New Land Cover & Land Use Data for the Chesapeake Bay Watershed

Similar documents
Link to USGS Phase 6 Land Use Viewer website:

Phase 6 Land Use Database version 2

The Road to Data in Baltimore

Phase 6 Land Use Database version 1

Chesapeake Bay Program s New Land Cover Map (and some other neat stuff)

CHESAPEAKE BAY PROGRAM LAND USE WORKGROUP

MARYLAND S LAND USE/LAND COVER MAP AND ASSOCIATED ANALYSIS

Chesapeake Bay Remote Sensing Pilot Executive Briefing

Land Use Methods & Metrics Development Outcome

NR402 GIS Applications in Natural Resources

CHESAPEAKE BAY PROGRAM LAND USE WORKGROUP

Presented by: Bryan Bloch GIS Specialist DNREC Division of Watershed Stewardship

2011 Land Use/Land Cover Delineation. Meghan Jenkins, GIS Analyst, GISP Jennifer Kinzer, GIS Coordinator, GISP

Gina Hunt Chesapeake Bay Program Fish Habitat Coordinator

Geospatial Assessment in Support of Urban & Community Forestry Programs

Urban Tree Canopy Assessment Purcellville, Virginia

Welcome to NR502 GIS Applications in Natural Resources. You can take this course for 1 or 2 credits. There is also an option for 3 credits.

Introduction-Overview. Why use a GIS? What can a GIS do? Spatial (coordinate) data model Relational (tabular) data model

CUYAHOGA COUNTY URBAN TREE CANOPY & LAND COVER MAPPING

Figure 0-18: Dendrogeomorphic analysis of streambank erosion and floodplain deposition (from Noe and others, 2015a)

Introduction to Geographic Information Systems (GIS): Environmental Science Focus

Development and Land Use Change in the Central Potomac River Watershed. Rebecca Posa. GIS for Water Resources, Fall 2014 University of Texas

A Help Guide for Using gssurgo to Find Potential Wetland Soil Landscapes

Quality and Coverage of Data Sources

Evaluating Urban Vegetation Cover Using LiDAR and High Resolution Imagery

Display data in a map-like format so that geographic patterns and interrelationships are visible

Targeted LiDAR use in Support of In-Office Address Canvassing (IOAC) March 13, 2017 MAPPS, Silver Spring MD

Chapter 6. Fundamentals of GIS-Based Data Analysis for Decision Support. Table 6.1. Spatial Data Transformations by Geospatial Data Types

GIS Resources for Local Governments

CHAPTER 1 THE UNITED STATES 2001 NATIONAL LAND COVER DATABASE

SRJC Applied Technology 54A Introduction to GIS

Harrison 1. Identifying Wetlands by GIS Software Submitted July 30, ,470 words By Catherine Harrison University of Virginia

A Basic Introduction to Geographic Information Systems (GIS) ~~~~~~~~~~

Huron Creek Watershed 2005 Land Use Map

Providing Public Access to King County GIS Data. Presented by: Michael Jenkins King County GIS Center Seattle, WA

A Comprehensive Inventory of the Number of Modified Stream Channels in the State of Minnesota. Data, Information and Knowledge Management.

Syllabus Reminders. Geographic Information Systems. Components of GIS. Lecture 1 Outline. Lecture 1 Introduction to Geographic Information Systems

Emergency Planning. for the. Democratic National. Convention. imaging notes // Spring 2009 //

NCTCOG Regional GIS Meeting 6-Years and Going Strong. May 15, 2018 hosted by: Tarrant County

Coastal Riparian Buffers Analysis

Delineation of high landslide risk areas as a result of land cover, slope, and geology in San Mateo County, California

An Internet-based Agricultural Land Use Trends Visualization System (AgLuT)

Globally Estimating the Population Characteristics of Small Geographic Areas. Tom Fitzwater

DGS Digital Geologic Information Resource (DGIR) User Guide

presents challenges related to utility infrastructure planning. Many of these challenges

USING GIS CARTOGRAPHIC MODELING TO ANALYSIS SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF LANDSLIDE SENSITIVE AREAS IN YANGMINGSHAN NATIONAL PARK, TAIWAN

Louisiana Transportation Engineering Conference. Monday, February 12, 2007

Great Lakes Online Watershed Interface W. Elliot, Research Engineer USDA Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station, Moscow, ID March, 2016

Introduction. Project Summary In 2014 multiple local Otsego county agencies, Otsego County Soil and Water

Creation of an Internet Based Indiana Water Quality Atlas (IWQA)

Integrating GIS into West Nile Virus Planning and Surveillance

Trimble s ecognition Product Suite

BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION HABITAT ANALYSIS

MISSOURI LiDAR Stakeholders Meeting

GIS for Surveyors: Wetland Studies and Solutions, Inc.

