Hamiltonian flows, cotangent lifts, and momentum maps

Similar documents
LECTURE 8: THE MOMENT MAP

A MARSDEN WEINSTEIN REDUCTION THEOREM FOR PRESYMPLECTIC MANIFOLDS

Exercises in Geometry II University of Bonn, Summer semester 2015 Professor: Prof. Christian Blohmann Assistant: Saskia Voss Sheet 1

GEOMETRIC QUANTIZATION

EXERCISES IN POISSON GEOMETRY

Topics in Representation Theory: Lie Groups, Lie Algebras and the Exponential Map

Symplectic and Poisson Manifolds

SYMPLECTIC MANIFOLDS, GEOMETRIC QUANTIZATION, AND UNITARY REPRESENTATIONS OF LIE GROUPS. 1. Introduction

Lecture 5 - Lie Algebra Cohomology II

Hamiltonian Systems of Negative Curvature are Hyperbolic

A little taste of symplectic geometry

BACKGROUND IN SYMPLECTIC GEOMETRY

Poisson Structures. concerning their singularities

SYMPLECTIC GEOMETRY: LECTURE 5

Lecture 4 - Lie Algebra Cohomology I

Symplectic Geometry versus Riemannian Geometry

LECTURE 14: LIE GROUP ACTIONS

Lie algebra cohomology

9. The Lie group Lie algebra correspondence

The Atiyah bundle and connections on a principal bundle

BRST 2006 (jmf) 7. g X (M) X ξ X. X η = [ξ X,η]. (X θ)(η) := X θ(η) θ(x η) = ξ X θ(η) θ([ξ X,η]).

About Lie Groups. timothy e. goldberg. October 6, Lie Groups Beginning Details The Exponential Map and Useful Curves...

Chap. 1. Some Differential Geometric Tools

Geometric Quantization

Geometry of the momentum map

PREQUANTIZATION OF SYMPLECTIC SUPERMANIFOLDS

Reduction of Symplectic Lie Algebroids by a Lie Subalgebroid and a Symmetry Lie Group

ON NEARLY SEMIFREE CIRCLE ACTIONS

Vector fields Lecture 2

LIE ALGEBROIDS AND POISSON GEOMETRY, OLIVETTI SEMINAR NOTES

Symplectic geometry and Calogero-Moser. system,

with a given direct sum decomposition into even and odd pieces, and a map which is bilinear, satisfies the associative law for multiplication, and

Vortex Equations on Riemannian Surfaces

Stratified Symplectic Spaces and Reduction

Nicholas Proudfoot Department of Mathematics, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403

Lecture I: Constrained Hamiltonian systems

An Invitation to Geometric Quantization

The Based Loop Group of SU(2) Lisa Jeffrey. Department of Mathematics University of Toronto. Joint work with Megumi Harada and Paul Selick

The Kepler problem from a differential geometry point of view

Seminar Geometrical aspects of theoretical mechanics

These notes are incomplete they will be updated regularly.

MANIN PAIRS AND MOMENT MAPS

Dierential geometry for Physicists

The Geometry of Euler s equation. Introduction

(g 1, g 2 ) g 1 g 2. i : G G

Comparison of the Weyl integration formula and the equivariant localization formula for a maximal torus of Sp(1)

Math 550 / David Dumas / Fall Problems

COMPUTING THE POISSON COHOMOLOGY OF A B-POISSON MANIFOLD

The Toda Lattice. Chris Elliott. April 9 th, 2014

HONGYU HE. p = mẋ; q = x. be the Hamiltonian. It represents the energy function. Then H q = kq,

Complex line bundles. Chapter Connections of line bundle. Consider a complex line bundle L M. For any integer k N, let

DIRAC COTANGENT BUNDLE REDUCTION HIROAKI YOSHIMURA JERROLD E. MARSDEN. (Communicated by Juan-Pablo Ortega)

LECTURE 3 MATH 261A. Office hours are now settled to be after class on Thursdays from 12 : 30 2 in Evans 815, or still by appointment.

