Reflection Seismic Method

Similar documents
Static Corrections for Seismic Reflection Surveys

PART A: Short-answer questions (50%; each worth 2%)

Seismic reflection notes

Elements of 3D Seismology Second Edition

A Petroleum Geologist's Guide to Seismic Reflection

Residual Statics using CSP gathers

ANGLE-DEPENDENT TOMOSTATICS. Abstract

Dipping Layer Refraction Problem Moveout and Coincident Source-Receiver Format

P Wave Reflection and Refraction and SH Wave Refraction Data Processing in the Mooring, TN Area

Oil and Gas Research Institute Seismic Analysis Center Faults Detection Using High-Resolution Seismic Reflection Techniques

Mandatory Assignment 2013 INF-GEO4310

Walkaway Seismic Experiments: Stewart Gulch, Boise, Idaho

Stanford Exploration Project, Report 115, May 22, 2004, pages

Summary. Introduction

Chapter 7: Reflection Seismology Homework Solutions (Jan. 2010)

We A10 12 Common Reflection Angle Migration Revealing the Complex Deformation Structure beneath Forearc Basin in the Nankai Trough

Synthetic Seismogram A Tool to Calibrate PP & PS Seismic Data

Application of Seismic Reflection Surveys to Detect Massive Sulphide Deposits in Sediments-Hosted Environment

Th P7 02 A Method to Suppress Salt-related Converted Wave Using 3D Acoustic Modelling

THE BETTER SUBSURFACE IMAGING USING A QUALITY SEISMIC PROCESSING

The Deconvolution of Multicomponent Trace Vectors

An Alternative Approach to Process the Wide-Angle Reflection Data By Pre-stack Compositing of Gathers for Sub-basalt Imaging

Near-Surface Seismic Reflection Applications

Hybrid Seismic Survey on the Gamanjunni Rockslide Site

FUNDAMENTALS OF SEISMIC EXPLORATION FOR HYDROCARBON

The 2D/3D i-stats Workflow for Image-Based Near-Surface Modeling for Statics Corrections

Rock Physics and Quantitative Wavelet Estimation. for Seismic Interpretation: Tertiary North Sea. R.W.Simm 1, S.Xu 2 and R.E.

Shear wave statics in 3D-3C : An alternate approach

Improved Imaging through Refraction Statics in a Sand Dune Area: A Case Study.

EOS 350 MIDTERM OCT 4, 2013 STUDENT NAME: TEAM #:

Improvement of stacking image by anisotropic velocity analysis using P-wave seismic data

The i-stats: An Image-Based Effective-Medium Modeling of Near-Surface Anomalies Oz Yilmaz*, GeoTomo LLC, Houston, TX

Geophysical Applications Seismic Reflection Processing

An Introduction to Geophysical Exploration

Application of Shot Domain Trim Statics as a Substitute of Interactive Refinement of Receiver Statics in Converted Wave Processing

Processing and interpretation of 2d land seismic reflection survey over bishop wood Yorkshire, England

Seismic tests at Southern Ute Nation coal fire site

INTRODUCTION TO APPLIED GEOPHYSICS

Estimation of Converted Waves Static Corrections Using CMP Cross- Correlation of Surface Waves

Investigating fault shadows in a normally faulted geology

Refraction seismic Method

Th Guided Waves - Inversion and Attenuation

Computation of refraction static corrections using first-break traveltime differences

Tim Carr - West Virginia University

3D Converted Wave Data Processing A case history

Chapter 7. Seismic imaging. 7.1 Assumptions and vocabulary

Downloaded 05/01/17 to Redistribution subject to SEG license or copyright; see Terms of Use at

AVO inversion in V (x, z) media

INTERPRETATION Petroleum Geoengineer MSc

SeisLink Velocity. Key Technologies. Time-to-Depth Conversion

J.A. Haugen* (StatoilHydro ASA), J. Mispel (StatoilHydro ASA) & B. Arntsen (NTNU)

