Petroleum Engineering 324 Well Performance Daily Summary Sheet Spring 2009 Blasingame/Ilk. Date: Materials Covered in Class Today: Comment(s):

Similar documents
Petroleum Engineering 324 Well Performance Daily Summary Sheet Spring 2009 Blasingame/Ilk. Date: Materials Covered in Class Today: Comment(s):

Petroleum Engineering 324 Well Performance Daily Summary Sheet Spring 2009 Blasingame/Ilk. Date: Materials Covered in Class Today: Comment(s):

Petroleum Engineering 324 Well Performance Daily Summary Sheet Spring 2009 Blasingame/Ilk. Date: Materials Covered in Class Today: Comment(s):

READ THIS PAGE COMPLETELY BEFORE STARTING

Petroleum Engineering 324 Well Performance Daily Summary Sheet Spring 2009 Blasingame/Ilk. Date: Materials Covered in Class Today: Comment(s):

Dimensionless Wellbore Storage Coefficient: Skin Factor: Notes:

Petroleum Engineering 324 Well Performance Daily Summary Sheet Spring 2009 Blasingame/Ilk. Date: Materials Covered in Class Today: Comment(s):

Petroleum Engineering 324 Well Performance PRACTICE Final Examination (Well "B") 05 May 2003 (08:00-10:00 a.m. RICH 302)

Petroleum Engineering 324 Well Performance Daily Summary Sheet Spring 2009 Blasingame/Ilk. Date: Materials Covered in Class Today: Comment(s):

Petroleum Engineering 324 Reservoir Performance. Objectives of Well Tests Review of Petrophysics Review of Fluid Properties 29 January 2007

Petroleum Engineering 324 Reservoir Performance. Objectives of Well Tests Review of Petrophysics Review of Fluid Properties 19 January 2007

Petroleum Engineering 324 Reservoir Performance. Material Balance 16 February 2007

PET467E-Analysis of Well Pressure Tests 2008 Spring/İTÜ HW No. 5 Solutions

Analysis of Pressure Transient Response for an Injector under Hydraulic Stimulation at the Salak Geothermal Field, Indonesia

Pressure Transient Analysis COPYRIGHT. Introduction to Pressure Transient Analysis. This section will cover the following learning objectives:

SPE Uncertainty in rock and fluid properties.

THEORETICAL RESERVOIR MODELS

SPE Copyright 1997, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Inc.

Petroleum Engineering 613 Natural Gas Engineering. Texas A&M University. Lecture 07: Wellbore Phenomena

Presentation of MSc s Thesis

Far East Journal of Applied Mathematics

The SPE Foundation through member donations and a contribution from Offshore Europe

Evaluation and Forecasting Performance of Naturally Fractured Reservoir Using Production Data Inversion.

The evaluative methods on shale gas productivity using the DFIT

Propagation of Radius of Investigation from Producing Well

Introduction to Well Stimulation

PVT Concepts (Reservoir Fluids)

Use of Analytical Models in Prospect Evaluation of Gas Hydrate Reservoirs Mehran Pooladi-Darvish

SPE Direct Estimation of Gas Reserves Using Production Data. I.M. Buba, Texas A&M U. T.A. Blasingame, Texas A&M U.

Tom BLASINGAME Texas A&M U. Slide 1

Reservoir Flow Properties Fundamentals COPYRIGHT. Introduction

Rate Transient Analysis COPYRIGHT. Introduction. This section will cover the following learning objectives:

MATH 152, Fall 2017 COMMON EXAM II - VERSION A

Measure Twice Frac Once

(Formation Evaluation and the Analysis of Reservoir Performance) Module for: Analysis of Reservoir Performance. Introduction

IMPROVING LONG-TERM PRODUCTION DATA ANALYSIS USING ANALOGS TO PRESSURE TRANSIENT ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES

Module for: Analysis of Reservoir Performance Introduction

The SPE Foundation through member donations and a contribution from Offshore Europe

Perspectives on the Interpretation of Flowback Data from Wells in Shale Reservoir Systems

A Quadratic Cumulative Production Model for the Material Balance of Abnormally-Pressured Gas Reservoirs

