State of CESM. Jean-François Lamarque. CESM Chief Scientist NCAR. Breckenridge June Jean-François Lamarque.

Similar documents
Atmospheric composition in the Community Earth System Model (CESM)

CESM1.5 simulations since Mini-Breck

Update on CAM and the AMWG. Recent activities and near-term priorities. by the AMWG

Rich Neale, Peter Caldwell, Christiane Jablonowski and Cecile Hannay

State of WACCM. A. Gettelman, L. M. Polvani, M. Mills + WACCM Team

Susan Bates Ocean Model Working Group Science Liaison

CAM6/CESM2 development simulations Cécile Hannay, Rich Neale, Pete Bogenschutz, Julio Bacmeister, Andrew Gettelman, and Joe Tribbia

Results from CAM-SE AMIP and coupled simulations

Standalone simulations: CAM3, CAM4 and CAM5

CESM2 (WACCM6): Stratospheric Evaluation

The Art of Tuning and Coupling: A peek behind the scenes of CESM development. Cécile Hannay CAM science liaison AMP-CGD

Overview of Energy Exascale Earth System Model (E3SM) a new model from US Department of Energy from Ruby Leung, E3SM Chief Scientist

How not to build a Model: Coupling Cloud Parameterizations Across Scales. Andrew Gettelman, NCAR

Atmospheric modeling in the Climate System. Joe Tribbia NCAR.ESSL.CGD.AMP

Ice Sheet Modeling and Sea Level Rise. William Lipscomb, NCAR CESM Sea Level Session 10 January 2018

NCAR(CESM) Center Report

The Community Earth System Model State of the CESM. June, 2012

Tropical Cyclones and precipitation in 25 Km CAM4 and CAM5

Example Biases and Development Needs for CESM

SC-WACCM! and! Problems with Specifying the Ozone Hole

CESM1-WACCM: Comparison with CCSM4/ CESM CMIP5 simulations

Ice sheet freshwater forcing

! An Update on CAM-CLUBB Coupled Simulations

The Cryosphere Radiative Effect in CESM. Justin Perket Mark Flanner CESM Polar Climate Working Group Meeting Wednesday June 19, 2013

Seasonal forecasting activities at ECMWF

A Unified Convection Scheme : UNICON

High-Resolution MPAS Simulations for Analysis of Climate Change Effects on Weather Extremes

Radiative Convective Equilibrium in Single Column CAM. I Kuan Hu, Brian Mapes, Richard Neale, and Andrew Gettelman 22 nd CESM Workshop

NCAR Unified Community Atmosphere Modeling Roadmap

Ice sheet climate in CESM

Introduction to the Community Earth System Model

CESM: A platform for atmospheric prediction from the surface to geospace

Seasonality of the Jet Response to Arctic Warming

Arctic climate projections and progress towards a new CCSM. Marika Holland NCAR

Photo courtesy National Geographic

WP 4 Testing Arctic sea ice predictability in NorESM

Tropical cyclone simulations and predictions with GFDL s prototype global cloud resolving model

Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model (WACCM) and Its Thermosphere/Ionosphere Extension (WACCM-X)

Can dust cause droughts?

Sensitivity to the CAM candidate schemes in climate and forecast runs along the Pacific Cross-section

Multi-scale Arctic prediction with MPAS-CESM

A Unified Convection Scheme, UNICON

The Arctic Energy Budget

The Regional Arctic System Model (RASM) for Studying High Resolution Climate Changes in the Arctic

Jordan G. Powers Kevin W. Manning. Mesoscale and Microscale Meteorology Laboratory National Center for Atmospheric Research Boulder, Colorado, USA

Interpre'ng Model Results

(1) Arctic Sea Ice Predictability,

Changing predictability characteristics of Arctic sea ice in a warming climate

Assessing the impact of Arctic sea ice variability on Greenland Ice Sheet surface mass and energy exchange

Short Term forecasts along the GCSS Pacific Cross-section: Evaluating new Parameterizations in the Community Atmospheric Model

Global climate predictions: forecast drift and bias adjustment issues

Exploring the Use of Dynamical Weather and Climate Models for Risk Assessment

Linkages between Arctic sea ice loss and midlatitude

Introduction to Climate ~ Part I ~

Extreme, transient Moisture Transport in the high-latitude North Atlantic sector and Impacts on Sea-ice concentration:

Polar WRF. Polar Meteorology Group Byrd Polar and Climate Research Center The Ohio State University Columbus Ohio

ECMWF: Weather and Climate Dynamical Forecasts

How well do we know the climatological characteristics of the North Atlantic jet stream? Isla Simpson, CAS, CDG, NCAR

Today s Lecture: Land, biosphere, cryosphere (All that stuff we don t have equations for... )

What governs the location of the Southern Ocean deep winter mixing in CESM

IITM Earth System Model (IITM ESM)

Characterization of the Present-Day Arctic Atmosphere in CCSM4

Worrying about Snow. Ed B-W, UW, Seattle with CC Bitz. Thanks to NCAR (Jen Kay, PCWG)

A new century-long high-resolution global climate run using the Community Earth System Model.

Presentation Overview. Southwestern Climate: Past, present and future. Global Energy Balance. What is climate?

Assessing recent declines in Upper Rio Grande River runoff efficiency from a paleoclimate perspective

Geophysical Research Letters. Supporting Information for

WACCM: State of the Model

Simulations of Lake Processes within a Regional Climate Model

SPECIAL PROJECT PROGRESS REPORT

Possible Applications of Deep Neural Networks in Climate and Weather. David M. Hall Assistant Research Professor Dept. Computer Science, CU Boulder

Scale-aware and definition-aware evaluation of CESM1 near-surface precipitation frequency using CloudSat observations

UKESM1 developments and plans for CMIP6

Torres del Paine, Patagonia, Chile

Sea Ice Update. Marika Holland and David Bailey. National Center for Atmospheric Research. CESM Workshop. University of Toronto

(c) (a) (d) (b) JJA DJF. V850 Hulu Cave. V850 Hulu Cave V1000 V1000. Dongge Cave. Dongge Cave. Lake Huguang Maar.

Fully-Coupled and Forced Ocean Sea-Ice Simulations Towards CESM2 (since mini-breck) Defining the Ocean Component of CESM2

ENSO Outlook by JMA. Hiroyuki Sugimoto. El Niño Monitoring and Prediction Group Climate Prediction Division Japan Meteorological Agency

Using DART Tools for CAM Development

Marla Meehl Manager of NCAR/UCAR Networking and Front Range GigaPoP (FRGP)

Will a warmer world change Queensland s rainfall?

Climate Modeling in a Changed World

Analysis of the Hydrologic Cycle in the Community Atmosphere Model

AMPS Update June 2017

ALASKA REGION CLIMATE OUTLOOK BRIEFING. November 16, 2018 Rick Thoman Alaska Center for Climate Assessment and Policy

Investigate the influence of the Amazon rainfall on westerly wind anomalies and the 2002 Atlantic Nino using QuikScat, Altimeter and TRMM data

SPECIAL PROJECT PROGRESS REPORT

Development of the Atmospheric Component of the Next Generation GFDL Climate Model

Arctic System Reanalysis Provides Highresolution Accuracy for Arctic Studies

Atmospheric Modeling I: Physics in the Community Atmosphere Model (CAM)

Tropical cyclones and seasonal means in high-resolution CAM 5 runs.

General Circulation. Nili Harnik DEES, Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory

Climate Modeling: From the global to the regional scale

China ESM Developments in the past year

Aquaplanet warming experiments with CAM: a tale of the subtropics

Land data assimilation in the NASA GEOS-5 system: Status and challenges

Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis

SST forcing of Australian rainfall trends

Arctic Change and Possible Influence on Midlatitude Climate and Weather. Workshop Summary

SPECIAL PROJECT PROGRESS REPORT

Transcription:

State of CESM CESM Chief Scientist NCAR

Community support CESM Tutorial: 10-14 August 2015 Led by C. Shields Approx. 80 participants CESM Tutorial: 8-12 August 2016 Led by A. Philips and S. Bates Made possible through DOE and NSF funding! Adding approx. 900 registered users per year DiscussCESM: 35,000 User sessions May 1, 2015 - YTD 21,000 Returning user sessions May 1, 2015 - YTD 18,500 New User sessions May 1, 2015 - YTD

