C. CARPINTERO, N. RAJESH, E. ROSAS AND S. SARANYASRI

Similar documents
ON UPPER AND LOWER CONTRA-ω-CONTINUOUS MULTIFUNCTIONS

ON UPPER AND LOWER ALMOST CONTRA-ω-CONTINUOUS MULTIFUNCTIONS

Weak Resolvable Spaces and. Decomposition of Continuity

N. Karthikeyan 1, N. Rajesh 2. Jeppiaar Engineering College Chennai, , Tamilnadu, INDIA 2 Department of Mathematics

Omega open sets in generalized topological spaces

Songklanakarin Journal of Science and Technology SJST R1 Al Ghour. L-open sets and L^*-open sets

Slightly ω b Continuous Functions in Topological Spaces

ON UPPER AND LOWER WEAKLY I-CONTINUOUS MULTIFUNCTIONS

J. Sanabria, E. Acosta, M. Salas-Brown and O. García

SOME NEW SEPARATION AXIOMS. R. Balaji 1, N. Rajesh 2. Agni College of Technology Kancheepuram, , TamilNadu, INDIA 2 Department of Mathematics

Heyam H. Al-Jarrah Department of Mathematics Faculty of science Yarmouk University Irdid-Jordan

Supra β-connectedness on Topological Spaces

Properties of [γ, γ ]-Preopen Sets

A new classes of open mappings

ON A FINER TOPOLOGICAL SPACE THAN τ θ AND SOME MAPS. E. Ekici. S. Jafari. R.M. Latif

Generalized Star Closed Sets In Interior Minimal Spaces

ON γ-s-urysohn CLOSED AND γ-s-regular CLOSED SPACES

On π bμ Compactness and π bμ Connectedness in Generalized Topological Spaces

µs p -Sets and µs p -Functions

Totally supra b continuous and slightly supra b continuous functions

Research Article Cocompact Open Sets and Continuity

Maximilian GANSTER. appeared in: Soochow J. Math. 15 (1) (1989),

β Baire Spaces and β Baire Property

Topology, Math 581, Fall 2017 last updated: November 24, Topology 1, Math 581, Fall 2017: Notes and homework Krzysztof Chris Ciesielski

Slightly gγ-continuous Functions

On totally g μ b Continuous functions in supra topological spaces

Note on contra nano gb-closed maps

AND RELATION BETWEEN SOME WEAK AND STRONG FORMS OF Τ*-OPEN SETS IN TOPOLOGICAL SPACES

ON µ-compact SETS IN µ-spaces

Fuzzy Soft Topology. G. Kalpana and C. Kalaivani Department of Mathematics, SSN College of Engineering, Kalavakkam , Chennai, India.

α (β,β) -Topological Abelian Groups

Sets and Functions. MATH 464/506, Real Analysis. J. Robert Buchanan. Summer Department of Mathematics. J. Robert Buchanan Sets and Functions

Topology. Xiaolong Han. Department of Mathematics, California State University, Northridge, CA 91330, USA address:

Upper and Lower Rarely α-continuous Multifunctions

Problem Set 2: Solutions Math 201A: Fall 2016

Separation Spaces in Generalized Topology

frg Connectedness in Fine- Topological Spaces

-HYPERCONNECTED IDEAL TOPOLOGICAL SPACES

On totally πg µ r-continuous function in supra topological spaces

Axioms for Set Theory

Topology Part of the Qualify Exams of Department of Mathematics, Texas A&M University Prepared by Zhang, Zecheng

Homework 5. Solutions

g ωα-separation Axioms in Topological Spaces

P.M. Thevar College Usilampatti, Madurai District, Tamil Nadu, INDIA 2 Department of Mathematics

CONNECTEDNESS IN IDEAL TOPOLOGICAL SPACES

M. Caldas and S. Jafari. ON SEMI δs-irresolute FUNCTIONS. 1. Introduction and preliminaries

3 Hausdorff and Connected Spaces

CHARACTERIZATIONS OF HARDLY e-open FUNCTIONS

POL502: Foundations. Kosuke Imai Department of Politics, Princeton University. October 10, 2005

