Dually quasi-de Morgan Stone semi-heyting algebras II. Regularity

Similar documents
Dually quasi-de Morgan Stone semi-heyting algebras I. Regularity

Frobenius numbers of generalized Fibonacci semigroups

Intuitionistic Fuzzy Lattices and Intuitionistic Fuzzy Boolean Algebras

Boolean Algebra. Boolean Algebras

Semigroup of generalized inverses of matrices

Zero-Sum Magic Graphs and Their Null Sets

arxiv: v1 [math.ra] 1 Nov 2014

THE QUADRATIC RECIPROCITY LAW OF DUKE-HOPKINS. Circa 1870, G. Zolotarev observed that the Legendre symbol ( a p

ABSTRACT: This paper is a study on algebraic structure of Pre A* - algebra and defines the relation R on an. and prove that the relations

Here we study square linear systems and properties of their coefficient matrices as they relate to the solution set of the linear system.

Boolean Algebra. Boolean Algebra

a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a In this section, we introduce a general formula for computing determinants.

ASYMPTOTIC BEHAVIOR OF INTERMEDIATE POINTS IN CERTAIN MEAN VALUE THEOREMS. II

Calculus of variations with fractional derivatives and fractional integrals

p-adic Egyptian Fractions

Chapter 3. Vector Spaces

A Note on Heredity for Terraced Matrices 1

IST 4 Information and Logic

ad = cb (1) cf = ed (2) adf = cbf (3) cf b = edb (4)

Advanced Calculus: MATH 410 Notes on Integrals and Integrability Professor David Levermore 17 October 2004

Absolute values of real numbers. Rational Numbers vs Real Numbers. 1. Definition. Absolute value α of a real

42 RICHARD M. LOW AND SIN-MIN LEE grphs nd Z k mgic grphs were investigted in [4,7,8,1]. The construction of mgic grphs ws studied by Sun nd Lee [18].

Numerical Linear Algebra Assignment 008

ARITHMETIC OPERATIONS. The real numbers have the following properties: a b c ab ac

Linearly Similar Polynomials

COMPUTER SCIENCE TRIPOS

20 MATHEMATICS POLYNOMIALS

S. S. Dragomir. 2, we have the inequality. b a

Coalgebra, Lecture 15: Equations for Deterministic Automata

Farey Fractions. Rickard Fernström. U.U.D.M. Project Report 2017:24. Department of Mathematics Uppsala University

Torsion in Groups of Integral Triangles

Results on Planar Near Rings

AQA Further Pure 1. Complex Numbers. Section 1: Introduction to Complex Numbers. The number system

USA Mathematical Talent Search Round 1 Solutions Year 21 Academic Year

Rectangular group congruences on an epigroup

Toroidalization of Locally Toroidal Morphisms from N-folds to Surfaces

Good Review book ( ) ( ) ( )

Reasoning and programming. Lecture 5: Invariants and Logic. Boolean expressions. Reasoning. Examples

AN INEQUALITY OF OSTROWSKI TYPE AND ITS APPLICATIONS FOR SIMPSON S RULE AND SPECIAL MEANS. I. Fedotov and S. S. Dragomir

International Jour. of Diff. Eq. and Appl., 3, N1, (2001),

Bases for Vector Spaces

Introduction To Matrices MCV 4UI Assignment #1

S. S. Dragomir. 1. Introduction. In [1], Guessab and Schmeisser have proved among others, the following companion of Ostrowski s inequality:

REGULARITY OF NONLOCAL MINIMAL CONES IN DIMENSION 2

Jim Lambers MAT 169 Fall Semester Lecture 4 Notes

The Algebra (al-jabr) of Matrices

Self-similarity and symmetries of Pascal s triangles and simplices mod p

ON THE FIXED POINTS OF AN AFFINE TRANSFORMATION: AN ELEMENTARY VIEW

Boolean algebra.

Journal of Inequalities in Pure and Applied Mathematics

Expected Value of Function of Uncertain Variables

ON A CERTAIN PRODUCT OF BANACH ALGEBRAS AND SOME OF ITS PROPERTIES

Well Centered Spherical Quadrangles

Chapter 2. Determinants

Math 554 Integration

Convex Sets and Functions

THE EXISTENCE-UNIQUENESS THEOREM FOR FIRST-ORDER DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS.