Reminder on basic differential geometry

SEMISIMPLE LIE GROUPS

CALCULUS ON MANIFOLDS

JACOBI STRUCTURES AND DIFFERENTIAL FORMS ON CONTACT QUOTIENTS

Math 868 Final Exam. Part 1. Complete 5 of the following 7 sentences to make a precise definition (5 points each). Y (φ t ) Y lim

An Introduction to Symplectic Geometry

Master Algèbre géométrie et théorie des nombres Final exam of differential geometry Lecture notes allowed

Many of the exercises are taken from the books referred at the end of the document.

THE GUTZWILLER TRACE FORMULA TORONTO 1/14 1/17, 2008

On algebraic index theorems. Ryszard Nest. Introduction. The index theorem. Deformation quantization and Gelfand Fuks. Lie algebra theorem

Poisson Manifolds Bihamiltonian Manifolds Bihamiltonian systems as Integrable systems Bihamiltonian structure as tool to find solutions

fy (X(g)) Y (f)x(g) gy (X(f)) Y (g)x(f)) = fx(y (g)) + gx(y (f)) fy (X(g)) gy (X(f))

COTANGENT MODELS FOR INTEGRABLE SYSTEMS

Spin(10,1)-metrics with a parallel null spinor and maximal holonomy

Lecture III: Neighbourhoods

A FUNDAMENTAL THEOREM OF INVARIANT METRICS ON A HOMOGENEOUS SPACE. 1. Introduction

Reduction of Homogeneous Riemannian structures

Comparison for infinitesimal automorphisms. of parabolic geometries

0.1 Diffeomorphisms. 0.2 The differential

INTRODUCTION TO ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY

Let V, W be two finite-dimensional vector spaces over R. We are going to define a new vector space V W with two properties:

Lectures on Lie groups and geometry

Left invariant geometry of Lie groups by Patrick Eberlein August Table of Contents

LECTURE 4: SYMPLECTIC GROUP ACTIONS

THE HODGE DECOMPOSITION

Twisted Poisson manifolds and their almost symplectically complete isotropic realizations

Differential Geometry qualifying exam 562 January 2019 Show all your work for full credit

Examples of Singular Reduction

12 Geometric quantization

INTRODUCTION TO POISSON GEOMETRY LECTURE NOTES, WINTER 2017

A LITTLE TASTE OF SYMPLECTIC GEOMETRY: THE SCHUR-HORN THEOREM CONTENTS

Smooth Dynamics 2. Problem Set Nr. 1. Instructor: Submitted by: Prof. Wilkinson Clark Butler. University of Chicago Winter 2013

Eva Miranda. UPC-Barcelona and BGSMath. XXV International Fall Workshop on Geometry and Physics Madrid

LECTURE 25-26: CARTAN S THEOREM OF MAXIMAL TORI. 1. Maximal Tori

LECTURE 11: SYMPLECTIC TORIC MANIFOLDS. Contents 1. Symplectic toric manifolds 1 2. Delzant s theorem 4 3. Symplectic cut 8

Notes on quotients and group actions

From Poisson to Quantum Geometry

Solutions of M3-4A16 Assessed Problems # 3 [#1] Exercises in exterior calculus operations

Contact and Symplectic Geometry of Monge-Ampère Equations: Introduction and Examples

Lecture Notes a posteriori for Math 201

Patrick Iglesias-Zemmour

Notes on the Riemannian Geometry of Lie Groups

Hamiltonian Toric Manifolds

Lie algebra cohomology

A Crash Course of Floer Homology for Lagrangian Intersections

Sheaves of Lie Algebras of Vector Fields

M4P52 Manifolds, 2016 Problem Sheet 1

Transcription:

Hamiltonian flows, cotangent lifts, and momentum maps Jordan Bell jordan.bell@gmail.com Department of Mathematics, University of Toronto April 3, 2014 1 Symplectic manifolds Let (M, ω) and (N, η) be symplectic manifolds. A symplectomorphism F : M N is a diffeomorphism such that ω = F η. Recall that for x M and v 1, v 2 T x M, (F η) x (v 1, v 2 ) = η F (x) ((T x F )v 1, (T x F )v 2 ); T x F : T x M T F (x) N. (A tangent vector at x M is pushed forward to a tangent vector at F (x) N, while a differential 2-form on N is pulled back to a differential 2-form on M.) In these notes the only symplectomorphisms in which we are interested are those from a symplectic manifold to itself. 1 2 Symplectic gradient If (M, ω) is a symplectic manifold and H C (M), using the nondegeneracy of the symplectic form ω one can prove that there is a unique vector field X H Γ (M) such that, for all x M, v T x M, This can also be written as where ω x (X H (x), v) = (dh) x (v). i XH ω = dh, (i X ω)(y ) = (X ω)(y ) = ω(x, Y ). We call X H the symplectic gradient of H. If X Γ (M) and X = X H for some H C (M), we say that X is a Hamiltonian vector field. 2 1 I am interested in flows on a phase space and this phase space is a symplectic manifold. For some motivation for why we want phase space to be a symplectic manifold, read: http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/people/cohn/thoughts/symplectic.html 2 On a Riemannian manifold, a vector field that is the gradient of a smooth function is called a gradient vector field or a conservative vector field. 1

Let s check that X H = H p i H q i q i p i. We have, because dq i q j = δ ij, dp i p j = δ ij, dq i p j = 0 and dp i because dq j dp j = dp j dq j, n ( H i XH ω = dq i dp i H ) p j=1 j q j q j p j ( H = dq i dp i H ) p i q i q i p i H = dp i + H dq i p i q i = dh. q j = 0, and 3 Flows Let M be a smooth manifold. Let D be an open subset of M R, and for each x M suppose that D x = {t R : (x, t) D} is an open interval including 0. A flow on M is a smooth map φ : D M such that if x M then φ 0 (x) = x and such that if x M, s D x, t D φs(x) and s + t D x, then φ t (φ s (x)) = φ s+t (x). For x M, define φ x : D x M by φ x (t) = φ t (x). The infinitesimal generator of a flow φ is the vector field V on M defined for x M by V x = d φ x (t). It is a fact that every vector field on M is the infinitesimal generator of a flow on M, and furthermore that there is a unique flow whose domain is maximal that has that vector field as its infinitesimal generator, and we thus speak of the flow of a vector field. We say that a vector field is complete if it is the infinitesimal generator of a flow whose domain is R M, in other words if it is the infinitesimal generator of a global flow. It is a fact that if V is a vector field on a compact smooth manifold then V is complete. 4 Hamiltonian flows Let (M, ω) be a symplectic manifold. We say that a vector field X on M is symplectic if L X ω = 0, 2

where L X ω is the Lie derivative of ω along the flow of X. A Hamiltonian flow is the flow of a Hamiltonian vector field. 3 If X is a complete symplectic vector field and φ : M R is the flow of X, then for all t R, the map φ t : M M is a symplectomorphism. Let H C (M), and let φ be the flow of the vector field X H. If (x, s) is in the domain of the flow φ, we have d H(φ x (t)) = (d φx (s)h)((φ x ) (s)) dt t=s = (d φx (s)h)(x H (φ x (s))) = ω φx (s)(x H (φ x (s)), X H (φ x (s))) = 0. Thus a Hamiltonian vector field is symplectic: H does not change along the flow of X H. We can also write this as d dt (H φ t) = d dt (φ t H) = φ t (L XH H) = φ t ((i XH ω)(x H )) = φ t (ω(x H, X H )) = φ t (0) = 0. It is a fact that if HdR 1 (M) = {0} (i.e. if α is a 1-form on M and dα = 0 then there is some f C (M) such that α = df) then every symplectic vector field on M is Hamiltonian. In particular, if M is simply connected then HdR 1 (M) = {0}, and hence if M is simply connected then every symplectic vector field on M is Hamiltonian. 5 Poisson bracket For f, g C (M), we define {f, g} C (M) for x M by {f, g}(x) = ω x (X f (x), X g (x)). This is called the Poisson bracket of f and g. We write We have {f, g} = ω(x f, X g ). {f, g} = X f g = (df)x g. We say that f and g Poisson commute if {f, g} = 0. The Poisson bracket of f and g tells us how f changes along the Hamiltonian flow of g. If f and g Poisson commute then f does not change along the flow of X g. 3 cf. gradient flow. 3

