Use and evaluation of low cost sensors for the monitoring of NO 2 and O 3 in ambient air

Similar documents
Protocol of evaluation and calibration of low-cost gas sensors for the monitoring of air pollution. L. Spinelle, M. Aleixandre and M.

Field evaluation of NanoEnvi microsensors for O 3 monitoring. M. Gerboles, I. Fumagalli, F. Lagler and S. Yatkin

Operation and Maintenance of Networking of CAAQM stations at Bangalore and Chennai.

Seasonal prediction of extreme events

Monthly Report: Chevron Richmond Community Air Monitoring Program. Report Number: RCAMP_MO_11 Date: February RCAMP_MO_11 Page 1 of 26

CCA Session in WG Source Apportionment

Station Maintenance and Calibration Report ABRAHAM LINCOLN BIRTHPLACE NATIONAL HISTORIC SITE March 13, 2007

Monthly Report: Chevron Richmond Community Air Monitoring Program. Report Number: RCAMP_MO_5 Date: August RCAMP_MO_5 Page 1 of 26

CERTIFICATE OF ACCREDITATION

MAINTENANCE AND CALIBRATION REPORT NATIONAL PARK SERVICE GASEOUS POLLUTANT MONITORING NETWORK BADLANDS NATIONAL PARK MAY 10, 2006

Quality Assurance of Automated Measuring Systems: practical implementation of pren 14181:2001. Results of field experience at two Italian plants.

APPENDIX 3.6-A Support Information for Newcastle, Wyoming Meteorological Monitoring Site

Standard Practices for Air Speed Calibration Testing

A calibration facility for automatic weather stations

Questions, Myths and Misconceptions about Using Photoionization Detectors

Review of Anemometer Calibration Standards

An account of our efforts towards air quality monitoring in epitaxial graphene on SiC

WEATHER STATION FOR SOLAR FARM MONITORING

Assessing The Thermal Performance of Building Enclosure Materials Using A Medium-Size Hot Box Chamber Summer Meeting Torkan Fazli

Concept Learning through General-to-Specific Ordering

Weather Stations. Evaluation copy. 9. Post live weather data on the school s web site for students, faculty and community.

Maximum Performance From Dry-Well Thermometer Calibrators. Mark Finch Product Manager EMEA Fluke Calibration

Performance of Radar Wind Profilers, Radiosondes, and Surface Flux Stations at the Southern Great Plains (SGP) Cloud and Radiation Testbed (CART) Site

Evaluation of Vaisala HMP45D Humidity Probes

TÜV RHEINLAND ENERGY GMBH ADDENDUM

Legacy Calibration of the Automatic Weather Station Model 2 of the United States Antarctic Program

THE EFFECT OF PHOTOCATALYTIC BUILDING MATERIALS IN URBAN DEPOLLUTION

INSTALLATION OF PORTABLE O3 MONITORING STATION NATIONAL PARK SERVICE AMBIENT AIR QUALITY AND METEOROLOGY MONITORING NETWORK

473 Dew Point Hygrometer

DeFelsko PosiTector Dew Point Meter with Anemometer (DPMA)

AMBIENT AIR MONITORING MONTHLY DATA REPORT

M. Mielke et al. C5816

WP3: In-situ chemical, physical and optical properties of aerosols. WP4: Trace gases networking: Volatile organic carbon and nitrogen oxides

PTA-427 BAROMETRIC PRESSURE TRANSDUCER OPERATOR S MANUAL

New Methodologies for Instrument Set point and Loop Uncertainty Calculations

UV3000. Accurate, precise, and portable ambient gas point analyzer

ASSESSMENT OF DIFFERENT WATER STRESS INDICATORS BASED ON EUMETSAT LSA SAF PRODUCTS FOR DROUGHT MONITORING IN EUROPE

GRUAN Station Report for Ny-Ålesund

Non-Acoustical Inputs

NO X AT CAPE VERDE (CVO) Chris Reed, Katie Read, Luis Mendes, James Lee, Lucy Carpenter

