Hach Method Total Organic Carbon in Finished Drinking Water by Catalyzed Ozone Hydroxyl Radical Oxidation Infrared Analysis

Similar documents
Hach Method Spectrophotometric Measurement of Free Chlorine (Cl 2 ) in Finished Drinking Water

Hach Company TNTplus 835/836 Nitrate Method Spectrophotometric Measurement of Nitrate in Water and Wastewater

Hach Company TNTplus TM Phosphorus Spectrophotometric Measurement of Phosphorus in Water and Wastewater

ALLOWAY METHOD OUTLINE

Standard Operating Procedure for the Analysis of Dissolved Inorganic Carbon CCAL 21A.1

Total Dissolved Residue (Total Dissolved Solids, TDS) in Aqueous Matrices

Revision: 11 (MBAS) ALLOWAY METHOD OUTLINE. Standard Laboratory Method:

LOW-RANGE TOTAL CHLORINE

Timberline Ammonia-001. Determination of Inorganic Ammonia by Continuous Flow Gas Diffusion and Conductivity Cell Analysis

Standard Operating Procedure VUSP M

Standard Operating Procedure for the Analysis of Chloride, Bromide and Sulfate in Fresh Waters by Ion Chromatography CCAL 50B.2

Standard Operating Procedure for the Analysis of Silica in Fresh Waters CCAL 32A.2

Alkalinity, USEPA by Flow Injection Analysis (FIA)

Z/zs. tnitiats: wu\ Z-z* I A. sop-c-102. Determination of Chemical Oxygen Demand. Revision 6. Approval: Effective date: 3. Renewat date: 7lt:,:

Standard Operating Procedure VUSP N

Cadmium Reduction Method Method to 0.50 mg/l NO 3 N (LR) Powder Pillows

Standard Operating Procedure for: Conductivity Using Cole-Parmer Traceable Portable Conductivity Meter. Missouri State University.

Chloride by Flow Injection Analysis (FIA)

Cadmium Reduction Method Method to 30.0 mg/l NO 3 N (HR) Powder Pillows or AccuVac Ampuls

QUALITY CONTROL CRITERIA FOR CHEMISTRY EXCEPT RADIOCHEMISTRY.

Colorimetric Method Method to 0.70 mg/l Ag Powder Pillows

Hexavalent Chromium by Flow Injection Analysis (FIA)

Standard Operating Procedure for the Analysis of Nitrate/Nitrite and Nitrite in Fresh Waters CCAL 31B.1

METHOD DETERMINATION OF SULFATE BY AUTOMATED COLORIMETRY. Edited by James W. O'Dell Inorganic Chemistry Branch Chemistry Research Division

Standard Operating Procedure for: ph using Oakton ph 5+ Handheld ph Meter. Missouri State University. and

METHOD 7B - DETERMINATION OF NITROGEN OXIDE EMISSIONS FROM STATIONARY SOURCES (ULTRAVIOLET SPECTROPHOTOMETRIC METHOD)

METHOD 9210 POTENTIOMETRIC DETERMINATION OF NITRATE IN AQUEOUS SAMPLES WITH ION-SELECTIVE ELECTRODE

METHOD 8030A ACROLEIN AND ACRYLONITRILE BY GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY

USGS District Laboratory, Troy, NY Dissolved Inorganic Carbon Analysis Standard Operating Procedure

Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen by Gas Diffusion and Flow Injection Analysis (FIA)

Cadmium Reduction Method Method to 10.0 mg/l NO 3 N (MR, spectrophotometers) 0.2 to 5.0 mg/l NO 3 N (MR, colorimeters)

Appendix A. Glossary of Definitions, Acronyms, Abbreviations and Symbols. March 1997

Cadmium Reduction Method Method 8171 MR (0.1 to 10.0 mg/l NO 3

Organic Carbon, Total (Low Level) (UV Promoted, Persulfate Oxidation) CAS # Total Organic Carbon TOC C

Nitrate plus Nitrite and Nitrite in Seawater by Segmented Flow Analysis (SFA)