Application of High Resolution Seismic Survey in CBM Exploration A Case study, Sohagpur West Block, Madhya Pradesh

Imaging complex structure with crosswell seismic in Jianghan oil field

Application of Interferometric MASW to a 3D-3C Seismic Survey

Plus-Minus method; Generalized Linear Inverse (GLI, tomographic) method; Delay-time ('time-term') method; L 1

3D beam prestack depth migration with examples from around the world

Analysis of multicomponent walkaway vertical seismic profile data

MODELING OF CROOKED-2D SEISMIC ILLUMINATION - A CASE STUDY FROM ROMANIA

Complex-beam Migration and Land Depth Tianfei Zhu CGGVeritas, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Taseko Prosperity Gold-Copper Project. Appendix 3-6-Q

The seismic response to strong vertical velocity change

Finite difference elastic modeling of the topography and the weathering layer

IMAGING WITH REVERSE VERTICAL SEISMIC PROFILES USING A DOWNHOLE, HYDRAULIC, AXIAL VIBRATOR

Vollständige Inversion seismischer Wellenfelder - Erderkundung im oberflächennahen Bereich

NMO residual reduction on medium anisotropy in field X using Fomel and Stovas method

Reverse Time Shot-Geophone Migration and

The determination of converted-wave statics using P refractions together with SV refractions

SEISMIC INVESTIGATION OF UNDERGROUND COAL FIRES; A FEASIBILITY STUDY AT THE SOUTHERN UTE NATION COAL FIRE SITE, DURANGO, COLORADO.

Applications of finite-difference modelling to coalscale seismic exploration

ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION

Ultra high-resolution seismic and GPR imaging of permafrost. Devon Island, Nunavut

Relationship between head wave amplitudes and seismic refraction velocities to detect lateral variation in the refractor

Synthetic seismic modelling and imaging of an impact structure

Improved image aids interpretation: A case history

Refraction analysis of the Blackfoot 2D-3C data

The Estimation of PS Wave Statics By Using SCDCC + Stack Power Method

Seismic Reflection Profiling: An Effective Exploration Tool in the Athabasca Basin? An Interim Assessment

TOM 2.6. SEG/Houston 2005 Annual Meeting 2581

A 3D seismic survey for mapping shallow targets

P S-wave polarity reversal in angle domain common-image gathers

Noise suppression and multiple attenuation using full-azimuth angle domain imaging: case studies

Phase and group velocity measurements from physically modeled transmission gathers

A Study of Uphole to Determine the Shooting Medium for Seismic Reflection Survey at Himalayan Foot Hill Area

Figures S1 S4 show the measurements taken from the synthetic vespagrams where a)

Feasibility and design study of a multicomponent seismic survey: Upper Assam Basin

SEISMIC SURVEYS FOR IMAGING THE REGOLITH

Near-surface velocity characterization via RVSP and multicomponent seismic refraction experiments

P137 Our Experiences of 3D Synthetic Seismic Modeling with Tip-wave Superposition Method and Effective Coefficients

Moveout, velocity, and stacking

Research Project Report

MYRES Seismic Constraints on Boundary Layers. Christine Thomas

Seismic Reflection Results: Stewart Gulch Region, Boise, Idaho

( ) ( ), 1, 1. Downloaded 10/14/14 to Redistribution subject to SEG license or copyright; see Terms of Use at

A time migration before stack

Reservoir Characterization using AVO and Seismic Inversion Techniques

Tomography for Static Corrections and Prestack Depth Imaging

Multicomponent seismic survey at Spring Coulee: a data repeatability study

Depth Imaging for Unconventional Reservoir Characterization: Canadian Plains Case Study

Pre Stack Imaging To Delineate A New Hydrocarbon Play A Case History

FloatSeis Technologies for Ultra-Deep Imaging Seismic Surveys

Transcription:

