Napa County Comprehensive Groundwater Monitoring Program 2015 Annual Report and CASGEM Update

Similar documents
Napa Valley Groundwater Sustainability: A Basin Analysis Report for the Napa Valley Subbasin

Napa Valley Groundwater Sustainability: A Basin Analysis Report for the Napa Valley Subbasin

Mark S. Nordberg Geology and Groundwater Investigations Section North Central Region Office California Department of Water Resources

DRAFT. REVISED Draft. Paso Robles Subbasin Groundwater Sustainability Plan Chapter 6

January 25, Summary

REDWOOD VALLEY SUBAREA

Hydrogeology and Simulated Effects of Future Water Use and Drought in the North Fork Red River Alluvial Aquifer: Progress Report

Cuyama Basin North Fork Vineyard

Illinois Drought Update, December 1, 2005 DROUGHT RESPONSE TASK FORCE Illinois State Water Survey, Department of Natural Resources

Wisconsin s Hydrogeology: an overview

2. PHYSICAL SETTING FINAL GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN. 2.1 Topography. 2.2 Climate

Hydrogeology of Karst NE Wisconsin. Dr. Maureen A. Muldoon UW-Oshkosh Geology Department

The mountain is permeable and fractured: Hydrological Connectivity in the Laramie Range

Chiang Rai Province CC Threat overview AAS1109 Mekong ARCC

MEMORANDUM. Jerry Conrow, Ojai Basin Groundwater Management Agency

LAUREL MARCUS California Land Stewardship Institute OVERVIEW OF GROUNDWATER STUDIES IN THE RUSSIAN RIVER WATERSHED

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM: MADERA SUBBASIN. Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA) DRAFT PRELIMINARY BASIN BOUNDARY WATER BUDGET.

3.1 Basin Description

Technical Memorandum. 1 Study Area. Interbasin Groundwater Flow Evaluation

Sacramento Valley Groundwater Basin, Sutter Subbasin

Tule Subbasin: Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA) August 24, 2016 David De Groot, Professional Engineer 4Creeks, Inc.

12 SWAT USER S MANUAL, VERSION 98.1

East Bay Plain Basin. EBMUD & City of Hayward. Groundwater Reliability Partnership Meeting March 22, 2017

Great Lakes Update. Volume 193: 2015 January through June Summary. Vol. 193 Great Lakes Update August 2015

WORKING DRAFT List of Figures Groundwater Sustainability Plan for Santa Rosa Plain Subbasin. Figure Number. Figure Title

Napa Watershed Water Year Classification Methodology 1

C2VSim Fine Grid (C2VSim-FG) Version Development & Applications

Betsy Stevenson and Allison Mohrs (Skagit County Planning and Development Services) Jenny Baker, The Nature Conservancy

Hydrogeologic Conceptual Models for Regional Flow Systems

Lower Tuolumne River Accretion (La Grange to Modesto) Estimated daily flows ( ) for the Operations Model Don Pedro Project Relicensing

NATIONAL HYDROPOWER ASSOCIATION MEETING. December 3, 2008 Birmingham Alabama. Roger McNeil Service Hydrologist NWS Birmingham Alabama

Great Lakes Update. Volume 194: 2015 Annual Summary

Groundwater in Bayfield County

Executive Summary. Water Quantity

Hydrologic budget of the ORW mitigation wetland, 2002

Impact of the Danube River on the groundwater dynamics in the Kozloduy Lowland

Santa Clara Valley Water District Page 1 of 4

Shasta Valley Groundwater Basin Boundary Modification

A Review of the 2007 Water Year in Colorado

Appendix G. Summary of Hydrogeologic Conditions and Historical Mining Northwest of the Centro Subarea in the Randsburg, Red Mountain, and Atolia Area

2.5.3 Willow Creek Valley

Evaluation of the hydraulic gradient at an island for low-level nuclear waste disposal

February 10, Mr. Jeff Smith, Chairman Imperial Valley Water Authority E County Road 1000 N Easton, IL Dear Chairman Smith:

CW3E Atmospheric River Update

NIDIS Intermountain West Regional Drought Early Warning System February 7, 2017

Missouri River Basin Water Management

Presentation Overview. Southwestern Climate: Past, present and future. Global Energy Balance. What is climate?

