On the formation of the Martian moons from a circum-mars accretion disk

Similar documents
The origin of the Martian moons revisited

New results on the formation of the Moon

The Earth-Moon system. Origin of the Moon. Mark Wyatt

The Earth-Moon system. Origin of the Moon. Mark Wyatt

EXOPLANET LECTURE PLANET FORMATION. Dr. Judit Szulagyi - ETH Fellow

Accretion of Phobos and Deimos in an extended debris disc stirred by transient moons

Planet formation in protoplanetary disks. Dmitry Semenov Max Planck Institute for Astronomy Heidelberg, Germany

Phys 214. Planets and Life

Origin of the Solar System

Recent origin of Saturn s moonlets and F-ring from rings viscous spreading

PLANETARY FORMATION THEORY EXPLORING EXOPLANETS

Tides and Lagrange Points

Solar System evolution and the diversity of planetary systems

Equation of orbital velocity: v 2 =GM(2/r 1/a) where: G is the gravitational constant (G=6.67x10 11 N/m 3 kg), M is the mass of the sun (or central

Accretion of Uranus and Neptune

Astronomy 405 Solar System and ISM

Dynamically Unstable Planetary Systems Emerging Out of Gas Disks

SATURN, tides, rings, satellites, and so on... Aurélien CRIDA

Inner Planets (Part II)

Definitions. Stars: M>0.07M s Burn H. Brown dwarfs: M<0.07M s No Burning. Planets No Burning. Dwarf planets. cosmic composition (H+He)

What is it like? When did it form? How did it form. The Solar System. Fall, 2005 Astronomy 110 1

Chapter 15: The Origin of the Solar System

Planet Formation: theory and observations. Sean Raymond University of Colorado (until Friday) Observatoire de Bordeaux

SBAG GOALS Origin of the Solar System Theme

Origin of the Difference of the Jovian and Saturnian Satellite Systems

Origin of the Solar System

Exoplanets: a dynamic field

Accretion of Planets. Bill Hartmann. Star & Planet Formation Minicourse, U of T Astronomy Dept. Lecture 5 - Ed Thommes

When satellites have satellites: The story of Iapetus

The dynamics of extra-solar planets

F. Marzari, Dept. Physics, Padova Univ. Planetary migration

Survey of the Solar System. The Sun Giant Planets Terrestrial Planets Minor Planets Satellite/Ring Systems

PLANETARY MIGRATION A. CRIDA

Tides on Earth, in the Solar System and Beyond..

Formation of Planets around M & L dwarfs

Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune: their formation in few million years

Origins of Gas Giant Planets

Unit 5 Gravitation. Newton s Law of Universal Gravitation Kepler s Laws of Planetary Motion

The Coriolis effect. Why does the cloud spin? The Solar Nebula. Origin of the Solar System. Gravitational Collapse

Forming terrestrial planets & impacts

Kozai-Lidov oscillations

Icarus 211 (2011) Contents lists available at ScienceDirect. Icarus. journal homepage:

Dr G. I. Ogilvie Lent Term 2005 INTRODUCTION

Class 15 Formation of the Solar System

Lecture Outlines. Chapter 15. Astronomy Today 7th Edition Chaisson/McMillan Pearson Education, Inc.

Joy of Science Experience the evolution of the Universe, Earth and Life

Astronomy 241: Review Questions #2 Distributed: November 7, 2013

If your plan is for one year, plant rice. If your plan is for 100 years, educate children. Confucius

Astronomy 1140 Quiz 4 Review

PSI AP Physics 1 Gravitation

Slide 1 / The discovery of Universal Gravitation is associated with: Robert Hook Isaac Newton James Joule Max Plank Christian Huygens

6 th lecture of Compact Object and Accretion, Master Programme at Leiden Observatory

Dynamical properties of the Solar System. Second Kepler s Law. Dynamics of planetary orbits. ν: true anomaly

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.ep] 23 Mar 2010

Planetary Interiors. Read chapter 6!! EAS 4803/ CP 38:1

On the Origin of the Rocky Planets, Fugue in Venus Megacollision

Observational Cosmology Journal Club

Heading for death. q q

Planetary system dynamics. Planetary migration Kozai resonance Apsidal resonance and secular theories Mean motion resonances Gravitational scattering

A REGION VOID OF IRREGULAR SATELLITES AROUND JUPITER

Lecture 16. How did it happen? How long did it take? Where did it occur? Was there more than 1 process?

[19] Jovian Planet Moons and Rings (11/2/17)

Planetary Interiors. Earth s Interior Structure Hydrostatic Equilibrium Heating Constituent Relations Gravitational Fields Isostasy Magnetism

The dynamical evolution of the asteroid belt in the pebble accretion scenario

Internal structure and atmospheres of planets

Mars Growth Stunted by an Early Orbital Instability between the Giant Planets

The primordial excitation and clearing of the asteroid belt Revisited

II Planet Finding.

