Explaining Inflation During the Great Contraction

Similar documents
Searching for the Output Gap: Economic Variable or Statistical Illusion? Mark W. Longbrake* J. Huston McCulloch

The Blue Chip Survey: Moving Beyond the Consensus

Source: US. Bureau of Economic Analysis Shaded areas indicate US recessions research.stlouisfed.org

Estimates of the Sticky-Information Phillips Curve for the USA with the General to Specific Method

EXAMINATION QUESTIONS 63. P f. P d. = e n

Outline. 11. Time Series Analysis. Basic Regression. Differences between Time Series and Cross Section

ES103 Introduction to Econometrics

Resolving the Missing Deflation Puzzle. June 7, 2018

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Economics 134 DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS Spring 2018 Professor David Romer LECTURE 10

MA Macroeconomics 3. Introducing the IS-MP-PC Model

Macroeconomics Field Exam. August 2007

The New Keynesian Model: Introduction

Motivation Non-linear Rational Expectations The Permanent Income Hypothesis The Log of Gravity Non-linear IV Estimation Summary.

Flexible Inflation Forecast Targeting: Evidence for Canada (and Australia)

Efficient Within Country Estimation of the Theories of Nominal Rigidity - Draft

Toulouse School of Economics, Macroeconomics II Franck Portier. Homework 1. Problem I An AD-AS Model

The transmission mechanism How the monetary-policy instrument affects the economy and the target variables

Discussion of "Noisy News in Business Cycle" by Forni, Gambetti, Lippi, and Sala

Non-Linearities in the Output-Inflation Relationship

Introduction to Econometrics

Master 2 Macro I. Lecture 8 : Empirical studies of convergence

Time Series Econometrics For the 21st Century

CHAPTER 5 FUNCTIONAL FORMS OF REGRESSION MODELS

Unemployment Rate Example

Empirical Project, part 1, ECO 672

Lecture on State Dependent Government Spending Multipliers

Warwick Business School Forecasting System. Summary. Ana Galvao, Anthony Garratt and James Mitchell November, 2014

Identifying Aggregate Liquidity Shocks with Monetary Policy Shocks: An Application using UK Data

You are permitted to use your own calculator where it has been stamped as approved by the University.

The multiple regression model; Indicator variables as regressors

Closed economy macro dynamics: AD-AS model and RBC model.

Eco 200, part 3, Fall 2004 Lars Svensson 12/6/04. Liquidity traps, the zero lower bound for interest rates, and deflation

) The cumulative probability distribution shows the probability

MA Macroeconomics 4. Analysing the IS-MP-PC Model

THE CASE OF THE DISAPPEARING PHILLIPS CURVE

NOWCASTING REPORT. Updated: January 4, 2019

Error Statistics for the Survey of Professional Forecasters for Industrial Production Index

Have Economic Models Forecasting Performance for US Output Growth and Inflation Changed Over Time, and When? Not-For-Publication Appendix

NOWCASTING REPORT. Updated: September 23, 2016

What You Match Does Matter: The Effects of Data on DSGE Estimation

Error Statistics for the Survey of Professional Forecasters for Treasury Bond Rate (10 Year)

Questioning The Taylor Rule

Introduction to Macroeconomics

A. Recursively orthogonalized. VARs

S ince 1980, there has been a substantial

Error Statistics for the Survey of Professional Forecasters for Treasury Bill Rate (Three Month)

The TransPacific agreement A good thing for VietNam?

EMPIRICAL ASSESSMENT OF THE PHILLIPS CURVE II

A time series plot: a variable Y t on the vertical axis is plotted against time on the horizontal axis

NOWCASTING REPORT. Updated: July 20, 2018

What Happened to the Phillips Curve in the 1990s in Canada?

Economics 390 Economic Forecasting

Lecture 2 Macroeconomic Model of China by Simultaneous Equations

Applied Microeconometrics (L5): Panel Data-Basics

Estimating Unobservable Inflation Expectations in the New Keynesian Phillips Curve

Approximating Fixed-Horizon Forecasts Using Fixed-Event Forecasts

NOWCASTING REPORT. Updated: August 17, 2018

THE LONG-RUN DETERMINANTS OF MONEY DEMAND IN SLOVAKIA MARTIN LUKÁČIK - ADRIANA LUKÁČIKOVÁ - KAROL SZOMOLÁNYI

The Basic New Keynesian Model. Jordi Galí. June 2008

Research Brief December 2018

Are 'unbiased' forecasts really unbiased? Another look at the Fed forecasts 1

Impact of Capital Gains and Urban Pressure on Farmland Values: A Spatial Correlation Analysis

NOWCASTING REPORT. Updated: September 14, 2018

UNIVERSITY OF OSLO DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS

Identifying the Monetary Policy Shock Christiano et al. (1999)

Aggregate Supply. A Nonvertical AS Curve. implications for unemployment, rms pricing behavior, the real wage and the markup

Can News be a Major Source of Aggregate Fluctuations?

