INFLUENCE OF DECK PLATING STRENGTH ON SHIP HULL ULTIMATE BENDING MOMENT

Similar documents
Longitudinal strength standard

Safe Struck Ship (3S):Software Package for Structural analysis of collision between ships

Corrigenda 1 to 01 January 2017 version

Urgent Rule Change Notice 1 to 01 JAN 2015 version

RULES FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AND CLASSIFICATION OF SHIPS IDENTIFIED BY THEIR MISSIONS DREDGERS AND MUD BARGES CHAPTERS CHAPTERS SCOPE

Upper and Lower Connections of Side Frame of Single Side Bulk Carrier

FATIGUE STRENGTH ANALYSIS OF STEEL HULL STRUCTURE

Corrigenda 2 Rule Editorials

THE LEVEL OF CONFIDENCE FOR A SHIP HULL GIRDER

RULES FOR THE SURVEY AND CONSTRUCTION OF STEEL SHIPS

Longitudinal Strength Standard for Container Ships

RULES PUBLICATION NO. 18/P ZONE STRENGTH ANALYSIS OF BULK CARRIER HULL STRUCTURE

RULES FOR THE SURVEY AND CONSTRUCTION OF STEEL SHIPS

Additional Rule for Longitudinal Strength Assessment of Container Ships JULY 2016

QUANTIFYING THE EFFECT OF INSPECTIONS IN SHIPS CONSIDERING THE SPATIAL VARIABILITY OF CORROSION

Structural reliability assessment of accidentally damaged oil tanker

Longitudinal Strength Members & Small Hatch Securing System. IMO - MSC 105(73) Longitudinal Strength

RULES FOR CLASSIFICATION. Ships. Part 3 Hull Chapter 6 Hull local scantling. Edition January 2017 DNV GL AS

RULES FOR CLASSIFICATION. Ships. Part 3 Hull Chapter 4 Loads. Edition January 2017 DNV GL AS

RULES FOR CLASSIFICATION Ships. Part 3 Hull Chapter 6 Hull local scantling. Edition October 2015 DNV GL AS

Structural Rules for Container Ships

Evaluation of Scantlings of Corrugated Transverse Watertight Bulkheads in Non-CSR Bulk Carriers Considering Hold Flooding

RULES FOR CLASSIFICATION. Ships. Part 3 Hull Chapter 10 Special requirements. Edition January 2017 DNV GL AS

RULES FOR CLASSIFICATION Inland navigation vessels. Part 3 Structures, equipment Chapter 2 Design load principles. Edition December 2015 DNV GL AS

Maerli, Andre (1998) Structural reliability analysis of FPSOs towards a rational design procedure.

S19 S19. (1997) (Rev ) (Rev. 2 Feb. 1998) (Rev.3 Jun. 1998) (Rev.4 Sept. 2000) (Rev.5 July 2004) S Application and definitions

Technical Background for Rule Change Notice 1 to 01 JAN 2014 version

Residual. r 2. damage extents. considering probabilistic. collision- and. developed to

Optimisation of the container ship hull structure

RULES PUBLICATION NO. 17/P ZONE STRENGTH ANALYSIS OF HULL STRUCTURE OF ROLL ON/ROLL OFF SHIP

The 10 th international Energy Conference (IEC 2014)

Reliability Analysis and Updating of Inspected Ship Structures subject to Spatially Variable Corrosion

IACS COMMON STRUCTURAL RULES FOR BULK CARRIERS

CAPACITY ESTIMATES AND GENERAL ARRANGEMENT

STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF OFFSHORE SHIPS

Samantha Ramirez, MSE

Monte Carlo prediction o f extreme values of the combined load effects and simplified probabilistic design of ocean going ships

C C S 通函 Circular China Classification Society (2012 )Circ. 25 /Total No /2/2012 (total pages: 1+23 )

Department of Aerospace and Ocean Engineering Graduate Study Specialization in Ocean Engineering. Written Preliminary Examination Information

INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CLASSIFICATION SOCIETIES. Requirements concerning STRENGTH OF SHIPS

RULES FOR THE CLASSIFICATION AND CONSTRUCTION OF NAVAL SHIPS

HULL STRUCTURAL DESIGN SHIPS WITH LENGTH 100 METRES AND ABOVE

STRENGTH OF MATERIALS-I. Unit-1. Simple stresses and strains

HULL STRUCTURAL DESIGN SHIPS WITH LENGTH 100 METRES AND ABOVE

Influence of residual stresses in the structural behavior of. tubular columns and arches. Nuno Rocha Cima Gomes

HULL STRUCTURAL DESIGN, SHIPS WITH LENGTH 100 METRES AND ABOVE

Chapter Objectives. Copyright 2011 Pearson Education South Asia Pte Ltd

Design Theories of Ship and Offshore Plant

Conversion of an Oil Tanker into FPSO. Strength Analysis using ABS Rules

PURE BENDING. If a simply supported beam carries two point loads of 10 kn as shown in the following figure, pure bending occurs at segment BC.

