Results of the (i) Fifth Airborne Monitoring Survey and (ii) Airborne Monitoring Survey Outside 80km from the Fukushima Dai-ichi NPP

Similar documents
Results of Airborne Monitoring Survey by MEXT in the Chugoku Region

Results of the Airborne Monitoring in the evacuation-directed zones

Analysis Results Concerning (i) Gamma-emitting Nuclides and (ii) Sr-89 and Sr-90 (Second Distribution Survey) by MEXT

Kazuaki Yajima, Kazuki Iwaoka, and Hiroshi Yasuda

Preparation of Distribution Map of Radiation Doses, etc. (Maps of. Concentration of Tellurium 129m and Silver 110m in Soil) by MEXT

Simulation of Radioactivity Concentrations in the Sea Area (the 5th report

European Fallout from Chernobyl

Environmental radiation measurements immediately after the accident and dose evaluations based on soil deposition

Radiation and Radioactivity Monitoring in the Surrounding Environment after Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Plant Accident - Overview -

Fukushima-Daiichi Accident: Main contamination events

Information (17:30), January 11, 2019

Initial substantial reduction in air dose rates of Cs origin and personal doses for residents owing to the Fukushima nuclear accident

LATE PHASE OF NUCLEAR ACCIDENT IN AGRICULTURE WEAKNESSES IN DECISION MAKING DUE TO LACK OF DATA, KNOWLEDGE AND SKILL AND POSSIBLE INNOVATION

Information (11:00), February 12, 2019

Analysis on the formation process of high dose rate zone in the northwest direction of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant

Analysis of gross alpha, gross beta activities and beryllium-7 concentrations in surface air: their variation and statistical prediction model

In Situ Gamma Spectrometry Intercomparison in Fukushima, Japan

Dr. Ryohji Ohba (Nuclear Safety Research Association )

Implementation Guides on Sea Area Monitoring

Dose Reconstruction Methods and Source Term Assessment using Data from Monitoring Networks and Mobile Teams A German Approach

Information (10:00), July 3, 2018

ABSTRACT 1. INTRODUCTION

Heavy Rain/Flooding September 8-10 Associated with Tropical Storm Etau

Name of research institute or organization: Bundesamt für Gesundheit, Sektion Umweltradioaktivität, Bern


THE 2011 TOHOKU EARTHQUAKE IN JAPAN. VSU Lyuben Karavelov, Sofia, Bulgaria. Key words: Tohoku earthquake, strong ground motion, damage

Terrestrial Gamma Radiation Dose Rate in Japan Estimated before the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake

RADIATION MEASUREMENTS AT THE CAMPUS OF FUKUSHIMA MEDICAL UNIVERSITY THROUGH THE 2011 OFF THE PACIFIC COAST OF TOHOKU EARTHQUAKE AND

MAPS OF RATIOS OF DIFFERENT GROUND DEPOSITION DATASETS

Assessment of atmospheric dispersion and radiological consequences for the Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Plant accident

October 2017 November Employees Contractors

Detection in Muncie, Indiana, of the Fukushima Nuclear Reactor Releases Following the Japanese Earthquake"

Geographical distribution of radioactive nuclides released from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station accident in eastern Japan

THE ENVIRONMENTAL RADIATION ANALYSIS ON THE RESIDENTIAL AREA AROUND NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS

Measurement of the environmental radiation dose due to the accident at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant

Assessment of atmospheric dispersion and radiological consequences for the Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Plant accident

APPENDIX 2 OVERVIEW OF THE GLOBAL PRECIPITATION MEASUREMENT (GPM) AND THE TROPICAL RAINFALL MEASURING MISSION (TRMM) 2-1

Radioactive Waste Management

Accelerator Facility Accident Report

Airborne Geophysical Survey Report River Jordan Property

Modeling Radiological Consequences of Sever Accidents in BWRs: Review of Models Development, Verification and Validation