Earth 110 Exploration of the Solar System Assignment 2: Solar System Formation Due in class Tuesday, Jan. 26, 2016

Astronomy 405 Solar System and ISM

Planet formation and (orbital) Evolution

Comparative Planetology I: Our Solar System

Tides are Important EAS 4803/ CP 7:1

Gravitation. Makes the World Go Round

Regular Features of the Solar System

Minimum Mass Solar Nebulae, Nice model, & Planetary Migration.

Constructing the Moon

The Jovian Planets. Why do we expect planets like this in the outer reaches of the solar system?(lc)

Formation of the Solar System Chapter 8

RING DISCOVERED AROUND DWARF PLANET

Test 4 Final Review. 5/2/2018 Lecture 25

Tidal Forces. Effects of Tidal Forces. The Roche Distance: Tidal Breakup

Dr. Steven Ball LeTourneau University

Overview of Solar System

2/24/2014. Early Earth (Hadean) Early Earth. Terms. Chondrule Chondrite Hadean Big Bang Nucleosynthesis Fusion Supernova

Planetary Interiors. Earth s Interior Structure Hydrostatic Equilibrium Heating Constituent Relations Gravitational Fields Isostasy Magnetism

Exam# 2 Review. Exam #2 is Wednesday November 8th at 10:40 AM in room FLG-280

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.ep] 12 Dec 2016

Newton's Law of Universal Gravitation

Testing Theories of Planet Formation & Dynamical Evolution of Planetary Systems using Orbital Properties of Exoplanets

Planet disk interaction

Extrasolar Planets. Today. Dwarf Planets. Extrasolar Planets. Next week. Review Tuesday. Exam Thursday. also, Homework 6 Due

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.ep] 8 Sep 2016

Astronomy 1140 Quiz 3 Review

EART162: PLANETARY INTERIORS

Moon Obs #1 Due! Moon visible: early morning through afternoon. 6 more due June 13 th. 15 total due June 25 th. Final Report Due June 28th

PLANETARY FORMATION 5) THE SOLAR SYSTEM : GRAND TAK & NICE MODEL. Aurélien CRIDA

Physics Mechanics Lecture 30 Gravitational Energy

EART164: PLANETARY ATMOSPHERES

Physics 1305 Notes: The Outer Solar System

Transcription:

ROYAL OBSERVATORY OF BELGIUM On the formation of the Martian moons from a circum-mars accretion disk Rosenblatt P. and Charnoz S. 46 th ESLAB Symposium: Formation and evolution of moons Session 2 Mechanism of formation: Moons of terrestrial planets June 26 th 2012 ESTEC, Noordwijk, the Netherlands.

The origin of the Martian moons? Phobos (Viking image) Phobos (MEX/HRSC image) Size: 13.0km x 11.39km x 9.07km Unlike the Moon of the Earth, the origin of Phobos & Deimos is still an open issue. Deimos (Viking image) Size: 7.5km x 6.1km x 5.2km Capture or in-situ?

1. Arguments for in-situ formation of Phobos & Deimos Near-equatorial, near-circular orbits around Mars ( formation from a circum-mars accretion disk) Mars Express flybys of Phobos Surface composition: phyllosilicates (Giuranna et al. 2011) => body may have formed in-situ (close to Mars orbit) Low density => high porosity (Andert, Rosenblatt et al., 2010) => consistent with gravitational-aggregates

2. A scenario of in-situ formation of Phobos and Deimos from an accretion disk Physical modelling never been done. What modern theories of accretion can tell us about that scenario? Adapted from Craddock R.A., Icarus (2011) Giant impact on Proto-Mars Accretion disk Mass: ~10 18-10 19 kg Gravitational instabilities formed moonlets Moonlets fall back onto Mars elongated craters Two moonlets survived 4 Gy later

3. Purpose of this work: Origin of Phobos & Deimos consistent with theories of accretion? Modern theories of accretion : 2 main regimes of accretion. (a) The strong tide regime => close to the planet ~ Roche Limit Background : Accretion of Saturn s small moons (Charnoz et al., 2010) Accretion of the Earth s moon (Canup 2004, Kokubo et al., 2000) (b) The weak tide regime => farther from the planet Background : Accretion of big satellites of Jupiter & Saturn Accretion of planetary embryos (Lissauer 1987, Kokubo 2007, and works from G. Wetherill, S. Weidenschilling, R. Greenberg) We explore the consequences of these regimes of accretion for the in-situ formation of the Martian moons.