IACS Unified Requirements for Polar Ships

Hull Structural Design, Ships with Length 100 metres and above

PROBABILISTIC MODEL OF ULTIMATE STRENGTH REDUCTION OF GROUNDED SHIP

[8] Bending and Shear Loading of Beams

Hull structural design - Ships with length 100 metres and above

Name :. Roll No. :... Invigilator s Signature :.. CS/B.TECH (CE-NEW)/SEM-3/CE-301/ SOLID MECHANICS

Aalto University School of Engineering

Evaluating Corrosion Wastage and Structural Safety of Aging Ships

ShipRight Design and Construction

Advanced Structural Analysis EGF Section Properties and Bending

Aalto University School of Engineering

Bending Stress. Sign convention. Centroid of an area

Corrigenda 3 Rule Editorials

ASSESSMENT OF STRESS CONCENTRATIONS IN LARGE CONTAINER SHIPS USING BEAM HYDROELASTIC MODEL

Bridge deck modelling and design process for bridges

HULL STRUCTURAL DESIGN SHIPS WITH LENGTH LESS THAN 100 METRES

HULL STRUCTURAL DESIGN SHIPS WITH LENGTH LESS THAN 100 METRES

QUESTION BANK SEMESTER: III SUBJECT NAME: MECHANICS OF SOLIDS

SAFEHULL-DYNAMIC LOADING APPROACH FOR VESSELS

Optimization of Thin-Walled Beams Subjected to Bending in Respect of Local Stability and Strenght

Stress Analysis Lecture 4 ME 276 Spring Dr./ Ahmed Mohamed Nagib Elmekawy

SLAMMING LOADS AND STRENGTH ASSESSMENT FOR VESSELS

A SIMPLIFIED APPROACH TO ESTIMATE THE ULTIMATE LONGITUDINAL STRENGTH OF SHIP HULL

Beam Bending Stresses and Shear Stress

Hull Structural Design, Ships with Length Less than 100 metres

THE ANNALS OF DUNĂREA DE JOS UNIVERSITY OF GALAŢI FASCICLE V, TECHNOLOGIES IN MACHINE BUILDING, ISSN , 2012

PLATE GIRDERS II. Load. Web plate Welds A Longitudinal elevation. Fig. 1 A typical Plate Girder

Torsion and Shear Stresses in Ships

Strength of Materials Prof. Dr. Suraj Prakash Harsha Mechanical and Industrial Engineering Department Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee

L3c DESIGN PROBLEM DECOMPOSITION

RULES FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AND CLASSIFICATION OF SHIPS IDENTIFIED BY THEIR MISSION CHAPTERS A. SCOPE B. DOCUMENTS, REGULATIONS AND STANDARDS

CHAPTER 4. Stresses in Beams

Final Exam Ship Structures Page 1 MEMORIAL UNIVERSITY OF NEWFOUNDLAND. Engineering Ship Structures

Reliability based design procedure for better survivability of intact and damaged ships

Mechanics of Solids notes

Ship structure dynamic analysis - effects of made assumptions on computation results

CONSIDERATIONS ON DIMENSIONING OF GARAGE DECKS

QUESTION BANK DEPARTMENT: CIVIL SEMESTER: III SUBJECT CODE: CE2201 SUBJECT NAME: MECHANICS OF SOLIDS UNIT 1- STRESS AND STRAIN PART A

UNCERTAINTY IN HULL GIRDER FATIGUE ASSESSMENT OF CONTAINERSHIP

Rules for Classification and Construction Analysis Techniques

Ultimate uniaxial compressive strength of stiffened panel with opening under lateral pressure

KINGS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK. Subject code/name: ME2254/STRENGTH OF MATERIALS Year/Sem:II / IV

Structural design of helicopter landing platform for super-yacht

MEMBRANE TANK LNG VESSELS

THE ANALYSIS OF LOCAL STRESS DISTRIBUTION DUE TO THERMAL LOADS IN THE STRENGTHEN STRUCTURE OF A PRODUCT CHEMICAL TANKER SHIP