Lars Svensson 10/2/05. Liquidity traps, the zero lower bound for interest rates, and deflation

Strict and Flexible Inflation Forecast Targets: An Empirical Investigation

Estimating and Testing the US Model 8.1 Introduction

Unit 2: Index Numbers

Estimating and Accounting for the Output Gap with Large Bayesian Vector Autoregressions

1.2. Structural VARs

Two Models of Macroeconomic Equilibrium

The Making Of A Great Contraction. With A Liquidity Trap And A Jobless Recovery. Columbia University

Inflation Persistence Revisited

Has the crisis changed the monetary transmission mechanism in Albania? An application of kernel density estimation technique.

Housing and the Business Cycle

S TICKY I NFORMATION Fabio Verona Bank of Finland, Monetary Policy and Research Department, Research Unit

NOWCASTING REPORT. Updated: October 21, 2016

Florian Hoffmann. September - December Vancouver School of Economics University of British Columbia

Functions of One Variable

Periklis. Gogas. Tel: +27. Working May 2017

Combining Macroeconomic Models for Prediction

Equilibrium Conditions for the Simple New Keynesian Model

Forecasting Inflation and Growth: Do Private Forecasts Match Those of Policymakers? William T. Gavin and Rachel J. Mandal

Political Cycles and Stock Returns. Pietro Veronesi

What Drives Oil Price Fluctuations? Revisiting the Role of Oil Supply and Demand Shocks

Animal Spirits, Fundamental Factors and Business Cycle Fluctuations

THE CASE OF THE DISAPPEARING PHILLIPS CURVE

Types of economic data

The Neo Fisher Effect and Exiting a Liquidity Trap

ACE 564 Spring Lecture 8. Violations of Basic Assumptions I: Multicollinearity and Non-Sample Information. by Professor Scott H.

Econ 423 Lecture Notes

Aggregate Demand, Idle Time, and Unemployment

Are Professional Forecasters Bayesian?

Mixed frequency models with MA components

NOWCASTING REPORT. Updated: May 5, 2017

Signaling Effects of Monetary Policy

National Accounts Revisions and Output Gap Estimates in a Model of Monetary Policy with Data Uncertainty

Transcription:

Explaining Inflation During the Great Contraction Robert G. Murphy Department of Economics Boston College Chestnut Hill, MA 02467 murphyro@bc.edu January 4, 2013 ODE Advisor Session, American Economic Association Meetings, San Diego, CA

Overview 1. Document failure of Phillips curve models to accurately explain recent inflation experience in the United States. 2. Illustrate time-varying slope of the Phillips curve. 3. Explore reasons why the slope might vary over time and explicitly account for this time variation. 4. Focus on implications of the sticky-price and stickyinformation approaches to price adjustment. 5. Introduce proxies for the inflation environment and uncertainty about regional economic conditions.

Findings 1. Phillips curve can explain recent behavior of inflation when modified to account for implications of sticky-information approach. 2. Unlike Ball and Mazumder (BPEA 2011), no need to rely on anchored expectations. 3. Able to account for recent behavior of inflation using traditional core measures rather than median inflation: The consumer price index (CPI) less food and energy; The price index for personal consumption expenditures (PCE) less food and energy.

Standard Phillips Curve Model (Gordon, 1983; Fuhrer, 1995; Staiger et al, 1997) (1) π t = π e n t + β u t u t + ε t (2) π t e = 0.25[π t 1 + π t 2 + π t 3 + π t 4 ] (3) n π t = 0.25[π t 1 + π t 2 + π t 3 + π t 4 ]+ β u t u t + ε t where term,. ε t u t u t n is assumed to be uncorrelated with the error

Alternative Measures of Gap Variable (a) π t = 0.25[π t 1 + π t 2 + π t 3 + π t 4 ]+ β[u t u t n ] where β < 0. (b) π t = 0.25[π t 1 + π t 2 + π t 3 + π t 4 ]+ β[y t y t n ] where β > 0.