Atmospheric behavior, deposition, and budget of radioactive materials from the. Yu Morino, Toshimasa Ohara, * and Masato Nishizawa

Bugs in JRA-55 snow depth analysis

Employees Contractors

Evaluating the Impact of the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant Accident

QUANTITATIVE Cs-137 DISTRIBUTIONS FROM AIRBORNE GAMMA RAY DATA

The Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy (SOFIA)

Fukushima nuclear power plant damaged by M9 Earthquake with some focus on ocean

Readings at Monitoring Post out of 20 Km Zone of Fukushima Dai-ichi NPP

Radioactivity in the Risø District January-June Risø-R-Report. DTU Nutech Report

Behavior of radioactive cesium accumulation in water bodies in contaminated area by FDNPP accident

Measurement of induced radioactivity in air and water for medical accelerators

Erik L. Swanberg 1 and Steven G. Hoffert 2. Veridian Systems 1, Autometric 2. Sponsored by Defense Threat Reduction Agency

arxiv: v1 [physics.med-ph] 19 Aug 2014

Geostatistical Interpolation: Kriging and the Fukushima Data. Erik Hoel Colligium Ramazzini October 30, 2011

K. Ochi et al. Scale of radiation measurement using each tool.

Pacific Storm Track at Different Horizontal Resolutions Snap-shot of Column Liquid Water Content

Analysis of Environmental Gamma-Ray Intensity Increase Due to Precipitation Using EGS4 Monte Carlo Simulation Code

Page 1. Name:

2) Estimate your annual radiation dose from background radiation.

Detection of gamma-rays from winter thunderclouds along the coast of Japan Sea

TEPCO s Activities on the Investigation into Unsolved Issues in the Fukushima Daiichi NPS Accident

Employees Contractors

2017 Fall Conditions Report

Handmade Becquerel meter using commercial scintillation survey meter

Naka-Gun, Ibaraki, , Japan

Car-Borne Survey Using Ge Semiconductor Detector in the Chugoku Region of Japan

Chapter 3 Analysis of Radioactive Release from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station

Which Earth latitude receives the greatest intensity of insolation when Earth is at the position shown in the diagram? A) 0 B) 23 N C) 55 N D) 90 N

Risø-R-Report. DTU Nutech Report. Radioactivity in the Risø District January-June 2014

Supplemental Information for. Thompson, L.G., et al. Ice Core Records of Climate Variability on the Third Pole

THE USE OF GAMMA RAY DATA TO DEFINE THE NATURAL RADIATION ENVIRONMENT

ROKAF Weather Wing Lt. Park Inchun Lee Jaewon, Lee Jaejin

Terrestrial gamma dose rates along one of the coastal highways in Sri Lanka

Monthly Long Range Weather Commentary Issued: APRIL 1, 2015 Steven A. Root, CCM, President/CEO

High Resolution Modeling of Multi-scale Cloud and Precipitation Systems Using a Cloud-Resolving Model

Tohoku Earthquake and Tsunami Japan March 11, 2011 Information updated 4/19/2011

Correlation between neutrons detected outside the reactor building and fuel melting

Analysis of meteorological measurements made over three rainy seasons in Sinazongwe District, Zambia.

Measurement of Gamma Radiation at Junior High School Sites in Fukushima City

UPDATE OF REGIONAL WEATHER AND SMOKE HAZE (February 2018)

Changes in Air Temperature and Its Relation to Ambulance Transports Due to Heat Stroke in All 47 Prefectures of Japan

REPORT ON THE TOHOKU AREA PASIFIC OFFSHORE EARTHQUAKE

FP release behavior at Unit-2 estimated from CAMS readings on March 14 th and 15 th

Chapter 1 Climate in 2016

Atmospheric Radon Daughters Concentration Inside and Outside of Cloud

Charged Particle Measurements in Mars Orbit from 2002 to 2006

Journal of Radiation Protection and Research

Information about the effects of the reactor disaster in Fukushima on the worldwide networked

Lab Activity: Climate Variables

Sediment Deposition LET THE RIVER RUN T E A C H E R. Activity Overview. Activity at a Glance. Time Required. Level of Complexity.

