Some special cases

Similar documents
Outline. Control systems. Lecture-4 Stability. V. Sankaranarayanan. V. Sankaranarayanan Control system

ECE317 : Feedback and Control

ECEN 605 LINEAR SYSTEMS. Lecture 20 Characteristics of Feedback Control Systems II Feedback and Stability 1/27

Control Systems Engineering ( Chapter 6. Stability ) Prof. Kwang-Chun Ho Tel: Fax:

HANDOUT E.22 - EXAMPLES ON STABILITY ANALYSIS

Lecture 4 Classical Control Overview II. Dr. Radhakant Padhi Asst. Professor Dept. of Aerospace Engineering Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore

Software Engineering/Mechatronics 3DX4. Slides 6: Stability

ECE 345 / ME 380 Introduction to Control Systems Lecture Notes 8

7.4 STEP BY STEP PROCEDURE TO DRAW THE ROOT LOCUS DIAGRAM

Lecture 1 Root Locus

Remember that : Definition :

Module 3F2: Systems and Control EXAMPLES PAPER 2 ROOT-LOCUS. Solutions

Controller Design using Root Locus

CHAPTER # 9 ROOT LOCUS ANALYSES

Root Locus Methods. The root locus procedure

EEE 184: Introduction to feedback systems

Chapter 7 : Root Locus Technique

Control Systems Engineering ( Chapter 8. Root Locus Techniques ) Prof. Kwang-Chun Ho Tel: Fax:

Lecture 10: Proportional, Integral and Derivative Actions

Control Systems I. Lecture 7: Feedback and the Root Locus method. Readings: Jacopo Tani. Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control D-MAVT ETH Zürich

ECE317 : Feedback and Control

Chemical Process Dynamics and Control. Aisha Osman Mohamed Ahmed Department of Chemical Engineering Faculty of Engineering, Red Sea University

Test 2 SOLUTIONS. ENGI 5821: Control Systems I. March 15, 2010

9.5 The Transfer Function

Software Engineering 3DX3. Slides 8: Root Locus Techniques

Systems Analysis and Control

STABILITY ANALYSIS. Asystemmaybe stable, neutrallyormarginallystable, or unstable. This can be illustrated using cones: Stable Neutral Unstable

Stability Criterion Routh Hurwitz

I What is root locus. I System analysis via root locus. I How to plot root locus. Root locus (RL) I Uses the poles and zeros of the OL TF

S I X SOLUTIONS TO CASE STUDIES CHALLENGES. Antenna Control: Stability Design via Gain K s s s+76.39K. T(s) =

Control Systems I. Lecture 9: The Nyquist condition

"APPENDIX. Properties and Construction of the Root Loci " E-1 K ¼ 0ANDK ¼1POINTS

Time Response of Systems

ECE 486 Control Systems

Lecture 3: The Root Locus Method

Feedback Control Systems (FCS)

12.7 Steady State Error

Chapter 12. Feedback Control Characteristics of Feedback Systems

Laplace Transform Analysis of Signals and Systems

Raktim Bhattacharya. . AERO 422: Active Controls for Aerospace Vehicles. Basic Feedback Analysis & Design

Stability of Feedback Control Systems: Absolute and Relative

Automatic Control Systems, 9th Edition

STABILITY OF CLOSED-LOOP CONTOL SYSTEMS

Root Locus. Signals and Systems: 3C1 Control Systems Handout 3 Dr. David Corrigan Electronic and Electrical Engineering

Module 07 Control Systems Design & Analysis via Root-Locus Method

Routh-Hurwitz Lecture Routh-Hurwitz Stability test

Radar Dish. Armature controlled dc motor. Inside. θ r input. Outside. θ D output. θ m. Gearbox. Control Transmitter. Control. θ D.

EE302 - Feedback Systems Spring Lecture KG(s)H(s) = KG(s)

Analysis of SISO Control Loops

I Stable, marginally stable, & unstable linear systems. I Relationship between pole locations and stability. I Routh-Hurwitz criterion

Alireza Mousavi Brunel University

(b) A unity feedback system is characterized by the transfer function. Design a suitable compensator to meet the following specifications:

Course roadmap. Step response for 2nd-order system. Step response for 2nd-order system

Chapter 5 THE APPLICATION OF THE Z TRANSFORM. 5.3 Stability

SECTION 5: ROOT LOCUS ANALYSIS

3.4. ZEROS OF POLYNOMIAL FUNCTIONS

Systems Analysis and Control

Power System Operations and Control Prof. S.N. Singh Department of Electrical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur. Module 3 Lecture 8

