Galaxy Clusters with XEUS. Silvano Molendi Stefano Borgani Stefano Ettori

Similar documents
Thermo- and chemo-dynamics of the ICM with simulations

Physics of the hot evolving Universe

AC Fabian, M. Cappi, J Sanders. Cosmic Feedback from AGN

MASS PROFILES OF X-RAY BRIGHT RELAXED GROUPS: METHODS AND SYSTEMATICS

The perspective of X-ray galaxy clusters with the XIFU/Athena instrument

Measuring the Neutron Star Mass-Radius Relationship with X-ray Spectroscopy

Athena Athena+ Towards a European Large X-ray Observatory. Mike Watson University of Leicester. Athena+

Observational Cosmology

X-raying High-Redshift AGNs and the First Black Holes: From Chandra to Lynx

Joint X ray/sze analysis of the intra cluster medium

GALAXIES. Edmund Hodges-Kluck Andrew Ptak

An end-to-end X-IFU simulator: constraints on ICM kinematics

Surveys for high-redshift (z>6) AGN with AXIS (cf. Athena) James Aird. University of Cambridge (-> University of Leicester)

Clusters and Groups of Galaxies

Advanced Telescope for High Energy Astrophysics

Supernova Remnant Science with AXIS. Brian Williams & Hiroya Yamaguchi

Cosmology with galaxy clusters?

Paul Plucinsky on behalf of Randall Smith on behalf of the ESA JAXA NASA IXO team

Mapping the non thermal emission in Coma cluster of galaxies using the FeXXV/FeXXVI line ratio

Chemical Enrichment History Of Abell 3112 Galaxy Cluster Out To The Virial Radius

Baryon Census in Hydrodynamical Simulations of Galaxy Clusters

Solving. Andrey Kravtsov The University of Chicago Department of Astronomy & Astrophysics Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics

Trends in Intracluster Metallicity

Kirkpatrick-Baez optics for the Generation-X mission

Future X-rayX Spectroscopy Missions. Jan-Willem den Herder

Galaxy clusters from cosmological hydrodynamical simulations: the intracluster medium

NuStar has similar area kev, Astro-H better at E> 80 Kev

Neutron Stars at X-ray Wavelengths: NASA's Constellation-X Mission. Divas Sanwal (JHU/GSFC) Constellation-X NASA GSFC

Extended X- ray emission from PSR B /LS 2883 and other gamma- ray binaries

Astrophysics and Cosmology with Galaxy Clusters (an overview) Hans Böhringer Max-Planck-Institut für extraterrestrische Physik, Garching

Clusters: Observations

METAL ABUNDANCES IN THE OUTSKIRTS OF

4U E. Bozzo. M. Falanga, A. Papitto, L. Stella, R. Perna, D. Lazzati G. Israel, S. Campana, V. Mangano, T. Di Salvo, L.

Galaxy groups: X-ray scaling relations, cool cores and radio AGN

Galaxy formation and evolution. Astro 850

X- ray surface brightness fluctuations and turbulence in galaxy clusters. Jeremy Sanders. Andy Fabian. Sanders & Fabian 2011, MNRAS, submitted

Clusters: Observations

Course of Galaxies course organizer: Goeran Ostlin ESSAY. X-ray physics of Galaxy Clusters

X-ray and Sunyaev-Zel dovich Effect cluster scaling relations: numerical simulations vs. observations

Cosmology The Road Map

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 6 May 2004

ASTRONOMY QUALIFYING EXAM August 2014

Observational Evidence of AGN Feedback

The gas-galaxy-halo connection

Spectral Analysis of the Double Pulsar PSR J with XMM-Newton

Astronomy. Catherine Turon. for the Astronomy Working Group

Cooling Limits for the

Publ. Astron. Obs. Belgrade No. 86 (2009), TURKISH NATIONAL OBSERVATORY (TUG) VIEW OF CLUSTERS OF GALAXIES

Galaxy clusters and the cosmic cycle of baryons across cosmic times A Whitepaper Submitted to the Decadal Survey Committee

