Analysis of Variance. Read Chapter 14 and Sections to review one-way ANOVA.

Similar documents
PLSC PRACTICE TEST ONE

CHAPTER 4 Analysis of Variance. One-way ANOVA Two-way ANOVA i) Two way ANOVA without replication ii) Two way ANOVA with replication

Unit 12: Analysis of Single Factor Experiments

Summary of Chapter 7 (Sections ) and Chapter 8 (Section 8.1)

QUEEN MARY, UNIVERSITY OF LONDON

One-way ANOVA (Single-Factor CRD)

22s:152 Applied Linear Regression. Take random samples from each of m populations.

ANOVA CIVL 7012/8012

Analysis of Variance: Part 1

STAT Chapter 10: Analysis of Variance

Lecture 7: Hypothesis Testing and ANOVA

Lec 1: An Introduction to ANOVA

What is Experimental Design?

STAT 135 Lab 9 Multiple Testing, One-Way ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis

Multiple comparisons The problem with the one-pair-at-a-time approach is its error rate.

Topic 22 Analysis of Variance

The legacy of Sir Ronald A. Fisher. Fisher s three fundamental principles: local control, replication, and randomization.

Chapter 10. Design of Experiments and Analysis of Variance

DESAIN EKSPERIMEN Analysis of Variances (ANOVA) Semester Genap 2017/2018 Jurusan Teknik Industri Universitas Brawijaya

Multiple Linear Regression

22s:152 Applied Linear Regression. There are a couple commonly used models for a one-way ANOVA with m groups. Chapter 8: ANOVA

Confidence Intervals, Testing and ANOVA Summary

Design of Experiments. Factorial experiments require a lot of resources

Factorial Treatment Structure: Part I. Lukas Meier, Seminar für Statistik

One-way ANOVA. Experimental Design. One-way ANOVA

20.0 Experimental Design

Biostatistics 270 Kruskal-Wallis Test 1. Kruskal-Wallis Test

Design & Analysis of Experiments 7E 2009 Montgomery

Comparing Several Means: ANOVA

Analysis of Variance

STAT 135 Lab 10 Two-Way ANOVA, Randomized Block Design and Friedman s Test

Chapter 8: Regression Models with Qualitative Predictors

Two-Way Factorial Designs

Dr. Junchao Xia Center of Biophysics and Computational Biology. Fall /8/2016 1/38

Chapter 12. Analysis of variance

ANOVA (Analysis of Variance) output RLS 11/20/2016

STAT 115:Experimental Designs

Analysis of Variance

Permutation Tests. Noa Haas Statistics M.Sc. Seminar, Spring 2017 Bootstrap and Resampling Methods

Exam details. Final Review Session. Things to Review

Lec 5: Factorial Experiment

Math 423/533: The Main Theoretical Topics

What If There Are More Than. Two Factor Levels?

Sleep data, two drugs Ch13.xls

STAT22200 Spring 2014 Chapter 8A

1. The (dependent variable) is the variable of interest to be measured in the experiment.

The One-Way Repeated-Measures ANOVA. (For Within-Subjects Designs)

Addition of Center Points to a 2 k Designs Section 6-6 page 271

Finding Relationships Among Variables

Parametric versus Nonparametric Statistics-when to use them and which is more powerful? Dr Mahmoud Alhussami

Lecture 10. Factorial experiments (2-way ANOVA etc)

Advanced Experimental Design

Multiple comparisons - subsequent inferences for two-way ANOVA

Multiple Pairwise Comparison Procedures in One-Way ANOVA with Fixed Effects Model

18.S096 Problem Set 3 Fall 2013 Regression Analysis Due Date: 10/8/2013

Introduction. Chapter 8

Interactions and Factorial ANOVA

Interactions and Factorial ANOVA

Stat/F&W Ecol/Hort 572 Review Points Ané, Spring 2010

" M A #M B. Standard deviation of the population (Greek lowercase letter sigma) σ 2

1 One-way Analysis of Variance

PSYC 331 STATISTICS FOR PSYCHOLOGISTS

20.1. Balanced One-Way Classification Cell means parametrization: ε 1. ε I. + ˆɛ 2 ij =

Review for Final. Chapter 1 Type of studies: anecdotal, observational, experimental Random sampling

Group comparison test for independent samples

Orthogonal contrasts for a 2x2 factorial design Example p130

Fractional Factorial Designs

One-Way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)

Formal Statement of Simple Linear Regression Model

Process/product optimization using design of experiments and response surface methodology

Unit 27 One-Way Analysis of Variance


ANOVA Randomized Block Design

More about Single Factor Experiments

STA 111: Probability & Statistical Inference

Residual Analysis for two-way ANOVA The twoway model with K replicates, including interaction,

Extending the Robust Means Modeling Framework. Alyssa Counsell, Phil Chalmers, Matt Sigal, Rob Cribbie

Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) Cancer Research UK 10 th of May 2018 D.-L. Couturier / R. Nicholls / M. Fernandes

Tentative solutions TMA4255 Applied Statistics 16 May, 2015

Chapter 7, continued: MANOVA

Chemometrics. Matti Hotokka Physical chemistry Åbo Akademi University

Analysis Of Variance Compiled by T.O. Antwi-Asare, U.G

Bivariate Relationships Between Variables

STAT Section 5.8: Block Designs

Lecture notes 13: ANOVA (a.k.a. Analysis of Variance)

3. Design Experiments and Variance Analysis

STAT 135 Lab 11 Tests for Categorical Data (Fisher s Exact test, χ 2 tests for Homogeneity and Independence) and Linear Regression

INTRODUCTION TO DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF EXPERIMENTS

Statistiek II. John Nerbonne using reworkings by Hartmut Fitz and Wilbert Heeringa. February 13, Dept of Information Science

Six Sigma Black Belt Study Guides

Remedial Measures, Brown-Forsythe test, F test

BALANCED INCOMPLETE BLOCK DESIGNS

PLS205 Lab 2 January 15, Laboratory Topic 3

* Tuesday 17 January :30-16:30 (2 hours) Recored on ESSE3 General introduction to the course.

