International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology (IJMET) Volume 8, Issue 5, May 2017, pp. 280 293, Article ID: IJMET_08_05_030 Available online at http://www.ia aeme.com/ijmet/issues.asp?jtype=ijmet&vtyp pe=8&itype=5 ISSN Print: 0976-6340 and ISSN Online: 0976-6359 IAEME Publication Scopus Indexed IMPACT TESTT ON MOTORCYCLE HELMET FOR DIFFERENT ANGLES USING FINETE ELEMENT ANALYSIS B.Siva Kumar, B.Sai Krishna, M.Raveendra prasad, J.Yaswanth Student, Department of Mechanical Engineering K L University, Vaddeswaram, India. Dr.G.Diwakar Professor, Department o f Mechanical Engineering K L University, Vaddeswaram, India. ABSTRACT A motoben'szy, rcycle cap is the best defensive set out rigging toward the anticipation of head wounds brought on by various cranial effect. A limited component show in view of reasonable geometric elements of a bike head protector is set up, and unequivocal limited component, ansys, is utilized to mimic element reactions at various effect speeds. Top increasing speed and Head Injury Criterion values got from the head frame are utilized to survey the defensive execution of the protective cap. In this present work engine cycle protective cap is outlined and displayed in 3D demonstrating programming Catia. The effect investigation is performed on the cap when crashing to an objective at various paces of 50 Km/hr, 60 Km/hr and 70 km/hr that faces the head protector on the front, right and back headings utilizing ANSYS programming. The materials utilized for the cap is ABS, PVC and PP(polypropylene). Key words: Motorcycle Helmet, Geometric Elements, Head Injury Criterion. Cite this Article: B.Siva Kumar, B.Sai Krishna, M.Raveendra prasad, J.Yaswanth and Dr.G.Diwakar Impact Test on Motorcycle Helmet for Different Angles Using Finete Element Analysis.. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology, 8(5), 2017, pp. 280 293. http://www.iaeme.com/ijmet/issues.asp?jtype=ijmet&vtype=8&i IType=5 1. INTRODUCTION Head protector can shield vehicle riders from extreme wounds amid auto collisions. Additionally, genuine engine cycle mishaps have expanded over the most recent two decades. To outline a useful head protector, it is essential to examine the structure of caps. The fundamental head protector segments are the froth direct and the shell. Essentially, the capacity of the froth is to ingest the majority of the effect vitality, while the capacity of the shell is to oppose infiltration of any outside protest from touching the head and bringing about http://www.iaeme.com/ijmet/index.asp 280 editor@iaeme.com
B.Siva Kumar, B.Sai Krishna, M.Raveendra prasad, J.Yaswanth and Dr.G.Diwakar direct skull harm, and to disseminate the effect stack on a more extensive froth range in this way expanding the froth straight vitality retention limit. The drive resistance test is the primary criteria for shell thickness assurance and, truth be told, bringing about a protective cap with a thicker shell and thusly a weight of around 6 to 8 times when contrasted with the froth liner. On the off chance that a thicker shell is picked, the quality will increment, shockingly, and in addition cost and weight or an option material ought to be considered. For investigation its better outcome head protector outline and material property has been tried and contrasted and standard. 2. THE EVOLUTION OF THE HELMET Another man likewise thought of the thought for a bike protective cap. Teacher C.F. Lombard of the University of Southern California created and protected a head protector that had an inside layer expected to retain and scatter the stun of effect. Be that as it may, early cap models were incapable. It would take many years of research in materials and configuration to make caps work. DESIGN OF HELMET MATERIAL PROPERTIES ABS ABS > Constants Density 1040 kg m^-3 http://www.iaeme.com/ijmet/index.asp 281 editor@iaeme.com
Impact Test on Motorcycle Helmet for Different Angles Using Finete Element Analysis. ABS > Isotropic Elasticity Temperature C Young's Modulus Pa Poisson's Ratio Bulk Modulus Pa Shear Modulus Pa 3.1e+009 0.3 2.5833e+009 1.1923e+009 PPC PPC > Constants Density 900 kg m^-3 PPC > Isotropic Elasticity Temperature C Young's Modulus Pa Poisson's Ratio Bulk Modulus Pa Shear Modulus Pa PVC 2000 0.3 1666.7 769.23 PVC > Constants Density 1450 kg m^-3 PVC > Isotropic Elasticity Temperature C Young's Modulus Pa Poisson's Ratio Bulk Modulus Pa Shear Modulus Pa 4100 0.4 6833.3 1464.3 3. ANALYSIS OF HELMET WITH ABS MATERIAL AT 50 KMPH MESH MODAL http://www.iaeme.com/ijmet/index.asp 282 editor@iaeme.com
B.Siva Kumar, B.Sai Krishna, M.Raveendra prasad, J.Yaswanth and Dr.G.Diwakar INPUT DATA DEFORMATION http://www.iaeme.com/ijmet/index.asp 283 editor@iaeme.com