Chlorine, Free and Total, High Range

Method April 1995

Perfluorinated Alkyl Acids (PFAA) in Water by LC/MS/MS - PBM

Method to 0.50 mg/l NH 3 N Powder Pillows

DETERMINATION OF NITRATE IN 2M KCl SOIL EXTRACTS BY FLOW INJECTION ANALYSIS NITRATE REDUCTASE

DR/4000 PROCEDURE NITRATE. 2. The display will show:

United States EPA Method 415.3

Method to 0.50 mg/l NH 3 N Powder Pillows

Oxygen Demand, Chemical

Ohio EPA Total (Extracellular and Intracellular) Microcystins - ADDA by ELISA Analytical Methodology Ohio EPA DES Version 2.

DETERMINATION OF NITRATE IN BRACKISH WATERS BY FLOW INJECTION ANALYSIS NITRATE REDUCTASE

Nitrogen, Total Inorganic

Results of the EPA Method 1631 Validation Study

Glossary of Common Laboratory Terms

Copyright ENCO Laboratories, Inc. II. Quality Control. A. Introduction

Chlorine, Total. USEPA DPD Method 1 Method to mg/l as Cl 2 Chemkey Reagents. Test preparation. Before starting.

METHOD DETERMINATION OF AMMONIA NITROGEN BY SEMI-AUTOMATED COLORIMETRY

METHOD 7060A ARSENIC (ATOMIC ABSORPTION, FURNACE TECHNIQUE)

Scope and application: For water, wastewater and seawater. Distillation is required for wastewater and seawater.

METHOD DETERMINATION OF PHOSPHORUS BY SEMI-AUTOMATED COLORIMETRY

Draft PS 18 APPENDIX A Dynamic Spiking Procedure ( ) 1.1 This appendix to Performance Specification 18

Responsibilities: Effective Date: November Revision Date: February 8, VP, Facilities and Construction Management. Issuing Authority:

Chromium, Total. Alkaline Hypobromite Oxidation Method 1 Method to 0.70 mg/l Cr (spectrophotometers) 0.01 to 0.60 mg/l Cr (colorimeters)

Laboratory ID. Laboratory Name. Analyst(s) Auditor. Date(s) of Audit. Type of Audit Initial Biennial Special ELCP TNI/NELAP.

SECTION D.2 AMMONIA NITROGEN

Tetraphenylborate Method Method to 7.0 mg/l K Powder Pillows

DR/4000 PROCEDURE NITRATE. Using Powder Pillows

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES SOP: 1828 PAGE: 1 of 14 REV: 0.0 DATE: 05/12/95 ANALYSIS OF METHYL PARATHION IN CARPET SAMPLES BY GC/MS

Chlorine, Free and Total, High Range

Bromide by Flow Injection Analysis (FIA)

Cyanide, Total or Weak Acid Dissociable, by Manual Distillation - PBM

Standard Operating Procedure for: Total Phosphorus (3010R02 Total P.doc) Missouri State University. and

METHOD DETERMINATION OF TOTAL CYANIDE BY SEMI-AUTOMATED COLORIMETRY

CHLORINE, TOTAL (0 to 4.00 mg/l)

Standard Operating Procedure for the Analysis of Fresh Water Samples for Orthophosphorus CCAL 34B.2

Oxygen Demand, Chemical

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES SOP: 1826 PAGE: 1 of 18 REV: 0.0 DATE: 03/30/95 ANALYSIS OF METHYL PARATHION IN WIPE SAMPLES BY GC/MS

Is the laboratory s pledge or declaration of the quality of the results produced. to produce data compliant with the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA)

METHOD 8033 ACETONITRILE BY GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY WITH NITROGEN-PHOSPHORUS DETECTION

Phosphorus, Total. USEPA 1 PhosVer 3 with Acid Persulfate Digestion Method Method to 3.50 mg/l PO. Test preparation

Total Phosphorus, USEPA by Flow Injection Analysis (FIA)

