Final Report. COMET Partner's Project. University of Texas at San Antonio

Similar documents
WHEN IS IT EVER GOING TO RAIN? Table of Average Annual Rainfall and Rainfall For Selected Arizona Cities

Leon Creek Watershed October 17-18, 1998 Rainfall Analysis Examination of USGS Gauge Helotes Creek at Helotes, Texas

Jackson County 2013 Weather Data

Analysis of 3, 6, 12, and 24 Hour Precipitation Frequencies Over the Southern United States

Validating NEXRAD MPE and Stage III precipitation products for uniform rainfall on the Upper Guadalupe River Basin of the Texas Hill Country

The Climate of Texas County

A Review of the 2007 Water Year in Colorado

The Climate of Bryan County

The Climate of Kiowa County

The Climate of Marshall County

CoCoRaHS Monitoring Colorado s s Water Resources through Community Collaborations

The Climate of Murray County

UCAR Award No.: S

February 10, Mr. Jeff Smith, Chairman Imperial Valley Water Authority E County Road 1000 N Easton, IL Dear Chairman Smith:

The Climate of Seminole County

Missouri River Basin Water Management

Changing Hydrology under a Changing Climate for a Coastal Plain Watershed

The Climate of Pontotoc County

Jackson County 2018 Weather Data 67 Years of Weather Data Recorded at the UF/IFAS Marianna North Florida Research and Education Center

The Climate of Grady County

Chiang Rai Province CC Threat overview AAS1109 Mekong ARCC

The Climate of Payne County

Highlights of the 2006 Water Year in Colorado

COUNTRY REPORT. Jakarta. July, th National Directorate of Meteorology and Geophysics of Timor-Leste (DNMG)

The Climate of Haskell County

Monthly Long Range Weather Commentary Issued: February 15, 2015 Steven A. Root, CCM, President/CEO

NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE

SEPTEMBER 2013 REVIEW

Memo. I. Executive Summary. II. ALERT Data Source. III. General System-Wide Reporting Summary. Date: January 26, 2009 To: From: Subject:

Missouri River Basin Water Management Monthly Update

Establishing the Weather Research and Forecast (WRF) Model at NWS Miami and Incorporating Local Data sets into Initial and Boundary Conditions

PRELIMINARY DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES

Applications/Users for Improved S2S Forecasts

YACT (Yet Another Climate Tool)? The SPI Explorer

Drought in Southeast Colorado

Jackson County 2014 Weather Data

GAMINGRE 8/1/ of 7

ZUMWALT WEATHER AND CLIMATE ANNUAL REPORT ( )

Monthly Long Range Weather Commentary Issued: SEPTEMBER 19, 2015 Steven A. Root, CCM, Chief Analytics Officer, Sr. VP, sales

The Huong River the nature, climate, hydro-meteorological issues and the AWCI demonstration project

2003 Water Year Wrap-Up and Look Ahead

Making a Climograph: GLOBE Data Explorations

Champaign-Urbana 2001 Annual Weather Summary

Stream Discharge and the Water Budget

2015 Fall Conditions Report

Scarborough Tide Gauge

Country Presentation-Nepal

Evaluation of MPE Radar Estimation Using a High Density Rain Gauge Network within a Hydro-Estimator Pixel and Small SubWatershed

Location. Datum. Survey. information. Etrometa. Step Gauge. Description. relative to Herne Bay is -2.72m. The site new level.

Champaign-Urbana 1999 Annual Weather Summary

Development of Pakistan s New Area Weighted Rainfall Using Thiessen Polygon Method

Location. Datum. Survey. information. Etrometa. Step Gauge. Description. relative to Herne Bay is -2.72m. The site new level.