Atmospheric behavior, deposition, and budget of radioactive materials from the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant in March 2011

(Received April 25, 2012; Accepted June 30, 2012)

Becky Bolinger Water Availability Task Force November 13, 2018

Heavy Rainfall Disaster in Eastern Japan Caused by Typhoon 0206 from July 9 to 12, 2002

Survey of Environmental Radiation Dose Rates in Kyoto and Shiga Prefectures, Japan

Identification of Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material in Sand

Funding provided by NOAA Sectoral Applications Research Project CLIMATE. Basic Climatology Oklahoma Climatological Survey

2016 Fall Conditions Report

Hideharu HONOKI +, Koichi WATANABE,, Hajime IIDA -, Kunio KAWADA. and Kazuichi HAYAKAWA / Abstract. +. Introduction

Transcription:

September 28, 2012 Results of the (i) Fifth Airborne Monitoring Survey and (ii) Airborne Monitoring Survey Outside 80km from the The results of the airborne monitoring survey within a 80km radius of the Fukushima Dai-ichi NPP by MEXT (the fifth airborne monitoring) (announced on June 21, 2012) and the airborne monitoring outside the 80km range from the (announced on March 30, 2012) were summarized today, so they are provided here. 1. Objective of monitoring In order to ascertain the changes in the situation regarding the effect of radioactive materials, MEXT has continued conducting airborne monitoring *1 within a 80km radius of the TEPCO, with the latest on November 5, 2011, conducted to ascertain the distribution of air dose rates and the deposition of radioactive cesium *2 in the target region. Moreover, in order to ascertain the effect of radioactive materials over a wide area, MEXT conducted airborne monitoring outside 80km from the in all of Eastern Japan (22 prefectures, including Tokyo) from June to November of 2011, and in Western Japan and Hokkaido from January to May of 2012. As a result, we were able to ascertain the distribution of air dose rates and the deposition of radioactive cesium *3 in these regions. On the other hand, in order to ascertain the changing trends in the effect of radioactive materials, including those due to environmental circumstances, such as rainfall, the continued airborne monitoring of areas within a 80km radius of the with high air dose rates and deposition amounts of radioactive cesium, and such areas outside 80 km from the Fukushima Dai-ichi NPP (areas centering on western Fukushima prefecture and Ibaraki, Gunma, Tochigi, and Miyagi prefectures) is necessary. Therefore, in this survey, in order to ascertain the changing trends in the effect of radioactive materials, including those due to environmental circumstances, such as rainfall, from the previous monitoring, we conducted airborne monitoring for: (i) Areas within a 80km radius of the (the fifth airborne monitoring) (ii) Areas outside 80km from the, centering on western Fukushima prefecture and Ibaraki, Gunma, Tochigi, and Miyagi prefectures.