Reflection Seismic Method Data and Image sort orders; Seismic Impedance; -D field acquisition geometries; CMP binning and fold; Resolution, Stacking charts; Normal Moveout and correction for it; Stacking; Zero-Offset reflection section; Migration. Reading: Reynolds, Chapter 6 Shearer, 7.1-7.5 Telford et al., Sections 4.3, 4.7, 4.8, 4.10

Zero-Offset Section (The goal of reflection imaging) The ideal of reflection imaging is sources and receivers collocated on a flat horizontal surface ( datum ). In reality, we have to record at sourcereceiver offsets, and over complex topography. Two types of corrections are applied to compensate these factors: Statics compensate these NMO corrects for these Statics place sources and receivers onto the datum; Normal Moveout Corrections transform the records into as if they were recorded at collocated sources and receivers. As a result of these corrections (plus stacking to suppress noise), we obtain a zero-offset section.

Reflection coefficient Quantity imaged in reflection sections At near-normal incidence: P-to-S-wave conversions are negligible; P-wave reflection and transmission amplitudes are determined by the contrast in acoustic impedance Z=ρV (see next page). P- and S-wave reflection amplitudes usually vary with incidence angles. AP R PP = AP reflected incident Z1 = ρ1vp1 Z = ρvp Acoustic impedance

Acoustic Impedance Reflection-coefficient relations follow from: 1) continuity of displacement, and ) conservation of energy upon reflection/transmission Acoustic impedance measures the energy flux within the wave: E flux =V E density =V A = V A Z Kinetic energy P-wave Reflection Coefficient RPP = AP reflected AP incident = Z Z 1 Z Z 1 Note: if Z < Z1, R<0. This means polarity reversal upon reflection P-wave Transmission Coefficient Z1 T PP=1 R PP = Z 1+Z This follows from the continuity of displacement across the boundary

Acoustic Impedance Typical values From Salisbury, 1996

Spatial resolution Two points are considered unresolvable when their reflection travel times are separated by less than half the dominant period of the signal: δt < T/. Therefore, vertical resolution: z=pp 1= S=R 4. H horizontal resolution: 1 x=pp = H H H. 4 This is called Fresnel Zone radius P P1 P Note that horizontal resolution decreases with depth.

Vertical resolution Faults with different amounts of vertical throws, compared to the dominant wavelength:

Horizontal resolution Faults with different amounts of vertical throws, compared to the dominant wavelength:

Shot (field) and CommonMidpoint (image) sort orders Common-Midpoint survey: Helps in reduction of random noise and multiples via redundant coverage of the subsurface; Ground roll is attenuated through the use of geophone arrays. Geophone arrays: CMPs CM P CMP spacing = ½ receiver spacing CMP Fold = 4

Field geometry survey and observer's logs, chaining notes Survey file Produced by surveyors (usually comes out of GPS unit); Observer's Notes A record of shooting and recording sequence Lists shot positions, record ( field file ) numbers (FFIDs), spread positions ( first live station ); Records weather, interruptions, usual and unusual noise, state of recording system.

Noise (Wave) Test Conducted prior to the acquisition in order to evaluate the appropriate survey design Offset range; Noise (ground roll, airwave) characteristics; Offset range for useful reflections. Reflections Outer traces Inner traces

Stacking chart Visualization of source-receiver geometry Fixed spread Split-spread Marine (off-end)

CMP Fold Fold is the Number of records per CMP Should be optimal (typically, 10-40); Should be uniform (this is particularly an issue with 3D). Fold = Number of channels (Num. of Shot point advances by Receiver spacing) CMP bins Fold counts = 3

Crooked-line binning Real seismic lines are often crooked CMP bins are then defined for an averaged, smooth line of midpoints

Statics Statics are time shifts associated with source ( ts) and receiver ( tr) positions When subtracted ('applied') from the travel-times, place the source and receiver on a common datum. (Field statics) = (Elevation Correction) + (Weathering Correction); Elevation correction 'moves' the source and geophone to a common datum surface; Weathering correction removes the effect of slow (~600 m/s) unconsolidated layer. Obtained from first arrivals, using the plus-minus, GRM, or similar methods. Where field statics are not accurate enough, residual statics are also applied. G Weathered layer Datum surface DS Elevation statics: ES V W S tg ts V>>VW Ed t S= E S DS E d, V t G = t S t uphole

