Department of Mechanical Engineering Massachusetts Institute of Technology Modeling, Dynamics and Control III Spring 2002

Similar documents
March 18, 2014 Academic Year 2013/14

Lecture 4. Chapter 11 Nise. Controller Design via Frequency Response. G. Hovland 2004

EE Control Systems LECTURE 14

Lecture 6: Resonance II. Announcements

Delhi Noida Bhopal Hyderabad Jaipur Lucknow Indore Pune Bhubaneswar Kolkata Patna Web: Ph:

Homework 12 Solution - AME30315, Spring 2013

376 CHAPTER 6. THE FREQUENCY-RESPONSE DESIGN METHOD. D(s) = we get the compensated system with :

G(s) = 1 s by hand for! = 1, 2, 5, 10, 20, 50, and 100 rad/sec.

ME2142/ME2142E Feedback Control Systems

5.5 Application of Frequency Response: Signal Filters

MODERN CONTROL SYSTEMS

Function and Impulse Response

Lecture 8. PID control. Industrial process control ( today) PID control. Insights about PID actions

ME 375 FINAL EXAM SOLUTIONS Friday December 17, 2004

EE/ME/AE324: Dynamical Systems. Chapter 8: Transfer Function Analysis

SKEE 3143 CONTROL SYSTEM DESIGN. CHAPTER 3 Compensator Design Using the Bode Plot

Given the following circuit with unknown initial capacitor voltage v(0): X(s) Immediately, we know that the transfer function H(s) is

SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY School of Engineering Science ENSC 320 Electric Circuits II. Solutions to Assignment 3 February 2005.

Lecture 10 Filtering: Applied Concepts

MM1: Basic Concept (I): System and its Variables

ME 375 FINAL EXAM Wednesday, May 6, 2009

Control Systems Analysis and Design by the Root-Locus Method

Root Locus Contents. Root locus, sketching algorithm. Root locus, examples. Root locus, proofs. Root locus, control examples

Lecture #9 Continuous time filter

into a discrete time function. Recall that the table of Laplace/z-transforms is constructed by (i) selecting to get

Clustering Methods without Given Number of Clusters

DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS

Massachusetts Institute of Technology Dynamics and Control II

NAME (pinyin/italian)... MATRICULATION NUMBER... SIGNATURE

DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS Laplace Transforms. Paul Dawkins

4.6 Principal trajectories in terms of amplitude and phase function

Correction for Simple System Example and Notes on Laplace Transforms / Deviation Variables ECHE 550 Fall 2002

Spring 2014 EE 445S Real-Time Digital Signal Processing Laboratory. Homework #0 Solutions on Review of Signals and Systems Material

Root Locus Diagram. Root loci: The portion of root locus when k assume positive values: that is 0

Moment of Inertia of an Equilateral Triangle with Pivot at one Vertex

Linear Motion, Speed & Velocity

( 1) EE 313 Linear Signals & Systems (Fall 2018) Solution Set for Homework #10 on Laplace Transforms

CONTROL SYSTEMS. Chapter 5 : Root Locus Diagram. GATE Objective & Numerical Type Solutions. The transfer function of a closed loop system is

RaneNote BESSEL FILTER CROSSOVER

Chapter 13. Root Locus Introduction

Dimensional Analysis A Tool for Guiding Mathematical Calculations

Solutions. Digital Control Systems ( ) 120 minutes examination time + 15 minutes reading time at the beginning of the exam

ECE-320 Linear Control Systems. Spring 2014, Exam 1. No calculators or computers allowed, you may leave your answers as fractions.

ME 375 EXAM #1 Tuesday February 21, 2006

What lies between Δx E, which represents the steam valve, and ΔP M, which is the mechanical power into the synchronous machine?

ECE382/ME482 Spring 2004 Homework 4 Solution November 14,

Main Topics: The Past, H(s): Poles, zeros, s-plane, and stability; Decomposition of the complete response.

Automatic Control Systems. Part III: Root Locus Technique

ECE 3510 Root Locus Design Examples. PI To eliminate steady-state error (for constant inputs) & perfect rejection of constant disturbances

NCAAPMT Calculus Challenge Challenge #3 Due: October 26, 2011

Digital Control System

( ) 2. 1) Bode plots/transfer functions. a. Draw magnitude and phase bode plots for the transfer function

Chapter 7. Root Locus Analysis

EE Control Systems LECTURE 6

Lecture 8: Period Finding: Simon s Problem over Z N

Chapter #4 EEE Automatic Control

Lecture 5 Introduction to control

Lecture 8 - SISO Loop Design

1 Routh Array: 15 points

Notes on Phase Space Fall 2007, Physics 233B, Hitoshi Murayama

Practice Problems - Week #7 Laplace - Step Functions, DE Solutions Solutions

Physics 2. Angular Momentum. Prepared by Vince Zaccone For Campus Learning Assistance Services at UCSB

Design By Emulation (Indirect Method)

11.2 Stability. A gain element is an active device. One potential problem with every active circuit is its stability

6.302 Feedback Systems Recitation 6: Steady-State Errors Prof. Joel L. Dawson S -

A Simplified Methodology for the Synthesis of Adaptive Flight Control Systems

Uniform Acceleration Problems Chapter 2: Linear Motion

EE105 - Fall 2005 Microelectronic Devices and Circuits

Lecture 9: Shor s Algorithm

Riemann s Functional Equation is Not a Valid Function and Its Implication on the Riemann Hypothesis. Armando M. Evangelista Jr.