KINGS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING

Department of Mechanical Engineering

Control Systems. University Questions

Root locus 5. tw4 = 450. Root Locus S5-1 S O L U T I O N S

ME 304 CONTROL SYSTEMS Spring 2016 MIDTERM EXAMINATION II

Nyquist Criterion For Stability of Closed Loop System

Block Diagram Reduction

Automatic Control Systems (FCS) Lecture- 8 Steady State Error

VALLIAMMAI ENGINEERING COLLEGE SRM Nagar, Kattankulathur

2.004 Dynamics and Control II Spring 2008

Time Response Analysis (Part II)

ROOT LOCUS. Consider the system. Root locus presents the poles of the closed-loop system when the gain K changes from 0 to. H(s) H ( s) = ( s)

3.1 Overview 3.2 Process and control-loop interactions

CHBE320 LECTURE X STABILITY OF CLOSED-LOOP CONTOL SYSTEMS. Professor Dae Ryook Yang

ECE382/ME482 Spring 2005 Homework 7 Solution April 17, K(s + 0.2) s 2 (s + 2)(s + 5) G(s) =

a. Closed-loop system; b. equivalent transfer function Then the CLTF () T is s the poles of () T are s from a contribution of a

If you need more room, use the backs of the pages and indicate that you have done so.

The Nyquist criterion relates the stability of a closed system to the open-loop frequency response and open loop pole location.

ECE382/ME482 Spring 2005 Homework 6 Solution April 17, (s/2 + 1) s(2s + 1)[(s/8) 2 + (s/20) + 1]

Homework 7 - Solutions

Controls Problems for Qualifying Exam - Spring 2014

Example on Root Locus Sketching and Control Design

Methods for analysis and control of. Lecture 4: The root locus design method

Methods for analysis and control of dynamical systems Lecture 4: The root locus design method

2.004 Dynamics and Control II Spring 2008

Lecture 5 Rational functions and partial fraction expansion

University of Science and Technology, Sudan Department of Chemical Engineering.

ECE317 : Feedback and Control

Control Systems I. Lecture 7: Feedback and the Root Locus method. Readings: Guzzella 9.1-3, Emilio Frazzoli

5 Root Locus Analysis

EEE 184 Project: Option 1

Theory of Machines and Automatic Control Winter 2018/2019

CHAPTER 1 Basic Concepts of Control System. CHAPTER 6 Hydraulic Control System

Section 7.4: Inverse Laplace Transform

Compensation 8. f4 that separate these regions of stability and instability. The characteristic S 0 L U T I 0 N S

MAS107 Control Theory Exam Solutions 2008

Exercise 1 (MC Questions)

Systems Analysis and Control

INSTITUTE OF AERONAUTICAL ENGINEERING (Autonomous) Dundigal, Hyderabad

100 (s + 10) (s + 100) e 0.5s. s 100 (s + 10) (s + 100). G(s) =

10.1. Square Roots and Square- Root Functions 2/20/2018. Exponents and Radicals. Radical Expressions and Functions

Course roadmap. ME451: Control Systems. What is Root Locus? (Review) Characteristic equation & root locus. Lecture 18 Root locus: Sketch of proofs

Transcription:

Lecture Notes on Control Systems/D. Ghose/2012 87 11.3.1 Some special cases Routh table is easy to form in most cases, but there could be some cases when we need to do some extra work. Case 1: The first element in any one row of the Routh array is zero, but the other elements are not. Why is this a problem? Because, subsequent rows have to be obtained by dividing by this element and if it is zero, we end up with. An Example: D(s) = s 3 3s +2 = s 3 +0s 2 3s +2 = a 0 s 3 + a 1 s 2 + a 2 s + a 3 Then the Routh array is given by, s 3 1 3 s 2 0 2 s 1 0 s 0 We can perhaps guess that there is at least one unstable pole. But how many are there? There are many ways to handle this situation. One is to multiply (s + a) to the original polynomial, where a could be any number. But remember that if you take a to be negative then you must account for it when you are counting the number of poles on the RHS of the s-plane. So, to avoid any confusion select a positive a. In the above example, let us select a = 3. Then, the new characteristic polynomial is, The Routh array is now, ˆD(s) = (s +3)D(s) =(s +3)(s 3 3s +2) = s 4 +3s 3 3s 2 7s +6 = a 0 s 4 + a 1 s 3 + a 2 s 2 + a 1 s + a 0