Figure 1 - Gauges Overlay & Difference Plot

Recent Work in Well Performance Analysis for Tight Gas Sands and Gas Shales

A NEW SERIES OF RATE DECLINE RELATIONS BASED ON THE DIAGNOSIS OF RATE-TIME DATA

National yams May Pet-B2, Nahiral Gas Engineering. 3 hours duration NOTES:

AFTER CLOSURE ANALYSIS OF THE LINEAR FLOW REGIME IN A FRACTURE CALIBRATION TEST. A Thesis ZIWENJUE YE

XYZ COMPANY LTD. Prepared For: JOHN DOE. XYZ et al Knopcik 100/ W5/06 PAS-TRG. Dinosaur Park Formation

Flow of Non-Newtonian Fluids within a Double Porosity Reservoir under Pseudosteady State Interporosity Transfer Conditions

Math 151, Fall 2018 Common Exam 1 Version A

Exam #2: Fluid Kinematics and Conservation Laws April 13, 2016, 7:00 p.m. 8:40 p.m. in CE 118

PRINT. 4. Be sure to write your name, section and version letter of the exam on the Scantron form.

Rate Transient Analysis Theory/Software Course

MATH 152, Fall 2017 COMMON EXAM III - VERSION A

MATH 152, Fall 2017 COMMON EXAM III - VERSION B

Before beginning, I would like to acknowledge the amazing contributions of Ken Nolte. I suspect that the origins of most of our discussion during

Faculty of Science and Technology MASTER S THESIS

WATER INFLUX. Hassan S. Naji, Professor,

TAMU Spring Math 151, Spring 2019 Common Exam 1 Version A

Exam 1 KEY MATH 142 Summer 18 Version A. Name (printed):

Non-Darcy Skin Effect with a New Boundary Condition

Reservoir Engineering Aspects of Unconventional Reservoirs A Brief Introduction

SPE ATCE 2013 Special Session So We Frac'd the Well, Now What? Reservoir Engineering Aspects of Unconventional Reservoirs

(Page 2 of 7) Reservoir Petrophysics: Introduction to Geology (continued) Be familiar with Reservoir Petrophysics (continued)... Slides Reservoi

2. Standing's Method for Present IPR

MATERIAL BALANCE CALCULATIONS FOR PETROLEUM RESERVOIRS

Pressure-Transient Behavior of DoublePorosity Reservoirs with Transient Interporosity Transfer with Fractal Matrix Blocks

Inflow Performance 1

SPE Copyright 2003, Society of Petroleum Engineers Inc.


Jim Lambers ENERGY 281 Spring Quarter Homework Assignment 3 Solution. 2 Ei r2 D., 4t D and the late time approximation to this solution,

Exam 1 MATH 142 Summer 18 Version A. Name (printed):

Condensate banking vs Geological Heterogeneity who wins? Hamidreza Hamdi Mahmoud Jamiolahmady Patrick Corbett SPE

CIVIL 3136 TAMU College Station, Texas (979) FAX (979) CVEN

MATH 151, FALL 2017 COMMON EXAM III - VERSION B

Reservoir Engineering Aspects of Unconventional Reservoirs

Well Test Interpretation

GREEN WELL TESTING A REPORT SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF PETROLEUM ENGINEERING OF STANFORD UNIVERSITY

Spring 2018 Exam 1 MARK BOX HAND IN PART NAME: PIN:

Reservoir Management Background OOIP, OGIP Determination and Production Forecast Tool Kit Recovery Factor ( R.F.) Tool Kit

A Course in Fluid Flow in Petroleum Reservoirs Syllabus Thomas A. Blasingame Petroleum Engineering/Texas A&M University Spring 2005

Flow equations The basic equation, on which all flow equations are based, is Darcy s Law for radial flow is given by: p

Perforation Inflow Test Analysis (PITA)

MATH 151, FALL 2017 COMMON EXAM I - VERSION A

Dynamic Flow Analysis

Radius of Investigation for Reserve Estimation From Pressure Transient Well Tests