Maths 212: Homework Solutions

Takashi Noiri, Ahmad Al-Omari, Mohd. Salmi Md. Noorani WEAK FORMS OF OPEN AND CLOSED FUNCTIONS

CHAPTER 7. Connectedness

ON ALMOST (ω)regular SPACES

A note on a Soft Topological Space

Regular Generalized Star b-continuous Functions in a Bigeneralized Topological Space

F A S C I C U L I M A T H E M A T I C I

Available at: pocetna.html ON A GENERALIZATION OF NORMAL, ALMOST NORMAL AND MILDLY NORMAL SPACES II

Some results on g-regular and g-normal spaces

Solve EACH of the exercises 1-3

NEW NORMALITY AXIOMS AND DECOMPOSITIONS OF NORMALITY. J. K. Kohli and A. K. Das University of Delhi, India

arxiv:math/ v1 [math.gn] 28 Mar 2007

Problems - Section 17-2, 4, 6c, 9, 10, 13, 14; Section 18-1, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10; Section 19-1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 9;

A NOTE ON Θ-CLOSED SETS AND INVERSE LIMITS

MATH 220 (all sections) Homework #12 not to be turned in posted Friday, November 24, 2017

Contra Pre Generalized b - Continuous Functions in Topological Spaces

On A Weaker Form Of Complete Irresoluteness. Key Words: irresolute function, δ-semiopen set, regular open set. Contents.

On Contra βθ-continuous Functions

Upper and Lower α I Continuous Multifunctions

Int. Journal of Math. Analysis, Vol. 6, 2012, no. 21,

Somewhere Dense Sets and ST 1 -Spaces

Ideal - Weak Structure Space with Some Applications

g -Pre Regular and g -Pre Normal Spaces

Scientiae Mathematicae Japonicae Online, Vol. 6, (2002), PROPERTIES IN TOPOLOGICAL SPACES

On Almost Continuity and Expansion of Open Sets

On Fuzzy Semi-Pre-Generalized Closed Sets

NAME: Mathematics 205A, Fall 2008, Final Examination. Answer Key

LOCAL CLOSURE FUNCTIONS IN IDEAL TOPOLOGICAL SPACES

ΠGβ NORMAL SPACE IN INTUITIOITIC FUZZY TOPOLOGY

1 Topology Definition of a topology Basis (Base) of a topology The subspace topology & the product topology on X Y 3

On β-i-open Sets and a Decomposition of Almost-I-continuity

Generalized Intuitionistic Fuzzy Ideals Topological Spaces

On z-θ-open Sets and Strongly θ-z-continuous Functions

-θ-semiopen Sets and

5 Set Operations, Functions, and Counting

Chapter 1 : The language of mathematics.

CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION & PRELIMINARIES

N αc Open Sets and Their Basic Properties in Topological Spaces

ON QUASI-FUZZY H-CLOSED SPACE AND CONVERGENCE. Yoon Kyo-Chil and Myung Jae-Duek

A study on gr*-closed sets in Bitopological Spaces

M. Suraiya Begum, M. Sheik John IJSRE Volume 4 Issue 6 June 2016 Page 5466

Soft -Closed Sets In Soft Čech Closure Space

Real Analysis Math 131AH Rudin, Chapter #1. Dominique Abdi

1. Introduction. Novi Sad J. Math. Vol. 38, No. 2, 2008, E. Ekici 1, S. Jafari 2, M. Caldas 3 and T. Noiri 4

MATH 3300 Test 1. Name: Student Id:

Solutions to Tutorial 8 (Week 9)

In N we can do addition, but in order to do subtraction we need to extend N to the integers

Slightly γ-continuous Functions. Key words: clopen, γ-open, γ-continuity, slightly continuity, slightly γ-continuity. Contents

Continuous functions with compact support

CHODOUNSKY, DAVID, M.A. Relative Topological Properties. (2006) Directed by Dr. Jerry Vaughan. 48pp.