*1: Airborne monitoring is a technique in which large, highly sensitive radiation detectors are installed in an aircraft, and gamma rays from radioactive substances accumulated in the ground are quickly measured over a large area, in order to check the surface deposition. *2: For details, refer to Results of the Fourth Airborne Monitoring Survey by MEXT (announced on December 16, 2011) *3: For details, refer to Results of Airborne Monitoring Survey by MEXT in Aichi, Aomori, Ishikawa, and Fukui Prefectures (announced on November 25, 2011) and (i) Results of Airborne Monitoring Survey in Hokkaido and (ii) Revision to the Results of Airborne Monitoring Survey over the Eastern Part of Japan with Detailed Consideration of the Influence of Natural Radionuclides (announced on July 27, 2012). 2. Details of monitoring (i) The fifth airborne monitoring (airborne monitoring within a 80km radius of the ) Target area: within a 80km radius of the Monitoring period: June 22 to June 28, 2012 (20 flights in total) Aircraft: Private helicopters (one BELL430 and one AS332) Monitoring institution: Oyo corporation Analyzing institution: Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Japan Chemical Analysis Center, Nuclear Safety Technology Center Items covered: Air dose rates at 1m above the ground surface, and deposition of radioactive cesium on the ground surface, within a 80km radius of the Fukushima Dai-ichi NPP (ii) Airborne Monitoring Survey Outside 80km from the Target area: Of the areas outside 80km from the, the area and surrounding areas where a relatively high air dose rate and deposition amounts of radioactive cesium were measured *4 in the airborne monitoring survey that were conducted between June and November 2011. *4: Area and surrounding areas outside 80km from the with an air dose rate of 0.2μSv/h or higher with a certain level of expansion (western Fukushima prefecture, Ibaraki, Gunma, Tochigi, and Miyagi prefectures, southern Iwate prefecture, northern Chiba prefecture, and eastern Yamagata prefecture). Monitoring period: April 2 to May 7, 2012 (59 flights in total) Aircraft: Private helicopters (one BELL412EP and one BELL430) Monitoring institution: Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Nuclear Safety Technology Center Analyzing institution: Japan Atomic Energy Agency Items covered: Air dose rates at 1m above the ground surface, and deposition of radioactive cesium on the ground surface, outside 80km from the Fukushima Dai-ichi NPP

3. Results of monitoring (i) Results of the Fifth Airborne Monitoring Survey Based on the survey results from the fifth airborne monitoring survey, the Distribution Map of Air Dose Rate showing the distribution of air dose rates at 1m above the ground surface within a 80km radius of the is as given in Attachment 1. Also, the Distribution Maps of Radioactive Cesium on the Soil Surface showing the deposition of radioactive cesium on the soil surface within a 80km radius of the are as given in Attachments 2 to 4. In preparing the maps in Attachments 1 to 4, the values have been decay-compensated to the value for June 28, 2012, which is the final day in which the fifth airborne monitoring survey was conducted. (ii) Results of the Airborne Monitoring Survey Outside 80km from the Fukushima Dai-ichi NPP Based on the survey results from the airborne monitoring outside 80km from the Fukushima Dai-ichi NPP, the Distribution Map of Air Dose Rate showing the distribution of air dose rates at 1m above the ground surface outside 80km from the is as given in Attachment 5. Also, the Distribution Maps of Radioactive Cesium on the Soil Surface showing the deposition of radioactive cesium on the soil surface outside 80km from the Fukushima Dai-ichi NPP are as given in Attachments 6 to 8. In preparing the maps in Attachment 5 to 8, the values have been decay-compensated to the value for June 28, 2012, which was the final day of the airborne monitoring survey outside 80km from the. Note that snowfall was confirmed in certain regions (western Fukushima prefecture, Gunma prefecture, eastern Yamagata prefecture, etc.) within the range where the monitoring outside 80km from the was conducted. With regard to these regions, it has been expected that the air dose rate measurements are apt to be lower due to the effect of snow coverage. Therefore, in order to distinguish areas covered by snow, *5 such areas are indicated in white and demarcated with solid lines on the maps. *5: When identifying areas covered by snow, we used data obtained by NASA s earth observation satellites, Terra and Aqua, which are available on JAXA Satellite Monitoring for Environmental Studies (JASMES), released by the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency. As they are 500m-grid data, snow coverage over 5cm with an even surface can be indicated correctly, but it is sometimes difficult to accurately identify snow coverage of a shallower depth or with an uneven surface. Therefore, it is possible that there are areas with snow coverage other than those indicated in white and demarcated with solid lines on the maps in Attachment 5 to 8.