We have {f, g} = ω(x f, X g ) ( f = (dq i dp i ) f ) n ( g g ) p j=1 j q j q j p j p k q k q k p k k=1 ( f = dp i + f ) n ( g dq i g ) p i q i p k q k q k p k k=1 = f g + f g. p i q i q i p i If x M and v T x M, then vf is the directional derivative in the direction v. If v = n a i q i + b i p i and f C (M) then vf = a i f q i + b i f p i. If X is a vector field on M then Xf C (M), defined for x M by (Xf)(x) = X x f. If τ is a covariant tensor field and X is a vector field, the Lie derivative of τ along the flow of X is defined as follows: if φ is the flow of X, then (L X τ)(x) = d (φ t τ)(x), and so if τ is a function f C (M), then (L X f)(x) = d (φ t f)(x) = d f(φ t (x)) = X x f = (Xf)(x). Thus if X is a vector field and f C (M), then L X f = Xf. For f, g C (M), X {f,g} ω = d{f, g} = d(x g f) = d(l Xg f) = L Xg (df) = L Xg (X f ω) = (L Xg X f ) ω + X f L Xg ω = [X g, X f ] ω + X f 0 = [X g, X f ] ω = [X f, X g ] ω. 4

Since the symplectic form ω is nondegenerate, if X ω = Y ω then X = Y, so X {f,g} = [X f, X g ]. It follows that C (M) is a Lie algebra using the Poisson bracket as the Lie bracket. The set Γ (M) of vector fields on M are a Lie algebra using the vector field commutator [, ]. The symplectic vector fields are a Lie subalgebra: it is clear that they are a linear subspace of the Lie algebra of vector fields, and one shows that the commutator of two symplectic vector fields is itself a symplectic vector field. One can further show that the set of Hamiltonian vector fields is a Lie subalgebra of the Lie algebra of symplectic vector fields. It is a fact that the vector space quotient of the vector space of symplectic vector fields modulo the vector space of Hamiltonian vector fields is isomorphic to the vector space HdR 1 (M); this is why if H1 dr (M) = {0} (in particular if M is simply connected) then any symplectic vector field on M is Hamiltonian. 6 Tautological 1-form Let Q be a smooth manifold and let π : T Q Q, π(q, p) = q. For x = (q, p) T Q, we have d x π : T x T Q T q Q. Let θ x = (d x π) (p) = p d x π : T x T Q R. Thus θ : T Q T T Q. θ is called the tautological 1-form on T Q. If (Q 1,..., Q n ) are coordinates on an open subset U of Q, Q i : U R, then for each q U we have that d q Q i Tq U = Tq Q, 1 i n, are a basis for Tq Q and q Q i, 1 i n, are a basis for T q Q. For each p Tq Q, p = ( ) q p d q Q i. Q i On T U, define coordinates (q 1,..., q n, p 1,..., p n ) by and q i (q, p) = Q i (q), ( ) q p i (q, p) = p. Q i On T U we can write θ using these coordinates: for x = (q, p) T Q, θ x = p d x π = p i (x)d x q i. 5

Thus, on T U, θ = Let ω = dθ. We have, on T U, ω = d = = = p i dq i. p i dq i (dp i dq i + p i d(dq i )) dp i dq i dq i dp i. T Q is a symplectic manifold with the symplectic form ω. 7 Cotangent lifts Let Q be a smooth manifold and let F : Q Q be a diffeomorphism. Define for x = (q, p) by F : T Q T Q F (q, p) = (F (q), (d F (q) (F 1 )) (p)). We call F : T Q T Q the cotangent lift of F : Q Q. It is a fact that it is a diffeomorphism. It is apparent that the diagram T Q Q π F F T Q Q π commutes. 6

