Simulation of Quantum Cascade Lasers

Similar documents
Quantum and Non-local Transport Models in Crosslight Device Simulators. Copyright 2008 Crosslight Software Inc.

INSTITUTE BECKMAN. K. Hess, Y. Liu, F. Oyafuso, W.C. Ng and B.D. Klein. The Beckman Institute University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Cornell University. ECE 5330: Semiconductor Optoelectronics. Fall 2014

Terahertz Lasers Based on Intersubband Transitions

Quantum Device Simulation. Overview Of Atlas Quantum Features

Sheng S. Li. Semiconductor Physical Electronics. Second Edition. With 230 Figures. 4) Springer

White Rose Research Online URL for this paper:

Crosslight Software Overview, New Features & Updates. Dr. Peter Mensz

Basic Principles of Light Emission in Semiconductors

Computer Aided Design of GaN Light-Emitting Diodes. Copyright 2006 Crosslight Software Inc.

Non-equilibrium Green s functions: Rough interfaces in THz quantum cascade lasers

Effect of non-uniform distribution of electric field on diffusedquantum well lasers

Semiconductor Physical Electronics

External (differential) quantum efficiency Number of additional photons emitted / number of additional electrons injected

Emission Spectra of the typical DH laser

Time-Resolved Investigations of Electronic Transport Dynamics in Quantum Cascade Lasers Based on Diagonal Lasing Transition

Simulation of GaN-based Light-Emitting Devices

Atlas III-V Advanced Material Device Modeling

Current mechanisms Exam January 27, 2012

Laser Diodes. Revised: 3/14/14 14: , Henry Zmuda Set 6a Laser Diodes 1

Semiconductor Physics and Devices Chapter 3.

Semiconductor Module

Introduction to Optoelectronic Device Simulation by Joachim Piprek

Schottky Rectifiers Zheng Yang (ERF 3017,

HIGH-POWER BIPOLAR AND UNIPOLAR QUANTUM CASCADE LASERS

Chapter 5. Semiconductor Laser

GaN-based Devices: Physics and Simulation

Thermionic Current Modeling and Equivalent Circuit of a III-V MQW P-I-N Photovoltaic Heterostructure

Metal Semiconductor Contacts

MODAL GAIN AND CURRENT DENSITY RELATIONSHIP FOR PbSe/PbSrSe QUANTUM WELL NORMAL AND OBLIQUE DEGENERATE VALLEYS

Semiconductor Physical Electronics

Defense Technical Information Center Compilation Part Notice

eterostrueture Integrated Thermionic Refrigeration

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Blaze/Blaze 3D. Device Simulator for Advanced Materials

Diode Lasers and Photonic Integrated Circuits

Review Energy Bands Carrier Density & Mobility Carrier Transport Generation and Recombination

ESE 372 / Spring 2013 / Lecture 5 Metal Oxide Semiconductor Field Effect Transistor

Schottky diodes. JFETs - MESFETs - MODFETs

Microscopic Modelling of the Optical Properties of Quantum-Well Semiconductor Lasers

High Power Diode Lasers

Electron leakage effects on GaN-based light-emitting diodes

Introduction Fundamentals of laser Types of lasers Semiconductor lasers

Theoretical investigation on intrinsic linewidth of quantum cascade lasers. Liu Tao

Optical Nonlinearities in Quantum Wells

ELECTRONS AND PHONONS IN SEMICONDUCTOR MULTILAYERS

Introduction to Sources: Radiative Processes and Population Inversion in Atoms, Molecules, and Semiconductors Atoms and Molecules

Internal Efficiency of Semiconductor Lasers With a Quantum-Confined Active Region

Performance Evaluation of Quantum Cascaded Lasers through VisSim Modeling

Lecture 2. Electron states and optical properties of semiconductor nanostructures

Quantum Phenomena & Nanotechnology (4B5)

ELECTRONS AND PHONONS IN SEMICONDUCTOR MULTILAYERS

Photonic Devices. Light absorption and emission. Transitions between discrete states

MTLE-6120: Advanced Electronic Properties of Materials. Semiconductor p-n junction diodes. Reading: Kasap ,

Signal regeneration - optical amplifiers

3-1-2 GaSb Quantum Cascade Laser

VERSION 4.0. Nanostructure semiconductor quantum simulation software for scientists and engineers.

(b) Spontaneous emission. Absorption, spontaneous (random photon) emission and stimulated emission.