Name of the Student:

13.3 CLASSICAL STRAIGHTEDGE AND COMPASS CONSTRUCTIONS

A basic logarithmic inequality, and the logarithmic mean

Quadratic Forms. Quadratic Forms

KNOWLEDGE-BASED AGENTS INFERENCE

MathCity.org Merging man and maths

Duality # Second iteration for HW problem. Recall our LP example problem we have been working on, in equality form, is given below.

Some estimates on the Hermite-Hadamard inequality through quasi-convex functions

AQA Further Pure 2. Hyperbolic Functions. Section 2: The inverse hyperbolic functions

Handout: Natural deduction for first order logic

Lesson 1: Quadratic Equations

Infinite Geometric Series

(e) if x = y + z and a divides any two of the integers x, y, or z, then a divides the remaining integer

ODE: Existence and Uniqueness of a Solution

Chapter 4 Contravariance, Covariance, and Spacetime Diagrams

Lecture 08: Feb. 08, 2019

The First Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. If f(x) is continuous on [a, b] and F (x) is any antiderivative. f(x) dx = F (b) F (a).

Advanced Calculus: MATH 410 Uniform Convergence of Functions Professor David Levermore 11 December 2015

Simple Gamma Rings With Involutions.

AUTOMATA AND LANGUAGES. Definition 1.5: Finite Automaton

KRASNOSEL SKII TYPE FIXED POINT THEOREM FOR NONLINEAR EXPANSION

A new algorithm for generating Pythagorean triples 1

Arithmetic & Algebra. NCTM National Conference, 2017

Before we can begin Ch. 3 on Radicals, we need to be familiar with perfect squares, cubes, etc. Try and do as many as you can without a calculator!!!

Riemann is the Mann! (But Lebesgue may besgue to differ.)

N 0 completions on partial matrices

The presentation of a new type of quantum calculus

CS 330 Formal Methods and Models

g i fφdx dx = x i i=1 is a Hilbert space. We shall, henceforth, abuse notation and write g i f(x) = f

Path product and inverse M-matrices

CS 330 Formal Methods and Models

On the Continuous Dependence of Solutions of Boundary Value Problems for Delay Differential Equations

Diophantine Steiner Triples and Pythagorean-Type Triangles

Entropy and Ergodic Theory Notes 10: Large Deviations I

Control with binary code. William Sandqvist

set is not closed under matrix [ multiplication, ] and does not form a group.

CS 301. Lecture 04 Regular Expressions. Stephen Checkoway. January 29, 2018

A REVIEW OF CALCULUS CONCEPTS FOR JDEP 384H. Thomas Shores Department of Mathematics University of Nebraska Spring 2007

Journal of Inequalities in Pure and Applied Mathematics

On a Conjecture of Farhi

On the degree of regularity of generalized van der Waerden triples

1.9 C 2 inner variations

THE NUMBER CONCEPT IN GREEK MATHEMATICS SPRING 2009

Transcription:

Volume 2, Number, July 204, 65-82 ISSN Print: 2345-5853 Online: 2345-586 Dully qusi-de Morgn Stone semi-heyting lgebrs II. Regulrity Hnmntgoud P. Snkppnvr Abstrct. This pper is the second of two prt series. In this Prt, we prove, using the description of simples obtined in Prt I, tht the vriety RDQDStSH of regulr dully qusi-de Morgn Stone semi-heyting lgebrs of level is the join of the vriety generted by the twenty 3-element RDQDStSH -chins nd the vriety of dully qusi-de Morgn Boolen semi-heyting lgebrs the ltter is known to be generted by the expnsions of the three 4-element Boolen semi-heyting lgebrs. As consequences of our min theorem, we present (equtionl) xiomtiztions for severl subvrieties of RDQDStSH. The pper concludes with some open problems for further investigtion. Introduction This pper is the second of two prt series. In this Prt, we prove, using the description of simples obtined in Prt I, tht the vriety RDQDStSH of regulr dully qusi-de Morgn Stone semi-heyting lgebrs of level is the join of the vriety generted by the twenty 3-element RDQDStSH - chins nd the vriety of dully qusi-de Morgn Boolen semi-heyting Keywords: Regulr dully qusi-de Morgn semi-heyting lgebr of level, dully pseudocomplemented semi-heyting lgebr, De Morgn semi-heyting lgebr, strongly blended dully qusi-de Morgn Stone semi-heyting lgebr, discrimintor vriety, simple, directly indecomposble, subdirectly irreducible, equtionl bse. Mthemtics Subject Clssifiction [200]: 03G25, 06D20, 06D5, 08B26, 08B5. Dedicted to the Memory of My Sister Kshww. 65