The pull-back of θ by F satisfies, for x = (q, p) T Q and (ζ, η) = F (q, p) T Q, ((F ) θ) x = (d x F ) (θ F (x)) = (d x F ) ((d F (x)π) (η)) = (d x (π F )) (η) = (d x (F π)) (η) = (d x π) ((d π(x) F ) (η)) = (d x π) ((d q F ) (η)) = (d x π) (p) = θ x. Thus (F ) θ = θ, i.e. F pulls back θ to θ. The naturality of the exterior derivative 4 is the statement that if G is a smooth map and η is a differential form then G (dη) = d(g η). Hence, with ω = dθ, (F ) ω = (F ) (dθ) = d((f ) θ) = d(θ) = ω, so F pulls back the symplectic form ω to itself. Thus F : T M T M is a symplectomorphism. Let Diff(Q) be the set of diffeomorphisms Q Q. Diff(Q) is a group. Let G be a group and let τ : G Diff(Q) be a homomorphism. Define τ : G Diff(T Q) by (τ ) g = (τ g ) : T Q T Q. τ : G Diff(T Q) is a homomorphism, and for each g G, (τ ) g : T Q T Q is a symplectomorphism. In words, if a group acts by diffeomorphisms on a smooth manifold, then the cotangent lift of the action is an action by symplectomorphisms on the cotangent bundle. 8 Lie groups Recall that if F : M N then T F : T M T N satisfies, for X Γ (M) and f C (N), 5 ((T F )X)(f) = X(f F ), i.e. for x M and v T x M, ((T x F )v)(f) = v(f F ), the directional derivative of f F C (M) in the direction of the tangent vector v. 4 For each k, Ω k is a contravariant functor, and if f : M N, then the functor Ω k sends f to f : Ω k (N) Ω k (M). d is a natural transformation from the contravariant functor Ω k to the contravariant functor Ω k+1. 5 In words: T F pushes forward a vector field on M to a vector field on N. 7

Let G be a Lie group and for g G define L g : G G by L g h = gh. If X is a vector field on G, we say that X is left-invariant if (T h L g )(X h ) = X gh for all g, h G. That is, X is left-invariant if (T L g )(X) = X for all g G. If X and Y are left-invariant vector fields on G then so is [X, Y ]. This is because, for F : G G, (T F )[X, Y ] = [(T F )X, (T F )Y ]. Thus the set of left-invariant vector fields on G is a Lie subalgebra of the Lie algebra of vector fields on G. Define ɛ : Lie(G) T e G by ɛ(x) = X e, where e G is the identity element. It can be shown that this is a linear isomorphism. Hence, if v T e G then there is a unique left-invariant vector field X on G such that, for all g G, V g = (T e L g )(v). It is a fact that every left-invariant vector field on a Lie group G is complete, i.e. that its flow has domain G R. For X Lie(G), we call the unique integral curve of X that passes through e the one-parameter subgroup generated by X. Thus, for any v T e G there is a unique one-parameter subgroup γ : R G such that γ(0) = e, γ (0) = v. We define exp : Lie(G) G by exp(x) = γ(1), where γ is the one-parameter subgroup generated by X. This is called the exponential map. Thus t exp(tx) is the one-parameter subgroup generated by X. Fact: If (T F )X = Y and X has flow φ and Y has flow η, then η t F = F φ t for all t in the domain of φ. Hence L g φ t = φ t L g. Hence the flow φ of a left-invariant vector field X satisfies g exp(tx) = L g exp(tx) = L g (φ t e) = φ t (L g e) = φ t (g). 8