ISEmax CAM40/CAS40. Technical Information

Monthly probabilistic drought forecasting using the ECMWF Ensemble system

EAS 535 Laboratory Exercise Weather Station Setup and Verification

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2012

e-newsletter n 6 August 31 st, 2018 New calibration facility developed at PTB for relative humidity, associated to dtdlas transfer standard

_02 / 2 February 2015

WeatherHawk Weather Station Protocol

Specifications for a Reference Radiosonde for the GCOS Reference. Upper-Air Network (GRUAN)

Twice-Annual Station Maintenance and Calibration Report BIG BEND NATIONAL PARK February 1, 2012

Mobile Meteorological Measurements during the 2015 Toronto Games

Components of uncertainty in measurements by means of AWS

Calibration of Paroscientific Model 205 Pressure Sensor for use at Heard Island.

Calibration of Temperature Block Calibrators

THM80X Series Feature Application. Temperature & Humidity / Flow Measuring Specialist

CALIOPE EU: Air Quality

CONTENT 2. ORGANIZATION 3. SERVICES. instruments. (3)Activities of RIC Tsukuba

A sensitivity and uncertainty analysis. Ministry of the Walloon Region Agricultural Research Centre

Applications of Meteorological Tower Data at Kennedy Space Center

Conceptual Model for Ozone in the Austin-Round Rock Metropolitan Statistical Area

1 INTRODUCTION 2 DESCRIPTION OF THE MODELS. In 1989, two models were able to make smog forecasts; the MPA-model and

2 April 2004 Copenhagen, Denmark

VOC measurements in ambient air using Selected Ion Flow Tube Mass Spectrometry-automation and calibration considerations

PORTABLE MULTIFUCTION DATA-LOGGER INSTRUMENT DO 9847

The Challenge of. Guy Brasseur

Uncertainty in Ammonia Flux Measurement Systems

MASTERING VOC DETECTION FOR BETTER INDOOR AIR QUALITY

Comparison of V and 10 V DC Voltage References

Real Time On-Site Odor and VOC Emission Measurements Using a znose

International Pyrheliometer Comparison IPC-XII

5. AN INTRODUCTION TO BUILDING PHYSICS

Using sensor data and inversion techniques to systematically reduce dispersion model error

Regional Production, Quarterly report on the daily analyses and forecasts activities, and verification of the CHIMERE performances

473 Dew Point Hygrometer

WMO number: Internal Station number: same as WMO number, historic AWOS documents refer to the station as A19. Current Station Location

MICHELL TECHNOLOGIES FOR MOISTURE. Calibration. General Principles & Theory, Equipment Considerations

HCL Series Miniature compensated low pressure sensors

Practical Use of Metal Oxide Semiconductor Gas Sensors for Measuring Nitrogen Dioxide and Ozone in Urban Environments

AMBIENT AIR MONITORING MONTHLY DATA REPORT

McArthur River Mining Borroloola Caravan and Devils Spring Stations

HD32.2 WBGT Index HD32.3 WBGT-PMV. [ GB ] - WBGT index. - PMV index and PPD

The AWS based operational urban network in Milano: achievements and open questions.

Uncertainties associated with the use of a sound level meter

Comparative analysis of data collected by installed automated meteorological stations and manual data in Central Asia.

Overview of the Thunderbird Micronet

Application and verification of the ECMWF products Report 2007

PURCHASE OF LAB EQUIPMENTS FOR CHEMISTRY [Kindly enclose a signed copy of this document along with the TENDER Document]

Meteorological QA/QC

Alphasense Ltd. Compliance Statements and Certificates. Contents. The Restriction of the Use of Certain Hazardous Substances (RoHS)...