66 Hnmntgoud P. Snkppnvr lgebrs the ltter is known to be generted by the expnsions of the three 4-element Boolen semi-heyting lgebrs. Furthermore, s consequences of this theorem, we present (equtionl) xiomtiztions for severl subvrieties of RDQDStSH. The pper concludes with some open problems for further investigtion. 2 Preliminries In this section we recll nottions nd results from Prt I in order to mke this pper self-contined. An lgebr L = L,,,,, 0, is dully qusi-de Morgn semi- Heyting lgebr (DQDSH-lgebr, for short) if L,,,, 0, is semi-heyting lgebr, nd L stisfies: () 0 nd 0 (b) (x y) x y (c) (x y) x y (d) x x. Let L be DQDSH-lgebr. Then L is of level (DQDSH -lgebr) if L stisfies: (L) x x (x x ) (Level ). L is dully pseudocomplemented semi-heyting lgebr (DPCSH-lgebr) if L stisfies: (e) x x. L is De Morgn semi-heyting lgebr (DMSH-lgebr) if L stisfies: (DM) x x. L is regulr if L stisfies: (M) x x + y y, where x + := x. L is dully qusi-de Morgn Stone semi-heyting lgebr (DQDStSH-lgebr) if L stisfies:

Dully qusi-de Morgn semi-heyting lgebrs II 67 (St) x x, where x := x 0. L is dully qusi-de Morgn Boolen semi-heyting lgebr (DQDBSH-lgebr) if L stisfies: (Bo) x x where x := x 0. L is strongly blended dully qusi-de Morgn semi-heyting lgebr (SBDQDSH) if L stisfies: (SB) (x y ) x y (Strongly Blended -De Morgn lw). The vriety of DQDSH -lgebrs is denoted by DQDSH, nd similr nottion pplies to other vrieties. DQDStSH denotes the subvriety of level of DQDSH defined by (St), nd DQDBSH denotes the one defined by (Bo), while RDQDSH denotes the vriety of regulr DQDSH -lgebrs nd RSBDQDSH denotes tht of regulr, strongly blended DQDSH -lgebrs, nd so on. If the underlying semi-heyting lgebr is Heyting lgebr, then we replce the prt SH by H in the nmes of the vrieties tht we consider in this sequel. Let 2 e nd 2 e be the expnsions of the semi-heyting lgebrs 2 nd 2 (shown in Figure ) by dding the unry opertion such tht 0 =, = 0. Let L dp i, i =,..., 0, denote the expnsion of the semi-heyting lgebr L i (shown in Figure ) by dding the unry opertion such tht 0 =, = 0, nd =. Let i, i =,..., 0, denote the expnsion of L i by dding the unry opertion such tht 0 =, = 0, nd =. We Let C dp 0 i =,..., 0} nd C dm 0 := {Ldm := {Ldp i : i : i =,..., 0}. We lso let C 20 := C dm 0 Cdp 0. Ech of the three 4-element lgebrs D, D 2 nd D 3 hs its lttice reduct s the Boolen lttice with the universe {0,, b, }, b being the complement of, hs the opertion s defined in Figure, nd hs the unry opertion defined s follows: =, b = b, 0 =, = 0. It ws shown in [0] tht V(D, D 2, D 3 ) = DQDBSH.