Table 1: Phillips Curve Estimates for Sample Period 1960:1 to 2007:4 (a) π t = 0.25[π t 1 + π t 2 + π t 3 + π t 4 ]+ β[u t u t n ] (b) π t = 0.25[π t 1 + π t 2 + π t 3 + π t 4 ]+ β[y t y t n ] (a) Unemployment Gap (b) GDP Gap Inflation Measure Total CPI Core CPI Total CPI Core CPI Coefficient for β -0.530 (0.095) -0.498 (0.081) 0.282 (0.048) 0.235 (0.042) RM 1.711 1.465 1.696 1.483 p -value for H 0 : coefficients on lagged inflation sum to one 0.607 0.854 0.891 0.971 Inflation Measure Total PCE Core PCE Total PCE Core PCE Coefficient for β -0.384 (0.071) -0.311 (0.052) 0.199 (0.36) 0.143 (0.027) RM 1.285 0.936 1.281 0.950 p -value for H 0 : coefficients on lagged inflation sum to one 0.666 0.754 0.900 0.744

Figure 1: Natural Rate of Unemployment, 1960:1-2020:4 Percent of Potential Labor Force 5 5.5 6 6.5 1960q1 1970q1 1980q1 1990q1 2000q1 2010q1 2020q1 Long-Term Natural Rate Short-Term Natural Rate Source: Congressional Budget Office

Figure 2: Dynamic Predictions of Inflation for 2008:1-2012:2 Using 1960:1-2007:4 Sample Period 4-Quarter Moving Average (A) Total CPI Inflation Quarterly Percent Change at Annual Rate -10-5 0 5 2000q1 2002q1 2004q1 2006q1 2008q1 2010q1 2012q1 Actual Inflation ST Unemployment Gap Prediction LT Unemployment Gap Prediction GDP Gap Prediction

(B) Total PCE Inflation Quarterly Percent Change at Annual Rate -6-4 -2 0 2 4 2000q1 2002q1 2004q1 2006q1 2008q1 2010q1 2012q1 qdate Actual Inflation ST Unemployment Gap Prediction LT Unemployment Gap Prediction GDP Gap Prediction

Figure 3: Dynamic Predictions of Inflation for 2008:1-2012:2 Using 1960:1-2007:4 Sample Period 4-Quarter Moving Average (A) Core CPI Inflation Quarterly Percent Change at Annual Rate -10-5 0 5 2000q1 2002q1 2004q1 2006q1 2008q1 2010q1 2012q1 Actual Inflation ST Unemployment Gap Prediction LT Unemployment Gap Prediction GDP Gap Prediction

(B) Core PCE Inflation Quarterly Percent Change at Annual Rate -4-2 0 2 4 2000q1 2002q1 2004q1 2006q1 2008q1 2010q1 2012q1 Actual Inflation ST Unemployment Gap Prediction LT Unemployment Gap Prediction GDP Gap Prediction

Figure 5: Dynamic Predictions of Inflation for 2011:1-2012:4 Using 1960:1-2010:4 Sample Period 4-Quarter Moving Average (A) Core CPI Quarterly Percent Change at Annual Rate -2-1 0 1 2 3 2000q1 2002q1 2004q1 2006q1 2008q1 2010q1 2012q1 Actual Inflation ST Unemployment Gap Prediction LT Unemployment Gap Prediction GDP Gap Prediction

(B) Core PCE Quarterly Percent Change at Annual Rate -1 0 1 2 3 2000q1 2002q1 2004q1 2006q1 2008q1 2010q1 2012q1 Actual Inflation ST Unemployment Gap Prediction LT Unemployment Gap Prediction GDP Gap Prediction

Figure 6: Time-Varying Slope Coefficient For Core CPI Inflation 40-Quarter Rolling Samples Centered at Date Shown (A) Short-term Unemployment Gap Coefficient on Gap Variable -2-1.5-1 -.5 0.5 1965q1 1970q1 1975q1 1980q1 1985q1 1990q1 1995q1 2000q1 2005q1

(B) GDP Gap Coefficient on Gap Variable -.2 0.2.4.6.8 1965q1 1970q1 1975q1 1980q1 1985q1 1990q1 1995q1 2000q1 2005q1

Figure 7: Time-Varying Slope Coefficient For Core PCE Inflation 40-Quarter Rolling Samples Centered at Dates Shown (A) Short-term Unemployment Gap Coefficient on Gap Variable -1.5-1 -.5 0.5 1965q1 1970q1 1975q1 1980q1 1985q1 1990q1 1995q1 2000q1 2005q1