Other than that, in order to respond to inquiries concerning the distribution of air dose rates and the distribution of radioactive cesium, we created maps that detail the measurement results of the airborne monitoring of areas within a 80km radius of the (fifth airborne survey) in addition to the measurement results of airborne monitoring of areas outside 80km from the (see Reference 1 to 4). In preparing the maps in reference 1 to 4, the results for the airborne monitoring of areas outside 80km from the have been decay-compensated to the value for June 28, 2012, which was the final day of the fifth airborne monitoring survey. In this correction, the effects of the transition of radioactive materials due to environmental circumstances such as wind, rain, etc. were not considered. The details of conditions in creating these maps are given in Reference 5. 4. Considerations regarding this survey In this survey, in order to confirm the situation of changes in the effect of radioactive materials, the monitoring of areas both within and outside 80km from the was conducted. Of this, in the areas outside 80km from the, snow coverage was confirmed in certain areas, such as western Fukushima prefecture, Gunma prefectures, and eastern Yamagata prefecture. Due to this, we were unable to accurately identify a decrease in air dose rates, and thus we were unable to evaluate the changes in the air dose rates. Therefore, with regard to the trend of decreasing air dose rates, considerations were made based on the results for monitoring within a 80km radius of the. In order to confirm changes in air dose rates, we compared the survey results for the fourth airborne survey (air dose rates) (as of November 5, 2011) and the fifth airborne survey (air dose rates) (as of June 28, 2012). As shown in Attachment 9, although each measurement point shows certain variations in changes in air dose rates, we were able to confirm as a trend that the air dose rates decreased by around 23% during the period between the fourth and fifth airborne monitoring (just under eight months). Since the decrease in air dose rates due to the decay of radioactive cesium during the same period was around 14%, it was confirmed that the decrease in air dose rates for areas within a 80km radius of the was larger than the decrease in air dose rates accompanying the decay of radioactive cesium. The reason for this may be attributed to the effects of environmental circumstances, such as rainfall, during the period between the fourth and fifth airborne monitoring. However, the effect of differences in the conversion factor of air dose rates, as well as differences in the flight path and flight altitude in each monitoring may also be considered as a factor. Therefore, in order to confirm the details of the trend of decreasing air dose rates, it is necessary to continue conducting the airborne monitoring.

5. Future plans We will continue to conduct airborne monitoring for the areas within a 80km radius of the, and to confirm the changes in the situation for the effect of radioactive materials for each season. Moreover, with regard to areas outside 80km from the Fukushima Dai-ichi NPP, we will conduct airborne monitoring again after the typhoon season to confirm the changes in the situation concerning the effect of radioactive materials accompanying the effects of the typhoons. Contacts: Kato Emergency Operation Center, Tel.: 03-5253-4111 Ext.: 4604, 4605

Attachment 1 Results of the Fifth Airborne Monitoring Survey by MEXT (Air dose rates at the height of 1m above the ground surface within a 80 km radius of the )(As of June 28, 2012) Air dose rate over 1 meter above ground level ( Sv/h) Compensated value as of June 28,2012 Areas where readings were not obtained This map contains air dose rates by natural radionuclides.

Attachment 2 Results of the Fifth Airborne Monitoring Survey by MEXT (Total deposition amount of cesium 134 and cesium 137 on the ground surface within a 80 km radius from the ) (As of June 28, 2012) Total deposition amount of Cs-134 and Cs-137 (Bq/m 2 ) Compensated value as of June 28,2012 Areas where readings were not obtained

Results of the Fifth Airborne Monitoring Survey by MEXT (Deposition amount of cesium 134 on the ground surface within a 80 km radius of the ) (As of June 28, 2012) Attachment 3 Deposition amount of Cs-134 (Bq/m 2 ) Compensated value as of June 28,2012 Areas where readings were not obtained

Results of the Fifth Airborne Monitoring Survey by MEXT (Deposition amount of cesium 137 on the ground surface within a 80 km radius of the ) (As of June 28, 2012) Attachment 4 Deposition amount of Cs-137 (Bq/m 2 ) Compensated value as of June 28,2012 Areas where readings were not obtained