Lecture Notes on Control Systems/D. Ghose/2012 88 s 4 1 3 6 s 3 3 7 0 s 2 2 3 6 0 s 1 20 0 0 s 0 6 0 0 So, there are 2 changes in sign and so there are two poles. Note that since a is positive, it does not affect the number of poles on the RHS of the s-plane and hence the number of sign changes. It is easy to verify that s 3 3s +2=(s 1) 2 (s +2) A word of caution here. The value of a has to be selected carefully or through trial and error. Not all values of a will serve our purpose. For example, consider a = 1. Then, (s 3 3s +2)(s +1)=s 4 + s 3 3s 2 s +2 The corresponding Rout table is s 4 1 3 2 s 3 1 1 0 s 2 2 2 0 s 1 0 0 0 s 0 So we end up with a row of zeros. There is another method to tackle the above situation. This is by putting a small number ɛ>0 in place of the zero in the Routh array, and then continue. If we do this then, the original Routh array becomes.

Lecture Notes on Control Systems/D. Ghose/2012 89 s 3 1 3 s 2 ɛ 2 s 1 3ɛ 2 ɛ 0 s 0 2 Now, for ɛ>0, the term ( 3ɛ 2)/ɛ is a negative number that approaches 2/ɛ as ɛ 0. So, there are two sign changes. A word of caution: The ɛ method does not always work, especially when there are two pure imaginary roots. Case 2: When all the numbers in a row in the Routh array are zeros, then one of the following may be true. 1. There is a pair of real roots with opposite signs (See Figure 11.5(a)). 2. There is a pair of pure imaginary roots (See Figure 11.5(b)). 3. There are pairs of complex conjugate roots placed symmetrically about the origin of the s-plane (See Figure 11.5(c)). Figure 11.5: Pole locations for Case 2 To handle this case, follow the procedure given below. 1. Form an auxiliary equation by taking its coefficients from the row just above the rowofzeros 1. 1 If the auxiliary equation has order two, then there are two equal and opposite roots. If it has order four, then there must be two pairs of equal and opposite roots. If the auxiliary equation has odd order, then one root is on the origin and the rest are distributed according to the rules governing even order auxiliary equation. Moreover, all these roots can be obtained by simply solving for the roots of the auxiliary equation.

Lecture Notes on Control Systems/D. Ghose/2012 90 2. Take its derivative with respect to s. 3. Replace the row of zeros with the coefficients of the derivative of the auxiliary equation. 4. Continue with the Routh array. The number of sign changes indicates the number of poles on the RHS of the s-plane 2. An Example: The Routh array is, D(s) =s 4 + s 3 3s 2 s +2 s 4 1 3 2 s 3 1 1 0 s 2 2 2 0 coefficients of auxiliary equation s 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 new s 1 row s 0 2 0 The s 1 row is all zeros, so the auxiliary equation is formed from the s 2 row as, which on differentiating, A(s) = 2s 2 +2 da(s) = 4s s This is used to obtain the new fourth row. So, there are two sign changes and the equation has two poles on the RHS. In fact, it can be verified that, D(s) =s 4 + s 3 3s 2 s +2=(s 1) 2 (s +2)(s +1) 2 However, note that there may not be any sign changes at all. In which case, it implies that there are no roots with positive real parts or no roots on the RHS of the s-plane. But the solution of the auxiliary equation will reveal that there are roots on the imaginary axis. So, just examining the sign of the first column is not enough but we need to also evaluate the roots of the auxiliary equation.

Lecture Notes on Control Systems/D. Ghose/2012 91 Another Example: The Routh array is, D(s) =s 6 + s 5 2s 4 3s 3 7s 2 4s 4 s 6 1 2 7 4 s 5 1 3 4 0 s 4 1 3 4 0 auxiliary equation s 3 0 0 0 0 4 6 0 0 new row s 2 6/4 4 0 0 s 1 50/3 0 0 0 s 0 4 0 0 0 The auxiliary equation and its derivative are, A(s) = s 4 3s 2 4=0 da(s) s = 4s 3 6s From the Routh array, we can see that there is one sign change and so there is one root on the RHS of the s-plane. It can be verified that, D(s) = s 6 + s 5 2s 4 3s 3 7s 2 4s 4 = (s +2)(s 2)(s 2 +1)(s 2 + s +1) Note that there is a pair of roots on the imaginary axis. auxiliary equation. Examine the roots of the A(s) =s 4 3s 2 4=(s 2 4)(s 2 +1) Hence, some of the roots of the original equation (especially those that were causing the zero row!) can be identified by just solving the auxiliary equation.

