Equation of State of Dense Matter

Similar documents
Nuclear symmetry energy and Neutron star cooling

8 Nuclei. introduc)on to Astrophysics, C. Bertulani, Texas A&M-Commerce 1

Density dependence of the nuclear symmetry energy estimated from neutron skin thickness in finite nuclei

Density dependence of the nuclear symmetry energy estimated from neutron skin thickness in finite nuclei

An EOS implementation for astrophyisical simulations

Symmetry Energy Constraints From Neutron Stars and Experiment

The liquid drop model

Nuclear & Particle Physics of Compact Stars

Nuclear Matter Incompressibility and Giant Monopole Resonances

An extended liquid drop approach

RFSS: Lecture 2 Nuclear Properties

E. Fermi: Notes on Thermodynamics and Statistics (1953))

Fermi gas model. Introduction to Nuclear Science. Simon Fraser University Spring NUCS 342 February 2, 2011

Pb, 120 Sn and 48 Ca from High-Resolution Proton Scattering MSU 2016

Finite Range Force models for EOS

Crust-core transitions in neutron stars revisited

The Complete APR Equation of State

3. Introductory Nuclear Physics 1; The Liquid Drop Model

Theory of neutron-rich nuclei and nuclear radii Witold Nazarewicz (with Paul-Gerhard Reinhard) PREX Workshop, JLab, August 17-19, 2008

What did you learn in the last lecture?

Neutron star structure explored with a family of unified equations of state of neutron star matter

Neutron Stars. J.M. Lattimer. Department of Physics & Astronomy Stony Brook University. 25 July 2011

The role of isospin symmetry in collective nuclear structure. Symposium in honour of David Warner

Nuclear radii of unstable nuclei -neutron/proton skins and halos-

Liquid-Gas Phase Transition of Supernova Matter and Its Relation to Nucleosynthesis

Introductory Nuclear Physics. Glatzmaier and Krumholz 7 Prialnik 4 Pols 6 Clayton 4.1, 4.4

Nuclear matter EoS including few-nucleon correlations

Stability of heavy elements against alpha and cluster radioactivity

Symmetry Energy. in Structure and in Central and Direct Reactions

Neutron Rich Nuclei in Heaven and Earth

Nuclear Astrophysics

The nucleus and its structure

Lecture 2. The Semi Empirical Mass Formula SEMF. 2.0 Overview

Reactions of neutron-rich Sn isotopes investigated at relativistic energies at R 3 B

Heavy-ion reactions and the Nuclear Equation of State

Nuclear Binding Energy in Terms of a Redefined (A)symmetry Energy

13. Basic Nuclear Properties

c E If photon Mass particle 8-1

Symmetry Energy in Surface

Clusters in Dense Matter and the Equation of State

Equation-of-State of Nuclear Matter with Light Clusters

Krane Enge Cohen Willaims NUCLEAR PROPERTIES 1 Binding energy and stability Semi-empirical mass formula Ch 4

1 Introduction. 2 The hadronic many body problem

Nuclear Equation of State for High Density Matter. Matthias Hempel, Basel University NuPECC meeting Basel,

Constraining the nuclear EoS by combining nuclear data and GW observations

Density dependence of the nuclear symmetry energy estimated from neutron skin thickness in finite nuclei

Neutron Star Mass and Radius Constraints on the Dense Matter Equation o

Isospin asymmetry in stable and exotic nuclei

Symmetry energy, masses and T=0 np-pairing

PoS(NIC XII)250. A new equation of state with abundances of all nuclei in core collapse simulations of massive stars

Fermi-Liquid Theory for Strong Interactions

IAS and Skin Constraints. Symmetry Energy

Neutron Star Observations and Their Implications for the Nuclear Equation of State

Nuclear Equation of State from ground and collective excited state properties of nuclei

Lecture 4. Magic Numbers

Preliminary Studies of Thermal Wavelength Approximation in 208 Pb and 91 Zr hot Nuclei

RFSS: Lecture 8 Nuclear Force, Structure and Models Part 1 Readings: Nuclear Force Nuclear and Radiochemistry:

The IC electrons are mono-energetic. Their kinetic energy is equal to the energy of the transition minus the binding energy of the electron.