Web (Java, ArcGIS Server [WebADF, flex, silverlight]) Mobile (ArcGIS Mobile, ArcPad, Windows Mobile) Deskt

KING GEORGE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

GIS for ChEs Introduction to Geographic Information Systems

Geospatial Data, Services, and Products. National Surveying, mapping and geospatial conference

Summary Description Municipality of Anchorage. Anchorage Coastal Resource Atlas Project

Getting to know GIS. Chapter 1. Introducing GIS. Part 1. Learning objectives

Fig 1. Steps in the EcoValue Project

NCTCOG GIS File Locations

4. GIS Implementation of the TxDOT Hydrology Extensions

IMPERIAL COUNTY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT

Satellite Imagery: A Crucial Resource in Stormwater Billing

5/15/ Use of Geographic Information System (GIS) in Grazing Management Muhammad Farooq Hussain Faisal 12-Arid-604 (M.

The Use of Geographic Information Systems (GIS) by Local Governments. Giving municipal decision-makers the power to make better decisions

Erosion Susceptibility in the area Around the Okanogan Fire Complex, Washington, US

Course overview. Grading and Evaluation. Final project. Where and When? Welcome to REM402 Applied Spatial Analysis in Natural Resources.

SAGE. Systems Approach to Geomorphic Engineering. Barnegat Bay Pilot. Heather Jensen Philadelphia District. US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG

Lesson Plan 3 Google Earth Tutorial on Land Use for Middle and High School

Manitoba s Elevation (LiDAR) & Imagery Datasets. Acquisition Plans & Opportunities for Collaboration

Data sources and classification for ecosystem accounting g

UTAH S STATEWIDE GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION DATABASE

To: Ross Martin, Lisa Stapleton From: Brad Lind Subject: Joint Funding Agreement with USGS for 2012 Imagery Date: March 14, 2012.

Urbanization and the Loss of Resource Lands in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed

10/13/2011. Introduction. Introduction to GPS and GIS Workshop. Schedule. What We Will Cover

Imagery and the Location-enabled Platform in State and Local Government

Neighborhood Locations and Amenities

Introduction to GIS I

Accuracy assessment of Pennsylvania streams mapped using LiDAR elevation data: Method development and results

McHenry County Property Search Sources of Information

Data Collection and GIS Applications

Semester Project Final Report. Logan River Flood Plain Analysis Using ArcGIS, HEC-GeoRAS, and HEC-RAS

What are the five components of a GIS? A typically GIS consists of five elements: - Hardware, Software, Data, People and Procedures (Work Flows)

GIS-T 2010 Building a Successful Geospatial Data Sharing Framework: A Ohio DOT Success Story

Schuyler County Idle Farmland Analysis. Conducted by Cornell Cooperative Extension of Schuyler County

StreamStats: Delivering Streamflow Information to the Public. By Kernell Ries

Lesson Plan 3 Land Cover Changes Over Time. An Introduction to Land Cover Changes over Time

Appendix J Vegetation Change Analysis Methodology

Lecture 3. Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources

Remote Sensing the Urban Landscape

GIS Needs Assessment. for. The City of East Lansing

Location Suitability Analysis

Storm Surge Analysis Update Meeting Cross City, Florida June 17, 2014

A Regional Database Tracking Fire Footprint Each Year within the South Atlantic Region: Current Database Description and Future Directions

The Evolution of NWI Mapping and How It Has Changed Since Inception

Title: ArcMap: Calculating Soil Areas for Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plans Authors: Brandy Woodcock, Benjamin Byars

Principals and Elements of Image Interpretation

Transcription:

New Land Cover & Land Use Data for the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Why? The Chesapeake Bay Program (CBP) partnership is in the process of improving and refining the Phase 6 suite of models used to inform actions needed to restore the Chesapeake Bay and to meet the requirements of the Bay Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) pollution limits. Land cover and land use are two of the principal datasets used by the CBP modeling suite to estimate the amount of nutrients and sediments transported from the land to the Bay. In addition, localities can use such data for water resource and environmental planning, the targeting of restoration and conservation efforts, and public education and outreach. What? Over the past three years, the CBP partnership has collected land use (e.g., residential, commercial, agriculture), parcel, impervious surface planimetric, and other data from local governments to improve its characterization of the landscape (Figures 1-2). By combining these local land use datasets with the high-resolution land cover currently being produced, the CBP is able to create a hybrid 10-m resolution land use/land cover raster database ( Phase 6 Land Use Database ) composed of 13 distinct land use/cover datasets, all of which have unique nutrient and sediment loading characteristics. In 2015, the Chesapeake Bay Program (CBP) partnership awarded contracts for the development of new one-meter resolution land cover raster data (Figures 3 & 4) derived from aerial imagery, available LiDAR elevation data, and ancillary datasets for all 206 cities/counties whose boundaries intersect the 64,000 square-mile Bay watershed. These data will extend across the full area of each of these local governments, even those whose boundaries are partially in and partially outside the watershed. Accuracy assessments will be performed on all of these data; thetarget accuracies for each individual class range from 85-95%. Three different contractors are producing the high-resolution land cover data (Figure 5). The Chesapeake Conservancy (CC) is producing land cover data for the District of Columbia, Maryland, New York, and West Virginia. As a subcontractor to CC, the University of Vermont s (UVM) Spatial Analysis Laboratory is producing the land cover data for Delaware and Pennsylvania. Worldview Solutions Incorporated (WSI) is producing the land cover data for Virginia. The one-meter resolution land cover datasets comprise 11 distinct land cover types in a single raster file. All of the land cover classes are mutually exclusive in that every cell on the map represents only one land cover type, e.g., impervious roads, impervious non-roads (Figure 6). In contrast, the Phase 6 Land Use Database consists of 13 distinct rasters that have a coarser, 10- m resolution. Each of the Phase 6 land use rasters has values representing the number of 1-m land cover cells within each 10-m cell. For example, values in the coarsened Impervious Roads raster represent the count of one-meter resolution impervious road cells within each 10-m x 10-m cell. Because there are 100-m 2 in a 10-m cell, the counts range from 0-100 and correspond directly to the percentage of the cell covered by Impervious Roads. In this way, all

of the information in the one-meter resolution land cover datasets is captured within each 10- m cell. However, because each 10-m cell represents a fraction of a particular class within it, the classes frequently overlap along the edges of buildings, roads, forest patches, and other features. For example, a 10-m cell could contain a value of 40 for impervious roads, 25 for turf grass, 15 for tree canopy over turf grass, 10 for non-road impervious, and 10 for tree canopy over impervious (Figure 7). This 10-m cell would contain forty one-meter road cells and therefore be composed of 40% roads. The difference between categorical and fractional cell values becomes readily apparent when overlaying the Phase 6 land use raster datasets where one may see datasets at the top of an overlay obscuring the contents of datasets at the bottom of the overlay (Figures 8 and 9). The CBP selected this approach (10-m resolution cells with fractional values) to make the data more manageable by decreasing the file sizes 100-times and matching the resolution of the 10-m resolution elevation dataset (the best available for the entire watershed). To generate the 13 land use classes from the original 11 land cover classes, some of the onemeter resolution land cover classes are combined (e.g., tree canopy over impervious roads combined with tree canopy over impervious non-roads to generate tree canopy over impervious ) and others divided (e.g., tree canopy split into forest and tree canopy over turf grass ; low vegetation split into turf grass, cropland, and pasture ) 1 with divisions informed by spatial context and ancillary local land use and parcel data (Figure 10). Over the past year, the Maryland Department of the Environment, Maryland Department of Planning, and the Maryland Department of Natural Resources have been working with local governments in Maryland to develop land-use estimates for use in the Phase 6 suite of models. These estimates were derived using methods specifically designed for handling the abundance of highly-detailed spatial data that is unique to Maryland. Over the next six months, Maryland agencies will work with the CBP to jointly assess which data sources and methods provide the best available characterization of land uses to inform the Phase 6 models. Cost? These data are freely available to local governments and other potential users. Both the onemeter resolution land cover and 10-m resolution Phase 6 Land Use Database will be available for download through the internet. In addition, tabular data will be provided that indicates the acreage of each land use informing the CBP partnership s Phase 6 suite of models by modeling segment (i.e., small watersheds within each county). 1 Note that the Phase 6 Land Use Database will be used to determine the total amount of agricultural land (cropland + pasture) within each county. The cropland and pasture classifications will only be used to proportionally allocate detailed data on crop type and pasture reported in the Census of Agriculture to Phase 6 model segments within each county. 2