PREOPEN SETS AND RESOLVABLE SPACES

Transcription:

SARAJEVO JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS Vol.11 (23), No.1, (2015), 131 137 DOI: 10.5644/SJM.11.1.11 SOMEWHAT ω-continuous FUNCTIONS C. CARPINTERO, N. RAJESH, E. ROSAS AND S. SARANYASRI Abstract. In this paper we introduce and study a new classes of functions called somewhat ω-continuous functions as a generalization of the somewhat continuous functions. 1. Introduction and preliminaries Generalized open sets play a very important role in General Topology and they are now the research topics of many topologists worldwide. Indeed a significant theme in General Topology and Real Analysis concerns the variously modified forms of continuity, separation axioms etc. by utilizing generalized closed sets. Recently, as generalization of closed sets, the notion of ω-closed sets were introduced and studied by Hdeib [3]. A point x X is called a condensation point of A if for each U τ with x U, the set U A is uncountable. A subset A is said to be ω-closed [3] if it contains all its condensation points. The complement of an ω-closed set is said to be an ω-open set. It is well known that a subset W of a space (X, τ) is ω-open if and only if for each x W, there exists U τ such that x U and U\W is countable. The family of all ω-open subsets of a topological space (X, τ) forms a topology on X which is finer than τ. The set of all ω-open sets of (X, τ) is denoted by ωo(x). The set of all ω-open sets of (X, τ) containing a point x X is denoted by ωo(x, x). The intersection of all ω-closed sets containing S is called the ω-closure of S and is denoted by ω Cl(S). The ω-interior of S is defined by the union of all ω-open sets contained in S and is denoted by ω Int(S). A function f : (X, τ) (Y, σ) is said to be ω-continuous if for each U σ, f 1 (U) is an ω-open set in X. clearly every continuous function is an ω-continuous function. 2010 Mathematics Subject Classification. 54B05,54C08. Key words and phrases. ω-open sets, somewhat ω-continuous functions, somewhat continuous functions. Copyright c 2015 by ANUBiH.

132 C. CARPINTERO, N. RAJESH, E. ROSAS AND S. SARANYASRI 2. Somewhat ω-continuous functions Definition 2.1. A function f : (X, τ) (Y, σ) is said to be somewhat ω-continuous if for U σ and f 1 (U), there exists an ω-open set V in X such that V and V f 1 (U). Observe that every ω-continuous function is somewhat ω-continuous, but the converse is not true in general. Example 2.2. Let X = R with topology the standard topology τ and Y = {a, b} with topology σ = {, Y, {a}, {b}}. Define F : (R, τ) (Y, σ) as follows: { a if x 0 F (x) = b if x < 0. It is easy to see that F is somewhat ω-continuous but is not ω-continuous. Definition 2.3. A function f : (X, τ) (Y, σ) is said to be somewhat continuous [2] if for U σ and f 1 (U), there exists an open set V in X such that V and V f 1 (U). It is clear that every somewhat continuous function is somewhat ω-continuous. But the converse is not true in general. Example 2.4. Let X = R with topology τ = {, R, Q} and Y = R with topology σ = {, R, Q, R Q}. Define F : (R, τ) (R, σ) as the identity function. It is easy to see that F is somewhat ω-continuous but is not somewhat continuous. The following example shows that the composition of two somewhat ω- continuous need not be somewhat ω-continuous, even if one of then is ω- continuous and not continuous, the composition need not be somewhat ω- continuous. Example 2.5. Let X = R with topology τ = {, R, R Q} and Y = {a, b, c} with topologies β = {, Y, {b}, {a, c}} and σ = {, Y, {a, b}}. Define f : (X, τ) (Y, β) by a if x Q, f(x) = c if x (R Q) {e}, a if x = e, where e is an irrational number. Let g : (Y, β) (Y, σ) the identity map. Observe that f is ω-continuous and not continuous, g is somewhat ω-continuous but the composition gf is not somewhat ω-continuous, because (gf) 1 ({a, b}) = Q {e} and there are not exists ω-open set V in X such that V (gf) 1 ({a, b}).