Attachment 5 Results of the Airborne Monitoring Survey Outside 80 km from the (Air dose rates at the height of 1m above the ground surface) (As of May 7,2012) Air dose rate over 1 meter above ground level ( Sv/h) Compensated value as of May 7, 2012 Area of snow coverage (March 26 to April 26, 2012) Iwate, Miyagi, Yamagata, Fukushima, Ibaraki, Tochigi, Gunma, Chiba prefecture as the target JASMES: Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) *This map contains air dose rates by natural radionuclides. *The parts indicated in white and demarcated with solid lines on the map indicate areas that are covered with snow, and air dose rates in these areas and the surrounding areas may possibly be lower than when there was no snow coverage due to shielding by the snow.

Attachment 6 Results of the Airborne Monitoring Survey Outside 80 km from the (Total deposition amount of cesium 134 and cesium 137 on the ground surface) (As of May 7,2012) Total accumulation of Cs-134 and Cs-137 (Bq/m 2 ) Compensated value as of May 7, 2012 Area of snow coverage (March 26 to April 26, 2012) Iwate, Miyagi, Yamagata, Fukushima, Ibaraki, Tochigi, Gunma, Chiba prefecture as the target JASMES: Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) *The parts indicated in white and demarcated with solid lines on the map indicate areas that are covered with snow, and deposition amounts of radioactive cesium in these areas and the surrounding areas may possibly be lower than when there was no snow coverage due to shielding by the snow.

Attachment 7 Results of the Airborne Monitoring Survey Outside 80 km from the (Deposition amount of cesium 134 on the ground surface) (As of May 7,2012) Accumulation of Cs-134 (Bq/m 2 ) Compensated value as of May 7, 2012 Area of snow coverage (March 26 to April 26, 2012) Iwate, Miyagi, Yamagata, Fukushima, Ibaraki, Tochigi, Gunma, Chiba prefecture as the target JASMES: Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) *The parts indicated in white and demarcated with solid lines on the map indicate areas that are covered with snow, and deposition amounts of radioactive cesium in these areas and the surrounding areas may possibly be lower than when there was no snow coverage due to shielding by the snow.

Attachment 8 Results of the Airborne Monitoring Survey Outside 80 km from the (Deposition amount of cesium 137 on the ground surface) (As of May 7,2012) Accumulation of Cs-137 (Bq/m 2 ) Compensated value as of May 7, 2012 Area of snow coverage (March 26 to April 26, 2012) Iwate, Miyagi, Yamagata, Fukushima, Ibaraki, Tochigi, Gunma, Chiba prefecture as the target JASMES: Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) *The parts indicated in white and demarcated with solid lines on the map indicate areas that are covered with snow, and deposition amounts of radioactive cesium in these areas and the surrounding areas may possibly be lower than when there was no snow coverage due to shielding by the snow.

Comparison between the results of the fourth airborne monitoring survey (air dose rates) and those of the fifth airborne monitoring survey (air dose rates) Attachment 9 9 In order to confirm the changing trends in air dose rates, the measurement results of the fourth airborne monitoring survey (air dose rates) (as of November 5, 2011) and those of the fifth airborne monitoring survey (air dose rates) (as of June 28, 2012) were compared. Although the comparison showed differences in the changes of air dose rates in the measured areas, it was confirmed that in the areas within a 80km radius of the, the air dose rates had decreased by around 23% during the period (just under 8 months) between the fourth airborne monitoring survey and the fifth airborne monitoring survey. As the decrease in air dose rates due to the decay of radioactive cesium during the same period was around 14%, it has been confirmed that as a trend, the decrease in air dose rates was higher than the decay of radioactive cesium in the areas within a 80km radius of the. Airborne Monitoring; Image of differences in air dose rate (Results of the fifth airborne monitoring Results of the fourth airborne monitoring) Fifth airborne monitoring survey (June 26, 2012) The trend is that air dose rates had decreased by 23% during a period just under 8 months in the areas within a 80km radius of the Areas where readings were not obtained Figure: Distribution of differences between the results of the fourth airborne monitoring survey (air dose rates) and those of the fifth airborne monitoring survey (air dose rates) Fourth airborne monitoring survey (November 5, 2011) Figure: Relationship between the results of the fourth airborne monitoring survey (air dose rates) and those of the fifth airborne monitoring survey (air dose rates)