Liquid drop model binding energy of spherical and semi-spherical atomic clusters

Nuclear models: The liquid drop model Fermi-Gas Model

Probing the Nuclear Symmetry Energy and Neutron Skin from Collective Excitations. N. Paar

Dipole Response of Exotic Nuclei and Symmetry Energy Experiments at the LAND R 3 B Setup

Neutron stars at JLAB and the Pb Radius Experiment

arxiv:nucl-th/ v3 8 Sep 2003

Pygmy dipole resonances in stable and unstable nuclei

Intermediate mass strangelets are positively charged. Abstract

Clusters in Nuclear Matter

Nuclear symmetry energy and neutron star cooling

EOS Constraints From Neutron Stars

Few-particle correlations in nuclear systems

Structure and propermes of nuclear ma3er in compact stars

Properties of Nuclei deduced from the Nuclear Mass

The Charged Liquid Drop Model Binding Energy and Fission

14 Supernovae (short overview) introduc)on to Astrophysics, C. Bertulani, Texas A&M-Commerce 1

b - stable matter of protoneutron star

Central density. Consider nuclear charge density. Frois & Papanicolas, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 37, 133 (1987) QMPT 540

INTRODUCTION. The present work is mainly concerned with the comprehensive analysis of nuclear binding energies and the

Coefficients and terms of the liquid drop model and mass formula

An empirical approach combining nuclear physics and dense nucleonic matter

Correlating the density dependence of the symmetry y energy to neutron skins and neutron-star properties

Inner crust composition and transition densities

Phase transitions in dilute stellar matter. Francesca Gulminelli & Adriana Raduta

Nuclear structure III: Nuclear and neutron matter. National Nuclear Physics Summer School Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) July 18-29, 2016

Applied Nuclear Physics (Fall 2006) Lecture 12 (10/25/06) Empirical Binding Energy Formula and Mass Parabolas

Neutron Stars. James M. Lattimer Dept. of Physics & Astronomy Stony Brook University Stony Brook, NY

Dipole Polarizability and the neutron skin thickness

Nuclear Reactions with light ion and photon beams; Contributions to Neutrino Astrophysics

Last Time... We discussed energy sources to a shell of stellar material:

Density dependence of the symmetry energy and the nuclear equation of state : A dynamical and statistical model perspective

Effect of Λ(1405) on structure of multi-antikaonic nuclei

arxiv: v1 [nucl-th] 21 Aug 2007

Part II Particle and Nuclear Physics Examples Sheet 4

arxiv:nucl-th/ v4 30 Jun 2005

Physics 228 Today: April 22, 2012 Ch. 43 Nuclear Physics. Website: Sakai 01:750:228 or

arxiv:nucl-th/ v1 4 Oct 1993

Lecture 4: Nuclear Energy Generation

Compact star crust: relativistic versus Skyrme nuclear models

Self-Consistent Equation of State for Hot Dense Matter: A Work in Progress

User s Guide for Neutron Star Matter EOS

Isospin and symmetry energy effects on nuclear fragment distributions in liquid-gas type phase transition region

Transcription:

Department of Physics & Astronomy 449 ESS Bldg. Stony Brook University April 25, 2017 Nuclear Astrophysics James.Lattimer@Stonybrook.edu