Semiconductor Physics and Devices

Other Devices from p-n junctions

Quantum Dot Lasers. Jose Mayen ECE 355

Carrier Loss Analysis for Ultraviolet Light-Emitting Diodes

InGaAs-AlAsSb quantum cascade lasers

CONTENTS. vii. CHAPTER 2 Operators 15

ISSN Review. Progress to a Gallium-Arsenide Deep-Center Laser

Microcavity Length Role On The Characteristic Temperature And The Properties Of Quantum Dot Laser

Carrier Dynamics in Quantum Cascade Lasers

EE 6313 Homework Assignments

Lasers. Stimulated Emission Lasers: Trapping Photons Terahertz Lasers Course Overview

3-1-1 GaAs-based Quantum Cascade Lasers

Design Optimization for 4.1-THZ Quantum Cascade Lasers

Stimulated Emission Devices: LASERS

Chapter 2 Optical Transitions

High performance THz quantum cascade lasers

A STUDY OF DYNAMIC CHARACTERIZATIONS OF GaAs/ALGaAs SELF-ASSEMBLED QUANTUM DOT LASERS

ANALYSIS OF AN INJECTION-LOCKED BISTABLE SEMICONDUCTOR LASER WITH THE FREQUENCY CHIRPING

Saturation and noise properties of quantum-dot optical amplifiers

Noise in voltage-biased scaled semiconductor laser diodes

Influence of the quantum well models on the numerical simulation of planar InGaN/GaN LED results

Optoelectronics ELEC-E3210

Study on Quantum Dot Lasers and their advantages

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Course overview. Me: Dr Luke Wilson. The course: Physics and applications of semiconductors. Office: E17 open door policy

interband transitions in semiconductors M. Fox, Optical Properties of Solids, Oxford Master Series in Condensed Matter Physics

Application II: The Ballistic Field-E ect Transistor

EE 3329 Electronic Devices Syllabus ( Extended Play )

Index. buried oxide 35, 44 51, 89, 238 buried channel 56

8. Schottky contacts / JFETs

MONTE CARLO SIMULATION OF ELECTRON DYNAMICS IN QUANTUM CASCADE LASERS. Xujiao Gao

Paper Review. Special Topics in Optical Engineering II (15/1) Minkyu Kim. IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics, Feb 1985

Segmented 1.55um Laser with 400% Differential Quantum Efficiency J. Getty, E. Skogen, L. Coldren, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA.

Lab #5 Current/Voltage Curves, Efficiency Measurements and Quantum Efficiency

EECS130 Integrated Circuit Devices

Semiconductor Devices and Circuits Fall Midterm Exam. Instructor: Dr. Dietmar Knipp, Professor of Electrical Engineering. Name: Mat. -Nr.

Modeling of Transport and Gain in Quantum Cascade Lasers

Electroluminescence from Silicon and Germanium Nanostructures

Organic Device Simulation Using Silvaco Software. Silvaco Taiwan September 2005

Pressure and Temperature Dependence of Threshold Current in Semiconductor Lasers Based on InGaAs/GaAs Quantum-Well Systems

Nonlinear optics with quantum-engineered intersubband metamaterials

Transcription:

Lighting up the Semiconductor World Simulation of Quantum Cascade Lasers 2005-2010 Crosslight Software Inc.

Lighting up the Semiconductor World A A Contents Microscopic rate equation approach Challenge in carrier transport modeling A Solution in 2/3D simulator

Subband engineering Given MQW structure, all quantum states are solved. Energy levels and intersubband transition dipole moments computed for all pairs of states. Critical states identified according to design ideas such as the so-called 3- level design.

Simulation procedures Set up 1D mesh for two periods of QCL in gain-preview session. Assume a uniform applied field and solve the quantum states. Discretize Schrodinger equation in 1D and solve with sparse eigen matrix techniques. Identify and label states belonging to injection or active regions, based on shape and location of wave functions and their respective energy levels.

Active region Injection region Active region Injection region InGaAs/InAlAs QCL Following J. Kim et. al., IEEE JQE Vol. 40, p. 1663, 2004. Red lines: Conduction bands; Green lines: subband levels and envelop wave Functions. Blue line: macroscopic single Fermi level.

Microscopic rate equations level3 Active region level2 level1 31 32 Stimulated emission Active region 21 ext Injection region inj 31 32 Equations in form: dn/dt = n/tau_in n/tau_out. 21 ext Injection region Coupled with cavity photon rate equation. Relate device current to injection region current. Closed set of equations to get lasing characteristics.