Appendix G: Supplemental Water Supply Information

Great Lakes Update. Volume 188: 2012 Annual Summary

Critical Aquifer Recharge Area Susceptibility Index Methodology

Hydrogeology of the San Agustin Plains

National Integrated Drought Information System. Southeast US Pilot for Apalachicola- Flint-Chattahoochee River Basin 20-March-2012

11/22/2010. Groundwater in Unconsolidated Deposits. Alluvial (fluvial) deposits. - consist of gravel, sand, silt and clay

Information Pamphlet 8 WATER LEVELS IN THE UPPER WEST BENCH ALLUVIAL AQUIFER, RED LODGE, MONTANA

NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE

Merced Groundwater Sustainability Plan. Public Meeting August 2, 2018

MOJAVE BASIN AREA WATERMASTER SUMMARY REPORT SUBSURFACE FLOW BETWEEN SUBAREAS

Climatic Change Implications for Hydrologic Systems in the Sierra Nevada

PRELIMINARY. Select Geophysical Methods and Groundwater Modeling: Examples from USGS studies. Claudia Faunt and a cast of others

APPENDIX E Groundwater Information

Study of Hydrometeorology in a Hard Rock Terrain, Kadirischist Belt Area, Anantapur District, Andhra Pradesh

PH YSIC A L PROPERT IE S TERC.UCDAVIS.EDU

Drought Monitoring in Mainland Portugal

Water Quality and Water Quantity: Two sides of the Same Coin. Chris Jones

Simulation of hydrologic and water quality processes in watershed systems using linked SWAT-MODFLOW-RT3D model

Stream Discharge and the Water Budget

PHYSICAL PROPERTIES TAHOE.UCDAVIS.EDU 8

Climate Change and Water Supply Research. Drought Response Workshop October 8, 2013

INTRODUCTION. LOCATION OF THE STUDY AREA. DRILLING HISTORY OF THE AREA. GEOLOGY AND HYDROGEOLOGY OF THE AREA. HYDROLOGY OF THE AREA.

APPENDIX G. Groundwater Basin Descriptions and Discussion on Groundwater Operational Yield

Upper Missouri River Basin December 2017 Calendar Year Runoff Forecast December 5, 2017

Climate Change Impact on Drought Risk and Uncertainty in the Willamette River Basin

Climate Change and Water Supplies in the West. Michael Dettinger, USGS

Water Supply Conditions and Outlook June 4, 2018

GAM Run by Ali H. Chowdhury Ph.D., P.G. Texas Water Development Board Groundwater Resources Division (512)

NIDIS Intermountain West Drought Early Warning System February 12, 2019

Webinar and Weekly Summary February 15th, 2011

Changing Hydrology under a Changing Climate for a Coastal Plain Watershed

Water Resources Challenges in Adams County, Pennsylvania

The use of 18 0 as a groundwater tracer in the Marlborough Region

Three main areas of work:

Highlights of the 2006 Water Year in Colorado

Hydrologic Conditions in the Delaware River Basin

Projected Impacts of Climate Change in Southern California and the Western U.S.