Zero Temperature Nuclear Matter

Expansions Cold, bulk, symmetric nuclear matter saturates at the nuclear saturation density n s 0.16 fm 3, equivalent to ρ s = m nn s 2.7 10 14 g cm 3. At n s, the energy per particle E B is minimized, so the pressure is zero. The binding energy at saturation is B = E B (n = n s, Y p = 0.5, T = 0) 16.0 MeV. One may expand E in each of the three dimensions (n, Y p, T ): «2 E B (n, 0.5, 0) B + Ks n 1 + K «3 s n 1 + 18 n s 162 n s E B (n s, Y p, 0) B + S v (1 2Y p) 2 + S 40 (1 2Y p) 4 + E B (n s, 0.5, T ) B + at 2 + The expansion parameters are K s 240 ± 20 MeV: Incompressibility parameter K s 200 ± 200 MeV: Skewness parameter S v 31 ± 3 MeV: Bulk symmetry energy parameter S 40 0 MeV: Bulk fourth order symmetry energy parameter a (m nπ 2 /2 2 )(1.5π 2 n s) 2/3 0.065 ± 0.010 MeV 1 : Level density parameter

The Nuclear Symmetry Energy Defined as the difference between the energies of cold pure neutron matter (Y p = x = 0) and symmetric (x = 1/2) nuclear matter. S(n) = E B (n, x = 0, T = 0) E B (n, x = 1/2, T = 0) Near n s and x = 1/2, E B (n, x) = E B (n, 1/2)+(1 2x) 2 S 2 (n)+ S 2 (n) = S v + L n n s + K ( ) 2 sym n ns + 3 n s 18 n s S v 31 ± 3 MeV, L 60 ± 40 MeV, K sym 150 ± 100 MeV. C. Fuchs, H.H. Wolter, EPJA 30(2006) 5 symmetry energy Connections to neutron matter: E B (n s, 0) S v + E B (n s, 1/2) = S v B, p(n s, 0) = Ln s /3 Neutron star matter (in beta equilibrium): [ (E B + E e ) = 0, p(n s, x β ) Ln s x 3 1 ( 4Sv c ) ] 3 4 3S v /L 3π 2 n s

The Nuclear Symmetry Energy Because of uncertainties in the nuclear symmetry energy parameters, the nuclear symmetry energy is a major uncertainty in the modeling of dense matter. Constraints on the symmetry energy come from nuclear observables, such as binding energies, giant dipole resonances, neutron skin thicknesses, isobaric analog states, etc. In addition, due to the approximate disappearance of higher-than-quadratic terms in the symmetry energy expansion in powers of 1 2x, the properties of pure neutron matter can inform about the symmetry parameters. Finally, due to the correlation between the neutron star matter pressure near n s and neutron star radii, astrophysical observations can also be used to estimate symmetry energy parameters.

The Nuclear Mass Formula or Liquid Drop Model Bethe-von Weizsäcker formula (neglecting pairing and shell effects) E nuc (A, Z) = a v A + a s A 2/3 + a C Z 2 /A 1/3 + S v AI 2. Myers & Swiatecki introduced the surface asymmetry term: E nuc (A, Z) = a v A + a s A 2/3 + a C Z 2 /A 1/3 + I 2 ( S v A S s A 2/3). a v = B, a s 18 MeV, a C 0.75 MeV, S s 45 MeV, I = (N Z)/A Determining the Optimum Nucleus: E nuc /A A E nuc /A I = a s 3 A 4/3 + a C 6 A 1/3 (1 I ) 2 S s 3 I 2 A 4/3 = 0 = a C 2 A2/3 (1 I ) + 2S v I 2S s A 1/3 I A = 2(a s + S s I 2 ) a C (1 I ) 2 48 (1 + 2I + ) 60 a C I = 0.13 4S v A 2/3 4S s /A + a C

Isolated Nuclei The binding energy curve is heavily skewed. Certain closed-shell nuclei (He, C, O, Pb) have much larger binding than the average. The optimum value of I increases with mass number A. This trend represents the Valley of Beta Stability.

Nuclei at Higher Densities At the end of stellar evolution, when an iron core forms, the central stellar density is about ρ 10 7 g cm 3, implying a filling factor u = ρ/ρ s 3.7 10 8. The intranuclear spacing is about 2u 1/3 600 nuclear radii. Electron screening reduces the nuclear Coulomb energy. Approximating electrons as uniformly distributed, even within nuclei, the nuclear Coulomb energy is: E Coul = 3 Z 2 e 2 ( 1 3 5 R 2 u1/3 + u ) 2 The reduction factor is about 0.5% for ρ 10 7 g cm 3. This effect increases the nuclear mass, which is proportional to E 1 Coul, as the average density increases. The optimum I also increases with density due to beta equilibrium: (E nuc /A + E e /A) x = µ n + µ p + µ e = 0.

