Canonical transformations

Similar documents
10. Canonical Transformations Michael Fowler

PHYS 705: Classical Mechanics. Canonical Transformation II

12. The Hamilton-Jacobi Equation Michael Fowler

PHYS 705: Classical Mechanics. Calculus of Variations II

Poisson brackets and canonical transformations

Lecture 20: Noether s Theorem

Physics 5153 Classical Mechanics. Principle of Virtual Work-1

Mechanics Physics 151

The Feynman path integral

Integrals and Invariants of Euler-Lagrange Equations

Physics 5153 Classical Mechanics. D Alembert s Principle and The Lagrangian-1

Analytical classical dynamics

Lagrangian Field Theory

ON MECHANICS WITH VARIABLE NONCOMMUTATIVITY

Quantum Mechanics I Problem set No.1

PHYS 705: Classical Mechanics. Hamilton-Jacobi Equation

Inner Product. Euclidean Space. Orthonormal Basis. Orthogonal

Mechanics Physics 151

Integrals and Invariants of

coordinates. Then, the position vectors are described by

Lecture 12: Discrete Laplacian

CHAPTER 14 GENERAL PERTURBATION THEORY

6. Hamilton s Equations

Classical Field Theory

Salmon: Lectures on partial differential equations. Consider the general linear, second-order PDE in the form. ,x 2

Three views of mechanics

Calculus of Variations Basics

Mathematical Preparations

1 Matrix representations of canonical matrices

Report on Image warping

Snce h( q^; q) = hq ~ and h( p^ ; p) = hp, one can wrte ~ h hq hp = hq ~hp ~ (7) the uncertanty relaton for an arbtrary state. The states that mnmze t

Mechanics Physics 151

χ x B E (c) Figure 2.1.1: (a) a material particle in a body, (b) a place in space, (c) a configuration of the body

14 The Postulates of Quantum mechanics

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY 6.265/15.070J Fall 2013 Lecture 12 10/21/2013. Martingale Concentration Inequalities and Applications

3.1 Expectation of Functions of Several Random Variables. )' be a k-dimensional discrete or continuous random vector, with joint PMF p (, E X E X1 E X

Difference Equations

Lecture 10 Support Vector Machines II

Kernel Methods and SVMs Extension

Iterative General Dynamic Model for Serial-Link Manipulators

EPR Paradox and the Physical Meaning of an Experiment in Quantum Mechanics. Vesselin C. Noninski

The Order Relation and Trace Inequalities for. Hermitian Operators

The non-negativity of probabilities and the collapse of state

The generating function of a canonical transformation

Transfer Functions. Convenient representation of a linear, dynamic model. A transfer function (TF) relates one input and one output: ( ) system

Bernoulli Numbers and Polynomials

Problem Do any of the following determine homomorphisms from GL n (C) to GL n (C)?

CHAPTER 6. LAGRANGE S EQUATIONS (Analytical Mechanics)

Chapter 6. Hamilton s Equations. 6.1 Legendre transforms 156 CHAPTER 6. HAMILTON S EQUATIONS

CHAPTER 5: Lie Differentiation and Angular Momentum

PHYS 705: Classical Mechanics. Newtonian Mechanics

A particle in a state of uniform motion remain in that state of motion unless acted upon by external force.

Lecture 6/7 (February 10/12, 2014) DIRAC EQUATION. The non-relativistic Schrödinger equation was obtained by noting that the Hamiltonian 2

Open Systems: Chemical Potential and Partial Molar Quantities Chemical Potential

The Multiple Classical Linear Regression Model (CLRM): Specification and Assumptions. 1. Introduction

NUMERICAL DIFFERENTIATION

n α j x j = 0 j=1 has a nontrivial solution. Here A is the n k matrix whose jth column is the vector for all t j=0

On the symmetric character of the thermal conductivity tensor

In this section is given an overview of the common elasticity models.

9 Characteristic classes

Advanced Quantum Mechanics

APPENDIX A Some Linear Algebra

Using T.O.M to Estimate Parameter of distributions that have not Single Exponential Family

C/CS/Phy191 Problem Set 3 Solutions Out: Oct 1, 2008., where ( 00. ), so the overall state of the system is ) ( ( ( ( 00 ± 11 ), Φ ± = 1

Review of Newtonian Mechanics

Prof. Dr. I. Nasser Phys 630, T Aug-15 One_dimensional_Ising_Model

CHAPTER 5 NUMERICAL EVALUATION OF DYNAMIC RESPONSE

Notes on Analytical Dynamics

Finding Dense Subgraphs in G(n, 1/2)