IDAWRA: Groundwater-flow model for the Wood River Valley aquifer system, south-central Idaho February 1, 2017, 11:30-1:00

NIDIS Intermountain West Drought Early Warning System April 18, 2017

3.1 Regional Physical Setting

National Integrated Drought Information System Southeast US Pilot for Apalachicola- Flint-Chattahoochee River Basin. 22 May 2012

Hydrogeology of East-Central Union County, Northeastern New Mexico

Precipitation. Standardized Precipitation Index. NIDIS Intermountain West Regional Drought Early Warning System January 3, 2017

Climate Impacts to Southwest Water Sector. Dr. Dave DuBois New Mexico State Climatologist

Soils, Hydrogeology, and Aquifer Properties. Philip B. Bedient 2006 Rice University

Upper Missouri River Basin February 2018 Calendar Year Runoff Forecast February 6, 2018

Pajaro Valley Hydrologic Model Base-Case Scenario

Diagnostic Geomorphic Methods for Understanding Future Behavior of Lake Superior Streams What Have We Learned in Two Decades?

Becky Bolinger Water Availability Task Force November 13, 2018

Water Supply Conditions and Outlook October 1, 2018

Big Wood River. General Information

Butte County Drought Task Force December 1, :00 AM noon 202 Mira Loma Drive, Tahoe Room Oroville, CA. Agenda

9. PROBABLE MAXIMUM PRECIPITATION AND PROBABLE MAXIMUM FLOOD

Transcription:

Napa County Comprehensive Groundwater Monitoring Program 2015 Annual Report and CASGEM Update April 21, 2016 Watershed Information & Conservation Council By Vicki Kretsinger Grabert

Overview Evolving groundwater monitoring program Background Highlights 2015 Annual Report GW-SW interaction GW Quality Summary and next steps

Groundwater Basins Napa Sonoma Valley Basin Napa Valley Subbasin Napa-Sonoma Lowlands Subbasin Berryessa Valley Basin Pope Valley Basin Suisun-Fairfield Valley Basin The MST is located largely outside of DWRdesignated basins.

Groundwater Basins: Initial SGMA Prioritization Napa Sonoma Valley Basin Napa Valley Subbasin (Med) Napa-Sonoma Lowlands Subbasin (VL) Berryessa Valley Basin(VL) Pope Valley Basin(VL) Suisun-Fairfield Valley Basin(VL) Medium Very Low

Napa Subareas 17 Subareas Napa Valley Floor includes 5 Subareas Based on: Watershed Boundaries Groundwater Basins Planning Subareas

Subsurface Geology Very Complex in Napa Valley Especially Complex in Hillsides Sedimentary Alluvium Sonoma Volcanics 6

Water Budget: Core Element of Groundwater Sustainability Inflows Outflows = S Change in GW Storage 7

Water Budgets Involve More than the Groundwater Basin Precipitation: PRISM 800 Meter Grid Watershed: Upper Napa River Near Napa

New Climate Ready Study (including future scenarios) Pepperwood Preserve (January 2016): Avg. Annual Recharge 76,678 AF Watershed Water Budget: Napa River Near Napa Precipitation: >400,000 AF/Yr (Avg.) Recharge: ~ 70,600 AF/Yr (Avg.) Pumping: ~21,300 AF/yr (2004) LSCE and MBK, Napa Hydrogeologic Characterization, 2013 Estimated Groundwater Pumping: 21,300 acrefeet (2050 Study; Upper Napa Valley)

Water Budgets Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA) likely to require for Plans Updated water budgets already underway for Napa Valley Subbasin Over hydrologic base period Represent different water year types (drier, normal, wetter) Current Future

GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS: Highlights 2015 Annual Report Focus is on monitoring results Different from SGMA efforts

Groundwater Elevation (ft., msl) Precipitation (in.) Groundwater Conditions: Napa Valley Subbasin 200 160 120 80 40 0-40 Dry Years St. Helena Yountville Napa 60 Napa Precipitation 50 40 30 20 10 0 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 12

GW Level Monitoring, 2015 Napa Co., 100 (incld. 48 volun., 10 SW/GW) DWR, 4 GeoTracker, 9 Total Wells = 113 Sites

Groundwater Monitoring Direct Connection Can Contribute to Streamflow Courtesy TNC Unconfined Indirect Connection Stream Seepage Independent of GW Levels Confined Courtesy TNC