Chemical Potentials and Neutron Drip Chemical potentials are equivalent to nucleon separation energies: ( ) ( ) (Enuc /A) (Enuc /A) µ n =, µ p =, N Z Z µ e = (E e/a) = c(3π 2 n s ux) 1/3, Y e = x, Y ( e ) (Enuc /A) µ n µ p = x At sufficiently high density, about ρ = (3.5 4) 10 11 g cm 3, as x becomes smaller and A becomes larger, µ n becomes positive. Neutrons thus drip out of nuclei., A N

Nuclear Droplet Model Myers & Swiatecki droplet extension: consider the variation of the neutron/proton asymmetry within the nuclear surface. E nuc = ( B + S v δ 2 )(A N s ) + (a s S s δ 2 )A 2/3 + a C Z 2 A 1/3 + µ n N s. N s is the number of excess neutrons associated with the surface, δ = 1 2x = (A N s 2Z)/(A N s ) is the asymmetry of the nuclear bulk fluid, and µ n = B + S v δ(2 δ) is the neutron chemical potential. Surface tension is the surface thermodynamic potential; adding µ n N s gives the total surface energy. Optimizing E nuc with respect to N s yields N s = S s S v δ 1 δ = A I δ ( 1 δ, δ = I 1 + S ) 1 s, S v A 1/3 E nuc (A, Z) = BA + a s A 2/3 + a C Z 2 /A 1/3 + S v AI 2 ( 1 + S s S v A 1/3 ) 1.

Schematic Bulk Free Energy Density F B (n, x, T ); n: number density; x: proton fraction; T : temperature n s 0.16 ± 0.01 fm 3 : nuclear saturation density B 16 ± 1 MeV: saturation binding energy K s 200 ± 200 MeV: K s 240 ± 20 MeV: incompressibility skewness S v 31 ± 3 MeV: bulk symmetry energy K sym 150 ± 100 MeV: L 60 ± 40 MeV: symmetry stiffness symmetry incompressibility a 0.065 ± 0.010 MeV 1 : bulk level density parameter [ F B = n B + K ( s 1 n ) ] 2 n ( + S v (1 2x) 2 ns ) 2/3 a T 2 18 n s n s n P B = n 2 (F [ ( ) ] B/n) = n2 Ks n 1 + S v (1 2x) 2 + 2an ( ns ) 2/3T 2 n n s 9 n s 3 n µ n,b = F B n x F B n x = B + K ) ) s (1 (1 nns 3 nns n + 2S v (1 2x) a ( ns ) 2/3T 2 18 n s 3 n ˆµ B = 1 F B n x = µ n n µ p = 4S v (1 2x) n s s B = 1 F ( B n T = 2a ns ) 2/3 T ; εb = F B + nts B n

Phase Coexistence Negative pressure region: matter is unstable to separating into two phases of different densities (and possibly proton fractions). Physically, this represents coexistence of nuclei and vapor. Neglecting finite-size effects, bulk coexistence approximates the EOS at subnuclear densities. Free Energy Minimization With Two Phases F = ε nts = uf B,I + (1 u)f B,II, n = un I + (1 u)n II, ny e = ux I n I + (1 u)x II n II. n II = n un I 1 u, x II = ny e un I x I n un I F = u F B,I + (1 u) F ( ) B,II u = u(µ n,b,i µ n,b,ii ) = 0 n I n I n II 1 u F = u F B,I + (1 u) F ( ) B,II uni = un I (ˆµ B,I ˆµ B,II ) = 0 x I x I x [ II n ( un I ) F u = F FB,II nii n I B,I F B,II + (1 u) + F ( )] B,II uni = 0 n II 1 u x II n un I = µ n,b,i = µ n,b,ii, µ p,b,i = µ p,b,ii, P B,I = P B,II