METHOD 7471B MERCURY IN SOLID OR SEMISOLID WASTE (MANUAL COLD-VAPOR TECHNIQUE)

Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (TKN), USEPA by Flow Injection Analysis (FIA)

Chromotropic Acid Method Method to 30.0 mg/l NO 3 N (HR) Test N Tube Vials

Chlorine, Free and Total, Low Range

DR/4000 PROCEDURE. IRON, Total

Mercuric Thiocyanate Method Method to 25.0 mg/l Cl Reagent Solution

METHOD 9040B. ph ELECTROMETRIC MEASUREMENT

Percent Solids Determination

ALLOWAY STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES FOR METHOD 504.1/8011

PAR Method Method to 2.0 mg/l Pb TNTplus 850

ASTM Designation: D Standard Test Method for Determination of Iodine Number of Activated Carbon

Cadmium Reduction Method (Using Powder Pillows or AccuVac Ampuls)

METHOD 9252A CHLORIDE (TITRIMETRIC, MERCURIC NITRATE)

Instrument Sample cell orientation Sample cell DR 6000 DR 3800 DR 2800 DR 2700 DR 5000 DR The fill line is to the right.

Carbon (Organic, and Inorganic)

Persulfate Digestion Method Method to 40 mg/l N (HR) TNTplus 827

Method Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen in Water and Biosolids by Automated Colorimetry with Preliminary Semi-automatic Digestion. DRAFT January 2001

University of Tennessee Safety Procedure

Seawater Extraction Procedure for Trace Metals

ALLOWAY. Method Outline. Standard Laboratory Method: Total Fluoride via Distillation. Distillation then Specific Ion. Date Issued: 01/04/82

Method for Nitrite determination on Low-Range Samples

Approximate Volatile Acids by Titration

HAZARD COMMUNICATION SAFETY PROGRAM

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE No. 52 STATIC ACID GENERATION (NAG) TEST

Transcription:

Hach Method 1061 Total Organic Carbon in Finished Drinking Water by Catalyzed Ozone Hydroxyl Radical Oxidation Infrared Analysis

Hach Company Method 1061 Revision 1. December 015 Organic Carbon in Finished Drinking Water by Hydroxyl Radical Oxidation Infrared Analysis 1.0 Scope and Application 1.1 This method is for the determination of total organic carbon (TOC) in finished drinking water. 1. The method is applicable in the range from 1.0 to 300 mg/l TOC. High TOC values can be determined by sample dilution. 1.3 This method is equally effective in performance and use to SM 5310-C and EPA 415.3 for the purposes of regulatory compliance reporting of TOC..0 Summary of Method.1 The on-line or laboratory organic carbon analyzer is used to monitor total organic carbon from a grab sample or continuous stream. The instrument has an on-board manufacturer s calibration that may be verified and adjusted using independent aqueous calibration solutions.. Ozone and base is added to a stream of water where hydroxyl radicals are formed. The hydroxyl radicals oxidize organic carbon to carbon dioxide (CO) and sodium oxalate. Sodium oxalate is further oxidized to CO through acidification and a manganese catalyst..3 The CO produced from oxidation is detected and quantified using non-dispersive infrared spectroscopy (NDIR). 3.0 Interferences 3.1 The method is subject to chloride interferences at concentration greater than 30% saline, and inorganic carbon at a concentration greater than 1000 mg/l. 3. Particulate matter greater than mm (cross sectional diameter) may restrict sample flow to the oxidation cell. 4.0 Safety 4.1 The toxicity or carcinogenicity of each reagent used in this method has not been precisely determined; however, each chemical should be treated as a potential health hazard. Exposure to these chemicals should be reduced to the lowest possible level. It is suggested that the laboratory perform personal hygiene monitoring of each analyst using this method and that the results of this monitoring be made available to the analyst. 4. Unknown samples may contain high concentrations of volatile toxic compounds. Sample containers should be opened in a hood and handled with gloves to prevent exposure. 1