Scientific cases for Simbol-X of interest of the Italian community

Sources of scatter in cluster mass-observable relations

Metals in clusters of galaxies observed with Suzaku and XMM- Newton

v Characteristics v Possible Interpretations L X = erg s -1

SZ/X-ray Joint Analysis of the ICM with APEX-SZ Data

ATHENA Mission Design and ESA Status. David Lumb ESA Study Scientist MPE Jan 13 th 2012

ROSAT Roentgen Satellite. Chandra X-ray Observatory

Embedded Spiral Patterns in the massive galaxy cluster Abell 1835

New generation X-ray telescope

A Cluster of Galaxies, Abell 496

The Turmoil in IC1262

Chandra Analysis of a Possible Cooling Core Galaxy Cluster at z = 1.03

Hot Gas Halos in Early-Type Galaxies

Cluster Thermodynamics: Entropy

X-Ray observability of WHIM and our new mission concept DIOS Intergalactic. Oxygen. Surveyor ) Noriko Yamasaki ISAS/JAXA

Cosmic Rays in Galaxy Clusters: Simulations and Perspectives

The quest for early Black Holes

Supernova remnants: X-ray observations with XMM-Newton

Part 2. Hot gas halos and SMBHs in optically faint ellipticals. Part 3. After Chandra?

LOFAR Observations of Galaxy Clusters

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 1 Nov 2006

Observing GRB afterglows with SIMBOL-X

Quasars ASTR 2120 Sarazin. Quintuple Gravitational Lens Quasar

Non-thermal hard X-ray emission from M87

Astronomy. Astrophysics. The gas distribution in the outer regions of galaxy clusters

NuSTAR observation of the Arches cluster: X-ray spectrum extraction from a 2D image

X-ray Emission from O Stars. David Cohen Swarthmore College

80 2 Observational Cosmology L and the mean energy

The Hot Gaseous Halos of Spiral Galaxies. Joel Bregman, Matthew Miller, Edmund Hodges Kluck, Michael Anderson, XinyuDai

Name: unid: Foundations of Astronomy ASTR/PHYS Final Exam

Radio emission from galaxies in the Bootes Voids

Spatially Resolved Chandra HETG Spectroscopy of the NLR Ionization Cone in NGC 1068

CONTENTS AIM OF THE PROJECT. INTRODUCTION: AGNs, XMM-Newton, ROSAT. TECHNIQUES: IDL, SQL, Catalogues RESULTS SUMMARY DESIRED OUTPUTS QUESTIONS

Cosmic ray feedback in hydrodynamical simulations. simulations of galaxy and structure formation

The Swift GRB MIDEX. Neil Gehrels May 20, 2002

High redshift clusters and their evolution. M.Arnaud (CEA-Sap Saclay France)

Probing the Outskirts of Strongly Merging Double Clusters

Cool Core Clusters in the Magneticum Pathfinder Simulation

Unusual orbits in the Andromeda galaxy Post-16

Results from the Chandra Deep Field North

The Bright Side of the X-ray Sky The XMM-Newton Bright Survey. R. Della Ceca. INAF Osservatorio Astronomico di Brera,Milan

Tidal disruption events from the first XMM-Newton Slew Survey

Energy Balance in Clusters of Galaxies. Patrick M. Motl & Jack O. Burns Center for Astrophysics and Space Astronomy University of Colorado at Boulder

CLASSIFYING SUPERNOVA REMNANT SPECTRA WITH MACHINE LEARNING

SZ Effect with ALMA. Kaustuv moni Basu (MPIfR / Universität Bonn)

Title Sunyaev Zel dovich Signal & Cross Correlations

A search for burst spectral features with NICER. Jérôme Chenevez Gaurava Jaisawal DTU Space

Gravitational Lensing of the Largest Scales

Where are the missing baryons? Craig Hogan SLAC Summer Institute 2007

Note on a polytropic β model to fit the X-ray surface brightness of clusters of galaxies

Wide- Field X- ray Surveys Stefano Borgani INAF OA Trieste Dept. of Physics Univ. Trieste

Transcription:

Galaxy Clusters with XEUS Silvano Molendi Stefano Borgani Stefano Ettori

Cosmic Vision Under the Cosmic Vision theme "The Universe taking shape" Investigation of galaxy clusters is declared to be amongst the top priority science goals for XEUS

Questions 1.How does XEUS address the scientific goals 2.What happens in the event of a factor of ~2 descoping

Clusters Simplified view cluster may be divided in 2 regions: 1. An inner one, often dominated by a cool core where feedback mechanisms play an important role 2. An outer one where the virialization process is taking place.