Critical Point (Y e = 0.5) ( ) PB = n T ( 2 ) P B n 2 = 0 T n c = 5 12 n s ( ) 1/3 ( 5 5Ks T c = 12 32a ( ) 1/3 ( 12 5Ks a s c = 5 8 ) 1/2 ) 1/2

Macroscopic Hydrodynamic Nuclear Model H = H B (n, α)+h C (n, α)+q(n) ( ) 2 dn, H B (n, α) = H B (n, 0)+v sym(n)α 2 dr n = n n + n p, α = n n n p, v sym = S 2 (n)/n, H C = n p V C /2 r V C (r) = e2 n p (r )d 3 r e 2 ( + r r n p(r )d 3 r Ze2 3 R 2 r 2 ) 2R 2 0 Optimize total energy with respect to n and α subject to fixed A = ρd 3 r and N Z = αd 3 r: µ = [H B + H C ] n δ δ [H µn] = 0, δn = 2 d dr r [ Q dn ] + Q dr n [H µα] = 0. δα ( ) 2 dn, µ = [H B + H C ] dr α Multiply first by dn/dr and second by dα/dr, add, then integrate: ( ) 2 dn Q(n) = H B + H C µn µα dr

Surface Energy Consider a symmetric, chargeless nucleus. The total energy, the sum of volume and surface energies, is Hd 3 r = µa + [H µn] d 3 r µa + 4πR 2 [H µn] dx We made a leptodermous expansion above to isolate the surface. [ ( ) ] 2 dn E vol,o + E surf,o = µa + 4πR 2 H B (n, 0) µn + Q(n) dx dx 0 Assume H B (n, 0) = nµ + (nk s /18)(1 u) 2, u = n/n s, Q(n) = Q/n, µ = B: du dz = u(1 u), z = x 18Q a, a = 1, u = K s 1 + e z y [ A = 4πn s a 3 z i ( ) ] i+1 2 dz y i(i + 1) π F 2 (y), F i (y) = 1 + +... 1 + ez y i + 1 6 y This fixes the parameter y R/a. The symmetric matter surface tension is σ o = E ( ) 2 surf,o dn 4πR 2 = 2Q dz 0 dz n = 2Q dn dn dz n = Qn s a n s

Parameter Determination 0.9 t 90 10 = a 0.1 dz du = 4a ln 3 = 2.3 fm, du a 0.523 fm Q = K s 18 σ o = ( t90 10 4 ln 3 ) 2 3.65 MeV fm 2, K s = 240 MeV [H µn]dx = 2Q ( ) 2 dn dx 0 dx n = 2Q dn dn n s dr n = Qn s 1.17 MeV fm 2 a ( ) 1/3 3 a s = 4πro 2 σ o 19.2 MeV, r o = 1.143 fm 4πn s

The Isovector Density α H i = [H µα] α = [H B(n, α) + H C (n, α)] α µ = 0 α = µ + H C / α = µ + V C /2 2v sym 2v sym µ + VC /2 N Z = IA = d 3 r µ 2v sym 2 H 0 + G 4 ( r ) i d 3 r, G = V C d 3 r = Ze2 R v sym v sym 2R (3H 0 H 2 ) α = N Z (G V C H 0 )/4 v sym H 0 α o = n ) s (N Z + Ze2 S v H 0 8R H 2, v sym (n s ) = S v n s The polarization results in an increase in asymmetry near the center, α o.