TRANSIENT AND PSEUDOSTEADY-STATE PRODUCTIVITY OF HYDRAULICALLY FRACTURED WELL. A Thesis ARDHI HAKIM LUMBAN GAOL

MATH 152, SPRING 2017 COMMON EXAM I - VERSION A

A modern concept simplifying the interpretation of pumping tests M. Stundner, G. Zangl & F. Komlosi

Two Questions and Three Equations on Distance of Investigation

IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON

Exam III, March 27, 2012, 100 pts Polymer Chemistry, CHEM 466, Spring 2012 Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA

Study of early dynamic evaluation methods in complex small fault-block reservoirs

Final Exam, May 2, 2014, 100 pts Polymer Chemistry, CHEM 466, Spring 2014 Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA

A Physics-Based Data-Driven Model for History Matching, Prediction and Characterization of Unconventional Reservoirs*

Oil and Gas Well Performance

National Exams May 2016

Optimization of Plunger Lift Performance in Stripper Gas Wells during the Period 05/15/2001 to 11/30/2002

OPTIMIZATION OF GEOTHERMAL WELL STIMULATION DESIGN USING A GEOMECHANICAL RESERVOIR SIMULATOR

WELL TEST ANALYSIS OF A MULTILAYERED RESERVOIR WITH FORMATION CROSSFLOW. a dissertation. and the committee on graduate studies. of stanford university

MULTI-PHASE PRODUCTION FORECASTING BUBBLE POINT DEATH? DAVID S. FULFORD JANUARY 10, 2018 SOCIETY OF PETROLEUM EVALUATION ENGINEERS MIDLAND CHAPTER

Test 3 Version A. On my honor, I have neither given nor received inappropriate or unauthorized information at any time before or during this test.

Transcription:

Petroleum Engineering 324 Well Performance Daily Summary Sheet Sring 2009 Blasingame/Ilk Date: Materials Covered in Class Today: Comment(s):

Pressure Transient Analysis Pressure Buildu Test Analysis Lee Text Examle 2.2 Thomas A. Blasingame, Ph.D., P.E. Deartment of Petroleum Engineering Texas A&M University College Station, TX 77843-3116 (USA) +1.979.845.2292 t-blasingame@tamu.edu

Notes:

Pressure Buildu Test Analysis: Lee Ex. 2.2 Given: These attached data were taken from a ressure buildu test erformed on an oil reservoir the reservoir is assumed to be homogeneous. Reservoir roerties: φ0.039 i 4600 sia r w 0.198 ft h69 ft c t 20x10-6 sia -1 A150 acres (square reservoir) Oil roerties: B1.136 RB/STB μ0.80 c Production arameters: q250 STB/D t 13,630 hr

Log-Log Plot: Flow Regime Identification d Δ' Δt ws and for radial flow only, ( Δ' ) rf dδt 1 ln(10) m sl

Log-Log Plot: Flow Regime Identification d Δ' Δt ws and for radial flow only, ( Δ' ) rf dδt 1 ln(10) m sl

Log-Log Plot: Flow Regime Identification Wellbore Storage Coefficient, C s : C s qb 24m wbs (250 STB/D) (1.136 RB/STB) 24 (970 si/hr) 0.0122 RB/si Permeability, k: k qbμ 1 (250 STB/D) (1.136 RB/STB) (0.8 c) 1 70.6 70.6 h [ Δ ' ] (69 ft) (30 si) rf 7.65 md Δ' rf 30 si (from the lot) m sl ln( 10) x Δ' rf 70 si/cycle

Wellbore Storage: Cartesian Plot ws wf (Δt 0) + mwbs Δt

Wellbore Storage: Cartesian Plot ws wf (Δt 0) + mwbs Δt

Wellbore Storage: Cartesian Plot Wellbore Storage Coefficient, C s : C s qb 24m wbs (250 STB/D) (1.136 RB/STB) 24 (970 si/hr) 0.0122 RB/si Pressure at the instant of shut-in, wf (Δt0): wf ( Δt 0) 702 sia ws ( Δt 0) wf + m wbs Δt