XEUS XEUS is much better at collecting photons than previous experiments not that much better at characterizing lower contrast regions SB_sou/SB_bkg better only by a factor of a few NFI migh be able to extend measures of x-ray emission to larger radii

Cores At larger distances we will have less details, however data quality will be more than enough to study how these regions evolve through cosmic time. These results will help us understand issus in structure formation from downsizing to

Physics and mass distribution of evolving clusters Characterization of dynamical, therm dynam and chemical properties of cluster from the local universe to z~1 On regions extending out to 1/3 ~ 1/2 of virial radius Measurements will provide valuable information to help us understand how clusters evolve through cosmic time Caveat: objects will not be discovered by XEUS, have to come from other experiments SZ surveys, X-ray surveys etc.

Where does the limit come from? z=1, L bol =7.7e43 erg/s, kt=2kev R<0.25R 180 100ks with NFI 0.2R 180 <R<0.3R 180 R 500 500 ~ ½ R 180 ~ ½ R vir

The Background

The Background Fe L Si K S K

NFI leading instrument Thorough Background characterization is mandatory!

Cores Background is the major limitation at large radii no such problem exists for cores XEUS will do a great job on cluster cores, particularly cool cores, both in the local universe and at higher redshifts Combination of huge throughput with almost Chandra like spatial resolution and few ev spectral resolution will provide impressive results

Cores NFI will open up the field of dynamic studies (bulk motions/turbulence/viscosity) Chemical structure Thermo-dynamics

Chemical and thermal properties of first clusters Very little is known of these objects today what do the first clusters look like? what are the their dynamic, thermodynamic, chemical properties, do they host cool cores?

How does a z=2 cluster look like? The spider-web galaxy: the assembly of a BCG @ z=2.16 (Miley et al. 06)? 40 kpc

Chemical and thermal properties of first clusters From simulations Borgani Saro Fabjan estimate that a M vir ~1.3e14 M sol @ z=0 @ z=2.1 M 500 ~2.3e13 M sol, R 500 ~500 kpc, Lx[0.5-2] ~7e43 cgs, Tsl(< r500 ) ~ 1.7 kev Z Fe 0.3 Z sol Estimates of T, Z should be possible, much depends on SB distribution Fe ~

Descoping Most critical component is the telescope Difficulty in getting both the large throughput and the high angular resolution at the same time What happens if we loose a factor of 2 in Eff.Area or PSF?

Effective area vs resolution trade-off Eff.. area reduction 5m 2 -> 3m 2 reduction in focal length 35m -> 25m (keep instrumental bkg down) increase in FOV loss is not irreparable, can be compensated by increase of exp time moreover loss in eff area in part compensated by increase of FOV (larger region of cluster can be imaged)

Effective area vs resolution trade-off Angular resolution hard limit is somewhere btwn 5-10 arcsec, Dictated by request of detecting and characterizing cluster from formation epoch to present date (8kpc = 1arcsec @ z=2) z

What if the descoping is more severe This is not XEUS anymore! Do we want to go ahead with that? Adjusting scientific goals from current XEUS science goals is not the way to go Thorough review of science goals would be mandatory

What if the descoping is more severe Very much depends on the nature and on the severity of the descoping. If, for example, the effective area had to be reduced to within a factor of ~5 of XMM-Newton area, say <2m 2 or less, than a thorough redisign of the mission would be inevitable. Various options for clusters, however it is probably premature to discuss them now

Summary XEUS will address a number of highly important issues on evolving cluster and on the formation process out to z~2. Measures will extend to 1/3 ~ 1/2 R vir, perhaps more if bkg characterization is given high priority Major advance on core regions. Moderate descoping is not a showstopper More significant descoping,, this is not XEUS anymore, a thorough reconsideration of science case.