Overview. TC Thermometry Graham Machin. Introduction to TC-T Annual meeting Selected comparisons TC-T training for future thermal metrologists

Electronic Station Data Definitions

Verification of the meteorological observations on the EPN stations

Collective Awareness Platform for Tropospheric Ozone Pollution

PMF2000 Series DESCRIPTION FEATURES APPLICATIONS MAXIMUM RATINGS MASS AIR FLOW SENSOR

Regional Production, Quarterly report on the daily analyses and forecasts activities, and verification of the EURAD-IM performances

STATUS OF THE WIGOS DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS

Comparison between air temperature measured inside a conventional large wood shelter and by means of present day screens

HERU Modbus. Reference Modbus addresses for HERU (Gen 3)

Automated Stability Testing Delivering Rapid Product Development

Regional Production, Quarterly report on the daily analyses and forecasts activities, and verification of the MATCH performances

Instrument types and performance characteristics

Transcription:

Use and evaluation of low cost sensors for the monitoring of NO 2 and O 3 in ambient air Michel Gerboles, Pascual Ballesta and Laurent Spinelle European Commission, Joint Research Centre, I 21026 Ispra (VA)

Fixed/indicative measurements: definition fixed measurements measurements taken at fixed sites, to determine the levels in accordance with the relevant Data Quality Objectives (DQO); indicative measurements measurements which meet DQOs that are less strict than those required for fixed measurements; They are use to monitor Limit Values during an Averaging Time (for ozone 60 ppb mean of 8 hourly values) European DIRECTIVE 2008/50/EC on ambient air quality and cleaner air for Europe, art. 2 2

Data Quality Objectives (DQO) of the European Air Quality Directive O 3 SO 2, NO 2 /NO/ NOx, CO Benzene DQO: Uncertainty for indicative measurements DQO: Uncertainty for reference measurements 30 % 25 % 30 % 15 % 15 % 25 % 3

Indicative methods: what for? Fixed measurements are mandatory in zones and agglomerations where the upper assessment thresholds are exceeded, otherwise indicative methods can be used. The use of indicative measurements allows for reduction of 50 % of the required minimum number of fixed sampling points. European DIRECTIVE 2008/50/EC on ambient air quality and cleaner air for Europe, art. 6 4

Field of application: limit value, averaging time and Data Quality Objective Type of station/zone: e.g. O 3 rural background air composition (test gas and interferents) 1 Response time 2 Pre-calibration 3.1 Short term drift 3.2 Long term drift Averaging time Calibration function to eliminate bias at central point Max time between tests, limit of detection, repeatability Correction of drift - periodicity of re-calibration 4 Interference testing: gas compounds, meteo (T, RH,P, wind...), hysteresis... laboratory design of experiments (significant parameters ) No Lab. Model equation lab. uncertainty U(lab) 5.1 Lab. experiments U(lab) < DQO? Yes 5.2 Field tests - U(field) No Lab. Model correct in field? 6 Additional information: cold, warm and hot start... No U(Field) <U(lab) Yes Yes The sensor is accepted as an indicative method No U(field)<DQO 5

Tests Comments on test gas level or interferent Temperature, ºC Relative humidity, % 1 Response Time 0 to 80 % of full scale (FS) - 80% of FS to 0 2 Pre-calibration At least 3 levels of test gas (limit value LV) 3-1 Repeatability 0 and 80 % of FS, 3 repetitions every averaging time 3-2 Short term drift 3-3 Long term drift 24 September 2013 0, 50 % and 80 % of LV, 3 repetitions per day for 3 consecutive days 0, 50 % and 80 % of LV, repeated every 2 weeks during 3 months 4-1 Air matrix Zero air, laboratory air and ambient air at 0 and LV 4-2 Gas interference Test selected interferences at 0 and mean level in ambient air, test gas at 0 and LV of test gas 4-3 Temperature At LV From mean-10 C to mean+10 C by steps of 5 C 4-4 Humidity At LV 4-5 Hysteresis Increasing-decreasing-increasing cycles of the test gas levels used for pre-calibration From mean-20% to mean +20% by steps of 10% 4-6 Pressure overpressure 10 mbar and under pressure 5 mbar 4-7 Power supply effect At LV test under 210, 220 and 230 V 4-8 Wind velocity from 1 to 5 m/s (needed?) 5-1 Lab experiments (model) 5-2 Field experiments 6 Cold start, warm start, hot start 0, LV, AT for each significant parameter: temperature and humidity (3 levels) and interference (2 levels) At an automatic station equipped with reference method of measurements -10 C, mean, mean -10 C, if found significant -20%, mean, mean + 20 %, if found significant At LV 6