Infinite-Acting Radial Flow (IARF): Semilog Plot

Infinite-Acting Radial Flow (IARF): Semilog Plot

Infinite-Acting Radial Flow (IARF): Semilog Plot Permeability, k: k qbμ (250 STB/D) (1.136 RB/STB) (0.8 c) 162.6 162.6 m h (70 si/cycle) (69 ft) Skin Factor, s: ws,1hr wf s 1.1513 m sl sl ( Δt (1451 sia) (702 sia) s 1.1513 (70 si/cycle) s 6.25 0) k log + 3.2275 2 φμct rw 7.65 (7.65 md) log 6 1 2 (0.039) (0.8 c) (20x10 si ) (0.198 md NOTE: m sl IS FORCED FROM THE LOG-LOG PLOT. + 3.2275 2 ft)

Infinite-Acting Radial Flow (IARF): Horner Plot qbμ t Δt qbμ k ws wf ( Δt 0) 162.6 log + 162.6 log 3.2275 + 0. 8686s kh t + Δt kh φμct r 2 w

Infinite-Acting Radial Flow (IARF): Horner Plot qbμ t Δt qbμ k ws wf ( Δt 0) 162.6 log + 162.6 log 3.2275 + 0. 8686s kh t + Δt kh φμct r 2 w

Infinite-Acting Radial Flow (IARF): Horner Plot Permeability, k: k qbμ (250 STB/D) (1.136 RB/STB) (0.8 c) 162.6 162.6 m h (70 si/cycle) (69 ft) Skin Factor, s: s 1.1513 sl ws,1hr wf msl ( Δt (1451sia) (702 sia) s 1.1513 (70 si/cycle) 0) t k log log + 3.2275 1 2 t + φμc r t w (13630 hr) log (13630 hr) + 1 (7.65 md) log 6 1 2 (0.039)(0.8 c) (20x10 si ) (0.198 s 6.25 + 3.2275 2 ft) 7.65 md NOTE: m sl IS FORCED FROM THE LOG-LOG PLOT.

Average Reservoir Pressure: Cartesian Plot ws a ex[ bδt] and ws 1 b d dδt [ ws ]

Average Reservoir Pressure: Cartesian Plot ws a ex[ bδt] and ws 1 b d dδt [ ws ]

Conventional PTA Plots: Questions to Consider Q1. What are the "conventional" PTA lots? A1. Listing of lots: Log-log (diagnostic) lot (Δ w and Δ w ') (reservoir boundaries, WBS, k) Semilog lot ( w vs. log[t]) (k,s) Early-time Cartesian lot ( w vs. t) (WBS) Late-time Cartesian lot (Δ w vs. dδ w /dt) (average reservoir ressure) Q2. Strengths of "conventional" PTA lots? A2. Samling: Observation of straight-line or constant behavior. Simlified "flow regime" relations that can be used to estimate reservoir and/or well roerties. Q3. Weaknesses of "conventional" PTA lots? A3. Samling: Can observe "artifact" regimes (e.g., linear flow) that are not real. Observe only art of the overall behavior in time, can be limiting in a diagnostic sense.

Person on my left is: Person on my right is: Name: Section: Petroleum Engineering 324 Well Performance Quiz 18 Log-Log Analysis/Interretation for a Pressure Buildu Test [25 March 2009] Given: These data were extracted from an IDEAL ressure buildu test sequence run on a roducing oil well. The Log-log data lot is attached. Reservoir roerties: φ0.30 r w 0.28 ft c t 3.67x10-5 sia -1 h59 ft Oil roerties: B1.625 RB/STB μ 0.39 c Production arameters: t 1000 hours q1000 STB/D Governing Relations: (IARF Infinite-Acting Radial Flow): qbμ 1 k 70.6 h [ Δ' ] IARF qb Cs... (Log-log lot) 24 mwbs Required: You are to estimate the following: Log-log Analysis: (Use the Δ' data on the log-log lot) Wellbore storage coefficient, C s 0.12 RB/sia Formation ermeability, k 4.85 md Aggie Code of Honor: An Aggie does not lie, cheat, or steal or tolerate those who do. Required Academic Integrity Statement: (Texas A&M University Policy on Academic Integrity) "On my honor, as an Aggie, I have neither given nor received unauthorized aid on this academic work." (your signature)