Sierra Weather and Climate Update

Climate Change and Water Supply Research. Drought Response Workshop October 8, 2013

Hazard assessment based on radar-based rainfall nowcasts at European scale The HAREN project

Champaign-Urbana 1998 Annual Weather Summary

COUNTRY PRESENTATION ON MR JAYNAL ABEDIN JOINT SECRETARY ( WORKS & DEVELOPMENT ) MINISTRY OF DEFENCE

Champaign-Urbana 2000 Annual Weather Summary

NWS/AFWA/Navy Office: JAN NWS (primary) and other NWS (see report) Name of NWS/AFWA/Navy Researcher Preparing Report: Jeff Craven (Alan Gerard)

Life Cycle of Convective Systems over Western Colombia

Monthly Long Range Weather Commentary Issued: SEPTEMBER 19, 2016 Steven A. Root, CCM, Chief Analytics Officer, Sr. VP,

Technical Memorandum. City of Salem, Stormwater Management Design Standards. Project No:

A Preliminary Severe Winter Storms Climatology for Missouri from

What Does It Take to Get Out of Drought?

Jackson County 2019 Weather Data 68 Years of Weather Data Recorded at the UF/IFAS Marianna North Florida Research and Education Center

Lesson Adaptation Activity: Analyzing and Interpreting Data

Three main areas of work:

Colorado s 2003 Moisture Outlook

PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT OF SURFACE WATER RESOURCES - A STUDY FROM DEDURU OYA BASIN OF SRI LANKA

Did Severe Rains and Flooding in May 2015 Affect Texas Poison Center Call Patterns?

Future Weather in Toronto and the GTA

Areal Reduction Factors for the Colorado Front Range and Analysis of the September 2013 Colorado Storm

Monthly Long Range Weather Commentary Issued: NOVEMBER 16, 2015 Steven A. Root, CCM, Chief Analytics Officer, Sr. VP, sales

Local Ctimatotogical Data Summary White Hall, Illinois

WIND DATA REPORT FOR THE YAKUTAT JULY 2004 APRIL 2005

CAMARGO RANCH, llc. CRAIG BUFORD BufordResources.com

ISO Lead Auditor Lean Six Sigma PMP Business Process Improvement Enterprise Risk Management IT Sales Training

Meteorological Data recorded at Armagh Observatory from 1795 to 2001: Volume I - Daily, Monthly and Annual Rainfall

ACCUMULATED PRECIPITATION IN INCHES

Areal Reduction Factors for the Colorado Front Range and Analysis of the September 2013 Colorado Storm

LAB 3: THE SUN AND CLIMATE NAME: LAB PARTNER(S):

ISO Lead Auditor Lean Six Sigma PMP Business Process Improvement Enterprise Risk Management IT Sales Training

ENGINE SERIAL NUMBERS

Convective-scale NWP for Singapore

CFCAS project: Assessment of Water Resources Risk and Vulnerability to Changing Climatic Conditions. Project Report II.

ISO Lead Auditor Lean Six Sigma PMP Business Process Improvement Enterprise Risk Management IT Sales Training

Monthly Long Range Weather Commentary Issued: May 15, 2014 Steven A. Root, CCM, President/CEO

Drought Characterization. Examination of Extreme Precipitation Events

COMET BGMPartners project Z Final report FINAL REPORT

MISSION DEBRIEFING: Teacher Guide

National Weather Service Greenville-Spartanburg, Forecast Office

Computing & Telecommunications Services Monthly Report January CaTS Help Desk. Wright State University (937)

2 Precipitation and Evaporation

Paul M. Iñiguez* NOAA/National Weather Service, Phoenix, AZ

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Rainfall Observations in the Loxahatchee River Watershed

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Transcription:

Final Report COMET Partner's Project University: Name of University Researcher Preparing Report: University of Texas at San Antonio Dr. Hongjie Xie National Weather Service Office: Name of National Weather Service Researcher Preparing Report: Austin/San Antonio, TX Mr. Jon Zeitler Partners or Cooperative Project: Partners project Project Title: Better understanding of NEXRAD Level II reflectivity using a network of four double-gauge platforms in a single radar cell. UCAR Award No.: S08-68870 Date: September 2009 1