THE CHINESE REMAINDER THEOREM. We should thank the Chinese for their wonderful remainder theorem. Glenn Stevens

ON A DETERMINATION OF THE INITIAL FUNCTIONS FROM THE OBSERVED VALUES OF THE BOUNDARY FUNCTIONS FOR THE SECOND-ORDER HYPERBOLIC EQUATION

THEOREMS OF QUANTUM MECHANICS

ELASTIC WAVE PROPAGATION IN A CONTINUOUS MEDIUM

ANSWERS. Problem 1. and the moment generating function (mgf) by. defined for any real t. Use this to show that E( U) var( U)

Module 9. Lecture 6. Duality in Assignment Problems

Module 3: Element Properties Lecture 1: Natural Coordinates

Georgia Tech PHYS 6124 Mathematical Methods of Physics I

Goodness of fit and Wilks theorem

Appendix B. The Finite Difference Scheme

Implicit Integration Henyey Method

Section 8.3 Polar Form of Complex Numbers

Lagrange Multipliers. A Somewhat Silly Example. Monday, 25 September 2013

Point symmetries of the Euler Lagrange equations

Lecture 13 APPROXIMATION OF SECOMD ORDER DERIVATIVES

Bezier curves. Michael S. Floater. August 25, These notes provide an introduction to Bezier curves. i=0

Lectures - Week 4 Matrix norms, Conditioning, Vector Spaces, Linear Independence, Spanning sets and Basis, Null space and Range of a Matrix

A how to guide to second quantization method.

4. Laws of Dynamics: Hamilton s Principle and Noether's Theorem

), it produces a response (output function g (x)

Module 1 : The equation of continuity. Lecture 1: Equation of Continuity

10.34 Fall 2015 Metropolis Monte Carlo Algorithm

Week 2. This week, we covered operations on sets and cardinality.

Lorentz Group. Ling Fong Li. 1 Lorentz group Generators Simple representations... 3

ADVANCED MACHINE LEARNING ADVANCED MACHINE LEARNING

On covariant Poisson brackets in classical field theory

Homework Notes Week 7

College of Computer & Information Science Fall 2009 Northeastern University 20 October 2009

Foundations of Arithmetic

LAGRANGIAN MECHANICS

Representation theory and quantum mechanics tutorial Representation theory and quantum conservation laws

Transcription:

Canoncal transformatons November 23, 2014 Recall that we have defned a symplectc transformaton to be any lnear transformaton M A B leavng the symplectc form nvarant, Ω AB M A CM B DΩ CD Coordnate transformatons, χ A ξ B whch are symplectc transformatons at each pont are called canoncal. Specfcally, those functons χ A ξ satsfyng Ω CD χc χd ΩAB ξa ξ B are canoncal transformatons. Canoncal transformatons preserve Hamlton s equatons. 1 Posson brackets We may also wrte Hamlton s equatons n terms of Posson brackets between dynamcal varables. By a dynamcal varable, we mean any functon f f ξ A of the canoncal coordnates used to descrbe a physcal system. We defne the Posson bracket of any two dynamcal varables f and g by AB f g f, g} Ω The mportance of ths product s that t s preserved by canoncal transformatons. We see ths as follows. Let ξ A be any set of phase space coordnates n whch Hamlton s equatons take the form dξ A AB H Ω ξ B 1 and let f and g be any two dynamcal varables. Denote the Posson bracket of f and g n the coordnates ξ A be denoted by f, g} ξ. In a dfferent set of coordnates, χ A ξ, we have AB f g f, g} χ Ω χ A χ B ξ Ω AB C f ξ D χ A ξ C χ B ξ C ξd f ΩAB χa χ B ξ C Therefore, f the coordnate transformaton s canoncal so that ξ C ξd ΩAB χa χ B ΩCD g ξ D g ξ D 1

we have AB f g f, g} χ Ω ξ C ξ D f, g} ξ and the Posson bracket s unchanged. We conclude that canoncal transformatons preserve all Posson brackets. Conversely, a transformaton whch preserves all Posson brackets satsfes ξ C ξd ΩAB χa χ B f ξ C f, g} χ f, g} ξ g f ΩCD ξd ξ C for all f, g and must therefore be canoncal. An mportant specal case of the Posson bracket occurs when one of the functons s the Hamltonan. In that case, we have AB f H f, H} Ω f H x f H p p x f x dx f p df f dp or smply, df f f, H} + Ths shows that as the system evolves classcally, the total tme rate of change of any dynamcal varable s the sum of the Posson bracket wth the Hamltonan and the partal tme dervatve. If a dynamcal varable has no explct tme dependence, f 0, then the total tme dervatve s just the Posson bracket wth the Hamltonan. The coordnates provde another mportant specal case. Snce nether x nor p has any explct tme dependence, we have g ξ D dx dp H, x } H, p } 2 or smply ξ A H, ξ A}, and we can check ths drectly that ths reproduces Hamlton s equatons, dq H, x } j1 j1 H p x H x j x H p j p j x j δ j H p j 2

