Supplemental Information for. Geospatial analysis of Oklahoma earthquakes ( ): Quantifying the limits of regional-scale earthquake mitigation

Similar documents
DATA MINING THE KNOWN UNKNOWNS OF OKLAHOMA S CLASS II UIC DATA TO IMPROVE INJECTION INDUCED SEISMICITY STUDIES

Oklahoma Earthquakes: Trends and Underlying Causes. Jeremy Boak, Oklahoma Geological Survey October 21, 2016

Rall Walsh and Mark Zoback

Julie Shemeta, MEQ Geo Inc., WCEE Webinar 1/13/2016 1/14/2016

Monte Carlo simulations for analysis and prediction of nonstationary magnitude-frequency distributions in probabilistic seismic hazard analysis

Thanassoulas 1, C., Klentos 2, V.

Estimating energy balance for hydraulic fracture stimulations: Lessons Learned from Basel

THE ECAT SOFTWARE PACKAGE TO ANALYZE EARTHQUAKE CATALOGUES

Assessment and Mitigation of Ground Motion Hazards from Induced Seismicity. Gail M. Atkinson

Oklahoma Corporation Commission

Potential Injection-Induced Seismicity Associated With Oil & Gas Development

Gutenberg-Richter Law for Internetquakes

Seismic Characteristics and Energy Release of Aftershock Sequences of Two Giant Sumatran Earthquakes of 2004 and 2005

Simulated and Observed Scaling in Earthquakes Kasey Schultz Physics 219B Final Project December 6, 2013

Challenges and Strategies for Monitoring Induced Seismic Activity

How will induced seismicity in Oklahoma respond to decreased saltwater injection rates?

GROUND-WATER LEVEL CHANGES IN U.S. AQUIFERS AS POTENTIAL TRIGGERS FOR EARTHQUAKES JUNE Jean Antonides

Toward interpretation of intermediate microseismic b-values

Seismic source modeling by clustering earthquakes and predicting earthquake magnitudes

Uniform Hazard Spectrum(UHS) for performance based seismic design

A Bayesian Change Point Model To Detect Changes In Event Occurrence Rates, With Application To Induced Seismicity

Evaluating Physical, Chemical, and Biological Impacts from the Savannah Harbor Expansion Project Cooperative Agreement Number W912HZ

A summary of the weather year based on data from the Zumwalt weather station

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

Risk Treatment. Todd Shipman PhD, Alberta Geological Survey/Alberta Energy Regulator November 17 th,2017 Induced Seismicity Workshop, Yellowknife NWT

Recent Earthquakes in Oklahoma. and Potential for Induced Seismicity Austin Holland Oklahoma State Seismologist

Are There Links Between Earthquakes and Oil & Gas Activity in Oklahoma?

Preparation of a Comprehensive Earthquake Catalog for Northeast India and its completeness analysis

C05 Evaluation of Earthquake Hazard Parameters for the Different Regions in the Western Anatolia for Whole Time Periods

Medieval warmth confirmed at the Norse Eastern Settlement in. Greenland. GSA Data Repository G. Everett Lasher 1 and Yarrow Axford 1

The Use of Local Moran s I in Determining the Effectiveness of Location for Gas Extraction

An updated and refined catalog of earthquakes in Taiwan ( ) with homogenized M w magnitudes

Water Information Portal User Guide. Updated July 2014

A comparison of seismicity rates and fluid-injection operations in Oklahoma and California: Implications for crustal stresses

Are earthquakes triggered by hydraulic fracturing more common than previously recognized? Aus$n Holland and Amberlee Darold GSA South- Central Sec$on

TexNet and CISR: An Update on Monitoring and Understanding Seismicity in Texas

Dependence of Possible Characteristic Earthquakes on Spatial Samph'ng: Illustration for the Wasatch Seismic Zone, Utah

Research in Induced Seismicity

IGC. 50 th INDIAN GEOTECHNICAL CONFERENCE PROBABILISTIC SEISMIC HAZARD ANALYSIS FOR WARANGAL CONSIDERING SINGLE SEISMOGENIC ZONING

Spatial Interpolation & Geostatistics

Identifying fault activation during hydraulic stimulation in the Barnett shale: source mechanisms, b

BAD VIBRATIONS (Earthquakes/Tsunamis)

Analysis of Seismicity Coincident with Hydraulic Fracturing of a Well in South Central Oklahoma Amberlee Darold, Research Seismologist Austin

Spatial Cross-correlation Models for Vector Intensity Measures (PGA, Ia, PGV and Sa s) Considering Regional Site Conditions

George Mason University Department of Civil, Environmental and Infrastructure Engineering. Dr. Celso Ferreira Prepared by Lora Baumgartner

Unraveling the Mysteries of Seismicity in Oklahoma. A Story Map

Evaluating Physical, Chemical, and Biological Impacts from the Savannah Harbor Expansion Project Cooperative Agreement Number W912HZ

Estimation of Regional Seismic Hazard in the Korean Peninsula Using Historical Earthquake Data between A.D. 2 and 1995