Lecture 17: Analytic Functions and Integrals (See Chapter 14 in Boas)

Wolfgang Hofle. CERN CAS Darmstadt, October W. Hofle feedback systems

Regression. What is regression? Linear Regression. Cal State Northridge Ψ320 Andrew Ainsworth PhD

time? How will changes in vertical drop of the course affect race time? How will changes in the distance between turns affect race time?

Stability. ME 344/144L Prof. R.G. Longoria Dynamic Systems and Controls/Lab. Department of Mechanical Engineering The University of Texas at Austin

Chapter 17 Amplifier Frequency Response

Gain and Phase Margins Based Delay Dependent Stability Analysis of Two- Area LFC System with Communication Delays

μ + = σ = D 4 σ = D 3 σ = σ = All units in parts (a) and (b) are in V. (1) x chart: Center = μ = 0.75 UCL =

Problem Set 8 Solutions

MINITAB Stat Lab 3

S_LOOP: SINGLE-LOOP FEEDBACK CONTROL SYSTEM ANALYSIS

Lecture 23 Date:

Math Skills. Scientific Notation. Uncertainty in Measurements. Appendix A5 SKILLS HANDBOOK

Physics 6A. Angular Momentum. Prepared by Vince Zaccone For Campus Learning Assistance Services at UCSB

Figure 1 Siemens PSSE Web Site

The Root Locus Method

Laplace Transformation

Cumulative Review of Calculus

Chapter 2 Sampling and Quantization. In order to investigate sampling and quantization, the difference between analog

6.447 rad/sec and ln (% OS /100) tan Thus pc. the testing point is s 3.33 j5.519

Nonlinear Single-Particle Dynamics in High Energy Accelerators

EELE 3332 Electromagnetic II Chapter 10

Homework 7 Solution - AME 30315, Spring s 2 + 2s (s 2 + 2s + 4)(s + 20)

TMA4125 Matematikk 4N Spring 2016

Assignment for Mathematics for Economists Fall 2016

Singular perturbation theory

Riemann s Functional Equation is Not Valid and its Implication on the Riemann Hypothesis. Armando M. Evangelista Jr.

GNSS Solutions: What is the carrier phase measurement? How is it generated in GNSS receivers? Simply put, the carrier phase

7.2 INVERSE TRANSFORMS AND TRANSFORMS OF DERIVATIVES 281

Question 1 Equivalent Circuits

Transcription:

Department of Mechanical Engineering Maachuett Intitute of Technology 2.010 Modeling, Dynamic and Control III Spring 2002 SOLUTIONS: Problem Set # 10 Problem 1 Etimating tranfer function from Bode Plot. Thi i omething that i very ueful when working with experimental data. It come with practice. If you ee how to do it immediately, great, if not here are ome tip on how to do it a little bit more methodological. It long but hopefully worthwhile. How to obtain a tranfer function from the graph (Melia Way, not necearily the bet way) Step 1: Relative order of ytem Look at Phae diagram. The final value will tell you the relative order of the ytem. Think about it. Each pole at high frequencie will contribute 90 to the phae, while each zero will contribute 90. (Complex pole/zero are made of 2 pole/zero o they contribute / 180 ) You can alo do thi by looking at the final lope of the magnitude repone, but I think it i clearer to look at the phae repone. Now for thi problem we ee that the phae diagram end at 180. Thi tell you that there are 2 more pole than zero in the tranfer function.

Step 2: Number of Pole and zero Now we need to decide how many pole and zero there are in the ytem. Looking at the magnitude diagram we can ee that the initial lope i 20 db/dec, and the final lope i 40 db/dec. Since we never ee a decreae in lope i.e. from 40 db/dec to 20 db/dec, we can aume that there are no zero. So we know we have two pole and no zero. Step 3: Location of Pole and zero Since the magnitude plot tart at a lope of 20 db/dec we know that thi i a type 1 ytem, o we have a pole at 0. We can alo ee thi from the phae diagram ince it tart at 90. Now we can figure out where the econd pole i. By extending the aymptotic line at the beginning and end of the diagram we can ee that they meet at about 5 rad/. Therefore thi i the break frequency of econd pole. Now we know our tranfer function look like: K G ( ) 1 5 The lat thing we need to do i find the gain that give u thi repone Step 4: Finding the Gain Since thi i a Type 1 ytem, the gain will not imply be the point were it croe a it would for a Type 0 ytem. Intead we can figure out the gain by knowing that the pole at 0 would be at 40 db if there were no gain. Intead we can ee that it i more at about 68 db. Therefore the DC gain mut have contributed thi additional 28 db. The gain i then : 20 log K 28dB K 25 25 125 G ( ) ( 5) 1 5 Step 5: MATLAB Check To verify that thi i the correct we can plot it into MATLAB. Indeed the repone i very cloe to our original function.