4.3 This method does not address all safety issues associated with its use. The laboratory is responsible for maintaining a safe work environment and a current awareness file of OSHA regulations regarding the safe handling of any chemicals specified in this method. A reference file of material safety data sheets (MSDSs) should be available to all personnel involved in these analyses. Additional information on laboratory safety can be found in Sections 16.3 and 16.4. 5.0 Equipment Note: Brand names, suppliers, and part numbers are for illustrative purposes only. No endorsement is implied. Equivalent performance may be achieved using apparatus and materials other than those specified here, but demonstration of equivalent performance that meets the requirements of this method is the responsibility of the laboratory. 5.1 Sampling equipment 5.1.1 Sample collection bottles Collect samples in pre-cleaned glass bottles. Pre-cleaned bottles have been acid rinsed, sealed with foil, and baked at 400 C for at least 1 hour. 6.0 Equipment for sample analysis 6.1 On-line organic carbon analyzer 6.1.1 Hach Company BioTector TOC Analyzer, or equivalent 6. Equipment for standard preparation 6..1 Volumetric flask Glass, 500-mL and 00-mL. 6.. Volumetric pipette Glass, assorted sizes. 7.0 Reagents and Standards 7.1 Organic-free water Water in which TOC is below the detection limit of this method. Water prepared by passage of tap water through ion exchange and UV oxidation has been shown to be an acceptable source of reagent water. 7. Refer to the on-line organic carbon analyzer operating manual for a list of reagents specific to the instrument. Reagent grade chemicals or better should be used. 7.3 Hach Company TOC Standard Solutions: 1000 mg/l as TOC (Cat. No. 791505) or equivalent 7.4 Method detection limit (MDL) solution 7.4.1 If an MDL is required, prepare 7 or more replicate MDL solutions by diluting 1.0 ml of the 1000 mg/l stock standard spiking solution (Section 7.3) to 1000 ml. Final concentration = 1.0 mg/l TOC.

7.5 Initial precision and recovery (IPR) solution 7.5.1 Prepare 4 or more replicate IPR solutions by diluting 7.5 ml of the 1000 mg/l stock standard spiking solution (Section 7.3) to 500 ml. Final concentration = 15 mg/l TOC. 8.0 Sample Collection, Preservation and Storage 8.1 Samples should be collected in pre-cleaned glass bottles. Pre-cleaned bottles have been acid rinsed, sealed with foil, and baked at 400 C for at least 1 hour. Protect samples from sunlight. 8.1.1 Rinse the sample bottle several times with sample. Fill the bottle completely full. 8. Analyze samples as soon as possible. If immediate analysis is not possible, preserve samples by cooling to <6 o C, and adjust the ph to < with HCl, HSO4, or H3PO4. Analyze the preserved within 8 days of preservation. 9.0 Quality Control 9.1 Each laboratory that uses this method is expected to operate a formal quality assurance program (16.1). The minimum requirements of this program consist of an initial demonstration of laboratory capability and ongoing analyses of laboratory prepared reagent blank water and standards as a test of continued performance to assess accuracy and precision. Laboratory performance is compared to established performance criteria to determine if the results of analyses meet the performance characteristics of the method. 9.1.1 The analyst shall make an initial demonstration of the ability to generate acceptable accuracy and precision with this method. This ability is established as described in Sections 9. and 9.3. The laboratory shall, on an ongoing basis, demonstrate through analysis of the ongoing precision and recovery sample that the analysis system is in control. 9.1. Accompanying QC for the determination of TOC is required per analytical batch. An analytical batch is a set of samples processed during a contiguous 8-hour period. Each analytical batch must be accompanied by an ongoing precision and recovery sample (OPR), matrix spike sample (MS), and matrix spike duplicate sample (MSD) resulting in a minimum of four analyses (1 OPR, 1 sample, MS, and MSD). 9. Initial demonstration of laboratory capability. 9..1 To establish the ability to detect TOC the analyst shall determine the MDL using the apparatus, reagents, and standards that will be used in the practice of this method. An achieved MDL less than or equal to the MDL in Section 13.0 is recommended prior to the practice of this method. 9.. Prepare and measure seven replicates of the MDL standard (Sect. 7.4) according to the procedure in Section 11. 9..3 Using the results of the set of seven analyses, compute the MDL using the following equation: 3