68 Hnmntgoud P. Snkppnvr 2 : 0 0 0 2 : 0 0 0 0 0 0 L : 0 0 0 0 L 2 : 0 0 0 0 0 0 L 3 : 0 0 0 0 L 4 : 0 0 0 0 0 0 L 5 : 0 0 0 0 L 6 : 0 0 0 0 0 0 L 7 : 0 0 0 0 L 8 : 0 0 0 0 0 0 L 9 : 0 0 0 0 0 0 L 0 : 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Dully qusi-de Morgn semi-heyting lgebrs II 69 0 b D : 0 0 b 0 b D 2 : b 0 b b 0 0 b 0 0 b b b b D 3 : 0 b 0 0 b b 0 b Figure The following two results proved in Prt I. Theorem 2.. Let L RDQDStSH with L 2. Then the following re equivlent: () L is simple (2) L is subdirectly irreducible (3) For every x L, if x, then x x = 0 (4) L {2 e, 2 e } C 20 {D, D 2, D 3 }, up to isomorphism. Theorem 2.2. DQDStSH = SBDQDStSH. 3 Min result nd consequences Let V(K) denote the vriety generted by the clss K of lgebrs. Recll V(C 20 ) is the vriety of DQDSH-lgebrs genrerted by the twenty 3- element lgebrs mentioned erlier. Let D denote the vriety generted by the three 4-element DQDSH-lgebrs whose semi-heyting reducts re D,

70 Hnmntgoud P. Snkppnvr D 2 nd D 3 given in Figure. The vriety V(C 20 ) ws xiomtized in [0] nd lso it ws shown there tht D = DQDBSH. We re now redy to give the min result of this pper. Theorem 3.. We hve RDQDStSH = V((C 20 ) {D, D2, D3}) = V(C 20 ) D = RSBDQDStSH = RDmsStSH. Proof. Since 2 e nd 2 e re sublgebrs of some of the other simple lgebrs listed in Theorem 2., the first eqution is immedite from Theorem 2., using well known results from universl lgebr (see [2]). The second eqution follows from the first, using the definition of the join of two vrieties, nd the third eqution is immedite from Theorem 2.2. To prove the lst eqution, it suffices to verify tht ll 25 simple lgebrs in RDQDStSH stisfy the identity: (x y) x y. If we restrict the underlying semi-heyting lgebrs to Heyting lgebrs, Theorem 3. reduces to the following Corollry 3.2. Let RDQDStH denote the subvriety of RDQDStSH defined by: (x y) x. Then RDQDStH = V({, L dp, D 2}) = V( ) V(L dp ) V(D 2) = RSBDQDStH = RDmsStH. Proof. Verify tht 2 e,, Ldp, D 2 stisfy the identity: (x y) x, while the remining simple lgebrs mong the twenty five listed in Theorem 2. do not. Also, observe tht 2 e is sublgebr of (or L dp ). Then the corollry follows from Theorem 3.. The following corollries, which give (equtionl) bses to severl subvrieties of RDQDStSH, cn lso be similrly deduced from Theorem 2. nd Theorem 3..

Dully qusi-de Morgn semi-heyting lgebrs II 7 In these corollries the reder should interpret defined by s defined, modulo RDQDStSH, by. Corollry 3.3. RDQDStH is lso defined by the linerity identity: (x y) (y x). It is lso defined by: x (x y) = (x y) x. Corollry 3.4. We hve () RDMStSH = V(C dm 0 ) D (b) RDPCStSH = V(C dp 0 ). (c) RDMStH = V({, D 2}) = V( ) V(D 2) (d) RDPCStH = V(L dp ). Corollry 3.5. Let RDQDcmStSH be the subvriety of RDQDStSH defined by the commuttive lw: x y y x. Then () RDQDcmStSH = V({ 0, Ldp 0, D }) = V( 0 ) V(Ldp 0 ) V(D ) (b) RDMcmStSH = V({ 0, D }) (c) RDPCcmStSH = V(L dp 0 ) (d) RDMcmStSH RDPCcmStSH = V( 2 e ). Corollry 3.6. The vriety V({, Ldp identity: (x y) (0 y) (x y)., Ldm 3, Ldp 3, D 2}) is defined by the The vriety generted by D ws xiomtized in [0]. Here re two more bses for it. Corollry 3.7. V(D ) is defined by