Reference 1 Results of the Airborne Monitoring Survey (Air dose rates at the height of 1m above the ground surface) (As of June 28, 2012) (The results for airborne monitoring survey outside 80km from the *1 were added to the results of the fifth airborne monitoring survey) Air dose rate over 1 meter above ground level ( Sv/h) Compensated value as of June28, 2012 Areas where readings were not obtained Area of snow coverage (March 26 to April 26, 2012) Iwate, Miyagi, Yamagata, Fukushima, Ibaraki, Tochigi, Gunma, Chiba prefecture as the target JASMES: Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) The results for outside 80km from the on May 7, 2012, were decay-compensated on June 28, 2012. *1: The measurement results for outside 80km from the were decay-compensated to the value for the measurement results at the time of the fifth airborne monitoring (as of June 28, 2012.) The effects of the transition of radioactive materials due to environmental circumstances, such as wind and rain, were not considered. *2:The parts indicated in white and demarcated with solid lines on the map indicate areas that are covered with snow, and air dose rates in these areas and the surrounding areas may possibly be lower than when there was no snow coverage due to shielding by the snow. *3 This map contains air dose rates by natural radionuclides.

Referance 2 Results of the Airborne Monitoring Survey (Total deposition amount of cesium 134 and cesium 137 on the ground surface) (As of June 28, 2012) (The results for airborne monitoring survey outside 80km from the *1 were added to the results of the fifth airborne monitoring survey) Total accumulation of Cs-134 and Cs-137 (Bq/m 2 ) Compensated value as of June 28, 2012 Areas where readings were not obtained Area of snow coverage (March 26 to April 26, 2012) Iwate, Miyagi, Yamagata, Fukushima, Ibaraki, Tochigi, Gunma, Chiba prefecture as the target JASMES: Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) The results for outside 80km from the on May 7, 2012, were decay-compensated on June 28, 2012. *1: The measurement results for outside 80km from the were decay-compensated to the value for the measurement results at the time of the fifth airborne monitoring (as of June 28, 2012.) The effects of the transition of radioactive materials due to environmental circumstances, such as wind and rain, were not considered. *2: The parts indicated in white and demarcated with solid lines on the map indicate areas that are covered with snow, and deposition amounts of radioactive cesium in these areas and the surrounding areas may possibly be lower than when there was no snow coverage due to shielding by the snow.

Reference 3 Results of the Airborne Monitoring Survey (Deposition amount of cesium 134 on the ground surface) (As of June 28, 2012) (The results for airborne monitoring survey outside 80km from the *1 were added to the results of the fifth airborne monitoring survey) Accumulation of Cs-134 (Bq/m 2 ) Compensated value as of June 28, 2012 Areas where readings were not obtained Area of snow coverage (March 26 to April 26, 2012) Iwate, Miyagi, Yamagata, Fukushima, Ibaraki, Tochigi, Gunma, Chiba prefecture as the target JASMES: Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) The results for outside 80km from the on May 7, 2012, were decay-compensated on June 28, 2012. *1: The measurement results for outside 80km from the were decay-compensated to the value for the measurement results at the time of the fifth airborne monitoring (as of June 28, 2012.) The effects of the transition of radioactive materials due to environmental circumstances, such as wind and rain, were not considered. *2: The parts indicated in white and demarcated with solid lines on the map indicate areas that are covered with snow, and deposition amounts of radioactive cesium in these areas and the surrounding areas may possibly be lower than when there was no snow coverage due to shielding by the snow.