Discrimination of blasts in mine seismology

Near Real-Time Runoff Estimation Using Spatially Distributed Radar Rainfall Data. Jennifer Hadley 22 April 2003

IRREPRODUCIBLE SCIENCE

A comparison of seismicity rates and fluid injection operations in Oklahoma and California: Implications for crustal stresses

Apparent Slow Oceanic Transform Earthquakes Due to Source Mechanism Bias

Climatography of the United States No

Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis of Nepal considering Uniform Density Model

Comparison Figures from the New 22-Year Daily Eddy Dataset (January April 2015)

4D Integrated Study Using Geology, Geophysics, Reservoir Modeling & Rock Mechanics to Develop Assessment Models for Potential Induced Seismicity Risk

PSHA results for the BSHAP region

To: Ross Martin, Lisa Stapleton From: Brad Lind Subject: Joint Funding Agreement with USGS for 2012 Imagery Date: March 14, 2012.

Seismic Quiescence before the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, M w 7.6 Earthquake

Seismicity and the SWD-C4A well: An ongoing UIC case study in the Denver Basin, Colorado

ISC: SERVING EARTHQUAKE ENGINEER COMMUNITY Gaspà Rebull, O. 1, Gibson G. 2 and Storchak D. A. 1. International Seismological Centre, UK 2

The Architecture of the Georgia Basin Digital Library: Using geoscientific knowledge in sustainable development

Mechanical origin of aftershocks: Supplementary Information

Minimum preshock magnitude in critical regions of accelerating seismic crustal deformation

GIS ADMINISTRATOR / WEB DEVELOPER EVANSVILLE-VANDERBURGH COUNTY AREA PLAN COMMISSION

The State of California s GeoSteam Database & Well Finder On-line Mapping System

DEMAND FORECASTING PROTOCOL

Fracking and Earthquakes What s the Risk? Alastair Muir, President Muir&Associates Consulting

11/8/2018. Spatial Interpolation & Geostatistics. Kriging Step 1

Hazards And Risks Of Earthquakes And Volcanoes By Richard L Sedlock READ ONLINE

Quantitative landslide hazard assessment in an urban area

DEP Office of Oil and Gas Management

1 of 5 12/10/2018, 2:38 PM

Gutenberg-Richter recurrence law to seismicity analysis of Bangladesh

arxiv:physics/ v2 [physics.geo-ph] 18 Aug 2003

Rick Faber CE 513 Building a Base Map Lab #2 6/2/06

On 31 October 2008 and the following day, numerous

OPEN ACCESS GEOLOGY: USING THE INSTITUTIONAL REPOSITORY TO HOST STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PUBLICATIONS

Regulatory Considerations for Evaluating the Potential for Induced Seismicity of a Class I Non-Hazardous Disposal Well

Aspects of risk assessment in power-law distributed natural hazards

Ongoing Oroclinal bending in the Cascadia forearc and its relation to concave-outboard plate margin geometry

Climate Downscaling 201

Evaluating Physical, Chemical, and Biological Impacts from the Savannah Harbor Expansion Project Cooperative Agreement Number W912HZ

Using ArcGIS 10 to Estimate the U.S. Population Affected by Drought

SEISMIC HAZARD CHARACTERIZATION AND RISK EVALUATION USING GUMBEL S METHOD OF EXTREMES (G1 AND G3) AND G-R FORMULA FOR IRAQ

Volcanic Hazards of Mt Shasta

Susitna-Watana Hydroelectric Project (FERC No ) Site-Specific Seismic Hazard Study Study Plan Section 16.6

Engineering Seismology Part B Pdf

Colorado s Underground Injection Control Program: Prevention and Mitigation of Induced Seismicity

RR#8 - Free Response

Seismicity in Pennsylvania and the Pennsylvania State Seismic Network (PASEIS)

Tectonic Seismogenic Index of Geothermal Reservoirs

The xmacis Userʼs Guide. Keith L. Eggleston Northeast Regional Climate Center Cornell University Ithaca, NY

Frequency-dependent Strong Motion Duration Using Total Threshold Intervals of Velocity Response Envelope

Delineating and Assessing Saline Ground Water Resources

Application of Phase Matched Filtering on Surface Waves for Regional Moment Tensor Analysis Andrea Chiang a and G. Eli Baker b

An earthquake is the result of a sudden displacement across a fault that releases stresses that have accumulated in the crust of the earth.