72 Hnmntgoud P. Snkppnvr x (y z) z (x y). It is lso defined by (x y) (u w) (x u) (y w) (Medil Lw). Corollry 3.8. The vriety V({, Ldp, Ldm 2, Ldp 2, D 2}) is defined by: y x y. It is lso defined by: [(x y) y] (x y) x y. It is lso defined by x (y z) (x y) (x z) (Left distributive lw). Corollry 3.9. The vriety V({, Ldp, Ldm 2, Ldp 2, Ldm 5, Ldp 5, Ldm 6, Ldp 6, D 2}) is defined by: [x (y x)] x x. Corollry 3.0. V({L dp, Ldp 2, Ldp () [x (y x)] x x (2) x x. 5, Ldp 6 }) is defined by: Corollry 3.. V({, Ldm 2, Ldm 5, Ldm 6, D 2}) is defined by: () [x (y x)] x x (2) x x. Corollry 3.2. The vriety V({, Ldp, Ldm 2, Ldp 2, Ldm 3, Ldp D 2, D 3 }) is defined by the identity: (0 ) + (0 ) 0. Corollry 3.3. The vriety V({L dp identities: 3, Ldm 4, Ldp 4, Ldm 5, Ldm 6, Ldm 7, Ldm 8,, Ldp 2, Ldp 3, Ldp 4 }) is defined by the

Dully qusi-de Morgn semi-heyting lgebrs II 73 () (0 ) + (0 ) 0 (2) x x. Corollry 3.4. The vriety V({, Ldm 2, Ldm 3, Ldm 4, Ldm 5, Ldm 6, Ldm 7, Ldm 8, D 2, D 3 }) is defined by the identities: () (0 ) + (0 ) 0 (2) x x. Corollry 3.5. The vriety V({ 5, Ldm 6, Ldm 7, Ldm 8, D 3}) is defined by the identity: (0 ) + (0 ) (0 ). V(D 3 ) ws xiomtized in [0]. Here is nother bse for it. Corollry 3.6. V(D 3 ) is defined by the identities: () (0 ) + (0 ) (0 ) (2) x x. Corollry 3.7. The vriety generted by the lgebrs, Ldm 2, Ldm 3, Ldm 4, D 2, D 3 is defined by the identities: () (0 ) + (0 ) (0 ) (2) (0 ) + (0 ) (0 ) (3) x x. Corollry 3.8. The vriety generted by the lgebrs 5, Ldp 5, Ldm 6, Ldp 6, Ldm 7, Ldp 7, Ldm 8, Ldp 8, Ldp 9, Ldm D, D 3 is defined by the identity: (0 ) + (0 ) (0 ). 9, Ldp 0, Ldm 0, Corollry 3.9. The vriety generted by the lgebrs L dp 5, Ldp 6, Ldp 7, Ldp 8, Ldp 9, Ldp 0 is defined by the identities:

74 Hnmntgoud P. Snkppnvr () (0 ) + (0 ) (0 ) (2) x x. Corollry 3.20. The vriety generted by the lgebrs 5, Ldm 6, Ldm 7, Ldm 8, Ldm 9, Ldm 0, D, D 3 is defined by the identities: () (0 ) + (0 ) (0 ) (2) x x. Corollry 3.2. The vriety generted by the lgebrs 5, Ldm 6, Ldm 7, Ldm 8, D 3 is defined by the identities: () (0 ) + (0 ) (0 ) (2) (0 ) + (0 ) (0 ). It is lso defined by (0 ) 0. Corollry 3.22. The vriety generted by the lgebrs D, D 3 is defined by the identities: () (0 ) + (0 ) (0 ) (2) x x. Corollry 3.23. The vriety generted by the lgebrs, Ldp, Ldm 2, Ldp 2, Ldm 3, Ldp 3, Ldm 4, Ldp 4, Ldp 5, Ldp 6, Ldp 7, Ldp 8, 9, Ldp 9, Ldm 0, Ldp 0, D, D 2 is defined by the identity: (0 ) (0 ) 0. Corollry 3.24. The vriety generted by the lgebrs, Ldm 2, Ldm 3, Ldm 4, Ldm 9, Ldm 0, D, D 2 is defined by the identities: () (0 ) (0 ) 0 (2) x x. Corollry 3.25. The vriety generted by the lgebrs D, D 2 is defined by the identities:

Dully qusi-de Morgn semi-heyting lgebrs II 75 () (0 ) (0 ) 0 (2) x x. Corollry 3.26. The vriety generted by the lgebrs, Ldp, Ldm 3, Ldp 3, Ldm 6, Ldp 6, Ldm 8, Ldp 8, D, D 2, D 3 is defined by the identity: x (y (x y)) (0 x) (x y). Corollry 3.27. The vriety generted by the lgebrs 2, Ldp 2, Ldm 5, Ldp 5, D 2 is defined by the identity: x (y x) [(x y) y] x. Corollry 3.28. The vriety generted by the lgebrs 3, Ldp 3, Ldm 4, Ldp 4, D, D 2, D 3 is defined by the identity: x (x y) x (x (y )). Corollry 3.29. The vriety generted by the lgebrs 5, Ldp 6, Ldm 7, Ldp 8, D 3 is defined by the identity: (0 ) (0 ) (0 ). Corollry 3.30. The vriety generted by the lgebrs, Ldp, Ldm 2, Ldp 2, Ldm 3, Ldp 3, Ldm 4, Ldp 4, D 2 is defined by the identity: 0 (FTT identity). Corollry 3.3. The vriety generted by the lgebrs, Ldp, Ldm 3, Ldp 3, Ldm 6, Ldp 6, Ldm 8, Ldp 8, D, D 2, D 3 is defined by the identity: x (y x) (x y) x. Corollry 3.32. The vriety generted by the lgebrs L dp, Ldp 3, Ldp 6, Ldp 8 is defined by the identities: () x (y x) (x y) x (2) x x.

76 Hnmntgoud P. Snkppnvr Corollry 3.33. The vriety generted by the lgebrs, Ldm 3, Ldm 6, Ldm 8, D, D 2, D 3 is defined by the identities: () x (y x) (x y) x (2) x x. Corollry 3.34. The vriety generted by the lgebrs, Ldp, Ldm 2, Ldp 2, Ldm 5, Ldp 5, Ldm 6, Ldp 6, Ldm 9, Ldp 9, D, D 2, D 3 is defined by the identity: x (x y) (x y) y. Corollry 3.35. V({L dp, Ldp 2, Ldp 5, Ldp () x (x y) (x y) y (2) x x. 6, Ldp 9 }) is defined by the identity: Corollry 3.36. The vriety generted by the lgebrs, Ldm 2, Ldm 5, Ldm 6, Ldm 9, D, D 2, D 3 is defined by the identity: () x (x y) (x y) y (2) x x. Corollry 3.37. The vriety generted by the lgebrs 5, Ldp 5, D 2 is defined by the identity: x (0 x) (y ) x [(x ) (x y)]. Corollry 3.38. The vriety generted by the lgebrs 6, Ldp 6, D 2 defined by the identity: x y (x y) x [(x y) ]. Corollry 3.39. The vriety generted by the lgebrs, Ldp, Ldm 7, Ldp 7, D 2 is defined by the identity: x [(0 y) y) x [(x ) y]. Corollry 3.40. The vriety generted by the lgebrs 7, Ldp 7, Ldm 8, Ldp 8, D, D 2, D 3 defined by the identity:

Dully qusi-de Morgn semi-heyting lgebrs II 77 x [x (y (0 y))] x [(x y) y]. Corollry 3.4. The vriety generted by the lgebrs 8, Ldp 8, D, D 2, D 3 defined by the identity: x y [y (y x)] x [x (0 y)]. It is lso defined by the identity: x [y (0 (y x))] x y (y x). Corollry 3.42. The vriety generted by the lgebrs 7, Ldp 7, Ldm 8, Ldp 8, Ldm 9, Ldp 9, Ldm 0, Ldp 0, D, D 2, D 3 is defined by the identity: x (x y) x [(x y) ]. Corollry 3.43. The vriety generted by the lgebrs 2 e, L dp 7, Ldp 8, Ldp 9, Ldp 0 is defined by the identities: () x (x y) x [(x y) ] (2) x x. Corollry 3.44. The vriety generted by the lgebrs 7, Ldm 8, Ldm 9,, Ldm 0, D, D 2, D 3 is defined by the identities: () x (x y) x [(x y) ] (2) x x. Corollry 3.45. The vriety generted by the lgebrs 9, Ldp 9, Ldm 0, Ldp 0, D is defined by the identity: 0 0. (FTF identity) Corollry 3.46. The vriety generted by the lgebrs 0, Ldp 0, D is defined by the identity: x y y x. (commuttive identity) A bse for V(C dp 0 ) ws given in [0]. We give some new ones below.

78 Hnmntgoud P. Snkppnvr Corollry 3.47. The vriety V(C dp 0 ) is defined by : x x 0 (dul Stone identity). It is lso defined by : x x. A bse for V(C 20 ) ws given in [0]. We give new one below. Corollry 3.48. The vriety V(C 20 ) is defined by : x x. A bse for V(2 e, 2 e ) ws given in [0]. We give new one below. Corollry 3.49. The vriety V(2 e, 2 e ) is defined by : x x. Corollry 3.50. The vriety generted by the lgebrs in : i =,..., 8} { i : i =,..., 8} {D 2 } is defined by the identity: {L dp i (x y) (x y ). It is lso defined by (0 ) 0. Corollry 3.5. The vriety generted by the lgebrs in, i =,..., 8}, is defined by the identities: {L dp i () (x y) (x y ) (2) x x 0 (dul Stone identity). Corollry 3.52. The vriety generted by the lgebrs, Ldp, Ldm 2, Ldp 2, D 2 is defined by the identity: x z y (y z) (strong Kleene identity). Corollry 3.53. The vriety generted by, Ldp, Ldm 2, Ldp 2, Ldm 5, Ldp 5, Ldm 6, Ldp 6, D 2 is defined by the identity:

Dully qusi-de Morgn semi-heyting lgebrs II 79 x y (x y) y. Corollry 3.54. The vriety generted by L dp, Ldp 2, Ldp 5, Ldp 6 is defined by the identity: () x y (x y) y (2) x x. Corollry 3.55. The vriety generted by, Ldm 2, Ldm 5, Ldm 6, D 2 is defined by the identity: () x y (x y) y (2) x x. The vriety D = V{D, D 2, D 3 } ws xiomtized in [0]. Here re two more bses for it. Corollry 3.56. The vriety D is defined by the identity: x (y z) (x y) (x z). It is lso defined by the identity: x 2( ) x. We would like to mention here tht in the cse of either of the two bses in the preceding corollry the identities (St) nd (L) re consequences of the rest of the identities nd hence re redundnt. Corollry 3.57. The vriety generted by 2, Ldp 2, D 2 is defined by the identity: (x y) x x. V(D 2 ) ws xiomtized in [0]. Here re some more bses for it. This vriety hs n interesting property in tht is definble in terms of. Corollry 3.58. The vriety generted by D 2 is defined by the identity: x y (x y) y.

80 Hnmntgoud P. Snkppnvr It is lso defined by the identities: () x (y z) (x y) (x z) (2) (x y) x x. It is lso defined by the identity: x (x y) x ((x y) ). Corollry 3.59. The vriety generted by, Ldp, Ldm 2, Ldp 2, Ldm 9, Ldp 9, D, D 2, D 3 is defined by the identity: x (y z) y (x z). Corollry 3.60. The vriety generted by, Ldp, Ldm 2, Ldp 2, Ldm 5, Ldp 5, D 2 is defined by the identity: (x y) z ((y x) z) z. (Prelinerity) We conclude this section by mentioning tht one cn esily write down the bses for intersections of the vrieties mentioned in this section. Similrly, one cn lso esily determine the subvrieties of the vrieties considered in this section, obtined by dding the identity x x, or the identity: x x, to their bses occurring in the preceding corollries. 4 Conclusion nd some open problems It should be pointed out tht, bsed on the results from [0], ll vrieties ppering in Section 3. re discrimntor vrieities. It ws lso shown in [0] tht ll the twenty 3-element lgebrs in RDQDStSH re semipriml (see [2] or [0] for definition). A similr rgument proves tht D nd D 2 re semipriml s well; nd 2 e, 2 e, D3 re, in fct, priml. Thus the vriety RDQDStSH is generted by semipriml lgebrs. We would lso like to note here tht the lgebrs in {L i dm : i = 5,..., 8} {L i dp : i = 5,..., 8} re lso priml. From these observtions nd from the results of [0] we conclude tht the lgebrs in {2 e, 2 e, D3} {L i dm : i = 5,..., 8} {L i dp : i = 5,..., 8} re the only toms in the lttice of subvrieties of the vriety RDQDStSH.