and dp H, p } j1 H p H p H q j p j p j q j Notce that snce q, p and are all ndependent, and do not depend explctly on tme, p. We also have the commutator of the Hamltonan wth the Hamltonan tself, p j p q j 0 dh H, H} + H H so f the Hamltonan s not explctly tme-dependent, then t s a constant of the moton. f More generally, a dynamcal varable wth no explct tme dependence, 0, s a constant of the moton f and only f t has vanshng Posson bracket wth the Hamltonan, H, f} 0. 2 Canoncal transformatons We now defne the fundamental Posson brackets. Suppose x and p j are a set of coordnates on phase space such that Hamlton s equatons hold. Snce they themselves are functons of x m, p n they are dynamcal varables and we may compute ther Posson brackets wth one another. Wth ξ A x m, p n we have for x wth x j, for x wth p j and fnally x, x j} AB x x j Ω ξ x x j x m x x j 0 m1 x, p j }ξ p j, x } AB x p j Ω ξ x p j x m x p j δ j m1 δmδ j m m1 p, p j } ξ Ω AB p p j p p j x m p p j 0 m1 3

for p wth p j. The subscrpt ξ on the bracket ndcates that the partal dervatves are taken wth respect to the coordnates ξ A x, p j. We summarze these relatons as ξ A, ξ B} ξ ΩAB However, snce Posson brackets are preserved by canoncal transformatons, ths wll hold n any canoncal coordnates, ξ A, ξ B} χ ΩAB. We summarze the results of ths subsecton wth a theorem: Let the coordnates ξ A be canoncal. Then a coordnate transformaton χ A ξ s canoncal f and only f t satsfes the fundamental bracket relaton χ A, χ B} ξ ΩAB For proof, note that the bracket on the left s defned by χ A, χ B} ξ χa χ B ΩCD ξ C ξ D so n order for χ A to satsfy the canoncal bracket relaton we must have CD χa χ B Ω ξ C ξ D ΩAB 3 whch s just the condton shown above for the coordnate transformaton χ A ξ to be canoncal. Conversely, suppose the transformaton χ A ξ s canoncal, so that eq.3 holds. Then, computng the Posson bracket χ A, χ B} ξ ΩCD χa ξ C χ B ξ D ΩAB so χ A satsfes the fundamental bracked relaton. In summary, each of the followng statements s equvalent: 1. χ A ξ s a canoncal transformaton. 2. χ A ξ s a coordnate transformaton of phase space that preserves Hamlton s equatons. 3. χ A ξ preserves the symplectc form, accordng to AB ξc ξ D Ω χ A χ B ΩCD 4. χ A ξ satsfes the fundamental bracket relatons χ A, χ B} ξ ΩAB These bracket relatons represent a set of ntegrablty condtons that must be satsfed by any new set of canoncal coordnates. When we formulate the problem of canoncal transformatons n these terms, t s not obvous what functons q x j, p j and π x j, p j wll be allowed. Fortunately there s a smple procedure for generatng canoncal transformatons, whch we develop n the next secton. We end ths secton wth three examples of canoncal transformatons. 4

2.1 Example 1: Coordnate transformatons Let x, p j be one set of canoncal varables. Suppose we defne new confguraton space varables, q, be an arbtrary nvertble functon of the spatal coordnates: q q x j We seek a set of momentum varables π j such that q, π j are canoncal. For ths they must satsfy the fundamental Posson bracket relatons: q, q j} x,p 0 q, π j } x,p δ j π, π j } x,p 0 Check each: q, q j} x,p 0 m1 q q j x m q q j snce qj p m 0. For the second bracket, δj q, π j }x,p q π j x m q π j m1 m1 x m π j p m Snce q s ndependent of p m, we can satsfy ths only f Integratng gves π j xm p m q j π j xn q j p n + c j x wth the c j an arbtrary functons of x. Choosng c j 0, we compute the fnal bracket: π, π j } x,p π π j x m π π j p m p m x m x n x s x m p n p m q j p s x n x s p m p n x m q j p s xm x n q j x m p n xm x n x m q j p n 2 x n q j p n 2 x n q j p n 0 Exercse: Show that the fnal bracket, π, π j } x,p stll vanshes provded c f for some functon f q. 5