Depth to Groundwater Feet below ground surface 0 to 10 ft Water table (Valley Floor) generally very shallow; basin quite full 15

MST Subarea 16

Northeast Napa Area: Spring 2015

Groundwater/Surface Water Interaction

Historical Observations (USGS WRI 13-73, 1973) Historically, streamflows in Napa Valley varied considerably season to season and year to year Changes relatively large because of large seasonal variations in rainfall GW levels not changed significantly over time During periods of limited precipitation, GW levels declined and stream discharges reduced significantly.

Historical Days of No Streamflow Conn Creek near Oakville 1930s 1940s 1970s Napa River near Napa 1930s 1960s 1970s 2012-2015

Surface Water/ 5 Groundwater Monitoring at 5 Sites Shallow MWs each site Levels & quality Stream gauge each site Streamflow & quality Depths to water (when drilled) ranged from 16 34 ft [20ft at St. Helena] 4 2 3 1

GW Monitoring Wells Near River 2-inch dia. casings Looking Down at MWs Sand and Gravel Above Ground Locked Protection Below Ground Nested Monitoring Wells 40 ft Deep 2-inch dia. casings Not to Scale Sand 100 ft Deep

SW/GW Interaction: Site 5: St. Helena, Oct. 2014 & Dec. 2014 D S 206.08ft WL Elev., msl December 185.85ft 189.04ft October 173.05ft 40ft TD Elevation of Thalweg 196.00ft, msl GW above in Dec. 2014 100ftTD Not drawn to scale GW below in Oct. 2014

SW/GW Interaction: Site 5 St. Helena River Monitoring Active Supply Well GW Monitoring

SW/GW Interaction: Site 5 St. Helena Not to Scale River Streambed Shallow MW Deep MW WL Difference Shallow and Deep Oct. 2015 = 17 ft.

SW/GW Interaction: Site 4 Yountville Shallow MW Deep MW Streambed River

SW/GW Site 4 Compared to Historical GW Levels Napa County-133: 120 ft deep spring manual measurements (orange), all other manual measurements (black) 133: October 2015 Shallow & Deep MWs Near River Precipitation (in.) 60 50 Napa Precipitation 40 30 20 10 0 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 Different Scale

GW Quality Data 78 Sites Additional Countysampled sites recommended

Nitrate Low NO 3 -N conc. MCL = 10 mg/l

TDS Generally low TDS VF May be susceptible to seawater intrusion from San Pablo Bay Elevated chloride, EC/TDS levels TDS much higher on avg south of VF than in the VF Probably originates from connate water in marine rocks; tidal influence Secondary MCL= 500/1,000 mg/l

TDS Trends Long historical records (from 1960/70s) Generally stable trends

Summary of GW Quality Conditions Generally Good GW Quality Selected Areas of Nat ly Occurring Elevated Constituents Calistoga Area of the Napa Valley Floor Geothermal influences Southern Napa County Elevated TDS and Chloride; likely naturally occurring; need additional monitoring to evaluate trends 32

Summary GW level trends stable majority of wells Napa Valley Floor Year-to-year declines observed in a few wells DWR (Update 2013): GW levels in well on VF, stable trend is generally indicative of wells located within the Napa Valley area Some response to drought conditions GW level declines in MST mostly moderated since 2008 Overall, on a basin wide scale, groundwater conditions in the Napa Valley Subbasin are good and similar to conditions reported decades ago.

Napa County and Next Steps Towards Groundwater Sustainability Ongoing (and evolving) SW and GW monitoring NE Napa area study Enhancing understanding of SW/GW interaction Conducting education and outreach Sustainable Groundwater Management Act, work in progress Water budgets, different water year types Water Education Foundation Groundwater Tour, Fall 2015

Thank You

Northeast Napa Study Area MST Area

North Napa

South Napa