f 1 (U) O f 1 (U)( D U ) be the homomorphism, where Id is the identity automorphism of O f 1 (U)( D U ). The restriction of φ to the subsheaf E f 1 (U) O f 1 (U)( D U ) E f 1 (U) clearly coincides with φ. Since the action of Σ(n) onx n leaves D U invariant, we get an action of Σ(n) on O f 1 (U)( D U ). The actions of Σ(n) one f 1 (U) and O f 1 (U)( D U ) together produce an action of Σ(n) one f 1 (U) O f 1 (U)( D U ). Similarly, F f 1 (U) O f 1 (U)( D U ) is equipped with an action of Σ(n). Since φ in (3.10) is Σ(n) equivariant, it follows immediately that the homomorphism φ in (3.11) is also Σ(n) equivariant. Consequently, φ produces a section of Hom par (V E, V F )overu. Therefore, we have a homomorphism of O Sn (X) modules (3.12) H : V F E W E,F Hom par (V E, V F ) that sends any section φ of (f (F E )) Σ(n) = V F E W E,F

HOMOMORPHISMS OF VECTOR BUNDLES ON CURVES 3023 over some open subset U to the section of constructed above from φ. Hom par (V E, V F ) U Proposition 3.2. Take two vector bundles E and F on X. The homomorphism Ĥ : H 0 (S n (X), V F E ) H 0 (S n (X), W E,F ) H 0 (S n (X), Hom par (V E, V F )) given by H in Lemma 3.1 is an isomorphism. Proof. Since H is injective, the corresponding homomorphism Ĥ : H 0 (S n (X), V F E ) H 0 (S n (X), W E,F ) H 0 (S n (X), Hom par (V E, V F )) is also injective. So to prove that Ĥ is an isomorphism, it suffices to show that (3.13) dim H 0 (S n (X), Hom par (V E, V F )) dim H 0 (S n (X), V F E ) +dimh 0 (S n (X), W E,F ). From the construction of the vector bundle Hom par (V E, V F ) in (3.7) it follows that Hom par (V E, V F ) (f (F E )) Σ(n) f (F E ), where E and F are constructed in (3.2) and (3.6) respectively. Consequently, H 0 (S n (X), Hom par (V E, V F )) H 0 (X n,f (F E )) Σ(n). Hence setting V and W in Proposition 2.1 to be F and E respectively we conclude that H 0 (S n (X), Hom par (V E, V F )) H 0 (X n,f (F E )) Σ(n) (3.14) = H 0 (X, F E ) (H 0 (X, F) H 0 (X, E )). On the other hand, (3.15) H 0 (X, F E ) (H 0 (X, F) H 0 (X, E )) H 0 (S n (X), V F E ) H 0 (S n (X), W E,F ). Indeed, H 0 (X, F E ) H 0 (S n (X), V F E )and H 0 (X, F) H 0 (X, E ) H 0 (S n (X), W E,F ). Combining (3.14) and (3.15), H 0 (S n (X), Hom par (V E, V F )) H 0 (S n (X), V F E ) H 0 (S n (X), W E,F ). Therefore, we conclude that the inequality in (3.13) holds. This completes the proof of the proposition. Theorem 3.3. There is a canonical isomorphism H 0 (S n (X), Hom par (V E, V F )) H 0 (X, F E ) (H 0 (X, F) H 0 (X, E )). Proof. From Proposition 3.2, dim H 0 (S n (X), Hom par (V E, V F )) = dim H 0 (S n (X), V F E ) +dimh 0 (S n (X), W E,F ),

3024 I. BISWAS AND S. MAJUMDER and from (3.15), dim H 0 (X, F E )+dim(h 0 (X, F) H 0 (X, E )) dim H 0 (S n (X), V F E )+dimh 0 (S n (X), W E,F ). Consequently, dim H 0 (X, F E )+dim(h 0 (X, F) H 0 (X, E )) dim H 0 (S n (X), Hom par (V E, V F )). On the other hand, dim H 0 (S n (X), Hom par (V E, V F )) dim H 0 (X, F E ) + dim(h 0 (X, F) H 0 (X, E )) (see (3.14)). Combining these we conclude that h 0 (S n (X), Hom par (V E, V F )) = h 0 (X, F E )+h 0 (X, F) h 0 (X, E )). Therefore, the subspace H 0 (S n (X), Hom par (V E, V F )) in (3.14) coincides with the ambient space H 0 (X, F E ) (H 0 (X, F) H 0 (X, E )). Corollary 3.4. Let E and F be stable vector bundles over X with degree(e)/rank(e) =degree(f )/rank(f ). Then H 0 (S n (X), Hom par (V E, V F )) = 0 if E F,and dim H 0 (S n (X), Hom par (V E, V F )) = 1 if E = F. Proof. If degree(f ) 0, then H 0 (X, F) = 0 because F is stable. If degree(f ) > 0, then H 0 (X, E ) = 0 because E is stable with degree(e ) < 0. Therefore, H 0 (X, F) H 0 (X, E ) = 0. Hence the corollary follows from Theorem 3.3. References [BL] I. Biswas and F. Laytimi, Direct image and parabolic structure on symmetric product of curves, Jour. Geom. Phys. 61 (2011), 773 780. MR2765403 [La] S. Lang, Algebra, Third Edition, Springer, 2002. MR1878556 (2003e:00003) [MY] M. Maruyama and K. Yokogawa, Moduli of parabolic stable sheaves, Math. Ann. 293 (1992), 77 99. MR1162674 (93d:14022) [MS] V. B. Mehta and C. S. Seshadri, Moduli of vector bundles on curves with parabolic structures, Math. Ann. 248 (1980), 205 239. MR575939 (81i:14010) School of Mathematics, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Homi Bhabha Road, Mumbai 400005, India E-mail address: indranil@math.tifr.res.in School of Mathematics, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Homi Bhabha Road, Mumbai 400005, India E-mail address: souradip@math.tifr.res.in