Nuclear Structure The total symmetry and Coulomb energy: E sym + E C = v sym α 2 d 3 r + 1 (n α)v C d 3 r 4 (N Z)2 (N Z)G = + 1 nv C d 3 r H 0 4H 0 4 (N Z)2 = + 3 Z 2 e 2 ( H 0 5 R + Ze2 Hs (N Z) 3 ) 8R H 0 5 Dipole polarizability α D : ( δ δα Hd 3 r ɛ α d is the function α(r) which solves this. ) zαd 3 r = 0 α D = 1 2ɛ α d = ɛz + V C zα d d 3 r = 1 4ɛ 2v sym z ɛz + V C d 3 r = R2 H 2 v sym 12

Neutron Skin Thickness 4π 3 ( R 3 n R 3 p) = ( nn n no n p = n sa 2n no n po n po ( I α o ) d 3 r = n s ) n s 2n no n po ( α n α ) o d 3 r n s R n R p 2 I α o /n s R 3 1 αo/n 2 s 2 = 2 [ ( I 1 A ) ] Ze2 H 2 3 S v H 0 8RS v H 0 Polarization decreases neutron skin thickness. Symmetric nuclei have a proton skin. rn,p 2 = 1 n n,p r 2 d 3 1 r = (n ± α)r 2 d 3 r (N, Z) 2(N, Z) ])] r np R r n r p R = R2 1 ± I = 3 5 [ 3 5 ± [ I ( I H 2 Ze2 H 0 8RA [ H 4 H2 2 ( ) 5H2 1 5Ze2 3H 0 24RA H 0 ( H 4 H2 2 H 0 )] 1 1 I 2

Solutions for Arbitrary v sym Assume v sym can be expanded as S v n s v sym (u) = J b j u j, 0 < u < 1 j=1 If the density to lowest order retains the Fermi shape u = (1 + e (r R)/a ) 1 obtained in the absence of symmetry and Coulomb effects, we find ( r ) i d 3 r H i = = 4πn sa 3+i R v sym S v R i [F i+2 (y) (2 + i)t F i+1 (y) + ] where T = b 2 + 3 2 b 3 + 11 6 b 4 + 25 12 b 5 + 137 60 b 6 +. J j=1 b j = 1 ensures that v sym (u = 1) = S v /n s. Expanding the Fermi integrals to lowest order gives H i 3 [ ] A (i + 3)T a 1 +. i + 3 r o A 1/3 S v

Macroscopic Quantities Compare the total symmetry energy in the droplet model with that in the hydrodynamic model: ( E sym = S v AI 2 1 + S ) 1 s = A2 I 2 ( = S S v A 1/3 v AI 2 1 3T a ) 1. H 0 r o A 1/3 It is thus apparent that S s /S v 3T a/r o. It now follows that r np H i 3 3 + i A S v ( 1 + (i + 3)S ) s 3S v A 1/3 ( α D = R2 H 2 AR2 1 + 5 ) S s 12 20S v 3 S v A 1/3 ( 3 2r o 5(1 I 2 1 + S ) 1 [ s I S s 3Ze2 ) 3 S v A 1/3 S v 140r o S v ( 1 + 10 3 S s S v A 1/3 )].

Connections Among the Symmetry Parameters The symmetry parameters S v, L and K sym are defined by the expansion S 2(u) S v + L Ksym (u 1) + 3 18 (u 1)2 +. Fitting to nuclear binding energies has established a significant correlation exists between K sym and L: K sym 3L K s Comparing Taylor expansions of us v /S 2(u) and P 4 j=1 b iu i around u = 1: " b 2 = L «# 2 2L Ks L 3 Ks 2.667 3S v 3S v 3S v 3S v 9S v " b 3 = L 5L + Ks 3S v 6S v " b 4 = L L Ks 3S v 3S v " T = L L 3S v 36S v L + 3 3S v 3S v L 9S v 3S v Ks 27S v 1 3 «# 2 1 2 «# 2 L 3S v 0.444 + Ks 18S v 1.667 «# 2 3 Ks 0.982 4 36S v We used L/S v = 2 and K s/s v = 8. To leading order, one finds S s/s v 1.35