On-site measurements 24 September 2013 7

On-site measurements Inlet sampling line Sensors Meteorological mast

Manufacturer Model Type OUnitec 3 Sensors s.r.l IT O 3 Sens 3000 Resistive Ingenieros Assessores SP NanoENvi mote and MicroSAD datalogger, with Oz-47 sensor Resistive αsense - UK O 3 sensors (O3B4) 4 electrodes Citytech G Sensoric 4-20 ma Transmitter Board with O3E1 sensor 3 electrodes Citytech G Sensoric 4-20 ma Transmitter Board with O3E1F sensor 3 electrodes CairPol F CairClip O3 3 electrodes e2v CH MiCS-2610 sensor and OMC2 datalogger, Resistive e2v CH MiCS Oz-47 sensor and OMC3 datalogger Resistive IMN2P FR Prototype WO3 sensor with MICS-EK1 Sensor Evaluation Kit Resistive FIS - J SP-61 sensor and evaluation test board Resistive

NO 2 Sensors Manufacturer Unitec s.r.l IT Sens 3000 Ingenieros Assessores SP αsense UK Citytech G Model NanoENvi mote and MicroSAD datalogger, unidentified sensor probably e2v-mics sensor NO 2 sensors (B4 series) Sensoric 4-20 ma Transmitter Board with 3E50 sensor Citytech UK A3OZ EnviroceL (NO2 and O3) MIKES FI InRim IT Prototype graphene sensors Prototype graphene sensors

1 - Response time Rise Time (n=3) Fall Time (n=3) Average Time Response time per type Chamber UV analyser (substracted) 3 5 4 Unitec, Sens3000 (n =2) 47 ' 75 ' 61 ' e2v, MICS-2610 (n =2) 1 ' 12 ' 6 ' FIS, SP-61(n =2) 57 ' 54 ' 56 ' Ingenieros Assessores, NanoEnvi (n =1) 8 ' 14 ' 11 ' 31 ' e2v, OMC3 (n=2) - - - e2v, OMC2 (n=2) - - - e2v, MICS_Oz47 (n =7) 19' 27' 23' IMN2P, WO3 (n =2) 8' 16' 12' 12 ' Sensoric, O3E1F + Test Panel (n =1) 1' 2' 2' Sensoric, O3E1 + 4-20mA Board (n =2) 4 ' 5 ' 4 ' αsense B4 (n =2) 1 ' 2 ' 2 ' 3 ' CairclipO3NO2 (n=1) 3 ' 3 ' 3 ' Sensors Average response Time 15' 21 ' 18 '

Tests Comments on test gas level or interferent Temperature, ºC Rela6ve humidity, % 1 Response Time 0 to 80 % of full scale (FS) - 80% of FS to 0 2 Pre-calibration At least 3 levels of test gas (limit value LV) 3-1 Repeatability 0 and 80 % of FS, 3 repetitions every averaging time 3-2 3-3 Short term drift Long term drift 0, 50 % and 80 % of LV, 3 repetitions per day for 3 consecutive days 0, 50 % and 80 % of LV, repeated every 2 weeks during 3 months 4-1 Air matrix Zero air, laboratory air and ambient air at 0 and LV 4-2 Gas interference Test selected interferences at 0 and mean level in ambient air, test gas at 0 and LV of test gas 4-3 Temperature At LV From mean-10 C to mean+10 C by steps of 5 C 4-4 Humidity At LV 4-5 Hysteresis Increasing-decreasing-increasing cycles of the test gas levels used for pre-calibration From mean-20% to mean +20% by steps of 10% 4-6 Pressure overpressure 10 mbar and under pressure 5 mbar 4-7 Power supply effect At LV test under 210, 220 and 230 V 4-8 Wind velocity from 1 to 5 m/s (needed?) 0, LV, AT for each significant parameter: temperature -10 C, mean, mean -20%, mean, mean + 20 5-1 Lab experiments and humidity (3 levels) and interference (2 levels) -10 C, if found significant %, if found significant At an automatic station equipped with reference 5-2 Field experiments method of measurements 3 months Cold start, warm 6 At LV start, hot start