9 Coadjoint action First we ll define the adjoint action of G on g = T idg G. For g G, define Ψ g : G G by Ψ g (h) = ghg 1 ; Ψ g is an automorphism of Lie groups. Define by Ad g : g g Ad g = T idg Ψ g ; since Ψ g is an automorphism of Lie groups, it follows that Ad g is an automorphism of Lie algebras. We can also write Ad g as The adjoint action of G on g is Ad g (ξ) = d (g exp(tξ)g 1 ). g ξ = Ad g (ξ). For each g G, one proves that there is a unique map Ad g : g g such that for all l g, ξ g, The coadjoint action of G on g is 10 Momentum map (Ad gl)(ξ) = l(ad g (ξ)). g l = Ad g 1(l). Let (M, ω) be a symplectic manifold, let G be a Lie group, and let σ : G Diff(M) be a homomorphism such that for each g in G, σ g is a symplectomorphism. Let g = T idg G, and define ρ : g Γ (M) by ρ(ξ)(x) = d σ exp(tξ) (x) T x M, ξ g, x M; t σ exp(tξ) (x) is R M and at t = 0 the curve passes through x, so indeed ρ(ξ)(x) T x (M). ρ is called the infinitesimal action of g on M. Each element of G acts on M as a symplectomorphism, each element of g acts on M as a vector field. A momentum map for the action of G on (M, ω) is a map µ : M g such that, for x M, v T x M and ξ g, ((T x µ)v)ξ = ω x (ρ(ξ)(x), v), (1) where T x µ : T x M T µ(x) g = g, 9

and such that if g G and x M then µ(σ g (x)) = g µ(x), (2) where g µ(x) is the coadjoint action of G on g, defined in section 9; we say that µ is equivariant with respect to the coadjoint action of G on g. 11 Angular momentum Let G = SO(3) = {A R 3 3 : A T A = I, det(a) = 1}. The Lie algebra of SO(3) is g = so(3) = {a R 3 3 : a + a T = 0}. Let Q = R 3, and define τ : G Diff(Q) by τ g (q) = gq. Let θ be the tautological 1-form on T Q and let ω = dθ. (T Q, ω) is a symplectic manifold and τ : G Diff(T Q) is a homomorphism such that for each g G, (τ ) g is a symplectomorphism. For g G, (q, p) T Q, Hence for ξ g and (q, p) T Q, (τ ) g (q, p) = (τ g ) (q, p) = (τ g q, (d τgq(τ 1 g )) p) = (τ g q, (d τgq(τ g 1)) p) = (τ g q, p (d τgqτ g 1)) = (τ g q, p τ g 1) = (gq, pg 1 ) = (gq, pg T ). ρ(ξ)(q, p) = d (τ ) exp(tξ) (q, p) = d (exp(tξ)q, p exp(tξ T )) = (ξq, pξ T ) = (ξq, pξ). Define V : g R 3 by V 0 ξ 3 ξ 2 ξ 3 0 ξ 1 = ξ 1 ξ 2. ξ 2 ξ 1 0 One checks that ξq = V (ξ) q and pξ = p T V (ξ). ξ 3 10

For (q, p) T Q, (v, w) T (p,q) T Q, and ξ g, we have ω (q,p) (ρ(ξ)(q, p), (v, w)) = ω (q,p) ((ξq, pξ), (v, w)) 3 = dq j dp j ((ξq, pξ), (v, w)) = = j=1 3 ((ξq) j dp j + (pξ) j dq j ) (v, w) j=1 3 w j (ξq) j + v j (pξ) j j=1 = w (V (ξ) q) + v (p T V (ξ)). Define µ : T Q g by µ(q, p)(ξ) = (q p T ) V (ξ). I claim that µ satisfies (1) and (2). We have just calculated the right-hand side of (1), so it remains to calculate the left-hand side. I find the left-hand side unwieldly to calculate in a clean and precise way, so I will merely claim that it is equal to the right-hand side. I have convinced myself that it is true by symbol pushing. For g G and ξ g, Ad g ξ = gξg 1, and hence, for (q, p) T Q, On the other hand, (g µ(q, p))ξ = ( Ad g 1µ(q, p)) ξ = µ(q, p)(ad g 1ξ) = µ(q, p)(g 1 ξg) = (q p T ) V (g 1 ξg). µ((τ ) g (q, p))ξ = µ(gq, pg T )ξ = ((gq) (pg T ) T ) V (ξ) = ((gq) (gp T )) V (ξ) = (g(q p T )) V (ξ) = (q p T ) (g T V (ξ)) = (q p T ) (g 1 V (ξ)). 11