A Nucleus in Dense Matter Bulk equilibrium is the 0th order approximation. Now include finite-size effects: Coulomb, surface and translation. Coulomb energy of uniformly dense sphere: f C = 3 Z 2 e 2 5 R. Coulomb energy of uniformly dense sphere within a larger neutral sphere (Wigner-Seitz cell): [ 3 Z 2 e 2 1 3 R + 1 ( ) ] 3 R. 5 R 2 R c 2 Diffuseness correction to uniform sphere (d 0.55 fm): [ π2 Z 2 e 2 dd 2 ( ) ] 3 R 2R 3 1 Exchange correction (effects of antisymmetrized wave functions): ( ) 3e2 3Z 2 2/3 ] [1 RRc 4R 2π R c R c

Translational Free Energy Nuclei treated as a non-degenerate gas: [ ( ) ] n f T = T ln 1 n Q VA 3/2 n Q = ( ) 3/2 mb T 2π 2 = µ T T A simplification of the translational free energy density to eliminate dependence on R and incorporate pasta effects: [ ( ) ] F T = f T V = 3uf T 4πR 3 = u(1 u)tn I u(1 u)n I ln 1 A o n Q A 5/2 o u = 4πR3 3V, A o 60

Surface Energy According to the droplet model we form the sum of the surface tension and surface neutron terms: f s = 4πR 2 (σ + µ s ν s ) σ is the surface tension, to be considered a function of the surface neutron chemical potential, µ s and T. Both σ and µ s can be expressed as functions of the proton fraction of phase I, x I, and T, and can be found from semi-infinite surface calculations, e.g., σ(t = 0) = σ 0 σ δ (1 2x I ) 2 ν s = N s /(4πR 2 ) is the areal density of neutrons connected with the surface F s = f s V = 3u R (σ + ν sµ s )

Inclusion of Pasta Phases F s = 3u R (σ + ν sµ s ) β S 3u R F C0 = β C R 2 u β C R 2 D 3 (u) [ 1 3 2 u1/3 + u ] 2 With arbitrary dimensionality d: du F s = β S R β Ss(u) [ F C0 = β C R 2 5u d 2 1 d 4 2 u1 2/d + d 2 ] u 2 β C R 2 c(u) d = 2 : c(u) = (5u/8)(u 1 ln u)

Model Free Energy Density F = uf I (n I, x I, T ) + (1 u)f II (n II, x II, T )+ + F s (ν s, µ s, R, u) + F C (n I, x I, R, u) + F T (n I, u, T ) F s = s(u) R (σ(µ s, T ) + µ s ν s ) F C = 4π 5 c(u)(n I x I er) 2 [ 2π 3 u(n I x I e) 2 (πd d ) 2 (1 u) + 9 8π [ ( ) ] F T = un I A o ln n I u n Q A 5/2 o 1 n = un I + (1 u)n II + s(u) R ν s ny e = un I x I + (1 u)n II x II ( ) 1/3 3 ( 1 u 1/3)] π

Equilibrium Conditions n II = n un I s(u)ν s /R 1 u ny e un I x I x II = n un I s(u)ν s /R F / n I = 0 µ ni = µ nii + (1 u)µ T /A o F / x I = 0 ˆµ I = ˆµ II 2βD/(3n I x I u) F / (ν s /R) = 0 µ s = µ nii F / µ s = 0 ν s = σ/ µ s F / R = 0 R = (9σ/2β)[s(u)/c(u)] 1/3 F / u = 0 P I = P II + β[d 2D/(3u)] un I µ T /A o ( ) 1/3 243π β = (n I x I σe) 2/3, 5 D(u) = ( s 2 (u)c(u) ) 1/3 D(u) u(1 u) (F s + F C0 ) d = β D d = 0 (1 u)d1/3 3 (u) + ud 1/3 3 (1 u) u 2 + (1 u) 2 + 0.6u 2 (1 u) 2

Nuclei and α Abundances in Neutron Stars

Electron Fractions in Neutron Stars

Nuclear Details in Neutron Stars

Nuclei and α Abundances in Supernova Matter

Nuclear Details in Supernova Matter

Nuclei in Dense Matter