Effects of statics in shot gathers No statics Conventional statics GLI (tomography) statics

Effects of statics in stacked image Conventional statics GLI statics

Reflection travel-times (Single layer) Post-critical region t Pre-critical region t0 e Dir Head ct x xcritical S h d cte e l f Re i V ic 4h x t x = = V h x x = t 0 V V V t(x) is called (hyperbolic) Normal reflection Moveout (NMO) Approximation for x << h (parabolic): 1 x t x t 0 t 0 V Note that deeper reflections in faster layers have smaller moveouts

Reflection travel-times (Multiple layers) For multiple layers, t(x) is no longer hyperbolic: h1, V1, ρ1 h, V, ρ Layer velocities are called interval velocities h3, V3, ρ3 h4, V4, ρ4 The ray is characterized by ray parameter, p [s/km] h5, V5, ρ5 V6, ρ6 For practical applications (near-vertical incidence, pvi<<1), t(x) still can be approximated as: n x n p = i=1 hence: n hi p V i n 1 p h V [1 pv ] p hi V i, i i i i=1 1 pv i i=1 p= xn p n, hi V i i =1 n n n hi 1 1 t n p = [ 1 pv i ]=t 0 p h i V i i=1 i=1 V i 1 pv i i=1 V i hi 1 x t n x t 0 t0 V RMS where VRMS is the RMS (rootmean-square) velocity: V RMS = n hi V i i=1 t0 = n t i V i i=1 n ti i=1.

Dipping reflector For a dipping reflector, the image is smeared up-dip and the stacking velocity is over-estimated.

Measurement of velocities (Velocity analysis) Reflection (stacking) velocity analysis is usually performed in CMP gathers because they pertain to specific locations within the subsurface. Travel-time approach - T-X method: t(x) is a linear function. Slope of the graph in t(x) diagram is (1/VStacking). Waveform approach (velocity spectrum and common velocity stacks (CVS)) stack the records along trial reflection hyperbolas; plot the resulting amplitude in a (time, Vtrial) diagram; pick amplitude peaks - this results in a V(time) profile.

Velocity Spectra CMP gathers are stacked along trial velocities and presented in time-velocity diagrams.

Common-Velocity Stacks (Velocity analysis) CMP gathers are NMO-corrected (hyperbolas flattened) using a range of trial velocities and stacked. Velocities are picked at the amplitude peaks and best resolution in the stacks.

Normal Moveout (NMO) correction NMO correction transforms a reflection record at offset x into a normal-incidence (x = 0) record: t x t 0=t x t NMO x 1 x t NMO = t t 0 V t V Stacking velocity x 0 t0 offset x1 NMO corrections t(x) t Stacking velocity is determined from the data, as a measure of the reflection hyperbola best aligned of with the reflection.

NMO stretch NMO correction affects the shallower and slower reflections stronger This is called NMO stretch There is a considerable effort in creating nonstretching NMO algorithms Raw NMO corrected Non-stretching NMO corrected Exercise: derive the sensitivities of NMO correction to δt, δv, and δx: t NMO / t, t NMO / V, t NMO / x.

Migration A simplified variant of 'inversion' Transforms the 'time section' into true 'depth image'. Establishes true positions and dips of reflectors. Collapses diffractions. t r x = t 0 Migration collapses diffraction curves (surfaces in 3-D) x V t0 t0 x t d x = V

Modeling Depth-velocity model Salt Reflections from the top of salt layer Reflections from the base of salt layer Ray tracing to determine stacking velocities

Synthetic seismograms Proceed Synthetics with principal multiples Synthetics is spliced into CMP section for comparison Acoustic log Synthetics (Convolved with wavelet) Field data after NMO