BRACE: Benefits of Reduced Anthropogenic Climate change Explore differences in physical and societal impacts between RCP8.5 and RCP4.5 using CESM ensembles 21 papers, special issue of Climatic Change (in progress) 50+ participants, from NCAR and 18 other institutions Avoided Impacts Biophysical & Societal Impact Models Health Ag. and Land use Heat extremes Tropical cyclones Drought Sea-level rise

Decadal prediction Predicted rate of global warming from 2013 initial year greater than during early-2000s slowdown and greater than uninitialized: Observed 2001-2014: +0.08±0.05 C/decade Predicted 2013-2022: +0.22±0.13 C/decade Uninitialized 2013-2022: +0.14±0.12 C/decade (Meehl et al., 2016, Nature Communications) With funding from DOE RGCM program

ROAD TO CESM2

Timeline for CESM2 (as of June 2015) Spring 2015 June 2015 Oct 1 2015 Spring 2016 June 2016 Decision on CAM5.5 CAM5.5 to developers Coupled simulations Coupled simulations CESM2 FV-1 o Interim versions of CLM5 POP2 CICE5 BGC Chemistry WACCM Others All components for FV-1 o frozen by Oct. 1 2015 CAM6 development (SE dycore) Code delivery Potential code delivery Potential code development AMWG meeting in Jan-Feb 2016 to freeze CAM6 Coupled simulations CESM2 SE-1/4 o Assembling and optimizing coupled model

Where we were in Feb. 2016 4-day all-wgs meeting in Boulder Had generated 100+ year control and 20 th century simulation w/ intermediate configurations Identified 3 main areas of strong concern > Amazon precipitation > Surface wind over ice sheet > Arctic ocean warming at depth

Amazon problem

Bias Auto ORG ORG (adv) Mom Cu low capeten mm/day Tiedke=0.5K Cloud_ent Modification minus Control Slide from R. Neale

Obs. (TRMM/NCEP) 20-100-day band pass filtered fields Lag correlation of rainfall (colors) and 850- mb zonal wind (contours) with rainfall at 90E Improved MJO in response to convection buoyancy change (capeten) CAM5.5+Capeten CAM5.5

Reduced surface biases for ice sheets CESM2 can now generate a realistic surface mass balance for either Greenland or Antarctica. However, surface melting is sensitive to snow physics. Still working on uniform physics that gives good results for both ice sheets. Surface winds over both ice sheets are much improved. CAM still generates too much liquid precipitation in cold regions. Run 36 10 m wind speed (m/s) over the Greenland ice sheet. Left: Run 36, with turbulent mountain stress. Right: Run 79, with Beljaars form drag. Far right: RACMO2.3 regional model. Run 79 RACMO

Arctic ocean bias: not much improvement Control: Feb. 2016 Modif.: only ocean changes Improvements in Ocean Physics Parameterizations Reduce Denitrification, Improving the Global Ocean Nitrogen Balance

Overall score Black: Large Ensemble Red: CESM2

Where we are now: Nearing completion of ALL components Targeted coupled issues identified in Feb. CESM2 is improved over LENS Additional work going on Secondary-organic aerosols Land optimization

Exploration of CLM5 parameters Latent Heat (perturbation from default) Wm^-2-10 10 0 high low high low

Where we are now: Nearing completion of ALL components Targeted coupled issues identified in Feb. CESM2 is improved over LENS Additional work going on Secondary-organic aerosols Land optimization Performance optimization (20+ sypd!)

Stratospheric AOD at Northern Mid-Latitudes Prognostic stratospheric aerosols with volcanic SO 2 database match lidar observations much better than existing climatologies.

Sea-ice issue in very recent experiments

Timeline until release Feb 2016 Mar. 1 2016 June 2016 Jul. 1 2016 Sep. 1 2016 Dec 2016 WG meetings All WGs define -final additions -timeline CESM2 Sessions at Breckenridge Definition of CESM2 Code available through developers access Document impacts in coupled simulations Code Freeze CESM2.0 Release -Full release, incl. WACCMX and simpler models -CMIP6 1 o Start CMIP6 simulations

Upcoming CSL proposal: 2016-2018 Proposal will be due in mid Sept. 2016 Expected targets: 2017: 3x (330M core-hours: Yellowstone + Cheyenne) 2018: 2x (220M core-hours: Cheyenne) Use CSL Yellowstone allocation (110M) with supplement (in discussion with CISL) to cover CMIP6 DECK and Tier 1 1-degree runs Use Cheyenne for everything else, including highresolution CMIP6 simulations