where: MMMMMM = ( x) x n n 1 3.14 n = Number of samples (7) x = measured concentration of each sample 9.3 Initial precision and recovery (IPR) - To establish the ability to generate acceptable precision and accuracy, the analyst shall perform the following operations: 9.3.1 Prepare and analyze a reagent water blank. Compare the reagent water blank concentration to the corresponding limit in Table 1 (Section 17). If the result meets the acceptance criterion, blank performance is acceptable. If the result is unacceptable, identify and correct the issue and repeat the test. 9.3. Prepare and measure four samples of the IPR standard (Sect. 7.5) according to the procedure in Section 11. 9.3.3 Using the results of the set of four analyses, compute the average percent recovery (x) and the standard deviation of the percent recovery (s) for TOC. Use the following equation for calculation of the standard deviation of the percent recovery: s = ( x) x n n 1 where: n = Number of samples (4) x = % recovery in each sample 9.3.3.1 Compare s and x with the corresponding limits for initial precision and recovery in Table 1 (Sect. 17). If s and x meet the acceptance criteria, system performance is acceptable and analysis of samples may begin. If, however, s exceeds the precision limit or x falls outside the range for recovery, system performance is unacceptable. In this event, correct the problem, and repeat the test. 9.4 Ongoing precision and recovery (OPR) - To demonstrate that the analysis system is in control, and acceptable precision and accuracy is being maintained with each analytical batch, the analyst shall perform the following operations: 4

9.4.1 Prepare a 15 mg/l recovery standard with each analytical batch as described in Sect. 7.5.1 and measure according to the procedure in Section 11. Calculate the percent recovery and compare this value with the limits for ongoing recovery in Table (Sect. 17). If the percent recovery meets the acceptance criteria, system performance is acceptable. If the percent recovery falls outside the acceptance criteria, system performance is unacceptable. In this event, correct the problem, and repeat the test. 9.4.1.1 Measure a field sample. After measuring the background concentration, spike the sample with a known concentration of TOC. The spike concentration should be 1-5 times the background concentration, but still within the reporting range of the method. Prepare a duplicate of this spiked sample. 9.4.1. Measure the spike duplicates and calculate the spike recovery for each sample and the relative percent difference (RPD) between the two results. Use the following equation to calculate the spike recovery: [CCCCCCCC] [BBBBBBBB] SSSSSSSSSS RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR = 100 [SSSS] where: [Conc] = the measured concentration of the spiked sample [Bkgd] = the measured concentration of the un-spiked sample [Sp] = the concentration of the spike where: RRRRRR = CCCCCCCC 1 CCCCCCCC CCCCCCCC 100 1 + CCCCCCCC Conc1 = the concentration of the first spiked sample Conc = the concentration of the second spiked sample 9.4.1.3 Compare the spike recoveries and RPD with the corresponding limits in Table (Sect. 17). If recoveries and RPD meet the acceptance criteria, system performance is acceptable and analysis of samples may begin. If recoveries or RPD fall outside the limits, system performance is unacceptable. In this event, correct the problem, and repeat the test. 9.4.1.4 The laboratory should add results that pass to IPR and previous OPR data and update QC charts to form a graphic representation of continued laboratory performance. The laboratory should also develop a statement of laboratory data quality for each analyte by calculating the average percent recovery (R) and the standard deviation of the percent recovery (sr). Express the accuracy as a recovery interval from R - sr to R + sr. For example, if R = 95% and sr = 5%, the accuracy is 85% to 105%. Control charts are acceptable for evaluating process control, but under no circumstances can the control limits be widened beyond those established in the acceptance criteria defined in Section 13. 5

