The CMB and Neutrinos

Similar documents
The ultimate measurement of the CMB temperature anisotropy field UNVEILING THE CMB SKY

Weak gravitational lensing of CMB

Gravitational Lensing of the CMB

Secondary Polarization

News from BICEP/Keck Array CMB telescopes

CMB Polarization Experiments: Status and Prospects. Kuo Assistant Professor of Physics Stanford University, SLAC

The Silk Damping Tail of the CMB l. Wayne Hu Oxford, December 2002

The cosmic background radiation II: The WMAP results. Alexander Schmah

Absolute Neutrino Mass from Cosmology. Manoj Kaplinghat UC Davis

CMB & Light Degrees of Freedom

COSMIC MICROWAVE BACKGROUND ANISOTROPIES

The South Pole Telescope. Bradford Benson (University of Chicago)

CMB Polarization and Cosmology

Joel Meyers Canadian Institute for Theoretical Astrophysics

Cosmic Microwave Background Polarization. Gil Holder

Constraints on Neutrino Physics from Cosmology

What I heard about Planck Eiichiro Komatsu (MPA) December 9, 2014 December 22, 2014

CMB beyond a single power spectrum: Non-Gaussianity and frequency dependence. Antony Lewis

Observational Cosmology

Weak Lensing of CMB by Cosmic Strings and its Detectability

CMB studies with Planck

Possible sources of very energetic neutrinos. Active Galactic Nuclei

Measurements of Degree-Scale B-mode Polarization with the BICEP/Keck Experiments at South Pole

Cosmology after Planck

The international scenario Balloons, LiteBIRD, PIXIE, Millimetron

Physics 661. Particle Physics Phenomenology. October 2, Physics 661, lecture 2

Delensing CMB B-modes: results from SPT.

Planck 2015 parameter constraints

WMAP 9-Year Results and Cosmological Implications: The Final Results

Cosmic Inflation and Neutrino Masses at POLARBEAR CMB Polarization Experiment

Power spectrum exercise

Lecture 09. The Cosmic Microwave Background. Part II Features of the Angular Power Spectrum

A5682: Introduction to Cosmology Course Notes. 11. CMB Anisotropy

n=0 l (cos θ) (3) C l a lm 2 (4)

Neutrino Mass Limits from Cosmology

Neutrinos in the era of precision Cosmology

Really, really, what universe do we live in?

Introduction. How did the universe evolve to what it is today?

Concordance Cosmology and Particle Physics. Richard Easther (Yale University)

NEUTRINO COSMOLOGY. ν e ν µ. ν τ STEEN HANNESTAD UNIVERSITY OF AARHUS PARIS, 27 OCTOBER 2006

THE PRIMORDIAL FIREBALL. Joe Silk (IAP, CEA, JHU)

CMB Lensing Reconstruction on PLANCK simulated data

A5682: Introduction to Cosmology Course Notes. 11. CMB Anisotropy

Future precision cosmology and neutrinos

Planck constraints on neutrinos. Massimiliano Lattanzi Università di Ferrara on behalf of the Planck Collaboration

Title Sunyaev Zel dovich Signal & Cross Correlations

Forthcoming CMB experiments and expectations for dark energy. Carlo Baccigalupi

The Outtakes. Back to Talk. Foregrounds Doppler Peaks? SNIa Complementarity Polarization Primer Gamma Approximation ISW Effect

Cosmology. Jörn Wilms Department of Physics University of Warwick.

Determining neutrino masses from cosmology

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 25 Jun 1998

PICO - Probe of Inflation and Cosmic Origins

OVERVIEW OF NEW CMB RESULTS

Which redshifts contribute most?

Lecture 4. - Cosmological parameter dependence of the temperature power spectrum (continued) - Polarisation

Cosmic Microwave Background Introduction

NEUTRINO COSMOLOGY. n m. n e. n t STEEN HANNESTAD UNIVERSITY OF AARHUS PLANCK 06, 31 MAY 2006

Modern Cosmology Solutions 4: LCDM Universe

Ringing in the New Cosmology

Primordial gravitational waves detected? Atsushi Taruya

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.co] 22 Oct 2012

Highlights from Planck 2013 cosmological results Paolo Natoli Università di Ferrara and ASI/ASDC DSU2013, Sissa, 17 October 2013

Astrophysics from Antarctica: overview of recent science

CMB Constraints on Fundamental Physics

UNIVERSITY OF OSLO Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences

Lecture 03. The Cosmic Microwave Background

First Cosmology Results from Planck. Alessandro Melchiorri University of Rome La Sapienza On behalf of the Planck collaboration

The first light in the universe

What can we Learn from the Cosmic Microwave Background

Lecture 3. - Cosmological parameter dependence of the temperature power spectrum. - Polarisation of the CMB

The Cosmological Legacy of Planck

How many neutrino species are there?

Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: The Final Results

CMB Anisotropies Episode II :

Cross-correlations of CMB lensing as tools for cosmology and astrophysics. Alberto Vallinotto Los Alamos National Laboratory

Cosmology with high (z>1) redshift galaxy surveys

SENSITIVITIES OF GRAVITATIONAL-WAVE DETECTION: A CENTURY OUTLOOK

arxiv: v2 [astro-ph.co] 2 Aug 2013

Cosmic sound: near and far

Dark Matter and Cosmic Structure Formation

Constraining primordial magnetic fields with observations

Shear Power of Weak Lensing. Wayne Hu U. Chicago

MODEL INDEPENDENT CONSTRAINTS ON THE IONIZATION HISTORY

Cosmology Large Angular Scale Surveyor. Wednesday, September 25, 13

H 0 is Undervalued BAO CMB. Wayne Hu STSCI, April 2014 BICEP2? Maser Lensing Cepheids. SNIa TRGB SBF. dark energy. curvature. neutrinos. inflation?

Galaxies 626. Lecture 3: From the CMBR to the first star

CMB Episode II: Theory or Reality? Wayne Hu

QUIET-I and QUIET-II:

WMAP 5-Year Results: Implications for Inflation. Eiichiro Komatsu (Department of Astronomy, UT Austin) PPC 2008, May 19, 2008

Dark Energy in Light of the CMB. (or why H 0 is the Dark Energy) Wayne Hu. February 2006, NRAO, VA

NeoClassical Probes. of the Dark Energy. Wayne Hu COSMO04 Toronto, September 2004

Cosmology & CMB. Set6: Polarisation & Secondary Anisotropies. Davide Maino

Probing the Dark Ages with 21 cm Absorption

Dark Radiation from Particle Decay

Physics of CMB Polarization and Its Measurement

Cosmology. Introduction Geometry and expansion history (Cosmic Background Radiation) Growth Secondary anisotropies Large Scale Structure

Modern Cosmology / Scott Dodelson Contents

Polarization from Rayleigh scattering

CMB Constraints on Dark Matter Annihilation. Neelima Sehgal Stony Brook University

V. The Thermal Beginning of the Universe

Transcription:

The CMB and Neutrinos

We can all measure the CMB T CMB =2.725 +\- 0.001 K 400 photons/cc at 0.28 ev/cc CMB approx 1% of TV noise!

But no one has measured the neutrino background.

Neutrinos T ν =1.945 K From particle physics: 3 known families, ~equal numbers of neutrinos and antineutrinos. 113 neutrinos/cc/family 0.05 ev<σm ν <2.3 ev (95%cl) From atmospheric neutrinos at SuperK, ν µ ν τ When I say neutrinos. Tritium end point plus mass splittings. (Kraus et al., 2005)

Neutrinos T ν =1.945 K 3 known families, ~equal numbers of neutrinos and antineutrinos. 113 neutrinos/cc/family 0.05 ev<σm ν <1.2 ev (95%cl) From atmospheric neutrinos at SuperK, ν µ ν τ WMAP alone

Neutrinos T ν =1.945 K 3 known families, ~equal numbers of neutrinos and antineutrinos. 113 neutrinos/cc/family 0.05 ev<σm ν <0.58 ev (95%cl) From atmospheric neutrinos at SuperK, ν µ ν τ WMAP+BAO+H 0

Neutrinos T ν =1.945 K 3 known families, ~equal numbers of neutrinos and antineutrinos. 113 neutrinos/cc/family 0.05 ev<σm ν <0.2 ev (95%cl) From atmospheric neutrinos at SuperK, ν µ ν τ Expected from KATRIN (Franenkel, 2011)

Neutrinos T ν =1.945 K 3 known families, ~equal numbers of neutrinos and antineutrinos. 113 neutrinos/cc/family 0.05 ev<σm ν <0.06 ev (~95%cl) From atmospheric neutrinos at SuperK, ν µ ν τ From Planck plus fine scale CMB polarization measurements (ACT, SPT.)