SOMEWHAT ω-continuous FUNCTIONS 133 The next proposition states that if the map g is continuous and f is somewhat ω-continuous, then the composition is somewhat ω-continuous. Proposition 2.6. If f : (X, τ) (Y, σ) is somewhat ω-continuous and g : (X, σ) (Z, η) is continuous, then g f : (X, τ) (Z, η) is somewhat ω-continuous. Definition 2.7. A subset M of a topological space (X, τ) is said to be ω- dense in X if there is no proper ω-closed set C in X such that M C X. Example 2.8. Let X = R with topology τ = {, R, Q}. It is easy to see that R Q is an ω-dense set in X, but Q is not an ω-dense set in X. Proposition 2.9. A subset M of a topological space (X, τ) is ω-dense in X if for any nonempty ω-open set U in X, U M Theorem 2.10. For a surjective function f : (X, τ) (Y, σ), the following statements are equivalent: (1) f is somewhat ω-continuous. (2) If C is a closed subset of Y such that f 1 (C) X, then there is a proper ω-closed subset D of X such that D f 1 (C). (3) If M is an ω-dense subset of X, then f(m) is a dense subset of Y. Proof. (1) (2): Let C be a closed subset of Y such that f 1 (C) X. Then Y \C is an open set in Y such that f 1 (Y \C) = X\f 1 (C). By (1), there exists an ω-open set V in X such that V and V f 1 (Y \C) = X\f 1 (C). This means that X\V f 1 (C) and X\V = D is a proper ω-closed set in X. (2) (3): Let M be an ω-dense set in X. Suppose that f(m) is not dense in Y. Then there exists a proper closed set C in Y such that f(m) C Y. Clearly f 1 (C) X. By (2), there exists a proper ω-closed set D such that M f 1 (C) D X. This is a contradiction of the fact that M is ω-dense in X. (3) (1): Suppose that f is not a somewhat ω-continuous function, then there exists a nonempty open set U in Y such that ω-interior of f 1 (U) is empty, that is X\f 1 (U) is ω-dense in X, while f(x\f 1 (U)) = Y \U is not dense in Y. This is a contradiction. Lemma 2.11. [1] Let A and B be subsets of a space (X, τ). (1) If A ωo(x, τ) and B τ, then A B ωo(b, τ B ); (2) If A ωo(b, τ B ) and B ωo(x, τ), then A ωo(x, τ). Proposition 2.12. Let f : (X, τ) (Y, σ) be a function and X = A B, where A, B τ. If the restriction functions f A : (A, τ A ) (Y, σ) and f B : (B, τ B ) (Y, σ) are somewhat ω-continuous, then f is somewhat ω-continuous.