PLEASURE VESSEL VIBRATION AND NOISE FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS

Ice Class Regulations and the Application Thereof

Optimal Design of FPSO Vessels

MECE 3321: Mechanics of Solids Chapter 6

Investigation of Ship Hull Girder Strength with Grounding Damage

Transcription:

TECHNICAL REPORT NO. 73 INFLUENCE OF DECK PLATING STRENGTH ON SHIP HULL ULTIMATE BENDING MOMENT Authors: Dr Marian Bogdaniuk Dr Monika Warmowska Gdańsk, 2016

Technical Report No. 73 3 CONTENTS PURPOSE OF THE STUDY... 5 1. 80000 DWT BULK CARRIER... 6 1.1 Ship main data... 6 1.2 Still water and wave bending moments... 6 1.3 Section modulus value of the hull in midship hold region... 6 1.4 Ultimate bending moment... 7 2. 30000 DWT OIL TANKER... 9 2.1 Ship main data... 9 2.2 Still water and wave bending moments... 9 2.3 Section modulus value of the hull in midship hold region... 9 2.4 Ultimate bending moment for tanker hull... 10 3. BULK CARRIER NO. 2... 11 3.1 Ship main data... 11 3.2 Still water and wave bending moments in intact condition... 11 3.3 Section modulus value of the hull in midship hold region...11 3.4 Ultimate bending moment for bulkcarriers... 12

Technical Report No. 73 5 PURPOSE OF THE STUDY The analysis was performed to find f coefficient values dependent on deck plating thickness. The sagging and hogging ultimate bending moments were computed for various ship types. The computations were performed applying a PRS elaborated computer program Napreżenia.exe The application calculates ultimate bending moments for a steel hull. Computations account for a 3D ship hull segment of fixed length l. for sagging and hogging of the segment in the user defined range [ p, k ] of the curvature. The program: reads ship structure data describing ship hull transverse cross section, creates or modifies the elements of ship s hull transverse cross-section for which σ ε curves are used, calculates the maximum bending moment M which can be equilibrated by normal stresses in the cross-section, computes maximum hull bending moment M, gives the curvature corresponding to maximum bending moment M, gives curvature value in the specified range [ p, k ] when the maximum is reached, gives coordinate z 0, of the neutral axis in succeeding steps of computations provided the t the longitudinal force in the cross-section is close to zero, determines coordinate z 0, of the neutral axis for longitudinal force close to zero, and generates diagrams of computed values and an animation showing changes of the computed values as a function of. The report presents computation results of f in the equation: sm sw f wm wv M Ult / R where: M sw still water bending moment (hogging or sagging), M wv ave bending moment (hogging or sagging), M ult ultimate bending moment. Partial safety factors R and w are assumed according to the requirements of IACS Common Structural Rules for Bulk Carriers and Oil Tankers (January 2015) given in Chapter 5, Section 2. These values are given in Table 1. Table 1. Partial safety factors Bulk carrier Oil Tanker S W DB M R = DB * M hogging 1.0 1.2 1.25 1.1 1.375 sagging 1.0 1.2 1.0 1.1 1.1 hogging 1.0 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.21 sagging 1.0 1.2 1.0 1.1 1.1 Symbols in Table 1 have the meaning: γ S partial safety factor for still water bending moment; γ W partial safety factor for the vertical wave bending moment; γ R partial safety factor for the vertical hull girder ultimate bending moment; γ M partial safety factor for the vertical hull girder ultimate bending capacity covering material, geometric and strength prediction uncertainties; γ DB partial safety factor for the vertical hull girder ultimate bending capacity covering the effect of double bottom bending.

6 Technical Report No. 73 1. 80000 DWT BULK CARRIER 1.1 SHIP MAIN DATA The data are given in Table 2. Hull length Table 2. Main data of bulkcarrier I L = 218.83 m Length between perpendiculars Moulded breadth of ship Moulded depth of ship Scantling draught L PP = 222.00 m B = 32.26 m D = 20.25 m T SC = 14.62 m Block coefficient at draught Tsc C B = 0.879 1.2 STILL WATER AND WAVE BENDING MOMENTS Still water bending moment values M sw-s, M sw-h, M wv-s, M wv-h, for intact condition were computed according to CSR requirements (Chapter 4, Section 4). Their values are given in Table 3. Table 3. Still water bending moments values in intact condition Cargo hold Fr. x/l [ ] M sw-s knm] M sw-h M wv-s M wv-h CH4 142 0.54 1750000 2170000 2699366 2595624 1.3 SECTION MODULUS VALUE OF THE HULL IN MIDSIP HOLD REGION The cross-section in hold No. 4 is schematically shown in the figure below. Computed transverse cross section area As, inertia bending moment Izz = I y-n50 and neutral axis coordinate zg, for cargo hold No. 4, read: As = 33062.22 cm 2, Izz = 230.5566 m 4, zg = 8.5551 m. Fig. 1. Ship hull cross-section at cargo hold No. 4