Data Type and Format? All aerial and satellite imagery as well as elevation data are produced as rasters. Rasters are simply grids of equal-area sized cells (aka pixels ). All of the land cover and land use data produced for the Bay watershed will be stored and distributed as 1-m resolution or 10-m resolution rasters in TIFF format (*.tif) and projected in Albers Equal Area USGS version, NAD 1983, meters. Due to the granularity of the land cover data (1-m x 1-m cells), rasters provide the most efficient data type for storage and analysis. Converting these data directly to vector format would generate very large files with millions of vertices and polygons. While the data could be smoothed or otherwise generalized prior to conversion, doing so would result in the loss of information. When? The high-resolution land cover data are currently under development and will be completed incrementally following a rolling production schedule from January through July 2016. The Phase 6 Land Use Database will be produced concurrently following quality assurance, local review, and an accuracy assessment of the high-resolution data. The Phase 6 Land Use Database will be finalized in September 2016 and all of its data will be accessible and available to the public in November 2016. Local Review? Local jurisdictions outside of Virginia will be asked to review the high-resolution land cover data to help identify systematic errors in the mapping of land cover classes, e.g., impervious surfaces, trees, low vegetation, etc. Following production of the Phase 6 Land Use Database, all local jurisidictions including those in Virginia will be asked to review the Phase 6 Land Uses and overlay data to help identify errors in the mapping of turf grass, agriculture, open space, water, wetlands, roads, sewer service areas, MS4 (Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System), and CSO (Combined Sewer Overflow) boundaries. During the rolling production schedule, CC and UVM will provide state and county planning officials with access to draft land cover datasets for a three-week review. In Virginia, an independent contractor (Sanborn) will assess the quality and accuracy of the WSI land cover products. Once these activities are complete for a set of counties, the CBP will produce the draft Phase 6 Land Use Database for those jurisdictions and post the data on a website for a four-week jurisdictional review. The CBP partnership has developed lists of local government contacts who will be notified when the draft land use data are ready for review. Jurisdictional reviews of the high-resolution land cover data (in all states except Virginia) and Phase 6 Land Use Database (everywhere in the watershed) should focus on the identification of systematic errors, i.e., errors that are pervasive and consistent throughout the datasets, and large-area errors (e.g., isolated misclassification of large features such as business parks, ponds, etc.). Systematic errors can be addressed through changes to decision rules or the inclusion/reinterpretation of ancillary data on roads, impervious surfaces, or land use. Largearea errors can be addressed through manual editing of the high-resolution data. The 3

contractors have limited resources, so they will be unable to address small-area isolated errors such as the misclassification of a few buildings or patches of trees. Once the high-resolution land cover data are finalized, the CBP Office will not make any edits or changes to them. Changes to the Phase 6 Land Use Database -- all 13 raster datasets -- will require the provision or reinterpretation of ancillary data (e.g., parcels, planimetric impervious surfaces, or land use data). CC and UVM will launch separate websites for each batch of high-resolution land cover data that they produce. CC will coordinate with the District of Columbia, Maryland, New York, and West Virginia; UVM will reach out to Delaware and Pennsylvania stakeholders. Both will contact local jurisdictions and provide links to these websites following the production of each batch of data. Virginia s high-resolution land cover data developed by WSI will be available to localities following completion of Sanborn s quality assurance/quality control process and any necessary corrections by WSI. The data will be available on the VGIN GIS Server at: http://gismaps.vita.virginia.gov/arcgis/rest/services The U.S. Geological Survey has developed a website to facilitate review and dissemination of the Phase 6 Land Use Database; the website works best using Google Chrome and can be accessed at: http://chesapeake.usgs.gov/phase6/ More Information? For more information, you can download a recording of a January 29 th Bay Program webinar that provides an overview of the local land cover/use data. In addition, a Frequently Asked Questions document (produced following the webinar), and the data production/review schedule will be available at the following website: http://www.chesapeakebay.net/calendar/event/23454/ Points of Contact Phase 6 Land Use Database: U.S. Geological Survey: Fred Irani, firani@usgs.gov High-resolution Land Cover Datasets: Chesapeake Conservancy: Cassandra Pallai, cpallai@chesapeakeconservancy.org University of Vermont: Jarlath O Neil-Dunne, Jarlath.ONeil-Dunne@uvm.edu Virginia Department of Environmental Quality: James Davis-Martin, James.Davis- Martin@deq.virginia.gov 4

Figures 1 & 2. Local parcel and land use data collected by the CBP Partners. Figures 3 & 4. Example of a recent high-resolution aerial image (left) and 2013 classified land cover dataset (right) for an area in Prince George s County, Maryland. 5

Figure 5. Regions covered by each of the three contractors producing the 2013/14 high-resolution land cover datasets. 6

Figures 6. High-resolution (1-m) representation of roads (black), other impervious surfaces (red), and low vegetation (green). Figure 7. Example of fractional land use composition within one 10-m resolution cell. 7

Figures 8 & 9. Ten-meter resolution land cover data using the same extent as shown in Figure 7. In the left image, the order of the overlay from top to bottom is: roads (black), other impervious (red), and low vegetation (green). In the right image, the data were re-ordered with low vegetation moved on top of roads and other impervious surfaces. Figure 10. Crosswalk of high-resolution land cover types to Phase 6 land uses. 8