Therefore, the transformatons q j q j x π j xn q j p n + f q j s a canoncal transformaton for any functons q x. Ths means that the symmetry group of Hamlton s equatons s at least as bg as the symmetry group of the Euler-Lagrange equatons. 2.2 Example 2: Interchange of x and p. The transformaton q p π x s canoncal. We easly check the fundamental brackets: q, q j} x,p p, p j } x,p 0 q, π j } x,p p, x j} x,p x j, p }x,p δ j π, π j } x,p x, x j} x,p 0 Interchange of x and p j, wth a sgn, s therefore canoncal. The use of generalzed coordnates n Lagrangan mechancs does not nclude such a possblty, so Hamltonan dynamcs has a larger symmetry group than Lagrangan dynamcs. For our next example, we frst show that the composton of two canoncal transformatons s also canoncal. Let ψ χ and χ ξ both be canoncal. Defnng the composton transformaton, ψ ξ ψ χ ξ, we compute CD ψa ψ B ψ A Ω ξ C ξ D χ E ψ B χ F ΩCD χ E ξ C χ F ξ D χ E χ F ψ A ψ B ξ C ξ D ΩCD χ E χ F so that ψ ξ s canoncal. Ω EF ψ A χ E Ω AB 2.3 Example 3: Momentum transformatons ψ B By the prevous results, the composton of an arbtratry coordnate change wth x, p nterchanges s canoncal. Consder the effect of composng a an nterchange, b a coordnate transformaton, and c an nterchange. For a, let q p π x χ F 6

Then for b we choose an arbtrary functon of q : Fnally, for c, another nterchange: Combnng all three, we have Q F q j P qn Q π n q P π Q q P qn Q π n pn π x n π Q F q j F p j so that π s replaced by an arbtrary functon of the orgnal momenta. Ths establshes that replacng the momenta by any ndependent functons of the momenta, preserves Hamlton s equatons as long as we choose the proper coordnates q. 3 Generatng functons There s a systematc approach to canoncal transformatons usng generatng functons. We wll gve a smple example of the technque. Gven a system descrbed by a Hamltonan Hx, p j, we seek another Hamltonan H q, π j such that the equatons of moton have the same form, namely n the orgnal system and dx dp dq dπ H p H x H π H n the transformed varables. The prncple of least acton must hold for each par: S S ˆ p dx H ˆ π dq H where S and S dffer by at most a constant. Correspondngly, the ntegrands may dffer by the addton of a total dfferental, df df, snce ths wll ntegrate to a surface term and therefore wll not contrbute to the varaton. In general we may therefore wrte p dx H π dq H + df 7

and solve for the dfferental df df p dx π dq + H H For the dfferental of f to take ths form, t must be a functon of x, q and t, f fx, q, t. Therefore, the dfferental of f s df f x dx + f dq + f Equatng the expressons for df we match up terms to requre The frst equaton p f x 4 π f 5 H H + f p fxj, q j, t x 7 gves q mplctly n terms of the orgnal varables, whle the second determnes π. Ths choce fxes the form of π by eq.5, whle eq.6 gves the new Hamltonan n terms of the old one. The functon f s the generatng functon of the transformaton. There are other types of generatng functons. By makng a Legendre transformaton, we can change the ndependent varables. For example, settng we have f p x + f 2 p, q, t p dx H π dq H + df π dq H + dp x + p dx + df 2 p, q, t H π dq H + dp x + df 2 p, q, t so that the ndependent varables are now p, q, satsfyng 6 We may also defne x f p π f H H + f f π q + f 3 x, π j, t f p x π q + f 4 p, π j, t so that the ndependent varables may be taken as ether of the new coordnates wth ether of the old coordnates. 8

3.1 Example 1 Let f 2 be a general quadratc, f 2 p, q j, t 1 aj t q q j + b j t p q j + c j t p p j 2 Then x 1 aj q q j + 2b p 2 jp q j + c j p p j b jq j + c j p j π 1 aj q q j + 2b 2 jp q j + c j p p j a j q j + b jp H H + 1 ȧ j t q q j + 2 ḃ j t p q j + ċ j t p p j 3.2 Example 2 Let f 2 p, q j, t g p, t + g p q + 1 2 f j p q q j + 1 3! f jk p q q j q k Then x g p, t g p q 12 p f j p q q j 13! f jk p q q j q k π g p f j p q j 1 2 f jk p q j q k H H + g p, t 9