Cosmic Evolution Decoupling surface Us Decoupling at z=1030

Cosmic Evolution

Cosmic Evolution

Cosmic Evolution At decoupling

1972

The CMB at decoupling as seen through a Lambda-dominated spacetime (and through our galaxy). WMAP at 61 GHz, 0.5 cm

Angular Power Spectrum 6000 5000 compression WMAP 7yr ACT 148 GHz l(l+1)c l TT /2! [!K 2 ] 4000 3000 2000 Model Acoustic peaks rarefaction compression Silk damping tail 1000 Fundamental mode 0 10 50 100 500 1000 1500 2000 3000 Multipole moment l

WMAP The Atacama researchers to map the CMB by measuring these temperature variations. To search for small distortions that might have been caused by lensing, matter. Bec trinos are ex effect on th venting it fr Cosmology Telescope High definition. The Atacama Cosmology Telescope has enabled astronomers to study the cosmic microwave background (inset) in fine detail, revealing the effects of gravitational lensing. 522 ~10X WMAP resolution 29 APRIL 2011 VOL 332 SCIENCE www.sciencemag.org Published by AAAS

The Millimeter Bolometric Array Camera Window 4 He Fridge 3 He Fridge Pulse Tube 148 GHz 218 GHz Optics Detectors 40K Shield 3K Shield 277 GHz 1 m

Preliminary Power Spectrum Silk damping tail

Number of relativistic species, N eff Dunkley et al., 2011 Silk damping tail The key to limiting N eff is to identify the increased damping at small angular scales in the CMB. Jungman, Kamionkowski, Kosowsky, Spergel 1996 Hou et al., 2011 Bashinsky & Seljak, 2004

N eff WMAP ACT+WMAP 5.3 +/- 1.3 ACT+WMAP+BAO+H 0 4.56 +/- 0.75 SPT+WMAP 3.85 +/- 0.62 SPT+WMAP+BAO+H 0 3.86 +/- 0.42 Komatsu et al., 2011 Dunkley et al., 2011 Keisler et al., 2011

Neutrino Mass #1 Compare today to that at decoupling. Greater relativistic means smaller ρ m /ρ r, enhanced potential evolution, and producing less cosmic structure. e.g., Ichikawa et al., 2005 WMAP+BAO+SN, sum <0.58 (95%cl) WMAP Komatsu et al., 2009

Neutrino Mass #2 Use the cosmic structure between us and the surface of last scattering to lens the CMB, especially the small angles where a massive neutrino inhibits the formation of structure. Lensing is characteristically sensitive to m ν

Lensing remaps & magnifies/de-magnifies cmb patches, smoothing out peaks Lensing smoothes out the peaks and alters the statistics of the CMB Θ(ˆn) = Θ(ˆn + φ) lensed Intervening large-scale potentials deflect CMB photons and distort the CMB. unlensed deflection Lens-speak: Lensing potential: φ Deflection field: d = φ Convergence: κ = 1 2 d The RMS deflection is Simulation from about Das 2.7 arcmins, & Bode but (2008) the deflections are coherent on degree scales. Tuesday, March 15, 2011 Sudeep Das, March 2011 From Sudeep Das 7

Simulations uk 100 deg 2 AAS, Jan 7 2010

Simulations uk 100 deg 2 AAS, Jan 7 2010

We Lensing also detect of lensing CMB detected at 4-sigma at 4σ internally from the CMB 4-point function C φφ l A L C φφ l First internal detection of CMB lensing. Based on Hu & Okamoto estimator plus phase randomization. Detection is from 320 sq. degree of ACT equatorial data only. Shape sensitive to neutrino mass. Das, Sherwin et al. arxiv:1103.2124 Sudeep Das, March 2011 9 Tuesday, March 15, 2011

And from SPT van Engelen et al 2012

closed Geometric Degeneracy CMB alone tells us we are on the geometric degeneracy line open Assume flatness =! b +! c { Ωbh2 WMAP7 only best fit LCDM = 0.0226 +/- 0.00057 Ω c h 2 = 0.1109 +/- 0.0056 h = 0.710 +/- 0.025 σ 8 = 0.801 +/- 0.030 τ = 0.088 +/- 0.015 n s = 0.963 +/- 0.014

The Degeneracy Sherwin et al. 2011

Lensing breaks the geometric degeneracy. Lambda=0 excluded at 3.2 sigma from combination of WMAP and ACT. Sherwin et al. 2011

Neutrino Mass #3 Planck: sensitive to l=2000 in polarization Can look through foregrounds in EE at l>2000. Instruments & measurements underway by ACTPol, Polar, Polarbear, SPTPol. AAS, Jan 7 2010

Gravitational lensing turns E-modes into B-modes. Look for the effects of neutrinos in polarization.

Thank You