2 - Pre-calibration

Tests Comments on test gas level or interferents Temperature, ºC Relative humidity, % 1 Response Time 0 to 80 % of full scale (FS) - 80% of FS to 0 2 Pre-calibration At least 3 levels of test gas (limit value LV) 3-1 Repeatability 3-2 Short term drift 3-3 Long term drift 0 and 80 % of FS, 3 repetitions every averaging time 0, 50 % and 80 % of LV, 3 repetitions per day for 3 consecutive days 0, 50 % and 80 % of LV, repeated every 2 weeks during 3 months 4-1 Air matrix Zero air, laboratory air and ambient air at 0 and LV 4-2 Gas interference Test selected interferences at 0 and mean level in ambient air, test gas at 0 and LV of test gas 4-3 Temperature At LV From mean-10 C to mean+10 C by steps of 5 C 4-4 Humidity At LV 4-5 Hysteresis Increasing-decreasing-increasing cycles of the test gas levels used for pre-calibration From mean-20% to mean +20% by steps of 10% 4-6 Pressure overpressure 10 mbar and under pressure 5 mbar 4-7 Power supply effect At LV test under 210, 220 and 230 V 4-8 Wind velocity from 1 to 5 m/s (needed?) Lab experiments 0, LV, AT for each significant parameter: temperature -10 C, mean, mean -20%, mean, mean + 20 5-1 (model) and humidity (3 levels) and interference (2 levels) -10 C, if found significant %, if found significant At an automatic station equipped with reference 5-2 Field experiments method of measurements Cold start, warm 6 At LV

3.1 - Repeatability (hourly values) O3 ppb CairClipO3 ppb (n=9) 0 NA (n=13) 91.7 93 ± 0.5

Tests Comments on test gas level or interferents Temperature, ºC Relative humidity, % 1 Response Time 0 to 80 % of full scale (FS) - 80% of FS to 0 2 Pre-calibration At least 3 levels of test gas (limit value LV) 3-1 Repeatability 0 and 90 % of LV, 3 repetitions every averaging time 3-2 Short term drift 3-3 Long term drift 0, 50 % and 80 % of FS, 3 repetitions per day for 3 consecutive days 0, 50 % and 80 % of LV, repeated every 2 weeks during 3 months 4-1 Air matrix Zero air, laboratory air and ambient air at 0 and LV 4-2 Gas interference Test selected interferences at 0 and mean level in ambient air, test gas at 0 and LV of test gas 4-3 Temperature At LV From mean-10 C to mean+10 C by steps of 5 C 4-4 Humidity At LV 4-5 Hysteresis Increasing-decreasing-increasing cycles of the test gas levels used for pre-calibration From mean-20% to mean +20% by steps of 10% 4-6 Pressure overpressure 10 mbar and under pressure 5 mbar 4-7 Power supply effect At LV test under 210, 220 and 230 V 4-8 Wind velocity from 1 to 5 m/s (needed?) Lab experiments 0, LV, AT for each significant parameter: temperature -10 C, mean, mean -20%, mean, mean + 20 5-1 (model) and humidity (3 levels) and interference (2 levels) -10 C, if found significant %, if found significant At an automatic station equipped with reference 5-2 Field experiments method of measurements Cold start, warm 6 At LV start, hot start

3.2 - Short term stability 1 day drift at 0, 60 and 90 ppb Diff. at 0 ppb (n~19) Diff. at 60 ppb % (n~8) Diff. at 90 ppb (n~6) Res 1 (n =2) 5.4 3.1 1.9 % 2.7 2 % Res 2 (n =2) Res 3 (n =2) 13 15 9.5 % 15 8.9 % Res 4 (n =2) 1.8 2.3 3.6 % 2.1 2.6 % Res 5 (n=2) Res 6 (n=2) Res 7 (n =1) 1.9 2.9 2.5 % 2.8 2.0 % Res 8 (n =2) 1.0 2.0 2.4 % 4.6 4.4 % Chem 1 (n =1) 1.3 1.2 1.8 % 1.2 1.1 % Chem 2 (n =2) Malfunc@on Malfunc@on Malfunc@on Chem 3 (n = 2) 4.4 1.4 0.9 % 0.9 0.5 % Chem 4 (n=1) 3.4 ± 3.4 1.7 ± 0.9 1 ± 0.7