Distribution of Electrons Active region Injection region Active region Injection region Electron distribution based on subband population calculated by microscopic rate equations

Distribution of subband electrons Active level3 Active level1 Active level2 First 9 levels are plotted with the first three levels in active region labeled

Gain spectrum-i Increasing current from 10 to 500 ma with peak gain set by threshold at 150 ma All possible intersubband transitions evaluated assuming wavelength independent waveguide loss and broadening constant.

Gain spectrum-ii J. Kim et. al., IEEE JQE Vol. 40, p. 1663, 2004 Reasonable agreement with experiment achieved.

Two injection schemes lasing lasing (a) Assume all tau s are constants and all levels are initially unoccupied. Current injection increases occupancy until lasing. (b) Assume injection region and active level1 are initially occupied. 1/tau_injection set to increase linearly with current to preserve total sheet charge.

Both schemes result in same lasing characteristics Remarks Stimulated recombination in QC laser does not pin the carrier density but only levels it off. Overall densities in active region still increase substantially as current is injected. Lack of density pinning explains absence of lasing relaxation oscillation in laser turnon/off. Lasing action does not require or imply charge neutrality.

Contents A A Microscopic rate equation approach Challenge in carrier transport modeling A Solution in 2/3D simulator

Challenges in transport modeling Microscopic rate equations: Time constants contain no information on how electrons get there from the contacts. One still has to work on transport on larger size scale.

Challenges in transport modeling Commonly used device simulators: Mobility-based drift-diffusion and thermionic emission. Quantum tunneling done for few barriers as correction to drift-diffusion model. Requirement for QCL: Drift-diffusion and thermionic emission still needed. Quantum tunneling for hundreds of barriers.

E Going beyond quasi-equilibrium? High field Conventional Fermi-Dirac Tunneling emitter src N(E) Hot carriers Transport may not be local or sequential

Contents A A Microscopic rate equation approach Challenge in carrier transport modeling A Solution in 2/3D simulator

The conventional: Equations and models Drift-diffusion equations with thermionic boundary. Scalar optical mode solver. Laser cavity photon rate equation. QCL specifics: Local optical gain as a function of local current according to microscopic rate: g(j,s). Within period: transport between injection/active regions according to microscropic rate eq. Non-local transport between periods and to/from contacts. Resonant tunneling effects

Non-local injection model Between periods To/from contacts Injection with mean free path

Non-local injection mobility Increase of mobility due to build-up of hot carriers and lowering of tunneling barriers at higher fields.

QCL 2D example 25 periods, assuming same MQW and microscopic rates as in previous sections.

Optical mode

Applied potential

Current distribution Jy Log10(Jx)

Band diagrams (QCL 25 periods) 0 Volt 2.5 Volt 5 Volt 10 Volt

1D cuts of electron concentration and Jy (@10 V) Reduction caused by current spreading

1D cuts of optical intensity and optical gain (@10 V) Rem: a single mode does not use all the periods. Much stronger gain suppression than LD Non-linear gain suppression

I-V and modal gain spectrum Remark: turn-on voltage sensitive to field dependence of non-local injection mobility May not have a classical interpretation. Remark: change in shape indicates non-linear suppression. Modal gain at 0, 2.5, 5, 7.5 and 10 volts.

Lasing characteristics and efficiency per period Yet to be included: 1) Heating effect. 2) Gain peak detuning due to potential variation. Source of inefficiency: 1) Lack of overlap with single mode. 2) Nonradiative transition within microscopic rate model. 3) Part of non-local current excluded from the microscopic rate model.

Summary Subband structure calculation enables the basic design of QCL such as emission wavelength and miniband alignments. Microscopic rate equation model generates a convenient optical gain as a function of local current and photon densities g(j,s). Main challenge in macroscopic QCL simulation is to inject electrons from contact to MQW and to collect them from MQW to contact. We propose a non-local current injection model with a mean-free-path of 100-1000 A. Field dependent mobility of non-local injection needed to obtain reasonable results.

About Crosslight A leading semiconductor TCAD provider since 1993 Complete product portfolio for semiconductor device simulation Innovative simulation tools to ensure a fast and seamlessly transfer from process to device simulation Ultra efficient 3D structure combined with powerful and easy to use 3D editor to provide class leading 3D simulation experience Café-time Simulator. Windows based, user friendly graphic user interface makes simulation more enjoyable.