Technical Report No. 73 7 1.4 ULTIMATE BENDING MOMENT Computations were performed for some strength deck plating values. The deck thickness in the computations was decreased by 0.5t c to 22 mm (the offered deck thickness was 24 mm). Yield stress R eh = 355 MPa. Values of f computed for the bending moments values given in Table 3 are given in Table 4 and in diagrams shown in Fig.1. Deck thickness [mm] t-0.5tc Table 4. Ultimate bending moment and f values M ULT_sagging M ULT_hogging f _ sagging f hogging 12 5 872 581 7 213 206 1.11 1.22 13 6 003 645 7 303 089 1.14 1.24 14 6 136 796 7 390 570 1.18 1.26 15 6 277 743 7 476 235 1.22 1.29 16 6 414 127 7 560 228 1.26 1.31 17 6 552 237 7 642 875 1.30 1.33 18 6 695 703 7 723 982 1.34 1.35 22 7 248 463 8 035 638 1.49 1.44 23 7 383 046 8 110 156 1.53 1.46 24 7 512 488 8 183 871 1.57 1.47 25 7 645 629 8 256 026 1.61 1.49 26 7 773 388 8 326 450 1.64 1.51 27 7 895 639 8 394 570 1.68 1.53 32 8 478 852 8 670 547 1.84 1.60 6E+6 5E+6 4E+6 3E+6 2E+6 1E+6 Mult fb 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.0 sagging hogging 0.9 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 t_deck [mm] t_deck [mm] Fig. 2. Ultimate bending moment and f values as function of deck thickness

8 Technical Report No. 73 Hull girder ultimate strength Appraisal of the ship ultimate strength according to the requirements of the present CSR and the proposal to increase the wave bending moment design value by 5%, is given in Table 5 where: M M s sw f M Table 5. Requirements for hull girder ultimate strength Operation Seagoing Seagoing Condition Hogging Sagging γ R 1.375 1.1 M sw 2170000 1750000 M wv 2595624 2699366 M CSRH 5284749 5019239 1.05 CSRH 5440486 5181201 1.05 CSRH/CSRH [%] 102.9% 103.2% M U 8035638 7248463 M U /γ R /M CSRH [%] 110.6% 131.3% 1.05 CSRH [%] 107.4% 127.2% w wv Hull girder strength Appraisal of the ship hull girder strength according to the requirements of present CSR and the proposal to increase the wave bending moment design value by 5%, is given in Table 6. Table 6. Requirements to Section Modulus Operation Seagoing Seagoing Condition Hogging Hogging M sw 2170000 2170000 M wv Z required CSRH 2595624 2595624 1.05 CSRH 2725405 2725405 1.05 CSRH/CSRH [%] 105.0% 105.0% CSRH [m 3 ] 18.06 18.06 1.05 CSRH [m 3 ] 18.61 18.61 1.05 CSRH/CSRH [%] 103.0% 103.0% Z actual [m 3 ] 19.54 26.4 Z actual /Z required CSRH [%] 108% 146% 1.05 CSRH [%] 105% 142%

Technical Report No. 73 9 2. 30000 DWT OIL TANKER 2.1 SHIP MAIN DATA The data are given in Table 7. Table 7. Ship main data Hull length L = 168.18 m Length between perpendiculars L PP = 168.18 m Moulded breadth of ship B = 25.30 m Moulded depth of ship D = 18.00 m Scantling draught T SC = 11.35 m Block coefficient at draught Tsc C B = 0.820 2.2 STILL WATER AND WAVE BENDING MOMENTS Still water bending moment and wave bending moments values M sw-s, M sw-h, M wv-s, M wv-h, for intact conditions were computed according to CSR requirements (Chapter 4, Section 4). Their values are given in Table 8. Cargo hold Table 8. Bending moment values x/l [ ] M sw-s M sw-h M wv-s M wv-h CH4 0.57 1648521 1725783 1107277 1030015 2.3 SECTION MODULUS VALUE OF THE HULL IN MIDSHIP HOLD REGION CARGO HOLD NO. 4 The cross-section in the midship is schematically shown in the figure below. Computed transverse cross section area As, inertia bending moment Izz = I y-n50 and neutral axis coordinate zg, for cargo hold No. 4, read: As = 25249.4 cm 2, Izz = 125.93 m 4, zg = 7.287 m. Fig. 3. Ship hull cross-section at cargo hold No. 4