SOFTWARE FOR WEATHER DATABASES MANAGEMENT AND CONSTRUCTION OF REFERENCE YEARS

Transcription:

GSA Data Repository 8 Supplemental Information for Geospatial analysis of Oklahoma earthquakes ( - 6): Quantifying the limits of regional-scale earthquake mitigation measures Ryan M. Pollyea, Neda Mohammadi, John E. Taylor, and Martin C. Chapman Department of Geosciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 96 W. Campus Drive, Blacksburg, Virginia 6 School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, 79 Atlantic Drive NW, Atlanta, Georgia, DATA SOURCES The complete Oklahoma earthquake database was acquired by Internet download from OGS on June 7 (OGS, 7), and annual datasets were compiled between January and December 6 for complete annual earthquakes (M comp ), as well as magnitude.+ (M.+), M.+, and M.+ earthquakes. To assess catalog completeness for the M comp datasets, cumulative frequency-magnitude plots were created for each year of the study (Fig. DR). In doing so, the annual completeness threshold is identified on the basis of the Gutenberg-Richter Law (Gutenberg and Richter, 9) by () fitting a line through the decreasing portion of the distribution, and () determining the lowest earthquake magnitude without substantial deviation from the linear fit. Figure DR shows annual cumulative frequency-magnitude distribution plots, along with each linear fit and lower catalog completeness threshold.

Data for Class II injection well location and SWD volume in Oklahoma were acquired by Internet download for the calendar years - from the OCC website on 8 May 7 (OCC, 7a-e). Each data set was manually inspected to remove incomplete or duplicate records, as well as records without geo-location. The data were then filtered to include () wells within the study area, () wells completed within the combined Arbuckle-Simpson Group, and () wells with non-zero injection volume for a given year. For calendar year 6, well locations and injection volume for Class II wells were acquired by Internet download from the OCC website on 7 June 7 (OCC, 7f). This 6 data set includes weekly reports of daily injection volume for all Arbuckle disposal wells in the OCC Area of Interest, and, as a result, no filtering was required. In the context of geostatistical analysis, qualtitative analysis of the annual datasets indicates that monthly SWD volume is generally consistent for individual wells, and, as a result, the assumption of stationarity is accepted for annual cross semivariogram analysis. For 6, the annual distributions of total Class II SWD injection volume are presented in Figure DR, and the spatial distribution of Class II injection wells is illustrated in Figure DR.

FIGURES Catalog Log N =. -.8M M comp =. N = 97 Catalog Log N = 6.9 -.M M comp =. N =,96 Log N Log N 6 6 Catalog Catalog Log N =.8 -.M Log N = 6. -.M M comp =.7 M comp =. N = 97 N =, Log N 6 Catalog Log N =. -.M M comp =. N =, 6 6 Catalog Log N =.9 -.M M comp =. N =,9 6 Magnitude 6 Magnitude Figure DR. Cumulative frequency-magnitude distribution plots for each annual earthquake catalog compiled for this study. M comp is the lower threshold for catalog completeness determined on the basis of the Gutenberg-Richter Law.

6 o W o W 99 o W 97 o W 9 o W o W o W 99 o W 97 o W 9 o W Figure DR. Spatial distribution of annual earthquake catalogs (green circles) used for geospatial earthquake analysis.

. N = 6. N = 68. 6 8 6. 6 8 6. N = 78. N = 67. 6 8 6. 6 8 6. N = 7. 6 N = 8. 6 8 6. 6 8 6 Figure DR. Annual distribution of class II injection volume for wells within the project study study area (OCC, 7a-f).

6 - o W - o W -99 o W -97 o W -9 o W - o W - o W -99 o W -97 o W -9 o W Class II Injection Well Volume (M m ) <.6.6 -.6.6-6 6 -.79 >.79 Volume (M bbl) <.. -.99 -.99 - > Figure DR. Class II injection well location and SWD volume (OCC, 7a-f) within the study area. Gray shading denotes OCC Expanded Area of Interest for Triggered Earthquakes (OCC, 6) and dashed red box denotes study area.

REFERENCES CITED Gutenberg, B. and Richter, C.F., 9. Frequency of earthquakes in California: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, (), pp.8-88. OCC. 6. Media Advisory - Regional Earthquake Response Plan for Central Oklahoma and Expansion of Area of Interest: http://www.occeweb.com/news/6/-7-6advisory-aoi%c%volume%reduction.pdf, Accessed July 7. OCC. 7a. UIC Injection Volumes : http://www.occeweb.com/og/% A%UIC%volumes.xlsx, Accessed 8 May 7. OCC. 7b. UIC Injection Volumes : http://www.occeweb.com/og/% A%UIC%volumes.xlsx, Accessed 8 May 7. OCC. 7c. UIC Injection Volumes : http://www.occeweb.com/og/% A%UIC%volumes.xlsx, Accessed 8 May 7. OCC. 7d. UIC Injection Volumes : http://www.occeweb.com/og/% A%UIC%volumes.xlsx, Accessed 8 May 7. OCC. 7e. UIC Injection Volumes : http://www.occeweb.com/og/% A%UIC%volumes.xlsx, Accessed 8 May 7. OCC. 7f. Arbuckle AOI Wells - D Reported Volumes: at ftp://ftp.occeweb.com/og_data/dlyd.zip, Accessed 7 June 7 OGS. 7. Oklahoma Geological Survey (OGS) Earthquake Catalogs: http://wichita.ogs.ou.edu/eq/catalog/complete/complete.csv, Accessed June 7.