Tests Comments on test gas level or interferents Temperature, ºC Relative humidity, % 1 Response Time 0 to 80 % of full scale (FS) - 80% of FS to 0 2 Pre-calibration At least 3 levels of test gas (limit value LV) 3-1 Repeatability 0 and 90 % of LV, 3 repetitions every averaging time 3-2 Short term drift 3-3 Long term drift 0, 50 % and 80 % of LV, 3 repetitions per day for 3 consecutive days 0, 50 % and 80 % of FS, repeated every 2 weeks during 3 months 4-1 Air matrix Zero air, laboratory air and ambient air at 0 and LV 4-2 Gas interference Test selected interferences at 0 and mean level in ambient air, test gas at 0 and LV of test gas 4-3 Temperature At LV From mean-10 C to mean+10 C by steps of 5 C 4-4 Humidity At LV 4-5 Hysteresis Increasing-decreasing-increasing cycles of the test gas levels used for pre-calibration From mean-20% to mean +20% by steps of 10% 4-6 Pressure overpressure 10 mbar and under pressure 5 mbar 4-7 Power supply effect At LV test under 210, 220 and 230 V 4-8 Wind velocity from 1 to 5 m/s (needed?) Lab experiments 0, LV, AT for each significant parameter: temperature -10 C, mean, mean -20%, mean, mean + 20 5-1 (model) and humidity (3 levels) and interference (2 levels) -10 C, if found significant %, if found significant At an automatic station equipped with reference 5-2 Field experiments method of measurements Cold start, warm 6 At LV start, hot start

a) 0.44 0.42 0.40 3.3 - Long term stability, 150 days Scatterplot of V011_21 (V) Ozone, UV Photometry = 0 nmol/mol: y = 0.2911-6.2576E-5*x; r 2 = 0.1367 Ozone, UV Photometry = 60 nmol/mol: y = 0.3596-2.1113E-5*x; r 2 = 0.2444 Ozone, UV Photometry = 90 nmol/mol: y = 0.3949+9.9389E-6*x; r 2 = 0.0017 0.38 0.36 V011_21 0.34 0.32 0.30 0.28 0.26 0.24 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 Number of Day

Tests Comments on test gas level or interferents Temperature, ºC Relative humidity, % 1 Response Time 0 to 80 % of full scale (FS) - 80% of FS to 0 2 Pre-calibration At least 3 levels of test gas (limit value LV) 3-1 Repeatability 0 and 90 % of LV, 3 repetitions every averaging time 3-2 Short term drift 3-3 Long term drift 0, 50 % and 80 % of LV, 3 repetitions per day for 3 consecutive days 0, 50 % and 80 % of FS, repeated every 2 weeks during 3 months 4-1 Air matrix Zero air, laboratory air and ambient air at 0 and LV 4-2 Gas interference Test selected interferences at 0 and mean level in ambient air, test gas at 0 and LV of test gas 4-3 Temperature At LV From mean-10 C to mean+10 C by steps of 5 C 4-4 Humidity At LV 4-5 Hysteresis Increasing-decreasing-increasing cycles of the test gas levels used for pre-calibration From mean-20% to mean +20% by steps of 10% 4-6 Pressure overpressure 10 mbar and under pressure 5 mbar 4-7 Power supply effect At LV test under 210, 220 and 230 V 4-8 Wind velocity from 1 to 5 m/s (needed?) Lab experiments 0, LV, AT for each significant parameter: temperature -10 C, mean, mean -20%, mean, mean + 20 5-1 (model) and humidity (3 levels) and interference (2 levels) -10 C, if found significant %, if found significant At an automatic station equipped with reference 5-2 Field experiments method of measurements Cold start, warm 6 At LV