10 Technical Report No. 73 2.4 ULTIMATE BENDING MOMENT FOR TANKER HULL The computations were performed for some strength deck plating values. The deck thickness in the computations was decreased by 0.5t c to 12 mm (the offered deck thickness was 14 mm). Yield stress R eh = 315 MPa. Values of f computed for the bending moments given in Table 8 are given in Table 9 and in diagrams shown in Fig. 4. Table 9. Ultimate bending moment and f values Thickness [mm] t 0.5tc M ULT_sagging M ULT_hogging f _ sagging f hogging 12.00 2 950 616 4 830 730 0.78 1.83 13.00 3 107 498 4 912 228 0.89 1.89 14.00 3 267 560 4 991 626 0.99 1.94 14.50 3 348 853 5 031 395 1.05 1.97 15.00 3 429 969 5 071 215 1.11 1.99 16.00 3 604 578 5 151 344 1.23 2.05 16.50 3 677 144 5 183 202 1.28 2.07 17.00 3 769 888 5 226 772 1.34 2.10 18.00 3 924 330 5 294 039 1.44 2.14 19.00 4 088 229 5 364 420 1.56 2.19 22.00 4 572 769 5 552 207 1.89 2.32 6E+6 5E+6 Mult fb 1.2 sagging hogging 4E+6 1.1 3E+6 2E+6 1.0 1E+6 0.9 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 t_deck [mm] t_deck [mm] Fig. 4. Ultimate bending moment and f values as function of deck thickness

Technical Report No. 73 11 3. BULK CARRIER No. 2 3.1 SHIP MAIN DATA The data are given in Table 10. Hull length Table 10. Ship main data L = 281.95 m Length between perpendiculars Moulded breadth of ship Moulded depth of ship Scantling draught L PP = 282 m B = 44.2 m D = 24.99 m T SC = 18.442 m Block coefficient at draught Tsc C B = 0.8095 3.2 STILL WATER AND WAVE BENDING MOMENTS IN INTACT CONDITION Still water bending moments M sw-s, M sw-h, M wv-s, M wv-h, for intact conditions were computed according to CSR requirements (Chapter 4, Section 4). Their values are given in Table 11. Still water and wave bending moments M sw-s, M sw-h, M wv-s, M wv-h for ship in intact condition: Table 11. Still water and waving bending moments in in tact condition Cargo hold x/l [-] M sw-s M sw-h M wv-s M wv-h CH4 0.57 3 658 159 4 007 365 6 238 504 5 768 146 3.3 SECTION MODULUS VALUE OF THE HULL IN MIDSIP HOLD REGION The cross-section in hold No. 4 is schematically shown in Fig. 5 below. Computed transverse cross section area As, inertia bending moment Izz = I y-n50 and neutral axis coordinate zg, for cargo hold No. 4, read: As = 2* 30033.95 cm 2, Izz = 2*299.6143 cm 4, zg = 10.4847 m. Fig. 5. Ship hull cross-section at cargo hold No. 4

12 Technical Report No. 73 3.4 ULTIMATE BENDING MOMENT FOR BULKCARRIERS The computations were performed for some strength deck plating values. The deck thickness was decreased by 0.5t c to 27 mm (the offered deck thickness was 29 mm). Yield stress R eh = 315 MPa. Values of f computed for the bending moments given in Table 11 are given in Table 12 and in diagrams shown in Fig. 6. Table 12. Ultimate bending moment and f values Thickness [mm] t 0.5tc M ULT_sagging M ULT_hogging f _ sagging f hogging 27 14177852 13570109 1.233 0.847 28 14355953 13681130 1.255 0.859 40 16512221 14961760 1.517 0.993 44 15632028 15384590 1.410 1.038 46 17627483 15573682 1.652 1.057 sagging 1.8E+7 1.6E+7 1.4E+7 Mult fb 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.8 hogging 24 28 32 36 40 44 48 24 28 32 36 40 44 48 t_deck [mm] t_deck [mm] Fig. 6. Ultimate bending moment and f values as function of deck thickness Bibliography 1. Common Structural Rules for Bulk Carriers and Oil Tankers, July 2015.