134 C. CARPINTERO, N. RAJESH, E. ROSAS AND S. SARANYASRI Proof. Let U be any open subset of Y such that f 1 (U). Then (f A ) 1 (U) or (f B ) 1 (U) or both (f A ) 1 (U) and (f B ) 1 (U). Suppose (f A ) 1 (U). Since f A is somewhat ω-continuous, there exists an ω-open set V in A such that V and V (f A ) 1 (U) f 1 (U). Since V is ω-open in A and A is open in X, V is ω-open in X. Thus we find that f is somewhat ω-continuous. The proof of other cases are similar. Definition 2.13. If X is a set and τ and σ are topologies on X, then τ is said to be ω-equivalent (equivalent [2]) to σ provided if U τ and U, then there is an ω-open (open [2]) set V in (X, σ) such that V and V U and if U σ and U, then there is an ω-open (open) set V in (X, τ) such that V and U V. Example 2.14. Let X = R with topologies τ = {, R, Q} and σ = {, R, Q, R Q}. It is easy to see that τ and σ are ω-equivalent but τ and σ are not equivalent. Now, consider the identity function f : (X, τ) (Y, σ) and assume that τ and σ are ω-equivalent. Then f : (X, τ) (Y, σ) and f 1 : (Y, σ) (X, τ) are somewhat ω-continuous. Conversely, if the identity function f : (X, τ) (X, σ) is somewhat ω-continuous in both directions, then τ and σ are ω- equivalent. Proposition 2.15. Let f : (X, τ) (Y, σ) be a somewhat ω-continuous surjection and τ be a topology for X, which is ω-equivalent to τ. Then f : (X, τ ) (Y, σ) is somewhat ω-continuous. Proof. Let V be an open subset of Y such that f 1 (V ). Since f : (X, τ) (Y, σ) is somewhat ω-continuous, there exists a nonempty ω-open set U in (X, τ) such that U f 1 (V ). But by hypothesis τ is ω-equivalent to τ. Therefore, there exists an ω-open set U in (X, τ ) such that U U. But U f 1 (V ). Then U f 1 (V ); hence f : (X, τ ) (Y, σ) is somewhat ω-continuous. Proposition 2.16. Let f : (X, τ) (Y, σ) be a somewhat ω-continuous surjection and σ be a topology for Y, which is equivalent to σ. Then f : (X, τ) (Y, σ ) is somewhat ω-continuous. Proof. Let V be an open set of (Y, σ ) such that f 1 (V ). Since σ is equivalent to σ, there exists a nonempty open set V in (Y, σ) such that V V. Now = f 1 (V ) f 1 (V ). Since f : (X, τ) (Y, σ) is somewhat ω-continuous, there exists a nonempty ω-open set U in (X, τ) such that U f 1 (V ). Then U f 1 (V ); hence f : (X, τ) (Y, σ ) is somewhat ω-continuous.

SOMEWHAT ω-continuous FUNCTIONS 135 Definition 2.17. A function f : (X, τ) (Y, σ) is said to be somewhat ω-open provided that if U τ and U, then there exists an ω-open set V in Y such that V and V f(u). Definition 2.18. A function f : (X, τ) (Y, σ) is said to be somewhat open [2] provided that if U τ and U, then there exists an open set V in Y such that V and V f(u). It is clear that every somewhat open is somewhat ω-open. But the converse is not true in general. Example 2.19. Let X = R with topology τ = {, R, Q} and Y = {a, b, c} with topology σ = {, Y, {a}}. Define F : (R, τ) (Y, σ) as follows: { a if x R Q F (x) = b if x Q. It is easy to see that F is somewhat ω-open but is not somewhat open. Proposition 2.20. Let f : (X, τ) (Y, σ) be an open function and g : (Y, σ) (Z, γ) somewhat ω-open. Then g f : (X, τ) (Z, γ) is somewhat ω-open. Proposition 2.21. For a bijective function f : (X, τ) (Y, σ), the following statements are equivalent: (1) f is somewhat ω-open. (2) If C is a closed subset of X, such that f(c) Y, then there is an ω-closed subset D of Y such that D Y and D f(c). Proof. Since f is somewhat ω-open if and only if f 1 is somewhat ω-continuous, then (1) (2) is obvious by Theorem 2.10. Proposition 2.22. For a function f : (X, τ) (Y, σ), the following statements are equivalent: (1) f is somewhat ω-open. (2) If A is an ω-dense subset of Y, then f 1 (A) is a dense subset of X. Proof. (1) (2): Suppose A is an ω-dense set in Y. We want to show that f 1 (A) is a dense subset of X. Suppose not, then there exists a closed set B in X such that f 1 (A) B X. Since f is somewhat ω-open and X\B is open, there exists a nonempty ω-open set C in Y such that C f(x\b). Therefore, C f(x\b) f(f 1 (Y \A)) Y \A. That is, A Y \C Y. Now, Y \C is an ω-closed set and A Y \C Y. This implies that A is not an ω-dense set in Y, which is a contradiction. Therefore, f 1 (A) must be a dense set in X. (2) (1): Suppose A is a nonempty open subset of X. We want to show that ω Int(f(A)). Suppose ω Int(f(A)) =. Then, ω Cl(Y \f(a)) =