4.2 - Gaseous interference O 3 sensors Sensors/ NO 2 NO CO CO 2 NH 3 Interference, ppb 100 100 8000 Purified air ± 85 O3, ppb 60 0 60 60 60 RH (%) T (ºC) 60 % 22 ºC 60 % 22 ºC 60 % 22 ºC 60 % 22 ºC 60 % 22 ºC Res 1 (n =2) 14.1 % - 5.3 % 9.8 % -6.2 % 6.0 % Res 2 (n =2) -3.3 % - 3.6 % -0.1 % -0.3 % Res 3 (n =2) 14.5 % -10 % 13.4 % 5.0 % 18 % Res 4 (n =2) 12.6 % -1.6 % -8.9 % 1.0 % 3.5 % Res 5 (n=2) - - - - - Res 6 (n=2) - - - - - Res 7 (n =1) - - - - - Res 8 (n =2) 1.2 % -0.8 % 0.1 % -0.2 % -1.9 % Chem 1 (n =1) 89.3 % 1.3 % -0.9 % 0.2 % 1.2 % Chem 2 (n =2) - - - - - Chem 3 (n = 2) 33.7 % -7.7 % -1.2 % -0.4 % 0.1 % Chem 4 (n=1) 107.7 % -1.5 % -2.4 % 0.4 % 2.3 %

Tests Comments on test gas level or interferents Temperature, ºC Relative humidity, % 1 Response Time 0 to 80 % of full scale (FS) - 80% of FS to 0 2 Pre-calibration At least 3 levels of test gas (limit value LV) 3-1 Repeatability 0 and 80 % of FS, 3 repetitions every averaging time 3-2 Short term drift 3-3 Long term drift 0, 50 % and 80 % of LV, 3 repetitions per day for 3 consecutive days 0, 50 % and 80 % of LV, repeated every 2 weeks during 3 months 4-1 Air matrix Zero air, laboratory air and ambient air at 0 and LV 4-2 Gas interference Test selected interferences at 0 and mean level in ambient air, test gas at 0 and LV of test gas 4-3 Temperature At LV From mean-10 C to mean +10 C by steps of 5 C 4-4 Humidity At LV From mean-20% to mean +20% by steps of 10% 4-5 Hysteresis Increasing-decreasing-increasing cycles of the test gas levels used for pre-calibration 4-6 Pressure overpressure 10 mbar and under pressure 5 mbar 4-7 Power supply effect At LV test under 210, 220 and 230 V 4-8 Wind velocity from 1 to 5 m/s (needed?) Lab experiments 0, LV, AT for each significant parameter: temperature 5-1 (model) and humidity (3 levels) and interference (2 levels) At an automatic station equipped with reference 5-2 Field experiments -10 C, mean, mean -10 C, if found significant -20%, mean, mean + 20 %, if found significant

4.3 Temperature

Tests Comments on test gas level or interferents Temperature, ºC Relative humidity, % 1 Response Time 0 to 80 % of full scale (FS) - 80% of FS to 0 2 Pre-calibration At least 3 levels of test gas (limit value LV) 3-1 Repeatability 0 and 80 % of FS, 3 repetitions every averaging time 3-2 Short term drift 3-3 Long term drift 0, 50 % and 80 % of LV, 3 repetitions per day for 3 consecutive days 0, 50 % and 80 % of LV, repeated every 2 weeks during 3 months 4-1 Air matrix Zero air, laboratory air and ambient air at 0 and LV 4-2 Gas interference Test selected interferences at 0 and mean level in ambient air, test gas at 0 and LV of test gas 4-3 Temperature At LV From mean-10 C to mean+10 C by steps of 5 C 4-4 Humidity At LV From mean-20% to mean +20% by steps of 10% 4-5 Hysteresis Increasing-decreasing-increasing cycles of the levels used for pre-calibration 4-6 Pressure overpressure 10 mbar and under pressure 5 mbar 4-7 Power supply effect At LV test under 210, 220 and 230 V 4-8 Wind velocity from 1 to 5 m/s (needed?) Lab experiments 0, LV, AT for each significant parameter: temperature 5-1 (model) and humidity (3 levels) and interference (2 levels) At an automatic station equipped with reference 5-2 Field experiments method of measurements -10 C, mean, mean -10 C, if found significant -20%, mean, mean + 20 %, if found significant