21.0 Two-Factor Designs

STAT 430 (Fall 2017): Tutorial 8

A discussion on multiple regression models

1-Way ANOVA MATH 143. Spring Department of Mathematics and Statistics Calvin College

Statistics GIDP Ph.D. Qualifying Exam Methodology

Notes for Week 13 Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) continued WEEK 13 page 1

Transcription:

Analysis of Variance Read Chapter 14 and Sections 15.1-15.2 to review one-way ANOVA. Design of an experiment the process of planning an experiment to insure that an appropriate analysis is possible. Some important steps 1. Statement of experimental objectives. 2. Statement of how much information is required about the relevant parameters. 3. Selection of an experimental design. 4. Selection of an appropriate analysis and sample size. 100

Definitions Experimental unit the basic unit on which a measurement is made. Factors different sets of conditions to which the experimental units are subjected. Any factor will have at least two different levels. Treatment a specific combination of the levels of the different factors. The number of experimental units on which a particular treatment is applied is called the number of replications of that treatment. Quantitative factor a factor whose levels correspond to a numerical (at least ordinal) scale. Qualitative factor a factor whose levels correspond to a nominal-level scale. 101

Example A chemist wants to determine the effect of air exposure time and relative humidity on the weight loss of a 5 gram portion of a compound. Four different exposure times and the relative humidities 0.20, 0.30 and 0.40 were of interest. In addition, weight loss was determined by three different analysts. An experimental unit is a single 5 gram portion of compound. The experiment has three factors: exposure time, a quantitative variable with four levels, relative humidity, a quantitative variable with three levels, and analyst, a qualitative variable with three levels. The number of treatments in this experiment is 4 3 3 = 36. If multiple replications of a given treatment are done, what might cause variation in the results? 102

Randomization Formal idea of randomization introduced by R.A. Fisher in 1930 s. Suppose we re comparing two treatments. The treatments are to be applied to 16 distinct experimental units. Ideal case: The experimental units are identical in every respect. Simply assign Treatment 1 to any of the 8 units and Treatment 2 to the other 8. Case requiring complete randomization: The experimental units are known to differ in some way, but it isn t possible to distinguish among them. Randomly assign Treatment 1 to 8 units and Treatment 2 103

to the other 8. This is a reasonable way to ensure that, with high likelihood, the two treatments are applied to groups of experimental units with similar mixes of characteristics. Note: It s probably wise to use randomization even in the ideal case, to guard against unanticipated differences between units. Blocking: Suppose the 16 experimental units are different in an obvious way, but can be arranged into four categories, or blocks, such that the four units within a block are similar. For each block, randomly assign Treatment 1 to two units and Treatment 2 to the other two. 104

Completely Randomized Design (CRD) In a CRD, one randomly assigns n 1, n 2,..., n t experimental units to treatments 1, 2,..., t, respectively. CRD is equivalent to selecting t random samples, one from each of t populations, in such a way that the samples are independent of each other. The n i responses to treatment i represent a random sample from a population of possible responses. After a treatment has been applied to an experimental unit, a response or measurement is recorded from that unit. We denote the jth response from the ith treatment by X ij, j = 1, 2,..., n i, i = 1, 2,..., t. 105

Data Structure Total Mean Trt. 1 X 11 X 1n1 X 1 X 1 = X 1 /n 1 Trt. 2 X 21 X 2n2 X 2 X 2 = X 2 /n 2.... Trt. t X t1 X tnt X t X t = X t /n t X X = X /N N = n 1 + n 2 + + n t Important decomposition X ij = X + ( X i X) + (X ij X i ) X: Grand mean X i X: Deviation due to treatment X ij X i : Residual, or deviation due to differences among experimental units 106

Parametric analog of previous decomposition X ij = µ + α i + ɛ ij, i = 1, 2,..., t, j = 1,..., n i. µ: a constant common to all X ij s α i : a constant representing the effect due to treatment i ɛ ij : a random variable representing an error term, i.e., error due to differences among experimental units Usual assumptions about errors: 1. Each ɛ ij has a normal distribution with mean 0 and variance σ 2. 2. All the error terms are independent of each other. 107

Decomposition of sums of squares For each observation, X ij X = ( X i X) + (X ij X i ). The sum of all (X ij X) 2 is called T SS, for total sum of squares. T SS = (X ij X) 2 i,j Define SS T and SS E by SS T = i n i ( X i X) 2 and SS E = i,j (X ij X i ) 2. Important identity T SS = SS T + SS E 108

Testing for no treatment effect Of central importance in the CRD is testing the hypothesis of no treatment effect, which in parametric terms is H 0 : α 1 = α 2 = = α t = 0. The alternative hypothesis is H 1 : α i 0 for at least one i. Define MS T = SS T t 1 and MS E = SS E n t. We test H 0 vs. H 1 using the F -statistic F = MS T /MS E. H 0 is rejected at level of significance α if F F t 1,n t,α. 109