1. Accretion in a strong tide regime: basic physics of the disk Viscosity of planetary disk Radial spreading Gravity instabilities develop beyond the Roche limit. Formation of small aggregates Saturn Ring small aggregates Gravitationally stable (no accretion) Gravitationally unstable (accretion) Roche Limit This model explains the origin of Saturn s small Moons (Charnoz et al., 2010)

2. Accretion in a strong tide regime: Formation of gravitational instabilities Accretion at the Roche Limit occurs on a short timescale ~ Orbital period Example : moon formation at Saturn s Roche Limit (S. Charnoz, 2008) 3D local particle simulation (500 m x 500 m) (Charnoz S., 2008)

Accretion of disk particule in the area of gravitational influence (or Hill Sphere) of the instability: Creation of elongated moons With shape ~ Hill Sphere shape (Triaxial ellipsoid with axes ratio : 3:2:2)

3. Morphological properties of moons accreted at the Roche Limit Growth of the gravitational aggregate is limited by its Hill Sphere A gravitational-aggregate fills ENTIRELY its Hill sphere The HILL SPHERE : Tri-axial ellipsoid of gravitational influence R h =a( Ms/3Mp) 1/3 Volume : ~1.59 R 3 h Axes ratio 3:2:2 Density : ~Mp/(1.59 a 3 ) «zone of accretion» of a gravitational-aggregate It works for Saturn s small moons. Planet L1 R h L2 Saturn s moon: Pandora Does it work for Phobos & Deimos too? Simulated Grav. Aggregate (S. Charnoz, 2008)

4. Morphological properties of moon accretion at the Roche Limit: Shape of gravitational aggregates In high-tide accretion regime a gravitational-aggregate fills ENTIRELY its Hill sphere Shape of Hill Sphere Shape of Satellite COMPARISON WITH PHOBOS & DEIMOS AXES RATIO: Phobos Triaxial ellipsoid: 13.0 km x 11.39 km x 9.07 km Axes ratio: 2.86:2.5:2 (~3:2:2) Deimos Triaxial ellipsoid: 7.5 km x 6.1 km x 5.2 km Axes ratio: 2.88:2.34:2 (~ 3:2:2) Credit ESA Credit NASA Axes ratio 3:2:2 roughly respected

5. Morphological properties of accretion at the Roche Limit: Density of gravitational aggregates In a high-tide accretion regime a gravitational aggregate fills ENTIRELY its Hill sphere => Density of Hill Sphere Density of Satellite ρ cccc. M p 1,59 a 3 ρ crit Phobos Deimos Comparison with Phobos/Deimos density: Density of the Martian moons are compatible with the expected critical density at Mars Roche limit! (=2.5 Mars radii)

6. Putting all things together in a (simple) large scale numerical simulation: Hybrid 1D simulation Moonlet Disk / satellite grav. coupling et DISK Hydro simulation for disk evolution Planet s tides Disk s torque Tidal torque from planet Disk s viscous evolution: Satellite s orbital evolution (distance to Mars - semi-major axis): Viscous torque Satellite torque Tidal dissipation in Mars

7. Results of numerical simulations with a disk of ~ 100 Phobos mass: Initial mass of the disk = 10 18 kg (Craddock, 2011) The Roche limit (~2.5 Mars radii)

7. Results of numerical simulations with a disk of ~ 100 Phobos mass: Viscous spreading of the disk makes it crossing the roche limit Moonlets form at the Roche limit with a relatively low mass ( 10 11 kg ) The Roche limit (~2.5 Mars radii)

7. Results of numerical simulations with a disk of ~ 100 Phobos mass: As viscous spreading continues several tens of moonlets are formed after about 10 Ma Moonlets can reach a mass up to to Deimos mass ( 10 15 kg ). Disk gravitational torque dominates the orbital evolution. The Roche limit (~2.5 Mars radii)

7. Results of numerical simulations with a disk of ~ 100 Phobos mass: As the disk loses more and more mass, it is pushed below the Roche limit, stopping the accretion. Moonlet orbits cannot reach Deimos orbit beyond Mars synchronous limit (20000 km) The Roche limit (~2.5 Mars radii)

7. Results of numerical simulations with a disk of ~ 100 Phobos mass: After 100 Ma, the disk has lost most of its mass through its inner edge. The evolution of moonlet orbit is now dominated by tidal decay. Moonlets recede back to Mars. The Roche limit (~2.5 Mars radii)

7. Results of numerical simulations with a disk of ~ 100 Phobos mass: The disk is pushed inward by the moonlets receding back to Mars. Moonlets accrete together, reaching the mass of Phobos ( 10 16 kg ) The Roche limit (~2.5 Mars radii)

7. Results of numerical simulations with a disk of ~ 100 Phobos mass: In less than 1 Gyr, the disk disappeared and all the moonlets have fallen back to Mars. Inconsistent with 4 Gy old Martian moon system The Roche limit (~2.5 Mars radii)