4.5 - Hysteresis

Tests Comments on test gas level or interferents Temperature, ºC Relative humidity, % 1 Response Time 0 to 80 % of full scale (FS) - 80% of FS to 0 2 Pre-calibration At least 3 levels of test gas (limit value LV) 3-1 Repeatability 0 and 80 % of FS, 3 repetitions every averaging time 3-2 Short term drift 3-3 Long term drift 0, 50 % and 80 % of LV, 3 repetitions per day for 3 consecutive days 0, 50 % and 80 % of LV, repeated every 2 weeks during 3 months 4-1 Air matrix Zero air, laboratory air and ambient air at 0 and LV 4-2 Gas interference Test selected interferences at 0 and mean level in ambient air, test gas at 0 and LV of test gas 4-3 Temperature At LV From mean-10 C to mean+10 C by steps of 5 C 4-4 Humidity At LV 4-5 Hysteresis Increasing-decreasing-increasing cycles of the test gas levels used for pre-calibration From mean-20% to mean +20% by steps of 10% 4-6 Pressure overpressure 10 mbar and under pressure 5 mbar 4-7 Power supply effect At LV test under 210, 220 and 230 V 4-8 Wind velocity from 1 to 5 m/s (needed?) 5-1 Lab experiments 5-2 Field experiments Cold start, warm At least 3 gas test levels for each significant parameter: temp. and humidity (3 levels) and interference (2 levels) At an automatic station equipped with reference method of measurements -10 C, mean, mean -20%, mean, mean + -10 C, if found significant 20 %, if found significant

5.1 - Experimental design O 3, ppb NO 2, ppb Temp. Rel. Hum. Total 0 20 40 60 12 40 90 0 22 60 110 100 32 80 6 levels 2 levels 3 levels 3 levels 108 trials

5.1 - Experimental design

Tests Comments on test gas level or interferents Temperature, ºC Relative humidity, % 1 Response Time 0 to 80 % of full scale (FS) - 80% of FS to 0 2 Pre-calibration At least 3 levels of test gas (limit value LV) 3-1 Repeatability 0 and 80 % of FS, 3 repetitions every averaging time 3-2 Short term drift 3-3 Long term drift 0, 50 % and 80 % of LV, 3 repetitions per day for 3 consecutive days 0, 50 % and 80 % of LV, repeated every 2 weeks during 3 months 4-1 Air matrix Zero air, laboratory air and ambient air at 0 and LV 4-2 Gas interference Test selected interferences at 0 and mean level in ambient air, test gas at 0 and LV of test gas 4-3 Temperature At LV From mean-10 C to mean+10 C by steps of 5 C 4-4 Humidity At LV 4-5 Hysteresis Increasing-decreasing-increasing cycles of the test gas levels used for pre-calibration From mean-20% to mean +20% by steps of 10% 4-6 Pressure overpressure 10 mbar and under pressure 5 mbar 4-7 Power supply effect At LV test under 210, 220 and 230 V 4-8 Wind velocity from 1 to 5 m/s (needed?) 5-1 5-2 6 Lab experiments (model) Field experiments Cold start, warm start, hot start 0, LV, AT for each significant parameter: temperature and humidity (3 levels) and interference (2 levels) At an automatic station equipped with reference method of measurements -10 C, mean, mean -10 C, if found significant -20%, mean, mean + 20 %, if found significant At LV

5.2 Field tests, hourly values

5.2 Uncertainty and DQO Ø U = 2 (s² lof + s² bias s r,uv ² ) < DQO = 30 % U, ppb, Hourly values, validation datas 60 ppb 26 % 90 ppb 19 % 120 ppb 17 %