Dully qusi-de Morgn semi-heyting lgebrs II 8 It is our view tht ech of the vrieties mentioned in Section 3 is worthy of further study, both lgebriclly nd logiclly. We conclude this pper with some more open problems for further investigtion. Problem. RDQDStSH. Find equtionl bses for the remining subvrieties of Problem 2. Give n explicit description of simple lgebrs in the vriety of regulr dully Stone semi-heyting lgebrs of level. Problem 3. Axiomtize logiclly ech of the subvrieties of RDQDStSH. (In other words, for ech subvriety V of RDQDStSH find propositionl logic P such tht V is n equivlent lgebric semntics for P.) In prticulr, the following problem is of interest. Problem 4. The 2-element, 3-element, 4-element lgebrs in Figure cn be viewed respectively s 2, 3 nd 4-vlued logicl mtrices. Axiomtize these lgebrs logiclly (with s the only designted truth vlue), using nd s impliction nd negtion respectively. (For the lgebr 2 in Figure, the nswer is, of course, well known: the clssicl propositionl logic.) Problem 5. Investigte the lttice of subvrieties of DPCStSH. Problem 6. Investigte the lttice of subvrieties of DMStSH. Problem 7. Investigte the lttice of subvrieties of the vriety of commuttive DMSH -lgebrs. Problem 8. subvrieties. Find dulity for RDQDStSH nd for ech of its References [] R. Blbes nd PH. Dwinger, Distributive Lttices, Univ. of Missouri Press, Columbi, 974.

82 Hnmntgoud P. Snkppnvr [2] S. Burris nd H.P. Snkppnvr, A Course in Universl Algebr, Springer- Verlg, New York, 98. The free, corrected version (202) is vilble online s PDF file t mth.uwterloo.c/ snburris. [3] B. Jónsson, Algebrs whose congruence lttices re distributive, Mth. Scnd. 2 (967), 0-2. [4] W. McCune, Prover9 nd Mce 4, http://www.cs.unm.edu/mccune/prover9/. [5] H. Rsiow, An Algebric Approch to Non-Clssicl Logics, North Hollnd Publ.Comp., Amsterdm, 974. [6] H.P. Snkppnvr, Heyting lgebrs with dul pseudocomplementtion, Pcific J. Mth. 7 (985), 405-45. [7] H.P. Snkppnvr, Heyting lgebrs with dul lttice endomorphism, Zeitschr. f. mth. Logik und Grundlgen d. Mth. 33 (987), 565 573. [8] H.P. Snkppnvr, Semi-De Morgn lgebrs, J. Symbolic. Logic 52 (987), 72-724. [9] H.P. Snkppnvr, Semi-Heyting lgebrs: An bstrction from Heyting lgebrs, Acts del IX Congreso Dr. A. Monteiro (2007), 33-66. [0] H.P. Snkppnvr, Expnsions of semi-heyting lgebrs. I: Discrimintor vrieties, Studi Logic 98 (-2) (20), 27-8. [] H.P. Snkppnvr, Dully qusi-de Morgn Stone semi-heyting lgebrs I. Regulrity, Cteg. Generl Alg. Struct. Appl. 2() (204), 47-64. Hnmntgoud P. Snkppnvr, Deprtment of Mthemtics, Stte University of New York, New Pltz, NY 256 Emil: snkpph@newpltz.edu