(B) GDP Gap Coefficient on Gap Variable -.2 0.2.4.6 1965q1 1970q1 1975q1 1980q1 1985q1 1990q1 1995q1 2000q1 2005q1

Table 2: Phillips Curve Estimates for Core Inflation Sample Periods: 1960:1 to 1984:4 and 1985:1 to 2007:4 (a) π t = 0.25[π t 1 + π t 2 + π t 3 + π t 4 ]+ β[u t u t n ] (b) π t = 0.25[π t 1 + π t 2 + π t 3 + π t 4 ]+ β[y t y t n ] (a) Unemployment Gap Sample Period 1960:1-1984:4 (b) GDP Gap Inflation Measure Core CPI Core PCE Core CPI Core PCE Coefficient for β -0.555 (0.121) -0.353 (0.072) 0.250 (0.061) 0.153 (0.037) RM 1.956 1.169 1.992 1.203 p -value for H 0 : coefficients on lagged inflation sum to one 0.895 0.811 0.950 0.829 Sample Period 1985:1-2007:4 (a) Unemployment Gap (b) GDP Gap Inflation Measure Core CPI Core PCE Core CPI Core PCE Coefficient for β -0.254 (0.069) -0.128 (0.073) 0.155 (0.038) 0.093 (0.041) RM 0.542 0.572 0.535 0.565 p -value for H 0 : coefficients on lagged inflation sum to one 0.666 0.583 0.889 0.731

Figure 10: Dynamic Predictions of Inflation for 2008:1-2012:2 Using 1985:1-2007:4 Sample Period 4-Quarter Moving Average (A) Core CPI Inflation Quarterly Percent Change at Annual Rate -4-2 0 2 4 2000q1 2002q1 2004q1 2006q1 2008q1 2010q1 2012q1 Actual Inflation ST Unemployment Gap GDP Gap

(B) Core PCE Inflation Quarterly Percent Change at Annual Rate -2-1 0 1 2 3 2000q1 2002q1 2004q1 2006q1 2008q1 2010q1 2012q1 Actual Inflation ST Unemployment Gap GDP Gap

Alternative Specifications for Phillips Curve (4) π t = 0.25[π t 1 + π t 2 + π t 3 + π t 4 ]+ β 0 [u t u n t ] + β 1 π t [u t u n t ]+ β 2 σ π t [u t u n t ]+ β 3 σ y t [u t u n t ] where the slope coefficient varies with the inflation environment (π t,σ π t ) and/or regional dispersion in economic conditions (σ y t ): Sticky Price Model: (e.g., Ball, Mankiw, and Romer, BPEA 1988) β 1 < 0, β 2 < 0, β 3 = 0. Sticky Information Model: (e.g., Mankiw and Reis, QJE 2002) β 1 < 0, β 2 < 0, β 3 < 0.

Figure 12: Measures of the Inflation Environment Mean and Standard Deviation of Inflation, Rolling 40-Quarter Samples Centered at Date Shown Core CPI Inflation Percent 0 2 4 6 8 1960q1 1970q1 1980q1 1990q1 2000q1 2010q1 Mean of Inflation Standard Deviation of Inflation

Core PCE Inflation Percent 0 2 4 6 8 1960q1 1970q1 1980q1 1990q1 2000q1 2010q1 Mean of Inflation Standard Deviation of Inflation Note: Data are 4-quarter moving average of the respective series.

Figure 11: Regional Dispersion of Economic Conditions Standard Deviation of State Personal Income Growth Around National Average Percent 0 2 4 6 8 1960q1 1970q1 1980q1 1990q1 2000q1 2010q1 Note: Data are 4-quarter moving average of quarterly standard deviation. Growth rate of personal income is computed as percent change over same quarter a year ago.

Table 3: Phillips Curve Estimates with Level and Variance of Inflation Sample Periods: 1960:1 to 2007:4 and 1960:1 to 2012:2 (a) π t = 0.25[π t 1 + π t 2 + π t 3 + π t 4 ]+ β 0 [u t u t n ] (b) π t = 0.25[π t 1 + π t 2 + π t 3 + π t 4 ]+ β 0 [u t u t n ]+ β 1 π t [u t u t n ]+ β 2 σ t π [u t u t n ] Sample Period 1960:1-2007:4 Inflation Measure Core CPI Core PCE β 0 β 1 β 2 RM p -value for H 0 :β 1 = β 2 = 0 Equation (a) Equation (b) Equation (a) Equation (b) -0.498 0.222-0.311 0.048 (0.081) (0.245) (0.052) (0.189) -0.349-0.066 (0.106) (0.070) 0.441-0.031 (0.193) (0.224) 1.465 1.422 0.936 0.928 0.001 0.079 Sample Period 1960:1 to 2012:2 Inflation Measure Core CPI Core PCE β 0 β 1 β 2 RM p -value for H 0 :β 1 = β 2 = 0 Equation (a) Equation (b) Equation (a) Equation (b) -0.328 0.342-0.208 0.137 (0.066) (0.141) (0.042) (0.093) -0.360-0.057 (0.102) (0.068) 0.425-0.100 (0.186) (0.181) 1.465 1.381 0.944 0.911 0.000 0.000