Impact Test on Motorcycle Helmet for Different Angles Using Finete Element Analysis. Results for 60kmph with ABS Material http://www.iaeme.com/ijmet/index.asp 284 editor@iaeme.com
B.Siva Kumar, B.Sai Krishna, M.Raveendra prasad, J.Yaswanth and Dr.G.Diwakar Results for 70kmph with ABS Material http://www.iaeme.com/ijmet/index.asp 285 editor@iaeme.com
Impact Test on Motorcycle Helmet for Different Angles Using Finete Element Analysis. Analysis of helmet with PPC Material at 50kmph http://www.iaeme.com/ijmet/index.asp 286 editor@iaeme.com
B.Siva Kumar, B.Sai Krishna, M.Raveendra prasad, J.Yaswanth and Dr.G.Diwakar Analysis With PPC at 60kmph http://www.iaeme.com/ijmet/index.asp 287 editor@iaeme.com
Impact Test on Motorcycle Helmet for Different Angles Using Finete Element Analysis. DIRECTIONAL DEFORMATION Analysis With PPC at 70kmph http://www.iaeme.com/ijmet/index.asp 288 editor@iaeme.com
B.Siva Kumar, B.Sai Krishna, M.Raveendra prasad, J.Yaswanth and Dr.G.Diwakar Analysis of helmet with PVC at 50kmph http://www.iaeme.com/ijmet/index.asp 289 editor@iaeme.com
Impact Test on Motorcycle Helmet for Different Angles Using Finete Element Analysis. Analysis With Pvc At 60kmph http://www.iaeme.com/ijmet/index.asp 290 editor@iaeme.com
B.Siva Kumar, B.Sai Krishna, M.Raveendra prasad, J.Yaswanth and Dr.G.Diwakar Analysis With PVC at 70kmph Result comparison table 50 km/h Abs material PPC PVC MIN MAX MIN MAX MIN MAX Stress 4154.4 2.4182e 7 4648.5 2.4168e 7 2946.5 2.4463e 7 Strain 1.8983e -6 0.0078144 2.9112 12105 1.0671 5977.3 Total deformation 0 0.001474 0 2284.3 0 1131.8 Directional deformation -0.00021972 0.00033687-340.54 521.94-174.66 255.98 http://www.iaeme.com/ijmet/index.asp 291 editor@iaeme.com
Impact Test on Motorcycle Helmet for Different Angles Using Finete Element Analysis. Result comparison table 60 km/h Abs material PPC PVC MIN MAX MIN MAX MIN MAX Stress 5006.5 2.9142E 7 5498.9 2.7303e 7 3509.9 2.9482e 7 Strain 2.2877E -6 0.0094173 3.1728 13663 1.2796 7203.7 Total deformation 0 0.0017764 0 2753.1 0 1363.9 Directional deformation -0.00026479 0.00040597-410.49 629.09-210.5 308.45 Result comparison table 70 km/h Abs material PPC PVC MIN MAX MIN MAX MIN MAX Stress 5858.7 3.4102e 7 5922.1 3.2935e 7 4095.3 3.4473e 7 Strain 2.6771e -6 0.01102 3.7156 16498 1.4946 8423.2 Total deformation 0 0.0020787 0 3221.5 0 1594.7 Directional deformation -0.00030986 0.00047507-480.25 736.14-246.28 360.83 4. CONCLUSION AND FUTURE SCOPE As here in this postulation the protective cap is considered for a typical utilization for an ordinary bicycle which is being utilized every day in our life. As here the head protector is planned in Catia V5 and examination is considered in Ansys programming According to the postulation the Analysis is done in various stages, as the materials considered here are PVS, PPC AND ABS and examination is done at various velocities i.e 50kmph, 60kmph and at 70 kmph. As though we check the outcomes if so the protective cap investigation is done at 50kmph, the outcomes got here the anxiety (2.4168e7) is less for PPC material, however while strain (0.0078144) is less for ABS material and going to the disfigurement (0.001474) is likewise low for ABS material as it were. Going to the following examination if so the head protector investigation is done at 60kmph, the outcomes got here the anxiety (2.7303e7) is less for PPC material, yet while strain (0.0094173) is less for ABS material and going to the distortion (0.0017764) is likewise low for ABS material as it were. Going to the following examination if so the head protector investigation is done at 70kmph, the outcomes acquired here the anxiety (3.2935e7) is less for PPC material, yet while strain (0.01102) is less for ABS material and going to the distortion (0.0020787) is additionally low for ABS material as it were. So at long last we can reason that if the cap is made with ABS plastic the head protector is sheltered and gives more existence with solidness http://www.iaeme.com/ijmet/index.asp 292 editor@iaeme.com
B.Siva Kumar, B.Sai Krishna, M.Raveendra prasad, J.Yaswanth and Dr.G.Diwakar REFERENCES [1] B. Aldman, L. Thomgren (1979): The protective effect of crash helmets. A study of 96 motorcycle accidents. 4th International IRCOBI Conference, Göteborg, Sweden. [2] P.V. Hight (1986): An international review of motorcycle crashworthiness. International IRCOBI Conference on Biomechanics of Impacts, Zurich. [3] Dr. M. M. Patil, Dr. Lokesh Bajpai and Dr. P. L. Verma Design and Development of Motorcycle Seat From Ergonomics Point of View With Vibration and Discomfort Analysis. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology, 5(12), 2017, pp. 9 15. [4] COST 32 (1999): Motorcycle Safety Helmet, Final Report of Action. http://www.iaeme.com/ijmet/index.asp 293 editor@iaeme.com