1. Summary of Project and Objectives The purpose of this study was to improve our understanding of NEXRAD (Next Generation Radar) Level II reflectivity for the estimation of precipitation quantity and spatial distribution, by using high accuracy rain gauge measurements within a single radar cell, i.e., a network of four double-gauge platforms in one single radar cell of ~ 1 km 2. A network of four double-gauge platforms within one radar cell was installed in the Government Canyon State Park near San Antonio, Texas, in August 2007 (Figure 1). The research aspects of this project included monthly on-site visits for data collection and equipment maintenance, once every three months visits for recalibration of the rain gages, batch processing the NEXRAD Level II reflectivity data, extracting the reflectivity values for the cell where the gauges are located, batch processing the gauge measurements, generating the areal rainfall for the radar cell based on different methods, and correlation analysis between the radar data and gauge rainfall. The educational aspects of this project were to train the next generation of applied scientists and operational hydrology students through collaborative research, visiting operational facilities, and attending seminars and workshops given by NWS hydrometeorologists and forecasters. 2. Project Accomplishments and Findings During the project lifetime, we collected data for 21 periods; two months (December 2007 and November 2008) had no rainfall recorded. In June and July 2008, some rain events were missed because of hardware recalibration. Table 1 shows the rainfall amount for each of 19 effective collection periods. Despite the gages being in good working condition, this project was conducted during a near-record drought. Based on 2008 data (January to December), the average total rainfall amount was 19.8 inches, well below the 30-year normal of 32.92 inches at the San Antonio International Airport KSAT (~20 miles to the northeast). The 19.8 inches is only ~60 % of the 1971-2000 30-year normal annual mean precipitation. The total rainfall for the hydrologic year 2007-2008 (Sep-Oct) was 28.16 inches, and only 16.02 inches for 2008-2009 to the end of September 2009. This suggests the 2008-2009 Hydrologic Year will be even dryer than the 2007-2008 Hydrologic Year. This demonstrates the severity of the drought that San Antonio and South Texas have been enduring. Figure 2 shows the monthly rainfall recorded during the two years period at Government Canyon compared with both the 30-year monthly mean precipitation of San Antonio and the San Antonio International Airport. Overall, the recorded rainfall during the project cycle is below the 30-year average monthly rainfall, with the exceptions of: August 2007, with 8.84 inches of rainfall (vs. a 30-year mean of 2.57 inches); September 2007 with 4.92 inches (vs. a 30-year mean of 3.00 inches); and both March 2008 (2.63 inches) and March 2009 (3.23 inches) (vs. a 30-year mean of 1.89 inches). We note June 2008 had very little rainfall because the rain gauges were temporarily remove for recalibration. We also find from the Government Canyon data that December 2007 had no rainfall (30-year average for December is 1.96 in.), and November 2008 had no rainfall (30-year average is 2.58 inches). From the two years of data, we found a pattern change, i.e. for the 30-year average, the wettest months are May, June, and October (4.72 inches, 4.30 inches, and 3.86 inches respectively), while at Government Canyon, the wettest months are August (6.36 inches), March (2.88 inches), and May (2.75 inches). Comparing measurements, we found the Government Canyon gages (along the elevated Balcones Escarpment) had higher 2

rainfall than at San Antonio International Airport (~20 miles away at lower elevation), except for August 2008 and February, April, and June 2009, when the San Antonio International Airport gage recorded higher accumulations. VBA and Python computer scripts were developed to batch process and extract reflectivity values from the 5- to 6-minute NEXRAD Level II reflectivity data for periods corresponding to rainfall detected by the rain gages. A reflectivity (Z) to rainfall rate (R) Z-R relationship of Z = 300 R 1.4 was applied to convert the reflectivity to rainfall (inches hr -1 ). Correlation coefficients between the radar rainfall estimate (single cell) and gage rainfall (6- minute intervals) were calculated, along with time shifted interval amounts (1-6 minutes) to represent possible errors between radar and gages due to radar processing procedures and to allow rain detected at altitude to fall to the gages. A shift of three minutes was found to have the best correlation (r = 0.75, Figure 3). Based on the reflectivity and corresponding gauge rainfall, we also derived a Z-R relation 1.21 of Z = 250 R for our region, which is nearly identical to the alternate tropical NEXRAD Z- 1.2 R relation of Z = 250 R. Applying the new Z-R relation to Level II data, we derived new radar rainfall values and compared them with the gauge measurements (Figure 4). A similar correlation coefficient (r = 0.75) is achieved. Further data analyses are still in progress for 30- minute and hourly accumulation comparisons between radar and gages. 3