Table 4: Phillips Curve Estimates with Dispersion of Regional Income Growth Sample Periods: 1960:1 to 2007:4 and 1960:1 to 2012:2 (c) π t = 0.25[π t 1 + π t 2 + π t 3 + π t 4 ]+ β 0 [u t u t n ]+ β 3 σ t y [u t u t n ] (d) π t = 0.25[π t 1 + π t 2 + π t 3 + π t 4 ]+ β 0 [u t u t n ]+ β 1 π t [u t u t n ]+ β 2 σ t π [u t u t n ]+ β 3 σ t y [u t u t n ] Sample Period 1960:1-2007:4 Inflation Measure Core CPI Core PCE β 0 β 1 β 2 β 3 RM p -value for H 0 :β 1 = β 2 = 0 Equation (c) Equation (d) Equation (c) Equation (d) 0.584 0.649 0.429 0.264 (0.240) (0.261) (0.152) (0.185) -0.238 0.013 (0.106) (0.069) 0.488 0.186 (0.187) (0.216) -0.330-0.346-0.226-0.293 (0.069) (0.089) (0.044) (0.061) 1.389 1.371 0.879 0.877 0.035 0.253 Sample Period 1960:1 to 2012:2 Inflation Measure Core CPI Core PCE β 0 β 1 β 2 β 3 RM p -value for H 0 :β 1 = β 2 = 0 Note: π is the inflation rate, Equation (c) Equation (d) Equation (c) Equation (d) 0.653 0.783 0.432 0.432 (0.167) (0.173) (0.108) (0.108) -0.251 0.026 (0.102) (0.067) 0.470 0.035 (0.180) (0.174) -0.347-0.344-0.226-0.277 (0.055) (0.084) (0.035) (0.058) 1.347 1.331 0.865 0.866 0.034 0.541 is the unemployment rate, * is the CBO estimate of the short-

Figure 13: Dynamic Predictions of Inflation for 2008:1-2012:2 Using 1960:1-2007:4 Sample Period Including Interaction Terms for Inflation Environment Core CPI Inflation Quarterly Percent Change at Annual Rate -4-2 0 2 4 6 2000q1 2002q1 2004q1 2006q1 2008q1 2010q1 2012q1 Actual Inflation Predicted Inflation Two-standard-error Confidence Bands

Core PCE Inflation Quarterly Percent Change at Annual Rate -1 0 1 2 3 4 2000q1 2002q1 2004q1 2006q1 2008q1 2010q1 2012q1 Actual Inflation Two-standard-error Confidence Bands Predicted Inflation

Figure 14: Dynamic Predictions of Inflation for 2008:1-2012:2 Using 1960:1-2007:4 Sample Period Including Interaction Term for Regional Dispersion of Income Growth Core CPI Inflation Quarterly Percent Change at Annual Rate -4-2 0 2 4 6 2000q1 2002q1 2004q1 2006q1 2008q1 2010q1 2012q1 Actual Inflation Predicted Inflation Two-standard-error Confidence Bands

Core PCE Inflation Quarterly Percent Change at Annual Rate 0 1 2 3 4 2000q1 2002q1 2004q1 2006q1 2008q1 2010q1 2012q1 Actual Inflation Two-standard-error Confidence Bands Predicted Inflation

Summary 1. Standard Phillips curve models predict ongoing shortfall in economic activity should have led to deflation. 2. Evidence suggests slope of Phillips curve has varied over time and is probably lower today than several decades ago. 3. Account explicitly for reasons why slope may vary by focusing on implications of the sticky-price and stickyinformation approaches to price adjustment. 4. Find that a modified Phillips curve which includes a proxy for the uncertainty of regional economic conditions can explain the recent behavior of inflation.

Future Work 1. Document whether underprediction of inflation has happened in other countries. 2. Explore formal models linking implications of the sticky-information approach to the slope of the Phillips curve. 3. Develop and test other proxies for uncertainty about regional economic conditions.