Lecture Notes on Control Systems/D. Ghose/2012 92 A word of caution: Routh-Hurwitz criterion can be applied only when the coefficients are real (not complex). Another interesting result: If any element in any row of the Routh array is negative then the system is unstable. 11.4 Application of Routh-Hurwitz Criterion Consider the following feedback system. Let Figure 11.6: A feedback system with proportional control The closed-loop transfer function is G(s) = The denominator polynomial is, The Routh array is, G 1 (s) = G 2 (s) = k 2 = = s +1 (s +2)(s 3) k 1 G 1 (s) 1+k 1 G 1 (s)g 2 (s) k 1 (s +1) (s +2)(s 3) + k 1 k 2 (s +1) k 1 (s +1) s 2 +(k 1 k 2 1)s +(k 1 k 2 6) D(s) =s 2 +(k 1 k 2 1)s +(k 1 k 2 6) s 2 1 k 1 k 2 6 s 1 k 1 k 2 1 0 s 0 k 1 k 2 6 0

Lecture Notes on Control Systems/D. Ghose/2012 93 For the system to be stable k 1 k 2 > 6 and k 1 k 2 > 1 which implies that any value of k 1 and k 2 such that k 1 k 2 > 6 should make the system stable. Another Example: Let The overall transfer function is, Figure 11.7: A more complicated feedback system G(s) = The characteristic polynomial, G 1 (s) = G 2 (s) = s +1 s(s T ) 1 1+sQ (s + 1)(1 + sq) s(s T )(1 + sq)+(s +1) D(s) = s(s T )(1 + sq)+(s +1) = Qs 3 +(1 TQ)s 2 +(1 T )s +1 Just going by the necessary condition that says that all coefficients have to be positive in order for the system to be stable we can write Q>0, TQ < 1, and T<1 But this is not sufficient. So, let us form the Routh array, s 3 Q 1 T s 2 1 TQ 1 s 1 (1 T ) Q 1 TQ 0 s 0 1 0

Lecture Notes on Control Systems/D. Ghose/2012 94 So, suppose we assume Q>0 then, Q > 0 1 TQ > 0 TQ < 1 (1 T ) Q 1 TQ > 0 (1 T ) > Q 1 TQ Since TQ < 1, we can write the last inequality as, (1 T )(1 TQ) >Q (1 T ) (1 T )TQ > Q (1 T ) >Q[(1 T )T +1] 1 T Q< 1+T T 2 Can T>1? No, because then 1 T will be negative and the previous inequality will be violated as Q>0. Can T<0? Yes, in fact so long as 0 <T < 5 1 2, we have a feasible solution for Q. This can be easily shown. Look at the following table where we get the range of Q for some given values of T that will satisfy the inequality. T (1 T )(1 TQ) >Q Q 0 Q<1 0 <Q<1 0.1 Q<0.82 0 <Q<0.82 0.2 Q<0.487 0 <Q<0.487 0.4 Q<0.483 0 <Q<0.483 0.8 Q<0.174 0 <Q<0.174 0.1 Q<1.23 0 <Q<1.23

Lecture Notes on Control Systems/D. Ghose/2012 95 Figure 11.8: The feasible region in the (T,Q)-space PROBLEM SET 5 1. Use the Hurwitz determinants to find the stability of systems having the following characteristic equations: (a) s 3 +20s 2 +9s + 100 = 0 (b) 3s 4 +10s 3 +5s 2 + s +2=0 (c) s 4 +2s 3 +6s 2 +8s +8=0 2. Use the Routh-Hurwitz criterion to find the stability of systems having the following characteristic equations: (a) s 3 +20s 2 +9s + 200 = 0 (c) s 6 +2s 5 +8s 4 +12s 3 +20s 2 +16s +16=0 3. Consider the following characteristic equations. Determine the values of K that corresponds to a stable system. Use the Routh-Hurwitz criterion. (a) s 4 +22s 3 +10s 2 +2s + K =0 (b) s 4 +20Ks 3 +5s 2 +(10+K)s +18=0 (c) s 3 +(K +0.5)s 2 +4Ks +50=0 4. Consider the following system with a unity feedback:

Lecture Notes on Control Systems/D. Ghose/2012 96 G(s) = K s(1 + Ts) (a) What would be the values of K and T to ensure stability? (b) Suppose we want the poles to be on the left of the line s = 3, then what would be the values of K and T to satisfy this requirement? (c) Plot the feasible values of K and T on the (K, T) plane. (d) Repeat (a), (b), and (c) when G(s) = K(s +1) s(1 + Ts)(1+2s)