Figure 1: Location of Government Canyon State Park and the rain gage network. The red rectangles correspond to the NEXRAD grids for the Level II reflectivity product with a resolution of 1 km by 1 0. The green grids cells correspond to the Super Resolution grid (0.25 km by 0.5 0 ), which started on July 10, 2008 for the KEWX radar. The inset shows the location of the KEWX radar, Bexar County boundary, and Government Canyon (red polygon). 4

Total Monthly Rainfall Accumulations from August 2007 to August 2009 10 9 8 Rainfall Accumulation (in. 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Aug-07 Oct-07 Dec-07 Feb-08 Apr-08 Jun-08 Aug-08 Oct-08 Dec-08 Feb-09 Apr-09 Jun-09 Month Government Canyon Aug 07-Aug 09 30-year average monthly rainfall San Antonio Airport (NWS)l Figure 2. Monthly average rainfall collected at Government Canyon from August 2007 to August 2009, 30-year monthly average for the city of San Antonio, Texas (from http://www.rssweather.com/climate/texas/san%20antonio/), and the rainfall at San Antonio International Airport (from http://www.srh.noaa.gov/ewx). Radar ( mm/hr) 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Z = 0.5278 R - 0.0323 r = 0.7464 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Gage ( mm/hr) Figure 3. Correlation between 6-minute gage measurements and radar measurements (using the Z = 300 R 1.4 ) with a three minute time shift. 5

Rain Gages Rate (mm/hr) 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 y = 1.1088x - 2.4898 r = 0.75 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Radar Rate(mm/hr) Figure 4. Correlation between 6-minute gage measurements and radar measurements 1.21 (using the new derived Z = 250 R relation) with a three minute time-shift. Table 1: Rainfall amount (inches) for each collection period. NE, NW, SE, SW, denote the northeast, northwest, southeast, southwest rain gauge platforms respectively. Values for each platform are the averaged rainfall of the two co-located rain gages. Blank means no data were collected due to calibration, maintenance, or other reasons. Rainfall period NE SE NW SW Simple mean Aug 15-Sept 5, 07 11.5 11.3 11.0 11.3 Sep 11-Oct 11, 07 1.6 1.3 1.3 1.4 Oct 20-23, 07 0.6 2.0 0.9 1.9 1.4 Nov 22-25, 07 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.2 Jan 8-Feb 16, 08 0.5 0.6 0.2 0.4 0.4 Mar 3-10, 08 1.4 1.2 1.4 1.3 1.3 Mar 18-Apr 18, 08 1.3 1.2 1.5 1.3 May 5-Jun 6, 08 2.0 1.9 2.0 Jul 7-9, 08 3.1 3.0 2.9 3.0 Jul 23-25, 08 2.8 2.9 3.0 2.9 2.9 Aug 5-25, 08 3.4 3.4 3.6 3.3 3.4 Sep 13-Oct 15, 08 1.8 1.7 0.4 1.3 Dec 15, 08-Jan 6, 09 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 Jan 27-Feb 17, 09 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 Mar 11-31, 09 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.5 2.7 Apr 12-28, 09 1.5 1.6 1.5 1.5 May 16-26, 09 1.9 1.7 2.3 1.6 1.9 Jun 25-Jul 7, 09 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.3 July 18- August 12, 09 1.8 1.9 1.7 1.8 1.8 6