CMIP Analysis Platform Up and running: https://www2.cisl.ucar.edu/resources/cmipanalysis-platform Tutorial (20 students and early-career scientists) scheduled for Aug. 16-18: agenda and registration available at link above Will be a critical component to support CMIP6 analysis (combined with LENS, LME, ME, )

Ocean Issue #1: POP is no longer being supported by LANL (has been used since CCSM2!) Issue #2: Not state-of-the-art anymore Opportunity to identify > New model framework > New mode of development and collaboration Has been discussed at Feb. OMWG meeting and Ocean Sciences (New Orleans) RFI sent to 6 groups (MOM6, MPAS-O, HYCOM, ROMS, MITgcm, and NEMO); all responded and will participate in the discussions

Participation to MIPs

Challenges to CESM Maintain flexibility with a increasingly complex code (simpler models, stand-alone configurations, multiple physics, ) Code must run efficiently on multiple platforms Maintain multiple configurations (incl. resolution) but focus on a limited set of scientifically supported versions Enable community model development

Staging simulations for PI control 1. Use WACCM (F-case) to generate fields for CAM -> WACCM run with CMIP6 1850 specifications 2. Start CAM from Levitus and WACCM from stabilized climate Levitus CAM new forcings Land initialization Ocean BGC initialization CAM Stabilized climate WACCM new forcings WACCM-SC WACCM Stabil. Land initialization Ocean BGC initialization

CMIP6

DECK experiments CMIP6 cost estimate 1850 control: 1000 years Instantaneous 4xCO 2 : 150 years 1% to 4x: 150 years AMIP (1979-2015): 36 years Historical simulation: 165 years (3 members) Tier 1 experiments, as requested in MIP documents + ScenarioMIP Tier 2 ensemble

CMIP6 DECK + Tier 1 Requirements 1 o versions CAM: 5,000 years CAM-BGC: 12,000 WACCM-BGC: 5,600 Total cost: 250M core-hours 1/4 o resolution version CAM: 1,500 years Total cost: 250M core-hours Total I/O: 5PB (very rough estimate) Yellowstone core-hours; 1 year 700M core-hours 1) A lot of interesting science resides in Tier 2/3 experiments 2) A large unknown is cost of highresolution model.

CESM/CMIP6 Workflow Motivation: To increase the workflow performance in preparation for CMIP6 CMIP5 CMIP6 Simulation Cost ~13M corehours ~500M corehours Raw Size 2 PB 20-30* PB Published Size 175 TB 5* PB Time Line 18 Months 12-24 Months New Tools Available: PyReshaper: Converts time-slice files to time-series files approximately 13 6.5 times faster PyAverager: Creates climatology files about 140 times faster Diagnostics: Creates diagnostic plots about 5 times faster than the serial method Tools Currently in Development: *=rough estimate PyConform (Python Climate Output Formatter): Will replace the CMORization step. It will interpolate (vertical and horizontal), perform automatic unit conversion, add required attributes, perform validation checks, and perform calculations. Workflow Automation and Management: Automate the workflow and sync with the Run Database

BEYOND CESM2 (2017-2020)

Atmosphere Multiple dynamical cores available > MPAS (non-hydrostatic) > Spectral Element (currently used for highresolution) > Planning on a Evaluation process similar to CLUBB/UNICON

Where we were a year ago Model CAM4 CCSM4 CAM5.1 CESM1.0.3 CAM5.3 CESM1.2.0 Release Apr 2010 June 2011 June 2013 PBL HB UW UW Shallow conv. Hack UW UW Deep conv. ZM ZM ZM Microphysics RK MG MG Macrophysics RK Park Park Radiation CAMRT RRTMG RRTMG Aerosols BAM MAM3 MAM3 Dynamics FV FV SE CAM5.4 May 2015 UW UW ZM MG2 Park RRTMG MAM4 FV CAM5.5 June 2015 CLUBB CLUBB ZM MG2 CLUBB RRTMG MAM4 FV http://www.cesm.ucar.edu/working_groups/atmosphere/development/cam6/cam5.5_panel_rec_jun15.pdf http://www.cesm.ucar.edu/working_groups/atmosphere/development/cam6/cam5.5-process/ = New parameterization/dynamics