Part b) ame method Step 1: Relative order of ytem Here we ee that the phae plot tart at 0 and drop down to about 90, which implie a relative order of 1. Notice that even though the phae goe up to about 50, what we care about i the final value for high frequencie. Step 2: Number of Pole and zero Now we know that we have one more pole than zero, but we don t know how many or where they are. We need to carefully analyze thi ytem. Again we look at the lope of the repone. Initially the lope i 0, o we know we have a Type 0 ytem. Then the repone goe up, at a lope of 20 db/dec; o there mut be a zero around 1 rad/. Around 10 rad/ the repone drop and goe down at a lope of about 40 db/dec. Which mean that there mut have been a contribution of 3 pole. One to offet the zero, and 2 more bring the lope down to 40. Then around 20 rad/ we ee another change in lope from 40 db/dec to 20 db/dec, which mut be due to another zero. Therefore we can afely ay that we have 3 pole and 2 zero, with a relative order of 1 a expected. Step 3: Location of Pole and zero By drawing the aymptote a hown in the figure we can etimate the break frequency for the firt zero at 1 rad/. We ee though that the repone increae beyond the expected lope of the aymptote. The only other thing that would caue the repone to rie other than a zero i a econd order pole with ζ < 0.707. So then we know that around a frequency of 10 rad/ we have a complex double pole. In addition around thi area we have an additional imple pole, ince the lope between 10 20 rad/ i 40 db/dec. Thi pole probably lie omewhere between 6 to 20 rad/. Then the zero the that caue the reduction in lope lie around 25 rad/. So our tranfer

function look like: K 1 1 1 25 G( ) 2 1 2ζ 1 10 10 10 Where we till need to find K and ζ. Step 4: Finding the Gain The gain for thi problem will be the y-intercept at low frequencie o: 20 log K 10dB K 0.32. Since the econd order pole caue a light increae in the repone but doen t caue it to hoot up, we can etimate 0.4 ζ < 0. 707, we will chooe ζ 0.6 and check whether thi i viable. Finally we have 0.32 1 1 1 25 12( 1)( 25) ( ) G 2 2 ( 10)( 6 100) 1 2 0.6 1 10 10 10 Step 5: MATLAB Check Again, good correlation with our matlab reult

Problem 2 You are aked to ketch the bode plot o it hould be done by hand. When K 800. 2 2 1 2 1 100 800 1 0.5 800 2) 100)( ( 0.5) ( ) ( K G } { GM 30dB Φ 67 M

The gain margin of 30 db implie that the entire magnitude curve can be hifted up by 30 db, which i the equivalent of lowering the 0 db mark by 30 db. Since we can hift the curve by up to 30 db that mean that the gain can increae from what it i now by a factor of up to: 20log(gain) 30 db gain 31 time. Therefore our value of K can be: 800 < K 800 31 24800 Problem 3 Thi i a very imple problem a oon a you undertand what you are looking at, and what you need to do. a) Firt let remember how we obtain the gain margin, we find the point on the phae diagram where the phae i exactly 180 and then we find the magnitude at the ame frequency and the ditance from the 0dB i the gain margin. In thi problem we are not given a bode plot intead we are given the input/output curve which i eentially how the bode plot i formed. Since we are given input/output curve when the phae i 180, all we need to do i find the gain at thi frequency, which i: output input Therefore the gain margin i: 4.08 db 5 5 or 20log 4.08dB 8 8 b) Now we are aked to find the phae margin. With a bode plot we find the point where the repone hit the 0 db line and then find the phae at the ame frequency. In figure (3d) we are given an input/output curve where the gain i 1 which i 0 db. So, all we need to do i find out how much the inuoid ha been hifted. Input e(t) Output y(t)

The ditance hown i how much the output would need to hift to be at a phae of 180, in other word thi i our phae margin. By etimating thi hift from the graph and converting it to degree, we get that the hift margin i Φ 40 Problem 4 M. You hould not need to do thi by hand, jut ue matlab. Here are the command you need: >> num [22.5] >> den conv ([1 4],[1 0.9 9]) >> bode (num,den) Though it i difficult to ee uing matlab we find that when the phae croe 180 at ω 3.55 rad/ the magnitude i 1.2 db, o the phae margin i 1.2 db. The magnitude will cro the 0 db line twice the firt time the phae about 50, which we dimi. The econd time the phae i about 178, o we ay that the phae margin i 2. Thi ytem i very cloe to intability.

Problem 5 Thi one pecially you hould ue matlab >> num 1.96*conv([1 1.25],[1 1.26 9.87]) >> den conv ([1.015.57],[1.083 17.2]) >> bode (num,den) If thi i ued a PID controller the frequencie reduced will be thoe of the peak of the magnitude repone. Namely ω 0.75 rad/ and ω 4.1 rad/ If you plot thi by hand, you MUST calculate the M p, the peak of the magnitude, and ω r the frequency at which they occur. b) Thee frequencie will be reduced becaue if the pole and zero of the controller match the pole and zero of the diturbance then there will be pole/zero cancellation and the dynamic of the diturbance will be reduced.