136 C. CARPINTERO, N. RAJESH, E. ROSAS AND S. SARANYASRI Y. Therefore, by (2), f 1 (Y \f(a)) is dense in X. But f 1 (Y \f(a)) X\A. Now, X\A is closed. Therefore, f 1 (Y \f(a)) X\A gives X = Cl(f 1 (Y \f(a))) X\A. This implies that A =, which is contrary to A. Therefore, ω Int(f(A)). This proves that f is somewhat ω- open. Proposition 2.23. Let f : (X, τ) (Y, σ) be somewhat ω-open and A be any open subset of X. Then f A : (A, τ A ) (Y, σ) is somewhat ω-open. Proof. Let U τ A such that U. Since U is open in A and A is open in X, U is open in X and since by hypothesis f : (X, τ) (Y, σ) is somewhat ω-open function, there exists an ω-open set V in Y, such that V f(u). Thus, for any open set U of A with U, there exists an ω-open set V in Y such that V f(u) which implies f A is a somewhat ω-open function. Proposition 2.24. Let f : (X, τ) (Y, σ) be a function and X = A B, where A, B τ. If the restriction functions f A and f B are somewhat ω- open, then f is somewhat ω-open. Proof. Let U be any open subset of X such that U. Since X = A B, either A U or B U or both A U and B U. Since U is open in X, U is open in both A and B. Case (i): Suppose that A U, where U A is open in A. Since f A is somewhat ω-open function, there exists an ω-open set V of Y such that V f(u A) f(u), which implies that f is a somewhat ω-open function. Case (ii): Suppose that B U, where U B is open in B. Since f B is somewhat ω-open function, there exists an ω-open set V in Y such that V f(u B) f(u), which implies that f is also a somewhat ω-open function. Case (iii): Suppose that both A U and B U. Then by case (i) and (ii) f is a somewhat ω-open function. Remark 2.25. Two topologies τ and σ for X are said to be ω-equivalent if and only if the identity function f : (X, τ) (X, σ) is somewhat ω-open in both directions. Proposition 2.26. Let f : (X, τ) (Y, σ) be a somewhat open function. Let τ and σ be topologies for X and Y, respectively such that τ is equivalent to τ and σ is ω-equivalent to σ. Then f : (X, τ ) (Y, σ ) is somewhat ω-open. References [1] K. Al-Zoubi and B. Al-Nashef, The topology of ω-open subsets, Al-Manarah, IX (2)(2003), 169 179.

SOMEWHAT ω-continuous FUNCTIONS 137 [2] K. R. Gentry and H. B. Hoyle, Somewhat continuous functions, Czechslovak Math. J., 21 (96) (1971), 5 12. doi:zbl 0222.54010. [3] H. Z. Hdeib, ω-closed mappings, Rev. Colomb. Mat., 16 (1-2) (1982), 65 78. (Received: June 5, 2014) C. Carpintero and E. Rosas Department of Mathematics Universidad De Oriente Nucleo De Sucre Cumana Venezuela carpintero.carlos@gmail.com ennisrafael@gmail.com N. Rajesh Department of Mathematics Rajah Serfoji Govt. College Thanjavur-613005 Tamilnadu, India nrajesh topology@yahoo.co.in S. Saranyasri Department of Mathematics M. R. K. Institute of Technology Kattumannarkoil, Cuddalore 608 301 Tamilnadu, India srisaranya 2010@yahoo.com