Section 3: Benefits and Lessons Learned: Operational Partner Perspective Benefits to the NWS have been three-fold. First, we became aware of the DSP product through Dr. Xie. We changed our radar product list to produce the DSP for KEWX and KDFX, and to make the DSP the default storm-total precipitation product, which greatly increased the spatial and temporal accuracy for our rainfall estimates, and hence flash flood and river flood warnings. Second, Forecaster Bob Fogarty was trained to archive, store, and process the DSP files in the Weather Event Simulator (WES). This provided a critical backup to Mr. Zeitler for archiving, storing, and developing WES scenarios for training forecasters and conducting other applied research. Third, this collaboration provided the base for future radar/rain gage research, such as studying the benefits of dual-polarization, which will be installed on the KEWX/KDFX radars in 2012, and integrated rainfall estimation, short-term forecasting, and hydrologic modeling for forecasting flash flood inundation. Section 4: Benefits and Lessons Learned: University Partner Perspective Through this Partner s Project, one graduate (Ph.D.) student, Mr. Newfel Mazari, was partially supported. He will present progress on this project at the 34 th AMS Conference on Radar Meteorology. This project will be part of his dissertation and he is still processing and analyzing the data. Mr. Mazari co-organized UTSA s involvement in the San Antonio GIS day (November 21, 2008) and presented his precipitation study and other work in Dr. Xie s group. Undergraduate student Ms. Ann Ji, was involved in the data collection and gage maintenance during summer 2008. Through participation in the project, Ms. Ji learned how to analyze the rainfall data and study the spatial variability of the rainfall within the radar cell. She presented her results in the Earth and Environmental Science Department s annual student colloquium on January 30, 2009, and won second place in the undergraduate category for outstanding research. In summer 2009, we hosted a high school intern, Ms. Liz Perry, to learn rainfall mapping techniques. We trained Ms. Perry and another graduate student to collect and process rainfall gage data, to download NEXRAD data from NCDC using the NEXRAD Java tool, and to make simple comparisons and understand the spatial and temporal patterns of rainfall. Dr. Xie participated in the South Central Texas AMS/NWA Chapter meeting at the NWS office on November 8, 2008. In addition, we also submitted a paper from our last COMET project on related work to the Journal of Hydrology, and it is in revision now. Mr. Zeitler gave a well-regarded lecture in Dr. Xie s Remote Sensing in Hydrology graduate course on January 19, 2009. A similar lecture the previous time the course was offered was also a great success. The students enjoyed the lecture on radar theory, operations and data processing, and especially the coming deployment of dual-polarization capability. Section 5: Publications and Presentations One paper was submitted for peer reviewer. One presentation was given by Ms. Ann Ji in the Department s student colloquium. One conference presentation will be given by Mr. Newfel Mazari to the AMS radar conference. 7

Wang, X., N. Mazari, H. Xie, J. Zeitler, H. Sharif, and W. Hammond. Validation and comparison of NEXRAD DSP and MPE products over the Upper Guadalupe River Basin, Texas. J. of Hydrology (in revision). Ji, Ann, A preliminary study of rainfall measurements based on four double-gauge platforms at the Government Canyon State Park, Texas. Presented at the Department s student colloquium on January 30, 2009, receiving a second place award. (Advisor: Dr. Hongjie Xie). Mazari, N., H. Xie, X. Wang, J.W. Zeitler, and H. Sharif, 2009. Validation of the NEXRAD DSP product with a high accuracy rain gauge network. 34 th Conference on Radar Meteorology, Williamsburg, VA, October 5-9, 2009. Section 6: Summary of University/Operational Partner Interactions and Roles Mr. Jon Zeitler and Mr. Bob Fogarty of WFO Austin/San Antonio made a significant effort to archive the DSP data for the project. The data for two radars (KEWX and KDFX) were archived from 9/11/2006 to present and delivered to UTSA for analysis. Mr. Zeitler also advised about radar operations and data processing, and he gave two lectures to Dr. Xie s graduate courses on remote sensing in hydrology. Dr. Hongjie Xie advised one graduate student on data collection from the rain gauge network and processing, data processing for the NEXRAD Level II reflectivity data, and data analysis. Dr. Xie also advised one undergraduate student who did a project on the gauge data analysis, and a high school intern who learned how to map rainfall. Dr. Xie, Mr. Zeitler, and the students worked on data analysis and interpretation, and manuscript preparation. We held two meetings at the NWS Austin/San Antonio Forecast Office, one lecture was given by Mr. Zeitler to Dr. Xie s remote sensing for hydrology class, and ad hoc discussions about the project occurred at other local meetings. 8