10.0 Calibration and Standardization 10.1 The Hach BioTector TOC Analyzer has a built-in calibration. No further initial calibration is required. However, the instruments have the capability of developing a user-calibration. See manufacturer s manual for instructions. 10. Calibration Verification 10..1 To verify that the instrument is measuring TOC properly, analyze a 1.0 mg/l (Sect. 7.4) and 15.0 mg/l (Sect. 7.5) TOC standard. Results should be within 15 percent of the actual value. Perform this calibration verification daily while instrument is in use. If the calibration verification standard result is outside the limit, it is unacceptable. In this event, correct the problem, and repeat the test. 11.0 Procedure 11.1 Instrument Setup follow the instrument manufacturer s instructions for instrument setup. 11. Follow the manufacturer s instructions for sample analysis. 1.0 Data Analysis and Calculations 1.1 TOC concentration is calculated automatically against internal instrument calibration. 13.0 Method Performance Performance of the method was demonstrated in multi-lab studies comparing the method against EPA Reference Method SM 5310-C. The method was evaluated in low ionic strength reference matrix as well as multiple geographically diverse finished drinking water samples obtained from both surface water and ground water sources. Validation Results Section Limit Method Detection Limit 9. 0.0 mg/l Initial Recovery 9.3 100% Initial Recovery Range 9.3 99.3% - 101% Initial Precision 95% 9.3 0.01 Matrix Spike Recovery 9.4.1 10% Matrix Recovery Range 9.4.1 96.5% - 107% Matrix Recovery Precision 95% 9.4.1 0.0 14.0 Pollution Prevention 14.1 Follow guidelines in Section 15. 15.0 Waste Management 15.1 It is the laboratory s responsibility to comply with all federal, state, and local regulations governing waste management, particularly the hazardous waste identification rules and land disposal restrictions, and to protect air, water, and land by minimizing and control 6

all releases from fume hoods and bench operations. Compliance with all sewage discharge permits and regulations is also required. 15. For further information on waste management, consult The Waste Management manual for Laboratory Personnel, and Less is Better: Laboratory Chemical Management for Waste Reduction, both available from the American Society s Department of Government Relations and Science Policy, 1155 16 th Street N.W., Washington, D.C. 0036. 16.0 References 16.1 Protocol for the Evaluation of Alternate Test Procedures for Organic and Inorganic Analytes in Drinking Water, USEPA, EPA-815-R-15-007, February 015. 16. 40 CFR 136, Appendix B. 16.3 OSHA Safety and Health Standards, General Industry, (9 CFR 1910), Occupational Safety and Health Administration, OSHA 06 (Revised, January 1976) 16.4 Safety in Academic Chemistry Laboratories, American Chemical Society, Committee on Chemical Safety, 3 rd Edition, 1979. 16.5 Water Analysis Handbook, Hach Company, 8 th Edition, 013. 17.0 Tables 17.1 Acceptance Criteria for Performance tests The QC performance criteria for this method were performed with a Hach Company BioTector TOC Analyzer. Table 1. Initial Precision and Recovery Acceptance Criteria Parameter Acceptance Criteria Reagent Blank 0.5 mg/l C Percent Recovery 90% - 110% Relative Standard Deviation 10% Table. Ongoing Precision and Recovery Acceptance Criteria Parameter Acceptance Criteria Reagent Blank 0.5 mg/l C Lab Fortified Blank Recovery 90-110% Sample Matrix Spike Recovery 70-130% Sample Matrix Spike Recovery RPD 10% 7

18.0 Glossary of Definitions and Purposes The definitions and purposes are specified to this method but have been conformed to common usage as much as possible. 18.1 Units of weight and measure and their abbreviations 18.1.1 Symbols o C: degrees Celsius 18.1. Alphabetical characters mg/l: milligram per liter 18. Definitions, acronyms, and abbreviations 18..1 MDL: Method detection limit 18.. IPR: Initial precision and recovery 18..3 OPR: On-going precision and recovery 18..4 MS: Matrix spike 18..5 MSD: Matrix spike duplicate 18..6 LIS: Low ionic strength, deionized water 18..7 HIS: High ionic strength, 50 mg/l CO3, 50 mg/l CaCO3