Reference 4 Results of the Airborne Monitoring Survey (Deposition amount of cesium 137 on the ground surface) (As of June 28, 2012) (The results for airborne monitoring survey outside 80km from the *1 were added to the results of the fifth airborne monitoring survey) Accumulation of Cs-137 (Bq/m 2 ) Compensated value as of June 28, 2012 Areas where readings were not obtained Area of snow coverage (March 26 to April 26, 2012) Iwate, Miyagi, Yamagata, Fukushima, Ibaraki, Tochigi, Gunma, Chiba prefecture as the target JASMES: Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) The results for outside 80km from the on May 7, 2012, were decay-compensated on June 28, 2012. *1: The measurement results for outside 80km from the were decay-compensated to the value for the measurement results at the time of the fifth airborne monitoring (as of June 28, 2012.) The effects of the transition of radioactive materials due to environmental circumstances, such as wind and rain, were not considered. *2: The parts indicated in white and demarcated with solid lines on the map indicate areas that are covered with snow, and deposition amounts of radioactive cesium in these areas and the surrounding areas may possibly be lower than when there was no snow coverage due to shielding by the snow.

(Reference 5) Details on the Conditions in Creating the Distribution Maps of Air Dose Rate and Radioactive Cesium on the Soil Surface that Utilizes the Survey Results of the Fifth Airborne Monitoring Survey and Airborne Monitoring Survey in Areas Outside 80 km From the The flight altitude for this monitoring survey was around 300m from the ground, and the measurement value is the average of the measurement values within a circle of around 600 m in diameter (changes depending on flight altitude) under the aircraft. The width of the flight path of the aircraft is around 1.85 km in the fifth airborne monitoring, and around 3 km for the airborne monitoring outside 80 km from the. In order to prepare distribution maps of air dose rates, we first obtained the relationship between counting rates (cps) measured by airborne survey above the test line established at each of the monitoring areas and air dose rates (μsv/h) at the height of 1 m above the ground measured around the test line using NaI scintillators, and then calculated air dose rates at the height of 1 m above the ground using counting rates measured by airborne survey above respective measuring points. Maps showing deposition amounts of radioactive cesium were prepared by first assessing the characteristics of the energy spectra of gamma rays measured in the air by type of helicopter and measuring equipment used, and then sorting out areas where the energy spectra of radioactive cesium (Cs-134 and Cs-137) were detected significantly and those were they were not (for details on this method, refer to Attachment 9 of Results of Airborne Monitoring Survey by MEXT in the Kyushu Region and Okinawa Prefecture [Announced on May 11, 2012]). The details are as follows: (i) Areas where the energy spectra of radioactive cesium were detected significantly In order to calculate the amount of radioactive cesium in detail, we used the method for conducting detailed assessment of the influence of natural radionuclides based on the energy spectra of gamma rays measured in the sky that were applied in western Japan and Hokkaido. Based on this method, deposition amounts of radioactive cesium were calculated by deducting the contribution by natural radionuclides from the measurement results of air dose rates at respective measuring points, and also based on the correlation between air dose rates and the results of the in-situ measurement* using germanium semiconductor detectors, which was conducted by the Japan Chemical Analysis

Center in the course of the project by the 2011 Strategic Funds for the Promotion of Science and Technology, entitled Establishment of the Base for Taking Measures for Environmental Impact of Radioactive Substances Study on Distribution of Radioactive Substances (June August, 2011). * In-situ measurement using germanium semiconductor detectors: A means to analyze the concentration of radionuclides accumulated in soil by setting up transportable germanium semiconductor detectors in the environment and detecting gamma rays that are emitted from radiation sources distributed in soil. (ii) Areas where the energy spectra of radioactive cesium were not detected significantly As with before, these were indicated on maps as areas showing the minimum range of radioactive cesium ( 10kBq/m 2 ) for the sake of simplicity.