Main conclusion about the strong tide regime of accretion GOOD: Moonlets with the shape & density of Phobos & Deimos can be formed in a Martian gravitationally unstable accretion disk (strong-tide regime of accretion) consistent with Craddock (2011) BAD: This moonlet system is inconsistent with a 4 Gy old Martian satellite system and with Deimos location (> synchronous orbit) inconsistent with Craddock (2011) A less massive disk would last longer but would form less massive moonlets and could not still form a Deimos at its current location. Needs to explore the weak tide regime of accretion (more consistent with Deimos location, )

1. Weak tide regime (far from the planet): ~planet like accretion in a disk The Hill sphere is much larger than the body size. Accretion is driven by two-bodies encounter. Hypothesis : Planet Accretion disk Disk extends to the synchronous orbit (~6 Mars radii). Roche Limit Synchronous orbit Disk NOT gravitationally unstable ( low dense and hot) Accretion disk surface density profile: σ r = σ 0 r q with -5 < q < -0.5 (inspired from p.p disks, simulation of moon formation)

2. Weak tide regime (far from the planet): The Isolation Mass The mass of accreted bodies is limited by the amount of material in their feeding region (Hill Sphere). Maximum growth mass = ISOLATION MASS «Mi» (Lissauer, 1987): Mi=(16πr 2 σ) 3/2 / (3 M p ) 1/2 r = distance to Mars, Mp = Mars mass σ = local disk surface density (kg/m2) Hill sphere Disk material passing Through the Hill Sphere Accreting embryo If Deimos formed near its current distance as a «satellite embryo», then we can derive the surface density of the disk @ Deimos location needed to reach the isolation mass.

3. Weak tide regime : Comparison with Deimos mass Disk surface density @ Deimos location Density of 80 Kg/m2 at 6 Mars radii is compatible with a disk s mass of: 1.2 10 18 Kg (with q=-3) Density~ 80 Kg/m2 3.7 10 18 Kg (with q=-4) Deimos mass Or with a disk of 10 18 Kg extending from 1 Mars Radius to: 70 Mars radii (with q=-1.5) 40 Mars radii (with q=-1) Deimos mass is compatible with the expected accretion disk s surface density at Deimos orbit for a disk s mass of ~ 10 18 kg (Craddock, 2011). Deimos may be a satellite embryo too. However, the disk is required to extend beyond the synchronous orbit.

3. Weak tide regime : Comparison with Phobos mass Phobos mass Isolation mass profile derived from disk s surface density profile (different q values) Each profile provides a mass equal to Deimos mass at 6 Mars radii Isolation mass can reach Phobos mass A Phobos mass embryo can also be formed in the same disk as for Deimos. This embryo is formed closer to Mars (< 4 Mars radii). Thus, expected to rapidly fall back to Mars due to tidal decay of its orbit. It requires that a Phobos mass embryo be formed closer to synchronous orbit.

SUMMARY Phobos/Deimos formation in an accretion disk seems possible. In a strong tide regime: Consistent with shape/density of the moons Inconsistent with a 4 Gy old Martian satellite system with Deimos location (> Synchronous orbit) In a weak tide regime: Consistent with Deimos mass and location. Problems raised: Phobos mass body at its current location? It may require specific properties of the disk (spreading farther from the planet, low density, ) Further investigations Numerical simulations of accretion in a disk extending primarily below the synchronous orbit.

BACKUP SLIDES

4. Low-tide regime (far from the planet): Number of moons formed After the formation of embryos Embryos tend to appear on orbits separated by 5-10 x the Hill Sphere radius. A population of ~ 50-100 embryos may appear between ~Mars Roche limit and Deimos orbit Most of them may fall onto the planet (orbital tidal decay) Consistent with Craddock (2011) Thommes & Duncan 2007 Questions: Is Phobos the last representent of the falling population? Is Deimos the single representent of the population > Rsyncronous?

3. Weak tide regime : Number of satellite embryos vs distance to Mars q=-5 q=-4 q=-3 q=-2 q=-1 q=-0.5 The number of satellite embryo expected at distances close to the synchronous limit (between 5.5 and 6 Mars radii) is around 7! As the mass of these embryos is close to Deimos mass, and as Deimos mass is 7 times Phobos mass, then : Can Phobos be formed by accretion of embryos near the synchronous limit?

3. Weak tide regime : Number of satellite embryos vs Mars elongated craters The number of satellite embryo is ranging from 50 to 110 depending on the disk surface density profile (q value). This number is just lower than the estimated elongated craters (102 to 174), which could have been fiormed from decaying moonlets.

Acknowledgements This work was financially supported by the Belgian PRODEX program managed by the European Space Agency in collaboration with the Belgian Federal Science Policy Office.